DOCSLIB.ORG

“The Law, the Prophets, and the Other Books of the Fathers” (Sir, Prologue) Canonical Lists in Ben Sira and Elsewhere?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“The Law, the Prophets, and the Other Books of the Fathers” (Sir, Prologue) Canonical Lists in Ben Sira and Elsewhere? “THE LAW, THE PROPHETS, AND THE OTHER BOOKS OF THE FATHERS” (SIR, PROLOGUE) CANONICAL LISTS IN BEN SIRA AND ELSEWHERE? Armin Lange (University of Vienna) Since the beginnings of critical research in the book of Ecclesiasticus, scholars understood its Greek prologue as referring to the three parts of the later Hebrew canon1 or to a comparable tripartite collection of scriptures.2 1 See e.g H.B. Swete, An Introduction to the Old Testament in Greek (ed. R.R. Ottley, with an Appendix Containing the Letter of Aristeas by H.S.T. Thackeray, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1902) 24; A. Eberharter, Der Kanon des Alten Testaments zur Zeit des Ben Sira: Auf Grund der Beziehungen des Sirachbuches zu den Schriften des A. T. dargestellt (ATA 3.3, Münster: Aschendorff 1911) 2-4, 52-54; O. Eissfeldt, Einleitung in das Alte Testament unter Einschluß der Apokryphen und Pseudepigraphen sowie der apo- kryphen- und pseudepigraphenarten Qumrānschriften: Entstehungsgeschichte des Alten Tes- taments (3rd ed., Neue theologische Grundrisse, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 1964) 766-67; J.C.H. Lebram, “Aspekte der alttestamentlichen Kanonbildung,” VT 18 (1968) 173-89, 175; J.G. Snaith, Ecclesiasticus or the Wisdom of Jesus Son of Sirach (CBC, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1974) 8; S.Z. Leiman, The Canonization of Hebrew Scripture: The Talmudic and Midrashic Evidence (TCAAS 47, Hamden: Archon Books 1976) 29; R.A.F. MacKenzie, Sirach (OTM 19, Wilmington: Glazier 1983) 20-21; R.T. Beckwith, The Old Testament Canon of the New Testament Church and its Background in Early Judaism (London: SPCK 1985) 110-11; idem, “The Formation of the Hebrew Bible,” in Mikra: Text, Translation, Reading and Interpretation of the Hebrew Bible in Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity (eds. M.J. Mulder and H. Sysling, CRINT 2.1, Assen: Van Gorcum 1988) 39-86, 52; H. Burkhardt, Die Inspiration heiliger Schriften bei Philo von Alexandrien (2nd ed., Giessen: Brunnenverlag 1992), 138-39; H.M. Orlinsky, “Some Terms in the Prologue to Ben Sira and the Hebrew Canon,” JBL 110 (1991) 483-90; L.H. Schiffman, Reclaiming the Dead Sea Scrolls: The History of Judaism, the Background of Christianity, the Lost Library of Qumran (Philadelphia: JPS 1994) 164; H.-J. Fabry, “Die Qumrantexte und das biblische Kanonproblem,” in Recht und Ethos im Alten Testament—Gestalt und Wir- kung: Festschrift für Horst Seebass zum 65. Geburtstag (Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag 1999) 251-71, 252, 266; P. Brandt, Endgestalten des Kanons: Das Arrangement der Schriften Israels in der jüdischen und christlichen Bibel (BBB 131, Berlin: Philo 2001) 69-70, 121; G. Steins, Die Chronik als kanonisches Abschlußphänomen: Studien zur Entstehung und Theologie von 1/2Chronik (BBB 93, Weinheim: Beltz Athenäum 1995) 512; G. Sauer, Jesus Sirach / Ben Sira: Übersetzt und erklärt (ATD Apokryphen 1, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2000) 37-38; J. Marböck, “Text und Übersetzung—Horizonte einer Ausle- 56 ARMIN LANGE Good examples are the commentary of Patrick W. Skehan and Alexander A. Di Lella and the remarks of James C. VanderKam: Here for the first time mention is made of the threefold division of the OT: the Law, Heb tôrâ,= the Prophets, Heb nĕbî’îm, and “the later authors,” or the other books of our ancestors”…, or “the rest of the books”… The third division, referred to in a somewhat general way by the grandson, came to be known later as the Writings, Heb kĕtûbîm. The Jews today still use these three divisions, calling the OT as a whole Tanak…3 These statements show that the grandson was obviously familiar with a threefold division of the ancestral books, a division not dissimilar from the later law-pro- phets-writings arrangement of the Hebrew Bible.4 Alternatively, the prologue to Ecclesiasticus was read as referring to a bipar- tite canon of law and prophets (sometimes regarded as not closed) while the other books mentioned would designate non-canonical Jewish texts.5 gung im Prolog zum Griechischen Sirach,” in Horizonte biblischer Texte, FS J.M. Oesch (OBO 196, Fribourg: Academic Press Fribourg 2003) 109-11. 2 A.G. Sundberg, “The Septuagint: The Bible of Hellenistic Judaism,” in The Canon Debate (eds. L.M. McDonald and J.A. Sanders, Peabody: Hendrickson 2002) 68-90, 80- 81; idem, The Old Testament of the Early Church (HTS 20, Cambridge: Harvard Univer- sity Press 1964) 67-69; A. van der Kooij, “Canonization of Ancient Hebrew Books and Hasmonean Politics,” in The Biblical Canons (eds. J.