DOCSLIB.ORG

SSF-Application-Englands-Creative-Coast.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SSF-Application-Englands-Creative-Coast.Pdf Sector Support Fund (SSF) Sector Support Fund (SSF) Application Template 1. Project Title England’s Creative Coast (previously known as Culture Coasting) 2. Project Location Lead contact location: Turner Contemporary, Rendezvous, Margate CT9 1HG. The project will be delivered across locations in Essex, South Essex, East Sussex, Kent and Medway, and West Sussex. The SELEP Creative Economy Network (SECEN) is the Project Management Group, supported by Kent County Council as the recipient of funds. 3. Lead point of contact for Project Name Victoria Pomery Organisation Turner Contemporary Job Title Director Telephone 01832 233002 Email [email protected] 4. Lead contact in County Council/ Unitary Authority (if different from above) Name Steve Grimshaw Organisation Kent County Council Job Title Strategic Programme Manager Telephone 03000 417084 Email [email protected] 5. Description of Project (No more than 300 words) This narrative should include evidence of impact in at least three of the four SELEP Federated areas and links to sector based working groups England’s Creative Coast is SECEN’s flagship tourism project to create an innovative new immersive visitor experience driven by world class art, which aims to build the volume and value of visitors to the federated area. The project is Pan-LEP and the partnership includes Turner Contemporary (Margate), Visit Kent, East Sussex County Council, Kent County Council, Southend Borough Council, Essex County Council, Visit Essex, Southeastern, Metal (Southend) and Estuary Festival, Whitstable Biennale, Creative Foundation (Folkestone), Towner Art Gallery (Eastbourne), De La Warr Pavilion (Bexhill on Sea), Jerwood Gallery (Hastings) and The Historic Dockyard Chatham, as well as. Pallant House Gallery, Cass Sculpture Foundation and Arundel Castle in West Sussex who are promotional partners. It will help deliver the growth potential identified within the SELEP Creative Economy Prospectus and that of the newly emerging Tourism Working Group. Predicted visitor growth from this project is 3% in East Sussex, Kent and Essex by 2020, enabling 4.700 direct and indirect jobs across the region. Led by Turner Contemporary and Visit Kent, investment has already been secured from Arts Council England’s Cultural Destinations programme (£500k) and 1 Sector Support Fund (SSF) VisitEngland’s Discover England Fund (£350k) as well as many of the local authorities. England’s Creative Coast is designed to respond to current visitor behaviour trends, tap into new markets and will create a step change for the galleries and the tourism sector across the area. It addresses the challenges of the South East as a destination with no one major urban centre and builds practical and scalable initiatives and interconnections across the South East and beyond. The project will continue to stimulate further innovation and growth beyond the lifetime of this project by delivering: World class art featuring a minimum of 7 art commissions creating a connected South East coast trail; Two itinerary-planning online platforms (one B2B, one B2C) which aim to increase income opportunities for tourism businesses across the South East; A multifaceted international and national tourism marketing campaign; Local engagement programmes capturing a “sense of place” delivered by the cultural partners; Artists’ “bnb” audit, training and toolkit; Increased opportunity for spend of new visitors attracted to the Turner Prize (Margate 2019), Folkestone Triennial 2020, Estuary Festival 2020, Whitstable Biennale 2020, and the new National Coast Path; Promotion of sustainable travel and accessibility to visitors, encouraging use of different modes of transport and eco-friendly options as part of their trip, such as bicycle hire and train travel brokered through sponsorship such as with Southeastern trains and working with cycle tour operators such as The Carter Company and is open to any business providing cycle hire. Accessibility will be key to the development of the art commissions – ensuring that everyone is able to access the works in some way (through level access or through film); An iterative learning programme, knowledge sharing events, training and development; Research (quantitative and qualitative) – There will be an assessment and report on the Volume and Value of tourism activities across the South East Local Enterprise Partnership (SELEP) region and West Sussex (this is the first time this baseline data has been collated in one report), as well as a report on current perceptions of the SELEP region with collation of data from existing perception research and some primary research targeted at French and Dutch markets. Furthermore, the cultural partners will undertake research into tourists visiting their venues through a shared survey; Scalable options for Associate Partners to utilise such as the new geocaching activity. 