Government Coalitions in Democratic States: Conditions of Multiplication of the Results

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Government Coalitions in Democratic States: Conditions of Multiplication of the Results Institutul de Relaţii Internaţionale din Moldova RELAŢII INTERNAŢIONALE. Plus GOVERNMENT COALITIONS IN DEMOCRATIC STATES: CONDITIONS OF MULTIPLICATION OF THE RESULTS Valentina URSU, master student in political sciences, National Bank of Moldova ([email protected]) Abstract In this study the authors address an actual subject, in particular, in practical terms. Contemporary democratic states, characterized by pluripartidism and pluralism, in- cluding ideologically often face crises of the political and of the social relations system caused by the inability of the elected people to create coalitions of government. Different forms of democratic governance, different models of governing coalitions: majority, minority, pragmatic are analyzed. Based on the results of parliamentary elections in se- veral European countries, including: Germany, Italy, Republic of Moldova, the authors deduce the peculiarities of the majority, minority, pragmatic coalitions. In conclusion, the model of a pragmatic coalition, created on the basis of a common interest, of clear objectives for both parliamentary and extra-parliamentary political parties is descri- bed. Is relates the dialectic model of party interests, community interests and national- state interest. On the basis of dialectical unity, for a moment or a longer period, the par- liamentary parties, supported by an impressive number of voters, stand out from what distinguishes them, adopt a unanimously acceptable decision not to return to specifics and to work in the interest of the community and of the national-state. Keywords: governing coalition, majority government, minority government, prag- matism, interest, consensus CZU: 321.7:328.1(4+478) 242 Institutul de Relaţii Revistă ştiinţifico-practică Nr.1/2019 Internaţionale din Moldova Introduction. During 28 years since the proclamation of indepen- dence, the crisis of authority and credibility of the political institutions in the Republic of Moldova has caused many changes, including the loss of legitimacy. The consequences of instability and public disorder are negative and destructive for the country’s population. In the great sche- me of things, the political life in the Republic of Moldova, the critical situations in the European states, we consider it necessary to re-debate the topic of the coalition government, the conditions in which it can be efficient. Governance can be done by either a single political party or a coalition of parties. In the first case, the situation is clear: the party hol- ding the majority in Parliament forms the structures necessary to imple- ment its political, diplomatic, economic, social program. In the second case, there are difficulties that cause problems in the process of forming the majority coalition. The idea of ​​a minority coalition promoted by the electoral bloc ACUM produced several erroneous interpretations, but until the last moment the situation was evaluated, the candidates for the important functions were selected and verified, so that at the time of the establishment of the Moldovan Parliament structures, the appointment of the new Cabinet of Ministers, etc., the leaders of the majority, prag- matic governmemt responded with acceptable actions and statements. To the question: Why did the process of accepting the idea of ​​a minority coalition last? Our answer is: For the creation of a minority coalition, but especially for its good functioning, a high level of the political cul- ture of the ruling class, of the NGO leaders, of the popular masses is necessary. Taking into account the fact that in Moldova the politicians, the leaders of the political parties, even the leaders of the political state institutions intensively promoted the interests of their own parties, and the functions of: President, Prime Minister and President of Parliament were used to serve the interests of the group, the division of the society on the basis of the geostrategic developmental vector was appreciated as normality. While in the European Union, a community in which the Republic of Moldova aims to integrate, the concepts of social cohesion and subsidiarity were promoted, Moldovans imagined and multiplied information about enemies and friends. Although everyone recogni- zes that for the Republic of Moldova, as with other contemporary sta- tes, it is very important to collaborate with the neighbors and with all the developed countries in the world that the state of hostility and war 243 Institutul de Relaţii Internaţionale din Moldova RELAŢII INTERNAŢIONALE. Plus between the neighbors is unacceptable, yet the leaders of the Moldovan state’s political institutions have supported and created critical, unplea- sant situations in relations with Romania and Ukraine. We have a coalition of government, consisting of political forces, located at opposing poles in the political-ideological space of the Repu- blic of Moldova. We ask: Would this be a problem