Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 166/Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 166/Tuesday, August 27, 2013 52998 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 27, 2013 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and delegated to the FAA Administrator each of the first two launches. AST has and the Associate Administrator for determined that the Air Force’s Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation, who calculation of probability of failure exercises licensing authority under satisfies the requirements in part 417. Waiver to Space Exploration Chapter 509. Weather conditions during the day in Technologies Corporation of SpaceX is a private commercial space September are likely to be unfavorable Acceptable Risk Limit for Launch flight company. It has initiated activities and delays may last for days. SpaceX, AGENCY: Federal Aviation with the U.S. Air Force’s EELV Program therefore, seeks a waiver of this risk Administration (FAA), DOT. to become a certified launch service requirement. provider for National Security space ACTION: Notice of waiver. missions. In addition, SpaceX launches Waiver Criteria SUMMARY: This notice concerns a commercial payloads such as Cassiope. Chapter 509 allows the FAA to waive petition for waiver submitted to the This petition for waiver addresses an a license requirement if the waiver (1) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) upcoming flight that SpaceX plans to will not jeopardize public health and by Space Exploration Technologies undertake transporting the Cassiope safety, safety of property; (2) will not Corporation (SpaceX) to waive a limit satellite and several small secondary jeopardize national security and foreign that the risk to the public from the payloads to earth orbit. This will be the policy interests of the United States; and launch of an expendable launch vehicle first launch by SpaceX from VAFB. It (3) will be in the public interest. 51 not exceed an expected average number will also be the first flight of the Falcon U.S.C. 50905(b)(3) (2011); 14 CFR ¥6 9 v1.1 vehicle, which is larger and has 404.5(b) (2011). of 0.00003 casualties (Ec ≤ 30 × 10 ) greater thrust and payload capacity than from far field blast overpressure. The Sections 417.107(b)(1) Waiver Petition FAA grants the petition, but limits SpaceX’s Falcon 9 vehicle. SpaceX’s Falcon 9 v1.1 launch vehicle will Section 417.107(b)(1) prohibits the collective risk to an expected average launch of a launch vehicle if the E for number of 0.0001 casualties. launch from VAFB and place the c Cassiope satellite into a near-polar orbit. the flight exceeds 0.00003 for any of the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For The launch vehicle will also carry five following three risks: (1) Impacting inert technical questions concerning this secondary payloads to the same orbit. and impacting explosive debris, (2) waiver, contact Charles P. Brinkman, The first stage will coast after stage toxic release, and (3) far field blast Licensing Program Lead, Commercial separation, and then perform an overpressure. For reasons described Space Transportation—Licensing and experimental burn with three engines to below, the FAA waives the restrictions Evaluation Division, 800 Independence reduce the entry velocity just prior to in section 417.107(b)(1) to allow SpaceX Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; entry. Prior to landing in the water, it to conduct a flight with the Ec resulting telephone: (202) 267–7715; email: will perform a second experimental from far field blast overpressure [email protected]. For legal burn with one engine to impact the exceeding 0.00003 as long as total Ec for questions concerning this waiver, water with minimal velocity. The the three hazards combined does not contact Laura Montgomery, Manager, second stage will coast and then exceed 0.0001. The FAA is not waiving Space Law Branch, AGC–250, Office of perform an experimental burn to the Ec requirement for impacting inert the Chief Counsel, Regulations Division, depletion. and impacting explosive debris or for Federal Aviation Administration, 800 The preliminary calculation of Ec for toxic release. Independence Avenue SW., far field blast overpressure shows that Launch of the Falcon 9 Vehicle Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) the launch would exceed the 0.00003 267–3150; email: Laura.Montgomery@ limit imposed by section 417.107(b)(1) The FAA waives the far field faa.gov. under anticipated weather conditions overpressure risk requirement of section SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: for a daytime launch in September. 