Fracture Mechanics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fracture Mechanics Fracture Mechanics Historical Prospective Historical Prospective Presented by Calvin M. Stewart, PhD MECH 5390-6390 Fall 2020 Outline • Societal Aspects • Historical Prospective • Recent Advances YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLvC7PjgHRlu6L1tgLEpOXabSpr5uhhsWY Societal Aspects Prospective and Connotation Perspectives of Fracture Connotation of Fracture • Society’s perspective of fracture is that the cracked object(s) is • preventable • harmful • irreparable Historical Prospective Arrowheads, Stone Cutting, Materials, the Industrial Revolution onwards Arrowhead Making • Fracture Mechanics has been exploited by humans from time immemorable. • The earliest humans exploited fracture mechanics to craft Arrowheads from brittle rock materials. • The earliest evidence is 64,000 years ago from Sibudu Cave in South Africa Stone Cutting • Egyptians became masters of fracture mechanics exploiting the brittle fracture of rocks to construct massive structures. (3000 BC>) Giza pyramid complex One of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World • Knowledge from the Ancient Africa spread into Europe through war, conflict and conquest, resulting in many of the structures admired by West Society such as the roman Colosseum Materials • The primary construction materials prior to the nineteenth century were timber, stone, brick and mortar; only the latter three materials were usually practical for large structures such as cathedrals, because trees of sufficient size for support beams were rare. • Consequently, pre-Industrial Revolution structures were usually designed to be loaded in compression. Industrial Revolution • With the Industrial Revolution came mass production of iron and steel. • These ductile materials removed the earlier restrictions on tensile designs. • Occasionally, steel structures in tensile failed well below the anticipate tensile strength. • Failures in railway equipment, boilers, and tanks due to a lack of understanding the Fracture Mechanics Contributors to Fracture In the nineteenth century, the quantitative connection between fracture stress and flaw size started to be explored. Rankine Griffith Paris Rice Saxena (1842) (1920s) (1961) (1960s) (1990) Inglis Irwin Wells Nikbin (1913) (1950s) (1961) (1976) Versailles train crash On May 8th, 1842 a train returning to Paris derailed at Meudon after the leading locomotive broke an axle, and the carriages behind piled into it and caught fire. It was the first French railway accident and the deadliest in the world at the time, causing between 52 and 200 deaths. Versailles train crash • Caused by fatigue failure of a locomotive axle at a sharp cornered shoulder • Notes: • Occurred on May 8th, 1842 • Carriages behind piled into the wrecked engines and caught fire • Problem solved with better axles designs William John Macquorn Rankine • Worked with railroad axles and other stress concentrations • Participated in studies following the Versailles accident • Recognized the distinctions between fatigue cracks from other cracks • Recognized the importance of stress concentrations in his investigation of railroad axle failures W. J. M. Rankine (1820-1872) SCF = MAX NOM ASTM formed • In 1898, Charles Benjamin Dudley investigated problems with the chemistry of materials used by the Pennsylvania Railroad • He later went on to found the ASTM, a committee-based organization focused on industrial progress • Much later, the committee on fracture was formed in the 1950’s Sir Charles Edward (C.E.) Inglis • In 1913, Inglis considered the fracture behavior of thin glass plates with elliptical holes. • Derived the distribution of elastic stress field in the front of the elliptical notch • Determined that the ratio of dimensions a to b plays a great role in determining the stress at point A. C.E. Inglis (1875-1952) H.M. Westergaard • Using a complex variables approach derived the stress distribution in front of an atomically sharp crack, the worst case, recognizing the stress singularity at the crack tip 퐾 휎푖푗 = 푓푖푗 휃 2휋푟 Westergaard (1888-1950) Alan Arnold Griffith • In 1920s, he extended the work of Inglis to the unstable propagation of a crack in linear-elastic brittle solids. • Invoking the first law of thermodynamics, he found that A flaw becomes unstable, and thus fracture occurs, when the strain energy change that results from an increment of crack growth is sufficient to