Review of Key Reforms in the Urban Water Supply and Sanitation Sector of the Russian Federation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Review of Key Reforms in the Urban Water Supply and Sanitation Sector of the Russian Federation INSTITUTE OF URBAN ECONOMICS REVIEW OF KEY REFORMS IN THE URBAN WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION SECTOR OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Final Report Prepared for the OECD by Institute of Urban Economics Moscow 2004 2 CONTENTS Introduction .....................................................................................................................................3 Chapter 1. Technical and Economic Condition and Financial Standing of the Water Supply and Sanitation Sector in the Russian Federation....................................................................................3 1.1. Coverage with WSS Services...............................................................................................3 1.2. Physical Condition and Accident Rate of Fixed Assets .......................................................3 1.3. Investment in Fixed Assets in WSS .....................................................................................4 1.4. Financing the Sector Utilities ...............................................................................................5 1.4.1. Tariff Regulation Practices............................................................................................5 1.4.2. Collection Rate and Payment System............................................................................6 1.4.3. Installation of Water Meters and Switch to Billing for Services Based on Actual Consumption............................................................................................................................8 1.4.4. Non-cash Payments .......................................................................................................8 1.5. Financial Standing of the WSS Utilities...............................................................................8 1.5.1. Financial Performance...................................................................................................8 1.5.2. Arrears of the WSS Utilities..........................................................................................9 Chapter 2. Institutional and Legal Reforms...................................................................................10 2.1. Strategic Planning of Reform .............................................................................................10 2.1.1. Development of the Sector Development/Reform Strategy........................................10 2.1.2. Solving the Issue of the WSS Utilities’ Arrears..........................................................11 2.1.3. Medium-Term Planning of Capital Investment in the WSS Infrastructure.................11 2.1.4. Decentralization: Delegation of Responsibility and Powers to Lower Level of Government ...........................................................................................................................11 2.2. Tariff Regulation ................................................................................................................12 2.3. Technical and Environmental Regulation of the WSS.......................................................13 2.4. Ownership in Fixed Assets of the WSS..............................................................................14 2.5. Ownership Management.....................................................................................................15 2.6. Private Sector Participation ................................................................................................16 2.6.1. Emergence of a New Trend.........................................................................................16 2.6.2. Barriers to Private Business.........................................................................................16 2.7. Transparency of WSS Utilities...........................................................................................17 Chapter 3. Social Protection and Environmental Protection .........................................................17 3.1. Social Protection of Population ..........................................................................................17 3.1.1. Setting Household Tariff below Economically Sound Level......................................18 3.1.2. Lowering the Cost of Services for Some Categories of Individuals below Household Tariff......................................................................................................................................19 3.2. Affordability of WSS Services...........................................................................................21 3.3. Public Participation ............................................................................................................22 3.4. Environmental Trends ........................................................................................................22 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................23 References .....................................................................................................................................26 Attachment 1. EBRD-funded Projects in the WSS of Russia .......................................................28 3 RUSSIAN FEDERATION Introduction Russian Federation water supply and sanitation (WSS) sector is for many years in a rather difficult situation. High deterioration of the infrastructure results in frequent accidents and interruptions in water supply and the system may technologically collapse rather soon. Significant arrears may lead to financial disintegration of the system as well. Efficiency of