Program Query
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
DELIBERATE DIFFERENCES Progressive and Conservative Campus Activism in the United States
A REPORT PUBLISHED BY POLITICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES DELIBERATE DIFFERENCES Progressive and Conservative Campus Activism in the United States by Pam Chamberlain PRA POLITICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES ABOUT POLITICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES Political Research Associates (PRA) is an independent, nonprofit research center that exposes and challenges the Right and larger oppressive movements, institutions, and forces. PRA provides accurate applied research and useful analytic tools to inform and support progressive activism that promotes equality and justice. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Pam Chamberlain is a researcher at PRA. Political Research Associates 1310 Broadway, Suite 201 Somerville, MA 02144 Tel: (617) 666-5300 Fax: (617) 666-6622 [email protected] www.publiceye.org August, 2004 © 2004, Political Research Associates ISBN: 0-915987-18-x When referencing this document, we recommend the following citation: Chamberlain, Pam. Deliberate Differences: Progressive and Conservative Campus Activism in the United States. Somerville, Mass.: Political Research Associates, 2004. Design by Hird Graphic Design Cover photos by: top, Lonny Shavelson/www.photowords.com. and bottom, Jim West, Impact Digitals Acknowledgements eliberate Differences: Progressive and Conservative Campus Activism is a publication of DPolitical Research Associates (PRA). In every sense, this report has been a collabo- rative effort from its inception. Jean Hardisty, President Emerita of PRA, originally con- ceived the Campus Activism Project as an extension of earlier PRA work on conservative campus groups. The PRA staff team—Nikhil Aziz, Chip Berlet, Shelly Harter, Tom Louie, Namorya Nelson, and Palak Shah—all lent their creativity, talent, and careful attention to the many stages of the project. Chip and Nikhil, in particular, contributed to our understanding of social movement theory and its application to campus activism. -
Working Against Racism from White Subject Positions: White Anti-Racism, New Abolitionism & Intersectional Anti-White Irish Diasporic Nationalism
Working Against Racism from White Subject Positions: White Anti-Racism, New Abolitionism & Intersectional Anti-White Irish Diasporic Nationalism By Matthew W. Horton A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education and the Designated Emphasis in Critical Theory in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Dr. Na’ilah Nasir, Chair Dr. Daniel Perlstein Dr. Keith Feldman Summer 2019 Working Against Racism from White Subject Positions Matthew W. Horton 2019 ABSTRACT Working Against Racism from White Subject Positions: White Anti-Racism, New Abolitionism & Intersectional Anti-White Irish Diasporic Nationalism by Matthew W. Horton Doctor of Philosophy in Education and the Designated Emphasis in Critical Theory University of California, Berkeley Professor Na’ilah Nasir, Chair This dissertation is an intervention into Critical Whiteness Studies, an ‘additional movement’ to Ethnic Studies and Critical Race Theory. It systematically analyzes key contradictions in working against racism from a white subject positions under post-Civil Rights Movement liberal color-blind white hegemony and "Black Power" counter-hegemony through a critical assessment of two major competing projects in theory and practice: white anti-racism [Part 1] and New Abolitionism [Part 2]. I argue that while white anti-racism is eminently practical, its efforts to hegemonically rearticulate white are overly optimistic, tend toward renaturalizing whiteness, and are problematically dependent on collaboration with people of color. I further argue that while New Abolitionism has popularized and advanced an alternative approach to whiteness which understands whiteness as ‘nothing but oppressive and false’ and seeks to ‘abolish the white race’, its ultimately class-centered conceptualization of race and idealization of militant nonconformity has failed to realize effective practice. -
To: <[email protected]>
