Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic World

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic World Plants and Empire Plants and Empire Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic World Londa Schiebinger Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England Copyright © 2004 by Londa Schiebinger All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America First Harvard University Press paperback edition, 2007 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Schiebinger, Londa L. Plants and empire : colonial bioprospecting in the Atlantic World / Londa Schiebinger. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ). ISBN-13 978-0-674-01487-9 (cloth: alk. paper) ISBN-10 0-674-01487-1 (cloth: alk. paper) ISBN-13 978-0-674-02568-4 (pbk.) ISBN-10 0-674-02568-7 (pbk.) 1. Pride-of-Barbados (Plant). 2. Herbal abortifacients—History. 3. Slavery—Caribbean Area—History. I. Title. RG137.45.S35 2004 581.6Ј34—dc22 2004047364 To the memory of the men and women whose knowledge of fertility control has been lost in the mists of time and to the ravages of history Contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction 1 “The Base for All Economics” 5 Plan of the Book 12 1 Voyaging Out 23 Botanistes Voyageurs 25 Maria Sibylla Merian 30 Biopirates 35 Who Owns Nature? 44 Voyaging Botanical Assistants 46 Creole Naturalists and Long-Term Residents 51 Armchair Botanists 57 The Search for the Amazons 62 Heroic Narratives 65 2 Bioprospecting 73 Drug Prospecting in the West Indies 75 Biocontact Zones 82 Secrets and Monopolies 90 Drug Prospecting at Home 93 Brokers of International Knowledge 100 3 Exotic Abortifacients 105 Merian’s Peacock Flower 107 Abortion in Europe 113 Abortion in the West Indies 128 Abortion and the Slave Trade 142 viii Contents 4 The Fate of the Peacock Flower in Europe 150 Animal Testing 153 Self-Experimentation 156 Human Subjects 159 Testing for Sexual Difference 166 The Complications of Race 171 Abortifacients 177 5 Linguistic Imperialism 194 Empire and Naming the Kingdoms of Nature 197 Naming Conundrums 206 Exceptions: Quassia and Cinchona 211 Alternative Naming Practices 219 Conclusion: Agnotology 226 Notes 243 Bibliography 286 Credits 298 Index 300 Acknowledgments This book was a pleasure to write. It took me to exotic places and brought me into contact with wonderful scholars from many parts of the globe. I thank Roy Vickery of the Natural History Museum, London, for kindly opening for me Hans Sloane’s herbarium (the first eight volumes contain Sloane’s plants from Jamaica). The staff of the Laboratoire de Phanérogamie, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, let me rum- mage through their many varieties of the Poinciana from specimen draw- ers stretching from ceiling to floor in room after room. I also thank John Symons at the Wellcome Library, London; the knowledgeable archivists and staff at the Bibliothèque Centrale Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris; the Centre des Archives d’Outre-Mer, Aix-en-Provence; and the National Library of Jamaica, Kingston, who helped with images and arcane materials. Numerous colleagues directed me at crucial mo- ments to valuable information. Jim McClellan generously shared his in- triguing archival find concerning “the potato with two roots”; in addition he read and helpfully commented on the manuscript. Sue Broomhall called Mme. Claude Gauvard’s work to my attention. Jerome Handler di- rected me to sources on midwifery in Barbados. Karen Reeds told me about Mark Jameson and his sixteenth-century garden of plants for gynecological complaints. Philip Boucher shared his expertise on various matters concerning Rochefort and du Tertre. Staffan Müller-Wille pointed me to Linnaeus’ evaluation of Dahlberg and kindly read Chapter 5. Roberta Bivins called Sir William Jones’s work to my attention. Claudia Swan shared information on the fascinating “root cutters.” Lee Ann Newsom helped with technical questions concerning the biogeographical origins of the Poinciana. Brian Ogilvie read and commented very helpfully on Chapter 5. Linda Woodbridge provided the lovely citation from Ben Jonson. Clem Hawes came to my aid when I required an expert on Daniel Defoe’s Moll Flanders. Sue Hanley read sections of Chapter 3 and an- ix x Acknowledgments swered questions about French law. Matthew Restall provided informa- tion on Tabachin and all things Spanish. Minnie Sinha provided careful comments on the theories and practices of imperialism. Alan Walker of- fered splendid insights into current scientific naming practices. Barbara Bush, Richard Drayton, Pamela Smith, and Emma Spary all provided much-needed advice and materials on the history of medicine, natural his- tory, or