High Peak Borough Council

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

High Peak Borough Council BUXTON APPENDIX 1 Electoral – statistics 2018 11 existing Councillors Electorate forecast 18766 Overall electorate per councillor target is 1765 PROPOSAL Summary of changes Area Existing Existing Existing Proposed New Proposed Ward No. of Ward: Electoral Wards: No. of Councillors Electoral Wards Electoral Councillors Variance Variance (2018) % % BUXTON Barms 1 -3 Barms -3 1 Burbage 1 +18 Burbage +2.89 1 Buxton 2 0 Buxton 0 2 Central Central Corbar 2 -11 Corbar -6.17 2 Cote 2 -8 Cote -8.10 2 Heath Heath Stone 2 -1 Stone -1 2 Bench Bench Temple 1 -12 Temple -6.28 1 OVERVIEW 3 of the existing Wards within Buxton are forecast to have imbalances of +/- 10%, namely Burbage, Corbar and Temple. Burbage is the only electoral ward in Buxton where councillors represent too many electors when compared with the forecast target of 1765 electorate per councillor. To improve the electoral equality in Burbage it has been necessary to reduce the number of electors in the existing ward and to seek to increase the electorate elsewhere. Other than a minor adjustment to the boundary between Temple and Cote Heath, to correct an irregularity, it is not proposed to amend the boundary of the distinct community and parished area of Cote Heath. The existing wards of Barms, Stone Bench and Buxton Central have acceptable electoral equality and no changes are proposed in those wards. DETAILED PROPOSALS Overall, there are 3 changes proposed in the Buxton area and the areas and properties affected are shown on the attached plans. The changes proposed in Buxton mean that all electoral wards will be within the Commission’s target of +/-10%. The proposals within each ward are described in more detail below. Burbage Ward One change is proposed in the existing Burbage electoral ward which has to reduce its number of electors considerably to achieve the equality target. It is proposed that 275 electors should be transferred to the Corbar ward. These electors are situated in the following areas and the combined area is shown on the plan attached. a development in the Otterhole Farm area all of Wyehead Close into Corbar. (Wyehead Close is currently divided between the Burbage and Corbar Wards) This proposal improves the electoral equality in both the Burbage and Corbar Wards. The area to transfer has well defined boundaries and does not appear to divide communities. Indeed in the case of Wyehead Close, it resolves the issue of the properties in that Close being split between two wards. The effect of transferring 275 electors from Burbage to Corbar means that the Burbage Ward achieves an electoral equality of +2.89% a significant improvement on the existing electoral equality. Temple Ward Two changes are proposed affecting the Temple Ward which needs additional electors in order to improve its electoral variance. It is proposed that 93 electors off Macclesfield Road be transferred from Corbar to Temple. It is further proposed to make a small change to the boundary between Temple and Cote Heath (10 electors) to remove from Cote Heath those properties which are accessed through the Temple Ward. Plans showing the area of the 93 electors from Corbar to Temple and the 10 electors from Cote Heath to Temple are shown attached. The areas to transfer have well defined boundaries and do not appear to divide communities. The effect of transferring these two areas improves the electoral equality in the Temple Ward and it now achieves an equality of -6.28% which is well within the Commission’s target of +/- 10%. Corbar Ward For the reasons outlined above, it is proposed that 275 electors in the Otterhole Farm, St John’s Road, and Wyehead close area should be transferred to the Corbar Ward from the Burbage Ward. Again, for the reasons outlined above, a further small area comprising 93 electors off Macclesfield Road is proposed to be transferred from Corbar to Temple. The areas have well defined boundaries and would appear to have minimal impact on the community. The effect of transferring these two areas improves the electoral equality in the Corbar Ward and it now achieves an equality of -6.17% which again is well within the Commission’s target of +/- 10%. Cote Heath Ward One slight change is proposed to the Cote Heath Ward. The existing electoral variance within the Cote Heath ward is -8% which is already within the Commission’s target of +/-10%. However, to improve the variance further would have a detrimental effect on