Download Pdf Version Here

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download Pdf Version Here PRESS FREEDOM STATUS FOR WOMEN JOURNALISTS: APRIL 2021 2021 MONTHLY REPORT ABOUT US The Coalition For Women In Journalism (CFWIJ) is a global organization of support for women journalists. The CFWIJ pioneered mentorship for mid-career women journalists across several countries around the world and is the first organization to focus on the status of free press for women journalists. Our network of individuals and organizations brings together the experience and mentorship necessary to help female career journalists navigate the industry. Our goal is to help develop a strong mechanism where women journalists can work safely and thrive. This report was developed with the support of Craig Newmark Philanthropies. Executive Editor: Kiran Nazish Research: Aimun Faisal, Ceren İskit, Ayesha Khalid, Damla Tarhan Design: Damla Tarhan [email protected] | wwww.womeninjournalism.org | Twitter: @CFWIJ PRESS FREEDOM STATUS FOR WOMEN JOURNALISTS: APRIL 2021 Throughout the month of April, The Coalition For Women In Journalism reported on an astonishing 51 cases of violence against women journalists around the world. The following report presents a detailed survey of the safety violations against women journalists during April 2021. One woman journalist was killed: United States: Journalist Aviva Okeson-Haberman was found dead in her apartment on Friday, April 23, from what appears to be a gunshot wound. Okeson-Haberman was a young radio journalist cherished by her colleagues and friends. The police are investigating the circumstance around her death. While nine were attacked in the field: Turkey: Police intervened in the Boğaziçi University’s student protests which took place today in İstanbul. More than 30 students were detained and many journalists including women reporters were deliberately prevented and brutally attacked by the police. At least four women journalists, who were at the scene, were affected by tear gas and beaten. United States: At least three women journalists who were covering the protests in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota sparked by the fatal shooting of Daunte Wright, a 20- year old Black man, were assaulted by the police. Turkey: Mesopotamia Agency (MA) reporter Diren Yurtsever was physically assaulted by the police while covering the Kobani Trial which took place in Ankara. Lebanon: MTV Lebanon News correspondent Joyce Akiki was attacked by Free Patriotic Movement (FPM) supporters, during her live coverage about the protest between two judge supporters at Palace of Justice in Beirut. Four women journalists received violent threats: Uzbekistan: Agnieszka Pikulicka, journalist and fellow at The Coalition For Women In Journalism, shared images of two cars parked outside her house on April 4. The journalist is facing state-backed intimidation for covering the torture of Miraziz Bazarov, an activist and LGBT rights supporter. Miraziz was brutally tortured on March 29 by radicals, and Agnieszka has followed the details of his treatment. The Philippines: Chiara Zambrano from ABS-CBN, and her news team were on an assignment in the west Philippines sea close to Palawan province when they were threatened by Chinese naval authorities. France: Nadiya Lazzouni received an anonymous letter at her private residence. The letter was replete with sexist and Islamophobic slurs and included death threats. Nadiya believes that she was targeted for her religious visibility and expressed great fear about the implications of the perpetrator's access to her residential address. Northern Ireland: Patricia Devlin was again targeted on social media after her coverage of the actions of the Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF). This has become a regular occurence. Devlin, who is a crime reporter has faced similar threats in the past, any time she reported on the loyalist groups operating within Ireland. And 15 faced detention: Myanmar: Journalist Thin Thin Aung was abducted by the state on April 8, and is currently in state custody. Following her detention, the state forces raided her home, seized her belongings, and destroyed all her journalistic work. Myanmar: Myo Myat Myat Pan, an ex-employee of Myitkyina News Journal, was abducted by police authorities on April 14. The journalist was reportedly arrested on orders from the military council. Russia: Russian authorities raided the homes of four student journalists, two of whom are young women, as well as the homes of their parents. The journalists were targeted for demanding their civil right to protest and have since been detained on criminal charges. Kyrgyzstan: Four journalists, including two women journalists, were detained by the police on three separate occasions during their coverage of the national elections. At least one of these reporters was also attacked in the field by a civilian. Turkey: Journalists Serpil Ünal