DOCSLIB.ORG

Cbms Between India and Pakistan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cbms Between India and Pakistan CBMs between India and Pakistan Declarations: • The Tashkent Declaration 1966 i • Joint Statement (23rd September 1998) of the Prime Ministers of India and Pakistan after a bilateral meeting on the side-lines of UNGA New Lahore Declaration (February 1999)ii • Lahore Declaration (February 1999)iii • Agra Summit (July 2001) iv Treaties/Agreement: Treaty- Utilisation of the waters of the Indus system of rivers • The Indus Waters Treaty 1960v Agreement- Cease-fire • Agreement between Military Representatives of India and Pakistan regarding the Establishment of Cease-Fire Line in the State of Jammu and Kashmir (Karachi, 27 July 1949)vi • Ceasefire Understanding (November 2003) in the interest of maintaining peace and tranquillity along the International Boundary, Line of Control, and the Actual Ground Position Line.vii First India-Pakistan Siachen talk started in January 1986 between the Defence Secretariesviii and the last 13th round of the talk took place in June 2012ix. Agreement- Peaceful Resolution of all Issues • The Simla Agreement 1972 x Agreement- Prohibition of Attack against Nuclear installations • The Agreement on the Prohibition of Attack against Nuclear installations (signed on 31 December 1988 and entered into force on 27 January 1991) and annual exchange list of Nuclear Installations and facilities covered xi Agreement- Advance notice • Agreement on advance notice on military exercises, manoeuvres and troop movements. Signed at New Delhi on 6 April 1991xii • Agreement between India and Pakistan on Pre-Notification of Flight Testing of Ballistic Missiles (October 2005) xiii Dialogue: • Composite Dialogue between India and Pakistan from 2004 to 2008, completed four rounds and the fifth round was in progress when it was paused in the wake of the Mumbai terrorist attack in November 2008. xiv Joint Judicial Committee: • Joint Judicial Committee on Prisoners (2007) to look into the humanitarian issue of civilian prisoners/fishermen held in each other’s jails xv Communication Measures: • Established mechanisms of hotlines, flag meetings, weekly talks between the Directorate Generals of Military Operations, as well as through diplomatic channelsxvi Economic Initiatives: • Status of the MFN accorded to Pakistan in 1996xvii, withdrawn after the Pulwama cross-border terror attack in February 2019xviii Cross-LoC CBMs for movement and trade (JWG on Cross-LoC CBMs): • Cross-LoC CBMs for movement and trade of people on both sides of the LoC in Jammu and Kashmir are in place including trade and travel on the Srinagar- Muzaffarabad (March 2005)xix and Poonch-Rawalakot (July 2011) routes respectively across the LoC. xx (Cross-LoC trade suspended by India from 19 April 2019xxi) • In addition, recommendations by Working Group led by Shri. M.K. Rasgotra on strengthening the Cross-LoC relations (April 2007). Visits to Religious Shrines: • Under the Protocol on 'Visits to Religious Shrines' signed by India and Pakistan in 1974xxii • Gurudwara Shri Nankana Sahib (Rawalpindi)xxiii • Gurudwara Shri Panja Sahib (Rawalpindi) • Other places of worship in Pakistanxxiv • Kartarpur Sahib: India decided to build Kartarpur Corridor from Dera Baba Nanak in Gurdaspur District of India to the International Border and operationalize it, Pakistan agreed to build the Corridor.xxv Enhanced people to people contacts through bus and train services: • Samjhauta Express (biweekly, with termini in Lahore and Delhi) • Attari-Wagah rail route is also open for movement of freight trains • Thar Express, weekly, from Munabao-India to Zero Point Railway Station near Khokrapar – Pakistan. • Bus services run between India and Pakistan on the following routes: Delhi- Lahore (all days except Sunday), Amritsar-Lahore (twice a week) and Amritsar- Nanankana (twice a week).xxvi Consultation Measures: • Indo-Pak Joint Commission established in 1982 to facilitate discussions at ministerial level.xxvii References i https://www.mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/5993/tashkent+declaration ii https://www.mea.gov.in/in-focus-article.htm?18997/lahore+declaration+february+1999 iii https://www.mea.gov.in/in-focus-article.htm?18997/lahore+declaration+february+1999 iv https://mea.gov.in/Uploads/PublicationDocs/19156_Kashmir_The_True_Story_19-01-2004.pdf v https://mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/6439/Indus vi https://mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/5252/Agreement+relating+to+Ceasefire+Line+in+JampK vii https://www.mea.gov.in/lok-sabha.htm?dtl/28780/question+no2861+summoning+of+pak+high+commissioner