Congressional Record—House H1558

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congressional Record—House H1558 H1558 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE March 3, 2015 GDP. There is no set of circumstances Dogs are trying to change that. They Mr. Speaker, Members, I came down where revenue will ever match spend- are focused on ending political polar- to the floor this afternoon to join my ing, Mr. Speaker. The President didn’t ization, reforming Congress, stopping Blue Dog colleagues in calling for all of provide that leadership; my friend from reckless government spending, and cre- us in Congress to come together and do Indiana is. That is why I am so proud ating economic opportunity for Ameri- the work that we have been asked to to be on the floor with you today. cans who have been left behind by this do, the work that we have been sent to Mr. ROKITA. Mr. Speaker, I yield recession. Washington, sent to Congress to do on back the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, I come to work every behalf of the people that we represent. f single day to get things done for Ari- I came to Congress to get things done, zona. I have a proven record of reach- to get things done for the people that I THE BLUE DOG COALITION ing out to members of both political represent, and to get things done for The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. parties to find common ground on the great country that we are all so CURBELO of Florida). Under the Speak- issues ranging from jobs and the econ- privileged to live in and to participate er’s announced policy of January 6, omy to reducing spending and govern- in. 2015, the gentleman from California ment waste. As a cofounder of the As Mr. COSTA mentioned, he and I (Mr. COSTA) is recognized for 60 min- United Solutions Caucus and a No La- served together in the State legislature utes as the designee of the minority bels Problem Solver, I have worked in California, and I am very proud of leader. with members of both parties to get the work that we did there. We were Mr. COSTA. Mr. Speaker, my name is things done. At home, Congressman able to get a lot of things done. In the Congressman JIM COSTA from Fresno, MATT SALMON and I work together to time that I was there, the majority of California. Since I was first elected help Arizona veterans get the care they the time, I chaired the Senate Budget over 10 years ago, I have been a mem- deserve, and I have worked with Con- Committee. That was one of the rea- ber of the Blue Dog caucus. This after- gressman MICHAEL MCCAUL to intro- sons why I was so proud to be a Blue noon, members of the Blue Dog caucus duce legislation that puts an end to Dog, although the common thread that that stretch the width and the breadth automatic pay raises for Members of holds all Blue Dogs together is the of this great country of ours are going Congress. issue of fiscal responsibility. to speak about what brings us to- Neither party is always right. In fact, In my time in Sacramento chairing gether, about the passions that they both parties are often wrong. It is time the Budget Committee, we always had have and the people that they advocate for us to listen to each other and work a balanced budget. Fiscal responsi- for and why they believe that their ef- together to grow our economy, help bility was important, and it is equally forts at being a constructive and a very our country’s families, and honor our as important here in Congress. Nobody positive member of the Blue Dog cau- veterans. Recently, we came together likes the fact that we have huge defi- cus adds value to their ability to rep- to pass bipartisan legislation to pre- cits or huge debts. We understand that some things are unavoidable, but there resent their constituencies and to the vent veteran suicide and improve ac- has to be an understanding of and an vision that I think we, as Americans, cess to mental health care and health intentional effort on the part of all us all share together, which is to make services for veterans. Just this week, to make sure that we are fiscally re- our Congress, to make our representa- we agreed on legislation to expand col- sponsible and that we manage that tive democracy, a more functioning lege savings plans and make higher debt, we manage that deficit, and we system. Because clearly today, the education a reality for students and bring it down to a level that won’t bur- American public, in poll after poll after their families. We need more of these den our children and our