DOCSLIB.ORG

54-1934032 990 201312.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
54-1934032 990 201312.Pdf OMB No 1545-0047 Form Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax Under section 501 (c), 527, or 4947(a)(1) ot the Internal Revenue Code (except private foundations) > Do not enter Social Security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Open to Public lntemelDepanmeRevenuehSemce955" > Information about Form 990 and its instructions is at www.irs.gov/form990. Ins - ection A For the 2013 calendar year, or tax year beginning , 2013, and ending . 8 Check it appiicabie C Name of organization Dono r 5 Cap i t al Fund I I nc D Employer Identication Number Address change DomgBusmessAs 541934032 Name change Number and street (or P 0 box if mail is not delivered to sheet address) Room/sumo E Telephone number Inihalretum P.O. Box 1305 (703) 535-3563 Tennmated City or town, state or provtnce, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code Amendedretum Alexandria VA 22313 G Grossrecelpts $ 57,644,334. Application pending F Name and address of pnnapal otcer: H(a) is this a group return for subordinates? Yes X No VA 2 2 3 l 3 (M Are all subordinates Included? Yes No Whitney L. Ball P.O. Box 1305 Alexandria if 'No, attach a list. (see instructions) l Tax-exemptstatus [xl501(c)(3) [7501mm )< (insertno) | |4947(a)(i) or | [527 > J Website: > donorscapital fund . org H(c) Group exemption number K Form oforganization lXICorporation lTTrust I Ikssociationil Other> I L Year of formation 1 9 9 9 W State of legal domicile MD R'a'rrtTIII Summary 1 Briey describe the organization's mission or most Signicant activities: @2ng BC_529_(al_(1_) 421 G131 BIS-'1 111151 a_11v_iaer B19991 cu sdecetio: 3252891 an! ELiVEtE _in_it_iaixe,_s_c_ie_tias_nr>s EEWESJE _an_d 36511511 _ne_ed_sl_ i_nc_lu_dm t_h_se_ r_el_at_ir_19_tg gogieL 1e1_fa_re_, _he_al_th_: swueneeaeeenissr soxernanser 09192 23121998.: _an_d_ar_ts_ a_nd_ 61113132: _an_d Erich snsogrys Bhilznrhrom 5 ans _ir51i_v1d2a_l giving err! 52520283133 1_iy_a_s _ar1 answer. t__sgc_ie_tr a aegis ,_ atoms-221 o_q9ier_neet_al_ Erolvsmsrrt; 3 2 Check this box > if the organization discontinued its operations or disposed of more than 25% of its net assets. 5 3 Number of voting members of the governing body (Part VI, line 1a) . 3 9 a 4 Number of independent voting members of the governing body (Part VI. line 1b) . 4 8 :2 5 Total number of Individuals employed in calendar year 2013 (Part V. line 2a) . 5 o E 6 Total number of volunteers (estimate if necessary) . - . - . 6 0 2 7a Total unrelated business revenue from Part Vlll, column (C), line 12 . 7a 3 , 963 . b Net unrelated busmess taxable income from Form 990-T, line 34 . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - 7b 3 , 9 63 . Prior Year Current Year 0 8 Contnbutionsandgrants(PartVlll,line1h) . 55,254,703. 48,789,482. E 9 Program seNice revenue (Part Vlll, line 29) . a 10 Investment income (Part VIII. column (A). lines 3, 4. and 7d) . 1, 505, 438 _ 901, 539 _ I: 11 Other revenue (Part VIII, column (A), lines 5, 6d, 80, 9c, 10c, and 11e) . 12 Total revenue add lines 8 through 11 (must equal Part VII], column (A), line 12) . 56,760,141. 49,691,021. 13 Grants and .similar amounts paid (Part lX, column (A), lines-1:3)WF\ . .) ._. - - -- 56,114,235. 52,091,881. 14 Benets paid to or for members (Part IX, column (A), line 4) . ~ Mu}! c-J . In 15 Salaries, other compensation, employee benets (Pait IX, line5.540) . g 16a Professmnal fundraising fees (Part IX. column (A), line tie) . Natl . 1. 8 . E- b Total fundraising expenses (Part IX, column (D), line 25) > 17 Other expenses (Part IX, column (A). lines 11a-11d. 11f-24e) r- '-v-:-\- - Uf: - - 902 , 7 68 . 854 , 334 . 18 Total expenses. Add lines 13-17 (must equal Part IX. column (A),line 25), ....-. 57 I 01 7 I 003 _ 52 I 94 6 I 2 1 5 _ A 19 Revenue less expenses. Subtract line 18 from line 12 . 2 5 6 , 8 62 . 3 , 2 55 , 1 94 . 3 2 Beginning of Current Year End of Year g; 20 Totalassets(PartX,line16) . 36,711,408. 35,756,879. 3% 21 Total liabilities (Part X, line 26) . 2 8 6 , 51 6 . 1 l 5 , 822 . |L 22 Net assets or fund balances. Subtract line 21 from line 20 . 36,424,892. 