DOCSLIB.ORG

Palos Verdes Reef Restoration Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Palos Verdes Reef Restoration Project ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PALOS VERDES REEF RESTORATION PROJECT February 22, 2017 LEAD AGENCY: USDC National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration LOCATION: Los Angeles County, California ABSTRACT: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) proposes to implement an offshore rocky-reef habitat restoration project in the vicinity of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, Los Angeles County, California. The restored reef would compensate for effects of past wastewater discharges of DDTs and PCBs on fish habitats on the Palos Verdes Shelf. The reef restoration project would involve the placement of 70,300 tons of quarry rock on 40 acres of sandy ocean bottom within a 69-acre site located 0.3 miles offshore of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes in the vicinity of Bunker Point. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 PROPOSED ACTION AND PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION .... 1 1.1 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER 2 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION ....................................... 5 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Screening Criteria ......................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Location Alternatives .................................................................................................... 5 2.3.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 5 2.3.2 West and East Areas ......................................................................................... 6 2.3.3 West Area Depth Alternatives .......................................................................... 7 2.3.3.1 Shallower Location – 49 to 68 feet deep (15 – 21 m) ........................ 7 2.3.3.2 Deeper Location – 65 to 82 feet deep (20 - 25 m) ............................. 9 2.4 Design Alternatives ....................................................................................................... 9 2.5 No Action Alternative ................................................................................................. 10 CHAPTER 3 NEPA REQUIREMENTS, SCOPE OF ANALYSIS, AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ........................................................................................................................ 11 CHAPTER 4 APPLICABLE LAWS, FEDERAL PERMITS, LICENSES, AND ENTITLEMENTS....................................................................................................................... 13 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 13 4.2 National Environmental Policy Act ............................................................................ 13 4.3 Rivers and Harbors Act ............................................................................................... 13 4.4 Clean Water Act .......................................................................................................... 14 4.5 Coastal Zone Management Act ................................................................................... 14 4.6 Endangered Species Act ............................................................................................. 14 4.7 Marine Mammal Protection Act ................................................................................. 14 4.8 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act ............................... 15 4.9 Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act ............................................................................ 15 CHAPTER 5 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................... 16 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 16 5.2 Physical Environment of the Project Site ................................................................... 16 5.2.1 Geophysical Survey ........................................................................................ 16 5.2.2 Diver-Based Inspections ................................................................................. 18 5.2.3 Light Attenuation ............................................................................................ 18 5.3 Biological Resources .................................................................................................. 19 5.3.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 19 5.3.2 Soft-Bottom Habitat ........................................................................................ 19 5.3.3 Hard-Bottom Habitat ...................................................................................... 20 5.3.4 Rare, Threatened, or Endangered Species ...................................................... 20 5.4 Air Quality .................................................................................................................. 23 5.4.1 Air Pollutants .................................................................................................. 23 5.4.2 Primary Pollutants ........................................................................................... 24 5.4.3 Secondary Pollutants ....................................................................................... 24 i 5.4.4 Greenhouse Gases and Climate Change ......................................................... 26 5.4.5 Regulatory Setting .......................................................................................... 26 5.5 Land Use, Recreation, Aesthetics, and Noise ............................................................. 27 5.5.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 27 5.5.2 Land Use ......................................................................................................... 27 5.5.3 Recreation ....................................................................................................... 28 5.5.3.1 Surfing.............................................................................................. 28 5.5.3.2 Diving .............................................................................................. 28 5.5.3.3 Fishing.............................................................................................. 29 5.5.3.4 Boating ............................................................................................. 