grandchildren poll, demonstrate their frustration kinds of accomplishments in Congress. In Arizona, the voters established an in the years to come. with the inability of the United States independent redistricting commission So I was stunned when I came to Congress to come together and to work that allows for an open and transparent Congress and found out that it was on common solutions for our country, process and creates competitive dis- very, very difficult to get anything solutions that share our common val- tricts where neither party has a mo- done, to get people to work together. ues but also involve the art, the art of nopoly. We Blue Dogs have proposed As JIM pointed out, I am one of the the political compromise, too often I similar reforms to create impartial, longer serving Members, so I was believe an art that has become lost fairly drawn districts across the coun- stunned a long time ago in what you here in our Nation’s Capital in Wash- try to cut back on the polarization can probably refer to today as ‘‘the ington, D.C. that cripples our system. good old days,’’ when we were actually So among the first of the members of Mr. Speaker, the American people de- able to work together and get things our caucus that will speak is the gen- serve leaders who do whatever it takes done, but we didn’t have a high level of tlewoman from Arizona’s Ninth Dis- to come up with practical, common- that cooperation even back then. trict, KYRSTEN SINEMA, a colleague of sense solutions that help us move for- Last week, I was with the Aspen In- mine who always is advocating for her ward. It is time for us to focus on areas stitute on a trade conference. Anybody constituency in the most positive of common ground and come up with who is familiar with them knows that ways. real answers to our country’s most they are able to bring together a bipar- Ms. SINEMA. Thank you, Mr. COSTA, pressing problems. So let’s put aside tisan and bicameral representation of and thank you today for organizing the finger pointing and the fighting. Congress, Members from the Senate this Special Order. Let’s roll up our sleeves and get back and Members from the House, Demo- Mr. Speaker, this is an important op- to work. crats and Republicans. They also bring portunity for us to come together and Mr. COSTA. I thank the gentle- together some of the most famous show how bipartisanship can fix our woman from Arizona. scholars to talk about whatever the broken system. Mr. Speaker, our next Blue Dog col- issue of the conference is. I was struck, At home in Arizona, I hear from ev- league who will speak is a gentleman at this trade conference, when one of eryone that Washington is broken. whom I have served with both in the the new Members that we serve with, There is too much time spent playing California State Legislature as well as now starting his sophomore term, after political games and too little time here in Congress. He and I are good the scholars spoke and he was recog- spent working together to get things friends. We both represent wonderful nized, said: I came to Congress to in- done. Most people are sick and tired of parts of California, and he is one of the volve myself in this type of problem Congress’ failing to do its job because longer serving members in the Blue solving, when people came together, of partisan politics. That is why I Dog caucus, the gentleman from north- talked about issues, talked about prob- joined the Blue Dog Coalition, because ern California, Congressman MIKE lems, and talked about solutions. He they prioritize the people they rep- THOMPSON from California’s Fifth Dis- said: And this is the first time since I resent more than their party leader- trict. have been here that we have been able ship. Mr. THOMPSON of California. I to engage in that type of dialogue. Everybody knows that Congress is thank the gentleman, and my friend, That is not right, Members, and we not working effectively, and the Blue for yielding. all know that. We are here to work on VerDate Sep 11 2014 02:17 Mar 04, 2015 Jkt 049060 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\K03MR7.039 H03MRPT1 smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with HOUSE March 3, 2015 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H1559 the problems that face our great coun- b 1630 We just had Mr. THOMPSON talking try, and we need to get down and do There is not a person that any one of about a transportation bill. Everyone that work. us represents who doesn’t know that talks about the need to fix our trans- Mr.