From: "Sheri Herndon" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> X-Priority: 3 Message-ID: <r02000200-1034-39844466DD9611D8AA3C000A95AC8380@[10.0.1.2]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mailsmith 2.0.2 (Blindsider) X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Spam-Status: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-6.398, required 6,autolearn=not spam, AWL 0.00, BAYES_00 -4.90, FROM_ORG -3.00,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO 1.50) X-Loop: [email protected] X-Sequence: 28 Errors-To: [email protected] Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: <discussion.lists.nwsocialforum.org> List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe%20discussion> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe%20discussion> List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]> List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> List-Archive: <http://lists.nwsocialforum.org/lists/arc/discussion> Subject: [discussion] Fwd: What Exactly Is a Social Forum? X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='EXCUSE_3 0.001, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __SOBIG_X_MAILSCANNER 0, __X_MAIL_SCANNER 0, __HAS_X_LOOP 0, X_LOOP 0, FWD_MSG 0, TO_BE_REMOVED_REPLY 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, file:///Users/tom%20collicott/Desktop/discussion-list-archive.txt[11/6/20, 4:00:53 PM] REMOVE_FROM_LIST 0.000, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' ====== Forwarded Message ====== Date: 7/24/04 10:14 AM Received: 7/24/04 5:16 PM -0000 From: [email protected] (The Nation Magazine) To: [email protected] Dear EmailNation Subscriber, Kicking off last night, the Boston Social Forum is the foremost gathering of progressives in Boston this week as the Democrats assemble at the Fleet Center for their convention. -
How Public Universities React to Alt-Right Speakers By
Towson University Office of Graduate Studies Responding to Hate: How Public Universities React to Alt-Right Speakers by Josh Guttman A thesis Presented to the faculty of Towson University Office of Graduate Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Masters of Science in Communications Management Department of Communication Towson University Towson, Maryland 21252 (December, 2018) DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my mom and dad, who supported me and cheered me on when I needed it most. I love you both and I can’t thank you enough. I made it through the Paper Chase (1973). *Rocky (1976) music swells in the background* RESPONDING TO HATE ii RESPONDING TO HATE iii Abstract This study examined how public universities who have hosted alt-right speakers on campus protected their reputations while also fostering a free speech environment and keeping students safe. Due to the First Amendment policies of public universities, they have a greater obligation to provide alt-right speakers a platform. However, alt-right speaking events pose risks among the university community such as violence and vandalism. These risks could potentially damage the reputation of the university. Through utilizing Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) and gathering primary documents from the universities, this study showcases the effectiveness of university strategies in regards to balancing a first amendment while maintaining student safety. The results showed university strategies that were in-line with SCCT were more effective at maintaining their reputations and keeping students safe. Hosting events dedicated to university values and engaging in the community protected their reputations leading up to and during the alt-right speaking events. -
Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 4 May 2012
United Nations E/CN.9/2012/INF/1 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 4 May 2012 Original: English/French/Spanish Commission on Population and Development Forty-fifth session 23-27 April 2012 List of delegations Liste des délégations Lista de las delegaciones Note: Delegations are requested to send their corrections to the following list in writing to the Secretary of the Commission, Room IN-613C, 200 East 42nd Street (fax: (212) 963-5305). Note: Les délégations sont priées d’envoyer leurs corrections à la présente liste, par écrit, à la Secrétaire de la Commission, bureau IN-613C, 200 East 42nd Street (fax: (212) 963-5305). Nota: Se ruega a las delegaciones se sirvan enviar sus correcciones a la siguiente lista, por escrito, a la Secretaría de la Comisión, oficina IN-613C, 200 East 42nd