DOCSLIB.ORG

3. 1 VINDPLAATSEN VAN DE BRIEFTEKSTEN Overzicht Van

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

3. 1 VINDPLAATSEN VAN DE BRIEFTEKSTEN Overzicht van archieven en bibliotheken waar originelen of afschriften van brieven zijn aangetro¡en.Een asterisk duidt op een handschrift dat nog niet bekend was ten tijde van de uitgave van de brief in de Briefwisseling van Hugo Grotius I-XVII. AIX-EN-PROVENCE, Bibliothe© que Me¨ janes Aan Louise Barclay-Debonnaire GXVII) ms. 205 G1023) Aan Nicolas-Claude Fabry de Peiresc GIII*, IV*,V,VI,VIII) ms. 205 G1023) AIX-EN-PROVENCE, Muse¨ e Arbaud, Bibliothe© que Aan Nicolas-Claude Fabry de Peiresc GII*, XVII) cod. R 171 ALKMAAR, Regionaal Archief Van Joannes Foreest GX) Arch.Van Foreest, inv. no. 72 AMSTERDAM, Universiteitsbibliotheek ^Collectie Stedelijke Bibliotheek, Remonstrantse Kerk en schenking Diederichs Aan Joris de Bie GII*) III E 28 Aan Susanna Bloncke-van Reigersberch GII) R 20 Aan Simon Episcopius GI, II, IV) III E 1 Aan Simon Episcopius GII*) Gl 36a Aan Frederik Hendrik/Nicolaes van Reigersberch GII) H 4 Aan Frederik Hendrik/Nicolaes van Reigersberch GIV) H 13 Aan Frederik Hendrik GII,V) R 18 Aan Dirck Graswinckel GX) R 17 Aan Jan de Groot GII) 30 A 1 Aan Jan de Groot GII*) Ge 6 AanWillem de Groot GI,V) Q 1-2 AanWillem de Groot GVII,VIII) III E 1 AanWillem de Groot GII*) Gh 3 Aan Rombout Hogerbeets GII) N 107 Aan de Gecommitteerde Raden van Holland GI) III C 5 Aan de Staten van Holland GIV) R 19 b Aan Pieter Cornelisz. Hooft GI*, III*,V*) II C 15 Aan Israe« l Jasky GVII) 497 G 10 Geditie 1705: BG 1220) Aan Gottfried Jungermann GI*) Gt 9 Aan Franciscus Junius GII) S 19 Aan Maria Junius-Diamantius GII) G 58 Aan Maria Junius-Naeranus GV) I 82 Aan Nicolas-Claude Fabry de Peiresc GIV) R 22 Aan Pieter Christiaensz. Prins - Jan Fransz. deVries GV) III E 28 Aan Johanvan Reigersberch GIII) H 1 Aan Maria van Reigersberch GIV) A 50 a, b Aan Maria van Reigersberch GII) A 66 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GXVII) H 3 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GII) H 4-6 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GIII) H 6-13 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GIV) H 12-17 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GV) H 17-18 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GVI) H 18-19 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GXII) H 19-24 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GXIII) H 24-29 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GXIV) H 27 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GXIV) H 29-34 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GXV) H 34-38 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GXV) H 40 666 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GXVI) H 38-40 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GIV) L 94 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GVI) N 108 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GVI) R 1 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GVII) R 1-3 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GVIII) R 