the West Indies. Finally, a special thanks to Paula Findlen for her generous support for my many projects. Much of this book was written during my year at the Max-Planck- Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte (1999–2000). Warm thanks to Lorraine Daston for her intellectual sparkle and kind hospitality. I also thank the Institute’s library staff for tracking down and photocopying nu- merous sources. Support for that year was provided by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. I was the first woman historian to win the Alexan- der von Humboldt Research Prize; I know there will be many to follow. Travel to archives and time for writing were also supported by the Na- tional Science Foundation and the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. I am also grateful for the generous support for my re- search provided by Dean Susan Welch and A. Gregg Roeber at Pennsylva- nia State University. A warm thanks to Elizabeth Knoll, my patient editor, who made the journey through press a pleasant one. My thanks, too, to my research assistants: Mary Faulkner, Sarah Goodfellow, and Katherine Maas—the book is better because of you. Finally, I owe a special debt of gratitude to Ed Dumond who kept all my equipment running. Sections of various chapters appeared in Endeavour; Hypatia; Caroline Jones and Peter Galison’s edited volume Picturing Science, Producing Art; Lorraine Daston and Fernando Vidal’s Moral Authority of Nature; Pamela Smith and Benjamin Schmidt’s Knowledge and Its Making; my own and Claudia Swan’s Colonial Botany. I thank these journals, editors, and presses for permission to reprint those materials. Finally, it takes a village to sustain intellectual vigor. The students in my graduate seminar, “Colonial Exchange,” pored over my manuscript and offered many wonderful corrections and suggestions—thanks to them all. My colleagues and friends—Rich Doyle, Laura Giannetti, Amy Greenberg, Gillian Hadfield, Ronnie Hsia, Mary Pickering, Guido Ruggiero, Sophie de Schaepdrijver, Susan Squier, and Nancy Tuana—all provided warmth, chatter, food, and sometimes even dance parties at cru- cial moments. To Robert Proctor, Geoffrey Schiebinger, and Jonathan Proctor, my love. Plants and Empire Introduction The Indians, who are not treated well by their Dutch masters, use the seeds [of this plant] to abort their children, so that their children will not become slaves like they are. The black slaves from Guinea and Angola have demanded to be well treated, threatening to refuse to have children. In fact, they sometimes take their own lives because they are treated so badly, and because they believe they will be born again, free and living in their own land. They told me this themselves. In this moving passage from her magnificent 1705 Metamorphosis insec- torum Surinamensium, Maria Sibylla Merian recorded how the African slave and Indian populations in Surinam, a Dutch colony, used the seeds of a plant she identified as the flos pavonis, literally “peacock flower,” as an abortifacient.1 This luxuriant plant still grows wild and in hedgerows and gardens throughout the Caribbean, and continues today to be known to many herb women and bush doctors as providing effective brews for in- ducing abortion. Unlike the prolific peacock flower, Merian’s work is rare and remark- able. A celebrated artist, the German-born Merian was one of very few European women to travel on her own in this period in pursuit of sci- ence. Women naturalists rarely figured in the rush to know exotic lands: Johanna Helena Herolt, Merian’s eldest daughter, collected and painted insects and plants, much like her mother, in Surinam in 1711 when her husband traveled there to look after his business interests. Jeanne Baret became the first woman to circumnavigate the globe in 1776, but she sailed, disguised as a male, as an assistant to Philibert Commerson, the ship’s botanist and the father of her illegitimate child. In the nineteenth century, women like Lady Charlotte Canning did sometimes collect bo- tanical specimens, but almost always as colonial wives, traveling where their husbands happened to take them and not in pursuit of their own sci- entific programs.2 Merian’s passage is also remarkable for what it reveals about the geopol- itics of plants in the so-called “early modern world.” Historians have 1 2 Plants and Empire [To view this image, refer to the print version of this title.] Figure I.1. Merian’s flos pavonis (literally, peacock flower), which she described as a nine-foot-tall plant with brilliant yellow and red blossoms. Note the hearty seed (shown on the right through the opening in the pod) with which Merian claimed Arawak and African slave women aborted their children. Various