The Trojans and Their Neighbours

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Trojans and Their Neighbours 1111 2 3 7 4 5111 THE NEW CITY 6 7 (LEVELS VIII TO IX) 8 9 10111 11 2 3111 A FRESH LEASE OF LIFE 4 Aeolian Greeks had become the proud possessors of the all but 5 derelict site where they believed great heroes had once dwelt, where 6 once King Priam had ruled. Before its walls mighty warriors had 7 fought, slaughtered and died, their exploits celebrated in a succes- 8 sion of bardic songs spanning many centuries and culminating 9 finally in the tale told by Homer, the greatest bard of them all. His 20111 was the creative genius that would ensure immortality for this 1 setting and the story that allegedly took place within it. 2 But the great days of the city were now long past. There would 3 be no glorious new era for Troy, now called Ilion. The new age 4 Trojans went about their daily activities in relatively comfortable 5 obscurity. In practical terms the city had lost its essential raison 6 d’être. Whether or not it had served as the gateway to regular trading 7 contacts with the Black Sea and regions beyond in the Bronze Age, 8 its close sea access had undoubtedly been a key to its prosperity and 9 to the attractions it offered to those with whom it came into contact, 30111 whether in peace or in war. Its location on the north-western flank 1 of the Hittite empire had made it a strategically valuable asset to 2 the empire in a region that was prone to insurrectionist activity and 3 unwelcome intervention from across the Aegean. But changes in the 4 topography of Troy’s coastal areas, which were imposing increasing 5 limitations on its sea access, removed any major practical incentive 6 for its redevelopment on a large commercial scale. Further, the polit- 7 ical reshaping of the western Anatolian region deprived it of the 8 strategic importance it had enjoyed in the days of the Great 9111 Kingdom of Hatti. folio 151 THE NEW CITY (LEVELS VIII TO IX) 1111 CASPIAN BLACK 2 SEA 3 Troy Gordion 4 LYDIA PHRYGIA 5111 Sardis Halys R. SEA 6 L. Van L. Urmia 7 Tigris R. 8 ASSYRIA O r o 9 n t e Euphrates R. Nineveh s R 10111 . 11 MEDITERRANEAN PERSIA 2 SEA SYRIAN DESERT 3111 BA Babylon B Susa YL DEAD O 4 NI SEA A 5 Memphis 6 7 EGYPT 8 Nile R. 9 RED 0 400 km 20111 SEA 1 2 Map 7.1 Homelands of the Near Eastern kingdoms, first half of first 3 millennium BC. 4 5 6 7 Ilion was left largely undisturbed by the dramatic changes that 8 were taking place in the Near Eastern world during the first half 9 of the first millennium. Five great empires rose and four of them 30111 fell in this period. The first of these was the so-called Neo-Assyrian 1 empire. From his northern Mesopotamian homeland, the Assyrian 2 king Adad-nirari II (c.911–891) embarked upon a programme of 3 aggressive territorial expansion that reached its peak in the reign 4 of Sargon (c.721–705), around the time Aeolian settlers were occupy- 5 ing the site of Troy. A century later, the Assyrian kingdom fell to 6 a coalition formed between the Chaldean rulers of Babylonia and 7 the newly emerging kingdom of the Medes east of the Tigris. The 8 Chaldeans now became the new overlords of Mesopotamia. But the 911 empire that they built was one of the briefest in the history of folio 152 THE NEW CITY (LEVELS VIII TO IX) 1111 the Near East. After peaking in the reign of the biblically infamous 2 Nebuchadnezzar (c.605–562), it was destroyed in 539 by the newly 3 emerging Persian empire founded by Cyrus the Great. Already Cyrus 4 had conquered the Lydian empire of western Anatolia, which had 5111 arisen after the collapse of the kingdom of Phrygia; the latter, whose 6 royal seat lay at Gordion in central Anatolia, had been founded in 7 the eighth century by King Mita (Greek Midas). Cyrus comprehen- 8 sively defeated the Lydian king Croesus in a battle outside the Lydian 9 capital Sardis in 546, and thereupon incorporated his kingdom into 10111 the Persian empire, which now extended to the Ionian cities along 11 the Aegean coast, formerly subjects of the Lydian king. 2 This constant reconfiguring of the map of the Near East appears 3111 to have had minimal effect on the backwater settlement in the 4 Troad. The present little township on the site, which lacked even 5 the status of a polis, was but a pale shadow of the royal capital that 6 had once been there. But Ilion was not destined to sink into oblivion. 