DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Name ___SOLUTIONS___CE3501

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Name ____SOLUTIONS________________________ CE3501 FUNDAMENTALS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY 1-hr in-class Exam A list of equations is given on the last page of the exam. True-False – put a check in the appropriate space: (2 pts each) 1. In most ecosystems, the rate of photosynthesis nearly equals the rate of respiration. TRUE ___X_______ FALSE _____________ 2. Combustion of fossil fuels disrupts the global nitrogen cycle primarily by oxidizing organic nitrogen to N2. TRUE ____________ FALSE _____X________ 3. Eutrophication can occur naturally in lakes. TRUE _____X_____ FALSE _____________ 4. The communities around deep sea thermal vents are supported by energy first captured and converted to organic matter by chemoautotrophs or lithotrophs. TRUE ______X____ FALSE _____________ 5. The nutrient most often limiting in freshwater lakes is oxygen. TRUE ____________ FALSE ____X_________ 6. Eutrophic or nutrient-rich conditions promote the existence of complex food webs. TRUE ____________ FALSE _____X________ Indicate (circle or cross out) the one that does NOT match: (3 pts each) 7a. Lithotroph b. Chemosynthetic c. Chemoautotroph d. Nitrification e. Sulfate reduction 8a. Electron acceptor b. Oxygen c. Sulfate d. Methane e. Iron oxide 1 9a. Electron donor b. Organic matter c. Nitrate d. Ammonia e. Sulfide 10a. Herbivore b. Primary consumer c. Vegetarian d. Heterotroph e. Omnivore Short answer: (fill in the blanks): 11-13. What are the three most important functions of sewage treatment plants? (3 pts each) REMOVAL OF PATHOGENS REMOVAL OF BOD REMOVAL OF NUTRIENTS 14. Match the following lists of words by putting on the line next to each numbered term, all of the letters from the second column that could possibly correspond to that numbered term. (14 pts) 1. Protozoa _c,f,e,(g,d,a) a. Secondary consumer 2. Algae __b,(c) b. Primary producer 3. Virus _c______ c. Pathogen 4. Microcrustacean _a,d,e,f,g d. Herbivore 5. Macrophyte _b________ e. Zooplankton 6. Fish __a,d,f,g f. Heterotrophic 7. Fungi __f,(c,a)_ g. Carnivore 15. Nitrogen is removed from wastewater through the anaerobic conversion of nitrate to nitrogen gas. What is the name of this process? (4 pts) _____DENITRIFICATION 16. All of the bass, pike, perch, and walleye in a lake might comprise the fish __?__ ____COMMUNITY (POPULATION also accepted) (4 pts) 2 17. Balance the following redox reactions (4 pts each) 2- H2S + O2 Î S2O3 + H2O - 2- + OH + 2H2S + 2O2 Î S2O3 + 2H2O + H C6H6 + O2 Î CO2 + H2O C6H6 + 7.5O2 Î 6CO2 + 3H2O 18. A tank truck full of industrial waste is discovered abandoned on a highway. The waste is still warm and thus hasn’t been gone from the plant very long. A laboratory technician determines that the waste has a 5-day CBOD of 50 mg•L-1. There are three factories in the vicinity generating wastes with ultimate CBODs of 50 mg•L-1 (winery), 80 mg•L-1 (vinegar manufacturer), and 200 mg•L-1 (pharmaceutical plant). Identify the source of the waste and support your selection with calculations. The CBOD rate constant is 0.2 d-1. (15 pts) SOLUTION -1 You are given that Y5 = 50 mg/L, kL = 0.2 d . Calculate Lo to determine to which waste it is most similar. Lo = Y5/(1-exp(-0.2*5) = 79 mg/L This ultimate BOD is very similar to that of the vinegar manufacturer and would implicate that company as the source of the waste. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 19. Combined sewer overflow runoff associated with a severe summer storm resulted in the discharge of millions of gallons of untreated wastewater to an urban lake and led to the closing of bathing beaches. The public health standard for bacteria associated with contact recreation (swimming) is 200 cells·mL-1. Following the storm, bacterial concentrations in the lake were 10,000 cells·mL-1. Assuming first-order kinetics, with a decay constant of 0.5 d-1, determine how many days it will be before the beaches are re- opened. [10 points] SOLUTION: X = Xo exp(-kd*t) This would be the equation for the decay of the population t = (-1/kd)ln(X/Xo) = (-1/0.5)*ln(200/10,000) = 7.8 d ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 20. A population of microorganisms has a maximum specific growth rate coefficient equal to 0.45 d-1, a half saturation constant of 0.7 mg/m3 for phosphorus, and a respiration rate coefficient of 0.15 d-1. The phosphorus concentration is 0.3 mg/m3. a. Write the differential equation describing a mass balance for this population in a batch reactor (i.e. no inflow or outflow). (7 pts) SOLUTION: dX⎛⎞⎛⎞ S =−μ kX ⎜⎟max ⎜⎟d dt⎝⎠⎝⎠ S+ Ks b. Calculate the population size after 10 days if the initial population is 100 cells•mL-1. Assume that the phosphorus concentration is maintained constant. (10 pts) SOLUTION: ⎛⎞⎛⎞S μ −kt ⎜⎟max ⎜⎟d ⎝⎠⎝⎠KSS + XXe= 0 ⎛⎞⎛⎞mg 0.3 cells ⎜⎟⎜⎟3 X =⋅100 exp⎜⎟ 0.45ddd−−11m − 0.15 10 ⎜⎟mg mg mL ⎜⎟⎜⎟ ⎜⎟0.333+ 0.7 ⎝⎠⎝⎠mm cells X = 86 mL 4.
Recommended publications
  • Backyard Food

