Annex V : Environment the Feasibility Study of the Flood Control Project for the Lower Cagayan River in the Republic of the Philippines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annex V : Environment the Feasibility Study of the Flood Control Project for the Lower Cagayan River in the Republic of the Philippines The Feasibility Study of the Flood Control Project for the Lower Cagayan River in the Republic of the Philippines Final Report Supporting Report ANNEX V : ENVIRONMENT THE FEASIBILITY STUDY OF THE FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT FOR THE LOWER CAGAYAN RIVER IN THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES FINAL REPORT Volume III-1 SUPPORTING REPORT ANNEX V ENVIRONMENT Table of Contents Page CHAPTER 1 NATURAL AND PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT ................................ V-1 1.1 Terrestrial Flora................................................................................................. V-1 1.1.1 Inventory Based on Secondary Data..................................................... V-1 1.1.2 The Results of On-site Survey.............................................................. V-1 1.2 Terrestrial Fauna................................................................................................ V-2 1.2.1 Inventory Based on Secondary Data..................................................... V-2 1.2.2 The Results of On-site Survey.............................................................. V-2 1.3 Protected Area................................................................................................... V-3 1.4 Aquatic Ecology................................................................................................ V-4 1.4.1 Inventory Based on Secondary Data..................................................... V-4 1.4.2 The Results of On-site Survey.............................................................. V-4 1.5 Water Quality .................................................................................................... V-5 1.5.1 Water Quality Criteria.......................................................................... V-5 1.5.2 Classification of Rivers in the Cagayan Valley..................................... V-5 1.5.3 Results of Water Quality Measurements by DENR and BRS................ V-5 1.5.4 Results of Water Quality Sampling ...................................................... V-6 1.6 Air Quality and Noise........................................................................................ V-7 1.6.1 Ambient Air......................................................................................... V-7 1.6.2 Noise ................................................................................................... V-7 CHAPTER 2 SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT ................................................................. V-9 2.1 Fisheries............................................................................................................ V-9 2.1.1 The Fishing Industry of Region 2......................................................... V-9 2.1.2 Fish Catch in the Cagayan River.......................................................... V-9 2.1.3 Fishing Practices.................................................................................. V-10 2.2 Navigation......................................................................................................... V-10 2.3 Water Rights...................................................................................................... V-10 2.4 Historical and Cultural Heritage and Recreational Spots.................................... V-11 2.5 Public Health and Sanitation.............................................................................. V-12 2.5.1 Vital Health Indices ............................................................................. V-12 2.5.2 Environmental Health and Sanitation................................................... V-12 2.6 Education .......................................................................................................... V-13 2.6.1 Current Situation on Performance Indicators........................................ V-13 2.6.2 Information from an Elementary School Teacher ................................. V-15 2.6.3 Countermeasures Being Undertaken for Reducing Drop Out Rate..................................................................................................... V-15 2.7 Minority Tribes (Indigenous People).................................................................. V-16 2.8 Informal Settlers (Squatters).............................................................................. V-17 2.8.1 Cagayan............................................................................................... V-18 V - i 2.8.2 Isabela ................................................................................................. V-18 2.8.3 Nueva Vizcaya..................................................................................... V-18 2.8.4 Quirino ................................................................................................ V-19 2.8.5 Ifugao .................................................................................................. V-19 2.8.6 Kalinga, Apayao and Mountain Province ............................................. V-19 2.9 Poverty Problem................................................................................................ V-19 2.9.1 Current Situation on Poverty................................................................ V-19 2.9.2 Results of MBN Survey....................................................................... V-20 2.9.3 The Results of Interview Survey .......................................................... V-20 CHAPTER 3 NATURAL AND PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.................................................................................... V-22 3.1 The Relationship between Project Activities and Impacts .................................. V-22 3.2 Terrestrial Flora and Fauna ................................................................................ V-23 3.2.1 Terrestrial Flora ................................................................................... V-23 3.2.2 Terrestrial Fauna.................................................................................. V-24 3.3 Protected Area................................................................................................... V-25 3.4 Aquatic Ecology................................................................................................ V-25 3.5 Water Quality .................................................................................................... V-27 CHAPTER 4 SOCIO-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT..................................... V-29 4.1 Navigation......................................................................................................... V-29 4.2 Historical and Cultural Heritage ........................................................................ V-30 4.3 Minority Tribes.................................................................................................. V-30 4.4 Public Health and Sanitation.............................................................................. V-31 CHAPTER 5 NATURAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ............................... V-33 5.1 EIS Legislation and Rationale of Conduct of EIA.............................................. V-33 5.1.1 EIS Legislation of the Philippines........................................................ V-33 5.1.2 Rationale of Conduct of EIA................................................................ V-34 5.2 Project Description and Impact Activities .......................................................... V-34 5.3 Prediction of the Impacts................................................................................... V-36 5.3.1 Flood Control Project........................................................................... V-36 5.3.2 Irrigation Development Project ............................................................ V-38 5.4 Mitigation Measures.......................................................................................... V-39 5.4.1 Flood Control Project........................................................................... V-39 5.4.2 Irrigation Development Project ............................................................ V-39 5.5 Evaluation of Impacts on Natural Environment.................................................. V-39 5.5.1 Methodology (Evaluation Factor/Index)............................................... V-39 5.5.2 The Results of Impact Evaluation ........................................................ V-40 CHAPTER 6 SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ................................... V-42 6.1 Legislation on SIA of the Philippines................................................................. V-42 6.2 Project Description and Impact Activities .......................................................... V-42 6.3 Results of Basic Social Assessment Survey........................................................ V-43 6.3.1 Household Characteristics.................................................................... V-43 6.3.2 Income and Source of Livelihood ........................................................ V-43 6.3.3 Type and Size of Houses...................................................................... V-43 6.3.4 Public Facilities ................................................................................... V-43 6.4 Public Participation ........................................................................................... V-44 V - ii 6.4.1 Consultation Meeting Held .................................................................. V-44 6.4.2 Results of 1st Consultation Meeting..................................................... V-44 6.4.3 Results of 2nd Consultation Meeting ..................................................
Recommended publications
  • Cagayan Riverine Zone Development Framework Plan 2005—2030
    Cagayan Riverine Zone Development Framework Plan 2005—2030 Regional Development Council 02 Tuguegarao City Message The adoption of the Cagayan Riverine Zone Development Framework Plan (CRZDFP) 2005-2030, is a step closer to our desire to harmonize and sustainably maximize the multiple uses of the Cagayan River as identified in the Regional Physical Framework Plan (RPFP) 2005-2030. A greater challenge is the implementation of the document which requires a deeper commitment in the preservation of the integrity of our environment while allowing the development of the River and its environs. The formulation of the document involved the wide participation of concerned agencies and with extensive consultation the local government units and the civil society, prior to its adoption and approval by the Regional Development Council. The inputs and proposals from the consultations have enriched this document as our convergence framework for the sustainable development of the Cagayan Riverine Zone. The document will provide the policy framework to synchronize efforts in addressing issues and problems to accelerate the sustainable development in the Riverine Zone and realize its full development potential. The Plan should also provide the overall direction for programs and projects in the Development Plans of the Provinces, Cities and Municipalities in the region. Let us therefore, purposively use this Plan to guide the utilization and management of water and land resources along the Cagayan River. I appreciate the importance of crafting a good plan and give higher degree of credence to ensuring its successful implementation. This is the greatest challenge for the Local Government Units and to other stakeholders of the Cagayan River’s development.
    [Show full text]
  • Cepf Final Project Completion Report