4-6 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GIX no. 3423) R 4 d Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GXVII) R 6 e Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GIX) R 7-9 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GX) R 10-12 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GXI) R 13-16 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GX no. 4433) R 16 h Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GII) III E 1 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GVIII, IX, XII, XV,XVI) 30 B 1-42 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GXII no. 5077) 30 B 42 Aan Nicolaes van Reigersberch GVIII*, IX* XII*, XVI) 30 F 1 Aan Claudius Salmasius GIV) Bc 23 Aan Claudius Salmasius GIV) Q 3 Aan Apollonius Schotte GI) III C 5 Aan Petrus Scriverius GIV*, XVII) Bl 141 Aan Petrus Scriverius GIV*, XVII) VIII C 4 Aan Petter Spiring Silvercrona GIX) R 8 Aan Joost van denVondel GV,IX, X, XI) XXX A 60 GIII H 1-4) Aan Joost van denVondel GIX) 30 A 2 Aan Gerardus Joannes Vossius GXVII) M 99 k Aan Gerardus Joannes Vossius GII*) Ck 70 Aan Gerardus Joannes Vossius GII*) Gl 36 Aan Gerardus Vossius jr. GX) B 44 Aan Isaac Vossius GX, XVI) III E 8 Aan Joachim de Wicquefort GXV) 30 A 3 Aan Johannes Wtenbogaert GIV) Ba 141 Aan Johannes Wtenbogaert GI,V) I 81 Aan Johannes Wtenbogaert GXV) Q 4 Aan Johannes Wtenbogaert GV) R 21 Aan Johannes Wtenbogaert GI) III E 1 Van Samuel Andreae GIX) 30 G Van Harald Appelboom GXIV) 30 H Van Caspar Barlaeus GXI) Bd 338 Van Caspar Barlaeus GIV) D 3 Van Caspar Barlaeus GIV) R 27 Van Caspar Barlaeus GI, IV) 30 K 1, 2 Van Dominicus Baudius GI) 30 L Van Rutgerus zum Bergen GIV) 30 M 1, 2 Van Petrus Bertius GI) I 64 Van Petrus Bertius GI) 30 N 1, 2 Van Hieronymus Bignon GIII*) III E 1 VanJohnBinghamGI) IIIE3 Van Johan Boreel GI) R 29 VanWillem Boreel GI) N 19 Van Joost Brasser GII) R 37 a, b Van Frans van Bree GI) III C 2 Van Louis Cappel GVI) 30 O VanMericusCasaubonusGVII) S6 Van Christian Cassius GX, XIII) 30 P 1, 2 Van Edward Herbert van Cherbury GIII) 30 W Van Robert le Comte GXIV) 30 Ad Van Johannes Arnoldi Corvinus GII) 30 Q 1, 2 Van Constantijn l'Empereur ab Oppijck GVIII) 30 Ae Van Simon Episcopius GII, IV) III E 1 VanSimonEpiscopiusGII) E42 Van Joachim Gersdor¡ GVII) R 30 Van Dirck Graswinckel GXIII) G 57 667 Van Dirck Graswinckel GV,X) 30 R 1, 2 VanJandeGrootGII) IIIC5 VanWillem de Groot GXIII) Q 13 a, b Van Jan ten Grootenhuys GI) 30 S Van Isaac Gruter GVI) 30 T Va n Ja c ob G r u t e r G I ) 3 0 U Van Jan Gruter GI) I 87 Va n Ja n G r u t e r G I ) 3 0 V Van Johan Hoeu¡t GXVII) A13 Van Adriaen Hogerbeets GXV) 30 X Van de Gecommitteerden Raden van Holland GA. Duyck) GI) III C 5 Van Hendrik Hooft GII) 11 M Van Pieter Cornelisz. Hooft GI, III,V) II C II Van Pieter Cornelisz. Hooft GI) 30 IJ Van Gerridt van der Hoolck GXVII) III C 3 Van Maximiliaan de Hornes GI) 30 Z Van Franc° ois van Houven GXVII) Gj 27 Van Franciscus Junius GII*) M 74 c Van Franciscus Junius GII) 30 Aa Van Justinus van Nassau GI) 30 Ai 1 Van Jacobus Lampadius GVII) 30 Ab Van Thomas