Recommended publications
  • OUR VISION for TAX REFORM Pursue a Bipartisan Process | Address the Debt | Prioritize the Middle Class | Create Jobs | Invest in Infrastructure
    OUR VISION FOR TAX REFORM Pursue a Bipartisan Process | Address the Debt | Prioritize the Middle Class | Create Jobs | Invest in Infrastructure October 4, 2017 THE BLUE DOG COALITION The Blue Dog Coalition is an official caucus in the U.S. House of Representatives comprised of 18 fiscally-responsible Democrats, who are leading the way to find commonsense solutions. They represent the center of the political spectrum, appealing to the mainstream values of the American public. The Blue Dogs are dedicated to pursuing fiscally-responsible policies, ensuring a strong national defense, and transcending party lines to get things done for the American people. [COALITION LEADERSHIP] Rep. Jim Costa (CA-16) Co-Chair for Administration Rep. Henry Cuellar (TX-28) Co-Chair for Communications Rep. Daniel Lipinski (IL-3) Co-Chair for Policy [POLICY TASK FORCE LEADERSHIP] Rep. Charlie Crist (FL-13) Co-Chair, Task Force on Economic Growth Rep. Lou Correa (CA-46) Co-Chair, Task Force on Economic Growth Rep. Josh Gottheimer (NJ-5) Co-Chair, Task Force on Fiscal Responsibility Rep. Stephanie Murphy (FL-7) Co-Chair, Task Force on Fiscal Responsibility Rep. Tom O’Halleran (AZ-1) Co-Chair, Task Force on Government Reform and Accountability Rep. Kurt Schrader (OR-5) Co-Chair, Task Force on Government Reform and Accountability Rep. Vicente Gonzalez (TX-15) Co-Chair, Task Force on National Defense Rep. Brad Schneider (IL-10) Co-Chair, Task Force on National Defense [MEMBERS] Rep. Sanford Bishop (GA-2) Rep. Jim Cooper (TN-5) Rep. Collin Peterson (MN-7) Rep. David Scott (GA-13) Rep. Kyrsten Sinema (AZ-9) Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Report of the Board of State Canvassers
    OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE BOARD OF STATE CANVASSERS GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 2016 Compiled by, JOHN A. G ALE Nebraska Secretary of State MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF STATE CANVASSERS Pete Ricketts Governor John A. Gale Secretary of State Charlie Janssen Auditor of Public Accounts Doug Peterson Attorney General Don Stenberg Treasurer Page | 2 Official Results of Nebraska General Election November 8, 2016 Table of Contents Voting Statistics .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Number of Registered Voters ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Total Voting by Location .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Federal Offices ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 President and Vice President of the United States ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Results by Congressional
    [Show full text]
  • May 26, 2020 the Honorable Nancy Pelosi The
    May 26, 2020 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Speaker Republican Leader U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House of Representatives The Honorable Steny H. Hoyer The Honorable Steve Scalise Majority Leader Republican Whip U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House of Representatives Dear Speaker Pelosi, Leader McCarthy, Leader Hoyer, and Whip Scalise: We write as leaders of the Blue Dog Coalition who believe the United States should craft and conduct national security policy in a way that protects our interests, promotes our values, and—to the greatest extent possible—reflects bipartisan agreement between Democrats and Republicans. We are strongest internationally when we are united domestically, and weakest on the global stage when we are divided along partisan lines. Our adversaries, whether they are nation-states or non- state actors, recognize this fact. They seek, in a variety of ways, to turn Americans against one another. We should be hyper-vigilant not to let them succeed. We also believe that the U.S.-China relationship—a complex mix of competition and cooperation—is arguably the most consequential bilateral relationship in the world. U.S. policymakers in the executive and legislative branches should approach the relationship in a strong, smart, and strategic way. We should stand up for American lives, interests and values whenever they are threatened, while avoiding overheated rhetoric that could undermine those goals. For our part, we have respect for the Chinese people and admiration for the country’s culture and traditions. We also value the contributions that Chinese-Americans have made in this country over generations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Directory of Member-Systems NEBRASKA RURAL ELECTRIC