    CEPF FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT I. BASIC DATA Organization Legal Name: Cagayan Valley Partners in People Development Project Title (as stated in the grant agreement): Design and Management of the Northeastern Cagayan Conservation Corridor Implementation Partners for this Project: Project Dates (as stated in the grant agreement): December 1, 2004 – June 30, 2007 Date of Report (month/year): August 2007 II. OPENING REMARKS Provide any opening remarks that may assist in the review of this report. Civil society -non-government organizations and people’s organizations, together with the academe and the church- have long been in the forefront of environmental protection in the Cagayan Valley region since the 1990s. They were and still are very active in the multi-sectoral forest protection committee and community-based forest resource management (CBFM) activities. A shift towards a conservation orientation came as a natural consequence of the Rio Summit and in view of the observation that biodiversity conservation was a neglected component of CBFM. Aside from this, there began to be implemented in region 02 biodiversity conservation projects under the CPPAP- GEF, Dutch assisted conservation and development project all in Isabela and the German assisted CBFM and Conservation project in the province of Quirino. Alongside with this was the push for the corridor approach. The CEPF assisted project is a conservation initiative that has come just at the right time when there was an upswing of interest in Cagayan in biodiversity conservation and environment protection. It came as a conservation felt need for the province of Cagayan in view of the successful pro-active actions in the neighboring province of Isabela which led to the establishment of the Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate-Responsive Integrated Master Plan for Cagayan River Basin
    Climate-Responsive Integrated Master Plan for Cagayan River Basin VOLUME I - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Submitted by College of Forestry and Natural Resources University of the Philippines Los Baños Funded by River Basin Control Office Department of Environment and Natural Resources CLIMATE-RESPONSIVE INTEGRATED RIVER BASIN MASTER PLAN FOR THE i CAGAYAN RIVER BASIN Table of Contents 1 Rationale .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Objectives of the Study .............................................................................................................................. 1 3 Scope .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 4 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. 2 5 Assessment Reports ................................................................................................................................... 3 5.1 Geophysical Profile ........................................................................................................................... 3 5.2 Bioecological Profile ......................................................................................................................... 6 5.3 Demographic Characteristics ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Assessment of Major River Basins in the Philippines
    International Journal of GEOMATE, Dec., 2019 Vol.17, Issue 64, pp. 201- 208 ISSN: 2186-2982 (P), 2186-2990 (O), Japan, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21660/2019.64.17155 Geotechnique, Construction Materials and Environment FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT OF MAJOR RIVER BASINS IN THE PHILIPPINES Christian Dominick Q. Alfonso1, Marloe B. Sundo*2, Richelle G. Zafra2, Perlie P. Velasco2, Jedidiah Joel C. Aguirre2 and Marish S. Madlangbayan2 1University of the Philippines Los Baños Foundation, Inc., Philippines; 2University of the Philippines Los Baños, Philippines *Corresponding Author, Received: 00 Oct. 2019, Revised: 00 Nov. 2019, Accepted: 00 Dec. 2019 ABSTRACT: Disaster risk management is vital in strengthening the resilience to and reduction of losses brought by natural disasters. In Philippines where typhoons frequently occur, flood risk maps are essential for the protection of communities and ecosystems in watersheds. This study created flood inundation maps with climate change considerations under 2020 A1B1 and 2050 A1B1 scenarios for four major river basins in the Philippines: the Agno, Cagayan, Mindanao, and Buayan-Malungon River Basins. From these maps, the most vulnerable areas for each basin are identified using GIS mapping software. Sixteen inundation risk maps were generated, four for each river basin, in terms of built-up areas, roads, bridges, and dams. Results showed that the northern part of Cagayan River Basin and the central parts of the Agno and Mindanao River Basins are the most flood-prone areas, while the Buayan-Malungon River Basin will have no significant inundation problems. Suitable adaptation and mitigation options were provided for each river basin. Keywords: Disaster risk reduction, Climate change adaption, Inundation, Risk Mapping 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Storm
    PHILIPPINES - Tropical Storm "Ondoy", Typhoon "Pepeng and Santi" - Affected Regions (as of 11 November 2009, SitRep 47 and 08 November 2009, NDCC SitRep 16) 120°E 121°E 122°E 123°E 124°E 125°E 126°E Typhoon "Santi" (landfall: October 31, 2009) Legend affected over 657,751 people across 1,148 barangays Regional Boundary in 22 cities and 126 municipalities of 13 provinces in ´ Provincial Boundary Regions III, IVA, IVB, V and NCR. Around 47, 909 RIZAL people were pre-emptively evacuated across 152 QUEZON "Ondoy, Pepeng & Santi" ILOCOS NORTE evacuation centres. "Ondoy & Pepeng" "Ondoy & Santi" APAYAO Typhoon "Pepeng" (landfall: October 3, 2009) affected over 4,478,284 people across 5,486 18°N "Pepeng & Santi" 18°N CAGAYAN barangays in 36 cities and 364 municipalities of 27 Tropical Storm "Ondoy" provinces in Regions I to VI, CAR and NCR. Around Typhoon "Pepeng" Region II 14,892 people are still inside 54 evacuation centres. Typhoon "Santi" ABRA Tropical Storm "Ondoy" (landfall: September 26, 2009) affected over 4,929,382 people across KALINGA Region I 1,987 barangays in 16 cities and 172 municipalities of 26 provinces in Regions I to VI, IX, X11, ARMM, CAR Map Doc Name: ILOCOS SUR and NCR. Around 72,305 people are still inside 252 MOUNTAIN PROVINCE evacuation centers. MAO93_PHL-Combined-Ondoy&Pepeng&Santi -AftAreas-11NOv2009-A4-V01 17°N 17°N Source: National Disaster Coordinating Council (NDCC), Philippines CAVITE Laguna de Bay Glide No.: TC-2009-000205-PHL CAR TC-2009-000214-PHL TC-2009-000230-PHL ISABELA Creation Date: 11 November 2009 LA UNION Projection/Datum: UTM/Luzon Datum BENGUET Web Resources: http://www.un.org.ph/response/ NUEVA VIZCAYA QUIRINO LAGUNA Best printed at A4 paper size PHILIPPINE SEA PANGASINAN A 16°N Data sources: 16°N BATANGAS AURORA NSCB - (www.nscb.gov.ph).
