DOCSLIB.ORG

Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Lewis and Clark National Historical Park Natural Resource Report NPS/XXXX/NRR—20XX/XXX

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Lewis and Clark National Historical Park Natural Resource Report NPS/XXXX/NRR—20XX/XXX National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Lewis and Clark National Historical Park Natural Resource Report NPS/XXXX/NRR—20XX/XXX ON THE COVER View from Fort Columbia State Park across the mudflats to Cape Disappointment State Park, a unit of Lewis and Clark National Historical Park (T. Hinckley image) Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Lewis and Clark National Historical Park Natural Resource Report NPS/XXXX/NRR—20XX/XXX Jonathan D. Bakker (1) Thomas M. Hinckley (1) Mu-Ning Wang (1) Rachel M. Mitchell (1) Catherine Kilbane Gockel (1) Kern Ewing (1) Joshua J. Lawler (1) Sarah Reichard (1) Lesley Jantarasami (1) (2) Megan McCain (2) Kelly Y. Shea (1) School of Forest Resources, College of the Environment, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 (2) Program on the Environment, College of the Environment, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 This report was prepared under Task Order XXXXXXXXXX of the Pacific Northwest Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (Cooperative Agreement between the National Park Service and University of Washington, H8W07060001, amendment #y) August 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. [Peer review manager: insert one of the following peer review qualifying statements below – 1 & 2 can be combined:] 1. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data. 2. Data in this report were collected and analyzed using methods based on established, peer- reviewed protocols and were analyzed and interpreted within the guidelines of the protocols. 3. This report received formal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data, and whose background and expertise put them on par technically and scientifically with the authors of the information. 4. This report received formal, high-level peer review based on the importance of its content, or its potentially controversial or precedent-setting nature. Peer review was conducted by highly qualified individuals with subject area technical expertise and was overseen by a peer review manager. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. This report is available from [Your Network/Division etc. and URL] and the Natural Resource Publications Management website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/NRPM). [This paragraph can be modified to meet your specific needs]. Please cite this publication as: Bakker, J. D., T. M. Hinckley, M-N. Wang, R. M. Mitchell, C. K. Gockel, K. Ewing, J. J. Lawler, S. Reichard, L. Jantarasami, M. McCain, and K. Y. Shea. 2010. Natural resource condition assessment for Lewis and Clark National Historical Park. Natural Resource Report NPS/XXXX/NRR—20XX/XXX. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS XXXXXX, August 2010 ii Contents Page Figures............................................................................................................................................ ix Tables.............................................................................................................................................. x Appendices..................................................................................................................................... xi Acronyms and Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... xii Executive Summary..................................................................................................................... xiv Context and Methods............................................................................................................ xiv Park Description .................................................................................................................... xv Threats and Stressors ............................................................................................................. xv Information Needs ................................................................................................................ xvi Acknowledgments......................................................................................................................xviii Chapter 1 - NRCA Background Information.................................................................................. 1 Chapter 2 – Context and Methods .................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Preliminary Scoping .......................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Approach............................................................................................................................ 6 2.3 Reporting Areas................................................................................................................. 7 2.3.1 Multiple Park Focus .................................................................................................. 7 2.3.2 Ecological Reporting Units - Common...................................................................... 9 2.3.3 Ecological Reporting Units – LEWI ........................................................................ 10 2.4 Indicator Selection Process.............................................................................................. 10 2.4.1 Assessment Framework............................................................................................ 10 2.4.2 Candidate Resources and Indicators....................................................................... 13 2.5 Forms of Reference Conditions/Reference Values.......................................................... 14 2.6 Common Definitions and Methods.................................................................................. 19 iii 2.6.1 Biodiversity ..............................................................................................................19 2.6.1.1 Species Richness............................................................................................ 