https://mea.gov.in/Uploads/PublicationDocs/19156_Kashmir_The_True_Story_19-01-2004.pdf viii P-5314,Indo-Pak Relations, VOL-I-X, Introduced and edited by Avtar Singh Bhasin, published by Public Diplomacy Division, MEA, http://mea.gov.in/Images/pdf/India-Pakistan-std.pdf ix http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=123561 x https://mea.gov.in/in-focus-article.htm?19005/Simla+Agreement+July+2+1972 xi https://mea.gov.in/Portal/LegalTreatiesDoc/PAB1232.pdf xii https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%201843/volume-1843-i-31420-english.pdf xiii http://mea.gov.in/Portal/LegalTreatiesDoc/PA05B0591.pdf xiv https://mea.gov.in/Portal/ForeignRelation/pakistan-august-2012.pdf xv https://www.mea.gov.in/press- releases.htm?dtl/29903/Indias_nominations_for_the_Joint_Judicial_Committee_on_Prisoners xvi https://www.mea.gov.in/lok-sabha.htm?dtl/28780/question+no2861+summoning+of+pak+high+commissioner xvii (India - Pakistan Relations: Recent Developments August 2012) https://mea.gov.in/Portal/ForeignRelation/pakistan-august-2012.pdf xviii https://www.mea.gov.in/rajya-sabha.htm?dtl/31550/question+no1459+bilateral+talks+with+pakistan xix https://mea.gov.in/rajya- sabha.htm?dtl/11101/q+1741+running+of+srinagarmuzaffarabad+bus+service+without+visa+and+passport xx https://mea.gov.in/bilateral- documents.htm?dtl/87/Joint+Statement+following+meeting+between+the+Minister+of+External+Affairs+of+India +and+Minister+of+Foreign+Affairs+of+Pakistan xxi https://www.mea.gov.in/rajya-sabha.htm?dtl/31550/question+no1459+bilateral+talks+with+pakistan xxii https://mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/6199/Protocol+on+visits+to+Religious+Shrines xxiii https://www.mea.gov.in/lok-sabha.htm?dtl/17821/q+3381handing+over+of+pak+based+gurdwara xxiv https://www.mea.gov.in/lok-sabha.htm?dtl/11925/q+1128+places+of+worship+in+pakistan xxv https://www.mea.gov.in/rajya-sabha.htm?dtl/30732/question+no347+opening+of+kartarpur+corridor xxvi https://mea.gov.in/Portal/ForeignRelation/pakistan-august-2012.pdf xxvii https://mea.gov.in/Portal/ForeignRelation/pakistan-august-2012.pdf .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lahore Declaration
    The Lahore Declaration The following is the text of the Lahore Declaration signed by the Prime Minister, Mr. A. B. Vajpayee, and the Pakistan Prime Minister, Mr. Nawaz Sharif, in Lahore on Sunday: The Prime Ministers of the Republic of India and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan: Sharing a vision of peace and stability between their countries, and of progress and prosperity for their peoples; Convinced that durable peace and development of harmonious relations and friendly cooperation will serve the vital interests of the peoples of the two countries, enabling them to devote their energies for a better future; Recognising that the nuclear dimension of the security environment of the two countries adds to their responsibility for avoidance of conflict between the two countries; Committed to the principles and purposes of the Charter of the United Nations, and the universally accepted principles of peaceful co- existence; Reiterating the determination of both countries to implementing the Simla Agreement in letter and spirit; Committed to the objective of universal nuclear disarmament and non- proliferartion; Convinced of the importance of mutually agreed confidence building measures for improving the security environment; Recalling their agreement of 23rd September, 1998, that an environment of peace and security is in the supreme national interest of both sides and that the resolution of all outstanding issues, including Jammu and Kashmir, is essential for this purpose; Have agreed that their respective Governments: · shall intensify their efforts to resolve all issues, including the issue of Jammu and Kashmir. · shall refrain from intervention and interference in each other's internal affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Council Distr.: General 25 November 2015