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Nueva Vizcaya Agricultural Terminal, Philippines
    Journal of Economics, Management & Agricultural Development Vol. 4, No. 2 57 Organizational Transformation of a Public-Private Partnership: The Case of the Nueva Vizcaya Agricultural Terminal, Philippines 1 2 3 Nimfa Beatris D. Montes , Agnes C. Rola , Isabelita M. Pabuayon , Dinah Pura T. Depositario4, and Vella A. Atienza5 Abstract The Nueva Vizcaya Agricultural Terminal (NVAT), Philippines is a mixed capital public-private joint venture established in Nueva Vizcaya in 2004 to address problems such as lack of markets and keen market competition. This study aims to describe NVAT’s organizational transformation, determine key factors that drove its transformation, and assess its current performance. The research made use of key informant interviews (KIIs), focused group discussions (FGDs), direct observations, and secondary data from records and manuals. Results show that transformation was achieved through crucial changes in governance, structure, core processes, culture, and strategies. The key drivers of transformation were the growing demand for fresh fruits and vegetables, dedicated leadership, and collective goal for good governance, among others. Through a farmers’ empowerment strategy and improved trading activities, operations were improved significantly. There were concrete gains in terms of relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, profitability, diversity, and sustainability. An entrepreneurial culture which promotes creativity and innovation should, however, be fostered in the organization. It was also recommended that NVAT should
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnomycological Survey of the Kalanguya Indigenous Community in Caranglan, Nueva Ecija, Philippines
    Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology 6 (2): 61–66(2016) ISSN 2229-2225 www.creamjournal.org Article CREAM Copyright © 2016 Online Edition Doi 10.5943/cream/6/2/1 Ethnomycological survey of the Kalanguya indigenous community in Caranglan, Nueva Ecija, Philippines De Leon AM1,2, Kalaw SP1,2, Dulay RM1,2, Undan JR1,2, Alfonzo DO2, Undan JQ2 and Reyes RG1,2 1 Department of Biological Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Central Luzon State University, Science City of Muñoz, Nueva Ecija, 3119, Philippines 2 Tuklas Lunas Center, College of Arts and Sciences, Central Luzon State University, Science City of Muñoz, Nueva Ecija, 3119, Philippines De Leon AM, Kalaw SP, Dulay RM, Undan JR, Alfonzo DO, Undan JQ, Reyes RG 2016 – Ethnomycological survey of the Kalanguya indigenous community in Caranglan, Nueva Ecija, Philippines. Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology 6(1), 61–66, Doi 10.5943/cream/6/2/1 Abstract We documented the indigenous beliefs and utilization of macrofungi by the Kalanguya tribe. To perform the ethnomycological survey of macrofungi utilized by the Kalanguya indigenous community in Sitio Binbin, Brgy. General Luna, Carranglan, Nueva Ecija, the community members and their chieftain were asked to answer survey questionnaires pertaining to their beliefs and knowledge on mushroom utilization, collection and cultivation. Then, collection of the utilized macrofungi were performed during the rainy season. Results showed that most of indigenous people knew about mushrooms, which they locally called as bagel and buo, and utilized for food. There were 36 species claimed by the community as edible, however, only 10 species were obtained during the collection.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philippines Illustrated