and Kardelen Yoğungan were detained for covering the press statement held by Sinbo workers who were dismissed because of their union membership in Istanbul. The journalists were released after their statements were taken. Russia: Journalist Katya Arenina was detained by security forces in the region while she was investigating reports about torture in the penal facility present there. While the journalist was released shortly after, this was clearly an attempt to intimidate her and discourage her from pursuing the story. Russia: Russian law enforcement authorities detained at least three women journalists from different parts of the country while they were covering pro-Navalny protests. Yulia Suguyeva, Bariyat Idrisova, Ksenia Klochkova were detained in Makhachkala and St. Petersburg. Turkey: After four-day detention, journalist Beritan Canözer was called to the court without prior notice and the prosecutor requested her arrest. Due to the confidential nature of the investigation, no further information was given to her relatives and lawyers. Turkey: Police attacked the gathering of the Sinbo and SML Label workers to ban May 1, Labour Day organisations. 40 people were detained, including Jin News reporter Sena Dollar and Kızıl Bayrak reporter Kardelen Yoğungan. The reporters were also battered by the police. Both journalists were released after their testimonies were taken. 11 women journalists were legally harassed: Colombia: In the latest development of the defamation case against Vicky Dávila, the Labor Cassation Chamber of the Colombian Supreme Court has reversed the journalist’s once-successful appeal. The Supreme Court upheld the previous ruling of the appellate court on October 15, 2020, which ordered the journalist to pay over $43,421 in damages to the family of a police colonel. Turkey: The first hearing of the trial against the imprisoned journalists Şehriban Abi and Nazan Sala was held in Van. Journalist Zeynep Durgut who covered the case was also indicted. The hearing against Abi and Sala started with restrictions against many journalists and NGOs who wanted to follow the case and ended with journalists’ release. The court ruled the release of all imprisoned journalists conditionally. Turkey: The first hearing of the trial against journalist Melis Alphan on the charge of "spreading terrorist propaganda" was held in Istanbul. The court postponed the next hearing to 21 May 2021. Turkey: In the third hearing of the trial against Gazete Yolculuk reporter Buse Söğütlü on terrorism charges, the court ordered the trial prosecutor to prepare its judicial opinion and demanded an additional defence from Buse on the allegation of ‘insulting a public official. The next hearing was postponed to September 14, 2021. Turkey: The 13th hearing of the trial against journalists Semiha Şahin and Pınar Gayıp was held in İstanbul. The court ruled incomplete elements of the case-file to be completed and adjourned the trial to July 14, 2021. Russia: Mariya Nuykina was detained, arrested, and fined by Russian police authorities for covering protest movements. In response, Mariya filed a court appeal against the convictions. If accepted, the appeal will protect her from similar state persecution in the future and clear her of all charges. However, Mariya believes the court is unlikely to overturn the charges. Turkey: The second hearing of the trial against Yeni Yaşam Newspaper Managing Editor İnci Aydın on the charge of "spreading terrorist propaganda for an organization" was held in Istanbul. The court ruled to acquit the journalist. Hong Kong: Award-winning freelance producer Bao Choy was convicted on April 22, by a Hong Kong court for submitting false statements to obtain public records. The journalist had obtained the data to determine the police handling of riots against pro-democracy demonstrations and media in July 2019. Turkey: First hearing of the trial against journalists Rojda Aydın, Nurcan Yalçın and Halime Parlak over the charges with ‘being participants in a prohibited gathering, defying police orders to disband’ was held in Mardin. The court adjourned the next hearing to October 13. Four women journalists were physically assaulted in the field: Turkey: Three female journalists covering the press release of the May-Day Platform in Istanbul were physically assaulted and verbally harassed by the police. They were also deliberately prevented from filming the gathering. Mexico: Correspondent for Multimedios Television, Vianca Maleny Trevino Nevejar, was assaulted by police and detained in the early morning on Friday, April 9. The police illegally seized her belongings and tried to access her online accounts. One case of sexual harassment came to light: Kenya: Journalist Judie
Recommended publications
  • China Media Bulletin