    United Nations S/2015/905 Security Council Distr.: General 25 November 2015 Original: English Letter dated 24 November 2015 from the Permanent Representative of Pakistan to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council Upon instructions from my Government, I have the honour to enclose copies of letters, written by the Adviser to the Prime Minister of Pakistan on National Security and Foreign Affairs (annex I) and the Foreign Secretary (annex II) to their Indian counterparts on 8 September 2015, regarding the following: (a) The letter from the Adviser proposes a mechanism for preserving the ceasefire arrangement of 2003 and ending ceasefire violations on the Line of Control and the Working Boundary; release of fishermen; and religious tourism; (b) The letter from the Foreign Secretary provides details of lack of cooperation by the Indian authorities in the Government of Pakistan’s efforts to effectively prosecute the accused in the Mumbai trial and lack of prosecution by the Indian authorities of the accused in the Samjhauta Express attack, in which 42 innocent Pakistanis lost their lives. I should be grateful if you could kindly circulate these letters as a document of the Security Council. (Signed) Maleeha Lodhi 15-20844 (E) 031215 *1520844* S/2015/905 Annex I to the letter dated 24 November 2015 from the Permanent Representative of Pakistan to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council Letter dated 8 September 2015 from the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Adviser to the Prime Minister on National Security and Foreign Affairs of Pakistan addressed to the Minister for External Affairs of India Even though the planned meeting between the two National Security Advisers could not take place, you would agree that sustainable peace and progress of South Asia and its people are inextricably linked to friendly relations between Pakistan and India.
    [Show full text]
  • Kashmir Conflict: a Critical Analysis
    Society & Change Vol. VI, No. 3, July-September 2012 ISSN :1997-1052 (Print), 227-202X (Online) Kashmir Conflict: A Critical Analysis Saifuddin Ahmed1 Anurug Chakma2 Abstract The conflict between India and Pakistan over Kashmir which is considered as the major obstacle in promoting regional integration as well as in bringing peace in South Asia is one of the most intractable and long-standing conflicts in the world. The conflict originated in 1947 along with the emergence of India and Pakistan as two separate independent states based on the ‘Two-Nations’ theory. Scholarly literature has found out many factors that have contributed to cause and escalate the conflict and also to make protracted in nature. Five armed conflicts have taken place over the Kashmir. The implications of this protracted conflict are very far-reaching. Thousands of peoples have become uprooted; more than 60,000 people have died; thousands of women have lost their beloved husbands; nuclear arms race has geared up; insecurity has increased; in spite of huge destruction and war like situation the possibility of negotiation and compromise is still absence . This paper is an attempt to analyze the causes and consequences of Kashmir conflict as well as its security implications in South Asia. Introduction Jahangir writes: “Kashmir is a garden of eternal spring, a delightful flower-bed and a heart-expanding heritage for dervishes. Its pleasant meads and enchanting cascades are beyond all description. There are running streams and fountains beyond count. Wherever the eye
    [Show full text]
  • Samjhauta Express Case Verdict
    Samjhauta Express Case Verdict Jess metaphrase northerly if multilineal Nels nid-nod or beaches. Jesse remains furcate after Rodd aggregate tactfully or gasiform.cavorts any altimetry. Flourishing Thorny bespangled no purfles spiral unaccompanied after Binky forays heavily, quite Zakir was devoid of the resultant fire could not allow your home in samjhauta express is required and all been tortured to appear in pakistani law Afghan national and planing to purchase property in Bahria town Islamabad. The investigators had therefore to move carefully and look at unimpeachable evidence to come to any conclusion about the actual perpetrators. The station consists of one platform. The NIA in its charge sheet had named eight persons as accused. Must I use the services of a USA visa center? Time updates on stories, as they get published on our website. Our pen analogy can be extended to renting property. Crime log Between India And Pakistan Safety Comparison. What happens after I have applied? Two unexploded suitcase bombs were also found in other compartments of the train. PR ordeal in busy places, so pick and choose your battles wisely. New India, however, abounds in mysteries. File photo of Swami Aseemanand. The Indian government and media initially began pointing the finger at Pakistan for the terror attacks. In its charge sheet, the NIA named, Naba Kumar Sarkar also known as Swami Aseemanand, Sunil Joshi, Lokesh Sharma, Sandeep Dange, Ramchandra Kalasangra, Rajinder Chaudhary and Kamal Chauhan as accused. What are the processing times and prices? However, the judge added, the call details of any mobile phone or any other evidence related to the ownership of any mobile phone by the suspects were not brought on record.