    The Philippines Illustrated A Visitors Guide & Fact Book By Graham Winter of www.philippineholiday.com Fig.1 & Fig 2. Apulit Island Beach, Palawan All photographs were taken by & are the property of the Author Images of Flower Island, Kubo Sa Dagat, Pandan Island & Fantasy Place supplied courtesy of the owners. CHAPTERS 1) History of The Philippines 2) Fast Facts: Politics & Political Parties Economy Trade & Business General Facts Tourist Information Social Statistics Population & People 3) Guide to the Regions 4) Cities Guide 5) Destinations Guide 6) Guide to The Best Tours 7) Hotels, accommodation & where to stay 8) Philippines Scuba Diving & Snorkelling. PADI Diving Courses 9) Art & Artists, Cultural Life & Museums 10) What to See, What to Do, Festival Calendar Shopping 11) Bars & Restaurants Guide. Filipino Cuisine Guide 12) Getting there & getting around 13) Guide to Girls 14) Scams, Cons & Rip-Offs 15) How to avoid petty crime 16) How to stay healthy. How to stay sane 17) Do’s & Don’ts 18) How to Get a Free Holiday 19) Essential items to bring with you. Advice to British Passport Holders 20) Volcanoes, Earthquakes, Disasters & The Dona Paz Incident 21) Residency, Retirement, Working & Doing Business, Property 22) Terrorism & Crime 23) Links 24) English-Tagalog, Language Guide. Native Languages & #s of speakers 25) Final Thoughts Appendices Listings: a) Govt.Departments. Who runs the country? b) 1630 hotels in the Philippines c) Universities d) Radio Stations e) Bus Companies f) Information on the Philippines Travel Tax g) Ferries information and schedules. Chapter 1) History of The Philippines The inhabitants are thought to have migrated to the Philippines from Borneo, Sumatra & Malaya 30,000 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf | 308.16 Kb
    2. Damaged Infrastructure and Agriculture (Tab D) Total Estimated Cost of Damages PhP 411,239,802 Infrastructure PhP 29,213,821.00 Roads & Bridges 24,800,000.00 Transmission Lines 4,413,821.00 Agriculture 382,025,981.00 Crops 61,403,111.00 HVCC 5,060,950.00 Fisheries 313,871,920.00 Facilities 1,690,000.00 No report of damage on school buildings and health facilities as of this time. D. Emergency Incidents Monitored 1. Region II a) On or about 10:00 AM, 08 May 2009, one (1) ferry boat owned by Brgy Captain Nicanor Taguba of Gagabutan, Rizal, bound to Cambabangan, Rizal, Cagayan, to attend patronal fiesta with twelve (12) passengers on board, capsized while crossing the Matalad River. Nine (9) passengers survived while three (3) are still missing identified as Carmen Acasio Anguluan (48 yrs /old), Vladimir Acasio Anguluan (7 yrs /old) and Mac Dave Talay Calibuso (5 yrs/old), all from Gagabutan East Rizal, Cagayan. The 501st Infantry Division (ID) headed by Col. Remegio de Vera, PNP personnel and some volunteers from Rizal, Cagayan conducted search and rescue operations. b) In Nueva Vizcaya, 31 barangays were flooded: Solano (16), Bagabag (5), Bayombong (4), Bambang (4), in Dupax del Norte (1) and in Dupax del Sur (1). c) Barangays San Pedro and Manglad in Maddela, Quirino were isolated due to flooding. e) The low-lying areas of Brgys Mabini and Batal in Santiago City, 2 barangays in Dupax del Norte and 4 barangays in Bambang were rendered underwater with 20 families evacuated at Bgy Mabasa Elementary School.
    [Show full text]
  • The Avocado in the Philippines
    California Avocado Association 1936 Yearbook 21: 103-108 The Avocado in the Philippines Gumbay Piang The avocado was introduced in the Philippines by the Spaniards, but the only tree which lived to be seen after the termination of the Spanish regime was a large tree growing on a plaza in the Walled City, Manila. This tree was destroyed in 1905 by a typhoon. Nobody knows when the avocado was first introduced in the Islands. Different authorities give different dates. Dr. Elmer D. Merrill, former director of the Philippine Bureau of Science, stated that the avocado was introduced by the Spaniards before 1700; the late Peter J. Wester, world-renowned hosticulturist of the then Bureau of Agriculture (now the Bureau of Plant Industry), said that the introduction was at least twenty-five years before the American occupation of the Archipelago; while G. E. Nesom, then director of the Bureau of Agriculture, mentioned that a Spanish priest from Acapulco, Mexico, brought the avocado in 1890. The first successful introductions were made in 1903 by W. S. Lyon, then horticulturist of the Bureau of Agriculture. Hawaii, Costa Rica, and the United States were the sources of these early introductions. Later on thousands of seeds were imported by the Bureau of Agriculture from Hawaii. Budwoods were also imported as early as 1912, mainly from Florida. BUDWOOD FROM POPENOE In 1912 Dr. Wilson Popenoe, to whom the world is greatly indebted for his very fruitful long1 years of avocado explorations, sent budwoods of the Dickinson and Cummins avocados. Budwoods of other named and unnamed varieties were sent from Florida in 1913 by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Region Name of Laboratory Ii 4J Clinical & Diagnostic