the existing community and the parished part of that ward. It is, however, proposed to correct an irregularity in the case of a small number of electors (10) who occupy properties accessible only through the Temple Ward. The area is shown on the attached plan. It is proposed to transfer this area to the Temple Ward. The effect of the transfer has a marginal effect on the electoral equality in Cote Heath which moves from - 8% to -8.10%. Buxton Central Ward No changes proposed. Electoral variance 0% Barms No changes proposed. Electoral variance -3% Stone Bench No changes proposed. Electoral variance -1% CHANGES TO ELECTORATE BURBAGE (+18%) 2091 electors - 275 to Corbar 1816 electors New electoral variance = +2.89% TEMPLE (-12%) 1551 electors + 93 from Corbar 1644 electors + 10 from Cote Heath 1654 electors New electoral variance= -6.28% CORBAR (-11%) 3131 +275 from Burbage 3406 - 93 to Temple 3313 ÷ 2 Councillors = 1656 electors New electoral variance = -6.17% COTE HEATH (-8%) 3255 electors - 10 to Temple 3245 electors ÷ 2 Councillors = 1622 electors New electoral variance= -8.10% BUXTON CENTRAL (0%) 3520 electors ÷ 2 Councillors = 1760 - no change. Variance 0% BARMS (-3%) 1714 – no change. Variance -3% STONE BENCH (-1%) 3504 ÷2 Councillors = 1752 – no change. Variance -1% Revised Buxton Wards Proposals 275 Electors from Burbage to Corbar 10 electors from Cote Heath to Temple 93 electors from Corbar into Temple GLOSSOP Electoral – statistics 2018 15 existing Councillors Electorate forecast 27490 Overall electorate per councillor target is 1765 PROPOSAL Summary of changes Area Existing Ward Existing Existing Proposed New Proposed No. of Ward: Electoral Wards: No. of Councillors Electoral Wards Electoral Councillors Variance Variance (2018) % % GLOSSOP Dinting 1 -7 Dinting No proposal Gamesley 1 +2 Gamesley No proposal Hadfield North 1 -13 Hadfield North No proposal Hadfield South 2 +2 Hadfield South No proposal Howard Town 2 +5 Howard Town No proposal Old Glossop 2 +12 Old Glossop No proposal Padfield 1 +20 Padfield -0.45 1 Simmondley 2 +10 Simmondley No proposal St John’s 1 -2 St John’s No proposal Tintwistle 1 +4 Tintwistle +4 1 Whitfield 1 -3 Whitfield +3.57 1 OVERVIEW 4 of the existing Wards within Glossop are forecast to have imbalances of +/- 10%, namely Hadfield North, Old Glossop, Padfield and Simmondley. All wards, with the exception of Hadfield North, Dinting and St. John’s, have electoral variances in excess of the target of 1765 electors per councilor. It has not been possible to reach agreement on proposals to address the electoral imbalances in all of the existing wards within Glossop. The proposals outlined in this document address only the electoral imbalances in Padfield and Whitfield electoral wards. The changes are shown on maps numbered 1 to 4. No changes are proposed to the existing Tintwistle ward which has an acceptable electoral equality well within the Commission’s criteria. - 1 - DETAILED PROPOSALS 1. Padfield Ward The existing Padfield ward has a forecasted electoral variance of +20% and needs a significant reduction in electors in order to improve its electoral equality. Conversely, Hadfield North ward which adjoins the Padfield ward has a forecasted electoral variance of -13% and needs a significant increase in electors to improve its electoral equality. On the shared boundary between the two wards, it is proposed to transfer 286 electors in the area off Station Road, Bankbottom and Waterside from Padfield ward to Hadfield North ward. (Map 1A refers) In addition it is proposed to transfer a further area comprising 68 electors, including Church Street, Gladstone Street and Queen Street, from Padfield Ward. This area adjoins the existing Hadfield South ward but there are alternative proposals being submitted to the Commission by the political groups which will ultimately affect the transfer of this area of electors. In one case, the aforementioned area will remain in Hadfield South and in the other case, the area will form part of a new Hadfield North ward following the redrawing of the boundary between Hadfield North and South. The two changes, namely the transfers of the areas from Padfield Ward, outlined above will not significantly affect the existing communities in those areas. The effect of the changes in the Padfield ward will be to improve the electoral variance from +20% to -0.45%. 