    Backyard Food

    Suggested Grades: 2nd - 5th BACKYARD FOOD WEB Wildlife Champions at Home Science Experiment 2-LS4-1: Make observations of plants and animals to compare the diversity of life in different habitats. What is a food web? All living things on earth are either producers, consumers or decomposers. Producers are organisms that create their own food through the process of photosynthesis. Photosynthesis is when a living thing uses sunlight, water and nutrients from the soil to create its food. Most plants are producers. Consumers get their energy by eating other living things. Consumers can be either herbivores (eat only plants – like deer), carnivores (eat only meat – like wolves) or omnivores (eat both plants and meat - like humans!) Decomposers are organisms that get their energy by eating dead plants or animals. After a living thing dies, decomposers will break down the body and turn it into nutritious soil for plants to use. Mushrooms, worms and bacteria are all examples of decomposers. A food web is a picture that shows how energy (food) passes through an ecosystem. The easiest way to build a food web is by starting with the producers. Every ecosystem has plants that make their own food through photosynthesis. These plants are eaten by herbivorous consumers. These herbivores are then hunted by carnivorous consumers. Eventually, these carnivores die of illness or old age and become food for decomposers. As decomposers break down the carnivore’s body, they create delicious nutrients in the soil which plants will use to live and grow! When drawing a food web, it is important to show the flow of energy (food) using arrows.
  • ORGANIC GEOCHEMISTRY: CHALLENGES for the 21St CENTURY

    ORGANIC GEOCHEMISTRY: CHALLENGES for the 21St CENTURY

    ORGANIC GEOCHEMISTRY: CHALLENGES FOR THE 21st CENTURY VOL. 2 Book of Abstracts of the Communications presented to the 22nd International Meeting on Organic Geochemistry Seville – Spain. September 12 -16, 2005 Editors: F.J. González-Vila, J.A. González-Pérez and G. Almendros Equipo de trabajo: Rocío González Vázquez Antonio Terán Rodíguez José Mª de la Rosa Arranz Maquetación: Rocío González Vázquez Fotomecánica e impresión: Akron Gráfica, Sevilla © 22nd IMOG, Sevilla 2005 Depósito legal: SE-61181-2005 I.S.B.N.: 84-689-3661-8 COMMITTEES INVOLVED IN THE ORGANIZATION OF THE 22 IMOG 2005 Chairman: Francisco J. GONZÁLEZ-VILA Vice-Chairman: José A. GONZÁLEZ-PÉREZ Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Sevilla (IRNAS) Scientific Committee Francisco J. GONZÁLEZ-VILA (Chairman) IRNAS-CSIC, Spain Gonzalo ALMENDROS Claude LARGEAU CCMA-CSIC, Spain ENSC, France Pim van BERGEN José C. del RÍO SHELL Global Solutions, The Netherlands IRNAS-CSIC, Spain Jørgen A. BOJESEN-KOEFOED Jürgen RULLKÖTTER GEUS, Denmark ICBM, Germany Chris CORNFORD Stefan SCHOUTEN IGI, UK NIOZ, The Netherlands Gary ISAKSEN Eugenio VAZ dos SANTOS NETO EXXONMOBIL, USA PETROBRAS RD, Brazil Local Committee José Ramón de ANDRÉS IGME, Spain Mª Carmen DORRONSORO Mª Enriqueta ARIAS Universidad del País Vasco Universidad de Alcalá Antonio GUERRERO Tomasz BOSKI Universidad de Sevilla Universidad do Algarve, Faro, Portugal Juan LLAMAS Ignacio BRISSON ETSI Minas de Madrid Repsol YPF Albert PERMANYER Juan COTA Universidad de Barcelona Universidad de Sevilla EAOG Board Richard L. PATIENCE (Chairman) Sylvie DERENNE (Secretary) Ger W. van GRAAS (Treasurer) Walter MICHAELIS (Awards) Francisco J. GONZALEZ-VILA (Newsletter) C.
  • Effects of Human Disturbance on Terrestrial Apex Predators