for its maintenance and success? We answer - No. The problem is in the willingness of the parties to strengthen their resources, efforts to serve the interests of the Republic of Moldova, to rehabilitate the image of politicians, officials in the perception of citizens, bearers of different conceptions about the world, actors of social relations. In the description of citizens, the poli- tician is not a hero, a master to follow, but a thief, a corrupt, an oligar- ch, an irresponsible person, a careerist, a demagogue, a coward. Only vices, when did we lose our virtue? We believe that 2019 has given us a chance to change the political, the economic and social situation for the better, to return people’s trust to politicians, mayors, public servants. Let’s ask: What can we do to change the political and social situation in the Republic of Moldova? In our capacity as researchers and teachers, we have proposed to publish a study dedicated to coalition government, addressed not to scholars, not even to political analysts, but to society, in order to decipher the phenomenon: of the coalition government, to explain the mechanism of training and to characterize the conditions of their efficient operation. We consider it necessary to return to the politi- cal education of the citizens: a mass of people does not transform itself into an organized society, the change of mentality of the citizen takes place through training, education - priority objectives of the socializati- on process. The citizen must be trained to be prepared to make a rational choice, take an assumed decision. The more that after the return of the opposition representatives to the plenary sittings of the Parliament of the Republic of Moldova, we have enough factual material that reflects their behavior: mimic activity, clowning around, demagogic discourse, criticism for the sake of criticism, etc., which in fact only produce hin- drances in the good functioning of state institutions. The citizen should be informed in a timely and appropriate manner about such situations, they form the perception, based on which the deputy will be assessed. Coalition governance is a constant theme on the agenda of European researchers. The analysis of the experience gained by coalition govern- 244 Institutul de Relaţii Revistă ştiinţifico-practică Nr.1/2019 Internaţionale din Moldova ments is an important objective of political research. Representing a com- plex phenomenon, coalition government can only be investigated under the conditions of applying the principles of methodological pluralism. It is important to note that the social environment includes a set of factors, relationships, conditions, institutions, social groups and ideologies inside and under the influence of which the individual and social groups are formed. It is important to understand that a coalition is a union of poli- tical parties designed to achieve common goals. Coalitions are needed to build stable and effective governance, based on the co-ordination of responsible forces capable of reaching a compromise in serving the na- tional interest. The rationale for setting up the coalition is determined by the expectations of the majority of citizens, by the urgent need to impro- ve governance mechanisms, as well as by the critical assessments made on past political experiences, the domestic and external situation of the country, the positions taken at this stage by the political actors involved. Applied methods. The systemic analysis of coalition government, the conditions for enhancing its effectiveness, is resolute if we apply the laws and principles of dialectics, synergistic. The more that a majo- rity or minority coalition government can achieve maximum efficiency, based only on the principles of pragmatism, a philosophical current in America in the 60s of the 20th century, the founders of which proposed to evaluate the results of human activity, including political activity. Empirical methods applied by pragmatism have a huge cognitive po- tential and can lead to a change in the mentality of both researchers and practitioners. The dialectics of individual, group and community inte- rests can unite or divide, perhaps bring the social / political actors closer to a useful action. Representatives of pragmatism claim that social-poli- tical action is all the more valuable, as it satisfies the interests of a larger number of people or a greater number of needs in a smaller number of people. This clarification allows us to answer all representatives of the education and training system to all teachers who complain that their work, which asks for self-giving,
Recommended publications
  • Italian Politics in an Era of Recession : the End of Bipolarism? Bull, MJ and Pasquino, G