2. Whitfield Ward It is proposed to transfer an area off Chunal Lane from Simmondley ward to Whitfield ward. (Map 2 refers) The area comprises 89 electors and will assist in improving the electoral variances in both wards without affecting detrimentally the community in this area. In addition, it is proposed to transfer 25 electors on Cross Cliffe in Old Glossop ward into Whitfield ward. (Map 3 refers) This proposal will rectify an existing anomaly whereby it is not possible for these electors to get to the rest of Old Glossop Ward without first leaving the ward. The final proposal to the Whitfield Ward is a minor change to transfer 3 electors in the Lower Bank Farm area of Old Glossop ward. (Map 4 refers) The transfer will improve community cohesion in this area. The effect of these changes would be to achieve a variance for the Whitfield ward of +3.57% (from -3.06%) - 2 - 3.
Recommended publications
  • Peak Sub Region
    Peak Sub Region Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment Final Report to Derbyshire Dales District Council, High Peak Borough Council and the Peak District National Park Authority June 2009 ekosgen Lawrence Buildings 2 Mount Street Manchester M2 5WQ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 5 STUDY INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 5 OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY AREA ............................................................................................... 5 ROLE OF THE STUDY ................................................................................................................ 8 REPORT STRUCTURE.............................................................................................................. 10 2 SHLAA GUIDANCE AND STUDY METHODOLOGY..................................................... 12 SHLAA GUIDANCE................................................................................................................. 12 STUDY METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................... 13 3 POLICY CONTEXT.......................................................................................................... 18 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 18 NATIONAL, REGIONAL AND
    [Show full text]
  • HP Councillors Initiative Fund 2018
    High Peak Borough Council Councillor's Initiative Fund 2018-2019 Projects Project Group Name Project Name Total Agreed £ Councillor(s) Ward Ref CIF CIF 2 Glossop Arts Project “Arts for Wellbeing” 650.00 100.00 Longos, Nick Padfield 100.00 Hardy, Paul Old Glossop 200.00 Kelly, Ed Hadfield North 250.00 Claff, Godfrey Howard Town CIF 3 Glossop Arts Project “Arts for Wellbeing” 200.00 Wharmby, Jean Dinting CIF 4 Dove Holes Cricket Club Upgrading of security 250.00 Roberts, Peter Limestone Peak lighting CIF 5 Gloss Group Social Activities Project 200.00 Wharmby, Jean Dinting CIF 6 Tintwistle Ladies Well Dressing 200.00 Jenner, Pat Tintwistle CIF 7 GYGs - Gamesley Youth GYGs 80.00 McKeown, Anthony Gamesley Gatherings CIF 8 People of Whitfield Whitfield Food Club 200.00 Oakley, Graham Whitfield CIF 9 Buxton Town Team Fairfield Road – Gateway 350.00 Quinn, Rachael Barms to Buxton CIF 10 Eat Well Glossop CIC Eat Well Whitfield 400.00 200.00 Oakley, Graham Whitfield 100.00 Claff, Godfrey Howard Town 100.00 Greenhalgh, Damien Howard Town CIF 11 Wellbeing Group Social Activities 250.00 Fox, Andrew Whaley Bridge CIF 12 Glossop Arts Project “Arts for Wellbeing” 100.00 Greenhalgh, Damien Howard Town CIF 13 Harpur Hill Residents Harpur Hill Community 150.00 Grooby, Linda Cote Heath Association Fun Day CIF 14 Glossopdale Foodbank Glossopdale Foodbank 125.00 Claff, Godfrey Howard Town CIF 15 Glossopdale Foodbank Glossopdale Foodbank 320.00 80.00 Greenhalgh, Damien Howard Town 80.00 Oakley, Graham Whitfield 80.00 Hardy, Paul Old Glossop 80.00 Kelly, Ed Hadfield
    [Show full text]
  • 31-1-2017 Trans Pennine
    Public Agenda Item No. 8(i) DERBYSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL CABINET 31 January 2017 Report of the Strategic Director – Economy, Transport and Communities TRANS-PENNINE HIGHWAY PROJECTS (HIGHWAYS, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE) (1) Purpose of Report To update Cabinet on a number of projects relating to highway links across the South Pennines and to recommend a County Council policy statement on these. (2) Information and Analysis There are currently a number of inter- related pieces of work being undertaken on existing and potential roads across the South Pennines. Essentially, these are a combination of Highways England’s management and maintenance programmes for the strategic road network and priorities for