the Russian water utilities remains low. Prevalence of the administrative system of management, incomplete financing (primarily, from the budget), and inadequate tariff regulation still deprive the WSS utilities of the incentives to cut non-productive costs. Nevertheless, over the past four years a number of negative trends have been stopped and in some cases prevailed. Further depreciation of fixed assets, increase in accident rate, and financial losses build up were successfully dealt with. The payment collection rate from the households was noticeably increased and a budget funding deficit of the sector was reduced. Over the past four years, the legal and regulatory framework was significantly improved by establishing more advanced and fair “rules of the game,” when the Federal Subprogram “Reform and Modernization of the Housing and Communal Complex in the Russian Federation” was adopted in 2001. To elaborate on the provisions of the Subprogram, federal-level “Fundamentals of Pricing…” [32] were adopted, and Laws “On the General Principles of Tariff Control…” [18] and “On Investment Agreements…” [17] were drafted and to be ready for adoption. All the documents were developed in the spirit of the Almaty Guiding Principles; in many respects, they elaborate on principles and provide a sound foundation for the future sustainable development of the WSSS in Russian Federation. In Russian Federation over the past two years private business has become more proactively involved in operating the WSSS. Currently at least nine large companies, including three foreign operators work in the sector and some fifteen delegated management contracts have been concluded so far. Relatively brief experience of the private sector participation has already produced positive results. However, barriers inherited from the Soviet times still hinder broader private sector participation. This proves that the implementation of the Guiding Principles has just started and that there is still a lot to accomplish in order to complete the task. Chapter 1. Technical and Economic Condition and Financial Standing of the Water Supply and Sanitation Sector in the Russian Federation 1.1. Coverage with WSS Services WSS services coverage in Russian Federation remains on a rather high level. In 2003 the Institute of Urban Economic (IUE) conducted monitoring of water utilities in urban areas and reported that the level of centralized WSS coverage has been increased in 2002-2003. In large cities, water services coverage reached level of 95 percent of population; in medium-sized and small cities, it went up from 86.4 percent to 88.6 percent [4]. The increase can be attributed to the replacement of wells and street standpipes with centralized water supply in each individual household (a stand-pipe in the backyard or a tap in the house) According to the same report, sanitation services coverage has remained practically unchanged in 2000-2003, on the level of 73.3 percent in the first half of 2003. 1.2. Main Assets Physical Conditions and Accident Rate 4 In March 2003, Russian Gosstroy evaluated technical conditions of the WSS main assets. Based on the evaluation the level of water supply networks depreciation reached 65.3% and the depreciation of sanitation networks reached the level of 62.5% (as of 1 January 2003). Note that this is an “accounting depreciation” while the actual status of the main assets is extremely difficult to estimate, taking into account the insufficient financing for maintenance and operations. However, even according to accounting calculations, as of 1 January 2002 at least 29% of the water supply networks and at least 17% of the sanitation networks needed to be urgently replaced and the situation has not significantly changed over the past two years. According to the Goskomstat, 21% of the entire water pipelines needed to be urgently replaced by the end of 2003. Water losses and the magnitude
Recommended publications
  • European Science Review
    European science review № 11–12 2014 November-December «East West» Association for Advanced Studies and Higher Education GmbH Vienna 2014 European Sciences review Scientific journal № 11–12 2014 (November-December) ISSN 2310-5577 Editor-in-chief Lucas Koenig, Austria Consulting editors Uwe Eisenberg, Austria Minik Olsen, Sweden International editorial board Melinda Boros, Hungary Miroslavka Murkovič, Slovenia Jana Ilyna, Russia Wu Pan, China Dragan Novak, Croatia Bondarenko Natalia, Russia Dirk Eggers, Germany Yashkova Tatiana, Russia Proofreading Kristin Theissen Cover design Andreas Vogel Additional design Stephan Friedman Editorial office European Science Review “East West” Association for Advanced Studies and Higher Education GmbH, Am Gestade 1 1010 Vienna, Austria Email: [email protected] Homepage: www.ew-a.org European Science Review is an international, German/English/Russian language, peer-reviewed journal. It is published bimonthly with circulation of 1000 copies. The decisive criterion for accepting a manuscript for publication is scientific quality. All research articles published in this jour- nal have undergone a rigorous peer review. Based on initial screening by the editors, each paper is anonymized and reviewed by at least two anonymous referees. Recommending the articles for publishing, the reviewers confirm that in their opinion the submitted article contains important or new scientific results. Instructions for authors Full instructions for manuscript preparation and submission can be found through the “East West” Association GmbH home page at: http://www.ew-a.org. Material disclaimer The opinions expressed in the conference proceedings do not necessarily reflect those of the «East West» Association for Advanced Studies and Higher Education GmbH, the editor, the editorial board, or the organization to which the authors are affiliated.
