DOCSLIB.ORG

Analysis of a Hydrological Modelling Tool for Water Resources Management in the Valles River Basin, Mexico

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analysis of a Hydrological Modelling Tool for Water Resources Management in the Valles River Basin, Mexico UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE SAN LUIS POTOSÍ FACULTADES DE CIENCIAS QUÍMICAS, INGENIERÍA Y MEDICINA PROGRAMAS MULTIDISCIPLINARIOS DE POSGRADO EN CIENCIAS AMBIENTALES AND COLOGNE UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGY AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE TROPICS AND SUBTROPICS ANALYSIS OF A HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING TOOL FOR WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE VALLES RIVER BASIN, MEXICO THESIS TO OBTAIN THE DEGREE OF MAESTRÍA EN CIENCIAS AMBIENTALES DEGREE AWARDED BY UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE SAN LUIS POTOSÍ AND MASTER OF SCIENCE “TECHNOLOGY AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE TROPICS AND SUBTROPICS FOCUS AREA “ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT” DEGREE AWARDED BY COLOGNE UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES PRESENTS: FABIÁN DARÍO COTE NAVARRO CO-DIRECTOR OF THESIS PMPCA DRA. MARÍA GUADALUPE GALINDO MENDOZA CO-DIRECTOR OF THESIS ITT: PROF. DR. LARS RIBBE ASSESSOR: DR. MAXIME SOUVIGNET SAN LUIS POTOSÍ, MÉXICO SEPTEMBER 2011 SAN LUIS POTOSÍ, MÉXICO OR COLOGNE, GERMANY DATE UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE SAN LUIS POTOSÍ FACULTADES DE CIENCIAS QUÍMICAS, INGENIERÍA Y MEDICINA PROGRAMAS MULTIDISCIPLINARIOS DE POSGRADO EN CIENCIAS AMBIENTALES AND COLOGNE UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGY AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE TROPICS AND SUBTROPICS ANALYSIS OF A HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING TOOL FOR WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE VALLES RIVER BASIN, MEXICO THESIS TO OBTAIN THE DEGREE OF MAESTRÍA EN CIENCIAS AMBIENTALES DEGREE AWARDED BY UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE SAN LUIS POTOSÍ AND MASTER OF SCIENCE “TECHNOLOGY AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE TROPICS AND SUBTROPICS FOCUS AREA “ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT” DEGREE AWARDED BY COLOGNE UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES PRESENTS: FABIÁN DARÍO COTE NAVARRO DRA. MARÍA GUADALUPE GALINDO MENDOZA PROF. DR. LARS RIBBE DR. MAXIME SOUVIGNET SAN LUIS POTOSÍ, MÉXICO SEPTEMBER 2011 SAN LUIS POTOSÍ, MÉXICO OR COLOGNE, GERMANY DATE PROYECTO FINANCIADO POR: SISTEMA NACIONAL DE VIGILANCIA EPIDEMIOLÓGICA -SINAVEF PROYECTO REALIZADO EN: PMPCA - UASLP AGENDA AMBIENTAL UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE SAN LUIS POTOSÍ INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGY AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE TROPICS AND SUBTROPICS COLOGNE UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES CON EL APOYO DE: DEUTSCHER AKADEMISCHER AUSTAUSCH DIENST (DAAD) CONSEJO NACIONAL DE CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGÍA (CONACYT) LA MAESTRÍA EN CIENCIAS AMBIENTALES RECIBE APOYO A TRAVÉS DEL PROGRAMA NACIONAL DE POSGRADOS (PNPC - CONACYT) Erklärung / Declaración Name / Nombre: Fabián Darío Cote Navarro Matri.-Nr. / N° de matricula: 11074529 (CUAS), 0180189 (UASLP) Ich versichere wahrheitsgemäß, dass ich die vorliegende Masterarbeit selbstständig verfasst und keine anderen als die von mir angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel benutzt habe. Alle Stellen, die wörtlich oder sinngemäß aus veröffentlichten und nicht veröffentlichten Schriften entnommen sind, sind als solche kenntlich gemacht. Aseguro que yo redacté la presente tesis de maestría independientemente y no use referencias ni medios auxiliares a parte de los indicados. Todas las partes, que están referidas a escritos o a textos publicados o no publicados son reconocidas como tales. Die Arbeit ist in gleicher oder ähnlicher Form noch nicht als Prüfungsarbeit eingereicht worden. Hasta la fecha, un trabajo como éste o similar no ha sido entregado como trabajo de tesis. San Luis Potosí, den /el ________________ Unterschrift / Firma: ______________ Ich erkläre mich mit einer späteren Veröffentlichung meiner Masterarbeit sowohl auszugsweise, als auch Gesamtwerk in der Institutsreihe oder zu Darstellungszwecken im Rahmen der Öffentlichkeitsarbeit des Institutes einverstanden. Estoy de acuerdo con