Lansius GIII) 30 Ac Van Georg Michael Lingelsheim GI, II, IV) R 31 a-c Van Cornelis Matelief de Jonge GI) 30 Af 1, 2 Van Assuerus Matthisius GVI) 30 Ag Van Benjamin Aube¨ ry du Maurier GVII) I 63 Van Benjamin Aube¨ ry du Maurier GXVII) III E 28 Van Benjamin Aube¨ ry du Maurier GII, III) 30 I 1, 2 Van Louis Aube¨ ry du Maurier GXI, XII) R 28 Van Louis Aube¨ ry du Maurier GVIII) 30 J Van Louis Aube¨ ry du Maurier GVIII) 51 Cp Van Menasseh ben Israe« lGIX) IIIC4 Van Georg MÏller GX) R 32 a, b Van Georg MÏller GIX, X) 30 Ah 1-3 Van Abraham van der Myle GI, II, III) N 110-111a, b Van N.N. GXIII) H 25 c Van Johannes Narsius GIII) 30 E 2 VanWillem van Oldenbarnevelt-Stoutenburg GIII, IV,V) A4-5 VanWillem van Oldenbarnevelt-Stoutenburg GV) 30 Aj Van John Overall GI) III E 1 Van John Overall GI) 30 Ak Van Johannes Isacius Pontanus GI) H 88 Van Johannes Isacius Pontanus GI) 30 Al Van Erycius Puteanus GII) III E 1 Van Cornelis Pijnacker GI, XIV) 30 Am 1,2 Van Maria van Reigersberch GII, III, IV) A51 Van Maria van Reigersberch GII, III) N 109 Van Maria van Reigersberch GII) S 14 Van Maria van Reigersberch GII) I 95 Van Maria van Reigersberch GII) III C 5 Van Maria van Reigersberch GI*, II*) III E 28. 21 a, b Van Maria van Reigersberch GI*, II*, III*) XXV C 58 Van Maria van Reigersberch GI, III, XI) 30 An 1-3 Van Nicolaes van Reigersberch GIV) A51 j Van Nicolaes van Reigersberch GX) K 72-74 Goud: K 37a) Van Nicolaes van Reigersberch GXI) K 74-75 Van Nicolaes van Reigersberch GXII) K 75-77 Van Nicolaes van Reigersberch GXIII) K 77-78 Van Nicolaes van Reigersberch GXIV) K 78-79 Van Nicolaes van Reigersberch GII, III) M 1-2 Van Nicolaes van Reigersberch GXVII) M 1 b-e Van Nicolaes van Reigersberch GIV) M 2 668 Van Nicolaes van Reigersberch GV) M 3-4 Van Nicolaes van Reigersberch GVI) M 3-7 Van Nicolaes van Reigersberch GVII) M 7- 9 Van Nicolaes van Reigersberch GVIII) M 10-11 Van Nicolaes van Reigersberch GIX) M 12-13 Van Nicolaes van Reigersberch GX) M 14 Van Nicolaes van Reigersberch GIV) O 14 Van Nicolaes van Reigersberch GVIII, XII) 30 Ao 1-7 Van Nicolaes van Reigersberch GVIII*) 30 F 2 Van Adrianus Romanus GIII) 30 Ap Van Janus Rutgersius GI) 30 Aq 1-3 Van Frederik van den Sande GI) III E I Van Johan Skytte GVII) 30 Ar 1, 2 Van Jerzy Slupecki de Konary GIV) I 68 Van Petter Spiring Silvercrona GXVI) N 114 Van Jan Splinter GXVII) III C 3 Van Franciscus Sweertius GII) R 33 Van Franciscus Sweertius GII) 30 A3 Van Danie« lTilenusGV) IIIE1 Van Danie« lTilenusGV) 30At Van Henricus Vagetius GVI,VII) 30 Au 1, 2 VanGerardusJoannesVossiusGII,III,IV,V,IX,X,XI) IIIE1 Van Gerardus Joannes Vossius GX) S 8 Van Gerardus Joannes Vossius GVIII, IX, XIII, XIV) 30 Av 1-4 Van IsaacVossius GXVI) VI F 30 Van Gerard vanWassenaer GIII) 30 Ax Van Petrus WeymsiusGXVII) 34 Dv Van Pier Winsemius GI) 30 Aij Van JohanWitteGn) GV,VIII) As 133 Van JohanWitteGn) GV) 30 Az Van Olivier de Wree GIII) 30 Aw Van Christopher Wren GII) 30 Ba Van Johannes Wtenbogaert GXV) A64 e AMSTERDAM,Vrije Universiteit, Bibliotheek Aan Pierre Jeannin GI*) ms.
Recommended publications
  • 623-36-Gilman.Pdf (92.22Kb)