    [Show full text]
  • EAP Task Force
    EAP Task Force Document 5 Joint Meeting of the EU Water Initiative’s EECCA Working Group and the EAP Task Force Environmental Finance and Water Networks 29 March –1 April 2005, Chisinau, Moldova Overview of Domestic and International Private Companies Operating in the Water Utilities Sector in Russian Federation Participants are invited to take note of the document and to comment on it as appropriate. ACTION REQUIRED: For information, discussion, and endorsement. TABLE OF CONTENT: USED ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS..................................................................3 PREFACE........................................................................................................................4 ANALYTICAL SUMMARY...............................................................................................6 CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE COMPANIES OPERATING IN UTILITIES SECTOR IN RUSSIA..................................19 CHAPTER 2. EXPERIENCE OF DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE COMPANIES IN IMPLEMENTING SPECIFIC PROJECTS......................................................................28 RUSSIAN UTILITY SYSTEMS....................................................................................................................29 ROSVODOKANAL......................................................................................................................................33 NEW URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE OF PRIKAMYE..................................................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • A N N E X E S
    13255/07 Georgia v. Russia (I) A N N E X E S Annex 1 Summary of documents submitted by the applicant Government I. In their application of 27 March 2007 A. Summary of documents in English and Russian C. Summary of statements of Georgian citizens B. + D. Summary of media coverage of events II. In their observations in reply of 5 May 2008 Summary of documents in Georgian / Russian Annex 2 Summary of documents submitted by the respondent Government I. In their observations of 26 December 2007 . Summary of documents in Russian II. In their additional observations of 23 September 2008 . Summary of documents in Russian Annex 3 Report of 22 January 2007 by the monitoring committee of the Parliamentary Assembly 1 13255/07 Georgia v. Russia (I) Annex 1 I. A. Summary of the documents in English and Russian submitted by the applicant Government in their application of 27 March 2008 number Document type date 1 Summary/Translation The applicant Government submitted the Agreement between Georgia and Russia on the Terms and Rules of the temporary functioning and withdrawal of Russian Military Bases and other military facilities belonging to the Group of Russian Military Forces in Transcaucasia deployed on the Territory of Georgia. The Agreement was drawn up in Russian and Georgian and signed by both parties in Sochi, Russian Federation, on 31 March 2006. number Document type date 2 A. Council of Europe press release 6 October 2006; B. Council of the European Union press release 16-17 October 2006; C. Speech by Ms Benita Ferrero-Waldner, member 25 October 2006 of the European Commission with responsibility for and 6 March 2007 External Relations and European Neighbourhood Policy D.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast
    THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF TERRITORIES OF RAS ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CHANGES: FACTS, TRENDS, FORECAST 6 (24) 2012 The journal is published according to the decision of RAS economic institutions’ administration in the North-West federal district Institute of Socio-Economic and Energy Problems of the North Komi scientific centre of the Ural RAS department (Komi Republic) Institute of Economics of Karelian scientific centre of RAS (Karelia Republic) G.P. Luzin Institute of Economic Problems of Kola scientific centre of RAS (the Murmansk Oblast) Institute of Socio-Economic Development of Territories of RAS (the Vologda Oblast) and according to the decision of St. Petersburg State University of Engineering and Economics administration and other RF regions Institute of Social and Economic Research of Ufa Science Centre of RAS (Bashkortostan Republic) Institute of Economics, the Research of the Ural RAS department (the Sverdlovsk Oblast) The decision of Presidium of the Higher Attestation Commission of the Russian MES (№6/6, dated 19.02.2010) the journal is included in the list of leading scientific editions, recommended for publication of the main results of dissertations for the degree of Doctor and Candidate of Sciences. Editorial council: RAS academician V.L. Makarov (Moscow, Russia) RAS academician V.V. Ivanter (Moscow, Russia) RAS academician V.V. Okrepilov (St. Petersburg, Russia) RAS academician A.I. Tatarkin (Yekaterinburg, Russia) Belarus NAS academician P.A. Vityaz (Minsk, Belarus) Belarus NAS academician P.G. Nikitenko (Minsk, Belarus) RAS corresponding member V.N. Lazhentsev (Syktyvkar, Russia) Professor J. Sapir (Paris, France) Doctor of Economics, professor S.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Administration: the Main Components of Model and Its Development in Russia