35,641,057. Ealll' Si nature Block Under penalties of perjury, I declare 't I have mined return, including accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and belief. it is true. correct. and complete Declaration of preparer( er thang) is ed on all infonmyinfiich prepa has any knowledge / 1 I l. - | 4 no i/ 70 11 Sign D f ' ' Here President Type or pnnt name and title V Punt/Type preparer: name Preparers Signature Date Check U ,f PTIN Paid A 1 I 1 self-employed Preparer Finn's name b e _L I '" EreDa re Ci. Use Only rm-s amass > " Fimis ElN > Phone no. May the IRS discuss this return with the preparer shown above? (see instructions) . [Yes I I No BAA For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the separate instructions. TEEAO101 mos/13 Form 990 (2013) 9n Form 990 (2013) Donors Capital Fund, Inc [Part III | Statement of Program Service Accomplishments Check if Schedule 0 contains a response or note to any line in this Part III 1 Briey describe the organization's misswn 1PP9 r_t_ Pic. 9912 LL11 4.21 @191 9395;]- weigh _a_lle_V.i t_e_r _h_r911q_h__________________ _ _ sdgcgtioauessagql 313129239932i_ti_at_iv_es_: _so_ci_eY_s_mgs Begvesgvs 3_r1di_c11_nses_r _in_c 134.1% Eloiejiltin _to_s_0c_ia_1 _ e_e 5031922. Eage_2-_P_ar'- L"lej Leaningeg). ________________________________________ _ _ 2 Did the organization undertake any signicant program serwces during the year which were not listed on the prior Form 990 or 990.527 . D Yes No If 'Yes, describe these new services on Schedule 0. 3 Did the organization cease conducting, or make signicant changes in how it conducts. any program services? . D Yes No If 'Yes, describe these changes on Schedule 0. 4 Describe the organizations program serwce accomplishments for each of its three largest program serwces, as measured by expenses. Section 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations and section 4947(a)(1) tnists are required to report the amount of grants and allocations to others, the total expenses. and revenue, if any, for each program serwce reported 4a(Code )(Expenses $ 52,822,556. includinggrantsof $ 52,091,881, )(Revenue $ 0. ) A QOBCLrjvissd. Eud_p_r<yr_ar 05 _do_ngr _se_ek_i39_t2 sweothBC. 202(2); 1_) _&_529_(a_) (A 995., _wh12h_a_ll_ezi2t:_ 913029. _ gdgcgtiogcrsssasgh_aILd_Pizae_iiiet}&esu secietyimes; Bey/28319 3n_d_rgdi_cal_n9_es_l _in_cl_ud_iry_tllos_e_r213tin3 20.590311 _ Eeifer2:_halt ,_e;1v_i r_0rne_nt_: 3091191119,. 10189926,. $032192 56265919. std. a_rt_s _an_d_clLuLeLaad_whlsh_ec2ugase_Euwwmy_ Eng _in_di_v_id_ua_l_q_iv_iry_a2d_ 3P2n1131itj _as_ an_a_ns_w2r_t__sgc_ic=-_tx E 28395,. 25. 9p20e_d _t9 soygameniL-Ljavsljsmgns -_ 4 b (Code ) (Expenses $ including grants of $ ) (Revenue $ ) 4 c (Code ) (Expenses 5 including grants of $ ) (Revenue $ ) 4 d Other program services. (Descnbe in Schedule 0 ) (Expenses $ including grants of $ ) (Revenue $ ) 4 e Total program service expenses > 52, 822,556. BAA TEEAO102 07/02/13 Form 990 (2013) Form 990 (2013) Donors Capital Fund, Inc 541934032 P3963 [an IV IChecklist of Required Schedules Yes No 1 Is the organization described in section 501(c)(3) or 4947(a)(1) (other than a private foundation)? If 'Yes, complete Schedule A . 1 X 2 Is the organization reqUIred to complete Schedule 8, Schedule of Contributors (see instructions)? . 2 X 3 Did the organization engage in direct or indirect political campaign actiwties on behalf of or in opposmon to candidates for public ofce? If 'Yes,'complete Schedule C, Partl . 3 X 4 Section 501(c)(3) organizations. Did the organization engage in lobbying actiVIties, or have a section 501(h) election in effect during the tax year? If Yes,'comp/ele Schedule C, Part II . 4 X 5 Is the organization a section 501(c)(4), 501(c)(5), or 501(c)(6) organization that receives membership dues, assessments, or Similar amounts as dened in Revenue Procedure 98-19? It 'Yes,complete Schedule C, Part III . 5 X 6 Did the organization maintain any donor advised funds or any similar funds or accounts for which donors have the nght g) prt;Wlde adwce on the distribution or investment of amounts in such funds or accounts? If 'Yes,complete Schedule D, X art . 6 7 Did the organization receive or hold a conservation easement, including easements to preserve open space, the environment, histonc land areas, or historic structures? If 'Yes,'complete Schedule D, Part II . 7 X 8 Did the organization maintain collections of works of art, historical treasures, or other Similar assets? If 'Yes, complete Schedule D, Part III . 8 X 9 Did the organization report an amount in Part X, line 21, for escrow or custodial account liability, serve as a custodian for amounts not listed in Part X, or prowde credit counseling, debt management. credit repair, or debt negotiation services? If 'Yes,complete Schedule D, Part Iv . 