    Effects of Human Disturbance on Terrestrial Apex Predators

    diversity Review Effects of Human Disturbance on Terrestrial Apex Predators Andrés Ordiz 1,2,* , Malin Aronsson 1,3, Jens Persson 1 , Ole-Gunnar Støen 4, Jon E. Swenson 2 and Jonas Kindberg 4,5 1 Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-730 91 Riddarhyttan, Sweden; [email protected] (M.A.); [email protected] (J.P.) 2 Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Postbox 5003, NO-1432 Ås, Norway; [email protected] 3 Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden 4 Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, NO-7485 Trondheim, Norway; [email protected] (O.-G.S.); [email protected] (J.K.) 5 Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83 Umeå, Sweden * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The effects of human disturbance spread over virtually all ecosystems and ecological communities on Earth. In this review, we focus on the effects of human disturbance on terrestrial apex predators. We summarize their ecological role in nature and how they respond to different sources of human disturbance. Apex predators control their prey and smaller predators numerically and via behavioral changes to avoid predation risk, which in turn can affect lower trophic levels. Crucially, reducing population numbers and triggering behavioral responses are also the effects that human disturbance causes to apex predators, which may in turn influence their ecological role. Some populations continue to be at the brink of extinction, but others are partially recovering former ranges, via natural recolonization and through reintroductions.
  • Thermophilic Lithotrophy and Phototrophy in an Intertidal, Iron-Rich, Geothermal Spring 2 3 Lewis M

    Thermophilic Lithotrophy and Phototrophy in an Intertidal, Iron-Rich, Geothermal Spring 2 3 Lewis M

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/428698; this version posted September 27, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Thermophilic Lithotrophy and Phototrophy in an Intertidal, Iron-rich, Geothermal Spring 2 3 Lewis M. Ward1,2,3*, Airi Idei4, Mayuko Nakagawa2,5, Yuichiro Ueno2,5,6, Woodward W. 4 Fischer3, Shawn E. McGlynn2* 5 6 1. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA 7 2. Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro, Tokyo, 152-8550, Japan 8 3. Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 9 91125 USA 10 4. Department of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, 11 Japan 12 5. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro, Tokyo, 13 152-8551, Japan 14 6. Department of Subsurface Geobiological Analysis and Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth 15 Science and Technology, Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan 16 Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] 17 18 Abstract 19 Hydrothermal systems, including terrestrial hot springs, contain diverse and systematic 20 arrays of geochemical conditions that vary over short spatial scales due to progressive interaction 21 between the reducing hydrothermal fluids, the oxygenated atmosphere, and in some cases 22 seawater. At Jinata Onsen, on Shikinejima Island, Japan, an intertidal, anoxic, iron- and 23 hydrogen-rich hot spring mixes with the oxygenated atmosphere and sulfate-rich seawater over 24 short spatial scales, creating an enormous range of redox environments over a distance ~10 m.
  • Seventh Grade