highways improvement emerging from Transport for the North (TfN), which is the sub-national transport body for the north of England. Cabinet will be aware that, in terms of governance, Derbyshire sits within the equivalent Midlands Connect sub-national transport body, but there are clearly strong relationships between the two entities in relation to economic geography and travel. Worthy of note is the considerable amount of work underway relating to connections between Manchester and Sheffield, which inevitably pass through Derbyshire. The key current areas of work on trans-Pennine roads are: • The Mottram Bypass and A57(T) to A57 Link Road The Road Investment Strategy (RIS) which sets out the work of Highways England for the period up to the year 2020-21 includes major schemes which are expected to begin construction during the RIS period. The Mottram Bypass would carry the Trunk Road around the village of Mottram-in-Longdendale (in Tameside) and provide a link between this and the A57 Principal Road near Woolley Bridge in Derbyshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Buxton Museum Apps
    COLLECTIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE PILOT PROJECT BUXTON MUSEUM AND ART GALLERY Evaluation Report April 24 2014 Creating Cultural Capital Lord Cultural Resources is a global professional practice dedicated to creating cultural capital worldwide. We assist people, communities and organizations to realize and enhance cultural meaning and expression. We distinguish ourselves through a comprehensive and integrated full-service offering built on a foundation of key competencies: visioning, planning and implementation. We value and believe in cultural expression as essential for all people. We conduct ourselves with respect for collaboration, local adaptation and cultural diversity, embodying the highest standards of integrity, ethics and professional practice. We help clients clarify their goals; we provide them with the tools to achieve those goals; and we leave a legacy as a result of training and collaboration. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 2 2. Evaluation .......................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 The Process Of Creating Content ................................................................................................. 7 2.2 Participant Feedback .................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Social Media And Marketing ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Peaks Sub-Region Climate Change Study
    Peak Sub-Region Climate Change Study Focussing on the capacity and potential for renewables and low carbon technologies, incorporating a landscape sensitivity study of the area. Final Report July 2009 ! National Energy Foundation "#$ % &' !' ( # ) ( * )(+,$- " ,++++ ./.. Land Use Consultants 0%# 1 $2& " 3,+3,0 . *.4. CONTENTS )!5$ 6" 1 Executive Summary.................................................................................................... 7 2 Study Background and Brief ................................................................................... 11 !7*84'*/#* ............................................................................................. 94.............................................................................................................................. 4 /#* ................................................................................................................... ! 4# ................................................................................................................................. 6 * .................................................................................................................................... 0 4/#* ............................................................................................................. 0 *# ................................................................................... + 3 Policy Context..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • For Public Transport Information Phone 0161 244 1000