Street (fax: (212) 963-5305). Chair: H.E. Mr. Hasan Kleib (Indonesia) Vice-Chairs: Ms. Martina Težak Budišić (Croatia) Mr. William Awinador-Kanyirige (Ghana) Mr. Pius Wennubst (Switzerland) Mr. Sérgio Rodrigues dos Santos (Brazil) 12-33123 (E) 100512 *1233123* E/CN.9/2012/INF/1 MEMBERS MEMBRES MIEMBROS COUNTRY REPRESENTATIVE ALTERNATES ADVISERS PAYS REPRESENTANT SUPPLEANTS CONSEILLERS PAIS REPRESENTANTE SUPLENTES CONSEJEROS Algeria Mr. Mohamed Salah Mr. Mourad Benmehidi Mr. Larbi Djacta Eddine Belaid Angola Mr. Mario Rogerio Baptista Mr. Ismael Abraão Mr. António Coelho von Haff Gaspar Martins Ramos da Cruz Mr. Mabel Alipui Mr. Braulio Constantino Bangladesh Ms. Samia Anjum Mr. Abulkalam Abdul Mr. Md. Mustafizur Mr. Iqbal Ahmed Momen Rahman Mr. Shelley Salehin Belarus Mr. Andrei Dapkiunas Ms. Irina Velichko Ms. Larisa Belskaya Mr. -
Wages for Housework Pdf
Wages for housework pdf Continue The global feminist movement The International Wages for Housework Campaign (IWFHC) is a grassroots women's network that campaigns for the recognition and payment of all charitable work, at home and abroad. It was initiated in 1972 by Selma James[1] who first filed the wage demand for domestic chores at the third National Women's Liberation Conference in Manchester, England. The IWFHC says they start with those with less power internationally - homeless workers at home (mothers, housewives, home workers denied pay), and farmers and subsistence workers without waves on land and in the community. They believe that the demand for wages for unpaid charity work is also a perspective and a way of organizing from the bottom up, of the autonomous sectors working together to end the power relations between them. History salaries for household chores were one of six lawsuits in women, unions and labor or what should not be done[2], which James presented as a document at the third National Women's Liberation Conference. The power of women and subversion of the community[3], which James co-authored with Mariarosa Dalla Costa, which opened the domestic labor debate and became a classic of the women's movement, was published shortly after Women, the Unions and Work. The first edition of Power of Women did not come out for salaries for household chores; its third edition, in 1975, did so. After the Manchester conference, James with three or four other women formed the Power of Women Collective in London and Bristol to campaign for domestic chores wages. -
“Tales of the Grim Sleeper” by Nick Broomfield
CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF RACISM, SOCIAL JUSTICE, & HEALTH Co-Sponsored with the Ralph J. Bunche Center for African American Studies and the Gary B. Nash Endowed Chair Film Screening & Discussion “Tales of the Grim Sleeper” By Nick Broomfield This film digs into the case of the notorious serial killer known as the Grim Sleeper, who terrorized black and other women in South Central LA over 25 years. Friday, May 18, 2018 12:00pm – 3:00pm ~ Room 33-105 CHS Fielding School of Public Health (Center for Health Sciences) Panelists: Margaret Prescod of KPFK Radio and Nana Gyamfi, human & civil rights attorney MARGARET PRESCOD In the mid-1980’s, in response to police reports of the serial murders of Black Women in South LA, Margaret founded the Black Coalition Fighting Back Serial Murders which resulted in the establishment of a reward by LA City and an LAPD task force to investigate the murders. Her work was reflected in the recent HBO film about the murders entitled “Tales of the Grim Sleeper.” The film was short listed for an Academy Award. She is the host and producer of “Sojourner Truth” a popular nationally syndicated drive-time public affairs program on Pacifica Radio’s KPFK in Los Angeles, WBAI in New York City and WPFW in Washington DC as well as several other stations. NANA GYAMFI Known as the ‘People's Attorney,' Nana Gyamfi is a human and civil rights advocate who seeks to address the social justice challenges of the community through legal advocacy, involvement in local causes and activism. In addition to being an attorney in private practice, she runs the Crenshaw Legal Clinic where she provides legal-ease workshops providing knowledge on civil rights, and is an adjunct professor at Cal State University Los Angeles in the Pan African Studies Department. -
The Achievements of 50 Years