    NREA NEBRASKA RURAL ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION 2016 Directory of Member-Systems “I therefore regarded the REA...as a step which would extend the blessings of electricity to agriculture throughout the nation.” Sen. George Norris NEBRASKA RURAL ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Troy Bredenkamp Rachael Black Kristen Gottschalk James Dukesherer Wayne Price Tina Schweitzer Linda Hesnard Larry Oetken NEBRASKA RURAL ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION 1244 K Street, Box 82048 Lincoln, Nebraska 68501 Phone: 402/475-4988 Fax: 402/475-0835 website: www.nrea.org Spouse Home Phone/ E-mail Cell Phone/e-mail General Manager Troy Bredenkamp Karol Cell: 402/310-8038 [email protected] Director of Administrative Services & Events Rachael Black Scott Home/Cell: 402/440-3305 [email protected] Government Relations Director Kristen Gottschalk Craig Home: 402/628-5815 [email protected] Cell: 402/540-5700 Assistant Director of Government Relations; Grassroots Coordinator James Dukesherer Nicole Cell: 402/540-7239 [email protected] Public Affairs Director; Editor, Rural Electric Nebraskan Wayne Price Heidi Cell: 402/239-9096 [email protected] Office Assistant Tina Schweitzer Sean Home: 402/421-6704 [email protected] Credit Union Bookkeeper Linda Hesnard Dwight Home: 402/792-9305 [email protected] Job Training & Safety Coordinator Larry Oetken Barb Home: 402/371-5024 [email protected] Cell: 402/640-1689 NEBRASKA RURAL ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Dave Jarecke Greg Nelson Kory Hildebrand NEBRASKA RURAL ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION 1244 K Street, Box 82048 Lincoln, Nebraska 68501 Phone: 402/475-4988 FAX: 402/475-0835 website: www.nrea.org Spouse Home Phone/ Address Cell Phone/e-mail General & Regulatory Counsel Dave Jarecke Kate (office) 402/475-7080 1023 Lincoln Mall, Ste.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Committee Vacancies in the 117Th Congress Last Updated November 25, 2020
    Potential Committee Vacancies in the 117th Congress Last updated November 25, 2020 Congressional committees are a critical part of the legislative process. Committees serve as gatekeepers for legislation, considering and amending bills before they reach the floor. Hearings and investigations shape policy debates and provide critical oversight. At the beginning of each Congress, Members receive their committee assignments. Members pursue membership on committees that align with their interests and priorities, and their assignments are determined by the Democratic Caucus and the Republican Conference - with heavy influence from party leadership and steering committees​.1 When determining committee assignments, the parties weigh member preferences along with seniority, regional balance, and balance among ideological and identity caucuses.2 Committee vacancies present opportunities for returning members to gain spots on new committees and for incoming freshmen to get their initial assignments. Vacancies for committee chairs and ranking members can have major policy implications because those leaders shape committees’ priorities. Committee vacancies may occur due to a preexisting vacancy or because a previous member retired, ran for another office, or lost reelection​. On the Democratic side, Members can receive waivers that allow them to serve on additional committees beyond the caps in Democratic Caucus rules.3 While returning members usually have the option to remain on their previous committees (except for committees with term limits4), ​a returning Democratic committee member using a waiver is not guaranteed the option to keep the committee slot.​ The Democratic Caucus uses waivers to distribute remaining committee slots after all members, including incoming freshmen, have hit their caps. The actual number of vacancies going into the 117th Congress depends on the final partisan composition of the House, which is reflected in the committee ratios negotiated by Democratic and Republican leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Primary Election
    2006 Voter Guide State Affi liate to the National & Candidate Survey Right to Life Committee Primary Election - May 9, 2006 Political Action Committee • 404 S. 11th Street • Lincoln, NE 68508 2006 Survey for State Candidates ABORTION-RELATED QUESTIONS embryos created for the express purpose of medical research? 11. Would you support banning the “use” of cloning of human embryos 1. In its 1973 rulings, Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, the U.S. Supreme either for therapeutic research or for reproductive purposes? Court created a constitutional “right to abortion “which invalidated the 12. Would you oppose efforts to legalize physician-assisted suicide? abortion laws in all 50 states giving us a policy of abortion on demand 13. Do you believe that food and water (nutrition and hydration) along with whereby a woman may obtain an abortion throughout all nine months other basic comfort care, should always be provided to patients, espe- of pregnancy for any reason. Nebraska Right to Life (NRL) believes cially persons with disabilities, the chronically ill and elderly? that unborn children should be protected by law and that abortion is permissible only when the life of the mother is in grave, immediate POLITICAL PARTY QUESTION danger and every effort has been made to save both mother and baby. Under what circumstances, if any, do you believe abortion should be 14. Would you support a pro-life plank in your county, state and national legal? political party platform? 1A. In no case. 1B. Only to prevent the death of the mother. POLITICAL FREE SPEECH QUESTION 1C. In cases of incest and in cases of forcible rape reported to law enforcement authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H8924