7 On the contrary, current developments in the Greek world ensured 8 that its name would become ever more widely known. The great 9 Greek diaspora (c.800–500 BC) commonly called the colonization 20111 movement did much to facilitate the spread of Homer’s tales to 1 many parts of the expanding Greek world. And in sixth-century 2 Athens, during the regime of the tyrant Pisistratus, performances of 3 the Homeric epics were incorporated into the newly reorganized 4 Panathenaic festival. Perhaps now for the first time they gained 5 permanent form in writing.1 6 Athens’ official adoption of the epics could hardly have been 7 prompted by the role that Homer assigned its warriors in the 8 Achaean Confederacy. The part the Athenian contingent played in 9 the conflict was a minor one and produced no Athenian heroes 30111 worthy of note. Rather, under Pisistratus’ leadership Athens was 1 inspired by a panhellenic vision in which it saw itself as the cultural 2 as well as the commercial centre of the Greek world. The ambitious 3 new building programmes, the city’s vigorous commercial develop- 4 ment and the revamping of its religious festivals were all explicit 5 statements of its self-assumed role as the leading state in Greece. By 6 embedding the Homeric poems within their city’s most important 7 religious and cultural festival, the Athenians were in effect closely 8 identifying the city with the greatest and most widely known 9111 literary masterpieces of the Greek world. Henceforth Athens would folio 153 THE NEW CITY (LEVELS VIII TO IX) 1111 become the cultural and spiritual home of these masterpieces. Their 2 adoption was an explicit statement of the city’s role as the focus of 3 panhellenic culture. 4 It was also the expression of an outlook that drew no distinction 5111 between those who fought on the Greek side and those who fought 6 on the Trojan. Though both sides slaughtered each other mercilessly 7 on the plains of Troy, Homeric tradition united them in a common 8 culture, with shared beliefs and customs, and adherence to a common 9 set of ideals and values. So too, Pisistratid Athens embraced all its 10111 Homeric heroes without distinction. And the incorporation of the 11 epics in Athens’ most important festival no doubt spawned genera- 2 tions of little Hectors and Priams and Andromaches alongside many 3111 an infant Achilles, Agamemnon and Helen. 4 But any affinity or empathy the Classical Greeks may have felt 5 with the legendary inhabitants of Troy was soon to give way to 6 feelings of a quite different kind – in the context of the rise of Persia 7 and its relentless advance westwards. 8 9 THE PERSIAN FACTOR 20111 1 After the fall of the Lydian empire, the Greek states along Anatolia’s 2 Aegean coast were also forced to acknowledge the conqueror Cyrus 3 as their sovereign. For most practical purposes, they were merely 4 exchanging one overlord for another. But they fiercely resented their 5 subjection to the Persian despot. For almost fifty years the resent- 6 ment simmered. Finally, in the reign of the emperor Darius, the 7 Greek states joined forces in an heroic and ultimately futile rebellion 8 against Persian rule (499). Athens responded to an appeal for assis- 9 tance by dispatching to their Ionian kinsfolk a small fleet of twenty 30111 ships. But defeat was inevitable. Darius ruthlessly crushed the rebel- 1 lion and then turned his attention to the Greek mainland. He was 2 furious at Athens for its support of the rebels. This, allegedly, was 3 one of the reasons for his abortive invasion of mainland Greece in 490 4 – which was followed by a much more ambitious and determined 5 invasion by his son and successor Xerxes ten years later. 6 Troy once more comes to our attention in the course of Xerxes’ 7 preparations for leading his vast army from Asia into Europe. On 8 reaching the Scamander River and before crossing the Hellespont, 911 Xerxes ascended the citadel of Troy, where he was told the whole folio 154 THE NEW CITY (LEVELS VIII TO IX) 1111 story of the place. Thereupon, he sacrificed 1,000 oxen to the goddess 2 Athena of Ilion and ordered his priests to offer libations to the 3 heroes of the Trojan War.2 4 According to Herodotus, the Persians dated their hostility to 5111 Greece right back to the time of Troy’s fall. And it is possible that 6 Xerxes sought to represent himself as the avenger of Troy’s defeat 7 – the avenger arising from the bones of King Priam. His arrival at 8 Troy was a critical point in his campaign against Greece.