    Issue No. 154: May 2021 CHINA MEDIA BULLETIN Headlines ANALYSIS The Gutting of Hong Kong’s Public Broadcaster P2 IN THE NEWS • Regulators “clean up” internet ahead of CCP anniversary alongside censorship of Oscars, Bible apps, and Weibo P5 • Surveillance updates: Personal data-protection law advances, Apple compromises on user data, citizen backlash P6 • Criminal charges for COVID commentary, Uyghur religious expression, Tibetan WeChat use P7 • Hong Kong: Website blocks, netizen arrests, journalist beating, and Phoenix TV ownership change P9 • Beyond China: Beijing’s COVID-19 media strategy, waning propaganda impact in Europe, new US regulations to enhance transparency P10 FEATURED PUSHBACK Netizens demand transparency on Chengdu student’s death P12 WHAT TO WATCH FOR P13 TAKE ACTION P14 IMAGE OF THE MONTH Is RTHK History? This cartoon published on April 5 by a Hong Kong visual arts teacher is part of a series called “Hong Kong Today.” It depicts a fictional Hong Kong Museum of History, which includes among its exhibits two institutions that have been critical to the city’s freedom, but are being undermined by Chinese and Hong Kong government actions. The first is the Basic Law, the mini-constitution guaranteeing freedom of expression and other fundamental rights; the other is Radio Television Hong Kong (RTHK), the once-respected public broadcaster now facing a government takeover. The teacher who posted the cartoon is facing disciplinary action from the Education Department. Credit: @vawongsir Instagram Visit http://freedomhou.se/cmb_signup or email [email protected] to subscribe or submit items. CHINA MEDIA BULLETIN: MAY 2021 ANALYSIS The Gutting of Hong Kong’s Public Broadcaster By Sarah Cook A government takeover of Radio Television Hong Kong has far-reaching Sarah Cook is the implications.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewed at the Sideline: Yeah, Nah
    China-haters run for cover as Newscorp ‘virus warfare’ propaganda implodes 17 May—At no point since the Canberra intelligence establishment and its media puppets commenced their anti-China propaganda campaign in earnest some five years ago have they put forth any meaningful evidence to back up their accusations against Beijing. On the contrary, it would be fair to say that their proofs have grown ever flimsier in proportion to the scale of atrocity alleged. Newscorp’s attempt this month to revive the “Wuhan lab leak” theory on the origin of the COVID-19 coronavirus may (we hope) be the nadir of this trend, being so transparently stupid that it has been roundly rejected by other news agencies, and even disowned by some of the very “experts” it cites, whose own outlandish China scare-stories have already strained credulity to its limits, and who have gone strangely quiet since. It is early days yet, and this will likely be only a temporary lull; but in the event the dying Anglo-American empire to which Australia is annexed doesn’t take the world down with it in a thermonuclear holocaust, some future historian may pinpoint 8 May 2021 as the day our nation’s media-inflated bubble of anti-China hysteria burst, and the Australian newspaper’s front-page “exclusive” that day, headlined “‘Virus warfare’ in China files”, as the pin that pricked it. Penned by the Australian’s “investigations writer” Sharri Markson, the article claims that “Chinese military scientists discussed the weaponisation of SARS [severe acute respiratory syndrome] coronaviruses
    [Show full text]
  • Family De-Planning: the Coercive Campaign to Drive Down Indigenous Birth-Rates in Xinjiang 1
    Family de-planning The coercive campaign to drive down indigenous birth-rates in Xinjiang Nathan Ruser and James Leibold S OF AS AR PI E S Y T Y R T A T N E E G Y W T Policy Brief 2 0 1 01 - 20 2 Report No. 44/2021 About the authors Nathan Ruser is a researcher with ASPI’s International Cyber Policy Centre. James Leibold is a non-resident Senior Fellow with ASPI’s International Cyber Policy Centre. Acknowledgements We would like to thank our external peer reviewers, Dr Timothy Grose, Dr Adrian Zenz, Dr Stanley Toops, and Peter Mattis, for their comments and helpful suggestions. Darren Byler, Timothy Grose and Vicky Xu also generously shared with us a range of primary source materials. We’re also grateful for the comments and assistance provided within ASPI by Michael Shoebridge, Fergus Hanson, Danielle Cave, Kelsey Munro and Samantha Hoffman and for crucial research assistance from Tilla Hoja and Daria Impiombato. This research report forms part of the Xinjiang Data Project, which brings together rigorous empirical research on the human rights situation of Uyghurs and other non-Han nationalities in the XUAR. It focuses on a core set of topics, including mass internment camps; surveillance and emerging technologies; forced labour and supply chains; the CCP’s “re-education” campaign and deliberate cultural destruction and other human rights issues. The Xinjiang Data Project is produced by researchers at ASPI’s International Cyber Policy Centre (ICPC) in partnership with a range of global experts who conduct data-driven, policy-relevant research.