    From 29 January Bus TP The 1605 journey from Manchester to Derby on Mondays to Fridays is retimed TP Easy access on all buses Derby Belper Matlock Bath Matlock Bakewell Buxton New Mills Disley High Lane Hazel Grove Stockport Manchester From 29 January 2017 For public transport information phone 0161 244 1000 7am – 8pm Mon to Fri 8am – 8pm Sat, Sun & public holidays This timetable is available online at Operated by www.tfgm.com High Peak PO Box 429, Manchester, M60 1HX ©Transport for Greater Manchester 17-1741–GTP–1500–1117Rp Additional information Alternative format Operator details To ask for leaflets to be sent to you, or to request High Peak large print, Braille or recorded information Hallstead Road, Dove Holes, Buxton, phone 0161 244 1000 or visit www.tfgm.com Derbyshire SK17 8BS Easy access on buses Telephone 01298 814030 Journeys run with low floor buses have no steps at the entrance, making getting on Travelshops and off easier. Where shown, low floor Manchester Piccadilly Gardens buses have a ramp for access and a dedicated Mon to Sat 7am to 6pm space for wheelchairs and pushchairs inside the Sunday 10am to 6pm bus. The bus operator will always try to provide Public hols 10am to 5.30pm easy access services where these services are Manchester Shudehill Interchange scheduled to run. Mon to Sat 7am to 7.30pm Sunday* 10am to 1.45pm and 2.30pm to 5.30pm Using this timetable Stockport Bus Station Timetables show the direction of travel, bus Mon to Fri 7am to 5.30pm numbers and the days of the week.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stock Yard, Marsh Lane, New Mills Trading Estate, High Peak Sk22 4Pp for Sale £375,000 £
    THE STOCK YARD, MARSH LANE, NEW MILLS TRADING ESTATE, HIGH PEAK SK22 4PP FOR SALE £375,000 £ • Commercial yard suitable for B1, B2 and • Existing business and stock subject to B8 users (subject to planning) separate negotiation • Generally level hard surfaced site • Separate offices and workshops • 1.4 acres • 3-phase power available 8 The Quadrant, Buxton, Derbyshire, SK17 6AW Tel: 01298 23038 Fax: 01298 72291 Offices at :Knutsford Tel: (01565) 621 624 Northwich Tel: (01606)• 41318 Chelford Tel: (01625) 861122 Chester Tel: (01244) 317833 Nantwich Tel: (01270) 625410 Tarporley Tel:(01829) 731300 Whitchurch Tel:(01948) 662281 Crewe Tel:(01270) 255396 Beeston Castle Tel:(01829) 262100 • www.wrightmarshall.co.uk SUMMARY LOCAL AUTHORITY Wright Marshall Ltd is pleased to offer for sale this long Any planning enquiries should be directed to: established industrial site, the extent of which is shown edged red on the plan herewith. Separate single width High Peak Borough Council, Council Offices, Glossop Tel: access road leads to the site. 01298 28400 Located to the fringe of New Mills village with access to DIRECTIONS other nearby centres of Disley, Chapel-en-le-Frith, Glossop Leave Buxton on the A6 in a northerly direction passing and Whaley Bridge. The main A6 commuter road through through Dove Holes and continue onto Furness Vale and to Stockport and Buxton town centre is only a short Newtown. At the main junction of the A6 and A6015 into distance away with other amenities available nearby. New Mills turn right and proceed along heading to Birch ACCOMMODATION Vale, turning right into Marsh Lane and the site is located to the left hand side upon entering the Trading Estate.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapel-En-Le-Frith the COPPICE a Stunning Setting for Beautiful Homes
    Chapel-en-le-Frith THE COPPICE A stunning setting for beautiful homes Nestling in the heart of the captivating High Peak of Derbyshire, Chapel-en-le-Frith is a tranquil market town with a heritage stretching back to Norman times. Known as the ‘Capital of the Peak District’, the town lies on the edge of the Peak District National Park, famous for its spectacular landscape. From The Coppice development you can pick up a number of walking trails on your doorstep, including one which leads up to the nearby Eccles Pike and its magnificent 360 views. Alternatively, you can stroll down to the golf course to play a round in a striking rural setting or walk into the town centre to enjoy a coffee in one of the many independent cafés. People have been visiting this area for centuries and not just for the exquisite scenery: the area is well connected by commuter road and rail links to Buxton and Manchester, while the magnificent Chatsworth House, Haddon Hall and Hardwick Hall are all within easy reach. View from Eccles Pike Market Cross THE COPPICE Chapel-en-le-Frith Market Place Amidst the natural splendour of the High Peak area, The Coppice gives you access to the best of both worlds. The town has a distinct sense of identity but is large enough to provide all the amenities you need. You can wander through the weekly market held in the historic, cobbled Market Place, admire the elaborate decorations which accompany the June carnival, and choose to dine in one of Imagine the many restaurants and pubs.