    REGION NAME OF LABORATORY II 4J CLINICAL & DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY II A.G.PADRE MD. FAMILY HEALTHCARE CLINIC AND DIAGNOSTIC CENTER II A.M. YUMENA GENERAL HOSPITAL INC. II ADCARE DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY II ADVENTIST HOSPITAL - SANTIAGO CITY, INC. II AGUAS MATERNITY AND GENERAL HOSPITAL II ALCALA MUNICIPAL HOSPITAL II ALFONSO PONCE ENRILE MEMORIAL DISTRICT HOSPITAL II AMAZING GRACE MEDICAL & DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES II APARRI PROVINCIAL HOSPITAL II APAYAO CAGAYAN MEDICAL CENTER, INC. II ASANIAS POLYCLINIC II BALLESTEROS DISTRICT HOSPITAL II BATANES GENERAL HOSPITAL II BEST DIAGNOSTIC CORPORATION II CABATUAN FAMILY HOSPITAL, INC. II CAGAYAN HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC CENTER INC. II CAGAYAN VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER II CALAYAN INFIRMARY II CALLANG GENERAL HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, INC. II CAMP MELCHOR F. DELA CRUZ STATION HOSPITAL II CARAG MEDICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC II CARITAS HEALTH SHIELD, INC. - TUGUEGARAO II CARITAS HEALTH SHIELD, INC.-SANTIAGO BRANCH II CAUAYAN DISTRICT HOSPITAL II CAUAYAN FAMILY HOSPITAL SATELLITE CLINIC AND LABORATORY II CAUAYAN MEDICAL SPECIALISTS HOSPITAL II CHARLES W. SELBY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC. II CITY DIAGNOSTIC AND LABORATORY II CITY HEALTH OFFICE LABORATORY II CLI DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY II CLINICA BUCAG MULTISPECIALTY CLINIC II CORADO MEDICAL CLINIC AND HOSPITAL II DE VERA MEDICAL CENTER, INC. II DEMANO'S MEDICAL AND PEDIATRIC CLINIC II DIADI EMERGENCY HOSPITAL REGION NAME OF LABORATORY II DIAGNOSTIKA CLINICAL LABORATORY II DIFFUN DISTRICT HOSPITAL II DIFFUN MUNICIPAL HEALTH OFFICE CLINICAL LABORATORY II DIVINE CARE DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY II DIVINE MERCY WELLNESS CENTER, INC. II DLB DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY II DR. DOMINGO S. DE LEON GENERAL HOSPITAL II DR. ESTER R. GARCIA MEDICAL CENTER, INC. II DR. RONALD P. GUZMAN MEDICAL CENTER, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feasibility Study of the Flood Control Project for the Lower Cagayan River in the Republic of the Philippines
    JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES THE FEASIBILITY STUDY OF THE FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT FOR THE LOWER CAGAYAN RIVER IN THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES FINAL REPORT VOLUME I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FEBRUARY 2002 NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. NIKKEN Consultants, Inc. SSS JR 02- 07 List of Volumes Volume I : Executive Summary Volume II : Main Report Volume III-1 : Supporting Report Annex I : Socio-economy Annex II : Topography Annex III : Geology Annex IV : Meteo-hydrology Annex V : Environment Annex VI : Flood Control Volume III-2 : Supporting Report Annex VII : Watershed Management Annex VIII : Land Use Annex IX : Cost Estimate Annex X : Project Evaluation Annex XI : Institution Annex XII : Transfer of Technology Volume III-3 : Supporting Report Drawings Volume IV : Data Book The cost estimate is based on the price level and exchange rate of June 2001. The exchange rate is: US$1.00 = PHP50.0 = ¥120.0 PREFACE In response to a request from the Government of the Republic of the Philippines, the Government of Japan decided to conduct the Feasibility Study of the Flood Control Project for the Lower Cagayan River in the Republic of the Philippines and entrusted the study to the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). JICA selected and dispatched a study team headed by Mr. Hideki SATO of NIPPON KOEI Co.,LTD. (consist of NIPPON KOEI Co.,LTD. and NIKKEN Consultants, Inc.) to the Philippines, six times between March 2000 and December 2001. In addition, JICA set up an advisory committee headed by Mr. Hidetomi Oi, Senior Advisor of JICA between March 2000 and February 2002, which examined the study from technical points of view.
    [Show full text]