parts of this plant are still used in many places in the Caribbean today as an abortifacient. Introduction 3 rightly focused on the explosion of knowledge associated with the scien- tific revolution and global expansion, and the frantic transfer of trade goods and plants between Europe and its colonies.3 While much literature on colonial science has focused on how knowledge is made and moved be- tween continents and heterodox traditions, I explore here instances of the nontransfer of important bodies of knowledge from the New World into Europe. In doing so, I develop a methodological tool that Robert N. Proctor has called “agnotology”—the study of culturally-induced igno- rances—that serves as a counterweight to more traditional concerns for epistemology.4 Agnotology refocuses questions about “how we know” to include questions about what we do not know, and why not.
Recommended publications
  • An Antillean Plant of Beauty, a French Botanist, and a German Name: Naming Plants in the Early Modern Atlantic World
    Estonian Journal of Ecology, 2012, 61, 1, 37–50 doi: 10.3176/eco.2012.1.05 An Antillean plant of beauty, a French botanist, and a German name: naming plants in the Early Modern Atlantic world Laura Hollsten Faculty of Arts, Åbo Akademi University, 20500 Åbo, Finland; [email protected] Received 10 December 2010, revised 7 March 2011, accepted 27 June 2011 Abstract. This paper investigates the naming of plants in the work of the French botanist Charles Plumier (1646–1704). Plumier made three trips to the French Antilles between 1690 and 1697, was appointed royal botanist in 1693, and published his first work, Description des Plantes de l’Amérique, in the same year. Plumier was the first ‘modern’ botanist to describe the flora of the Caribbean in a time when natural history underwent significant qualitative changes as a result of the European expansion and transatlantic contacts. Plumier’s ambition was to replace the confusing multitude of names given to New World plants with a universal taxonomically based nomenclature. His modernity and scientific ethos manifest themselves in his neutral way of organizing the plants according to a taxonomic system and his use of a Latin nomenclature, often naming plants after well-known botanists. Through Plumier’s naming process, I argue, it is possible to highlight the colonial and Atlantic context of his work, his network as part of the scientific elite of his country, and his professionalism resulting from years of botanical studies. Key words: history of botany, early modern natural history, plant nomenclature. INTRODUCTION According to a story entitled ‘The Tree of Riches’, the French botanist Charles Plumier decided that he would like to travel the world and get rich (Pellowski, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Archival Afterlives: Life, Death, and Knowledge-Making in Early Modern British Scienti C and Medical Archives
    Archival Afterlives: Life, Death, and Knowledge-Making in Early Modern British Scienti!"c and Medical Archives Kohn Centre The Royal Society 2 June 2015 Conference Description: Early modern naturalists collected, generated, and shared massive amounts of paper. Inspired by calls for the wholesale reform of natural philosophy and schooled in humanist note-taking practices, they generated correspondence, reading notes (in margins, on scraps, in notebooks), experimental and observational reports, and drafts (rough, partial, fair) of treatises intended for circulation in manuscript or further replication in print. If naturalists claimed all knowledge as their province, natural philosophy was a paper empire. In our own day, naturalists’ materials, ensconced in archives, libraries, and (occasionally) private hands, are now the foundation of a history of science that has taken a material turn towards paper, ink, pen, and !"ling systems as technologies of communication, information management, and knowledge production. Recently, the creation of such papers, and their originators’ organization of them and intentions for them have received much attention. The lives archives lived after their creators’ deaths have been explored less often. The posthumous fortunes of archives are crucial both to their survival as historical sources today and to their use as scienti!"c sources in the past. How did (often) disorderly collections of paper come to be “the archives of the Scienti!"c Revolution”? The proposed conference considers the histories of these papers from the early modern past to the digital present, including collections of material initially assembled by Samuel Hartlib, John Ray, Francis Willughby, Isaac Newton, Hans Sloane, Martin Lister, Edward Lhwyd, Robert Hooke, and Théodore de Mayerne.