Recommended publications
  • The Orontids of Armenia by Cyril Toumanoff
    The Orontids of Armenia by Cyril Toumanoff This study appears as part III of Toumanoff's Studies in Christian Caucasian History (Georgetown, 1963), pp. 277-354. An earlier version appeared in the journal Le Muséon 72(1959), pp. 1-36 and 73(1960), pp. 73-106. The Orontids of Armenia Bibliography, pp. 501-523 Maps appear as an attachment to the present document. This material is presented solely for non-commercial educational/research purposes. I 1. The genesis of the Armenian nation has been examined in an earlier Study.1 Its nucleus, succeeding to the role of the Yannic nucleus ot Urartu, was the 'proto-Armenian,T Hayasa-Phrygian, people-state,2 which at first oc- cupied only a small section of the former Urartian, or subsequent Armenian, territory. And it was, precisely, of the expansion of this people-state over that territory, and of its blending with the remaining Urartians and other proto- Caucasians that the Armenian nation was born. That expansion proceeded from the earliest proto-Armenian settlement in the basin of the Arsanias (East- ern Euphrates) up the Euphrates, to the valley of the upper Tigris, and espe- cially to that of the Araxes, which is the central Armenian plain.3 This expand- ing proto-Armenian nucleus formed a separate satrapy in the Iranian empire, while the rest of the inhabitants of the Armenian Plateau, both the remaining Urartians and other proto-Caucasians, were included in several other satrapies.* Between Herodotus's day and the year 401, when the Ten Thousand passed through it, the land of the proto-Armenians had become so enlarged as to form, in addition to the Satrapy of Armenia, also the trans-Euphratensian vice-Sa- trapy of West Armenia.5 This division subsisted in the Hellenistic phase, as that between Greater Armenia and Lesser Armenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Rules, Aug
    SUCCESSORS—Living Rules, Aug. 2019 1 The Battles for Alexander’s Empire by Mark Simonitch, Richard Berg, and John B. Firer RULES OF PLAY Living Rules, August 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ......................................................... 2 14. Special Combat Units ......................................... 12 2. Game Components .............................................. 2 15. Sieges and Subjugations ..................................... 12 3. Sequence of Play ................................................. 3 16. Independent Armies ............................................ 13 4. How to Win ......................................................... 4 17. Legitimacy & Prestige ........................................ 14 5. Label the Usurper Phase ..................................... 4 18. Royal Family Members ...................................... 15 6. The Reinforcement Phase ................................... 4 19. The Isolation Phase ............................................. 15 7. The Tyche Cards ................................................. 5 20. How to Win ......................................................... 16 8. Generals & Armies ............................................. 6 21. The Turn Record Track ....................................... 16 9. Movement ........................................................... 7 22. Prepare for Play .................................................. 16 10. Interception ......................................................... 8 23. Optional Rules ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Successors: Alexander's Legacy
    The Successors: Alexander’s Legacy November 20-22, 2015 Committee Background Guide The Successors: Alexander’s Legacy 1 Table of Contents Committee Director Welcome Letter ...........................................................................................2 Summons to the Babylon Council ................................................................................................3 The History of Macedon and Alexander ......................................................................................4 The Rise of Macedon and the Reign of Philip II ..........................................................................4 The Persian Empire ......................................................................................................................5 