una publicación posterior de mi tesis de maestría en forma completa o parcial por las instituciones con la intención de exponerlos en el contexto del trabajo investigación de las mismas. Unterschrift / Firma: __________________ Acknowledgements I dedicate the efforts made for this work to my family, my mother, father, sister and brother, who have always loved me and believed in me without asking anything in return. They have always been there for me to give all their support and wisdom, especially during hard times. For them, all of my love. The experience of the master program and the elaboration of this thesis wouldn’t have been possible without the financial support from the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) in Mexico and the Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD) in Germany, whom I thank for allowing one of the best experiences of my life. I extend my gratitude also to the Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí and the Fachhochshule Köln for giving me the opportunity to take this master program. Among the staff of the two universities I would like to thank my tutor committee: to Dr. Maria Guadalupe Galindo for her demanding attitude, to Prof. Dr. Lars Ribbe for his guidance and, especially, to Dr. Maxime Souvignet for his enthusiasm and constant support for the modelling process. I give special thanks to some professors who supported me somehow: Dr. Carlos Contreras Servín, Dr. Javier Fortanelli Martínez, Dr. Juan Carlos García and Dr. Jackon Roehrig, mostly for their supportive and encouraging attitude. Sincere thanks to the coordination and administrative staff of both universities, especially to Dr. María Deogracias Ortiz for her hard work. I’d also like to acknowledge the support I received from other people, like the SINAVEF staff from whom I got technical support and important information, to Noé Aguilar, also Mr. Melquiades de León in Ejido Laguna del Mante, Dr. Oscar Osmín Meraz from Fundación PRODUCE in Ciudad Valles and the people from El Estribo research centre in El Naranjo for their support during field visits and the information given. I’m also very grateful with my master fellows, my roommates and all the people who made this stage of my life even more special. To the Mexican people, all my gratitude for your kindness. INDEX ABSTRACT - 11 - RESUMEN - 12 - ZUSAMMENFASSUNG - 13 - 1. INTRODUCTION - 13 - 1.1. RESEARCH PROBLEM STATEMENT - 14 - 1.2. OBJECTIVES - 18 - 1.3. JUSTIFICATION - 18 - 1.4. ANTECEDENTS - 20 - 2. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK - 25 - 2.1. WATER CYCLE, HYDROLOGY AND WATERSHEDS - 25 - 2.2. WATERSHED AND WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT - 27 - 2.3. HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING - 30 - 2.4. LAND USE / LAND COVER AND WATERSHED HYDROLOGY 44 3. THE VALLES RIVER BASIN 50 3.1. HYDROGRAPHY 50 3.2. SOCIOECONOMICAL CONTEXT 52 3.3. CLIMATE 55 3.4. GEOLOGY 62 3.5. VEGETATION AND LAND USE 63 3.6. SOILS 75 3.7. WATER ISSUES IN THE VALLES RIVER BASIN 78 4. METHODOLOGY 81 4.1. MORPHOMETRICS 81 4.2. MODEL SET UP 83 4.3. MODEL CALIBRATION 100 4.4. SIMULATION OF LAND USE/LAND COVER CHANGE EFFECTS 105 5. RESULTS 107 5.1. MORPHOMETRICS 107 5.2. PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF THE WATERSHED’S HYDROLOGY 107 5.3. MODEL CALIBRATION 112 6. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS 118 6.1. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION 118 6.2. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 127 REFERENCES 131 ANNEX 1 141 ANNEX 2 143 ANNEX 2 145 FIGURES INDEX Figure 2.1: Water cycle scheme.....................................................................................................26 Figure 2.2: Classification of hydrologic models...............................................................................32 Figure 2.3: Schematic representation of the hydrologic cycle as conceptualized in SWAT..............37 Figure 3.1: Location of the Valles river basin....................................................................................50 Figure 3.2: Hydrography of the Valles River basin.......................................................................51 Figure 3.3: Longitudinal profile of the Valles River basin...............................................................52 Figure 3.4: Cross-sectional profile of the Valles River basin...........................................................52 Figure 3.5: Localities in the VRB by population