overcome the surface energy of the material. • Origins of the Energy Approach!!! GG c • Only applicable to Brittle Solids, Not Ductile Metals A. A. Griffith (1893-1963) WWII Liberty Ships The S.S. Schenechtady as she appeared on the morning of Jan. 17, 1943, after suddenly and unexpectedly cracking in half for no apparent reason while moored at the fitting dock at Swan Island. (Image: U.S. GPO) During World War II many brittle fractures in welded tankers and Liberty ships motivated substantial efforts concerning preexisting defects and cracks and the influence of stress concentrations. WWII Liberty Ships • Early ships suffered hull and deck cracks • Number of ships that broke in half: 19 • Failure mechanism due to brittle crack growth at stress concentration • Temperature of the Steel submerged in water fell below the Brittle to Ductile Transition Temperature Liberty Ship Schenectady in the port of Portland fractured from deck to keel. George Rankin Irwin • Born in El Paso, Texas • The fracture mechanics research group at the Naval Research Laboratory was led by Dr. Irwin • In 1948, Irwin extended the work of Griffith by extending theories to ductile materials by including the energy dissipated by local plastic flow • In 1956, developed the energy release rate concept and leveraged Westergaards solution to identify the Stress Intensity Factors KK c Irwin (1907-1998) Ushering the Era of Modern Fracture Mechanics • In 1945, independently proposed the same modification to Griffith’s theory as Orowan • Generalized the Griffith’s theory for cracked bodies of arbitrary shape and loading for Mode I cracks • In 1956, used Westergaard’s analysis to introduce the concept of stress intensity parameter, K, as the amplitude of the crack tip stress field • In 1957, derived the relationship between the Griffith’s Crack Extension Force and K establishing K based Fracture Mechanics on a very firm footing • Estimated the size of the plastic zone and proposed a method to account for small-scale- yielding (SSY) • Derived the relationship between crack tip opening George R. Irwin (1907-1998) displacement and K • ASTM and ICF have medals named after Dr. Irwin • De Havilland Comet • The Comet, the first jet propelled passenger airplane, started service in May 1952 after more than 300 hours of flight tests. • Three plane crashes caused by repeated pressurization of the metallic fuselage skin at sharp corners near windows De Havilland Comet • After exhaustive investigations it was concluded that the accidents were caused by fatigue failure of the pressurized cabin. • All Comet aircraft of this type were taken out of service and additional attention was focused on airframe fatigue design. • Shortly after this, the first emphasis on fail-safe design in aircraft rather than safe-life gathered momentum in the USA. This would place much more attention on maintenance and inspection. Alan Arthur Wells • In 1956, Wells used fracture mechanics to show that the fuselage failures in several Comet jet aircraft resulted from fatigue cracks reaching a critical size. • In 1961, in parrallel with Irwin, Dugdale, and Barenblatt, developed a correction for crack tip plasticity • First proposed using Crack Tip Open Displacement (CTOD) as an alternative fracture criterion when significant plasticity proceeds failure. Wells (1924-2005) Paul C. Paris • In 1955 with working as a faculty associate for Boeing he investigated the “De Havilland Comet” Failures • In 1961, Discovered that the Fatigue Crack Growth Rate is related to the stress intensity factor range • Resulted in Paris Law da m =CK( ) dN Paul C Paris (1930-2017) Paul C. Paris • Extended the use of K, ∆K, for characterizing Fatigue Crack Growth, known as the Paris-Law • Proposed the concept of threshold value of ∆K and the effects of load ratio, R. • Envisioned the relationship between K and the environment assisted rate of crack growth • Led the adoption of damage tolerant approach to design in aerospace and power generation industries • Collaborated with George Irwin and Hiroshi Tada to produce the first compendium of K solutions • Made seminal contributions to the development of elastic-plastic fracture mechanics • ICF established the Paul Paris Gold Medal to memorialize his contributions and impact on the field ASTM Committees • ASTM Committee E-24 on Fracture testing was formed in 1964. This committee has contributed significantly to the field of fracture mechanics and fatigue crack growth. • ASTM Committee E08 on Fatigue