    Italian politics in an era of recession : the end of bipolarism? Bull, MJ and Pasquino, G http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2018.1436493 Title Italian politics in an era of recession : the end of bipolarism? Authors Bull, MJ and Pasquino, G Type Article URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/46758/ Published Date 2018 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. Italian Politics in an Era of Recession: the end of Bipolarism? Martin Bull and Gianfranco Pasquino Italian politics have undergone momentous change in the 2007-2017 decade under the impact of the eurozone crisis, whose peak in 2011-2013 could be equated to the earlier watershed years of 1992-1994. The lasting impact of the upheaval in Italian politics in the early 1990s could still be felt in the decade of economic recession, but there were also new challenges prompted by a crisis that had its roots in international financial contagion and unravelling under the shadow of both recession and austerity. The changes were of an economic, social, cultural, institutional, policy-oriented and political nature. If one central quintessentially political theme stands out by the end of this decade it is the apparent exhaustion of the quest for bipolarisation that was initiated in the early 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • Italy Election : How Populist Five Star Movement Is Wrecking Government Hopes for the Mainstream Bull, MJ
    Italy election : how populist Five Star Movement is wrecking government hopes for the mainstream Bull, MJ Title Italy election : how populist Five Star Movement is wrecking government hopes for the mainstream Authors Bull, MJ Type Article URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/46772/ Published Date 2018 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. 12/5/2019 Italy election: how populist Five Star Movement is wrecking government hopes for the mainstream Academic rigour, journalistic flair Di Meo/EPA Italy election: how populist Five Star Movement is wrecking government hopes for the mainstream February 23, 2018 1.28pm GMT Italy faces an election on March 4 – and, after a long decade of austerity and Author economic difficulties, a strong possibility of further political paralysis. Neither the centre-left, the centre-right, or the populists are likely to command a majority in parliament. Establishing a functioning government won’t be easy, and its make-up will depend on which parties are prepared to put aside their differences and form an Martin J. Bull alliance. Professor of Politics, University of Salford The populist Five Star Movement (M5S) exploded onto the electoral scene in the 2013 general election, arresting the see-saw alternation between centre-left and centre-right majority governments that had been tentatively established in the 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • Atti Parlamentari —I— Camera Dei Deputati
    Atti Parlamentari —I— Camera dei Deputati XVII LEGISLATURA — DISCUSSIONI — SEDUTA DEL 12 OTTOBRE 2016 RESOCONTO STENOGRAFICO 691. SEDUTA DI MERCOLEDÌ 12 OTTOBRE 2016 PRESIDENZA DELLA PRESIDENTE LAURA BOLDRINI INDI DEL VICEPRESIDENTE LUIGI DI MAIO INDICE RESOCONTO STENOGRAFICO .................... 1-101 PAG. PAG. Missioni ............................................................ 1 Renzi Matteo, Presidente del Consiglio dei ministri .......................................................... 1 Presidente ..................................................... 1 (Discussione) ..................................................... 6 Comunicazioni del Presidente del Consiglio dei ministri in vista del Consiglio europeo Presidente ..................................................... 6 del 20 e 21 ottobre 2016 ........................... 1 Artini Massimo (Misto-AL-P) ..................... 18 Presidente ..................................................... 1 Berlinghieri Marina (PD) ........................... 18 (Intervento del Presidente del Consiglio dei Brescia Giuseppe (M5S) ............................. 8 ministri) ......................................................... 1 Brunetta Renato (FI-PdL) .......................... 12 Presidente ..................................................... 1 Dellai Lorenzo (DeS-CD) ............................ 13 N. B. Il RESOCONTO SOMMARIO è disponibile on line già nel corso della seduta, alla pagina “Resoconti” del sito della Camera dei deputati. Il Resoconto Sommario è corredato di collegamenti ipertestuali
    [Show full text]
  • The Italian Republic
    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 4 March 2018 OSCE/ODIHR NEEDS ASSESSMENT MISSION REPORT 11-13 December 2017 Warsaw 1 February 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 3 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 3 III. FINDINGS ....................................................................................................................................... 5 A. BACKGROUND AND POLITICAL CONTEXT .................................................................................. 5 B. LEGAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................................. 5 C. ELECTORAL SYSTEM .................................................................................................................. 6 D. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION ...................................................................................................... 7 E. VOTER REGISTRATION................................................................................................................ 8 F. CANDIDATE REGISTRATION ....................................................................................................... 9 G. ELECTION CAMPAIGN ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Italia Viva È Un Partito Che Nasce in Un Quadro Politico Privo Di Riferimenti Certi