    [Show full text]
  • Maria Sibylla Merian and Metamorphosis
    PUBLISHED: 21 FEBRUARY 2017 | VOLUME: 1 | ARTICLE NUMBER: 0074 books & arts Maria Sibylla Merian and metamorphosis ANNIVERSARY Despite the fact that art is subjective and concerned with aesthetics, whereas science is an objective enterprise based on observation and experimentation, a combination of these dissimilar activities can yield surprising results. A small group of world-class biologists have also been gi"ed artists. #is group includes the German botanist Julius Sachs, founder of experimental plant physiology 1; the zoologist Ernst Haeckel; and, perhaps less known, the entomologist Maria Sibylla Merian (Fig. 1), the tricentenary of whose death falls this year. Merian made signi%cant contributions to the foundation of developmental biology and ecology, but has been neglected. Born in 1647 in Frankfurt (Main), Germany, Merian Figure 2 | Merian’s paintings. Left, watercolour image on the title page of Merian’s first scientific book developed her skill painting insects and Der Raupen Wunderbare Verwandelung und Sonderbare Blumen-nahrung (The Wonderful Metamorphosis plants under the guidance of her stepfather, of Caterpillars and Strange Flower Nourishment). Merian described the complete life cycles of numerous the artist Jacob Marrel. At the age of 13, she insect species, including their destructive feeding behaviour on host plants, and rejected the then was already an accomplished painter, with popular idea of an origin of insects via ‘spontaneous generation’. Image courtesy of U. Kutschera. Right, an overwhelming drive to study nature. Merian’s realistic documentation of the “struggle for existence” in a natural world that was, in her view, Merian started to collect insects and plants God’s creation.
    [Show full text]
  • Maria Sibylla Merian's Research Journey to Suriname
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Resources Supplementary Information August 2017 To See for Herself: Maria Sibylla Merian’s Research Journey to Suriname: 1699-1701 Catherine Grimm Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/sophsupp_resources Part of the German Literature Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Grimm, Catherine, "To See for Herself: Maria Sibylla Merian’s Research Journey to Suriname: 1699-1701" (2017). Resources. 6. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/sophsupp_resources/6 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Supplementary Information at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Resources by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. To See for Herself: Maria Sibylla Merian’s Research Journey to Suriname: 1699-1701 By Catherine Grimm Maria Sibylla Merian was born on April, 2 1647 in Frankfurt am Main, one year before the signing of the Peace treaties of Westphalia and the end of the Thirty Years War. Her 55 year old father, the famous artist, engraver and publisher Matthäus Merian, died when she was three. About a year after his death, Maria’s mother, Johanna Sibylla, remarried the painter and art- dealer Jacob Marrel whose family had moved to Frankfurt from the town of Frankenthal when he was 10, and who also had lived for a number of years in Utrecht, before returning to Frankfurt in 1651. He had been a student of the well-known still life artist Geog Flegel as well as the Dutch painter Jan Davidzs de Heem.1 From an early age, Merian appears to have been surprisingly adept at pursuing her own interests, without arousing the disapproval of her immediate social environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S527
    January 26, 1996 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S527 Fayetteville. He was awarded the mas- their efforts. I ask that the letter from vision of Wildlife and Marine Resources ter of arts degree in history and polit- Paul Alan Cox, Ph.D., chairman of the under your leadership has made important ical science from the University of Ar- board of Seacology Foundation to Gov- progress in evaluating and protecting the wildlife of American Samoa. Coastal Zone kansas at Fayetteville and the juris ernor Lutali be printed in the RECORD. The letter follows: Management has flourished under your lead- doctor degree from George Washington ership. But perhaps most important has been University in Washington, DC. THE SEACOLOGY FOUNDATION, your quiet personal example. You quietly led A well-respected executive in the na- Springville, UT. October 24, 1995. an