9 X 10 Did the organization, directly or through a related organization, hold assets in temporarily restncted endowments, permanent endowments, or quaSI-endowments? If 'Yes, complete Schedule D, Part V . 10 X 11 If the organization's answer to any of the followmg questions is Yes', then complete Schedule D, Parts VI, VII, VIII, IX, or X as applicable. a Did the organization report an amount for land, buildings and eqUIpment in Part X, line 10? If 'Yes,complete Schedule D, Part VI. 11 a X b Did the organization report an amount for investments - other secuntles in Part X, line 12 that is 5% or more of its total assets reported in Part X, line 16? If Yes, complete Schedule D, Part VII .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Congressional Record—Senate S5011
    July 12, 2016 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S5011 The clerk will report the bill by title. COMMENDING THE TENNESSEE experienced its warmest June on record The senior assistant legislative clerk VALLEY AUTHORITY ON THE ever. Already this year there have been read as follows: 80TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE UNI- eight weather-related and climate-re- A bill (S. 2650) to amend the Internal Rev- FIED DEVELOPMENT OF THE lated disasters that each caused at enue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross in- TENNESSEE RIVER SYSTEM least $1 billion in damage. Globally, it come any prizes or awards won in competi- Mr. COTTON. Mr. President, I ask was found that 2015 was the hottest tion in the Olympic Games or the year on record, and so far this year is Paralympic Games. unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the consideration of S. Res. on track to beat last year. We can’t There being no objection, the Senate 528, submitted earlier today. even hold the record for a year—2016 proceeded to consider the bill. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The has been as hot as Pokemon GO—and Mr. COTTON. Mr. President, I ask clerk will report the resolution by anyone watching the Senate floor to- unanimous consent that the bill be title. night who is younger than 31 has never read a third time and passed, the mo- The senior assistant legislative clerk experienced in their life a month where tion to reconsider be considered made read as follows: the temperature was below the 20th and laid upon the table, and that the century average.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerated Attacks on Clean Energy by Koch Bros
    Checks and Balances Project Documents: Accelerated Attacks on Clean Energy by Koch Bros. $192 Million to 72 Groups Associated with Opposition to Clean Energy Solutions and Climate Change Denial from 1997-2013 $108 Million to At Least 19 Groups to Fight State Renewable Energy Policies 2011-2013 (Over 18 months, Checks and Balances Project conducted the first in-depth investigation into Koch Industries, Inc. AND what we call the Koch Advocacy Network. Over 350 low-profile regulatory disclosures and more than 8,000 legal disclosure forms drawn from over 60 public agencies, databases and courts were examined. Research was completed prior to the 2016 election.) In August 2015 President Obama singled out the “massive lobbying efforts backed by fossil fuel interests, or conservative think tanks, or the Koch brothers pushing for new laws to roll back renewable energy standards or prevent new clean energy businesses from succeeding.” The President described these anti-clean energy efforts as “rent seeking and trying to protect old ways of doing business and standing in the way of the future.”1 Charles Koch responded that, “We are not trying to prevent new clean energy businesses from succeeding” and warned against “subsidizing uneconomical forms of energy — whether you call them ‘green,’ ‘renewable’ or whatever.” He continued, “And there is a big debate on whether you have a real disease or something that’s not that serious. I recognize there is a big debate about that. But whatever it is, the cure is to do things in the marketplace, and to let individuals and companies innovate, to come up with alternatives that will deal with whatever the problem may be in an economical way so we don’t squander resources on uneconomic approaches.” 2 The defense outlined by Charles mirrors the strategy of the network he oversees.
    [Show full text]
  • Threat to Public Education Now Centers on Massachusetts