    Review of European Studies; Vol. 6, No. 4; 2014 ISSN 1918-7173 E-ISSN 1918-7181 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education “Service” Municipal Administration: The Main Components of Model and Its Development in Russia Svetlana Eduardovna Martynova1 1 Department, Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russian Federation Correspondence: Svetlana Eduardovna Martynova, Tomsk State University, 36 Lenin Ave., Tomsk 634050, Russian Federation. Tel: 8-913-825-1703. E-mail: [email protected] Received: September 18, 2014 Accepted: November 7, 2014 Online Published: November 15, 2014 doi:10.5539/res.v6n4p223 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/res.v6n4p223 Abstract Implementation of the “public service” model is possible if its components are thoroughly thought-out: purpose and functions of governing boards are definite, conditions for achieving the desired result are set, and initial condition of public management system allows the development. In the modern literature the role of local government is reduced to the execution of policy of the central government. The authors see the development of public services primarily in economic and organizational aspects. The purpose of this article is to identify the major elements of the integrated model of “public service” as a model of a new relationship between municipal authority and local community, as well as to analyze the current state of municipal administration in Russia. The analysis of scientific publications, the content analysis of sites of the Russian municipalities and the opinion poll of municipal employees were used as the main methods of research. The following article: 1) defines a set of basic elements of the “service” model for municipal administration; 2) describes the gap between the “model” and the current state of “service” municipal administration in Russia; 3) suggests social technologies for the approximation of municipal administration to the desirable state.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection of Reports on Situation with Human Rights in the Russian Federation in 2015 2
    Collection of Reports on Situation with Human Rights in the Russian Federation in 2015 2 Contents Article20 3 page Freedom of assembly and freedom of associations January-June 2015 in figures Golos 7 page Final ‘Golos’ Statement on Citizen Observation of Elections held on Single Voting Day, September 13, 2015 15 page Analytical Report Memorial 33 page Politically-motivated criminal prosecutions and political pris- oners in the Russian Federation. September 2015 41 page List of people recognised as political prisoners by the Memorial Human Rights Centre on September 15, 2015 SOVA 57 page Brief Review of Xenophobia, Freedom of Religion and Inappropriate Use of Anti-Extremist Legislation in Russia from January 2014 to August 2015 The Public Verdict Foundation 73 page Crackdown on civil society in Russia Collection of Reports on Situation with Human Rights in the Russian Federation in 2015 3 Article20 E-mail: [email protected] News and publications: http://www.article20.org/ Freedom of assembly and freedom of associations January-June 2015 in figures Freedom of assembly for the first half of 2015 The right to peaceful demonstrations is violated in 2015. Thus, the number of days of administrative arrests for actions (including agreed actions, one-man pickets, performances) is not less than 368 days. As well as 2 months of house arrest for “repeated violations” of the legislation on public meetings. So in Galperin’s case “previous violations” in February, March and June 2014 were counted – before the article about the repeated violations started to act. In addition, Ionov and Galperin are accused, among other things, in holding pickets, which, in accordance with Russian law, do not require concordance, what means that there can be no question of a violation of the rules of concordance.
    [Show full text]
  • New Opportunities for the Development of the Tourism Industry in Russian Municipalities
    NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE TOURISM INDUSTRY IN RUSSIAN MUNICIPALITIES AUTHORSHIP INTRODUCTION Elena Viktorovna Frolova The development of the tourism industry in Faculty of Management, Russian State Social University, Moscow, Russia. modern conditions is one of the priority directions of state policy. Both regional and ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8958-4561 E-mail: [email protected] local authorities focus on it. Modern tourism, being an accelerator for economic Elena Evgenevna Kabanova development, increases employment level, Faculty of Management, Russian State Social University, Moscow, Russia. upgrades infrastructure, reinforces small and ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9983-8158 medium-sized businesses, and improves E-mail: [email protected] foreign exchange earnings (SRIHADI et al., Ekaterina Aleksandrovna Vetrova 2016, p. 32). In 2017, tourism became the Faculty of Management, Russian State Social University, Moscow, Russia. fastest growing economic sector all over the world; the growth rates of the tourism industry ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7793-1888 E-mail: [email protected] were higher than the rates of the industrial Olga Vladimirovna Rogach sector (4.2%), the distributive trade sector (3.4%), the agricultural, forestry, and fishery Faculty of Management, Russian State Social University, Moscow, Russia. sector (2.6%) (WORLD TRAVEL AND TOURISM COUNCIL, 2017). Tourism contributes to the ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3031-4575 E-mail: [email protected] development of other sectors of the national Received in: Approved in: economy and, therefore, launches a multiplier 2021-03-10 2021-06-10 DOI:https://doi.org/10.24115/S2446-622020217Extra-D1087p.208-217 effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection of Reports on Situation with Human Rights in the Russian Federation in 2015 2
    Collection of Reports on Situation with Human Rights in the Russian Federation in 2015 2 Contents Article20 3 page Freedom of assembly and freedom of associations January-June 2015 in figures Golos 7 page Final ‘Golos’ Statement on Citizen Observation of Elections held on Single Voting Day, September 13, 2015 15 page Analytical Report Memorial 33 page Politically-motivated criminal prosecutions and political pris- oners in the Russian Federation. September 2015 41 page List of people recognised as political prisoners by the Memorial Human Rights Centre on September 15, 2015 SOVA 57 page Brief Review of Xenophobia, Freedom of Religion and Inappropriate Use of Anti-Extremist Legislation in Russia from January 2014 to August 2015 The Public Verdict Foundation 73 page Crackdown on civil society in Russia Collection of Reports on Situation with Human Rights in the Russian Federation in 2015 3 Article20 E-mail: [email protected] News and publications: http://www.article20.org/ Freedom of assembly and freedom of associations January-June 2015 in figures Freedom of assembly for the first half of 2015 The right to peaceful demonstrations is violated in 2015. Thus, the number of days of administrative arrests for actions (including agreed actions, one-man pickets, performances) is not less than 368 days. As well as 2 months of house arrest for “repeated violations” of the legislation on public meetings. So in Galperin’s case “previous violations” in February, March and June 2014 were counted – before the article about the repeated violations started to act. In addition, Ionov and Galperin are accused, among other things, in holding pickets, which, in accordance with Russian law, do not require concordance, what means that there can be no question of a violation of the rules of concordance.
    [Show full text]
  • Organizational Design of Welfare
    Central European University Department of Political Science ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN OF WELFARE-ENHANCING PUBLIC BUREAUCRACY: A Comparative Analysis of Russia’s Regions by Marina Nistotskaya Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervisor: Tamás Meszerics Committee: Gary J. Miller, Washington University in St. Louis (USA) Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling, University of Nottingham (UK) CEU eTD Collection Levente Littvay, Central European University (Hungary) Budapest 2009 I hereby declare that this work contains no materials accepted for any other degrees in any other institutions. This thesis contains no materials previously written and/or published by another person, unless otherwise noted. CEU eTD Collection ii Abstract The question ‘What type of bureaucracy is most likely to enable sustainable prosperity for all members of a society?’ is a classical puzzle in the field of political science. This thesis investigates this research question both theoretically and empirically. It draws on Gary Miller’s (2000) theory of interactive social production, which advocates the welfare- enhancing properties of a de-politicized bureaucracy (or civil service), and develops it further by showing the capacity of individual elements of civil service to contain politicians’ moral hazard. This theoretical argument is then investigated within the empirical milieu of regional governance of post-Soviet Russia. Having revisited Meyer-Sahling’s analytical framework of formal political discretion (2003, 2006), the thesis employs the improved framework to systematically assess the provisions of Russia’s two major Civil Service Acts of 1995 and 2004. This analysis shows that, from a legalistic point of view, Russia’s personnel policy regime can be characterized as largely de-politicized.