and Fracture was formed in 1993 as a result of a merger between Committees E09 and E24. E08 meets twice a year, in May and November, with about 75 members attending two days of technical meetings and one or two days of workshops and symposia. The Committee has approximately 500 members and has jurisdiction of 32 standards, published in the Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 3.01. ASTM Test Methods for LEFM Test Method and Year of First Leaders Publication of Select Standards ASTM E-399 (1964): Measurement Edward T. Wessel, William Brown, of Plane Strain Fracture Toughness John Srawley, George Irwin, Paul Paris, J.G. Kaufman ASTM E-561 (1968): Measurement Donald
Recommended publications
  • Engineering Ethics – a Review
    Erik Jonsson School of Engggineering and The Un ivers ity o f Texas a t Da llas Computer Science Engineering Ethics – A Review • Engineers are professional practitioners (in the same way that lawyers and physicians are professionals) . • Although engineers may work for companies, non- profit organizations, or governmental units, many engineers, like MD’ s or a ttorneys, are in depen den t business people and work for clients. • All professions have guidelines for interacting with clients. • We as (electrical) engineers, have ethical guidelines as well, and we often refer to them as engineering ethics . 1 EE 1202 Lecture #3 – Ethics and Technical Competence © N. B. Dodge 03/12 Erik Jonsson School of Engggineering and The Un ivers ity o f Texas a t Da llas Computer Science Interaction Rules • Society has rules of conduct that govern personal and organizational interactions. • There are various levels of these rules or behavioral guidelines. For example: – Etiquette – Rules governing personal interaction; in general, the only penalty for breaking such rules is embarrassment. – Laws – Societal mandates of behavior, with consequent penalties for breaking those rules. – Morals – Principles or standards of behavior. In general, apply to the more serious behavioral issues in a society. 2 EE 1202 Lecture #3 – Ethics and Technical Competence © N. B. Dodge 03/12 Erik Jonsson School of Engggineering and The Un ivers ity o f Texas a t Da llas Computer Science Examples • Etiquette – Proper etiquette generally involves “proper” public behavior (which can vary with the society to which the etiquette applies): Dressing professionally, speaking well (face-to-face and over the telephone), and using proper table manners.
    [Show full text]
  • WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER, 2 Chair
    WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER, 2 finely-ground lenses of the sociology of work as developed by Anselm Strauss and refined by Leigh Star (1991:265) who wrote: 001. Publication Committee Meeting "Work is the link between the visible and the invisible." I focus 1:00 to 3:00 pm on three forms anticipation work which are often, though not Crowne Plaza: Savoy always, invisibled/deleted. First is abduction, the feedback loopings from empirical elements to conceptualizations of them 002. 4S Council Meeting through which we produce and perform anticipation, tracing 3:00 to 6:00 pm some of its roots in pragmatist philosophy and how guessing is Crowne Plaza: Savoy work. I then extend the process(es) of simplification as analyzed by Leigh Star (1983) vis-a-vis scientific work as a key process of 003. Welcome and Opening Remarks anticipation in largely non-scientific spaces and places. I discuss 6:15 to 6:30 pm how various kinds of work "disappear" through simplifying Crowne Plaza: Grand Ballroom - East strategies, noting the loss of complexities, and the shifting An overview of 4S conference 2011. politics of responsibility for doing anticipatory labor. Last, I Chair: touch on hope, attempting to specify how it threads itself into possible futures in relation to anticipation as fuel, as energy Roli Varma, University of New Mexico source, as drive, as process, as product. In conclusion, I discuss 004. Opening Plenary: The Intellectual Legacies of Susan Leigh the shifting politics of responsibility for doing anticipatory labor, Star especially in relation to its visibility. Who does it? Under what 6:30 to 7:30 pm conditions? With what kinds of recognition or invisibling? Why Crowne Plaza: Grand Ballroom - East might it matter when anticipatory labor is commonly invisible? Susan Leigh Star (1954–2010) Mapping the Body across Diverse Information Systems: Shadow Bodies and They Make Us Human.