6. Project links to SELEP Strategic Economic Plan Please identify which objectives within the current SEP that this project will assist in delivering England’s Creative Coast drives growth, innovation and prosperity by linking the federal areas through an innovative and collaborative project that taps into one of the fastest growing sectors – the creative industries. The project encourages business growth through tourism and culture and exposes the South East to the international market place. It will particularly target the French and Dutch Markets. Building on economic strengths: The creative industries are worth more than £87.4bn in GVA to the UK and the creative economy employs one in every 11 working people (approx. 24% of the workforce). Tourism generates £106 billion a year to the British economy, employing over 2m people and supporting thousands of businesses. The current value of tourism to the SELEP area is as follows: 2 Sector Support Fund (SSF) Indicator Kent and East West Essex (per Medway Sussex Sussex Totals (per capita) (per (per (per capita) capita) capita) capita) Total number of trips – including overnight 50.3m 60.6m 27.6m 19.3m 157.9m stays and day trips Total tourism value £3.026bn £3.610bn £2.073bn £1.385bn £10.09bn Actual jobs 59,024 71,920 45,726 29,685 206,355 Data collated from Cambridge Economic Impact 2015 reports for Kent, Essex, East Sussex and West Sussex England’s Creative Coast will lead a step-change in the visitor economy. The project is rooted in partnership working, connecting people, businesses and places, and building a new offer that will create resilience and growth. It aims to contribute to a 3% growth in the visitor economy across the SELEP area. Building skills, sharing knowledge: British tourism is expected to grow to £257 billion by 2025. This project will enable knowledge exchange across the creative industries and tourism sectors on a region-wide level, delivering growth in information and skills. This will stimulate cross-sectorial working between partners and tourism businesses and enable the two sectors to work together to maximise the opportunities to increase visitors to the SELEP region. Investment of £150,000 from SELEP will lever in £1.02m match. 7. Total value (£s) of SSF sought (net of VAT) The total value of Sector Support Funding sought will be £150,000. The areas of work the SSF funding is contributing towards are: Domestic marketing campaign – 35% (£52,500) Art Commissions by international artists - 30% (£45,000) Local Engagement (community growth and skills development) - 25% (£37,500) Research – 5% (£7,500) Project management – 5% (£7,500) 8. Total value (£s) of project (net of VAT) The total value of the project will be £1,179,000. 9. Total value (£) of match funding (net of VAT) The value of match funding will be at least £1,029,000. 3 Sector Support Fund (SSF) 10. Funding breakdown (£s) Source 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 20202/21 Total SSF £100,000 £50,000 £150,000 Other sources of funding (please list below, add additional rows if necessary) Arts Council England £90,000 £90,000 £180,000 £140,000 £500,000 Cultural Destinations Visit England – Discover England £100,000 £250,000 - - £350,000 Fund Kent County Council £14,000 £10,000 £10,000 - £34,000 East Sussex County £20,000 - £15,000 £15,000 £50,000 Council Essex County £10,000 £10,000 - - £20,000 Council Southend-on-Sea £10,000 - - - £10,000 Borough Council Chatham Historic - £5,000 £5,000 £5,000 £15,000 Dockyard Southeastern £5,000 £10,000 - - £15,000 Visit Kent £5,000 £10,000 - - £15,000 Visit Kent – further - £15,000 - - £15,000 match funding Visit Essex - £5,000 - - £5,000 Total Project Cost £254,000 £405,000 £310,000 £210,000 £1,179,000 11. Details of match funding Insert details of match funding, including who is providing match, at what value, on what terms and what assurances are there that the match will be provided Arts Council England £500,000 – grant agreement signed January 2018 Visit England Discover England Fund £350,000 – grant agreement signed February 2018 Kent County Council £34,000 – funding agreed East Sussex County Council £50,000 – funder agreement signed April 2018 Essex County Council £20,000 – funder agreement signed April 2018 Southend Borough Council £10,000 – funder agreement signed April 2018 Historic Dockyard Chatham £15,000 – funding agreed Southeastern £15,000 – sponsorship agreed for Year 1 and 2 Visit Kent – £15,000 co-financing agreed Visit Kent (from Experience West Sussex) - £15,000 match funding Visit Essex – £5,000 funding agreed 12. Expected project start and completion dates Start date: 6 November 2017 4 Sector