effort to re-introduce the rare Samoa tional electric cooperative community, Gov. A.P. LUTALI, toloa or duck to your home island of Annu’u. Carl also has worked tirelessly in nu- Office of the Governor, American Samoa Gov- The crack of dawn has frequently found you merous civic and community affairs ernment, Pago Pago, American Samoa. on your hands and knees weeding the garden positions in our State and our region. DEAR GOVERNOR LUTALI: On behalf of the plot in front of the territorial offices. Many Board of Directors and the Scientific Advi- Mr. President, wherever Carl have seen you picking up rubbish and doing sory Board of the Seacology Foundation, it your own part as private citizen to beautify Whillock has lived and worked gives me great pleasure to inform you that throughout our State, his support for the exquisite islands of American Samoa.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity: the Orw Ld of Life Charles H
    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® DLPS Faculty Publications Library Public Services 5-2001 Biodiversity: The orW ld of Life Charles H. Smith Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/dlps_fac_pub Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Higher Education Commons, and the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Charles H. Smith, "Biodiversity: The orldW of Life" (May 2001). Choice 38(9): 1565-1580. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in DLPS Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. I BIBLIOGRAPHIC ESSAY The World of Life: Biodiversity Studies BY CHARLES SMITH multifarious ecosystems of the world. The key to effective analysis ofbio­ the literature on the former, concerned as diversity is the precise definition of it is with the basic description of millions Introduction each level oforganization when it is of species of animals and plants-not to being addressed. mention suborganismallevels of organiza­ tion and communities, ecosystems, and Wbat i.J bioiJiverJity? This definition may strike some ob­ the biosphere as a whole-would exist ( and servers as being just the slightest bit vague, did exist) independent of the recent bio­ or some 15 years the public at least to the extent that it fails to explain diversity movement. Practically every state has witnessed a sustained world­ how the concept is related to the various in the nation is represented by at least one Fwide movement that concerns natural studies that make it up, and that monographic study of its resident mam­ itself with understanding the in fact have existed as independently con­ mals, as are many individual species of mam­ natural diversity oflife, and how such di­ ceived lines of research for more than a mals (and even particular mammals from versity can be conserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Appropriation in the 'Red' Atlantic: Translating a Mi'kmaq
    1 Medical Appropriation in the ‘Red’ Atlantic: Translating a Mi’kmaq smallpox cure in the mid-nineteenth century Farrah Lawrence-Mackey University College London Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History and Philosophy of Science Department of Science and Technology Studies 2018 2 I, Farrah Mary Lawrence-Mackey confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 3 ABSTRACT This thesis answers the questions of what was travelling, how, and why, when a Kanien’kehaka woman living amongst the Mi’kmaq at Shubenacadie sold a remedy for smallpox to British and Haligonian colonisers in 1861. I trace the movement of the plant (known as: Mqo’oqewi’k, Indian Remedy, Sarracenia purpurea, and Limonio congener) and knowledges of its use from Britain back across the Atlantic. In exploring how this remedy travelled, why at this time and what contexts were included with the plant’s removal I show that rising scientific racism in the nineteenth century did not mean that Indigenous medical flora and knowledge were dismissed wholesale, as scholars like Londa Schiebinger have suggested. Instead conceptions of indigeneity were fluid, often lending authority to appropriated flora and knowledge while the contexts of nineteenth-century Britain, Halifax and Shubenacadie created the Sarracenia purpurea, Indian Remedy and Mqo’oqewi’k as it moved through and between these spaces. Traditional accounts of bio-prospecting argue that as Indigenous flora moved, Indigenous contexts were consistently stripped away. This process of stripping shapes Indigenous origins as essentialised and static.