    [Show full text]
  • Schnebele Gmu 0883E 10495.Pdf
    Fusion of Remote Sensing and Non-authoritative Data for Flood Disaster and Transportation Infrastructure Assessment A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at George Mason University By Emily K. Schnebele Master of Arts University of Maryland at College Park, 1994 Bachelor of Science University of Maryland at College Park, 1992 Director: Dr. Guido Cervone, Associate Professor Department of Geography and GeoInformation Science Fall Semester 2013 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Copyright c 2013 by Emily K. Schnebele All Rights Reserved ii Acknowledgments Although I am listed as the solitary author of this work, its completion would not have been possible without the insight, guidance, and encouragement from my advisor, Dr. Guido Cervone. I have been privileged to have such a talented scientist and researcher as my advisor and mentor. No matter how challenging the task, from technical help to moral support, he always came to my aid. I have truly enjoyed being his student and I am eternally grateful for everything he has done for me. I also would like to thank the members of my committee, Dr. Nigel Waters, Dr. Richard Medina, and Dr. Monica Gentili. I have been extremely fortunate to have a committee who cares so much about me and my work. Without fail, they responded to my questions and requests for help by providing insightful and valuable advice. In particular, I would like to thank Dr. Waters for hiring me as his Research Assistant; the experience has been invaluable and it has been a pleasure to work alongside such a generous and talented professor.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue #100 Technicaltidbits Materion Performance Alloys
    APRIL 2017 ISSUE #100 TECHNICALTIDBITS MATERION PERFORMANCE ALLOYS LEARNING FROM FAILURES AND ENGINEERING DISASTERS As an engineer, you can learn more from a single failure than Disasters frequently from 1000 successes. happen outside of This is especially true if the failure is your own design, • Dam collapses (South Fork Dam, Sayano- 1970’s Hollywood as the lessons are personal and deeply ingrained. Shushenskaya Dam, St. Francis Dam) movies. – Using However, you do not have to learn from your own • Failure of Levees around New Orleans during short-term testing to failures, as engineers, architects and designers have Hurricane Katrina been making design mistakes (and occasionally estimate long-term failure • Therac-25 overdoses goofing up royally) for millennia. The point here is not to learn to assign blame. It is After any engineering disaster, there is always an important to study not just how something failed, but inquiry to determine who or what was responsible. why it failed. Here are some key considerations to Failure Those approaching an inquiry from a legal point of look for when examining historical failures: view are most interested in finding out if anyone Engineering should be paying compensation and whether or • What decisions led to the failure? Disaster not criminal charges should be filed. Engineers can aid • Was a previously unknown natural phenomenon this effort as expert witnesses, but the most import- to blame (like aeroelastic flutter in the Tacoma ant role of the engineer is to find out exactly what Narrows Bridge collapse, or the trench effect in went wrong, so that the disaster is never repeated.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanchez Udel 0060D 1
    RADIOACTIVE REVERSAL? THE FUKUSHIMA ACCIDENT AS A FOCUSING EVENT FOR COMPARATIVE POLICY CHANGE ON NUCLEAR ENERGY by Victoria Justine Sanchez A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and International Relations. Summer 2017 © 2017 Victoria Justine Sanchez All Rights Reserved RADIOACTIVE REVERSAL? THE FUKUSHIMA ACCIDENT AS A FOCUSING EVENT FOR COMPARATIVE POLICY CHANGE ON NUCLEAR ENERGY by Victoria Justine Sanchez Approved: __________________________________________________________ David P. Redlawsk, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Political Science and International Relations Approved: __________________________________________________________ George H. Watson, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Approved: __________________________________________________________ Ann L. Ardis, Ph.D. Senior Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ Janet B. Johnson, Ph.D. Professor in charge of dissertation I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Dimensions of Disaster During Hurricane Katrina: Landscape
    Dimensions of Disaster During Hurricane Katrina: Landscape, Levees, and the Least Fortunate Sarah McKinnell Geography Department – Fall 2012 Professor William Travis – Head Advsior – Geography Department Professor Stefan Leyk – Geography Department Professor Mary Kraus – Geology Department Abstract: In 2005 Hurricane Katrina made landfall in Southeastern Louisiana as a powerful Category Three hurricane. The hurricane protection systems in place for the city of New Orleans and surrounding parishes were overwhelmed sending billions of gallons of water into local communities. This atypical flood volume inundated 80% of New Orleans, impeding rescue efforts and devastating infrastructure and emergency resources. Over 1,500 lives were lost and an estimated 125 billion US dollars were spent on emergency response, recovery, and reconstruction. Hurricane Katrina is the worst disaster in the United States in over a century. This paper analyzes why Hurricane Katrina was such a catastrophe. Three major reasons for disaster are