    Seventh Grade

    Name: _____________________ Maui Ocean Center Learning Worksheet Seventh Grade Our mission is to foster understanding, wonder and respect for Hawai‘i’s Marine Life. Based on benchmarks SC.6.3.1, SC. 7.3.1, SC. 7.3.2, SC. 7.5.4 Maui Ocean Center SEVENTH GRADE 1 Interdependent Relationships Relationships A food web (or chain) shows how each living thing gets its food. Some animals eat plants and some animals eat other animals. For example, a simple food chain links plants, cows (that eat plants), and humans (that eat cows). Each link in this chain is food for the next link. A food chain always starts with plant life and ends with an animal. Plants are called producers (they are also autotrophs) because they are able to use light energy from the sun to produce food (sugar) from carbon dioxide and water. Animals cannot make their own food so they must eat plants and/or other animals. They are called consumers (they are also heterotrophs). There are three groups of consumers. Animals that eat only plants are called herbivores. Animals that eat other animals are called carnivores. Animals and people who eat both animals and plants are called omnivores. Decomposers (bacteria and fungi) feed on decaying matter. These decomposers speed up the decaying process that releases minerals back into the food chain for absorption by plants as nutrients. Do you know why there are more herbivores than carnivores? In a food chain, energy is passed from one link to another. When a herbivore eats, only a fraction of the energy (that it gets from the plant food) becomes new body mass; the rest of the energy is lost as waste or used up (by the herbivore as it moves).
  • Plants Are Producers! Draw the Different Producers Below

    Plants Are Producers! Draw the Different Producers Below

    Name: ______________________________ The Unique Producer Every food chain begins with a producer. Plants are producers. They make their own food, which creates energy for them to grow, reproduce and survive. Being able to make their own food makes them unique; they are the only living things on Earth that can make their own source of food energy. Of course, they require sun, water and air to thrive. Given these three essential ingredients, you will have a healthy plant to begin the food chain. All plants are producers! Draw the different producers below. Apple Tree Rose Bushes Watermelon Grasses Plant Blueberry Flower Fern Daisy Bush List the three essential needs that every producer must have in order to live. © 2009 by Heather Motley Name: ______________________________ Producers can make their own food and energy, but consumers are different. Living things that have to hunt, gather and eat their food are called consumers. Consumers have to eat to gain energy or they will die. There are four types of consumers: omnivores, carnivores, herbivores and decomposers. Herbivores are living things that only eat plants to get the food and energy they need. Animals like whales, elephants, cows, pigs, rabbits, and horses are herbivores. Carnivores are living things that only eat meat. Animals like owls, tigers, sharks and cougars are carnivores. You would not catch a plant in these animals’ mouths. Then, we have the omnivores. Omnivores will eat both plants and animals to get energy. Whichever food source is abundant or available is what they will eat. Animals like the brown bear, dogs, turtles, raccoons and even some people are omnivores.
  • Nile Tilapia and Milkfish in the Philippines

    Nile Tilapia and Milkfish in the Philippines

    FAO ISSN 2070-7010 FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE TECHNICAL PAPER 614 Better management practices for feed production and management of Nile tilapia and milkfish in the Philippines Cover photographs: Top left: Harvest of milkfish in Panabo Mariculture Park, Panabo City, Davao, Philippines (courtesy of FAO/Thomas A. Shipton). Top right: Harvest of Nile tilapia in Taal Lake in the province of Batangas, the Philippines (courtesy of FAO/Mohammad R. Hasan). Bottom: A view of cage and pen culture of milkfish in a large brackishwater pond, Dagupan, Philippines. (courtesy of FAO/Mohammad R. Hasan). Cover design: Mohammad R. Hasan and Koen Ivens. FAO FISHERIES AND Better management practices AQUACULTURE TECHNICAL for feed production and PAPER management of Nile tilapia 614 and milkfish in the Philippines by Patrick G. White FAO Consultant Crest, France Thomas A. Shipton FAO Consultant Grahamstown, South Africa Pedro B. Bueno FAO Consultant Bangkok, Thailand and Mohammad R. Hasan Aquaculture Officer Aquaculture Branch FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Rome, Italy FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2018 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
  • Nicole Kube Phd