size........................................................................53 Figure 3.6: Climate units of the Valles River basin according to INEGI..........................................56 Figure 3.7: Climate units of the Valles River basin according to Hernández (2007)..........................56 Figure 3.8: Climatic diagram of San Juan del Meco station.............................................................57 Figure 3.9: Climatic diagram of Abritas station..............................................................................57 Figure 3.10: Climatic diagram of El Tigre station...........................................................................57 Figure 3.11: Climatic diagram of Santa Rosa station......................................................................57 Figure 3.12: Evolution of the Drought Severity Index in the Huasteca Potosina (Algara Siller, et al., 2009).........................................................................................................................................60 Figure 3.13: Geology map of the Valles River basin........................................................................62 Figure 3.14: Land Use and Land Cover map of the Valles River basin (2003)....................................63 Figure 3.15: Location of the Sierra del Abra Tanchipa Natural Protected Area...............................72 Figure 3.16: Growth of surface planted with sugarcane in the Huasteca Potosina (Aguilar Rivera, 2011).........................................................................................................................................74 Figure 3.17: Soils map of the Valles
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Phylogeny of the Hubbardochloinae Including Tetrachaete (Poaceae: Chloridoideae: Cynodonteae)
    Peterson, P.M., K. Romaschenko, and Y. Herrera Arrieta. 2020. A phylogeny of the Hubbardochloinae including Tetrachaete (Poaceae: Chloridoideae: Cynodonteae). Phytoneuron 2020-81: 1–13. Published 18 November 2020. ISSN 2153 733 A PHYLOGENY OF THE HUBBARDOCHLOINAE INCLUDING TETRACHAETE (CYNODONTEAE: CHLORIDOIDEAE: POACEAE) PAUL M. PETERSON AND KONSTANTIN ROMASCHENKO Department of Botany National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 [email protected]; [email protected] YOLANDA HERRERA ARRIETA Instituto Politécnico Nacional CIIDIR Unidad Durango-COFAA Durango, C.P. 34220, México [email protected] ABSTRACT The phylogeny of subtribe Hubbardochloinae is revisited, here with the inclusion of the monotypic genus Tetrachaete, based on a molecular DNA analysis using ndhA intron, rpl32-trnL, rps16 intron, rps16- trnK, and ITS markers. Tetrachaete elionuroides is aligned within the Hubbardochloinae and is sister to Dignathia. The biogeography of the Hubbardochloinae is discussed, its origin likely in Africa or temperate Asia. In a previous molecular DNA phylogeny (Peterson et al. 2016), the subtribe Hubbardochloinae Auquier [Bewsia Gooss., Dignathia Stapf, Gymnopogon P. Beauv., Hubbardochloa Auquier, Leptocarydion Hochst. ex Stapf, Leptothrium Kunth, and Lophacme Stapf] was found in a clade with moderate support (BS = 75, PP = 1.00) sister to the Farragininae P.M. Peterson et al. In the present study, Tetrachaete elionuroides Chiov. is included in a phylogenetic analysis (using ndhA intron, rpl32- trnL, rps16 intron, rps16-trnK, and ITS DNA markers) in order to test its relationships within the Cynodonteae with heavy sampling of species in the supersubtribe Gouiniodinae P.M. Peterson & Romasch. Chiovenda (1903) described Tetrachaete Chiov. with a with single species, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Cynodonteae Tribe
    POACEAE [GRAMINEAE] – GRASS FAMILY Plant: annuals or perennials Stem: jointed stem is termed a culm – internodial stem most often hollow but always solid at node, mostly round, some with stolons (creeping stem) or rhizomes (underground stem) Root: usually fibrous, often very abundant and dense Leaves: mostly linear, sessile, parallel veins, in 2 ranks (vertical rows), leaf sheath usually open or split and often overlapping, but may be closed Flowers: small in 2 rows forming a spikelet (1 to several flowers), may be 1 to many spikelets with pedicels or sessile to stem; each flower within a spikelet is between an outer limna (bract, with a midrib) and an inner palea (bract, 2-nerved or keeled usually) – these 3 parts together make the floret – the 2 bottom bracts of the spikelet do not have flowers and are