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ant-Like Flower Beetles (Coleoptera: Anthicidae) of the Uk, Ireland and Channel Isles
    BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 23: 2010 99 ANT-LIKE FLOWER BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: ANTHICIDAE) OF THE UK, IRELAND AND CHANNEL ISLES DMITRY TELNOV Stopinu novads, Darza iela 10, LV-2130, Dzidrinas, Latvia; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The Anthicidae or ant-like flower beetles of the UK, Ireland and Channel Isles are reviewed. A species list, identification key, short diagnoses and illustrations of all taxa are given. Brief information on known ecological preferences of species is given. Key words: identification, distribution, key, United Kingdom, Ireland, fauna, ecology. INTRODUCTION Anthicidae are a cosmopolitan family of small to medium-sized, fast-moving beetles of the superfamily Tenebrionoidea. Anthicidae are represented in the World fauna by approximately 100 genera, and about 3500 species (Chandler, 2010). Only a few species are known from the fossil record. The last revision of the British Anthicidae was published by F. D. Buck (1954) in the well-known series Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects. Since then, there have been numerous nomenclatural changes within Anthicidae, and some additional species (introduced) have been recorded from the UK, making Buck’s key out of date. During 2004 and 2005 a total of 3356 specimens of Anthicidae from the UK and Ireland were examined by the author, mainly from the collections of The Natural History Museum (London), Oxford University Museum of Natural History and National Museum of Ireland. Additional data for more than 2100 specimens were received from other British museums and private collections between 2005 and 2007. A new key and short diagnoses for the genera are presented, as well as data on habitats and general distribution of species.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Compact City: a London Case Study – Spatial Impacts, Social Polarisation, Sustainable 1 Development and Social Justice
    University of Westminster Duncan Bowie January 2017 Reflections, Issue 19 BEYOND THE COMPACT CITY: A LONDON CASE STUDY – SPATIAL IMPACTS, SOCIAL POLARISATION, SUSTAINABLE 1 DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL JUSTICE Duncan Bowie Senior Lecturer, Department of Planning and Transport, University of Westminster [email protected] Abstract: Many urbanists argue that the compact city approach to development of megacities is preferable to urban growth based on spatial expansion at low densities, which is generally given the negative description of ‘urban sprawl’. The argument is often pursued on economic grounds, supported by theories of agglomeration economics, and on environmental grounds, based on assumptions as to efficient land use, countryside preservation and reductions in transport costs, congestion and emissions. Using London as a case study, this paper critiques the continuing focus on higher density and hyper-density residential development in the city, and argues that development options beyond its core should be given more consideration. It critiques the compact city assumptions incorporated in strategic planning in London from the first London Plan of 2004, and examines how the both the plan and its implementation have failed to deliver the housing needed by Londoners and has led to the displacement of lower income households and an increase in spatial social polarisation. It reviews the alternative development options and argues that the social implications of alternative forms of growth and the role of planning in delivering spatial social justice need to be given much fuller consideration, in both planning policy and the delivery of development, if growth is to be sustainable in social terms and further spatial polarisation is to be avoided.