417.107(b)(1) because the Falcon 9 v1.1 Atmospheric conditions at the launch launch will not jeopardize public health Background site during the anticipated time of and safety or safety of property, a On July 10, 2013, SpaceX submitted a launch increase the far field blast national security or foreign policy petition to the FAA’s Office of overpressure risk. The presence of interest of the United States, and is in Commercial Space Transportation (AST) inversion layers at VAFB is common, the public interest. requesting a waiver for a launch from and results in the reflection of shock i. Public Health and Safety and Safety Vandenberg Air Force Base (VAFB) of a waves from an explosion. This of Property Falcon 9 Version 1.1 (v1.1) launch reflection of shock waves can cause vehicle carrying, a Canadian scientific greater damage than would otherwise be The Falcon 9 v1.1 launch is the first and research satellite called Cassiope, caused without the reflection from the launch of the v1.1 vehicle, and the first and several small secondary payloads. inversion layer. Chances of SpaceX launch from VAFB. Although SpaceX requested a waiver of 14 CFR advantageous weather conditions during the risk from far field blast overpressure 417.107(b)(1), which prohibits the the day in September that would allow is likely to exceed 0.00003, the launch of an expendable launch vehicle a launch that meets the FAA’s risk estimated risks for debris and toxic if the total expected average number of requirements are virtually zero percent.1 release are very low. Based on preliminary calculations performed by casualties (Ec) for the launch exceeds The Falcon 9 v1.1 is a new launch 0.00003 for risk from far field blast vehicle. The U.S. Air Force has the U.S. Air Force for SpaceX, the overpressure. determined that its overall failure collective risk to the public from the The FAA licenses the launch of a probability is nearly fifty percent for Falcon 9 v1.1 launch will be less than launch vehicle and reentry of a reentry 0.0001 approximately forty percent of 2 vehicle under authority granted to the 1 In calculating this percentage, the FAA relies on the time during September. NASA, the Secretary of Transportation in the the standard model developed by the 30th Space Wing from observation of Mission Flight Control 2 The FAA assumes the standard model Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984, Officer response times to initiate flight destruction developed by the 30th Space Wing from observation as amended and re-codified by 51 U.S.C. of a malfunctioning launch vehicle. The 30th Space of Mission Flight Control Officer response times to Subtitle V, chapter 509 (Chapter 509), Wing uses this standard time for its analysis. initiate flight destruction of a malfunctioning VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:54 Aug 26, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00103 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM 27AUN1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 27, 2013 / Notices 52999 U.S. Air Force and other U.S. National the Air Force Memorandum, Overflight capacity for U.S. launch providers, Test ranges use 0.0001 as the expected Risk Exceedance Waiver for Titan IV B– thereby supporting the industrial base casualty limit across all three hazards as 30 Mission, (Apr. 4, 2005). Additionally, and lowering overall launch costs for their criterion See U.S. Air Force the FAA granted a waiver on April 17, commercial customers and the U.S. Instruction 91–217, Space Safety and 2012, for risk from debris up to Government. Mishap Prevention Program (2010); 0.000130 for a Falcon 9 launch from Additionally, the proposed launch is NASA Procedural Requirements 8715.5 Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. consistent with the principles and goals Rev A, Range Flight Safety Program Waiver of Acceptable Risk Restriction of the 2010 National Space Policy, (2010); Range Commanders Council for Launch and Reentry, Notice of which emphasizes the importance of (RCC) Standard 321–10, Common Risk Waiver, 77 FR 24556 (April 24, 2012). developing a robust domestic Criteria Standards for National Test Again, risk was largely a result of a commercial space transportation Ranges (2010). If the Falcon 9 v1.1’s relatively high failure probability that is industry and acquiring commercial collective risk were to exceed 0.0001 unavoidably attached to a new launch space services to meet United States expected casualties, SpaceX would not vehicle. Based on the fact that risk will Government requirements. The launch until conditions improved remain very low, and will be limited to development of commercial launch sufficiently for the risk of the launch to the requirement for government service providers is crucial because, as satisfy the limits allowed by the waiver. launches (Ec of less than 0.0001), noted in the 2010 National Space The increase in the Ec for the first granting a waiver in this case would not Policy, United States access to space launch of the Falcon 9 v1.1 vehicle from jeopardize public health and safety or depends in the first instance on launch VAFB is largely attributable to two safety of property. capabilities. To that end, SpaceX has factors. First, the launch will take place applied to the U.S. Air Force’s EELV from VAFB.