    623-36-Gilman.Pdf (92.22Kb)

    280 SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY NEWS conclusion to be paradoxical, it should be esteemed quite otherwise by specialists. Sophie van Romburgh. “For My Worthy Freind Mr Franciscus Junius”: An Edition of the Correspondence of Francis Junius F.F. (1591-1677). Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2004. x + 1134 pp. $317.00. Review by ERNEST B. GILMAN, NEW YORK UNIVERSITY. The indefatigable Dutch polymath whose letters are here col- lected was a jack of all scholarly trades and the master of them all. Medievalists are aware of Junius’s pioneering contributions to the study of Anglo-Saxon and Germanic philology. He was an expert in the comparative study of Old Norse, Old High German, Old Frisian, and Gothic as well as Old English. The codex in the Bodleian containing the Old English texts of Genesis A and B, Exodus, Daniel and “Christ and Satan,” still bears his name as “The Junius Manuscript.” For Renaissance art historians, The Paint- ing of the Ancients (published in Junius’s own Latin, English and Dutch versions over the period 1637-1641) represents the first comprehensive account of the visual arts in antiquity, and a cen- tral document in the history of ut pictura poesis. It stood as the standard work on the subject until the age of Winckelmann. This book was commissioned by Thomas Howard, 14th Earl of Arundel, in whose household Junius served as tutor and librarian for twenty years before the civil war. It was in this office that Junius supplied the scholarly expertise, and perhaps also his share of the enthusi- asm, behind the transnational antiquarian ventures of the “Collec- tor Earl.” Among the projects that occupied a long life devoted to scholarship was a posthumously published Catalogus, arranged al- phabetically, of all the references to objects of art (painting, sculp- ture, architecture, pottery and much else) that Junius could delve out of the archive of classical literature.
  • Holland and the Rise of Political Economy in Seventeenth-Century Europe

    Holland and the Rise of Political Economy in Seventeenth-Century Europe

    Journal of Interdisciplinary History, xl:2 (Autumn, 2009), 215–238. ACCOUNTING FOR GOVERNMENT Jacob Soll Accounting for Government: Holland and the Rise of Political Economy in Seventeenth-Century Europe The Dutch may ascribe their present grandeur to the virtue and frugality of their ancestors as they please, but what made that contemptible spot of the earth so considerable among the powers of Europe has been their political wisdom in postponing everything to merchandise and navigation [and] the unlimited liberty of conscience enjoyed among them. —Bernard de Mandeville, The Fable of the Bees (1714) In the Instructions for the Dauphin (1665), Louis XIV set out a train- ing course for his son. Whereas humanists and great ministers had cited the ancients, Louis cited none. Ever focused on the royal moi, he described how he overcame the troubles of the civil war of the Fronde, noble power, and ªscal problems. This was a modern handbook for a new kind of politics. Notably, Louis exhorted his son never to trust a prime minister, except in questions of ªnance, for which kings needed experts. Sounding like a Dutch stadtholder, Louis explained, “I took the precaution of assigning Colbert . with the title of Intendant, a man in whom I had the highest conªdence, because I knew that he was very dedicated, intelli- gent, and honest; and I have entrusted him then with keeping the register of funds that I have described to you.”1 Jean-Baptiste-Colbert (1619–1683), who had a merchant background, wrote the sections of the Instructions that pertained to ªnance. He advised the young prince to master ªnance through the handling of account books and the “disposition of registers” Jacob Soll is Associate Professor of History, Rutgers University, Camden.
  • Franciscus Junius: Philology and the Survival of Antiquity in the Art of Northern Europe