    [Show full text]
  • 694 STATISTICAL YEAR-BOOK the Following Are the Lists of The
    694 STATISTICAL YEAR-BOOK The following are the lists of the members of the several Provincial Legislatures :— PROVINCE OF ONTARIO. LEGJSLATIVE ASSEMBLY, 1903. SPEAKER—Hox. WILLIAM A. CHARLTON. CLEKK—CHAS. CLARKE. Constituencies. Representatives. Constituencies, Representatives. Addington Reid, James Middlesex, West. Ross, Hon. Geo. W. Algoma Smyth, W. R. Monck Harconrt, Hon. R. Brant, North Burt, Daniel Muskoka Vacant. Brant, South Preston, Thomas H. Nipissing, West.. Michaud, Joseph Brockville Graham, Geo. P. Ni pissing, East.. James, M. Bruce, Centre.... Clark, Hugh Norfolk, North .. Little, Archibald Bruce, North Bowman, Chas. M. Norfolk, South. Charlton, Hon. W. A. Bruce, South Truax, R. A. NorthumbTnd,E. Wilkmghby, William A. Cardwell Little, E. A. Northumb'l'nd, W Clarke, Samuel Carleton Kidd, G. N. Ontario, North .. Hoyle, W. H. Dufferin Barr, John Ontario, South... Dryden, Hon. J. Dundas Whitney, J. P. f Murphy, Dennis Durham, East.... Preston, Josiah Ottawa. Powell, C. B. Durham, West... Rickard, William Oxford, North... Pattullo, Andrew Elgin, East Brower, C. A. Oxford, South.... Sutherland, D. Elgin, West Macdiarmid, Finlay G. Parry Sound Carr, Milton Essex, North Reaunie, Joseph C. Peel Smith, J. Essex, South Auld. John Allan Perth, North .... Brown, John. Fort William and Perth, South Stock, Valentine Lake of the Woods Cameron, D. C. Peterborough, E. Anderson, William. Frontenac Gallagher, John S. Peterborough, W. Stratton,Hon. J. R. Glengarry McLeod, Wm. D. Port Arthnr and Grenville Joynt, R. L. Rainy River ... Conmee, James Grey, Centre Lucas, J. B. Prescott Evanturel, Hon. F. E. A. Grey, North Boyd, G. M. Prince Edward... Currie, Morley Grey. South Jamieson, D. Renfrew, North.. Vacant.
    [Show full text]
  • Congratulations
    Brant North Women's Institute set up a recycling display at the Lynden Park Mall in Brantford. A lot of interest was indicated in the material the women had available. Recently appointed Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food Deputy Minister Rita Burak, left, visited the Federated Women's Institutes of Ontario Board meeting in August. She is pictured here with FWIO President Margaret Munro, centre, and FWIO President Elect Peggy Knapp. Ms. Burak came to OMAF finm the Ministry of Housing. Prior to that she was Assistant Deputy Minister with OMAF. Congratulations . Congratulations to the following groups on the recent celebration of anniversaries . Burford WI, Brant South . 90 Branchton WI, Waterloo South . 85 Kintore WI, Oxford North . .85 Moorefield WI, Wellington North . .85 Wellington Centre WI . 85 Cavan WI, Durham East . .75 Dungannon WI, Huron West . 75 Jarratt-Cre igton WI, Simcoe North . .75 Maple Valley WI, Simcoe West . .75 Rushview WI, Dufferin North . .75 Gleneden WI, Grey South . 70 Princeton-Woodbury WI , Brant South . .70 Fairfield WI, Leeds East . 65 Pittsburgh WI, Fro ntenac . .. 65 Derry West WI, Peel South . 60 Summerville WI, Oxford South . .60 Tyendinaga East WI . 60 South Line Brant WI, Bruce East . .55 Bolsover WI, Victoria West . 40 Palmyra WI, Kent East . 40 Since 1985, the Tweedsmuir Committee of the Magnetawan Women's Institute has Lookout Bay WI, Prescott . .35 collected photos and histories on all the houses and buildings in the village. This Gillies Hill WI, Bruce East . .30 summer, the work culminated in a community display of the information . Pictured North Emily WI, Victo ria West .