termed glumes (may be reduced or absent), the rachilla is the axis that hold the florets; sepals and petals absent; 1-6 but often 3 stamens; 1 pistil, 1-3 but usually 2 styles, ovary superior, 1 ovule – there are exceptions to most everything!! Fruit: seed-like grain (seed usually fused to the pericarp (ovary wall) or not) Other: very large and important family; Monocotyledons Group Genera: 600+ genera; locally many genera 2 slides per species WARNING – family descriptions are only a layman’s guide and should not be used as definitive POACEAE [GRAMINEAE] – CYNODONTEAE TRIBE Sideoats Grama; Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr. var. curtipendula - Cynodonteae (Tribe) Bermuda Grass; Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. (Introduced) - Cynodonteae (Tribe) Egyptian Grass [Durban Crowfoot]; Dactyloctenium aegyptium (L.) Willd (Introduced) [Indian] Goose Grass; Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plant List for Texas Range and Pasture Plant
    MASTER PLANT LIST FOR TEXAS RANGE AND RS1.044 PASTURE PLANT IDENTIFICATION CONTEST MASTER PLANT LIST NAME OF PLANT SEASON OF LONGEVITY GROWTH ORIGIN ECONOMIC VALUE Latin Names are for reference only WILDLIFE GRAZING GRASSES Annual Perennial Cool Warm Native Introduced Good Fair Poor Good Fair Poor Poison 1 Alkali sacaton Sporobolus airoides X X X X X 2 Bahiagrass Paspalum notatum X X X X X 3 Barnyardgrass Echinocloa crusgalli var. crusgalli X X X X X 4 Beaked panicum Panicum anceps X X X X X 5 Bermudagrass Cynodon dactylon X X X X X 6 Big bluestem Adropogon gerardii X X X X X 7 Black grama Bouteloua eriopoda X X X X X 8 Blue grama Bouteloua gracilis X X X X X 9 Broomsedge bluestem Andropogon virginicus X X X X X 10 Brownseed paspalum Paspalum plicatulum X X X X X 11 Buffalograss Buchloe dactyloides X X X X X 12 Buffelgrass Pennisetum ciliare X X X X X 13 Burrograss Scleropogon brevifolius X X X X X 14 Bush muhly Muhlenbergia porteri X X X X X 15 California cottontop Digitaria californica X X X X X 16 Canada wildrye Elymus canadensis X X X X X 17 Common carpetgrass Axonopus affinis X X X X X 18 Common curlymesquite Hilaria belangeri X X X X X 19 Dallisgrass Paspalum dilatatum X X X X X 20 Eastern gamagrass Tripsacum dactyloides X X X X X 21 Fall witchgrass Leptoloma cognatum X X X X X 22 Florida paspalum Paspalum floridanum X X X X X 23 Green sprangletop Leptochloa dubia X X X X X 24 Gulf cordgrass Spartina spartinae X X X X X 25 Hairawn muhly Muhlenbergia capillaris X X X X X 26 Hairy grama Boutelous hirsuta X X X X X 27 Hairy tridens Erioneuron pilosum X X X X X 28 Hall panicum Panicum hallii var.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary List of the Vascular Plants and Wildlife at the Village Of
    A Floristic Evaluation of the Natural Plant Communities and Grounds Occurring at The Key West Botanical Garden, Stock Island, Monroe County, Florida Steven W. Woodmansee [email protected] January 20, 2006 Submitted by The Institute for Regional Conservation 22601 S.W. 152 Avenue, Miami, Florida 33170 George D. Gann, Executive Director Submitted to CarolAnn Sharkey Key West Botanical Garden 5210 College Road Key West, Florida 33040 and Kate Marks Heritage Preservation 1012 14th Street, NW, Suite 1200 Washington DC 20005 Introduction The Key West Botanical Garden (KWBG) is located at 5210 College Road on Stock Island, Monroe County, Florida. It is a 7.5 acre conservation area, owned by the City of Key West. The KWBG requested that The Institute for Regional Conservation (IRC) conduct a floristic evaluation of its natural areas and grounds and to provide recommendations. Study Design On August 9-10, 2005 an inventory of all vascular plants was conducted at the KWBG. All areas of the KWBG were visited, including the newly acquired property to the south. Special attention was paid toward the remnant natural habitats. A preliminary plant list was established. Plant taxonomy generally follows Wunderlin (1998) and Bailey et al. (1976). Results Five distinct habitats were recorded for the KWBG. Two of which are human altered and are artificial being classified as developed upland and modified wetland. In addition, three natural habitats are found at the KWBG. They are coastal berm (here termed buttonwood hammock), rockland hammock, and tidal swamp habitats. Developed and Modified Habitats Garden and Developed Upland Areas The developed upland portions include the maintained garden areas as well as the cleared parking areas, building edges, and paths.