    Franciscus Junius: Philology and the Survival of Antiquity in the Art of Northern Europe

    Franciscus Junius: Philology and the survival of Antiquity in the art of northern Europe Review of: Art and Antiquity in the Netherlands and Britain. The Vernacular Arcadia of Franciscus Junius (1591 - 1677) by Thijs Weststeijn, Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2015, 452 pp., 178 colour & b/w illus. €129,00/ $164.00, ISBN13: 9789004283619, E-ISBN: 9789004283992 Ann Jensen Adams The early modern Dutch claimed as their forbearers the Batavians, a Germanic tribe described by Tacitus as located in the far reaches of the Roman Empire. Writings about art produced by the seventeenth-century descendants of these provincial peoples were proud but defensive as they continued to treat Rome as the centre of civilization. In 1632 Constantijn Huygens, secretary to northern Netherlands stadtholder Prince Frederik Henry, confided to his diary that he wished the promising artists Rembrandt van Rijn and Jan Lievens had travelled to Italy to learn from the art of antiquity and the Renaissance masters who had absorbed its lessons. But, he noted, the two young men felt that there were plenty of Italian works to be seen conveniently enough in The Netherlands. He then lavished praise on a figure of Judas by Rembrandt that he felt powerfully expressed the kind of universal truths promulgated by Latin art. Indeed, he wrote, ‘[... ] all honor to you, Rembrandt! To have brought Ilium – even all of Asia Minor – to Italy was a lesser feat than for a Dutchman [...] to have captured for The Netherlands the trophy of artistic excellence from Greece and Italy.’1 Through the first three quarters of the twentieth century this ambivalent stance toward the art of northern Europe has run like a red thread through art history as it developed as a professional discipline identified with, and defined by, the Italian Renaissance’s revival of antiquity.
  • Aspects of Arminian Soteriology in Methodist-Lutheran Ecumenical Dialogues in 20Th and 21St Century

    Aspects of Arminian Soteriology in Methodist-Lutheran Ecumenical Dialogues in 20Th and 21St Century

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto ASPECTS OF ARMINIAN SOTERIOLOGY IN METHODIST-LUTHERAN ECUMENICAL DIALOGUES IN 20TH AND 21ST CENTURY Mikko Satama Master’s Thesis University of Helsinki Faculty of Theology Department of Systematic Theology Ecumenical Studies 18th January 2009 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO − HELSINGFORS UNIVERSITET Tiedekunta/Osasto − Fakultet/Sektion Laitos − Institution Teologinen tiedekunta Systemaattisen teologian laitos Tekijä − Författare Mikko Satama Työn nimi − Arbetets title Aspects of Arminian Soteriology in Methodist-Lutheran Ecumenical Dialogues in 20th and 21st Century Oppiaine − Läroämne Ekumeniikka Työn laji − Arbetets art Aika − Datum Sivumäärä − Sidoantal Pro Gradu -tutkielma 18.1.2009 94 Tiivistelmä − Referat The aim of this thesis is to analyse the key ecumenical dialogues between Methodists and Lutherans from the perspective of Arminian soteriology and Methodist theology in general. The primary research question is defined as: “To what extent do the dialogues under analysis relate to Arminian soteriology?” By seeking an answer to this question, new knowledge is sought on the current soteriological position of the Methodist-Lutheran dialogues, the contemporary Methodist theology and the commonalities between the Lutheran and Arminian understanding of soteriology. This way the soteriological picture of the Methodist-Lutheran discussions is clarified. The dialogues under analysis were selected on the basis of versatility. Firstly, the sole world organisation level dialogue was chosen: The Church – Community of Grace. Additionally, the document World Methodist Council and the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification is analysed as a supporting document. Secondly, a document concerning the discussions between two main-line churches in the United States of America was selected: Confessing Our Faith Together.
  • University of Groningen Developments in Structuring Of