    [Show full text]
  • Legislators and Legislatures of Ontario : a Reference Guide
    Msktor^s Ijegisl/itivcUkmy isktors a ofOntum a tvfenmceguide n/oCume 4/1984-1991 dt m m. Ontario Le^sktiveL3mt Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Forman, Debra, 1956- Legislators and legislatures of Ontario 4. 1984-1991. Contents: v. 1. 1792-1866. - v. 2. 1867-1929. ~ v. 3. 1930-1984. - v. - 0-7743- ISBN 0-7743-9021-2 (set). - 0-7743-9022-0 (v. 1). - 0-7743-9023-9 (v. 2). 9024-7 (v. 3). - 0-7729-9328-9 (v. 4). 3. 1. Ontario. Legislative Assembly-History. 2. Ontario-Politics and government. Legislators-Ontario-History. I. Ontario. Legislative Library. II. Title. JL273.F6 1984 328.713'09 84-093008-9 1 1 Contents Foreword v Introduction vii Errata viii General Elections 1984-1991 1 Presidentsof the Executive Council 1984-1991 2 Alphabetical Index of Members 1792- 1991 3-27 Executive CouncUs of Ontario 1 984- 1 99 29-5 Death Notices Former Ontario MPPs 1984-1991 53-54 32nd Legislature 55-87 33rd Legislature 88-109 34th Legislature 110-181 35th Legislature 182-201 ® IV Foreword Approximately 5,200 men and women have served as Members of the House of Assembly of the Province of Upper Canada (1792-1841), as Members from Canada West in the Legislative Assembly of the united Province of Canada (1841-1867), and as Members of the legislative Assembly of the Province of Ontario (1867-1991). In the past, identification or verification of a particular Member, Legislature or Electoral District has proved to be a tedious and time-consuming task for those researching Ontario's political history because the information is scattered in a great many sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentish Dialect
    A Dictionary of the KENTISH DIALECT © 2008 KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY 'A Dictionary of the Kentish Dialect and Provincialisms: in use in the county of Kent' by W.D.Parish and W.F.Shaw (Lewes: Farncombe,1888) 'The Dialect of Kent: being the fruits of many rambles' by F. W. T. Sanders (Private limited edition, 1950). Every attempt was made to contact the author to request permission to incorporate his work without success. His copyright is hereby acknowledged. 'A Dictionary of Kentish Dialect and Provincialisms' : in use in the county of Kent by W.D.Parish and W.F.Shaw (Lewes: Farncombe,1888) Annotated copy by L. R. Allen Grove and others (1977) 'The Dialect of Kent in the 14th Century by Richard Morris' (Reprinted from Archaeologia Cantiana Vol VI, 1863) With thanks to the Centre for Kentish Studies, County Hall, Maidstone, Kent Database by Camilla Harley Layout and design © 2008 Kent Archaeological Society '0D RABBIT IT od rab-it it interj. A profane expression, meaning, "May God subvert it." From French 'rabattre'. A Dictionary of the Kentish Dialect and Provincialisms (1888)Page 11 AAZES n.pl. Hawthorn berries - S B Fletcher, 1940-50's; Boys from Snodland, L.R A.G. 1949. (see also Haazes, Harves, Haulms and Figs) Notes on 'A Dictionary of Kentish Dialect & Provincialisms' (c1977)Page 1 ABED ubed adv. In bed. "You have not been abed, then?" Othello Act 1 Sc 3 A Dictionary of the Kentish Dialect and Provincialisms (1888)Page 1 ABIDE ubie-d vb. To bear; to endure; to tolerate; to put-up-with.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Moth Report
    The Rare Moths of Rye Harbour Rye Harbour Flora and Fauna Volume 5 By Chris Bentley Published by Rye Harbour Nature Reserve 2 Watch Cottages Winchelsea East Sussex TN36 4LU www.wildRye.info November 2008 Map of Rye Harbour Area RYE HARBOUR FLORA & FAUNA Rare Moths The Rare Moths of Rye Harbour Rye Harbour Flora and Fauna Volume 5 By Chris Bentley Contents page Rye Harbour Nature Reserve 1 Visiting 2 Introduction 3 The List of Moths 5 Photos of Moths 37 Image Credits 49 Index of Moths 51 Wildlife Recording 53 Rye Harbour Nature Reserve In 1965 East Sussex County Council published a report on the future development of the East Sussex Coast which included proposals to encourage the establishment of a Nature Reserve over the whole of the 728 hectares (c.1,800 acres) of the Rye Harbour Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). In 1970 the shingle beach, now owned by the Environment Agency, was declared a Local Nature Reserve (LNR) by the County Council, who also appointed a Management