    H8924 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE December 7, 2006 The question was taken; and (two- The projected deficit for fiscal year vesting in education, homeland secu- thirds of those voting having responded 2007 is $350 billion, at least that is what rity, veterans or our soldiers, simply in the affirmative) the rules were sus- they tell us, but not true. The real def- paying interest on the national debt. pended and the resolution was agreed icit for fiscal year 2007 is $545 billion. That is the red bar. You can see in con- to. You see, when the people in this House, trast how much we are spending of A motion to reconsider was laid on when the Republican leadership tells us your tax money on education and on the table. that the deficit that is projected for homeland security and on veterans. The majority of the money is going to f fiscal year 2007 is $350 billion, that is counting the money they are bor- help pay interest, not principal, not in- b 1348 rowing from the Social Security trust vesting in education, homeland secu- rity, veterans or soldiers, but paying RECESS fund, with absolutely no provision on how or when or where the money is interest on the debt we already got. So The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- going to come from to pay that debt America’s priorities will continue to go ant to clause 12(a) of rule I, the Chair back. unmet until we get our Nation’s fiscal declares the House in recess subject to I am starting to understand now why, house in order.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Congressional Landscape
    2017 Congressional Update Presented by: Donald R. Cravins, Jr SVP for Policy/ED Washington Bureau [email protected] @dcravins Congressional Leadership of the 115th Congress 2 Senate MajoritySenate LeadershipMajority Leadership 6. Cory Gardner (R-CO) 2. John Cornyn (R-TX) Position: National Republican Position: Senate Majority 1. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) Senatorial Committee Whip Position: Senate Majority Leader Chairman 3. John Thune (R-S.D.) 5. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) Position: Senate Republican Position: Senate Republican Conference Chairman 4. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) Conference vice chairman Position: Senate Republican Policy Committee Chairman 3 Senate MinoritySenate LeadershipMajority Leadership 3. Patty Murray (D-WA) 4. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) Position: Assistant Position: Chair of the 2. Dick Durbin (D-IL) Democratic Leader Democratic Policy and Communications Committee Position: Senate 1. Charles “Chuck” Schumer (D-NY) Democratic Whip Position: Senate Minority Leader 9 Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) Position: Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chairman 5. Elizabeth Warren 6. Mark Warner (D-VA) 7. Amy Klobuchar (D- 8. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) (D-MA) Position: Vice Chair of the MN) Position: Chair of Position: Vice Chair of the Democratic Conference Position: Chair of Outreach Democratic Conference Steering Committee 4 House MajorityHouse Leadership Majority Leadership 2. Kevin McCarthy (CA-23) 5. Luke Messer (IN-6) Position: House Majority Position: Republican Policy Leader 1. Paul Ryan(WI-1) Committee Chairman Position: Speaker of the House 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Dog Coalition
    May 5, 2021 The Honorable Stephanie Murphy Chair Blue Dog Coalition The Honorable Ed Case Chair Blue Dog Coalition The Honorable Tom O’Halleran Chair Blue Dog Coalition Dear Chairs Murphy, Case and O’Halleran, As the House Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure develops the next surface transportation reauthorization bill, our organizations strongly oppose any increase in the existing minimum liability coverage for motor carriers. An increase in insurance requirements is wholly unnecessary, would do nothing to improve highway safety, and would have a severe negative impact on our members by significantly increasing their operational costs. Increasing minimum liability coverage would affect all businesses transporting property, not just long- haul trucking operations. As illustrated by the diversity of our coalition, the impact would be felt in many sectors of the economy that have been working to help our nation recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, including the trucking, agriculture, construction, manufacturing, towing and the materials industries. Raising insurance rates for countless businesses engaged in trucking in the midst of the current economic disruption caused by the virus would undoubtedly lead to the loss of even more American jobs. This policy clearly does not belong in legislation that is designed to support economic recovery and encourage growth. Furthermore, federal research has demonstrated such a change is entirely unnecessary. As required by MAP-21, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) commissioned the John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center to research this issue in greater detail. In 2014, Volpe released its report, which explained, “The vast majority of CMV-caused crashes have relatively small cost consequences, and the costs are easily covered with the limits of mandatory liability insurance” [emphasis added].