The Wars of Alexander ................................................................................................................5 Alexander’s Plans and Death .......................................................................................................7 Key Topics ......................................................................................................................................8 Succession of the Throne .............................................................................................................8 Partition of the Satrapies ............................................................................................................10 Continuity and Governance ........................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • The Anabasis of Alexander; Or, the History of the Wars and Conquests Of
    CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND GIVEN IN 1891 BY HENRY WILLIAMS SAGE Cornell University Library PA 3935.E5A3 1884 Anabasis of Alexander: or. The history o 3 1924 026 460 752 The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924026460752 THE ANABASIS OF ALEXANDER. THE ANABASIS OF ALEXANDER; OR, i^e Pislorg of tl^e ffiars anir Cottqnjcsts of '^hxmhtx tl^t (irtat. LITERALLY TRANSLATED, WITH A COMMENTARY, FROM THE GREEK OF ARRIAN THE NICOMEDIAN, BY E. J. CHINNOCK, M.A., LL.B., L0ND9N, Rector of Dumfries Academy. HODDER AND STOUGHTON, 27, PATERNOSTER ROW. MDCCCLXXXIV. "g 5~ /\ . 5"b r. f ^5- A3 Butler & Tanner. The Selwood Fiintiug Works, Frome, and London. PREFACE. When I began this Translation^ more than two years ago, I had no intention of publishing it; but as the work progressed, it occurred to me that Arrian is an Author deserving of more attention from the English- speaking races than he has yet received. No edition of his works has, so far as I am aware, ever appeared in England, though on the Continent many have been pub- lished. In the following Translation I have tried to give as literal a rendering of the Greek text as I could with- out transgressing the idioms of our own language. My theory of the duty of a Translator is, to give the ipsissima verba of his Author as nearly as possible, and not put into his mouth words which he never used, under the mistaken notion of improving his diction or his way of stating his case.
    [Show full text]
  • Eumenes, Neoptolemus and "PSI" XII 1284 Bosworth, a B Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Jan 1, 1978; 19, 3; Periodicals Archive Online Pg
    Eumenes, Neoptolemus and "PSI" XII 1284 Bosworth, A B Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Jan 1, 1978; 19, 3; Periodicals Archive Online pg. 227 Eumenes, Neoptolemus and PSI XII 1284 A. B. Bosworth N 1932 E. Breccia discovered a small scrap of papyrus at Kom Ali I el Gamman near Oxyrhynchus. Once discovered it waited nearly twenty years for publication. The editio princeps of 1951 was the work of Vittorio Bartoletti, aided by suggestions from Maas and Jacoby.1 The papyrus itself consists of three columns, numbered consecutively 81-83, of which the central column is preserved almost complete. Those to right and left are defective except for a few letters at the extremities which defy reconstruction.2 The script belongs to the late second century. I shall first give the text with rudimentary critical apparatus and then a translation of the consecutive narrative. ]!,TE"e [we cp]9flfPwTarrjV 7ToL[~e]ff!' r9~e i7T7T[E"v]eLv [T]~V 0tPW €7TEXcfJpoVV [€]v TagE [£] oi S€ KaT67TLv av.rwv, oeo£ imrije, fJ T [V]XOL ~g!}'59!,TL~OV wc lmO rfj gVVEXE{~ [T]WV fl~~cP!, cWa~:rEAoVvTE[C] ~v EP./-'O/\!}!,, a \, TWVA" L7T7TEWV. E"VP.EV1JC OE,"" wc( 'T7}VI TE SV'}'K/\T/CLVI:. I \ TOV- svvac-I:. 5 7TLCp.oV 7C!W Ma'5~S6vwV7TVK~V KaTELSEV Kat aVTOVC T~j~ yvcfJp.a[LC] EC, TO"'".... E7TL 7Tav KLVOVVEVELV~ " EPPWP.EVOVC,, 7TEP.7TELI av1"'0 LC .!:t,EVVLav~ I avopaJI ~ p.aKE"Sovt~ov7a rfj <p [W ]vfl, <ppacaL KEAEvcac WC KaTU c76p.a P.€V ou p.aXEL7aL aUToLc 7Tapa'5[oAov]~wv S~ T[fi] TE i7T7TC[) Kat TaLC TWV tPLAwv 7agECLV E"t[p]gOL aUTovc TWV E7TL7[rySEl]wv' oi S€, El Kat [EL] 10 7Tapv IXp.axol TLVEC ccptc [L]!, St;JKOVCLV aM' OtJT' [«Xv] Tep ')IE ALP.ep EVt V9~[V] avTLT[ 1 vO/Ll'O]r'TEC Latte: perhaps E1TtVOOV]r'TEC (cf Arrian 1.23.5 [see below]).