19 2.6.1.2 Endangered Species....................................................................................... 20 2.6.1.3 Noxious Weeds.............................................................................................. 21 2.6.1.4 Non-native Species ........................................................................................ 22 2.6.2 Land Cover and Recent Changes in Land Cover..................................................... 22 2.6.2.1 Current and Recent Changes in Land Cover ................................................. 22 2.6.2.2 Historical Land Cover.................................................................................... 23 2.6.3 Climate Change ....................................................................................................... 23 2.6.3.1 Present Trends in Temperature and Precipitation.......................................... 24 2.6.3.2 Projected Changes in Temperature and Precipitation.................................... 24 2.6.3.3 Sea-Level Rise............................................................................................... 25 2.6.3.4 Ocean Acidification....................................................................................... 25 2.6.4 Land Use ..................................................................................................................25 2.6.4.1 Impervious Surfaces ...................................................................................... 26 2.6.4.2 Road Density ................................................................................................. 26 2.6.4.3 Human Population ......................................................................................... 27 2.6.4.4 Zoned Land Use............................................................................................. 28 2.6.5 Air and Water........................................................................................................... 28 2.6.5.1 Air Quality....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Asteraceae Copy.Indd
    Family Asteraceae Family: Asteraceae Spotted Knapweed Centaurea biebersteinii DC. Synonyms Acosta maculosa auct. non Holub, Centaurea maculosa auct. non Lam. Related Species Russian Knapweed Acroptilon repens (L.) DC. Description Spotted knapweed is a biennial to short-lived perennial plant. Seedling cotyledons are ovate, with the first leaves lance-shaped, undivided, and hairless. (Young seedlings can appear grass-like.) Stems grow 1 to 4 feet tall, and are many-branched, with a single flower at the end of each branch. Rosette leaves are indented or divided Old XID Services photo by Richard about half-way to the midrib. Stem leaves are alternate, pinnately divided, Spotted knapweed flower. and get increasingly smaller toward the tip of each branch. Flower heads are urn-shaped, up to 1 inch wide, and composed of pink, purple, or sometimes white disk flowers. A key characteristic of spotted knap- weed is the dark comb-like fringe on the tips of the bracts, found just below the flower petals. These dark-tipped bracts give this plant its “spotted” appearance. Russian knapweed is a creeping perennial plant that is extensively branched, with solitary urn-shaped pink or purple flower heads at the end of each branch. Similar in appearance to spotted knapweed, Russian knapweed can be distinguished by its slightly smaller flower heads, flower head bracts covered in light hairs, with papery tips, and scaly dark brown or black rhizomes, which have a burnt appearance. Family: Asteraceae Spotted Knapweed Leaves and stems of both spotted and Russian knapweeds are covered in fine hairs, giving the plants a grayish cast.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Landscaping in Massachusetts Plant List
    Coastal Landscaping in Massachusetts Plant List This PDF document provides additional information to supplement the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Coastal Landscaping website. The plants listed below are good choices for the rugged coastal conditions of Massachusetts. The Coastal Beach Plant List, Coastal Dune Plant List, and Coastal Bank Plant List give recommended species for each specified location (some species overlap because they thrive in various conditions). Photos and descriptions of selected species can be found on the following pages: • Grasses and Perennials • Shrubs and Groundcovers • Trees CZM recommends using native plants wherever possible. The vast majority of the plants listed below are native (which, for purposes of this fact sheet, means they occur naturally in eastern Massachusetts). Certain non-native species with specific coastal landscaping advantages that are not known to be invasive have also been listed. These plants are labeled “not native,” and their state or country of origin is provided. (See definitions for native plant species and non-native plant species at the end of this fact sheet.) Coastal Beach Plant List Plant List for Sheltered Intertidal Areas Sheltered intertidal areas (between the low-tide and high-tide line) of beach, marsh, and even rocky environments are home to particular plant species that can tolerate extreme fluctuations in water, salinity, and temperature. The following plants are appropriate for these conditions along the Massachusetts coast. Black Grass (Juncus gerardii) native Marsh Elder (Iva frutescens) native Saltmarsh Cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) native Saltmeadow Cordgrass (Spartina patens) native Sea Lavender (Limonium carolinianum or nashii) native Spike Grass (Distichlis spicata) native Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) native Plant List for a Dry Beach Dry beach areas are home to plants that can tolerate wind, wind-blown sand, salt spray, and regular interaction with waves and flood waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient Plants for the Beach Communities