-M. Auwers and H.J. de Jonge, BETL 163, Leuven: Peeters 2003) 27-38; cf. idem, “The Canonization of Ancient Books Kept in the Temple of Jerusalem,” in Canonization and Decanonization: Papers Presented to the International Conference of the Leiden Institute for the Study of Religions (LISOR), Held at Leiden 9-10 January 1997 (eds. A. van der Kooij and K. van der Toorn, SHR 82, Leiden: Brill 1998) 17-40, 23-24. 3 P.W. Skehan and A.A. Di Lella, The Wisdom of Ben Sira: A New Translation with Notes (AB 39, New York: Doubleday 1987) 133. 4 J.C. VanderKam, “Revealed Literature in the Second Temple Period,” in idem, From Revelation to Canon: Studies in the Hebrew Bible and Second Temple Literature (JSJSup 62, Leiden: Brill 2000) 1-30, 6; cf. also idem, The Dead Sea Scrolls Today (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans 1994) 143-44. 5 See e.g. H. Graetz, Kohelet tlhq oder der Salomonische Prediger: Übersetzt und Kri- tisch Erläutert (Leipzig: Winter 1871) 151-52; T.N. Swanson, The Closing of the Collection of Holy Scriptures: A Study in the History of the Canonization of the Old Testament (Ph.D. diss., Nashville: Vanderbilt University 1970) 125-31; J. Barton, Oracles of God: Percep- tions of Ancient Prophecy in Israel after the Exile (New York: Oxford University Press 1986) 47-48; J.G. Campbell, “4QMMTd and the Tripartite Canon,” JSJ 51 (2000) 181-90, 187: J.C. Trebolle Barrera, “Origins of a Tripartite Old Testament Canon,” in The Canon Debate, 128-45, 129; P. Flint, “Scriptures in the Dead Sea Scrolls: The Evidence from Qumran,” in Emanuel: Studies in Hebrew Bible, Septuagint, and Dead Sea Scrolls in Honor of Emanuel Tov (eds. S.M. Paul et al., VTSup 94, Leiden: Brill 2003) 269-304, 280; E. Ulrich, “The Non-attestation of a Tripartite Canon in 4QMMT,” CBQ 65 (2003) 202-14, 211-13; idem, “Qumran and the Canon of the Old Testament,” in The Biblical Canons, 57-80, 71. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Syllabus, Deuterocanonical Books
    The Deuterocanonical Books (Tobit, Judith, 1 & 2 Maccabees, Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, and additions to Daniel & Esther) Caravaggio. Saint Jerome Writing (oil on canvas), c. 1605-1606. Galleria Borghese, Rome. with Dr. Bill Creasy Copyright © 2021 by Logos Educational Corporation. All rights reserved. No part of this course—audio, video, photography, maps, timelines or other media—may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage or retrieval devices without permission in writing or a licensing agreement from the copyright holder. Scripture texts in this work are taken from the New American Bible, revised edition © 2010, 1991, 1986, 1970 Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, Washington, D.C. and are used by permission of the copyright owner. All Rights Reserved. No part of the New American Bible may be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the copyright owner. 2 The Deuterocanonical Books (Tobit, Judith, 1 & 2 Maccabees, Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, and additions to Daniel & Esther) Traditional Authors: Various Traditional Dates Written: c. 250-100 B.C. Traditional Periods Covered: c. 250-100 B.C. Introduction The Deuterocanonical books are those books of Scripture written (for the most part) in Greek that are accepted by Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches as inspired, but they are not among the 39 books written in Hebrew accepted by Jews, nor are they accepted as Scripture by most Protestant denominations. The deuterocanonical books include: • Tobit • Judith • 1 Maccabees • 2 Maccabees • Wisdom (also called the Wisdom of Solomon) • Sirach (also called Ecclesiasticus) • Baruch, (including the Letter of Jeremiah) • Additions to Daniel o “Prayer of Azariah” and the “Song of the Three Holy Children” (Vulgate Daniel 3: 24- 90) o Suzanna (Daniel 13) o Bel and the Dragon (Daniel 14) • Additions to Esther Eastern Orthodox churches also include: 3 Maccabees, 4 Maccabees, 1 Esdras, Odes (which include the “Prayer of Manasseh”) and Psalm 151.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Identity in the Letter of Aristeas Noah Hacham (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem) and Lilach Sagiv (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem)*