    Dipartimento di Governo e Politiche Linguaggi della politica e dei nuovi media Relatore: Candidata: Prof. Paolo Peverini Giorgia Spitoni Correlatore: Prof. Massimiliano Panarari Matricola 637002 Anno accademico 2019-2020 Alla LUISS, che mi ha messa a dura prova Alla mia famiglia, che mi ha aiutata a superarla Alle mie amiche, che hanno colorato questo biennio Ad Alessandro, cui devo 110 torte di mele A Nanni, porto sicuro in un mare in tempesta A mamma, lei sa perché A me, che sono arrivata in fondo “La mossa del cavallo produce sorpresa, perché sfugge gli affrontamenti lineari delle torri e degli alfieri, cambia il terreno dello scontro e talvolta ribalta i rapporti tra le forze: il cavallo sembra più debole perché copre meno caselle degli altri pezzi, ma è affascinante perché spiazza il gioco, sposta il campo d’azione, sviluppa un’influenza su molte caselle in modo indiretto” Sommario Introduzione ............................................................................................................................... 1 CAPITOLO 1 – L’antefatto ....................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Provenienza ...................................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Leadership ...................................................................................................................... 21 1.3 Nascita ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Estratti Dalla Stampa Locale 10
    IL MESSAGGERO VENETO 10 MAGGIO 2017 Profughi, a Gradisca il centro-espulsioni MIGRANTI di Mattia Pertoldi UDINE Tutto come previsto: il ministro dell'Interno ha scelto l'ex Cie di Gradisca d'Isonzo come sede in cui realizzare in Fvg, entro luglio, il nuovo Centro permanente per i rimpatri (Cpr), come previsto dalla legge Minniti approvata alcune settimane fa in Parlamento. Un Centro che, come previsto dalla normativa, non ospiterà più di 100 ex profughi - cui è stata respinta la richiesta d'asilo - in attesa di essere rimpatriati nei loro Paesi d'origine.Una scelta certamente non inaspettata e perfettamente logica considerato come nella cittadina isontina ci siano già a disposizione strutture idonee - quelle del Cara attualmente funzionamente e dell'ex Cie -, senza che il ministero debba quindi spendere milioni di euro in opere di ammodernamento di altri immobili. Come specificato più volte dal ministro dell'interno Marco Minniti, poi, Gradisca risponde all'esigenza di creare i nuovi Cpr nelle vicinanze degli aeroporti da cui lasceranno l'Italia gli ex richiedenti asilo. Era difficile, dunque, aspettarsi una scelta diversa da Roma - che lunedì ha comunicato agli enti locali la localizzazione dei primi 11 Cpr sui 18 totali da realizzare lungo la Penisola -, ma la Regione pare non voler accettare senza discussioni la decisione del Viminale e fissa le sue regole per il via libera a Gradisca d'Isonzo. Lo fa per bocca della presidente Debora Serracchiani che certamente non sbatte le porte in faccia al ministro - anzi -, ma chiede che siano rispettate alcune condizioni imprescindibili. La prima è quella della contestuale chiusura del Cara esistente e che - dati della Regione al 2 maggio - attualmente ospita 503 migranti.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Party Electoral Strategy: Rival Theories Tested on the 2018 Italian General Election
    Department of Politics, Philosophy and Economics Chair of Political Science Building Party Electoral Strategy: Rival Theories Tested on the 2018 Italian General Election PROF. LORENZO DE SIO GLAUCO GRESTINI (ID: 081362) SUPERVISOR CANDIDATE Academic Year 2018/201 "Devi fare ciò che ti fa stare bene" Alla LUISS Guido Carli, per avermi dato i migliori anni. Alla mia famiglia, per avermi sempre supportato. A BIP, per avermi sempre sopportato. Table of Contents Introduction.......................................................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1: The context around the March 4th elections ..............................................................................4 The Rosatellum: the umpteenth Italian electoral law .................................................................................................... 5 The new Democratic Party ............................................................................................................................................ 6 The institutionalized Five Stars Movement ................................................................................................................... 7 The nationalized Lega.................................................................................................................................................. 10 Electoral volatility in 2018 .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • To the Italian State Property Office in Person of Their