    Resilient Plants for the Beach Communities 1 | Page Table of Contents Native Plants for Costal Dunes............................................................................................ 4 Grasses and Grass like Plants .......................................................................................... 5 Ammophila breviligulata ............................................................................................. 6 Panicum amarum ‘var. arnaruium’ ............................................................................. 7 Panicum virgatum ....................................................................................................... 8 Spartina patens ........................................................................................................... 9 Herbaceous Plants ........................................................................................................ 10 Baptisia tinctoria ....................................................................................................... 11 Liatris pilosa v. pilosa (graminifolia) ......................................................................... 12 Nuttallanthus canadensis.......................................................................................... 13 Oenothera biennis .................................................................................................... 14 Opuntia compressa ................................................................................................... 15 Solidago sempervirens .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 19, 20, and 21, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbre- viated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu and E. A. Mennega (1992+). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Asiatic Sand Sedge on Native Plants and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in a Barrier Dune
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Open Access Master's Theses 2011 IMPACTS OF ASIATIC SAND SEDGE ON NATIVE PLANTS AND ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI IN A BARRIER DUNE William Johnson University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses Recommended Citation Johnson, William, "IMPACTS OF ASIATIC SAND SEDGE ON NATIVE PLANTS AND ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI IN A BARRIER DUNE" (2011). Open Access Master's Theses. Paper 104. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses/104 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IMPACTS OF ASIATIC SAND SEDGE ON NATIVE PLANTS AND ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI IN A BARRIER DUNE BY WILLIAM JOHNSON A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2011 MASTER OF SCIENCE THESIS OF WILLIAM JOHNSON APPROVED: Thesis Committee: Major Professor_____Richard E. Koske______________ _____ Keith T. Killingbeck ___________ _____Laura A. Meyerson ____________ _____Nasser H. Zawia_______________ DEAN OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2011 ABSTRACT The recent expansion of the nonnative invasive Asiatic sand sedge (Carex kobomugi Ohwi) at East Beach State Park, Rhode Island, is reducing populations of the most important native, dune-building species and their associated arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). In contrast to the native American beachgrass (Ammophila breviligulata Fern.) that is dependent upon AMF to thrive in nutrient- poor sand dunes, C.
    [Show full text]
  • And Interspecific Hybridiation in Agaric Fungi
    Mycologia, 105(6), 2013, pp. 1577–1594. DOI: 10.3852/13-041 # 2013 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Evolutionary consequences of putative intra- and interspecific hybridization in agaric fungi Karen W. Hughes1 to determine the outcome of hybridization events. Ronald H. Petersen Within Armillaria mellea and Amanita citrina f. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of lavendula, we found evidence of interbreeding and Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-1100 recombination. Within G. dichrous and H. flavescens/ D. Jean Lodge chlorophana, hybrids were identified but there was Center for Forest Mycology Research, USDA-Forest no evidence for F2 or higher progeny in natural Service, Northern Research Station, Box 137, Luquillo, populations suggesting that the hybrid fruitbodies Puerto Rico 00773-1377 might be an evolutionary dead end and that the Sarah E. Bergemann genetically divergent Mendelian populations from which they were derived are, in fact, different species. Middle Tennessee State University, Department of Biology, PO Box 60, Murfreesboro Tennessee 37132 The association between ITS haplotype divergence of less than 5% (Armillaria mellea 5 2.6% excluding Kendra Baumgartner gaps; Amanita citrina f. lavendula 5 3.3%) with the USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Department of presence of putative recombinants and greater than Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, California 95616 5% (Gymnopus dichrous 5 5.7%; Hygrocybe flavescens/ chlorophana 5 14.1%) with apparent failure of F1 2 Rodham E. Tulloss hybrids to produce F2 or higher progeny in popula- PO Box 57, Roosevelt, New Jersey 08555-0057 tions may suggest a correlation between genetic Edgar Lickey distance and reproductive isolation.
    [Show full text]
  • Milk Thistle
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control BIOLOGY AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF EXOTIC T RU E T HISTL E S RACHEL WINSTON , RICH HANSEN , MA R K SCH W A R ZLÄNDE R , ER IC COO M BS , CA R OL BELL RANDALL , AND RODNEY LY M FHTET-2007-05 U.S. Department Forest September 2008 of Agriculture Service FHTET he Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 Tby the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ On the cover: Italian thistle. Photo: ©Saint Mary’s College of California. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for information only and does not constitute an endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Ecology of the Exotic Dune Grass Leymus Arenarius