Committee to administer the LNR. This was the beginning of Rye Harbour Local Nature Reserve. Since then further land has been added by agreement with neighbouring landowners and the County Council and by purchase of land by the Sussex Wildlife Trust with the help of the Friends of Rye Harbour Nature Reserve. It is hoped that further areas of the SSSI will become part of the Nature Reserve and so this report covers the whole area. The present extent of Rye Harbour Nature Reserve, some 326ha, includes the seaward shingle ridges extending inland to, and including, the gravel pit known as Ternery Pool and the nearby excavation known as the Quarry (Beach Reserve), a large gravel pit (Castle Water), a large area of meadow land and shingle ridges around Camber Castle (Castle Farm) and a small area of saltmarsh fringing the western bank of the River Rother between Rye Harbour and the river mouth.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1 1 Introduction
    Watershed Characterization Report Thames Watershed & Region (Upper Thames River & Lower Thames Valley Source Protection Areas) Volume 1 1 Introduction 2 Watershed Description 2.1 Source Protection Region 2.2 Physical Description 2.3 Hydrology & Climate 2.4 Naturally Vegetated Areas 2.5 Aquatic Ecology 2.6 Human Characterization 2.7 Water Uses Volume 2 3 Water Quality 3.1 Selecting Indicator Parameters 3.2 Raw Water Characterization for Inland Surface Water 3.3 Groundwater Quality 3.4 Raw Water Characterization for Drinking Water Intakes 3.5 Data and Knowledge Gaps for Water Quality Volume 3 4 Water Quantity 4.1 Water Use 4.2 Data and Knowledge Gaps for Water Use 5 Description of Vulnerable Areas 5.1 Identification of Source Protection Areas 5.2 Groundwater: Aquifer Vulnerability, Wellhead Protection Areas & Potential Drinking Water Sources 5.3 Surface Water: Intake Protection Zones 6 Existing Drinking Water Threats Inventories 6.1 Threats to Water Quality 6.2 Known Water Quality Issues 6.3 Data and Knowledge Gaps for Existing Drinking Water Threats Inventories 7 Summary of Identified Issues and Concerns Appendices A: Data Gap Reporting B: List of Acronyms C: Significant Natural Areas and Wetlands (UTRCA) D: References Watershed Characterization Report – Thames Watershed & Region - Volume 1 i Thames Watershed & Region Maps Map 1: Thames-Sydenham & Region Source Protection Region Map 2: Major Subwatershed Delineations Map 3: Bedrock Topography Map 4: Bedrock Geology Map 5: Overburden Thickness Map 6: Surficial Geology Map 7: Physiography
    [Show full text]
  • Six Conservation Authorities Six Conservation Authorities FEFLOW Groundwater Model FEFLOW Groundwater Model FEFLOW Groundwater M
    Six Conservation Authorities FEFLOW Groundwater Model Conceptual Model Report December 2004 Prepared by: Waterloo Hydrogeologic, Inc. Prepared for: Upper Thames Conservation Authority Table of Contents 111 Introduction 444 1.1 Overview.............................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Objectives............................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Scope and Major Tasks.................................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Previous / Concurrent Studies and Other Data Sources........................................................................... 5 1.5 Mapping and Database Development........................................................................................................... 6 1.5.1 GIS Mapping............................................................................................................................................... 6 1.5.2 Relational Database of Water Well Records....................................................................................... 7 1.5.3 Permit to Take Water Database............................................................................................................. 8 1.5.4 Oil and Gas Well Records.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Compelling Case for Change