30 5.5.3.5 Beach Activities ............................................................................... 30 5.5.4 Land Use Plans and Policies ........................................................................... 30 5.5.4.1 California Coastal Act ...................................................................... 30 5.5.4.2 California Fish and Game Code ....................................................... 31 5.5.4.3 California Ocean Resources Management Act ................................ 31 5.5.4.4 California Ocean Plan ...................................................................... 31 5.5.5 Noise ............................................................................................................... 31 5.5.5.1 Federal Guidelines ........................................................................... 33 5.5.5.2 State of California Guidelines .......................................................... 34 5.5.5.3 California Government Code ........................................................... 34 5.5.5.4 California Department of Public Health Services, Office of Noise Control ............................................................................................. 34 5.5.5.5 County of Los Angeles .................................................................... 35 5.5.5.6 City of Rancho Palos Verde ............................................................. 35 CHAPTER 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ...................................................... 37 6.1 Biological Resources .................................................................................................. 37 6.1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 37 6.1.2 Effects on Bottom Species and Habitat .......................................................... 37 6.1.3 Marine Mammals, Fish, and Birds .................................................................. 38 6.1.3.1 Marine Mammals ............................................................................. 38 6.1.3.2 Special-Status Marine Birds ............................................................ 39 6.1.3.3 Migratory Species ............................................................................ 39 6.1.4 Restoration Effects .......................................................................................... 40 6.1.4.1 Waves and Currents ......................................................................... 40 6.1.4.2 Kelp Entanglement ........................................................................... 40 6.1.4.3 Food Resources ................................................................................ 41 6.1.4.4 Predation .........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Presented By
    RESOLUTION WHEREAS, July 19, 2013 marks the 10th anniversary of the opening of the Port of Los Angeles Waterfront Red Car Line, and WHEREAS, since :its opening on July 19, 2003, the Waterfront Red Car Line has carried nearly one millionpassengers, and WHEREAS, the Waterfront Red Car Line was the first major project to be completed on the San Pedro Waterfront, which now includes the Waterfront Promenade, the Gateway Plaza Fanfare Fountains, the USS IOWA battleship, CRAFTED at the Port of Los Angeles and the Cabrillo Way Marina, and will soon include a new downtown harbor development and a revitalized Ports O'Call Village, and WHEREAS, when the Waterfront Red Car line opened in July, 2003 :itwas the first time that Red Cars had roo in Los Angeles in over 40 years, and WHEREAS, Waterfront Red Cars 500 and 501 are exact replicas of the original Pacific Electric Red Cars that ran to San Pedro in the 1920's, and WHEREAS, Waterfront Red Cars 500 and 501 were constructed using the immense skills and talents of the crafts persons of the Harbor Department's Construction and Maintenance Division, and WHEREAS, the Waterfront Red Cars operate Friday through Sunday every week of the year and are a particularly important transportation link during Port of Los Angeles special events, carrying hundreds ofvis:itors to the Cars and Stripes July 4th event, the Summer Concerts at the fountains and the Port of Los Angeles Lobster Festival, and WHEREAS, the Waterfront Red Cars offer a "trip back in time" to those people who remember the original Red Cars and to those who want to learn about Los Angeles history, and also provide a :fun trolley ride for children of all ages, NOW, 1HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that by adoption of this resolution, the Los Angeles C:ityCouncil, along with the Mayor, hereby commemorates the 10th anniversary ofthe opening of the Port of Los Angeles Waterfront Red Car Line and sends its heartfelt congratulations on this momentous occasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Transit Administration
    Finding of No Significant Impact Grant Applicant: City of Los Angeles Project: Restoration of Historic Streetcar Service in Downtown Los Angeles Project Location: City of Los Angeles, California The Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Restoration of Historic Streetcar Service in Downtown Los Angeles (Project) was prepared in cooperation with the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 United States Code [U.S.C.] 4332); the Federal Transit Laws (49 U.S.C. 5301(e), 5323(b), and 5324(b)); Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 (49 U.S.C. 303); and Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations). FTA is the federal lead agency for the Project under the NEPA. Development of the Project and its environmental review process are being managed through the joint cooperation of the City of Los Angeles (City) Department of Transportation (LADOT), Bureau of Engineering (LABOE), and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro). Additional support is being provided by City Council District 14 and Los Angeles Streetcar Inc. (LASI), an independent non-profit agency. The Project will be constructed in accordance with the design features and mitigation measures presented in the EA. The full text of the EA, prepared by the City of Los Angeles and approved and issued by FTA, is hereby incorporated by reference in this Finding of No Significant Impact. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project proposes to enhance mobility options to residents, employees and visitors of downtown Los Angeles through expanded transit circulation service and as well as support the growth and revitalization of downtown Los Angeles.