    [Show full text]
  • ЖУРНАЛ Vestnik.Is Vestnik.Is Ww W
    2019 ISSN 2221-1616 (online) Том 10. № 3 2019.№ 1Vol., декабрь 10. No. 3 2010 DOI: 10.19181/vis.2019.30.3 VESTNIK INSTITUTA SOTZIOLOGII as.ru as.ru СЕТЕВОЙ r r ЖУРНАЛ vestnik.is vestnik.is w. w. www.vestnik.isras.ru www.vestnik-isras.ru ww ww Тема Тема номера: номера: СетевизацияСоциальная общества: политика социально-политическийроссийского государства ракурс // Социальные неравенства / Вектор ориентации на себя /и/ Мифы своё окружение и реалии социальной политики / Интеграция сообществ: /воспитание/ Возможна ли чувства модернизация близости и связей всоциальной сетевом обществе политики // Социальная политика / Самоидентификация в странах Запада и критерии идентичности XXXX XXXX /молодёжных групп X- X- / О социальной политике в России SSN XXX SSN XXX SSN I I Вестник Института социологии Vestnik instituta sotziologii 3’2019 Рецензируемый научный журнал Издаётся с 2010 г. Выходит 4 раза в год 2019. Том 10. № 3 DOI: 10.19181/vis.2019.30.3 Учредитель: Федеральный научно-исследовательский социологический центр Российской академии наук Издатель: Федеральный научно-исследовательский социологический центр Российской академии наук Главный редактор: М. К. Горшков Заместители главного редактора: П. М. Козырева, И. А.Халий Ответственный секретарь: К. В. Подъячев Журнал включён в Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) на платформе Web of Science. Журнал включён в Российский индекс научного цитирования (РИНЦ). Журнал входит в Перечень ведущих рецензируемых научных журналов и изданий, в которых должны быть опубликованы основные научные результаты диссертаций на соискание учёных степеней кандидата и доктора наук. Журнал открытого доступа Доступ к контенту журнала бесплатный. Плата за публикацию с авторов не взимается. Контент доступен по лицензии Creative Common Attribution 4.0 Liceense Все выпуски журнала размещаются в открытом доступе на официальном сайте журнала с момента публикации: https://www.vestnik-isras.ru.
    [Show full text]
  • Third International Conference on Public Policy (ICPP3) June 28-30, 2017 – Singapore the Panel “Innovation, Governance and Reform: Lessons from the Developing World”
    Third International Conference on Public Policy (ICPP3) June 28-30, 2017 – Singapore The panel “Innovation, Governance and Reform: Lessons from the Developing World” Ensure citizen-oriented data for ‘co-production’ of public policy: Russian case of ‘budget for citizens’ Leonid Smorgunov St. Petersburg State University Universitetskaya nab., 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia 7 812 2747308 [email protected] DRAFT Abstract. The practice of citizens‟ involvement in the process of formation, monitoring and evaluation of performance of the public budget has become one of the most important forms of cooperation of citizens and government. Of particular importance is acquiring in a digital form of government where the public use of data creates a solid platform for the modern type of "co-production" of public budgets. The concept of „co-production‟ has become widely used in the study of public policy in general. Compared with the categories of "collaboration", "public involvement" this concept has expanded understanding of the cycle of public policies affecting the problem of political designs, governance of public policies, the joint formulation and implementation of public values. Modern budgeting based on cooperation transforms designs of budgetary policy, accountability systems, processes of identifying public values and others. Ensure citizen-oriented data relating to the budget gets particular importance and shared learning of citizens and government for inclusive budget process becomes main requisite for successful collaboration. There is the difference in using „co-production‟ between democratic and mixed political regimes with statist direction. Co-production is a new stance for democratic public policy, but in statist regimes with weak civil society co-production can be used more instrumentally for legitimizing political regimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia As a Country of Asylum Report on the Implementation of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees by the Russian Federation
    CIVIC ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE Russia as a Country of Asylum Report on the implementation of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees by the Russian Federation Moscow 2015 The report was prepared by the Civic Assistance Committee. On 20 April 2015 the Russian Federation Ministry of Justice registered the Civic Assistance Committee as an organisation fulfilling the function of a foreign agent. The report was published from the funds of the grant provided to the Civic Assistance Committee by the All-Russian Movement “Civil Dignity” under contract No 268/2014/1 of 1 August 2014 and in accordance with the Instruction of the Russian Federation President of 17 January 2014 11-rp. Authors: E. Yu. Burtina, E.Yu. Korosteleva, V.I. Simonov FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Clarification on terminology used CHAPTER 1. THE 1951 CONVENTION AND RUSSIAN LEGISLATION 1.1. 1951 Convention rules that are implemented in the Law On Refugees 1.2. Norms of 1951 Convention that correspond to Russian legislation 1.3. Convention norms that do not have an equivalent in Russian legislation 1.4. Correlation between the Convention and other provisions of the Law On Refugees 1.5. Positive provisions of the Law On Refugees, that do not have an equivalent in the 1951 Convention. CHAPTER 2. ACCESS TO ASYLUM PROCEDURE 2.1. Information for persons arriving in Russia seeking asylum. 2.2. Access to asylum procedure at the territorial bodies of the Russian FMS 2.3. Access to the asylum procedure from detention facilities 2.4. Access to the procedure of asylum application at a border checkpoint 2.5.
    [Show full text]