    [Show full text]
  • Troy Myth and Reality
    Part 1 Large print exhibition text Troy myth and reality Please do not remove from the exhibition This two-part guide provides all the exhibition text in large print. There are further resources available for blind and partially sighted people: Audio described tours for blind and partially sighted visitors, led by the exhibition curator and a trained audio describer will explore highlight objects from the exhibition. Tours are accompanied by a handling session. Booking is essential (£7.50 members and access companions go free) please contact: Email: [email protected] Telephone: 020 7323 8971 Thursday 12 December 2019 14.00–17.00 and Saturday 11 January 2020 14.00–17.00 1 There is also an object handling desk at the exhibition entrance that is open daily from 11.00 to 16.00. For any queries about access at the British Museum please email [email protected] 2 Sponsor’sThe Trojan statement War For more than a century BP has been providing energy to advance human progress. Today we are delighted to help you learn more about the city of Troy through extraordinary artefacts and works of art, inspired by the stories of the Trojan War. Explore the myth, archaeology and legacy of this legendary city. BP believes that access to arts and culture helps to build a more inspired and creative society. That’s why, through 23 years of partnership with the British Museum, we’ve helped nearly five million people gain a deeper understanding of world cultures with BP exhibitions, displays and performances. Our support for the arts forms part of our wider contribution to UK society and we hope you enjoy this exhibition.
    [Show full text]
  • Sean Manning, a Prosopography of the Followers of Cyrus the Younger
    The Ancient History Bulletin VOLUME THIRTY-TWO: 2018 NUMBERS 1-2 Edited by: Edward Anson ò Michael Fronda òDavid Hollander Timothy Howe òJoseph Roisman ò John Vanderspoel Pat Wheatley ò Sabine Müller òAlex McAuley Catalina Balmacedaò Charlotte Dunn ISSN 0835-3638 ANCIENT HISTORY BULLETIN Volume 32 (2018) Numbers 1-2 Edited by: Edward Anson, Catalina Balmaceda, Michael Fronda, David Hollander, Alex McAuley, Sabine Müller, Joseph Roisman, John Vanderspoel, Pat Wheatley Senior Editor: Timothy Howe Assistant Editor: Charlotte Dunn Editorial correspondents Elizabeth Baynham, Hugh Bowden, Franca Landucci Gattinoni, Alexander Meeus, Kurt Raaflaub, P.J. Rhodes, Robert Rollinger, Victor Alonso Troncoso Contents of volume thirty-two Numbers 1-2 1 Sean Manning, A Prosopography of the Followers of Cyrus the Younger 25 Eyal Meyer, Cimon’s Eurymedon Campaign Reconsidered? 44 Joshua P. Nudell, Alexander the Great and Didyma: A Reconsideration 61 Jens Jakobssen and Simon Glenn, New research on the Bactrian Tax-Receipt NOTES TO CONTRIBUTORS AND SUBSCRIBERS The Ancient History Bulletin was founded in 1987 by Waldemar Heckel, Brian Lavelle, and John Vanderspoel. The board of editorial correspondents consists of Elizabeth Baynham (University of Newcastle), Hugh Bowden (Kings College, London), Franca Landucci Gattinoni (Università Cattolica, Milan), Alexander Meeus (University of Leuven), Kurt Raaflaub (Brown University), P.J. Rhodes (Durham University), Robert Rollinger (Universität Innsbruck), Victor Alonso Troncoso (Universidade da Coruña) AHB is currently edited by: Timothy Howe (Senior Editor: [email protected]), Edward Anson, Catalina Balmaceda, Michael Fronda, David Hollander, Alex McAuley, Sabine Müller, Joseph Roisman, John Vanderspoel and Pat Wheatley. AHB promotes scholarly discussion in Ancient History and ancillary fields (such as epigraphy, papyrology, and numismatics) by publishing articles and notes on any aspect of the ancient world from the Near East to Late Antiquity.