    [Show full text]
  • BULLETIN BOARD Metrolink Leases Cars MEMBERS in ACTION
    BULLETIN BOARD The member site links page of our website is being updated, so anyone who would like Our Jan. 10th meeting will be held in the their transit-related website included send auditorium adjacent to our usual meeting the URL to [email protected]. If anyone space. The guest speaker is Alan Mittel• needs a password reset for access to the staedt, formerly the news editor of the L.A. member board, send to the aforementioned Weekly and L.A. CityBeat. His presentation e-mail address your login name and choice will begin at 1 p.m. After the meeting, an of password. ad-hoc committee will meet to discuss pro• posed service changes by Metro and deter• The environmental documents for the pro• mine So.CA.TA's official positions on them. posed extension of the Orange Line along The speaker at our Feb. meeting will be Co• Canoga are posted on the Metro web- nan Cheung, Deputy Executive Officer for site: http://metro. net/projects_studies/ Operations Service Planning and Develop• canoga_corridor /meeti ngs. htm ment at Metro. Fixing Angelinos Stuck in Traffic (FAST) is a The annual holiday banquet held this year non-profit working to implement the recent at Clifton's Cafeteria was a rousing success. RAND report on reducing congestion: Trinkets and door prizes were donated http://www.fastla.org/ ~. ~ ~ by Culver CityBus, MTS, Gold Coast Transit, Torrance Transit, Caltrans Division of Rail, Omnitrans, Santa Monica Big Blue Bus. MEMBERS IN ACTION Foothill Transit and Metro plus Steve Cromser, Dana Gabbard, Dave Snowden, Ken Ruben attended the Metro Westside Carlos Osuna and Mark Strickert.
    [Show full text]
  • A Near-Shore Linear Wave Model with the Mixed Finite Volume and Finite Difference Unstructured Mesh Method
    fluids Article A Near-Shore Linear Wave Model with the Mixed Finite Volume and Finite Difference Unstructured Mesh Method Yong G. Lai 1,* and Han Sang Kim 2 1 Technical Service Center, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO 80225, USA 2 Bay-Delta Office, California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, CA 95814, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-303-445-2560 Received: 5 October 2020; Accepted: 1 November 2020; Published: 5 November 2020 Abstract: The near-shore and estuary environment is characterized by complex natural processes. A prominent feature is the wind-generated waves, which transfer energy and lead to various phenomena not observed where the hydrodynamics is dictated only by currents. Over the past several decades, numerical models have been developed to predict the wave and current state and their interactions. Most models, however, have relied on the two-model approach in which the wave model is developed independently of the current model and the two are coupled together through a separate steering module. In this study, a new wave model is developed and embedded in an existing two-dimensional (2D) depth-integrated current model, SRH-2D. The work leads to a new wave–current model based on the one-model approach. The physical processes of the new wave model are based on the latest third-generation formulation in which the spectral wave action balance equation is solved so that the spectrum shape is not pre-imposed and the non-linear effects are not parameterized. New contributions of the present study lie primarily in the numerical method adopted, which include: (a) a new operator-splitting method that allows an implicit solution of the wave action equation in the geographical space; (b) mixed finite volume and finite difference method; (c) unstructured polygonal mesh in the geographical space; and (d) a single mesh for both the wave and current models that paves the way for the use of the one-model approach.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2016 Board Meeting
    Los Angeles County Metro Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza 3rd Floor Board Room Board Report Los Angeles, CA File #:2015-1662, File Type:Informational Report Agenda Number:62. REGULAR BOARD MEETING JANUARY 28, 2016 SUBJECT: SAN PEDRO RED CAR LINE MOTION RESPONSE ACTION: RECEIVE AND FILE RECOMMENDATION RECEIVE AND FILE response to Motion #39 in September 2015 by Director Knabe on the San Pedro Red Car Line. ISSUE In September 2015, a motion by Director Don Knabe (Attachment A) directed the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to report on items related to the operations of the San Pedro Red Car Line. DISCUSSION A 1990s study of the San Pedro waterfront envisioned significant development along the waterfront, from the Catalina and World Cruise Terminals on the north to Ports O’ Call Village and the 22nd St. / East Channel / West Channel / Los Angeles Harbor on the south. One of the components of this study was for a rail line to operate between the locations. In turn, the Port of Los Angeles (POLA) opened the 1.5 mile Waterfront Red Car Line on July 19, 2003 with four high platform stations serving the World Cruise Center, Downtown San Pedro, Ports O’ Call, and the Marina. Initial operation provided regular service Fridays thru Mondays, using two trolleys from 10am to 6pm and on days when cruise ships were in Port. In 2010, regular service was reduced to Fridays thru Sundays using one trolley car, operating from 12pm to 9pm with a $1 fare for the entire day and free during special events. Findings From 2005 through 2009, annual ridership was reported to have about 103,000 passengers on average.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Wind-Driven Coastal Dynamics II. Estuarine Processes