    University of Groningen Developments in Structuring Of

    University of Groningen Developments in Structuring of Reformed Theology van den Belt, Hendrik Published in: Reformation und Rationalität IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Final author's version (accepted by publisher, after peer review) Publication date: 2015 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): van den Belt, H. (2015). Developments in Structuring of Reformed Theology: The Synopsis Purioris Theologiae (1625) as Example. In H. J. Selderhuis, & E-J. Waschke (Eds.), Reformation und Rationalität (pp. 289-311). (Refo500 Academic Studies; Vol. 17). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 11-02-2018 1 Henk van den Belt 2 3 4 Developments in Structuring of Reformed Theology: 5 6 The Synopsis Purioris Theologiae (1625) as Example. 7 8 9 10 11 12 Abstract 13 14 The Synopsis Purioris Theologiae (1625), an influential handbook of Reformed 15 dogmatics, began as a cycle of disputations.
  • Paolo Sarpi E Hugo Grotius: Un Dialogo Mancato?

    Paolo Sarpi E Hugo Grotius: Un Dialogo Mancato?

    2019 Isonomia – Storica Rivista online di Filosofia Università degli Studi di Urbino Carlo Bo Paolo Sarpi e Hugo Grotius: un dialogo mancato? Alcune osservazioni su sovranità, jus circa sacra e fundamentalia fidei * Gregorio Baldin Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia [email protected] Abstract Hugo Grotius’ correspondence names frequently Paolo Sarpi. Grotius knew some of Sarpi’s texts, but his discovery of the Venetian friar dates back to the late 1620s, when he had already written his most important philosophico- political works. Nevertheless, some of Grotius’ texts, in particular the De Imperio Summarum Potestarum circa Sacra (written between 1614 and 1617), show significant analogies with Sarpi’s ideas. To understand these analogies, it is necessary to glance at the political and cultural milieu of the early 17 th -century Europe, when important political and religious events happened. The political and religious scenarios of the Republic of Venice and the United Provinces let us understand the reasons for some of the similarities between the writings of Sarpi and that of Grotius, but they also explain the reasons of their different orientations about the Synod of Dordrecht. However, Grotius and Sarpi evidently agree on some important topics, like irenicism, and the opposition to dogmatic disputes, but they especially share a particular concept of sovereignty, and of the jus circa sacra which must pertain to sovereign authority. Keywords : Hugo Grotius, Paolo Sarpi, sovereignty. * This article is part of a project that has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (GA n. 725883 EarlyModernCosmology). Gregorio Baldin “Paolo Sarpi e Hugo Grotius: un dialogo mancato? Alcune osservazioni su sovranità, jus circa sacra e fundamentalia fidei ” © 2019 Isonomia, Rivista online di Filosofia – Storica – ISSN 2037-4348 Università degli Studi di Urbino Carlo Bo http://isonomia.uniurb.it/storica 2 GREGORIO BALDIN 1.
  • PDF (Nellen, Petronella Moens Over Hugo De Groot)

    PDF (Nellen, Petronella Moens Over Hugo De Groot)

    MOENSIANA nummer 10 september 2013 Petronella Moens en haar vaderlandse helden een uitgave van Moensiana Nr 10 - september 2013 Petronella Moens en haar vaderlandse helden. Van de redactie Moensiana, de jaarlijkse nieuwsbrief van de Stichting Petronella Moens, De Vriendin van ‘t Vaderland beleeft in 2013 zijn tiende jaargang. Met deze aflevering van Moensiana, gevuld met een viertal artikelen rond het thema ‘Petronella Moens en haar vaderlandse helden’, willen wij het tweede lustrum kleur geven. Behalve de nieuwsberichten over Petronella Moens en het aan haar gewijde onderzoek, die u kunt terugvinden in de rubriek Varia aan het einde van deze nieuwsbrief, brengen wij een aantal artikelen waarin het gaat om de visie op helden als Hugo de Groot en de gebroeders De Witt, zoals Petronella Moens en haar goede vriend Adriaan Loosjes die in poëzie en proza verwoordden. Het herdenkingsjaar 1813 vormt een gerede aanleiding om de positie van Petronella Moens in dat jaar en in de woelige decennia daarvoor nader te bepalen. Waar stond Petronella in 1813 en hoe heeft zij in haar publicaties gereageerd op de jaren van revolutie en contra-revolutie? Die laatste vragen komen aan de orde in de bijdrage van Ans Veltman. Zij laat zien hoe Petronella Moens in de jaren van de Bataafse Omwenteling haar plaats trachtte te vinden. Henk Nellen, kenner van Hugo de Groot bij uitstek, laat zijn licht schijnen over het boek Hugo de Groot in zeven zangen (1790) van Petronella Moens. Over De Gebroeders De Witten (1791) van Moens gaat de bijdrage van Peter Altena. Ook Adriaan Loosjes, tijdgenoot en vriend van Petronella Moens, schreef over de zo beestachtig vermoorde broers, in zijn roman Johan de Witt, raadpensionaris van Holland (1805) en in een treurspel uit 1807.
  • Calvinism and the Arts: a Re-Assessment