MEASURE EVALUATION TR-15-101 Family Planning in Latin America and the Caribbean: The Achievements of 50 Years April 2015 Jane T. Bertrand, PhD, MBA Victoria M. Ward, PhD Roberto Santiso-Gálvez, MD TR-15-101 Family Planning in Latin America and the Caribbean: The Achievements of 50 Years April 2015 Jane T. Bertrand, PhD, MBA Victoria M. Ward, PhD Roberto Santiso-Galvez, MD TR-15-101 ISBN 978-1-943364-00-8 MEASURE Evaluation is funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) under cooperative agreement AID-OAA-L-14-00004. MEASURE Evaluation, whose staff provided editorial, formatting, and distribution assistance, is implemented by the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, in association with Futures Group; ICF International; John Snow, Inc.; Management Sciences for Health; and Tulane University. The opinions expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States government. Suggested citation: Bertrand JT, Ward VM, Santiso-Gálvez R. Family Planning in Latin America and the Caribbean: The Achievements of 50 Years. Chapel Hill, NC: MEASURE Evaluation; 2015. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The co-authors owe a debt of gratitude to three individuals who devoted vast amounts of their time and energy to this report: Kime McClintock and Jerry Parks (lead research assistants at Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine) and Maria Cristina Rosales (editorial assistant in Guatemala). Their dedication in conducting background research, fact checking, verifying references, and editing text greatly enhanced the quality of the final product. In addition, we thank Nicole Carter, Alejandra Leyton, and Maayan Jaffe for their contributions as research assistants to specific sections of the report. -
THE GLOBAL SOCIAL FORUM MOVEMENT Michael Menser
THE GLOBAL SOCIAL FORUM MOVEMENT Michael Menser PORTO ALEGRE’S “PARTICIPATORY BUDGET,” AND THE MAXIMIZATION OF DEMOCRACY INTRODUCTION COUNTER-HEGEMONIC GLOBALIZATION AND THE DEMOCRATIC IMPULSE The World Social Forum is a new social and political phenomenon. The fact that it does have antecedents does not diminish its new- ness. Rather, quite the opposite. It is not an event, nor a mere suc- cession of events. It is not a scholarly conference, although the contributions of many scholars converge in it. It is not a party or an international of parties, although militants and activists of many parties all over the world take part in it. It is not an NGO [non-gov- ernmental organization] or confederation of NGOs, even though its conception and organization owes a great deal to them. It is not a social movement, even though it often designates itself as a move- ment of movements. Although it presents itself as an agent of social change, the WSF rejects the concept of a historical subject and confers no priority on any specific social actor in the process of social change. It holds no clearly defined ideology either in defin- ing what it rejects or what it asserts. (Santos 2003, 235) The possibility of democracy on a global scale is emerging today for the very first time. (Hardt and Negri 2004 xi) HROUGHOUT THE 1990S, the fragmentation of the US and global Left inspired as much ridicule as it did critical analysis. A seemingly Tinfinite series of splits occurred along a variety of axes: ethnic and racial identity, geographical place, sexual orientation/practices, organization type, lifestyle choice, relationships with nonhumans, degree of ideological purity, and on and on. -
Pacifica Radio Syndicated Program Directory
PACIFICA RADIO SYNDICATED PROGRAM DIRECTORY The following programs are distributed through the Pacifica network. Some are produced by Pacifica stations or the network itself; others are independent productions that use Pacifica distribution channels. To suggest additions or changes to this guide for future editions, write to Pacifica Network Affiliates Coordinator Ursula Ruedenberg, [email protected]. WEEKLY PROGRAMS (30-60 min) Alternative Radio New Dimensions Are We Alone? Off The Hook Behind the News Poetswest Between the Lines Sea Change Radio Bookwaves Sierra Club Radio Brain Labor Report Sojourner Truth Radio Building Bridges Song of the Soul Century of Lies Spirit in Action Corporate Watchdog Radio Spoiler Alert Radio Counterspin Sprouts Cultural Baggage Taking Aim Earthbeat Talk Nation Radio Electromatic Radio The 300-350 Show (Climate Radio) Encounters The Global Report Exploration This