    THREAT TO PUBLIC EDUCATION NOW CENTERS ON MASSACHUSETTS May 2016 Preface This document updates and expands on Threat from the Right, an MTA task force report issued in May 2013. During the intervening years, the threat to public education, organized labor and social justice has grown substantially. Massachusetts is now in the crosshairs, with the forces behind charter schools, privatization and other attacks on the public good coalescing on Beacon Hill and throughout the state. That is reflected in the title of the 2016 edition, Threat to Public Education Now Centers on Massachusetts. No one should doubt the danger of the challenges outlined in these pages or the intensity of the forces behind them, which are national in scope. Nevertheless, winning the many fights we face is well within the power of the MTA and our allies — parents, students and other members of communities across Massachusetts and the nation. Understanding our opponents is an important step, and this report is intended to help us move toward meaningful victories as we continue to organize, mobilize and build the power we need to realize the goals of our Strategic Action Plan. Contents Introduction Elements of the Charter Campaign The Massachusetts Alignment ......................................................................................................7 Great Schools Massachusetts.......................................................................................................9 Families for Excellent Schools ....................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Threat from the Right Intensifies
    THREAT FROM THE RIGHT INTENSIFIES May 2018 Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 Meeting the Privatization Players ..............................................................................3 Education Privatization Players .....................................................................................................7 Massachusetts Parents United ...................................................................................................11 Creeping Privatization through Takeover Zone Models .............................................................14 Funding the Privatization Movement ..........................................................................................17 Charter Backers Broaden Support to Embrace Personalized Learning ....................................21 National Donors as Longtime Players in Massachusetts ...........................................................25 The Pioneer Institute ....................................................................................................................29 Profits or Professionals? Tech Products Threaten the Future of Teaching ....... 35 Personalized Profits: The Market Potential of Educational Technology Tools ..........................39 State-Funded Personalized Push in Massachusetts: MAPLE and LearnLaunch ....................40 Who’s Behind the MAPLE/LearnLaunch Collaboration? ...........................................................42 Gates
    [Show full text]
  • EXPOSED:The State Policy Network
    EXPOSED: The State Policy Network The Powerful Right-Wing Network Helping to Hijack State Politics and Government CENTER FOR MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY | ALECEXPOSED.ORG November 2013 ©2013 Center for Media and Democracy. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photography, recording, or by information exchange and retrieval system, without permission from the authors. Center for Media and Democracy ALECexposed.org | PRWatch.org | SourceWatch.org 520 University Avenue, Suite 260 Madison, WI 53703 | (608) 260-9713 (This publication is available online at ALECexposed.org) CMD, publisher of ALECexposed.org, PRWatch.org, and SourceWatch.org, has created a clearinghouse of information on the State Policy Network at sourcewatch.org/index.php/Portal:State_Policy_Network and a reporter’s guide to SPN at prwatch.org/node/11909/. Please see these online resources for more information. This report was written by Rebekah Wilce, with contributions by Lisa Graves, Mary Bottari, Nick Surgey, Jay Riestenberg, Katie Lorenze, Drew Curtis, and Sari Williams. This report on SPN is also part of a joint effort with Progress Now called www.StinkTanks.org, which includes information about what citizens can do in response to SPN's secretive influence on the state laws that affect their lives. Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 SPN’s Founding and Role in the National Right-Wing
    [Show full text]
  • Computer-Assisted Detection and Classification of Misinformation