    Calvinism and the Arts: a Re-Assessment

    Durham E-Theses Calvinism and the arts: A re-assessment Joby, Christopher Richard How to cite: Joby, Christopher Richard (2005) Calvinism and the arts: A re-assessment, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/2873/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Abstract Calvinism and the arts: A re-assessment Although many believe John Calvin had a negative attitude towards the arts, particularly visual art, my contention is that we find within his writings and the development of the Reformed tradition a more positive attitude to the arts than has hitherto been recognized. In chapters one and two, I look in detail at Calvin's own writings. I begin by examining exactly what type of visual art he rejected and what type he affirmed. I then look at how his eschatology and epistemology, particularly his use of the metaphor of mirror, allow us to argue for the placing of certain types of art within Reformed churches, notably history and landscape paintings.
  • Inaugural Lecture

    Inaugural Lecture

    WTJ 70 (2008): 1-18 INAUGURAL LECTURE RAGE, RAGE AGAINST THE DYING OF THE LIGHT CARL R. TRUEMAN I. Introduction Having been unable to find a suitable quotation from Bob Dylan as a title for my inaugural lecture, I have chosen instead a line from a famous poem by his partial namesake, Dylan Thomas. The whole stanza reads as follows: Do not go gentle into that good night, Old age should burn and rave at close of day; Rage, rage against the dying of the light. My reason for choosing as my opening shot Dylan Thomas’s rant against the passive resignation of old age in the face of death is simply this: today, both old age and church history are generally regarded as irrelevant. In a culture obses- sed with youth and driven by consumption, old age is something of an embar- rassment. It is an unproductive, unmarketable concept; and, in a church which so often apes the larger culture, church history is usually regarded as having little or nothing of use to say. My purpose, therefore, is to cast a critical eye on this assumption, and to indicate that Westminster Seminary church historians are not simply going to acquiesce in the consensus concerning their irrelevance, but that they fully intend to rage, rage against the dying of the historical light.1 A variety of factors contribute to the anti-historical thrust of the modern age, as I have argued elsewhere.2 Suffice it to say today, however, that I believe that in a society dominated by ideologies of novelty and innovation—ideologies driven by the agendas of science, capital, and consumerism—the past will always be cast in terms which put it at a disadvantage in relation to present and future.
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting

    University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting

    SMATHERS LIBRARIES’ LATIN AND GREEK RARE BOOKS COLLECTION UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2016 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS page LECTORI: TO THE READER ........................................................................................ 20 LATIN AUTHORS.......................................................................................................... 24 Ammianus ............................................................................................................... 24 Title: Rerum gestarum quae extant, libri XIV-XXXI. What exists of the Histories, books 14-31. ................................................................................. 24 Apuleius .................................................................................................................. 24 Title: Opera. Works. ......................................................................................... 24 Title: L. Apuleii Madaurensis Opera omnia quae exstant. All works of L. Apuleius of Madaurus which are extant. ....................................................... 25 See also PA6207 .A2 1825a ............................................................................ 26 Augustine ................................................................................................................ 26 Title: De Civitate Dei Libri XXII. 22 Books about the City of God. ..................... 26 Title: Commentarii in Omnes Divi Pauli Epistolas. Commentary on All the Letters of Saint Paul. ....................................................................................
  • Minimal Faith and Irenic Ideals in Seventeenth-Century Scholarly Circles Hugo Grotius As a Guardian of Isaac Casaubon’S Legacy*