    [Show full text]
  • High Peak Derby to Buxton
    High Peak From 26 May Derby to Buxton 2019 via Matlock Monday to Saturday Code MF MF S MF S MF S MF S S MF MF Derby, Bus Station 0630 0730 0750 0845 0845 0945 0945 1045 1145 1245 1345 1445 1545 1645 1645 1750 1815 1950 Duffield, Co-op 0642 0742 0802 0857 0857 0957 0957 1057 1157 1257 1357 1457 1557 1657 1657 1802 1827 2002 Belper, Trentbarton Bus Garage 0650 0750 0810 0905 0905 1005 1005 1105 1205 1305 1405 1505 1605 1705 1705 1810 1835 2010 Ambergate, Hurt Arms 0658 0758 0818 0913 0913 1013 1013 1113 1213 1313 1413 1513 1613 1713 1713 1818 1843 2017 Matlock Bath, Fishpond 0707 0807 0827 0924 0922 1024 1022 1122 1222 1322 1422 1522 1622 1722 1722 1827 1852 2025 Matlock, Rail Station arr. 0715 0815 0835 0933 0930 1033 1030 1130 1230 1330 1430 1530 1630 1730 1730 1835 1900 2030 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Matlock, Rail Station dep. ..... 0817 0837 0937 0937 1037 1037 1137 1237 1337 1437 1537 1637 1737 1737 1837 1902 ..... Darley Dale, Broadwalk ..... 0827 0847 0947 0947 1047 1047 1147 1247 1347 1447 1547 1647 1747 1747 1847 1912 ..... Rowsley, Peak Village ..... 0834 0850 0951 0950 1051 1050 1150 1250 1350 1450 1550 1650 1750 1750 1850 1915 ..... Bakewell, Buxton Road ..... 0849 0859 1000 0959 1100 1059 1159 1259 1359 1459 1559 1659 1759 1759 1859 1924 ..... Ashford-in-the-Water, The Ashford Arms ..... 0854 0906 1008 1006 1108 1106 1206 1306 1406 1506 1606 1706 1806 1806 1906 1931 ....