    [Show full text]
  • Limited Conflicts Under the Nuclear Umbrella: Indian and Pakistani
    Limited Conflicts Under the Nuclear Umbrella R Indian and Pakistani Lessons from the Kargil Crisis Ashley J. Tellis C. Christine Fair Jamison Jo Medby National Security Research Division This research was conducted within the International Security and Defense Policy Center (ISDPC) of RAND’s National Security Research Division (NSRD). NSRD conducts research and analysis for the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Commands, the defense agencies, the Department of the Navy, the U.S. intelligence community, allied foreign governments, and foundations. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Tellis, Ashley J. Limited conflicts under the nuclear umbrella : Indian and Pakistani lessons from the Kargil crisis / Ashley J. Tellis, C. Christine Fair, Jamison Jo Medby. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. “MR-1450.” ISBN 0-8330-3101-5 1. Kargil (India)—History, Military—20th century. 2. Jammu and Kashmir (India)—Politics and government—20th century. 3. India—Military relations— Pakistan. 4. Pakistan—Military relations—India. I. Fair, C. Christine. II. Medby, Jamison Jo. III. Title. DS486.K3347 T45 2001 327.5491054—dc21 2001048907 RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. © Copyright 2001 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Railways Plans for DFC, Multomodal & International Cargo
    Indian Railways Plans for DFC, Multomodal & International Rail Cargo Transportation Sanjiv Garg Additional Member Railway Board, India September 28, 2018 DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDORS Golden Quadrilateral & Its Diagonals High Density Corridor (Golden Quadrilateral DELHI + Diagonals) 16% of route KOLKATTA Km carries more than MUMBAI 52% of passenger & 58 % of freight CHENNAI www.dfccil.gov.in CONCEPT PLAN OF DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR NETWORK LUDHIANA DELHI KOLKATA MUMBAI Sanctioned projects VIJAYAWADA VASCO Unsanctioned projects CHENNAI www.dfccil.gov.in Eastern Corridor (1856 km) Khurja -Bhaupur (343 km) Bhaupur-Mughalsarai (402 km) Khurja-Ludhiana (400 km) Khurja-Dadri (47 km) Western Corridor (1504 km) Mughalsarai-Sonnagar (126 km) Rewari-Vadodara (947 km) Sonnagar-Dankuni (538 km) Vadodara-JNPT ( 430 km) Rewari-Dadri (127 km) 5 Introduction Feb 2006 CCEA approved feasibility reports of DFC. Nov 2007 CCEA gave ‘in principle’ approval with authorization to incur expenditure on preliminary and preparatory works. Feb 2008 CCEA approved undertaking work & extension of EDFC from Sonnagar to Dankuni. Directed MoR to finalise financing and implementation mechanisms Sept 2009 Cabinet approved JICA loan for WDFC along with STEP loan conditionalities Mar 2010 JICA Loan Agreement for JPY 90 billion (Rs. 5100 crores) signed for WDFC-I. Oct 2011 Loan Agreement with World Bank for USD 975 Million (Rs. 5850 crores) signed for EDFC -1 (Khurja-Bhaupur). Mar 2013 JICA Loan Agreement for WDFC Phase-II: 1st Tranche amounting JPY 136 billion (Rs. 7750 crores) signed. Dec 2014 Loan Agreement with World Bank loan of USD 1100 million signed (EDFC-2). June 2015 Cost estimate of Rs. 81,459 Crores approved by CCEA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Question of the India-Pakistan Conflict
    th th Online Model United Nations @ Newton International Academy II 2020 | 11 ​ – 14 ​ of November 2020 ​ ​ ​ ​ Forum: Sustainable Development Goals 16 Issue: The Question of India-Pakistan Conflict Student Officer: Maliha Muhajid Position: Head Chair Introduction Dispute after dispute, conflict after conflict, war after war: that is what the history of the India and Pakistan conflict looks like. The India-Pakistan conflict has been going on for years, and has been one of those conflicts that almost everyone has at least heard of; but more than that, it is one that has affected millions of lives till date. In the beginning, India and Pakistan weren’t separate nations. They were both previously ruled by the British, and in 1947, the countries gained their independence and were separated, with Pakistan containing a majority of the Muslims and India containing a majority of the Hindus. Though their independence could’ve led to more peaceful and positive happenings, what happened was the opposite, especially with the situation regarding Kashmir. The independence of the countries has led to unending internal and external conflicts between the two, and