    THE COMPELLING CASE FOR CHANGE The new Kent and Medway Local Enterprise Partnership July 2015 1 2 This document sets out a compelling case to change the geography of the South East Local Enterprise Partnership. It proposes the establishment of a new Kent and Medway LEP – one which is highly relevant to business and which builds on a cohesive economic geography, a deep understanding of our economic challenges and opportunities and an excellent partnership between business and government. Our new Partnership will deliver faster and better for Kent and Medway and for the UK. This document sets out how we will build a new approach to delivering the skills, the infrastructure and the innovation for a highly productive economy – and how we will work together strategically and with strong governance across the county to deliver long term growth. The existing South East LEP slows down the delivery of our ambitions. We will be more focused and more effective through a Kent and Medway Local Enterprise Partnership. But we are committed to working together with our neighbours in Essex, East Sussex and London. We are working with our partners to ensure a smooth transition from the South East LEP to better arrangements. It’s time for change. We have a compelling case for a better future. We ask Government to back our proposals. 3 1. INTRODUCTION This document sets out the compelling case to change the geography of the South East Local Enterprise Partnership. It proposes the establishment of a new Kent and Medway LEP which is highly relevant to business and will be effective in delivering growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Smoke-Free Ontario Strategy Monitoring Report | Protection
    Smoke-Free Ontario Strategy Monitoring Report: Protection Smoke-Free Ontario Strategy Monitoring Report | Protection Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................... 2 List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Protection: Smoke-Free Ontario Strategy Components ............................................................................. 4 Protection Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................ 6 Ontario Tobacco Research Unit .............................................................................................................. 6 Program Training and Consultation Centre ............................................................................................ 6 Public Health Units and Tobacco Control Area Networks ...................................................................... 7 Smoking and Health Action Foundation ................................................................................................. 8 Youth Advocacy Training Institute .......................................................................................................... 8 Protection Interventions ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UK Biodiversity Action Plan Priority Moths
    A Summary of the New UK Biodiversity Action Plan Priority Moths Introduction The following species have been published as new UK BAP Priority Species (see the Species and Habitat Review 2007 on www.ukbap.org.uk ). The purpose of this document is to provide a brief overview of the status and ecology (where known), as well as identifying initial conservation priorities, although some actions are already underway for some of these species. 71 Stigmella zelleriella Ecology The larva mines the leaves of Creeping Willow on coastal sandhills during July and again in September – October. The mine is a gallery which follows the leaf margin before widening to a small blotch. It can be confused with that of S. salicis . Past Distribution Only known in the UK from Sandwich Bay, Kent and an unconfirmed record from Lindisfarne, Northumberland. Current Distribution Reported from Lindisfarne in 1997. May still occur at Sandwich Bay but confirmation is needed. Initial Conservation Priorities - determine status, size of population, area of available habitat and threats at Lindisfarne - establish current status at Sandwich Bay - if still present at Sandwich Bay, liase with land owner over management to increase foodplant resource - raise profile to encourage survey at suitable sites on east coast of England 133 Lampronia capitella Ecology The larvae feed on the seeds of currant and Wild Gooseberry. Tenanted fruits appear prematurely ripe. In the following spring it feeds in a bud, usually causing the death of the developing shoot. The adult flies in late May and June. It is found in gardens and also woodlands where the foodplants occur.
    [Show full text]