    1 Computer-assisted detection and classification of 2 misinformation about climate change 1 2 3,4,* 1 3 Travis G. Coan , Constantine Boussalis , John Cook , and Mirjam O. Nanko 1 4 Department of Politics and the Exeter Q-Step Centre, University of Exeter, United Kingdom. 2 5 Department of Political Science, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. 3 6 Monash Climate Change Communication Research Hub, Monash University, Australia. 4 7 Center for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University, USA. * 8 Corresponding author email: [email protected] 9 ABSTRACT A growing body of scholarship investigates the role of misinformation in shaping the debate on climate change. Our research builds on and extends this literature by 1) developing and validating a comprehensive taxonomy of climate misinformation, 2) conducting the largest content analysis to date on contrarian claims, 3) developing a computational model to accurately detect specific claims, and 4) drawing on an extensive corpus from conservative think-tank (CTTs) websites and contrarian blogs to 10 construct a detailed history of misinformation over the past 20 years. Our study finds that climate misinformation produced by CTTs and contrarian blogs has focused on attacking the integrity of climate science and scientists and, increasingly, has challenged climate policy and renewable energy. We further demonstrate the utility of our approach by exploring the influence of corporate and foundation funding on the production and dissemination of specific contrarian claims. 11 Organised climate change contrarianism has played a significant role in the spread of misinformation and the delay of 1 12 meaningful action to mitigate climate change. Research suggests that climate misinformation leads to a number of negative 2 3 4 13 outcomes such as reduced climate literacy, public polarization, canceling out accurate information, reinforcing climate 5 6 14 silence, and influencing how scientists engage with the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Online Material Table of Contents
    Supplementary Online Material Table of Contents S-1 Coding Instructions – U.S. National Climate Counter-movement Organizations 2 S-2 Coding Sheet – U.S. National Climate Counter-movement Organizations 3 S-3 U.S. National Climate Counter-movement Organizations 4 S-4 U.S. National Climate Change Counter-movement Income Data 2003 – 2010 5 S-5 U.S. National Climate Change Counter-movement Income Distribution 2003 – 2010 36 S-6 Foundation Funding of U.S. National Climate Counter-movement By Foundation and Year 39 S-7 .Foundation Funding of U.S. National Climate Counter-movement By Organization and Year 43 S-8 Foundation Funding of U.S. National Climate Counter-movement Organizations – By Foundation 45 S-9 Foundation Funding of U.S. National Climate Counter-movement Organizations – By Recipient 79 S 10 Climate Change Counter-movement Network Dimensions 113 S 11 Climate Change Counter-movement Network - Relative Node Strength 114 S 12 Climate Change Counter-movement Network - Relative Node Degree 115 Figure S-1 116 Methods Appendix 117 1 S-1 Coding Instructions – U.S. National Climate Counter-movement Organizations The purpose of this organizational coding is to identify the organizations that make up the climate counter-movement in the United States. Definition of climate counter-movement – organizations that advocate against government policies to take substantive action to mitigate climate change. Specifically, this movement opposes mandatory restrictions on GHG emissions, either through regulations or a carbon fee. The advocacy of this community contains several different arguments, such as: 1. Climate change is not occurring. 2. Climate change is occurring, but it is not due to humans.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kingpins of Carbon and Their War on Democracy
    Page 1 The Kingpins of Carbon and Their War on Democracy ©Tim Aubry/Greenpeace Page 2 The Kingpins of Carbon and Their War on Democracy published by: Greenpeace US September 2014 all photos © Greenpeace Written by: Charlie Cray and Peter Montague Charlie Cray is a Research Specialist for Peter Montague, Ph.D., is a journalist and histo- Greenpeace US. Research assistance rian living in New Brunswick, N.J., where he is provided by Skyler Kopko and Connor active in the New Jersey Environmental Justice Gibson. Alliance. He is a member of the National Writer’s Union (UAW Local 1981, AFL-CIO), the NAACP, Greenpeace, and Sierra Club, and a fellow with the Science and Environmental Health Network in Ames, Iowa. © Les Stone /Greenpeace Page 3 The Kingpins of Carbon and Their War on Democracy Abstract Global warming is a potentially devastating problem requiring urgent action by governments. However, to date the U.S. government has remained largely paralyzed. Now new Greenpeace research has shed light on the sources of paralysis, a multi-decade war on democracy by the kingpins of carbon – the coal, oil, and gas industries allied with a handful of self-interested libertarian1 billionaires. Their strategy has aimed to (1) shrink, disable and paralyze progressive government and (2) manipulate the remaining levers of government power by (a) eliminating all restrictions on private money in elections and (b) disenfranchis- ing blacks, Latinos, the young, the elderly, and the disabled, all of whom are presumed to favor Democrats. Since 1975, their strategy has rolled back New Deal programs, weakened labor unions, and reversed victories of the civil rights movement, undermining the strength and cohesion of the middle class, further enriching and empowering a tiny self-interested elite.
    [Show full text]
  • Donors Capital Fund
    OMB No 1545-0047 Form 990 Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax 2011 Under section 501(c), 527, or 4947(aXl) of the Internal Revenue Code (except black lung benefit trust or private foundation) Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service The organization may have to use a copy of this return to satisfy state reporting requirements Insction""` A For the 2011 calen dar year, or tax year beginning , 2011, and ending Employer Identification Number B Check if applicable C Name of organization Donors Capital Fund, Inc D Address change Doing Business As 54-1934032 Room/ E Telephone number Name change Number and street (or P 0 box if mail is not delivered to street addr) suite Initial return P.O. Box 1305 (703) 535-3563 Terminated City, town or country State ZIP code + 4 Amended return Alexandria VA 22313 G Gross receipts $ 77, 397, 879. H(a) Is this a group return for affiliates? Application pending F Name and address of principal officer I Yes X No H(b) Are all affiliates included' Yes No Whitney L. Ball P.O. Box 1305 Alexandria VA 22313 If 'No,' attach a list (see instructions) I Tax-exempt status n 501(c)(3) 501(c) ( )4 (insert no.) 4947(a)(1) or 527 H(c) Group exemption n u m be r b" J Website: ► donorscapitalfund.org K Form of organization X Corporation Trust Association Others I L Year of Formation 1999 I M State of legal domicile VA P,art-i Summa ry 1 Briefly describe the organization's mission or most significant activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Sign Preparer
    Form 990 2014 Under section 501(c), 527, or 4941(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (except private foundations) Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. pito Public Information about Form 990 and its instructions is at www.irs gov/form990 - inspection A For the 2014 calendar year, or tax year beginning , 2014 , and ending B Check if applicable C Name of organization Donors Trust, Inc. D Employeridentirication number X Address change Doing business as 52-2166327 Name change Number and street (or P 0 box if mail is not delivered to street address) RoorNsute E Telephone number Initial return 1800 Dia g onal Rd 280 (703) 535-3563 Final returnltermmated City or town, state or province , country, and ZIP or foreign postal code Amended return Alexandria VA 22314 G Gross receipts $ 89, 249 , 953. Application pending F Name and address of principal officer H(a) Is this a group return for subordinates ? Yes No H(b) Are all subordinates include Yes N No Lawson R . Bader 1800 Dia onal Rd Ste 280 Alexndria VA 22314 If No,' attach a list (see insVUCbons) H I Tax-exempt status I X1 501(c)(3) 1 501(c) ( )' (insert no ) 4947 (a)(1) or 1 527 J Website' ► www.donorstrust.or H(c) Group exemption number ► K Form of organization X Corporation Trust Association Other L Year of formation 1999 M State of legal domicile MD Part I''. li Summary 1 Briefly describe the organization 's mission or most significant activities: SUPPORT CHAR I TIE S & S PON S OR P ROGRAMS WHICH ALLEVIATE, THROUGH EDUCATION, RESEARCH & PRIVATE INITIATIVES, SOCIETY'S MOST --------- ----------------------- ------------------------------ _PER_VAS_ _I_V_E _A_ND_ _ __ __ _ SOCIAL -EH , ca RADICAL NE EDS , INCLUDING THOSE RELATING TO WELFARE , HEAL CD _EN-_V_I _RO_N_M_EN_T, E_C_ON_ O_M_IC_ S_, _ G_O_V_ER_N_A_NC_E_, _ FOREIGN-GI -N R-E-L-AT-I-O-NS -A-ND _A_RT_S_ _AN_D_ _CUL_T_UR_E_.