    [Show full text]
  • An Informed and Independent Voice: ASPI, 2001-2021
    An informed and independent voice ASPI, 2001–2021 Graeme Dobell An informed and independent voice ASPI, 2001–2021 Graeme Dobell About ASPI The Australian Strategic Policy Institute was formed in 2001 as an independent, non‑partisan think tank. Its core aim is to provide the Australian Government with fresh ideas on Australia’s defence, security and strategic policy choices. ASPI is responsible for informing the public on a range of strategic issues, generating new thinking for government and harnessing strategic thinking internationally. ASPI’s sources of funding are identified in our annual report, online at www.aspi.org.au and in the acknowledgements section of individual publications. ASPI remains independent in the content of the research and in all editorial judgements. It is incorporated as a company, and is governed by a Council with broad membership. ASPI’s core values are collegiality, originality & innovation, quality & excellence and independence. ASPI’s publications—including this report—are not intended in any way to express or reflect the views of the Australian Government. The opinions and recommendations in this report are published by ASPI to promote public debate and understanding of strategic and defence issues. They reflect the personal views of the author(s) and should not be seen as representing the formal position of ASPI on any particular issue. Important disclaimer This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in relation to the subject matter covered. It is provided with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering any form of professional or other advice or services. No person should rely on the contents of this publication without first obtaining advice from a qualified professional.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Human Rights in China: the Case of Xinjiang Darren Byler Postdoctoral
    Working Paper for the Penn Project on the Future of U.S.-China Relations Human Rights in China: The Case of Xinjiang Darren Byler Postdoctoral Fellow, University of Colorado, Boulder This memo examines the current crisis of human rights in China through the paradigmatic example of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region’s reeducation camp system. I show how this system fits into an older Maoist legacy of human rights in China and the way this legacy produced majority-valorized discourses of ‘security’ and ‘ethnic harmony.’ I then examine how the discourse of counter-terrorism and extremism fits into this legacy and the way it assigned an ‘ethno-racialized other’ slot to Muslims in China, particularly Uyghurs, following September 11, 2001. I examine the way forms of countering violent extremism and counter-terrorism were attached to the entire population of nearly 13.5 million Uyghurs and Kazakhs1 in the Xinjiang region resulting in one of the most horrific human rights crisis in the contemporary world. Simultaneously, laws which equate democratic protest with terrorism have been applied in Hong Kong. The crisis of human rights in China has been exacerbated by the withdrawal of the United States from the U.N. Human Rights Council and other global coalitions. It has also been fostered by a global Islamophobia in which the United States has played a key role. To begin to mitigate this situation, I argue that future U.S. policy should work to build human rights coalitions with both wealthy allies and with nations in the global South. An important aspect of this coalition building is to reverse anti-refugee and anti-Muslim immigration policies at a global scale.
    [Show full text]
  • China Media Bulletin
    Issue No. 153: April 2021 CHINA MEDIA BULLETIN Headlines ANALYSIS The CCP Is Retooling Its Censorship System at a Brisk Pace in 2021 P2 IN THE NEWS • State propaganda machines promote Xinjiang cotton; boycotts launched to counter allegations of forced labor P5 • Surveillance updates: Amid data leaks and police-sponsored app, Chinese users raise new privacy concerns P7 • Harsh penalties in free expression cases, or for members of ethnic and religious minority groups P8 • Hong Kong: Media outlets, journalists, and public broadcaster face new attacks on press freedom P9 • Beyond China: “Wolf Warrior” diplomacy, tech footprint in Asia, CGTN woes, self-censorship in Australia P11 FEATURED PUSHBACK Women’s rights activists’ fight against online bullying and censorship gains support P13 WHAT TO WATCH FOR P14 TAKE ACTION P15 IMAGE OF THE MONTH Wen Jiabao Censored This image from 2012 shows former premier Wen Jiabao and his mother, who passed away in December 2020. On April 17, censors deleted an article penned by Wen about his mother from WeChat and other sites, while state media refused to publish it. The emotional piece offered rare insight into the former leader’s personal thoughts, and was likely censored due to implicit criticism of Xi Jinping, with Wen writing, “China, in my vision, should be a country of justice and fairness.” Credit: China Digital Times Visit http://freedomhou.se/cmb_signup or email [email protected] to subscribe or submit items. CHINA MEDIA BULLETIN: APRIL 2021 ANALYSIS The CCP Is Retooling Its Censorship System at a Brisk Pace in 2021 By Angeli Datt Earlier this month, a video-gaming industry site revealed that the Chinese Communist and Sarah Cook Party (CCP) Central Propaganda Department had introduced a trial review and scoring Angeli Datt is a system for online games produced in China, effective April 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibitor's Manual