    [Show full text]
  • Hardyal Dhindsa Police & Crime Commissioner for Derbyshire
    Hardyal Dhindsa Police & Crime Commissioner for Derbyshire Meet Your Commissioner High Peak 9th March 2020 Derbyshire’s 2nd PCC • Second PCC term – Elected, May 2016 • Building on the work of Alan Charles • Commitment to visit every town and village • Commitment to hold public scrutiny meetings • Neighbourhood Policing is at the heart of my plan Role of the Police and Crime Commissioner • The role of the PCC is to be the voice of the people and hold the police to account. • I am responsible for the totality of policing in Derbyshire. Role of the Police and Crime Commissioner • Set the force budget and determine the precept Role of the Police and Crime Commissioner • Responsible for commissioning services to victims of crime who reside in Derbyshire - Sexual Abuse - General Support - Hate Crime - Young People - Restorative Justice - Domestic Abuse - Child Sexual Exploitation Role of the Police and Crime Commissioner • Set the police and crime objectives for Derbyshire through a Police & Crime Plan • 5 year plan from 2016 to 2021 • Pledges & promises outlined in my manifesto • Plan contains 7 Strategic objectives • Partnership working is a key focus Strategic v Operational Policing • Set the Strategy (plan) and • Responsible for the budget for policing in Derbyshire direction and control of the force • Hire/fire/ hold the Chief Constable to account • Deals with allocation of • Deals with complaints against the officers in a particular SNT, Chief Constable Local Policing Unit • Can not deal with operational • Accountable to PCC matters – crimes, incidents etc Chief Constable Police & Crime Commissioner (Operational Responsibility) (Strategic Responsibility) Strategic Objectives 1. Working to keep the most vulnerable in our communities safe from crime and harm and supporting those who 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial and Temporal Variations of the Chemical Composition in Acid Deposition in the Peak District, Northern England
    Air Pollution VIII, C.A. Brebbia, H. Power & J.W.S Longhurst (Editors) © 2000 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISBN 1-85312-822-8 Spatial and temporal variations of the chemical composition in acid deposition in the Peak District, Northern England D. Driejana^, D.W. Rape/, I.L. Gee' & A.F.R. Watson' 'aric, Department of Environmental and Geographical Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, United Kingdom * Department of Environmental Engineering, Institute of Technology Bandung, Indonesia Abstract Six monitoring sites operated on a weekly basis have been established to examine the impact of current emission reduction strategies on ionic concentrations and depositions in an acid sensitive sub-area of the Peak District. Present concentration and deposition values were compared to the monitoring results in the same area in 1988. On average, H* and nss-SO/" ion concentrations have dropped by approximately 60%, compared to their levels 10 years ago, and NCV has decreased by 30%. However, as the present precipitation amount is higher than that of 1988, I-T and nss-SO/" wet depositions have not decreased in similar proportion as their concentrations. Nitrate deposition shows very little decrease. H\ nss-SO/" and NOg" concentrations are generally higher in summer when the precipitation amount is lower. Significant spatial variability with an increasing gradient from north to south is observed for calcium and sulphate concentrations. 1. Introduction As a response to economic, cultural and environmental factors in the past decade, acidic precursors have been reduced by the introduction of more stringent industrial emission controls and exhaust emission standards. Sulphur dioxide emissions in the U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • TAMESIDE Boundaries With: HIGH PEAK DISTRICT (Derbyshire)
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Review of GREATER MANCHESTER TAMESIDE Boundaries with: HIGH PEAK DISTRICT (Derbyshire) TAMESIDE HIGH PEAK DISTRICT Report No. 590 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO 590 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Mr G J Ell.ert.on, DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell Members Mr K F J Ennals Mr G R Prentice Mrs H R V Sarkany LGB9064.PM THE RT HON CHRIS PATTEN MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF METROPOLITAN COUNTIES AND DISTRICTS THE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH OF TAMESIDE AND ITS BOUNDARY WITH THE BOROUGH OF HIGH PEAK IN DERBYSHIRE COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT AND PROPOSALS INTRODUCTION 1. On 1 September 1987 we wrote to the Metropolitan Borough of Tameside announcing our intention to undertake a review of Tameside as part of our review of the Metropolitan County of Greater Manchester and its Metropolitan Districts under section 48(1) of the Local Government Act 1972. Copies of the letter were sent to the county and district councils bordering the Metropolitan Borough and to parish councils in the adjoining districts; to the Local Authority Associations; the Members of Parliament with constituency interests; and the headquarters of the main political parties. In addition, copies were sent to those government departments, regional health authorities, port authorities, and statutory undertakers which might have an interest, as well as to the English Tourist Board, the local government press and the local television and radio stations serving the area. 2. The Metropolitan Borough of Tameside was requested, in co- operation as necessary with the other principal authorities, to assist us in publishing the start of the review by inserting a notice for two successive weeks in local newspapers so as to give a wide coverage in the areas concerned.
    [Show full text]