Recommended publications
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2013
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2013 February 2014 About FAA \ NOTICE ###i# £\£\ ###ii# Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. 1 YEAR AT A GLANCE ..............................................2 COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION 2013 YEAR IN REVIEW ........5 7 ORBITAL LAUNCH VEHICLES .....................................21 3 SUBORBITAL REUSABLE VEHICLES ...............................47 33 ON-ORBIT VEHICLES AND PLATFORMS ............................57 LAUNCH SITES .................................................65 COMMERCIAL VENTURES BEYOND EARTH ORBIT ...................79 44 REGULATION AND POLICY .......................................83 3 5 3 53 3 8599: : : ;55: 9 < 5; < 2013 COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION FORECASTS ..........89 4 3 4 : ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ...............................186 2013 WORLDWIDE ORBITAL LAUNCH EVENTS .....................192 DEFINITIONS ..................................................196 ###iii# £\£\ LIST OF FIGURES COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION YEAR IN REVIEW = =999 =99 = =3> =:9;> LAUNCH SITES = :< 2013 COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION FORECASTS =944 =4 =?4;9 =99493 =3 =:5= =< =;=9 =95;@3 =A =;=9 A 3 =994?: =9999 ? =54 =359 =:5 3 =<999= ? =99=5 ?3 =;>>99: =99 ? 3 ==9 ? 3: =3 =>3 =?: =3?: =:? : ###iv# LIST OF TABLES COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION YEAR IN REVIEW 99 : 3< :9=99< <99 ORBITAL LAUNCH VEHICLES 99 99 59595 593 SUBORBITAL REUSABLE VEHICLES 3 :5933 ON-ORBIT VEHICLES
    [Show full text]
  • Competition and Efficiency in the U.S. Launch Vehicle Market to What Extent Has the U.S
    Competition and Efficiency in the U.S. Launch Vehicle Market To what extent has the U.S. launch vehicle market become more allocatively and productively efficient as a result of increased competition? 1 Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................................................................3 Definitions & Guidelines......................................................................................................................3 Method..................................................................................................................................................4 Analysis......................................................................................................................................................7 The state of the market in 2013.............................................................................................................7 Changes from 2013 to 2018................................................................................................................10 The Decline of Cost-Plus................................................................................................................10 Economies of Scale & Vertical Integration....................................................................................12 Restructuring of companies............................................................................................................15 The expansion of SpaceX and overall increase
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Overview Payload Description
    MISSION OVERVIEW SpaceX is targeting Monday, February 17 at 10:05 a.m. EST, or 15:05 UTC, for its fifth launch of Starlink satellites from Space Launch Complex 40 (SLC-40) at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida. A backup launch opportunity is available on Tuesday, February 18 at 9:42 a.m. EST, or 14:42 UTC. Falcon 9’s first stage previously launched the CRS-17 mission in May 2019, the CRS-18 mission in July 2019, and the JCSAT-18/Kacific1 mission in December 2019. Following stage separation, SpaceX will land Falcon 9’s first stage on the “Of Course I Still Love You” droneship, which will be stationed in the Atlantic Ocean. Approximately 45 minutes after liftoff, SpaceX’s two fairing recovery Launch webcast will go live vessels, “Ms. Tree” and “Ms. Chief,” will attempt to recover the two fairing about 15 minutes before liftoff halves. at spacex.com/webcast The Starlink satellites will deploy in an elliptical orbit approximately 15 minutes after liftoff. Prior to orbit raise, SpaceX engineers will conduct data reviews to ensure all Starlink satellites are operating as intended. Once the checkouts are complete, the satellites will then use their onboard ion thrusters to move into High-resolution photos will be their intended orbits and operational altitude of 550 km. posted at flickr.com/spacex PAYLOAD DESCRIPTION SpaceX is leveraging its experience in building rockets and spacecraft to deploy the world's most advanced broadband internet system. With performance that far surpasses that of traditional satellite internet and a global network unbounded by ground infrastructure limitations, Starlink will deliver high speed broadband internet to locations where access has been unreliable, expensive, or completely unavailable.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 January 2017 Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 i Contents About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2017) Publication produced for FAA AST by The Tauri Group under contract. NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 GENERAL CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 5 Launch Vehicles 9 Launch and Reentry Sites 21 Payloads 35 2016 Launch Events 39 2017 Annual Commercial Space Transportation Forecast 45 Space Transportation Law and Policy 83 Appendices 89 Orbital Launch Vehicle Fact Sheets 100 iii Contents DETAILED CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .
    [Show full text]
  • Spacex's Expanding Launch Manifest
    October 2013 SpaceX’s expanding launch manifest China’s growing military might Servicing satellites in space A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS SpaceX’s expanding launch manifest IT IS HARD TO FIND ANOTHER SPACE One of Brazil, and the Turkmensat 1 2012, the space docking feat had been launch services company with as di- for the Ministry of Communications of performed only by governments—the verse a customer base as Space Explo- Turkmenistan. U.S., Russia, and China. ration Technologies (SpaceX), because The SpaceX docking debunked there simply is none. No other com- A new market the myth that has prevailed since the pany even comes close. Founded only The move to begin launching to GEO launch of Sputnik in 1957, that space a dozen years ago by Elon Musk, is significant, because it opens up an travel can be undertaken only by na- SpaceX has managed to win launch entirely new and potentially lucrative tional governments because of the contracts from agencies, companies, market for SpaceX. It also puts the prohibitive costs and technological consortiums, laboratories, and univer- company into direct competition with challenges involved. sities in the U.S., Argentina, Brazil, commercial launch heavy hitters Ari- Teal Group believes it is that Canada, China, Germany, Malaysia, anespace of Europe with its Ariane mythology that has helped discourage Mexico, Peru, Taiwan, Thailand, Turk- 5ECA, U.S.-Russian joint venture Inter- more private investment in commercial menistan, and the Netherlands in a rel- national Launch Services with its Pro- spaceflight and the more robust growth atively short period.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Satellite Missions (By Year and Sponsoring
    Launch Year EO Satellite Mission (and sponsoring agency) 2008 CARTOSAT-2A (ISRO) 1967 Diademe 1&2 (CNES) 2008 FY-3A (NSMC-CMA / NRSCC) 1975 STARLETTE (CNES) 2008 OSTM (Jason-2) (NASA / NOAA / CNES / EUMETSAT) 1976 LAGEOS-1 (NASA / ASI) 2008 RapidEye (DLR) 1992 LAGEOS-2 (ASI / NASA) 2008 HJ-1A (CRESDA / CAST) 1993 SCD-1 (INPE) 2008 HJ-1B (CRESDA / CAST) 1993 STELLA (CNES) 2008 THEOS (GISTDA) 1997 DMSP F-14 (NOAA / USAF) 2008 COSMO-SkyMed 3 (ASI / MoD (Italy)) 1997 Meteosat-7 (EUMETSAT / ESA) 2008 FY-2E (NSMC-CMA / NRSCC) 1997 TRMM (NASA / JAXA) 2009 GOSAT (JAXA / MOE (Japan) / NIES (Japan)) 1998 NOAA-15 (NOAA) 2009 NOAA-19 (NOAA) 1998 SCD-2 (INPE) 2009 RISAT-2 (ISRO) 1999 Landsat 7 (USGS / NASA) 2009 GOES-14 (NOAA) 1999 QuikSCAT (NASA) 2009 UK-DMC2 (UKSA) 1999 Ikonos-2 2009 Deimos-1 1999 Ørsted (Oersted) (DNSC / CNES) 2009 Meteor-M N1 (ROSHYDROMET / ROSKOSMOS) 1999 DMSP F-15 (NOAA / USAF) 2009 OCEANSAT-2 (ISRO) 1999 Terra (NASA / METI / CSA) 2009 DMSP F-18 (NOAA / USAF) 1999 ACRIMSAT (NASA) 2009 SMOS (ESA / CDTI / CNES) 2000 NMP EO-1 (NASA) 2010 GOES-15 (NOAA) 2001 Odin (SNSB / TEKES / CNES / CSA) 2010 CryoSat-2 (ESA) 2001 QuickBird-2 2010 TanDEM-X (DLR) 2001 PROBA (ESA) 2010 COMS (KARI) 2002 GRACE (NASA / DLR) 2010 AISSat-1 (NSC) 2002 Aqua (NASA / JAXA / INPE) 2010 CARTOSAT-2B (ISRO) 2002 SPOT-5 (CNES) 2010 FY-3B (NSMC-CMA / NRSCC) 2002 Meteosat-8 (EUMETSAT / ESA) 2010 COSMO-SkyMed 4 (ASI / MoD (Italy)) 2002 KALPANA-1 (ISRO) 2011 Elektro-L N1 (ROSKOSMOS / ROSHYDROMET) 2003 CORIOLIS (DoD (USA)) 2011 RESOURCESAT-2 (ISRO) 2003 SORCE (NASA)
    [Show full text]
  • Dragon Spacecraft, and Commentary on the Launch and Flight Sequences
    SpaceX CRS-3 Mission Press Kit CONTENTS 3 Mission Overview 7 Mission Timeline 9 Graphics – Rendezvous, Grapple and Berthing, Departure and Re-Entry 11 International Space Station Overview 13 Falcon 9 Overview 16 Dragon Overview 18 SpaceX Facilities 20 SpaceX Overview 22 SpaceX Leadership SPACEX MEDIA CONTACT Emily Shanklin Senior Director, Marketing and Communications 310-363-6733 [email protected] NASA PUBLIC AFFAIRS CONTACTS Trent Perrotto Michael Curie Josh Byerly Public Affairs Officer News Chief Public Affairs Officer Human Exploration and Operations Launch Operations International Space Station NASA Headquarters NASA Kennedy Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center 202-358-1100 321-867-2468 281-483-5111 Rachel Kraft George Diller Public Affairs Officer Public Affairs Officer Human Exploration and Operations Launch Operations NASA Headquarters NASA Kennedy Space Center 202-358-1100 321-867-2468 1 HIGH RESOLUTION PHOTOS AND VIDEO SpaceX will post photos and video throughout the mission. High-resolution photographs can be downloaded from: spacex.com/media Broadcast quality video can be downloaded from: vimeo.com/spacexlaunch/ MORE RESOURCES ON THE WEB For SpaceX coverage, visit: For NASA coverage, visit: spacex.com www.nasa.gov/station twitter.com/elonmusk www.nasa.gov/nasatv twitter.com/spacex twitter.com/nasa facebook.com/spacex facebook.com/ISS plus.google.com/+SpaceX plus.google.com/+NASA youtube.com/spacex youtube.com/nasatelevision WEBCAST INFORMATION The launch will be webcast live, with commentary from SpaceX corporate headquarters in Hawthorne, CA, at spacex.com/webcast and NASA’s Kennedy Space Center at www.nasa.gov/nasatv. Web pre-launch coverage will begin at approximately 3:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Y-RMIT Mission Design