    [Show full text]
  • WHITE TRIDENS Tridens Albescens (Vasey) Woot
    Natural Resources Conservation Service Plant Guide WHITE TRIDENS Tridens albescens (Vasey) Woot. & Standl. Plant Symbol = TRAL2 Scientific Names: Rhombolytrum albescens (Vasey) Nash Description General: White tridens is a warm season perennial grass with short-knotty, hard rhizomatous bases. Culms average 15 to 40 inches (40-100 cm) tall with 6 to 12 inch (15-30 cm) long blades that are flat, glabrous, with blue-green color. The inflorescence is a dense panicle, 8 inches long (20 cm) with appressed branches. Spikelets are white to pinkish purple-tinged (Blackworth et al., 2007 and Shaw, 2012). Caryopses are pale yellow to white. White tridens averages 4,535,900 seeds per pound. Distribution: White tridens occurs in Texas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico west of US highway 45, and extending south into Mexico. It is found primarily on clay or loamy soils that periodically receive an abundance of water (Powell, 1994 and Everitt et al., 2011). For current distribution, please consult the Plant Profile page for this species on the PLANTS Web site. Habitat: White tridens is usually associated with buffalograss [Bouteloua dactyloides (Nutt.) J.T. Columbus] and bristlegrass [Setaria vulpiseta (Lam.) Roemer & J.A. Schultes]. It is commonly found in partial shade, wet areas, ditches, or swales (Hatch et. Al., Guadalupe Germplasm White Tridens. Photo by Texas Native Seeds 1999). Adaptation White tridens is adapted to low prairies, ditches, swales, and open woods on clay and loam soils prone to inundation. Uses White tridens can be used for critical area revegetation, erosion control, right-of-way plantings, inclusion in range mixes for forage and wildlife plantings.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire in the Southeastern Grasslands, By
    Fire in the Southeastern Grasslands RICHARD J. VOGL Department of Biology California State University Los Angeles, CA 90032 INTRODUCTION ~ERE has been more research on the effects of fire in the southeastern United States than in any region of North America. Most studies have been concerned with the effects of fire on the trees, including the role of fire in controlling hardwood suc­ cession, fire damage to trees, the effects of fire on soils and litter, the influence of fire on conifer growth and reproduction, and the relationships of fire to tree diseases (Garren 1943; Ahlgren and Ahlgren 1960; Cushwa 1968). A lesser, but stilI substantial number of studies have been focused on the effects of fire on forage yields and livestock production (Wahlenberg et al. 1939), and the use of fire in wildlife management in the Southeast. But academic or phy­ tosociological studies of the vegetational composition and of the effects of fire on the understory vegetation are generally lacking. Except for some range and wildlife research and several general studies (Wells and Shunk 1931; Leukel and St<Jkes 1939; Biswell and Lemon 1943; Burton 1944; Lemon 1949, 1967; Campbell 1955; Biswell1958; Hodgkins 1958; Arata 1959; Cushwa et al. 1966, 1970; Wolters 1972) , most investigators have ignored the herbaceous cover or grassland vegetation under southeastern trees. Even early botanists often became more interested in the unusual botanical features such as the southern extent of Appalachian tree species (Harper 1943, 1952), the description of the silaceous dunes of the 175 RICHARD J. VOGL Gulf Coast (Kurz 1942), the habits of eastern red cedar (Harper 1912), the vegetation of the Okefenokee Swamp (Wright and Wright 1932), or why the Black Belt Prairie of Alabama was treeless (Ranking and Davis 1971), thereby neglecting the widespread and common grassland vegetation and its relationship to fire.