    THE 3rd CHINA INTERNATIONAL IMPORT EXPO EXHIBITOR'S MANUAL 2020 5th-10th.NOV 国National 家 会 Exhibition 展 中 心( 上 海 ) and Convention Center (Shanghai) CONTENTS 01 General Information of the EXPO Basic Information ........................................................................................ 15 Expo Contact List ...................................................................................... 17 Venue & Supporting Facilities..................................................................... 21 02 Rules and Regulations General Rules............................................................................................. 31 Credential Management ............................................................................. 31 Basic Rules................................................................................................. 31 03 Enterprise & Business Exhibition Official Constructors ................................................................................... 39 Rental of Supporting Facilities .................................................................... 40 Standard Booth........................................................................................... 41 Design and Building of Special Exhibition Booth ........................................ 42 Work Overtime ............................................................................................ 44 Schemes for Exhibition Liability Insurance Service .................................... 44 Inspection and Acceptance of the Booth Site ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Viewees Spoke of Overcoming Homesickness, Adapting to Their New Environment and Learning New Skills
    ASPI: forced labour hypocrites and academic fraudsters The Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) published its dramatic allegations of Uyghur Muslim forced labour in a much-lauded 1 March 2020 report, Uyghurs for Sale. The report alleged “a new phase in China’s social re-engineering campaign targeting minority citizens”, claiming it had exposed “new evidence” that a number of factories were “using forced Uyghur labour under a state-sponsored labour transfer scheme that is tainting the global supply chain”. A 26 March 2020 Grayzone report nailed the agenda behind ASPI’s claims in its headline that charged forced labour allegations about Chinese Uyghurs are “brought to you by US, NATO, arms industry to drive Cold War PR blitz”. ASPI’s dubious sources Uyghurs for Sale lead author, ASPI researcher Vicky Xu, told the ABC on 2 March: “Officials and private brokers receive money for every Uyghur person they manage to transfer. The recipient companies receive a cash inducement for every Uyghur they take. … Everyone involved in this transfer scheme benefits except for Uyghur workers.” Xu’s claims are repeated in ASPI’s report, which essentially alleges a bounty program to incentivise industrialscale forced labour. However, ASPI’s supporting reference doesn’t back up the allegations. In fact, it reveals the subsidy is paid primarily to cover expenses incurred by labour hire companies and job placement agencies, while Xu’s “cash inducement” is part of a regulated labour hire program, incentivised to significantly increase the workers’ income and achieve successful long-term employment. This is a pattern. Tracing back ASPI’s references reveals that relevant information is ignored, and sources are interpreted in extreme bad faith, or are misrepresented in a manner so misleading it can only be described as academic fraud.
    [Show full text]
  • TFF-Smokescreen Report.Pages
    Behind The Smokescreen An Analysis of the West’s Destructive China Cold War Agenda and Why It Must Stop TFF • The Transnational Foundation for Peace & Future Research 1 Behind The Smokescreen An Analysis of the West’s Destructive China Cold War Agenda and Why It Must Stop Gordon Dumoulin Jan Oberg Thore Vestby TFF • The Transnational Foundation for Peace & Future Research Lund, Sweden • [email protected] • The Transnational • Ph +46 (0)738 525200 • August 6, 2021 • © TFF 2021 Front-page photo 丁亦然 Unsplash 2 Table of Content Introduction The China Cold War Agenda as Dangerous Decline and Decay 6 Executive Summary 15 Chapter 1 China and the West - Competition Not Cooperation 19 Chapter 2 The Xinjiang Genocide Accusations As Agenda - and its sources 26 2.1 The compact Western mainstream media silence 27 2.2 The six primary sources behind the Xinjiang genocide documentation 29 2.3 Problematic issues, materials and producers 30 2.3.1 The number issue How many Uyghurs are in how many detention camps and facilities? 31 2.3.2 Funding and policy affiliations Where does the funding come from to produce the Xinjiang Genocide accusations? What political interests are behind? 36 2.3.3 Databases and witness statements The Victim Databases and the Credibility of witnesses 39 2.3.4 Politicisation, weaponisation and Adrian Zenz On human rights, there is only one interpretation possible 42 2.3.5 ASPI The Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) 46 Chapter 3 Some facts about the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR): History and terrorism 52 3
    [Show full text]
  • Double-Edged Sword China’S Sharp Power Exploitation of Emerging Technologies