    York-RMIT Mars Inspiration Team Mission Design ! Authors Eric Shear Isaac DeSouza Jagannath Shunsuke Kshtriya Miyazaki Majors Undergrad, Undergrad, Undergrad, Graduate Honours Space Honours Space Honours Space Student, Sports Science Engineering Engineering Engineering Universities York York York RMIT ! Advisors Jonathan Clarke David Sharp John Moores Michael Daly Affiliations President, Mars Associate *ESSE Faculty *ESSE Faculty Society Australia Member, Member, York Member, York Academy of University University Management ! *ESSE = Earth and Space Science and Engineering York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto ON, Canada M3J 1P3 RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne VIC 3001, Australia Page !1 of !50 Table of Contents ! Introduction 3 Mission Objectives 3 Requirements & Constraints 3 ! Nomenclature 4 1: Mission Profile 5 1.1: Launch Vehicles 5 !1.2: Flight Plan 5 2: Mission Science 10 2.1: Science Activities 10 !2.2: Mass, Volume & Power Breakdown 11 3: Environmental Control and Life Support (ECLSS) 13 3.1: Fundamental Consumption Requirements 13 3.2: Air Revitalization System 14 3.3: Water Recovery System 16 3.4: Waste Management System 17 3.5: Emergencies 18 3.6: Maintenance 18 !3.7: Mass, Volume & Power Breakdown 20 4: Habitat Design and Accommodations 23 4.1: Crew Needs 23 4.2: Cabin Layout 24 4.3: Storage 26 !4.4: Mass, Volume & Power Breakdown 30 5: Electrical Power Subsystem (EPS) 32 5.1: Power Requirements 32 5.2: Elements 32 !5.3: Mass & Volume Breakdown 34 6: Thermal Control Subsystem (TCS) 35 6.1: Thermal Environments
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Space Law Documents: 2010 Volume 1: National Space Law Documents
    The University of Mississippi School of Law The National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law Informational resources on the legal aspects of human activities using aerospace technologies Space Law: Selected Documents 2010 Volume 1: National Space Law Documents Compiled by P.J. Blount P.J. Blount, editor Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz, editor A supplement to the Journal of Space Law This page intentionally left blank. ii Disclaimer The information contained in this compilation represents information as of March 7, 2011. It does not constitute legal representation by the National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law (Center), its faculty or staff. Before using any information in this publication, it is recommended that an attorney be consulted for specific legal advice. This publication is offered as a servicce to the Center's readership. The documents contained in this publication do not purport to be official copies. Some pages have sections blocked out. These blocked sections do not appear in the original documents. Blocked out sections contain information wholly unrelated to the space law materials intended to be compiled. The sections were blocked out by the Center's faculty and staff to facilitate focus on the relevant materials. iii National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law Founded in 1999, the National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law is a reliable source for creating, gathering, and disseminating objective and timely remote sensing, space, and aviation legal research and materials. The Center serves the public good and the aerospace industry by addressing and conducting education and outreach activities related to the legal aspects of aerospace technologies to human activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 21 Page4
    2008 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts About the Office of Commercial Space Transportation and the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee The Federal Aviation Administration’s The primary goals of COMSTAC are to: Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA/AST) licenses and regulates U.S. • Evaluate economic, technological and commercial space launch and reentry activity institutional issues relating to the U.S. as authorized by Executive Order 12465 commercial space transportation (Commercial Expendable Launch Vehicle industry; Activities) and 49 United States Code Subtitle IX, Chapter 701 (formerly the Commercial • Provide a forum for the discussion of issues Space Launch Act). AST’s mission is to license involving the relationship between industry and regulate commercial launch and reentry and government requirements; and operations to protect public health and safety, the safety of property, and the national security • Make recommendations to the Administrator and foreign policy interests of the United States. on issues and approaches for Federal Chapter 701 and the 2004 U.S. Space policies and programs regarding the Transportation Policy also direct the Federal industry. Aviation Administration to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial launches and reentries. Additional information concerning AST and COMSTAC can be found on AST’s web site, The Commercial Space Transportation Advisory http://ast.faa.gov. Committee (COMSTAC) provides information, advice, and recommendations to the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration within the Department of Transportation (DOT) on matters relating to the U.S. commercial space transportation industry. Established in 1985, COMSTAC is made up of senior executives from the U.S. commercial space transportation and satellite industries, space-related state government officials, and other space professionals.