    Minimal Faith and Irenic Ideals in Seventeenth-Century Scholarly Circles Hugo Grotius As a Guardian of Isaac Casaubon’S Legacy*

    Church History Church History and and Religious Culture 94 (2014) 444–478 Religious Culture brill.com/chrc Minimal Faith and Irenic Ideals in Seventeenth-Century Scholarly Circles Hugo Grotius as a Guardian of Isaac Casaubon’s Legacy* Henk Nellen Huygens Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands [email protected] Abstract This article shows how the Dutch humanist Hugo Grotius (1583–1645), inspired by his friend Isaac Casaubon, sought to introduce a procedure for mitigating strife in the Christian church. He proclaimed a division between a set of self-evident, universally accepted key tenets, to be endorsed by all believers, and a larger number of secondary, not completely certain articles of faith, which were to be left open for friendly debate. The doctrine of the Trinity belonged to the second category; it should be treated in a careful, detached way, in words that did not go beyond the terminology of the Bible. However, defenders of this irenic stance laid themselves open to severe criticism: the example of the conservative Lutheran theologian Abraham Calovius illustrates how they were censured for giving up divinely inspired truth for a chimerical unionist ideal which cajoled them into reintroducing the early Christian heresy of Arianism, now called Socinianism. Keywords minimal faith – secularisation – Socinianism – exegesis – seventeenth-century intellectual life – Grotius – Casaubon * Research for this article was conducted within the project ‘Biblical Criticism and Seculariza- tion in the Seventeenth Century’ (nwo, Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, 360–25–090). I am indebted to two anonymous reviewers for their remarks on an earlier ver- sion of this article.
  • Maiestas in the Dutch Republic

    Maiestas in the Dutch Republic

    Maiestas in the Dutch Republic The law of treason and the conceptualisation of state authority in the Dutch Republic from the Act of Abjuration to the expiration of the Twelve Years’ Truce (1581 – 1621) Wessel Willem Peter Damen 315792 Master Thesis Early Modern Intellectual History Erasmus University Rotterdam Supervisor: Em. Prof. Dr. L. Winkel Brussels, March 2017 Contents Part I – Introduction and Historiography 2 1. Introduction 3 2. State of the art & theory 5 Part II - Reconstructing the legal framework of treason 15 3. Roman law 17 4. The constitution of the Dutch Republic 23 5. Statutory law of treason 33 6. Summary of the reconstructed legal framework 43 Part III – Five cases of treason 45 7. Cornelis de Hooghe (1583) 47 8. Jacob Spensis (1601) 51 9. Johan van Oldenbarnevelt, Hugo de Groot, and Rombout Hogerbeets (1619) 54 10. Jacob Mom, Adriaen van Eynthouts, and Elbert van Botbergen (1621) 67 11. Reynhart van Tijtfort, Rempts ten Ham, and Jorjen Stuyver (1621) 73 12. Summary of the case studies 78 13. Conclusion 84 Bibliography 86 - 1 - Part I Introduction and Historiography Allegory depicting Atlas, Kronos and Historia. Title page to: N. Gueudeville, Le Nouveau Theatre du Monde (Leyden 1713). Print by François van Bleyswijck. Rijksmuseum RP-P-BI-1234. - 2 - Chapter 1: Introduction Waiting for the metro to arrive one summer night in Rotterdam, a line of graffiti sprayed on one of the walls of the tunnel caught my eye. “Question all Authority” – it read in giant red letters. Just below it, this time in black, there was a written response: “Why?”.