    Nicole Kube Phd

    Leibniz-Institut für Meereswissenschaften The integration of microalgae photobioreactors in a recirculation system for low water discharge mariculture Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät an der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel vorgelegt von Nicole Kube Kiel, 2006 Referentin: Prof. Dr. Karin Lochte Koreferent: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Harald Rosenthal Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: Zum Druck genehmigt: Kiel, den Der Dekan Foreword The manuscripts included in this thesis are prepared for submission to peer- reviewed journals as listed below: Wecker B., Kube N., Bischoff A.A., Waller U. (2006). MARE – Marine Artificial Recirculated Ecosystem: feasibility and modelling of a novel integrated recirculation system. (manuscript) Kube N., Bischoff A.A., Wecker B., Waller U. Cultivation of microalgae using a continuous photobioreactor system based on dissolved nutrients of a recirculation system for low water discharge mariculture (manuscript) Kube N. And Rosenthal H. Ozonation and foam fractionation used for the removal of bacteria and parti- cles in a marine recirculation system for microalgae cultivation (manuscript) Kube N., Bischoff A.A., Blümel M., Wecker B., Waller U. MARE – Marine Artificial Recirulated Ecosystem II: Influence on the nitrogen cycle in a marine recirculation system with low water discharge by cultivat- ing detritivorous organisms and phototrophic microalgae. (manuscript) This thesis has been realised with the help of several collegues. The contributions in particular
  • An Ecological Framework for Contextualizing Carnivore–Livestock Conflict

    An Ecological Framework for Contextualizing Carnivore–Livestock Conflict

    Special Section Review An ecological framework for contextualizing carnivore–livestock conflict Christine E. Wilkinson ,1 ∗ Alex McInturff,1 Jennifer R. B. Miller,1,2 Veronica Yovovich,1 Kaitlyn M. Gaynor,1 Kendall Calhoun,1 Harshad Karandikar,1 Jeff Vance Martin,3 Phoebe Parker-Shames,1 Avery Shawler,1 Amy Van Scoyoc,1 and Justin S. Brashares1 1Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, 139 Mulford Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, U.S.A. 2Defenders of Wildlife, 1130 17th St. NW, Washington DC, 20036, U.S.A. 3Department of Geography, University of California, 505 McCone Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, U.S.A. Abstract: Carnivore predation on livestock is a complex management and policy challenge, yet it is also intrinsi- cally an ecological interaction between predators and prey. Human–wildlife interactions occur in socioecological systems in which human and environmental processes are closely linked. However, underlying human–wildlife conflict and key to unpacking its complexity are concrete and identifiable ecological mechanisms that lead to predation events. To better understand how ecological theory accords with interactions between wild predators and domestic prey, we developed a framework to describe ecological drivers of predation on livestock. We based this framework on foundational ecological theory and current research on interactions between predators and domestic prey. We used this framework to examine ecological mechanisms (e.g., density-mediated effects, behaviorally mediated effects, and optimal foraging theory) through which specific management interventions operate, and we analyzed the ecological determinants of failure and success of management interventions in 3 case studies: snow leopards (Panthera uncia), wolves (Canis lupus), and cougars (Puma concolor).
  • Herbivore Physiological Response to Predation Risk and Implications for Ecosystem Nutrient Dynamics

    Herbivore Physiological Response to Predation Risk and Implications for Ecosystem Nutrient Dynamics

    Herbivore physiological response to predation risk and implications for ecosystem nutrient dynamics Dror Hawlena and Oswald J. Schmitz1 School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511 Communicated by Thomas W. Schoener, University of California, Davis, CA, June 29, 2010 (received for review January 4, 2010) The process of nutrient transfer throughan ecosystem is an important lower the quantity of energy that can be allocated to production determinant of production, food-chain length, and species diversity. (20–23). Consequently, stress-induced constraints on herbivore The general view is that the rate and efficiency of nutrient transfer up production should lower the demand for N-rich proteins (24). the food chain is constrained by herbivore-specific capacity to secure Herbivores also have low capacity to store excess nutrients (24), N-rich compounds for survival and production. Using feeding trials and hence should seek plants with high digestible carbohydrate with artificial food, we show, however, that physiological stress- content to minimize the costs of ingesting and excreting excess N. response of grasshopper herbivores to spider predation risk alters the Such stress-induced shift in nutrient demand may be especially nature of the nutrient constraint. Grasshoppers facing predation risk important in terrestrial systems in which digestible carbohydrate had higher metabolic rates than control grasshoppers. Elevated represents a small fraction of total plant carbohydrate-C, and may metabolism accordingly increased requirements for dietary digestible be limiting even under risk-free conditions (25). Moreover, stress carbohydrate-C to fuel-heightened energy demands. Moreover, di- responses include break down of body proteins to produce glucose gestible carbohydrate-C comprises a small fraction of total plant (i.e., gluconeogenesis) (14), which requires excretion of N-rich tissue-C content, so nutrient transfer between plants and herbivores waste compounds (ammonia or primary amines) (26).
  • Nutrient Control Design Manual: State of Technology Review Report,” Were