    [Show full text]
  • Paradise Lost? the Coastal Prairie of Louisiana and Texas
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service U.S. Geological Survey Paradise Lost? The Coastal Prairie of Louisiana and Texas History Coastal prairie is a The Coastal Prairie is located along the western gulf coast of the United native grassland found States, in southwest Louisiana and southeast Texas, just inland from the along the coast of Texas coastal marsh (see map). This Coastal Prairie is a tallgrass prairie similar in Historical range of and Louisiana. Over nine Coastal Prairie. Stars many ways to the tallgrass prairie of represent national the midwestern United States. It is wildlife refuges. estimated that, in pre-settlement million acres of prairie times, there were nine million acres of Coastal Prairie, with once existed as a grassland 2.5 million acres in paradise for Native Americans and early settlers. Today less than 1% remains as a refuge for rare and endangered birds, mammals, reptiles, insects and plants. Is Louisiana, and 6.5 million acres in Texas. Today, substantially less than “Paradise Lost?” Private one percent of the Coastal Prairie remains with remnants totaling less than 100 acres in Louisiana and less groups, conservation than 65,000 acres in Texas. While much of the organizations, and former prairie has been government agencies are converted to pasture for working together to protect cattle grazing, the majority has and restore this “critically been altered for growing rice, imperiled” ecosystem. sugarcane, forage, and Coastal Prairie grain crops. In Louisiana, most of the They need your help and railroad remnant in prairie’s few remaining remnants are July found on narrow strips of land along support if this effort is to railroad tracks.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments Contributors: Printing was made possible through the generous funding from Adkins Arboretum; Baltimore County Department of Environmental Protection and Resource Management; Chesapeake Bay Trust; Irvine Natural Science Center; Maryland Native Plant Society; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; The Nature Conservancy, Maryland-DC Chapter; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Cape May Plant Materials Center; and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Reviewers: species included in this guide were reviewed by the following authorities regarding native range, appropriateness for use in individual states, and availability in the nursery trade: Rodney Bartgis, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Ashton Berdine, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Chris Firestone, Bureau of Forestry, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Chris Frye, State Botanist, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Mike Hollins, Sylva Native Nursery & Seed Co. William A. McAvoy, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. Mary Pat Rowan, Landscape Architect, Maryland Native Plant Society. Rod Simmons, Maryland Native Plant Society. Alison Sterling, Wildlife Resources Section, West Virginia Department of Natural Resources. Troy Weldy, Associate Botanist, New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Graphic Design and Layout: Laurie Hewitt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Special thanks to: Volunteer Carole Jelich; Christopher F. Miller, Regional Plant Materials Specialist, Natural Resource Conservation Service; and R. Harrison Weigand, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Maryland Wildlife and Heritage Division for assistance throughout this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Site Descriptions for New Mexico
    Ecological Site Descriptions For New Mexico Acknowledgements These site descriptions and map are for use in conducting range evaluation contests for 4H and FFA youth and are adapted from USDA-NRCS Ecological Site Descriptions for New Mexico. 2 Table of Contents Categories HV-1 Pages 11-26 Swale Dry Loamy Loamy Salty Bottomland Gravelly Loam (Basalt) Breaks Stony Loam Salty Meadow Malpais Limy Gravelly Fan HV-2 Pages 27-43 Gravelly Fan Gravelly Slopes Limy Loamy Meadows Salt Meadow Basalt Breaks Stony Loam Shallow Gravelly Salty Bottomland ND-1 Pages 44-64 Salty Bottomland ND-1 Salt Meadow Loamy Sandy Limy Clayey Sand Flats Shallow Deep Sand Sodic Slopes Shale Hills Cobbly Hills HP-1 Pages 65-85 Swales -- Meadow 3 Gravelly Deep Sand High Lime Loamy High Lime Clay Loam Very Shallow Sandy Plains Sandy Loams Shallow Sandstone Sandstone Breaks Salt Flats HP-2 Pages 86 Saline - HP2 HP-3 Pages 87-105 Shallow Sandy – HP3 Loamy Sand Loamy Saline Very Shallow Sandy Sandy Plains Sandhills Draw SD-1 Pages 106-130 High Lime - SD1 Bottomland Limestone Hills Clayey Swale Hills Gyp Upland Deep Sand Malpais Mesa Breaks Gravelly Sand Salty Bottomland Loamy Sandy SD-2 Pages 131-163 Gravelly SD -2 4 Deep Sand Loamy Shallow Sandy Sandy Draw Bottomland Limy Limestone Hills Clayey Gyp Upland Gyp Hills Salt Meadow Salty Bottomland Sand Flats Gravelly Sand Hills Gravelly Loam Shallow Malpais SD-3 Pages 164-196 Gravelly SD-3 Shallow Sandy Loamy Sand Sandy Deep Sand Loamy Draw Bottomland Limestone Hills Sandhill Shallow Limy Gyp Upland Gyp Hills Salt Meadows Salty