    [Show full text]
  • Gardenias, Magnolias and Oleanders
    Gardenias, Magnolias and Oleanders Gardenia jasminoides is cultivated throughout the gardens of New Orleans as a sweet-scented flowering shrub. The Gardenia is a genus of 142 species of flowering plants in the coffee family, Rubiaceae, native to the tropical and subtropical regions of Africa, southern Asia, Australasia and Oceania. Several species occur on the island of Hawaii, and is known in to many people in New Orleans as the Cape jasmine. The fragrant and beautiful gardenia Since this species originated in warm humid tropical areas, it demands high humidity to thrive and bright (not direct) light. It flourishes in acidic soils with good drainage and thrives in Crescent City temperatures. Flowering is from about mid-spring to mid-summer, with May the predominant month. The stunningly beautiful shrub with the fragrant white flowers did not derive its name from “the garden”, however. It all began in Charleston, South Carolina, where there lived a Scottish-born botanist named Dr. Alexander Garden (1730 -1791). He was a member of several learned societies and was a fellow of the Royal Society in London. He collected all manner of flora and fauna, which he packed up and sent to London zoologist John Ellis and famous Swedish naturalist Carl Linnaeus. He bundled up and sent them various magnolias and some Gordonia specimens, but the plant that bears his name had nothing to do with his particular efforts. It wasn’t even American. Linnaeus was strongly persuaded by Ellis to name something after Garden, so the Gardenia became the name for the Cape jasmine, also known as Cape jessamine.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerard's Herbal the OED Defines the Word
    Gerard’s Herbal The OED defines the word ‘herbal’ (n) as: ‘a book containing the names and descriptions of herbs, or of plants in general, with their properties and virtues; a treatise in plants.’ Charles Singer, historian of medicine and science, describes herbals as ‘a collection of descriptions of plants usually put together for medical purposes. The term is perhaps now-a-days used most frequently in connection with the finely illustrated works produced by the “fathers of botany” in the fifteenth and sixteenth century.’1 Although the origin of the herbal dates back to ‘remote antiquity’2 the advent of the printing press meant that herbals could be produced in large quantities (in comparison to their earlier manuscript counterparts) with detailed woodcut and metal engraving illustrations. The first herbal printed in Britain was Richard Banckes' Herball of 15253, which was written in plain text. Following Banckes, herbalists such as William Turner and John Gerard gained popularity with their lavishly illustrated herbals. Gerard’s Herbal was originally published in 1597; it is regarded as being one of the best of the printed herbals and is the first herbal to contain an illustration of a potato4. Gerard did Illustration of Gooseberries from not have an enormously interesting life; he was Gerard’s Herbal (1633), demonstrating the intricate detail that ‘apprenticed to Alexander Mason, a surgeon of 5 characterises this text. the Barber–Surgeons' Company’ and probably ‘travelled in Scandinavia and Russia, as he frequently refers to these places in his writing’6. For all his adult life he lived in a tenement with a garden probably belonging to Lord Burghley.
    [Show full text]
  • Vernon H. Heywood the Cultural Heritage Of
    Bocconea 28: 161-172 https://doi.org/10.7320/Bocc28.161 Version of Record published online on 22 November 2019 Vernon H. Heywood The cultural heritage of Mediterranean botanic gardens* Abstract Heywood, V. H.: The cultural heritage of Mediterranean botanic gardens. — Bocconea 28: 161- 172. 2019. — ISSN: 1120-4060 printed, 2280-3882 online. Mediterranean botanic gardens represent a rich and diverse cultural heritage, both tangible and intangible. They include spectacular landscapes and the plantings include many important intro- ductions of both ornamental and economically important species. The gardens also contain many buildings of great architectural merit, some historic, some modern. Also important are the historic glasshouses and shade houses. Many of these gardens contain important herbarium collections that have served a key role in the preparation of Floras and major botanical libraries containing historical works of great value as well as works of art, sculptures paintings, drawings, and other illustrations and invaluable historic archives. The intangible cultural heritage of these gardens is represented by the impact that they have had the inhabitants of the cities and towns in which they are located and on generations of visitors – students, professionals and the public. With the decline of teaching and research in botany as a university discipline, some of these collections are at risk of dispersal or an even worse fate. In the face of these uncertainties a series of proposals to help safeguard this invaluable heritage is given, including the compilation of an inventory of these his- torically important buildings, libraries, works of art and archives and the use of the latest scanning and imaging techniques so that a visual record is prepared.