    I. Wind-driven Coastal Dynamics Emily Shroyer, Oregon State University II. Estuarine Processes Andrew Lucas, Scripps Institution of Oceanography Variability in the Ocean Sea Surface Temperature from NASA’s Aqua Satellite (AMSR-E) 10000 km 100 km 1000 km 100 km www.visibleearth.nasa.Gov Variability in the Ocean Sea Surface Temperature (MODIS) <10 km 50 km 500 km Variability in the Ocean Sea Surface Temperature (Field Infrared Imagery) 150 m 150 m ~30 m Relevant spatial scales range many orders of magnitude from ~10000 km to submeter and smaller Plant DischarGe, Ocean ImaginG LanGmuir and Internal Waves, NRL > 1000 yrs ©Dudley Chelton < 1 sec < 1 mm > 10000 km What does a physical oceanographer want to know in order to understand ocean processes? From Merriam-Webster Fluid (noun) : a substance (as a liquid or gas) tending to flow or conform to the outline of its container need to describe both the mass and volume when dealing with fluids Enterà density (ρ) = mass per unit volume = M/V Salinity, Temperature, & Pressure Surface Salinity: Precipitation & Evaporation JPL/NASA Where precipitation exceeds evaporation and river input is low, salinity is increased and vice versa. Note: coastal variations are not evident on this coarse scale map. Surface Temperature- Net warming at low latitudes and cooling at high latitudes. à Need Transport Sea Surface Temperature from NASA’s Aqua Satellite (AMSR-E) www.visibleearth.nasa.Gov Perpetual Ocean hWp://svs.Gsfc.nasa.Gov/cGi-bin/details.cGi?aid=3827 Es_manG the Circulaon and Climate of the Ocean- Dimitris Menemenlis What happens when the wind blows on Coastal Circulaon the surface of the ocean??? 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Logistics Planner | Digital Edition
    SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT LOGISTICS PLANNER f the “new normal” has taught industry anything, it’s that flexibility is compul- sory in today’s environment. Everywhere you look, forces at play threaten to tip the scales and derail even the most resilient supply chains. Whether it’s accounting for potential labor strife, insulating against natural disasters, confronting regulatory barriers, accessing capacity, or managing inven- tory against uncertain demand, shippers are challenged with finding balance within their organization as they optimize their cost-to-serve. Partnering with the right carrier, technology or logistics provider is one important way you can marshal your supply chain to act as a force equalizer – multiplier even – and tackle these challenges head-on while enhancing velocity and service to your customers. Logistics practitioners turn to transportation and logistics intermediaries for countless rea- sons: to variabilize cost structures, divest non-core business functions, execute supply chain strategies, avert risk, tap new technologies, and manage growth without capital investment. In different ways, supply chain partners can help you replace inventory with information, increase visibility, and more effectively match demand signals to supply. January 2013 • Inbound Logistics 335 This year’s Logistics Planner features an exclusive group of com- segment, type of solutions provided, and more. A number of com- panies across all areas of the supply chain. These “force multipliers” panies have included corporate videos so be sure to check out their have the requisite tools and expertise to aggregate and align your sup- multimedia profiles. ply chain management efforts with go-to-market strategies. They can If you want to download the entire Logistics Planner, point and help create synergies within your transportation and logistics func- click your way to inboundlogistics.com/digital.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind-Induced Waves and Currents in a Nearshore Zone
    CHAPTER 260 Wind-Induced Waves and Currents in a Nearshore Zone Nobuhiro Matsunaga1, Misao Hashida2 and Hiroshi Kawakami3 Abstract Characteristics of waves and currents induced when a strong wind blows shoreward in a nearshore zone have been investigated experimentally. The drag coefficient of wavy surface has been related to the ratio u*a/cP, where u*a is the air friction velocity on the water surface and cP the phase velocity of the predominant wind waves. Though the relation between the frequencies of the predominant waves and fetch is very similar to that for deep water, the fetch-relation of the wave energy is a little complicated because of the wave shoaling and the wave breaking. The dependence of the energy spectra on the frequency /changes from /-5 to/"3 in the high frequency region with increase of the wind velocity. A strong onshore drift current forms along a thin layer near the water surface and the compensating offshore current is induced under this layer. As the wind velocity increases, the offshore current velocity increases and becomes much larger than the wave-induced mass transport velocity which is calculated from Longuet- Higgins' theoretical solution. 1. Introduction When a nearshore zone is under swell weather conditions, the 1 Associate Professor, Department of Earth System Science and Technology, Kyushu University, Kasuga 816, Japan. 2 Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Nippon Bunri University, Oita 870-03, Japan. 3 Graduate student, Department of Earth System Science and Technology, Kyushu University, Kasuga 816, Japan. 3363 3364 COASTAL ENGINEERING 1996 wind Fig.l Sketch of sediment transport process in a nearshore zone under a storm.