    [Show full text]
  • Companion Cavalry and the Macedonian Heavy Infantry
    THE ARMY OP ALEXANDER THE GREAT %/ ROBERT LOCK IT'-'-i""*'?.} Submitted to satisfy the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. in the School of History in the University of Leeds. Supervisor: Professor E. Badian Date of Submission: Thursday 14 March 1974 IMAGING SERVICES NORTH X 5 Boston Spa, Wetherby </l *xj 1 West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ. * $ www.bl.uk BEST COPY AVAILABLE. TEXT IN ORIGINAL IS CLOSE TO THE EDGE OF THE PAGE ABSTRACT The army with which Alexander the Great conquered the Persian empire was "built around the Macedonian Companion cavalry and the Macedonian heavy infantry. The Macedonian nobility were traditionally fine horsemen, hut the infantry was poorly armed and badly organised until the reign of Alexander II in 369/8 B.C. This king formed a small royal standing army; it consisted of a cavalry force of Macedonian nobles, which he named the 'hetairoi' (or Companion]! cavalry, and an infantry body drawn from the commoners and trained to fight in phalangite formation: these he called the »pezetairoi» (or foot-companions). Philip II (359-336 B.C.) expanded the kingdom and greatly increased the manpower resources for war. Towards the end of his reign he started preparations for the invasion of the Persian empire and levied many more Macedonians than had hitherto been involved in the king's wars. In order to attach these men more closely to himself he extended the meaning of the terms »hetairol» and 'pezetairoi to refer to the whole bodies of Macedonian cavalry and heavy infantry which served under him on his campaigning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alexander-Achilles Connection: the Historical Dimension
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Best of the Macedonians: Alexander as Achilles in Arrian, Curtius, and Plutarch Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/76s9x3jv Author Vorhis, Justin Grant Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles The Best of the Macedonians: Alexander as Achilles in Arrian, Curtius, and Plutarch A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Classics by Justin Grant Vorhis 2017 © Copyright by Justin Grant Vorhis 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Best of the Macedonians: Alexander as Achilles in Arrian, Curtius, and Plutarch by Justin Grant Vorhis Doctor of Philosophy in Classics University of California, Los Angeles, 2017 Professor Kathryn Anne Morgan, Chair This dissertation concerns the connection between Alexander the Great (356-323 B.C.), the famous Macedonian king, and Achilles, the preeminent Greek hero of the Trojan War. As scholars have long recognized, Alexander’s connection to Achilles represents both a historical and a literary phenomenon: Alexander not only portrayed himself as a second Achilles, but was also portrayed as such by those who wrote about him. While scholars have traditionally concentrated on the connection’s historical dimension, I concentrate in this study on its literary dimension (the Achilles motif), taking Arrian, Curtius, and Plutarch, the three extant Alexander historians
    [Show full text]
  • ATLAS of CLASSICAL HISTORY
    ATLAS of CLASSICAL HISTORY EDITED BY RICHARD J.A.TALBERT London and New York First published 1985 by Croom Helm Ltd Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003. © 1985 Richard J.A.Talbert and contributors All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Atlas of classical history. 