    [Show full text]
  • The History and Influence of Maria Sibylla Merian's Bird-Eating Tarantula: Circulating Images and the Production of Natural Knowledge
    Biology Faculty Publications Biology 2016 The History and Influence of Maria Sibylla Merian's Bird-Eating Tarantula: Circulating Images and the Production of Natural Knowledge Kay Etheridge Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/biofac Part of the Biology Commons, and the Illustration Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Recommended Citation Etheridge, K. "The History and Influence of Maria Sibylla Merian’s Bird-Eating Tarantula: Circulating Images and the Production of Natural Knowledge." Global Scientific Practice in the Age of Revolutions, 1750 – 1850. P. Manning and D. Rood, eds. (Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press. 2016). 54-70. This is the publisher's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/biofac/54 This open access book chapter is brought to you by The Cupola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The Cupola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The History and Influence of Maria Sibylla Merian's Bird-Eating Tarantula: Circulating Images and the Production of Natural Knowledge Abstract Chapter Summary: A 2009 exhibition at the Fitzwilliam Museum on the confluence of science and the visual arts included a plate from a nineteenth-century encyclopedia owned by Charles Darwin showing a tarantula poised over a dead bird (figure 3.1).1 The genesis of this startling scene was a work by Maria Sibylla Merian (German, 1647–1717), and the history of this image says much about how knowledge of the New World was obtained, and how it was transmitted to the studies and private libraries of Europe, and from there into popular works like Darwin’s encyclopedia.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue 294 Recent Acquisitions CATALOGUE 294 Catalogue 294
    ANTIQUARIAAT JUNK ANTIQUARIAAT Antiquariaat Junk Catalogue 294 1 Recent Acquisitions CATALOGUE CATALOGUE 294 Catalogue 294 Old & Rare Books Recent Acquisitions 2016 121 Levaillant Catalogue 294 Recent Acquisitions Antiquariaat Junk B.V. Allard Schierenberg and Jeanne van Bruggen Van Eeghenstraat 129, NL-1071 GA Amsterdam The Netherlands Telephone: +31-20-6763185 Telefax: +31-20-6751466 [email protected] www.antiquariaatjunk.com Natural History Booksellers since 1899 Please visit our website: www.antiquariaatjunk.com with thousands of colour pictures of fine Natural History books. You will also find more pictures of the items displayed in this catalogue. Items 14 & 26 sold Frontcover illustration: 88 Gessner Backcover illustration: 121 Levaillant GENERAL CONDITIONS OF SALE as filed with the registry of the District Court of Amsterdam on No- vember 20th, 1981 under number 263 / 1981 are applicable in extenso to all our offers, sales, and deliveries. THE PRICES in this catalogue are net and quoted in Euro. As a result of the EU single Market legisla- tion we are required to charge our EU customers 6% V.A.T., unless they possess a V.A.T. registration number. Postage additional, please do not send payment before receipt of the invoice. All books are sold as complete and in good condition, unless otherwise described. EXCHANGE RATES Without obligation: 1 Euro= 1.15 USD; 0.8 GBP; 124 JPY VISITORS ARE WELCOME between office hours: Monday - Friday 9.00 - 17.30 OUR V.A.T. NUMBER NL 0093.49479B01 134 Meyer 5 [1] AEMILIANUS, J. Naturalis de Ruminantibus historia Ioannis Aemy- liani... Venetiis, apaud Franciscum Zilettum, 1584.
    [Show full text]