    To the Italian State Property Office !in person of their representatives pro tempore: 1. of the Central Directorate of the immovable Immobile Properties of the State, Paolo Maranca [email protected] 2. della Direzione Regionale per il Friuli Venezia Giulia Pierluigi Di Blasio ! dre_FriuliVeneziaGiulia@pce. agenziademanio.it. To the Port Authority of Trieste in person of the Commissar pro tempore, Zeno D'Agostino [email protected] To the Municipality of Trieste in person of the Mayor pro tempore, Roberto Cosolini [email protected] To Regione Friuli Venezia Giulia in person of the President pro tempore, Debora Serracchiani [email protected] To the Director of Office 7 - maritime works of the interregional Office of Public Works, Giorgio Lillini [email protected] To the Commander of the Maritime Directorate of Trieste, Goffredo Bon [email protected] !and, as an official complaint: To the Commissar pro tempore of the Italian Government in Regione Friuli Venezia Giulia, as delegate of the powers of special trusteeship over the Free Territory of Trieste and its international Free Port Francesca Adelaide Garufi [email protected] To Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti del Governo italiano amministratore fiduciario speciale, in persona del Ministro pro tempore Graziano del Rio [email protected] To the Prosecutor of the Republic in Trieste, Carlo Mastelloni [email protected] To the
    [Show full text]
  • Camera Dei Deputati
    CAMERA DEI DEPUTATI XVII LEGISLATURA Resoconto stenografico dell'Assemblea Seduta n. 747 di giovedì 23 febbraio 2017 Seguito della discussione del disegno di legge: S. 2630 – Conversione in legge, con modificazioni, del decreto-legge 30 dicembre 2016, n. 244, recante proroga e definizione di termini. Proroga del termine per l'esercizio di deleghe legislative (Approvato dal Senato) (A.C. 4304). PRESIDENTE. L'ordine del giorno reca il seguito della discussione del disegno di legge, già approvato dal Senato, n. 4304: Conversione in legge, con modificazioni, del decreto-legge 30 dicembre 2016, n. 244, recante proroga e definizione di termini. Proroga del termine per l'esercizio di deleghe legislative. Ricordo che, nella seduta di ieri, è stata approvata la questione di fiducia posta dal Governo sull'approvazione, senza emendamenti ed articoli aggiuntivi, dell'articolo unico del disegno di legge di conversione del decreto-legge in esame nel testo delle Commissioni, identico a quello approvato dal Senato. Avverto che, consistendo il disegno di legge di un solo articolo, non si procederà alla votazione dell'articolo unico ma, dopo l'esame degli ordini del giorno, si procederà direttamente alla votazione finale, a norma dell'articolo 87, comma 5, del Regolamento. (Esame degli ordini del giorno – A.C. 4304) PRESIDENTE. Passiamo all'esame degli ordini del giorno presentati. Avverto che la Presidenza non ritiene ammissibile, ai sensi articolo 89, comma 1, del Regolamento, l'ordine del giorno n. 9/4304/4 Pastorino, volto a prevedere la modifica del regime di accesso ad incentivi per piccoli impianti idroelettrici, in quanto recante un contenuto del tutto estraneo rispetto alle materie oggetto del provvedimento in esame.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Populist Success in a Hung Parliament: the 2018 General
    Populist Success in a Hung Parliament: The 2018 general election in Italy1 Alessandro Chiaramonte, Vincenzo Emanuele, Nicola Maggini, Aldo Paparo Italy went to the polls on 4 March 2018 in a general election whose outcome was highly uncertain until the very last day of the campaign. The three main contenders were the centre-right coalition led by Berlusconi and Salvini, the centre-left coalition headed by Renzi, and the Movimento 5 Stelle (M5S, Five Star Movement) – a populist, anti-establishment party founded by comedian Beppe Grillo and now led by Luigi Di Maio. Uncertainty surrounded the election outcome not only due to the employment of a new, untested electoral system, but also as a result of the very high percentage of undecided voters and the competitiveness of the main political groupings. According to the polls, none of them would get the majority of seats in Parliament required to form a government outright. Thus the next government was expected to be formed on the basis of post-electoral bargaining among parties – perhaps even leading to a parliamentary majority cutting across coalitional borders – and would likely include the mainstream parties from both left and right camps, that is, the incumbent Partito Democratico (PD, Democratic Party) and Forza Italia (FI, Go Italy) respectively. Indeed, the election resulted in a hung parliament with no clear winner. The centre-right coalition came first, but was some way from claiming an absolute majority of seats. The M5S finished a close second behind the centre-right coalition, while the centre-left was left trailing behind. More surprisingly, however, both PD and FI sustained extremely heavy losses in terms of both votes and seats, leaving them no chance to form a government either by themselves or including the minor centrist parties.