    Nutrient Control Design Manual: State of Technology Review Report,” Were

    United States Office of Research and EPA/600/R‐09/012 Environmental Protection Development January 2009 Agency Washington, DC 20460 Nutrient Control Design Manual State of Technology Review Report EPA/600/R‐09/012 January 2009 Nutrient Control Design Manual State of Technology Review Report by The Cadmus Group, Inc 57 Water Street Watertown, MA 02472 Scientific, Technical, Research, Engineering, and Modeling Support (STREAMS) Task Order 68 Contract No. EP‐C‐05‐058 George T. Moore, Task Order Manager United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development / National Risk Management Research Laboratory 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Mail Code 445 Cincinnati, Ohio, 45268 Notice This document was prepared by The Cadmus Group, Inc. (Cadmus) under EPA Contract No. EP‐C‐ 05‐058, Task Order 68. The Cadmus Team was lead by Patricia Hertzler and Laura Dufresne with Senior Advisors Clifford Randall, Emeritus Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech and Director of the Occoquan Watershed Monitoring Program; James Barnard, Global Practice and Technology Leader at Black & Veatch; David Stensel, Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Washington; and Jeanette Brown, Executive Director of the Stamford Water Pollution Control Authority and Adjunct Professor of Environmental Engineering at Manhattan College. Disclaimer The views expressed in this document are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily, reflect the views and policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. This document has been reviewed in accordance with EPA’s peer and administrative review policies and approved for publication.
  • AP Biology Flash Review Is Designed to Help Howyou Prepare to Use Forthis and Book Succeed on the AP Biology Exam

    AP Biology Flash Review Is Designed to Help Howyou Prepare to Use Forthis and Book Succeed on the AP Biology Exam

    * . .AP . BIOLOGY. Flash review APBIOL_00_ffirs_i-iv.indd 1 12/20/12 9:54 AM OTHER TITLES OF INTEREST FROM LEARNINGEXPRESS AP* U.S. History Flash Review ACT * Flash Review APBIOL_00_ffirs_i-iv.indd 2 12/20/12 9:54 AM AP* BIOLOGY . Flash review ® N EW YORK APBIOL_00_ffirs_i-iv.indd 3 12/20/12 9:54 AM The content in this book has been reviewed and updated by the LearningExpress Team in 2016. Copyright © 2012 LearningExpress, LLC. All rights reserved under International and Pan American Copyright Conventions. Published in the United States by LearningExpress, LLC, New York. Printed in the United States of America 987654321 First Edition ISBN 978-1-57685-921-6 For more information or to place an order, contact LearningExpress at: 2 Rector Street 26th Floor New York, NY 10006 Or visit us at: www.learningexpressllc.com *AP is a registered trademark of the College Board, which was not involved in the production of, and does not endorse, this product. APBIOL_00_ffirs_i-iv.indd 4 12/20/12 9:54 AM Contents 1 . .. 11 IntRoDUCtIon 57 . ... A. 73 . ... B. 131 . ... C. 151 . .... D. 175 . .... e. 183 . .... F. 205 . .... G. 225 . .... H. 245 . .... I. 251 . .... K. 267 . .... L. 305 . .... M. [ v ] . .... n. APBIOL_00_fcont_v-viii.indd 5 12/20/12 9:55 AM 329 343 . .... o. 411 . .... P. 413 . .... Q. 437 . .... R. 489 . .... s. 533 . .... t. 533 . .... U. 539 . .... V. 541 . .... X. .... Z. [ vi ] APBIOL_00_fcont_v-viii.indd 6 12/20/12 9:55 AM * . .AP . BIOLOGY. FLAsH.ReVIew APBIOL_00_fcont_v-viii.indd 7 12/20/12 9:55 AM Blank Page 8 APBIOL_00_fcont_v-viii.indd 8 12/20/12 9:55 AM IntroductIon The AP Biology exam tests students’ knowledge Aboutof core themes, the AP topics, Biology and concepts Exam covered in a typical high school AP Biology course, which offers students the opportunity to engage in college-level biology study.