    [Show full text]
  • SWAP 2015 Report
    STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN September 2015 GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WILDLIFE RESOURCES DIVISION Georgia State Wildlife Action Plan 2015 Recommended reference: Georgia Department of Natural Resources. 2015. Georgia State Wildlife Action Plan. Social Circle, GA: Georgia Department of Natural Resources. Recommended reference for appendices: Author, A.A., & Author, B.B. Year. Title of Appendix. In Georgia State Wildlife Action Plan (pages of appendix). Social Circle, GA: Georgia Department of Natural Resources. Cover photo credit & description: Photo by Shan Cammack, Georgia Department of Natural Resources Interagency Burn Team in Action! Growing season burn on May 7, 2015 at The Nature Conservancy’s Broxton Rocks Preserve. Zach Wood of The Orianne Society conducting ignition. i Table&of&Contents& Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iv! Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ x! I. Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................................. 1! A Plan to Protect Georgia’s Biological Diversity ....................................................... 1! Essential Elements of a State Wildlife Action Plan .................................................... 2! Species of Greatest Conservation Need ...................................................................... 3! Scales of Biological Diversity
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Native Versus Old-Field Vegetation in Upland Pinelands Managed with Frequent Fire, South Georgia, Usa
    A COMPARISON OF NATIVE VERSUS OLD-FIELD VEGETATION IN UPLAND PINELANDS MANAGED WITH FREQUENT FIRE, SOUTH GEORGIA, USA Thomas E. Ostertag1 and Kevin M. Robertson2 Tall Timbers Research Station, 13093 Henry Beadel Drive, Tallahassee, FL 32312, USA ABSTRACT Fire-maintained, herb-dominated upland pinelands of the southeastern U.S. Coastal Plain may be broadly divided into those that have arisen through secondary succession following abandonment of agriculture (old-field pinelands) and those that have never been plowed (native pinelands). The ability to distinguish these habitat types is important for setting conservation priorities by identifying natural areas for conservation and appropriate management and for assessing the ecological value and restoration potential for old-field pine forests managed with frequent fire. However, differences in species composition have rarely been quantified. The goals of this study were to characterize the species composition of native and old-field pineland ground cover, test the ability to distinguish communities of previously unknown disturbance history, and suggest indicator species for native versus old-field pinelands. Plant composition was surveyed in areas known to be native ground cover, those known to be old fields, and those with an uncertain disturbance history. Twelve permanent plots were established in each cover type and sampled in spring (April–May) and fall (October–November) in 2004 and 2005. Of the 232 species identified in the plots, 56 species were present only in native ground-cover plots, of which 17 species occurred in a sufficient number of plots to have a statistically significant binomial probability of occurring in native ground cover and might be considered indicator species.
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Phylogeny and Classification of the Cynodonteae
    TAXON 65 (6) • December 2016: 1263–1287 Peterson & al. • Phylogeny and classification of the Cynodonteae A molecular phylogeny and classification of the Cynodonteae (Poaceae: Chloridoideae) with four new genera: Orthacanthus, Triplasiella, Tripogonella, and Zaqiqah; three new subtribes: Dactylocteniinae, Orininae, and Zaqiqahinae; and a subgeneric classification of Distichlis Paul M. Peterson,1 Konstantin Romaschenko,1,2 & Yolanda Herrera Arrieta3 1 Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012, U.S.A. 2 M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences, Kiev 01601, Ukraine 3 Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CIIDIR Unidad Durango-COFAA, Durango, C.P. 34220, Mexico Author for correspondence: Paul M. Peterson, [email protected] ORCID PMP, http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9405-5528; KR, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7248-4193 DOI https://doi.org/10.12705/656.4 Abstract Morphologically, the tribe Cynodonteae is a diverse group of grasses containing about 839 species in 96 genera and 18 subtribes, found primarily in Africa, Asia, Australia, and the Americas. Because the classification of these genera and spe­ cies has been poorly understood, we conducted a phylogenetic analysis on 213 species (389 samples) in the Cynodonteae using sequence data from seven plastid regions (rps16-trnK spacer, rps16 intron, rpoC2, rpl32-trnL spacer, ndhF, ndhA intron, ccsA) and the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS 1 & 2) to infer evolutionary relationships and refine the
    [Show full text]