1. History, Ancient—Maps I. Talbert, Richard J.A. 911.3 G3201.S2 ISBN 0-203-40535-8 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-71359-1 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN 0-415-03463-9 (pbk) Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data Also available CONTENTS Preface v Northern Greece, Macedonia and Thrace 32 Contributors vi The Eastern Aegean and the Asia Minor Equivalent Measurements vi Hinterland 33 Attica 34–5, 181 Maps: map and text page reference placed first, Classical Athens 35–6, 181 further reading reference second Roman Athens 35–6, 181 Halicarnassus 36, 181 The Mediterranean World: Physical 1 Miletus 37, 181 The Aegean in the Bronze Age 2–5, 179 Priene 37, 181 Troy 3, 179 Greek Sicily 38–9, 181 Knossos 3, 179 Syracuse 39, 181 Minoan Crete 4–5, 179 Akragas 40, 181 Mycenae 5, 179 Cyrene 40, 182 Mycenaean Greece 4–6, 179 Olympia 41, 182 Mainland Greece in the Homeric Poems 7–8, Greek Dialects c.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander the Great and the Hellenistic Age
    Macquarie University Department of Ancient History 2nd Semester, 2011. AHIS 241 / 341 AlexanderAlexander thethe GreatGreat andand thethe HellenisticHellenistic AgeAge Unit Outline, Schedule, Tutorial Materials and Bibliography 1 Contents: Unit Introduction and Requirements p. 3 Unit Schedule: Lecture and Tutorial topics p. 9 Map 1: Alexander's March of Conquest. p. 11 Weekly Tutorial Materials p. 12 Map 2: Alexander's Successors, 303 B.C. p. 17 Map 3: The 3rd Century World of Alexander’s Successors p. 18 Map 4: The Background to the Maccabean Revolt p. 27 Unit Main Bibliography p. 32 2 Macquarie University Department of Ancient History 2011 AHIS 241 / 341: Alexander the Great and the Hellenistic Age. UNIT INTRODUCTION This Unit on Alexander the Great and the ‘Hellenistic Age’ will begin with the political situation in Fourth Century Greece and the rise of Macedon. It will focus first on the career of Alexander the Great, and the interpretation of a number of key episodes in his life. The aim will be to build up an overall picture of his motives and achievements, and the consequences of his extraordinary conquests for later history. The focus will then turn to the break up of his ‘Empire’ at his death, and the warfare among his successors which led to the creation of the great rival kingdoms of the Hellenistic period. The Unit will be primarily a study in cultural history, set against the background of the political history of the Mediterranean world. It will not be tied to an event-by-event account of the post- Classical Greek world, but will focus also on the history of ideas and institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Murder of Perdiccas and the River Crossing in Ancient Macedonia*
    Karanos 1, 2018 87-106 Death on the Nile: The murder of Perdiccas and the river crossing in Ancient Macedonia* by Antonio Ignacio Molina Marín Universidad de Alcalá de Henares [email protected] ABSTRACT The death of Perdiccas, son of Orontes, during his invasion of Egypt is a fact hardly understandable, so that we can find different explanations for this event. The main goal of this paper is to establish a connection between Perdiccas’ death and the importance, meaning of rivers and its crossing for the ancient Macedonians. Indeed, rivers were related to kingship. This fact is reflected in its relationship with kings of the Balkan geographical area (Polyaen. 4.12.3). Thus, we can find passages in which some of most important mythical characters were begotten by a god-river (Asteropaios, Rhesus, Orpheus, etc). Besides, sometimes even the majesty comes from the river, because the kings were crowned into the river or near one (App. Syr. 56; Justin 15. 4.2- 7). In fact, the founder of the Argead royal house, Perdiccas I, became king after being saved by a river (Hdt. 8. 138). The strong connection between kings and rivers can be perceived during the crossing, because the Macedonian monarchs, especially Alexander the Great, were responsible of this act. In other words, a true king was able to protect his soldiers during the crossing, given his close link with the water. Perdiccas son of Orontes wanted to become king, therefore the disaster of Nile could be understood like ordeal which showed the will of the river. Perdiccas was not considered a true king, while Ptolemy should become one.
    [Show full text]