    [Show full text]
  • 1D Laboratory Study on Wave-Induced Setup Over A
    1 LES Modeling of Tsunami-like Solitary Wave Processes 2 over Fringing Reefs 3 4 Yu Yao1, 4, Tiancheng He1, Zhengzhi Deng2*, Long Chen1, 3, Huiqun Guo1 5 6 1 School of Hydraulic Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, 7 Changsha, Hunan 410114, China. 8 2 Ocean College, Zhejiang University, Zhoushan, Zhejiang 316021, China. 9 3 Key Laboratory of Water-Sediment Sciences and Water Disaster Prevention of 10 Hunan Province, Changsha 410114, China. 11 4Key Laboratory of Coastal Disasters and Defence of Ministry of Education, 12 Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China 13 14 15 16 * Corresponding author: Zhengzhi Deng 17 E-mail: [email protected] 18 Tel: +86 15068188376 19 1 20 ABSTRACT 21 Many low-lying tropical and sub-tropical reef-fringed coasts are vulnerable to 22 inundation during tsunami events. Hence accurate prediction of tsunami wave 23 transformation and runup over such reefs is a primary concern in the coastal management 24 of hazard mitigation. To overcome the deficiencies of using depth-integrated models in 25 modeling tsunami-like solitary waves interacting with fringing reefs, a three-dimensional 26 (3D) numerical wave tank based on the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) tool 27 OpenFOAM® is developed in this study. The Navier-Stokes equations for two-phase 28 incompressible flow are solved, using the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) method for 29 turbulence closure and the Volume of Fluid (VOF) method for tracking the free surface. 30 The adopted model is firstly validated by two existing laboratory experiments with 31 various wave conditions and reef configurations. The model is then applied to examine 32 the impacts of varying reef morphologies (fore-reef slope, back-reef slope, lagoon width, 33 reef-crest width) on the solitary wave runup.
    [Show full text]
  • 1DH Boussinesq Modeling of Wave Transformation Over Fringing Reefs
    Ocean Engineering 47 (2012) 30–42 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Ocean Engineering journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/oceaneng 1DH Boussinesq modeling of wave transformation over fringing reefs Yu Yao a, Zhenhua Huang a,b,n, Stephen G. Monismith c, Edmond Y.M. Lo a a School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore b Earth Observatory of Singapore (EOS), Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore c Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305-4020, USA article info abstract Article history: To better understand wave transformation process and the associated hydrodynamic characteristics Received 14 May 2011 over fringing coral reefs, we present a numerical study, which is based on one-dimensional (1D) fully Accepted 12 March 2012 nonlinear Boussinesq equations, of the wave-induced setups/setdowns and wave height changes over Editor-in-Chief: A.I. Incecik various fringing reef profiles. An empirical eddy viscosity model is adopted to account for wave breaking and a shock-capturing finite volume (FV)-based solver is employed to ensure the computa- Keywords: tional accuracy and stability for steep reef faces and shallow reef flats. The numerical results are Wave-induced setup compared with a series of published laboratory experiments. Our results show that with an appropriate Wave-induced setdown treatment of boundary conditions and a fine-tuned eddy viscosity model, the full nonlinear Boussinesq Boussinesq equations model can give satisfactory predictions of the wave height as well as the mean water level over various Coral reef hydrodynamics reef profiles with different reef-flat submergences and reef-crest configurations under both mono- Mean water level Wave breaking chromatic and spectral waves.