though the situation was close to getting better a few years prior, it almost seems impossible to turn the two enemies in favor of each other. Talking about enmity, it’s not only the governments who are constantly causing issues for each other, but rather, the residents of the countries’ have contributed majorly to the minor conflicts that have occured. It is said that only 5% of the Indian population view Pakistanis positively, and only 11% of the Pakistan’s population views Indians positively - shocking, right? Well, not for those who have been directly affected by these disputes and conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Annexure Transportation with Neighbouring
    ANNEXURE TRANSPORTATION WITH NEIGHBOURING COUNTRIES S. Name of the the details of inter-country bus, the details of pending proposals with No. country trains and shipping services the Ministry for increasing maintained by India with frequency of existing services or to neighbouring countries start services on new routes: (b) (a) 1 Bhutan Nil Nil 2 Nepal Bus: Regular bus services are in Proposals for following new routes operation on the following routes :- have been sent to Government of a) Kathmandu-Delhi Nepal:- b) Kathmandu-Varanasi (i) Dehradun-Mahendranagar c) Mahendranagar – Delhi and (ii) Kathmandu-Patna- d) Pokhara-Delhi Bodhgaya (iii) Janakpur-Patna Trains: Train services between The modalities for operationalizing Kolkata / Haldia ports (in India) the above mentioned bus services and Birgunj (in Nepal) for transit are being discussed with traffic and between stations of Government of Nepal. Indian Railways and Birgunj (in Nepal) for bilateral traffic are in operation. Shipping: Nil 3 Bangladesh Bus - There are following direct Bus – A new bus service is under bus services between India and consideration between Khulna Bangladesh:- (Bangladesh) - Kolkata (India) (i) Dhaka-Kolkata (ii) Dhaka-Agartala (iii) Guwahati – Shillong - Dhaka (iv) Kolkata-Dhaka-Agartala Trains - At present there are 3 Trains – Three more rail links are operational inter-country rail links proposed to be reopened between (broad gauge):- India and Bangladesh:- (i) Radhikapur (India) – Birol (I) Petrapole (India)-Benapole (Bangladesh) (Bangladesh) (ii) Karimganj/Mahisanan (India) – (ii) Gede (India) – Darsana Shahbazpur (Bangladesh) (Bangladesh) (iii) Haldibari (India) – Chilahati (iii) Singhabad (India) – Rohanpur (Bangladesh) (Bangladesh) Shipping – The Protocol on Inland New rail link is to be opened Water, Trade and Transit (PIWTT) between Akhaura (Bangladesh) – between India and Bangladesh Agartala (India) permits movement of goods over barges/vessels through the river system of Bangladesh on eight specific routes between India and Bangladesh.
    [Show full text]
  • TOP 100 Expected GK Questions on Indian Railways | Specially for RRB NTPC 2019
    TOP 100 Expected GK Questions on Indian Railways | Specially for RRB NTPC 2019 1) What is the rank of Indian Railways in the world in terms a) Himsagar Express of size of the railroad network? b) Silchar Superfast Express a) 2nd c) Navyug Express b) 5th d) Vivek Express c) 4th d) 10th Answer: d) Vivek Express covers the longest train route in India. It Answer: c) originates in northern Assam and goes all the way to the Indian Railways (IR) is India's national railway system southern tip of India to Kanyakumari. It has the running time operated by the Ministry of Railways. It manages the fourth of 80 hours and 15 minutes and the distance covered is largest railway network in the world by size, with 121,407 4,233 kilometres. kilometres of total track over a 67,368-kilometre route. 5) Which express is the currently operational trans-border 2) Which is India’s first passenger train that ran between train between India and Pakistan? Bombay and Thane in 1853? a) Thar Express a) Great Indian Peninsula Railway b) Akbar Express b) Central Railway c) Samjhauta Express c) Bombay Baroda Railway d) Both a and c d) Mumbai Suburban Railway Answer: d) Answer: a) Currently, there are two trans-border trains between India The Great Indian Peninsula Railway was incorporated on 1 and Pakistan. First Is Samjhauta Express that operates on August 1849 by an act of the British Parliament. It was a Delhi-Lahore Route via Attarti-Wagah Border whereas Thar predecessor of the Central Railway, whose headquarters Express links Jodhpur and Karachi via Munabao-Khokhrapar was at the Boree Bunder in Mumbai.It was India's first border crossing.