    [Show full text]
  • The Suburbanization of the Democratic Party, 1992–2018
    The Suburbanization of the Democratic Party, 1992–2018 David A. Hopkins Boston College [email protected] Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, August 29, 2019. 1 Abstract Over the past three decades, the Democratic Party has become mostly suburban in both the residence of party supporters in the mass public and the composition of its congressional caucus. This transformation reflects migration patterns among American citizens, partisan shifts among some suburban voters, and a serious relative decline over time in the party’s rural strength. The trend of suburbanization has made the party’s elected officials more ideologically unified, especially on cultural issues, but it also works to preclude the partywide adoption of an ambitious left-wing economic agenda. Suburbanization has occurred alongside a growth in the racial heterogeneity of the Democratic mass membership and elite leadership alike, encouraged by the demographic diversification of American suburbs. Democratic suburban growth has been especially concentrated in the nation’s largest metropolitan areas, reflecting the combined presence of both relatively liberal whites (across education levels) and substantial minority populations, but suburbs elsewhere remain decidedly, even increasingly, Republican in their collective partisan alignment. Rather than stimulating a broad national pro-Democratic backlash across suburban communities in general, as is sometimes suggested by political observers, the election of Donald Trump has instead further magnified this existing divergence—leaving American suburbia, like the nation itself, closely and deeply divided between the two major parties. Introduction Political analysts, including academics, are fond of describing the current era of American politics as primarily distinguished by deep and stable partisan loyalties.
    [Show full text]
  • WW-Political-Giving Report
    O`YlkJa_`l7 OYdeYjlkOgj\knk&OYdeYjlkHgdala[YdHjagjala]k ooo&oYdeYjloYl[`&gj_ O`YlkJa_`l7 OYdeYjlkOgj\knk&OYdeYjlkHgdala[YdHjagjala]k PRIMARY RESEARCH FINDINGS: The Walmart PAC and the Walton family continue to give overwhelmingly to the GOP. The primary area of increasing support for Democratic Party candidates is among conservative Democrats in the House of Representatives. Blue Dog Coalition Democrats and members of the Tea Party are overrepresented in Walmart PAC political giving while Progressive Caucus =^fh\kZmlZk^lb`gbÛ\Zgmerng]^kk^ik^l^gm^]' Democrats supported by Walmart were much more likely to oppose key elements of President H[ZfZle^`bleZmbo^Z`^g]Z' At the state level, the company and family further wield their vast resources to undermine the bgm^k^lmlh_PZefZkml\hk^\nlmhf^kl!phkdbg` families) and associates. 2 O`YlkJa_`l7 OYdeYjlkOgj\knk&OYdeYjlkHgdala[Yd Hjagjala]k In 2008 the Wall Street Journal reported that, in fact, Walmart continued to give that Walmart human resources managers more in 2010 to Republicans and other were holding mandatory meetings for store candidates who oppose President Obama’s managers and department heads to “make agenda. it clear that voting for Democratic presi- dential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama would In this report, we examine the political be tantamount to inviting unions in,” ac- expenditures of Walmart’s political action cording to statements from employees who committee, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. PAC for attended the meetings.1 The managers Responsible Government, which makes holding the meetings ominously implied contributions to candidates and other polit- that unionization would mean fewer jobs ical action committees at multiple levels of and that employees would have to pay hefty government.
    [Show full text]
  • Intraparty in the US Congress.Pages
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2cd17764 Author Bloch Rubin, Ruth Frances Publication Date 2014 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ! ! ! ! Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress ! ! by! Ruth Frances !Bloch Rubin ! ! A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley ! Committee in charge: Professor Eric Schickler, Chair Professor Paul Pierson Professor Robert Van Houweling Professor Sean Farhang ! ! Fall 2014 ! Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress ! ! Copyright 2014 by Ruth Frances Bloch Rubin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Abstract ! Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress by Ruth Frances Bloch Rubin Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Eric Schickler, Chair The purpose of this dissertation is to supply a simple and synthetic theory to help us to understand the development and value of organized intraparty blocs. I will argue that lawmakers rely on these intraparty organizations to resolve several serious collective action and coordination problems that otherwise make it difficult for rank-and-file party members to successfully challenge their congressional leaders for control of policy outcomes. In the empirical chapters of this dissertation, I will show that intraparty organizations empower dissident lawmakers to resolve their collective action and coordination challenges by providing selective incentives to cooperative members, transforming public good policies into excludable accomplishments, and instituting rules and procedures to promote group decision-making.
    [Show full text]