    [Show full text]
  • Donors Capital Fund
    OMB No 1545-0047 •' Form 990 Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax 1 2010 A Under section 501(c), 527, or 4947(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (except black lung benefit trust or private foundation) Open to Public Department of the Treasury Internal Revend? S ervi ce The organization may have to use a cony of this return to satisfy state reporting requirements. Inspection A For the 2010 calendar year, or tax year beginning , 2010 , and ending B Check if applicable C Name of organization Donors Capital Fund, Inc D Employer Identification Number Address change Doing Business As 54-1934032 Name change Number and street (or P 0 box if mail is not delivered to street addr) Room/suite E Telephone number J Initial return P.O. Box 1305 (703) 535-3563 Terminated City, town or country State ZIP code + 4 Amended return Alexandria VA 22313 G Gross receipts $ 20, 737, 955. Application pendin F Name and address of principal officer H(a) Is this a group return for affiliates? Yes X No H(b) Are all affiliates included" Whitney L . Ball P. 0. Box 1305 Alexandria VA 22313 Yes No If 'No, ' attach a list (see instructions) H I Tax-exempt status X 501(c)(3) 501(c) ( ) - (insert no ) 4947(a)(1) or 527 J Website: 6- donorsca italfund. or H(c) Group exemption number 0" K Form of organization X Corporation Trust Association Other L Year of Formation 1999 M State of legal domicile VA Part I Summa ry 1 Briefly describe the organization's mission or most significant activities: support IRC 509 (a) (1) , (2) & (3) orgs, which alleviate, through - ---- ------------ education, research and private initiatives, society's most pervasive and radical needs , including those relating to social ----- ------ --- ------------------ ------ ---- welfare, health environment, economics, governance, foreign relations, and arts and culture; and which encourage philanthropy ---- --- ----- ----- ---- -- ----- E and individual giving and responsibility as an answer to society's needs, as opposed to governmental involvement.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Donors to the Islamophobia Network
    Chapter 1 Donors to the Islamophobia network A small group of conservative foundations and wealthy donors are the lifeblood of the Islamophobia network in America. They provide critical funding to a clutch of right-wing think tanks and misinformation experts who peddle hate and fear of Muslims and Islam—in the form of books, reports, websites, blogs, and carefully crafted talking points, which dedicated anti-Islam grassroots organizations and some right-wing religious groups use as propaganda for their constituency. These foundations and wealthy donors also provide direct funding to anti-Islam grass- roots groups. In this chapter of our report, we examine the top seven foundations and their prin- cipal backers who fund these Islamophobia groups. We then detail which of these groups receive this flood of cash to propagate their anti-Islam, anti-Muslim mis- information campaigns. Sometimes the money flowing from these foundations and their donors is clearly designed to promote Islamophobia, but more often the support provided is for general purpose use, which the think tanks and grassroots organizations then put to use on their primary purpose—spreading their mes- sages of hate and fear as far and wide as they can. It is possible that some of these donors and foundations, who spend millions improving child health and creating a more equal society, have no knowledge of the hateful and inaccurate propaganda generated with their money. Whether by design or by accident, the top seven philanthropic foundations we profile in this chapter are providing outsized support to a small but very vocal group of Islamophobic groups in our nation—groups that use their money to spread a deliberately misleading message about Islam and Muslims that is fun- damentally antithetical to our nation’s founding principles of religious freedom, inclusivity, and pluralism.
    [Show full text]