    April 2021 SHARP POWER AND DEMOCRATIC RESILIENCE SERIES Double-Edged Sword China’s Sharp Power Exploitation of Emerging Technologies by Samantha Hoffman ABOUT THE SHARP POWER AND DEMOCRATIC RESILIENCE SERIES As globalization deepens integration between democracies and autocracies, the compromising effects of sharp power—which impairs free expression, neutralizes independent institutions, and distorts the political environment—have grown apparent across crucial sectors of open societies. The Sharp Power and Democratic Resilience series is an effort to systematically analyze the ways in which leading authoritarian regimes seek to manipulate the political landscape and censor independent expression within democratic settings, and to highlight potential civil society responses. ABOUT THE AUTHOR This initiative examines emerging issues in four crucial arenas relating to the integrity and vibrancy of democratic systems: Dr. Samantha Hoffman is a senior analyst with the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s International Cyber • Challenges to free expression and the integrity of the Policy Centre. In 2018, she was a visiting fellow at the media and information space Mercator Institute for China Studies in Berlin. She also • Threats to intellectual inquiry worked as a consultant for the International Institute for • Contestation over the principles that govern technology Strategic Studies and IHS Markit. Her research explores the domestic and global implications of the Chinese • Leverage of state-driven capital for political and often Communist Party’s approach to state security and corrosive purposes offers new ways of thinking about how to understand The present era of authoritarian resurgence is taking place during and respond to China’s technology-enhanced political a protracted global democratic downturn that has degraded and social control efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Patriotic Sentiment Among Chinese Students Abroad in the Era of Xi Ji
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Imagined Communities: Patriotic Sentiment Among Chinese Students Abroad In the Era of Xi Jinping A master’s thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Anthropology by Eric Andrew Sinski 2020 © Copyright by Eric Andrew Sinski 2020 ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS Imagined Communities: Patriotic Sentiment Among Chinese Students Abroad In the Era of Xi Jinping by Eric Andrew Sinski Master of Philosophy in Anthropology University of California, Los Angeles, 2020 Professor Yunxiang Yan, Chair Using a combination of participant-observation and semi-structured, person-centered interview techniques, this thesis examines nationalist subjectivities and patriotic sentiment among Chinese university students abroad during the late Xi Jinping era. By approaching this phenomenon from an anthropological, bottom-up approach, this paper concludes that rather than tempering their nationalist sentiment through exposure to other cultures and political systems, ii time spent abroad actually increases the magnitude and salience of patriotic sentiments, as well as reshapes Chinese nationalist subjectivities in ways that are unique, but whose roots can be found in the social facts and narrative lens imparted during Patriotic Education Campaign initiated by the Chinese Communist Party following the political turmoil of the 1980s, as well as in the lived experiences of Chinese students abroad today. Tracing back to its incipient roots during pre-Dynastic China, this paper contributes to anthropological studies of nationalism by arguing that nationalism, rather than being understood as a broad phenomenon that arises only when certain universal conditions are met, must be understood in a situated, localized context and centered in the lived experiences of everyday people who at once shape, and are shaped by nationalistic narratives and sentiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide in China: Uighur Re-Education Camps and International Response
    Immigration and Human Rights Law Review Volume 3 Issue 1 Article 2 2021 Genocide in China: Uighur Re-education Camps and International Response Julia Stern University of Cincinnati College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.uc.edu/ihrlr Part of the Human Rights Law Commons Recommended Citation Stern, Julia (2021) "Genocide in China: Uighur Re-education Camps and International Response," Immigration and Human Rights Law Review: Vol. 3 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarship.law.uc.edu/ihrlr/vol3/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications. It has been accepted for inclusion in Immigration and Human Rights Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Genocide in China: Uighur Re-education Camps and International Response By: Julia Stern1 Uighurs in the autonomous region of Xinjiang, China, have long faced discrimination at the hands of the Chinese Communist Party (“CCP”).2 At the time of this writing, over the past five years, the oppression of Uighurs and other Muslim minorities has escalated to crimes against humanity and genocide.3 Despite ongoing international pressure and sanctions to end these human rights violations, the situation in Xinjiang continues to worsen, evidenced by new information leaked or reported by former detainees.4 China has also begun exerting its international power to pressure foreign countries to report Uighurs and has warned other countries against attending the United Nations Human Rights Council side panel on Uighur rights.5 To date, the Chinese government has concealed the exact number of Uighurs detained in Xinjiang “re-education” camps and their treatment within these camps.6 1 Associate Member, (2020-2021), Immigration and& Human Rights Law Review, University of Cincinnati.
    [Show full text]