Way Out Flashpoints (Best of) Time of Useful Consciousness From the Vault Uprising GRIT Radio Urban Herbalist Indigenous Politics We News Law and Disorder What's At Stake Madness Radio WINGS Making Contact Writer's Voice Midweek Politics Yin Radio MyNDTALK Your Own Health And Fitness DAILY PROGRAMS (30-60 min) Against the Grain (3 days/week) Free Speech Radio News Brain Labor Report Hard Knock Radio Democracy Now! Informativo Pacifica Flashpoints MODULES WEEKLY PROGRAM MODULES (<10 min) Black Agenda Report Peak Oil Check-In Media Minutes Weekly Radio Spin DAILY PROGRAM MODULES (<10 min) 4:20 Drug War News Workers Independent News Jim Hightower’s Commentaries AGAINST THE GRAIN Program logo courtesy of KPFA C.S. Soong PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Against the Grain features intelligent, in-depth interviews with progressive and radical scholars and activists. -
How to Sthart a Can Chapter
The Campus Antiwar Network (CAN ) is an independent, democratic, grassroots network of campus- and school-based antiwar committees. The points of unity of CAN are: 1. We stand opposed to all US wars of aggression 2. We stand opposed to the Campus occupation of Iraq 3. We support the right of the Iraqi people to self- determination 4. We demand the immediate withdrawal of all troops from Iraq 5. We demand that the US government pay reparations to the Iraqi people 6. We stand opposed to the oppression of the Palestinian people and Antiwar the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip 7. We stand opposed to racist scapegoating and all attacks on civil liberties 8. We demand money for education, jobs and healthcare, not war and occupation! Network 22. "Weapons Dossier Claim Absurd," BBC News, May 30, 2003. 23.Ciar Byrne, "BBC chiefs stress need to attribute war sources," The Guardian, March 28, 2003. 24. James Cox and Peter Eisler, "U.S. gears up to unmask illegal arms," USA Today, April 8, 2003. 25. Goldberg, "Why don't we care about the WMD?" 26. "Timeline: Iraq," The Guardian. 27. Mike Allen, "Bush: we found' Banned Weapons," Washington Post, May 31, 2003. Weapons 28. CIA, "Iraqi Mobile Biological Warfare Agent Production Plants," released May 28, 2003. 29. "Insufficient Evidence," ABCnews.com, May 21, 2003. 30. Peter Beaumont, Antony Barnett and Gaby Hinsliff, "Iraq mobile labs nothing to do with germ warfare, report finds," The Observer, June 15, 2003. 31. Greg Miller, "2 suspect labs could have produced hydrogen," L.A. -
October 2007 in This Pa111phlet
.:/~ . Special Supplement $2 Internationalist Why We Fight for workers strikes Against the war (/) c (1) ~ 0 (Q (Q fill) Defeat U.S. Imperialist War and the Bosses' VVar "At Home"! Break with the Democrats - For a Class-Struggle Workers Party! An Internationalist Group Pamphlet October 2007 In this pa111phlet... Internationalist Group - League for the Fourth International Why We Fight for Workers Strikes Against the War (and the Trotskyism and One of a series of Opportunists Don't) ............................... 3 Internationalist Group Trade-Union Struggle British Antiwar Train Drivers class readings. Stop Arms .............................................. 6 Includes articles from Lenin and Trotsky on Oakland Dock Workers Honor Picket, trade-union struggle, Shut Down War Cargo Shipper ......... 7 articles from The Internationalist, plus a Protest Against Racist Cop Attack series of articles from on Bay Area Longshore Workers ........ 9 the 1970s on Mumia Abu-Jamal: Communist and Trotskyist work in the Beaten on the Docks .......................... 10 trade unions. Internationalist Group Class Readings ILWU Dock Workers Under Attack ....... 11 December 2005 S2 US$2 SL Rejects Calls for Labor Strikes Against Imperialist War Moves ........ 14 Order from/make checks payable to: Mundial Publications, Box 3321, Church Street Station, New York, New York 10008, U.S.A. ILWU: Defense Victory in Neptune Jade Picket Case ................ 17 Visit the League for the Fourth International/ Strike to Defend ILWU Union Gains Under Attack! ....................................... 21 Internationalist Group on the Internet Bush Uses Slave Labor Law Against http://www. internationalist. org West Coast Dock Workers ................. 24 Now available on our site: • Founding Statement of the Mobilize International Labor Action Internationalist Group to Defend the ILWU! ..........................