identified: construction of piecemeal levee systems, wetland loss, and social vulnerabilities. Throughout the history of southeastern Louisiana’s settlement, the natural hydrography was manipulated in order to protect life and property from flooding; a fragmented levee system was constructed based on underestimated storm risk resulting in the hurricane protection system that failed during Hurricane Katrina. Similarly, increased residential development, canal building, and natural land subsidence processes have degraded natural wetlands which function as protective barriers from storm surges. The population of New Orleans exhibited high social vulnerabilities, as many Katrina victims lacked the tools, knowledge, and capabilities necessary to evacuate in a timely manner or to exercise other self-protective measures. These three elements—fragmented levee systems, wetland degradation, and high social vulnerabilities—exacerbate the level of vulnerability of property and people along the Gulf Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • COURSE DESCRIPTIONS Fall 2021 Bulletin
    UNDERGRADUATE COURSE DESCRIPTIONS Fall 2021 Bulletin and modern languages, the caste system An introduction to the stories, histories, and AAS and reform movements, Asohka, Akbar and aesthetics of Indian classical performing great emperors, impact of Islam and Western arts. The course focuses on Bharatanatyam, Asian & Asian American colonization, and Gandhi and the impact of the solo dance form from South India. Studies South Asia on the world. Kathakali, Manipuri, Odissi, and Kathak will be introduced to compare and contrast DEC: J AAS 102: Eastern Religions dance-theatre forms of South Asia. Students SBC: GLO Historical introduction to Hinduism, will be introduced to each performance form Buddhism, Confucianism, and Taoism. 3 credits by studying its ancient and modern history, Attention is given to the cultural background, practitioners, technique, stage presentation, AAS 209: Indian Classical Dance: art, literature, philosophy, and institutional and aesthetics. The course explores the Bharatanatyam development of each tradition. This course is commonalities of all these performing art offered as both AAS 102 and RLS 102. Introduction to the basics of Bharatanatyam forms including: mythology, the classic text: (South Indian classical dance) technique. Natya Shastra, abhinaya (mime) and the DEC: B Includes primary postures and basic steps, theory of rasa. Lessons will be accompanied SBC: GLO, HUM or adavus. Class also covers the theory of by suitable reading material and visual 3 credits Bharatanatyam including hand gestures, head, demonstrations either on video or by a neck and eye movements, as delineated in practitioner of the art form. AAS 110: Appreciating Indian Music Nandikeswara's Abhinaya Darpana. Students DEC: D An introduction to the basic elements of Indian will gain a well-rounded knowledge of the SBC: ARTS classical music, such as "raga" and "tala", dance by studying Bharatanatyam's form, "gharanas" (schools) and styles.
    [Show full text]
  • Compensating Victims of Bridge Collapses Outside Minnesota (2007)
    Compensating Victims of Bridge Collapses Outside Minnesota Peter S. Wattson Senate Counsel State of Minnesota November 9, 2007 2 Contents Introduction ................................................................ ii 1. Tacoma Narrows Bridge - Washington - November 7, 1940 ....................1 2. Silver Bridge - West Virginia - December 15, 1967 ...........................2 3. Mianus River Bridge - Connecticut - June 28, 1983 ...........................3 4. Schoharie Creek Bridge - New York - April 5, 1987 ..........................4 5. Hatchie River Bridge - Tennessee - April 1, 1989 .............................6 6. San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge and Cypress Structure - California - October 17, 1989 ...............................................................7 7. Little Red River Pedestrian Bridge - Arkansas - October 29, 1989 ..............9 8. I-40 Bridge Near Webbers Falls - Oklahoma - May 26, 2002 ..................10 Conclusion .................................................................11 Bridge Collapse Web Sites ....................................................12 i Introduction This paper describes how other states have compensated victims of bridge collapses that occurred before the Interstate 35W Bridge over the Mississippi River in Minneapolis collapsed on August 1, 2007. It includes bridges that collapsed in California, Connecticut, New York, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Washington, and West Virginia, from 1940 to 2002. The collapses and the state response to them are described in chronological order. They offer an
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Disasters: Learning from Failure