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2018 Soil ecology of the exotic dune grass Leymus arenarius. Matthew L. Reid University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the Botany Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Reid, Matthew L., "Soil ecology of the exotic dune grass Leymus arenarius." (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2995. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/2995 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SOIL ECOLOGY OF THE EXOTIC DUNE GRASS LEYMUS ARENARIUS By Matthew L. Reid B.A. Hendrix College, 2009 M.S. University of Louisiana at Monroe, 2013 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology Department of Biology University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky May 2018 SOIL ECOLOGY OF THE EXOTIC DUNE GRASS LEYMUS ARENARIUS By Matthew L. Reid B.A. Hendrix College, 2009 M.S. University
    [Show full text]
  • Discharge Limit Violations and Compliance Report
    Discharge Limit Violations and Compliance Report Water Quality Permitted Facilities For the Period January 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999 January 2001 Publication Number 01-10-005 Discharge Limit Violations and Compliance Report Water Quality Permitted Facilities For the Period January 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999 Prepared by: Washington State Department of Ecology Water Quality Program For more information, please contact Stephen Bernath (360) 407-6459 Email: [email protected] January 2001 Publication Number 01-10-005 For additional copies of this document contact: Department of Ecology Publications Distribution Center P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 Telephone: (360) 407-7472 The Department of Ecology is an equal opportunity agency and does not discriminate on the basis of race, creed, color, disability, age, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, disabled veteran's status, Vietnam Era veteran's status, or sexual orientation. If you have special accommodation needs or require this document in an alternative format, please call Donna Lynch at (360) 407-7529. The TDD number is (306) 407-6006. Email can be sent to [email protected]. Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Graphs............................................................................................................................................ 3 1999 Industrial Facilities............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION Cooperstown, New York
    BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION Cooperstown, New York 50th ANNUAL REPORT 2017 Photo credit: Holly Waterfield STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK COLLEGE AT ONEONTA OCCASIONAL PAPERS PUBLISHED BY THE BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION No. 1. The diet and feeding habits of the terrestrial stage of the common newt, Notophthalmus viridescens (Raf.). M.C. MacNamara, April 1976 No. 2. The relationship of age, growth and food habits to the relative success of the whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) and the cisco (C. artedi) in Otsego Lake, New York. A.J. Newell, April 1976. No. 3. A basic limnology of Otsego Lake (Summary of research 1968-75). W. N. Harman and L. P. Sohacki, June 1976. No. 4. An ecology of the Unionidae of Otsego Lake with special references to the immature stages. G. P. Weir, November 1977. No. 5. A history and description of the Biological Field Station (1966-1977). W. N. Harman, November 1977. No. 6. The distribution and ecology of the aquatic molluscan fauna of the Black River drainage basin in northern New York. D. E Buckley, April 1977. No. 7. The fishes of Otsego Lake. R. C. MacWatters, May 1980. No. 8. The ecology of the aquatic macrophytes of Rat Cove, Otsego Lake, N.Y. F. A Vertucci, W. N. Harman and J. H. Peverly, December 1981. No. 9. Pictorial keys to the aquatic mollusks of the upper Susquehanna. W. N. Harman, April 1982. No. 10. The dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata: Anisoptera and Zygoptera) of Otsego County, New York with illustrated keys to the genera and species. L.S. House III, September 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Clatsop, Lewis and Clark's 1805-1806 Winter Establishment "Living History" Demonstrations Feature for Visitors to National Park Facility
    T HE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE LEWIS & CLARK T RAIL H ERITAGE FOUNDATION, INC. VOL. 12, NO. 3 AUGUST 1986 Fort Clatsop, Lewis and Clark's 1805-1806 Winter Establishment "Living History" Demonstrations Feature for Visitors to National Park Facility Photograph by Andrew E. Cier, Astoria, Oregon Replica of Fort Clatsop, Near Astoria, Oregon - See Story on Page 3 - President Wang's THE LEWIS AND CLARK TRAIL Message HERITAGE FOUNDATION, INC. Thank you's are due at least four Incorporated 1969 under Missouri General Not-For-Profit Corporation Act IRS Exemption different groups of Foundation Certificate No. 501(C)(3) - I dentification No. 51-0187715 members for the efforts put forth by them these past twelve months. OFFICERS - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE First, I am most thankful for the President 1st Vice President 2nd Vice President excellent support that has been L. Edw in Wang John E. Foote H. John Montague provided by Foundation officers, 6013 St . Johns Ave. 1205 Rimhaven Way 2864 Sudbury Ct. directors, past presidents, and all M inneapolis. MN 55424 Billings. MT 591 02 Marietta. GA'30062 other committee members. Second, I am much indebted to the 1986 Edrie Lee Vinson. Secretary John E. Walker. Treasurer P.O. Box 1651 200 Market St .. Suite 1177 Program Committee, headed by Red Lodge. MT 59068 Portland. OR 97201 Malcolm Buffum, for the tre­ mendous effort they have put forth Ruth E. Lange, Membership Secretary. 5054 S.W. 26th Place. Port land. OR 97201 to arrange one of the finest-ever annual meeting programs. Third, I DIRECTORS am so grateful for all that is ac­ Harold Billian Winifred C.
    [Show full text]