    [Show full text]
  • MTA Report May 2003
    metro.net: Archives Metro Report Archives May 2003 Articles MTA Report Bulletin Board MTA to Increase Schedule for Metro Gold Line Testing (May 30, 2003) In preparation for the opening of the Metro Gold Line this summer, MTA has begun increased operational testing from Union Station in Los Angeles to Sierra Madre Villa Station in Pasadena. LASD Fare Inspectors Now Aboard Metro Rail (May 29, 2003) Fare inspectors have been deployed on the Metro Red Line this week under a partnership between MTA and the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department to supplement law enforcement on Metro Rail. Transit Police Chief Urges Employees to be Alert (May 28, 2003) With the nation’s terrorist threat alert level now set at “Orange,” Transit Police Chief Dan Finkelstein is asking MTA employees to “maintain a heightened interest in their surroundings.” UPDATE: FY-04 Budget, Fare Restructuring Approved at May Board Meeting Memorial Service Set, May 28, for SCRTD’s John Dyer (May 22, 2003) A memorial service celebrating the life of former SCRTD General Manager John A. Dyer is scheduled Wednesday, May 28. Paleontologists Unearth Mammoth Tusk Fossil on MTA Property (May 21, 2003) Paleontologists working on MTA property have unearthed a small section of a mammoth tusk approximately 10,000 to 70,000 years old. MTA has donated the fossil, which is believed to date to the late Pleistocene era, to the Museum of Natural History of Los Angeles County for study and preservation. FY-04 Budget, Fare Restructuring Lead May Board Agenda (May 20, 2003) Adoption of the FY 2004 budget and a motion to restructure Metro fares for the first time in eight years are likely to dominate Thursday’s MTA Board meeting, but there are other items of interest on the agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • W • 32°38'47.76”N 117°8'52.44”
    public access 32°32’4”N 117°7’22”W • 32°38’47.76”N 117°8’52.44”W • 33°6’14”N 117°19’10”W • 33°22’45”N 117°34’21”W • 33°45’25.07”N 118°14’53.26”W • 33°45’31.13”N 118°20’45.04”W • 33°53’38”N 118°25’0”W • 33°55’17”N 118°24’22”W • 34°23’57”N 119°30’59”W • 34°27’38”N 120°1’27”W • 34°29’24.65”N 120°13’44.56”W • 34°58’1.2”N 120°39’0”W • 35°8’54”N 120°38’53”W • 35°20’50.42”N 120°49’33.31”W • 35°35’1”N 121°7’18”W • 36°18’22.68”N 121°54’5.76”W • 36°22’16.9”N 121°54’6.05”W • 36°31’1.56”N 121°56’33.36”W • 36°58’20”N 121°54’50”W • 36°33’59”N 121°56’48”W • 36°35’5.42”N 121°57’54.36”W • 37°0’42”N 122°11’27”W • 37°10’54”N 122°23’38”W • 37°41’48”N 122°29’57”W • 37°45’34”N 122°30’39”W • 37°46’48”N 122°30’49”W • 37°47’0”N 122°28’0”W • 37°49’30”N 122°19’03”W • 37°49’40”N 122°30’22”W • 37°54’2”N 122°38’40”W • 37°54’34”N 122°41’11”W • 38°3’59.73”N 122°53’3.98”W • 38°18’39.6”N 123°3’57.6”W • 38°22’8.39”N 123°4’25.28”W • 38°23’34.8”N 123°5’40.92”W • 39°13’25”N 123°46’7”W • 39°16’30”N 123°46’0”W • 39°25’48”N 123°25’48”W • 39°29’36”N 123°47’37”W • 39°33’10”N 123°46’1”W • 39°49’57”N 123°51’7”W • 39°55’12”N 123°56’24”W • 40°1’50”N 124°4’23”W • 40°39’29”N 124°12’59”W • 40°45’13.53”N 124°12’54.73”W 41°18’0”N 124°0’0”W • 41°45’21”N 124°12’6”W • 41°52’0”N 124°12’0”W • 41°59’33”N 124°12’36”W Public Access David Horvitz & Ed Steck In late December of 2010 and early Janu- Some articles already had images, in which ary of 2011, I drove the entire California I added mine to them.
    [Show full text]