    [Show full text]
  • Involving India and Pakistan: Nuclear Arms Control and Non-Proliferation After the Nuclear Tests
    BITS Research Report 99.2 Oliver Meier Involving India and Pakistan: Nuclear Arms Control and Non-proliferation after the Nuclear Tests Berlin Information-center for Transatlantic Security (BITS) CONTENT: Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................. 5 1 Where we are............................................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 The situation in India ....................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 The situation in Pakistan................................................................................................................ 10 1.3 Bilateral relations after the tests.................................................................................................... 12 2 International Responses ....................................................................................................................... 14 2.1 The P5............................................................................................................................................... 16 2.2 The Western Group ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Strategic Chain Linking Pakistan, India, China, and the United States
    The Strategic Chain Linking Pakistan, India, China, and the United States Robert Einhorn Project Co-Chair W.P.S. Sidhu Project Co-Chair Arms Control and Non-Proliferation Series T HE S T RAT EGIC C HAIN : Linking Pakistan, India, China, and the United States Paper 14 • March 2017FOREIGN POLICY AT BROOKINGS • A RM S C ON T ROL AND N ON -P ROLIFERAT ION S ERIES i Acknowledgments We would like to express our deep gratitude to all project and Rachel Slattery for her assistance in the the Chinese, Indian, Pakistani, and American par- editing and production of the report. ticipants in the “Strategic Chain” project, who gen- erously gave their time to participate in our three Support for this project was generously provided by workshops and to work with us closely to final- the Naval Postgraduate School’s Project on Advanced ize this report. We would like to thank Brookings Systems and Concepts for Countering WMD via As- scholars Michael O’Hanlon and Steven Pifer for re- sistance Grant/Agreement No. N00244-15-l-0038 viewing the report. We would like to extend special awarded by NAVSUP FLC San Diego. The views thanks to Research Assistant and Project Coordina- expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the tor James Tyson for helping manage the project and official policies of NPS. We would also like to ex- for drafting the two Brookings background papers press our gratitude to the John D. and Catherine T. that appear in the annex. We also wish to thank Re- MacArthur Foundation for its generous support for search Assistants Caitlyn E.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.4 Pakistan Railway Assessment Pakistan Railway Assessment
    2.4 Pakistan Railway Assessment Pakistan Railway Assessment Page 1 The Pakistan Railways (PR) network is comprised of 7, 791 route kilometers; 7, 346km of broad gauge, and 445 km of metre gauge. There are 633 stations in the network, 1,043km of double-track sections (in total) and 285 km of electrified sections. The section of the network Karachi-Lodhran (843km) and 193km of other short sections are double tracks, and 286km from Lahore to Khanewal is electrified. The PR network is also connected to three neighbouring countries: Iran at Taftan, India at Wagha, and Afghanistan at Chaman and Landi Kotal. The Main Line (official route name) connects the following major stations: Karachi, Multan, Lahore, Rawalpindi, and Peshawar. The existing Pakistan Railway network is shown below: Out of the 7,791 km railway network, double track sections account for 1,043km in total and electrified sections for 285km. The network is classified into 5 sections: Primary A ( 2,124km), Primary B ( 2,622km), Secondary (1,185km), Tertiary (1,416km), and Metre Gauge (439km). The double track sections are only 1,043km and mostly located in the most critical section (Karachi City – Lahore City). Most of the tracks along the PR network are laid on embankments. There are a total of 14,570 bridges of which 22 bridges are recognized as large scale bridges. Almost all of these were constructed a century ago, and now require rehabilitation work. The PR has 520 diesel locomotives, 23 electric locomotives, and 14 steam locomotives. Most of these are aging and require upgrades. The signaling system is insufficient for the current operations, and neither is the telecommunication system.
    [Show full text]