    [Show full text]
  • LOS SISTEMAS DE PARTIDOS EN ITALIA: UNA EVOLUCIÓN INACABADA1 Party Systems in Italy: an On-Going Evolution
    LOS SISTEMAS DE PARTIDOS EN ITALIA: UNA EVOLUCIÓN INACABADA1 Party systems in Italy: An on-going evolution GIANFRANCO PASQUINO Johns Hopkins University [email protected] Cómo citar/Citation Pasquino, G. (2020). Los sistemas de partidos en Italia: una evolución inacabada. Revista de Estudios Políticos, 189, 19-39. doi: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.189.01 Resumen En la segunda posguerra Italia ha tenido tres sistemas de partidos. Siguiendo la lección de Sartori se impone «contar los partidos que cuentan». El primer sistema (1946-1992) fue definido como pluralismo polarizado debido a la presencia de dos partidos, el PCI y el MSI, diversamente antisistema. El segundo sistema (1994-2013) fue simplemente un sistema multipartidista, nunca estabilizado, caracterizado por un tipo de competición bipolar. Después de 2013 el sistema ha continuado siendo multi- partidista, pero la competición es multipolar. Levemente antisistema, el M5S se ha convertido en partido de gobierno, a la vez que todos los demás partidos existentes también continúan transformándose en un contexto marcado por la alta volatilidad electoral. Como resultado de este cuadro, no es posible afirmar que el sistema de partidos se haya consolidado. Al contrario, debe ser definido como no estructurado. Palabras clave Partidos; sistema de partidos; polarizacion; escisión; volatilidad; deconstruc- cion. 1 Texto traducido por Jorge del Palacio. 20 GIANFRANCO PASQUINO Abstract In the second post-war period, Italy has so far had three party systems. Following Sartori’s teachings, one must «count the parties that count». The first party system, 1946-1992, has to be defined polarized pluralism, including two differently anti- system parties, the PCI and the MSI.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/Print the Study in PDF Format
    GENERAL ELECTIONS IN ITALY 04th March 2018 European The right running favourite in the Elections monitor Italian parliamentary election on 4th 1) Analysis : page 01 to 08 2) Résults : page 09 to 11 March next. Corinne Deloy On 28th December last the President of the Italian Republic, Sergio Mattarella dissolved the parliament (Assembly and Senate) and convened parliamentary elections on 4th March next. According to the Constitution these must be organised within 40 to 70 days after the dissolution. Analysis Three camps face each other in these parliamentary elections. On the one side there is the right- wing, represented by Forza Italia (FI), the party of former President of the Council (1994-1995, 2001-2006 and 2008-2011) Silvio Berlusconi, the Northern League (LN) led by Matteo Salvini, and the Brothers of Italy (FdI) led by Giorgia Meloni; on the other there is the left-wing, whose main movement, the Democratic Party (PD) led by Matteo Renzi, to which the present head of government Paolo Gentiloni belongs. The third camp is the 5 Stars Movement (M5S) founded by Beppe Grillo, an undefinable populist party which is rejecting any coalition with the other parties and led at present by Luigi di Maio. According to the most recent poll by Tecne, published at the end of January, the M5S is due to come out ahead with 27.8% of the vote. It is forecast to beat the Democratic Party, which is due to win 22.2% of the vote, Forza Italia, 18.3%, the (Northern) League, 12.8% and the Brothers of Italy, 5.1%.
    [Show full text]