    [Show full text]
  • Diapositive 1
    PROSPECTS FOR THE SMALL SATELLITE MARKET 4th edition A GLOBAL SUPPLY & DEMAND ANALYSIS OF GOVERNMENT & COMMERCIAL SATELLITES UP TO 500 KG – AN EXTRACT A Euroconsult Executive Report - 2018 PROSPECTS FOR THE SMALL SATELLITE MARKET // AN EXTRACT © Euroconsult 2018 – Approved for public release WHO WE ARE / WHAT WE DO TRAINING PROSPECTS FOR THE SMALL SATELLITE MARKET // AN EXTRACT © Euroconsult 2018 – Approved for public release ABOUT THIS RESEARCH REPORT SCOPE Prospects for the small satellite market presents the various factors that will drive/inhibit growth in demand for small satellites (<500 kg) over the next 10 years. This report considers satellites by four mass categories, six regions, six satellite applications and five manufacturer typologies. EXTENSIVE FIGURES & ANALYSIS FOR THE COMING DECADE All Euroconsult research has, at its core, data derived from over 30 years of tracking all levels of the satellite/space value chain. To this we add dozens of dedicated industry interviews each year, along with the continual refinement of our data models, and the collection and interpretation of company press releases and financial filings. Our consultants have decades of experience interpreting and analyzing our proprietary databases in light of the INCLUDED IN THIS PRODUCT broader value chain. When you purchase research from Euroconsult, you receive Forecast up to 2027 in units and value thousands of data points and the expert interpretation of what this means for specific verticals and sectors of the satellite value chain, including forecasts based on years of data and highly refined All segments of the value chain reviewed models. This report contains thousands of data points.
    [Show full text]
  • NAVIGATION from LEO Current Capability and Future Promise by David Lawrence, H
    WITH RICHARD B. LANGLEY NAVIGATION FROM LEO Current Capability and Future Promise BY David Lawrence, H. Stewart Cobb, Greg Gutt, Michael O’Connor, Tyler G.R. Reid, Todd Walter and David Whelan ith the advent of smartphones, there are now more than four billion devices GPS that make use of GNSS. These satellite Wnavigation systems provide not just the blue dot representing location on our phones, but also support the critical infrastructure we rely upon. The U.S. Iridium Department of Homeland Security recognizes that all 16 sectors of U.S. critical infrastructure depend on GPS — 13 of which have critical dependence. A recent report by London Economics estimates the cost of a GNSS outage to the U.K. alone would be over 1B per day.With autonomous systems on the rise, our reliance on GNSS will only be increasing. As we become more dependent on this technology, we become vulnerable to its limitations. One major shortcoming !" is signal strength. Designed to work in an open-sky environment, GNSS is severely limited in deep attenuation FIGURE 1 The 66-satellite Iridium constellation in low Earth orbit and 31-satellite environments, with little or no service in dense cities or GPS constellation in medium Earth orbit. indoors. Furthermore, we are susceptible to jamming where a 20-watt GNSS jammer can deny service over a city block. features of these signals are also used to reliably validate The proximity of low Earth orbit (LEO) has the potential GNSS PNT solutions in real time to help mitigate potential to provide much stronger signals than the distant GNSS spoofing.
    [Show full text]