    Engineering Disasters: Learning from Failure N. Chawla School of Materials Fulton School of Engineering Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287-8706 [email protected] http://enpub.fulton.asu.edu/chawla/Home.htm (480) 965-2402 (phone) (480) 727-9321 (fax) Submitted to: TMS Education Resource Awards November 2007 Engineering Disasters: Learning from Failure • Engineering disasters have resulted in loss of life, injuries, and billions of dollars in damage. • Primary causes for engineering disasters: – Design flaws – Material failures – Extreme conditions or environments (not necessarily preventable) – Some combinations of the reasons above. • Three major disasters: – Sinking of the ship Titanic – Collapse of the World Trade Center buildings – Explosion of the Space Shuttle Columbia Chronology of Events Leading to Sinking of the Titanic • Titanic began its maiden voyage to New York at noon on April 10, 1912, from Southampton, England. • On night of April 14, at 11:40 p.m., crew sighted an iceberg immediately ahead of ship. • In about 40 seconds it collided with an iceberg estimated to have a gross weight of 150,000-300,000 tons. • Iceberg struck the Titanic near bow and raked side of ship's hull damaging hull plates and popping rivets, • At 2:20 a.m., April 15, 1912, Titanic sank within two hours and 40 minutes, with the loss of more than 1,500 lives. Why did the Titanic sink? • Theory 1 Multiple rivet failures upon collision with iceberg. • Theory 2 Failure of the steel hull upon collision with iceberg. Remains of the Titanic Theory 1: Multiple wrought-Fe rivet failures upon collision with iceberg.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Shuttle Case Studies: Challenger and Columbia
    Paper ID #8419 Space Shuttle Case Studies: Challenger and Columbia Dr. Scott L Post, Bradley University Scott Post received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University. He is currently an Asso- ciate Professor at Bradley University in Peoria, IL. He has previously worked as an Assistant Professor at Michigan Technological University. He has also been a summer Faculty Fellow at NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, and a Visiting Erskine Fellow at the University of Canterbury in Christchurch, New Zealand. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Space Shuttle Case Studies: Challenger and Columbia Abstract The two Space Shuttle tragedies, Challenger and Columbia, have led to many papers on case studies on engineering ethics. The Challenger disaster in particular is often discussed due to the infamous teleconference that took place the night before the launch in which some engineers tried to postpone the launch. However, the space shuttle program itself is worthy of study as it relates to the engineering design process, and the details of the Challenger and Columbia disasters are worthy of discussion as they relate to a variety of sub-disciplines, including material science, thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, and heat transfer. This paper summarizes the major technical findings of the Rogers Commission and the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB). An overview of the history of the space shuttle program, going back to the end of the Apollo program, is presented, including some of the design compromises that were made in order to get political support for the space shuttle program. A detailed bibliography is given that will aid instructors in finding additional material they can tailor to their particular class needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Fracture Mechanics
    Introduction to Fracture Mechanics David Roylance Department of Materials Science and Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 June 14, 2001 Introduction In 1983, the National Bureau of Standards (now the National Institute for Science and Tech- nology) and Battelle Memorial Institute1 estimated the costs for failure due to fracture to be $119 billion per year in 1982 dollars. The dollars are important, but the cost of many failures in human life and injury is infinitely more so. Failures have occurred for many reasons, including uncertainties in the loading or envi- ronment, defects in the materials, inadequacies in design, and deficiencies in construction or maintenance. Design against fracture has a technology of its own, and this is a very active area of current research. This module will provide an introduction to an important aspect of this field, since without an understanding of fracture the methods in stress analysis discussed previously would be of little use. We will focus on fractures due to simple tensile overstress, but the designer is cautioned again about the need to consider absolutely as many factors as possible that might lead to failure, especially when life is at risk. The Module on the Dislocation Basis of Yield (Module 21) shows how the strength of struc- tural metals – particularly steel – can be increased to very high levels by manipulating the microstructure so as to inhibit dislocation motion. Unfortunately, this renders the material in- creasingly brittle, so that cracks can formand propagate catastrophically with very little warn- ing. An unfortunate number of engineering disasters are related directly to this phenomenon, and engineers involved in structural design must be aware of the procedures now available to safeguard against brittle fracture.
    [Show full text]
  • Levees, Urbanization and Public Perception: Implications for Southeast Louisiana Wetlands
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses 8-6-2009 Levees, Urbanization and Public Perception: Implications for Southeast Louisiana Wetlands Jacquelyn Marchand University of New Orleans Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Recommended Citation Marchand, Jacquelyn, "Levees, Urbanization and Public Perception: Implications for Southeast Louisiana Wetlands" (2009). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 983. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/983 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Levees, Urbanization and Public Perception: Implications for Southeast Louisiana Wetlands A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Geography by Jacquelyn Ann Marchand B.A. University of New Orleans,
    [Show full text]