    Social Identity in the Letter of Aristeas Noah Hacham (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem) and Lilach Sagiv (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem)* The Letter of Aristeas has long been considered the work most emblematic, elucidatory and de- clarative of Jewish identity in Hellenistic Egypt. The work embraces emphatically Jewish content alongside a profound identification with Hellenistic concepts, ideas and frameworks. This com- plexity has intrigued scholars and it continues to do so as they attempt to qualify the essential identity that the author of the Letter of Aristeas seeks to promote and to transmit. The question of identity is two-faceted: First, it explores the nature of the affinity between the Jewish and Hellenistic components in the doctrine advocated by the Letter of Aristeas. Second, it strives to identify the threat and the danger that the author confronts and deplores. In our discussion we aim to provide answers to these questions. Furthermore, we introduce a new conceptualiza- tion of the way the Letter of Aristeas combines and “manages” the various identities and their constituent details. For that aim, we draw on models from the realm of social psychology, which we have found to be eminently useful in understanding the complex and dynamic nature of the identities of Antique Jewry. We reason that considering models of social identity could provide us with a fresh perspective of the text, which allows for a new understanding of the complex and dynamic nature of the identities as they appear in the Letter of Aristeas. Introduction The Letter of Aristeas has long been considered the work most emblematic, elucidatory, and declarative of Jewish identity in Hellenistic Egypt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Apocrypha Donald E
    What are Protestants Missing? The Apocrypha Donald E. Knebel November 27, 2016 Slide 1 1. This is the first in a series of four presentations that will look at Jewish literature written between the end of events in the Old Testament and the writing of the New Testament. 2. These writings help to bridge the large historical and theological gap between the Old and New Testaments. 3. As one author writes: “The fact is that the atmosphere in which the New Testament is written is in large part the product of the period between the testaments, and no amount of study of the Old Testament can solely explain it.” Surburg, Introduction to the Intertestamental Period at 9. 4. Today, we will talk about the Apocrypha, books included in the Bibles of Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox Christians but omitted from most Protestant Bibles. 5. Next week we will look at a collection of Jewish writings called Pseudepigrapha, one of which is actually quoted in the New Testament and several of which were relied upon by New Testament writers. 6. In the third week, we will look at the Dead Sea Scrolls, which have shed enormous light on Jewish beliefs at the time of Jesus and show great similarities to many Christian beliefs. 7. Finally we will look at the writings of Jewish contemporaries of Jesus and the New Testament writers, including Philo and Josephus. 8. Over the course of this series, we will see that the New Testament and Christian teachings draw a lot more on Jewish ideas and Jewish expressions than most Christians realize.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book of Enoch in the Light of the Qumran Wisdom Literature
    CHAPTER FIVE THE BOOK OF ENOCH IN THE LIGHT OF THE QUMRAN WISDOM LITERATURE I The Book of Watchers is now regarded as the earliest apocalypse that we possess, and the Book of Enoch as a whole as a prime example of the apocalyptic genre, a major source for our understanding of apocalyp- ticism. The apocalyptic genre is, of course, traditionally regarded as representing a continuation of prophecy, and the Book of Enoch does make use of prophetic genres in a variety of ways. It is also of inter- est to note that the quotation of 1:9 in Jude 14–15 is introduced by the statement that Enoch “prophesied” about the heretics condemned by Jude, and that in Ethiopian tradition of a much later age Enoch is called the fi rst of the prophets. But in the Book of Enoch itself, Enoch is described as a scribe and a wise man, and his writings as the source of wisdom, and although the book cannot in any sense be regarded as a conventional wisdom book, this inevitably raises the question of the relationship of the book to ‘wisdom’ and the wisdom literature. Within the last decade Randall Argall and Ben Wright have attempted to answer this question by comparing 1 Enoch with Sirach. Thus in a recent monograph, 1 Enoch and Sirach: A Comparative Literary and Conceptual Analysis of the Themes of Revelation, Creation and Judgment, Argall argued that there are similarities in the way 1 Enoch and Sirach treat the themes of revelation, creation, and judgment, and “that their respective views were formulated, at least in part, over against one another.”1 Ben Wright has taken views like this further and has argued that Ben Sira actively took the side of the temple priests in polemical opposition against those, such as the authors of the Book of Watchers, who criticized them.2 He, like 1 Randall A.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesus and Second Temple Judaism
    SCJR 14, no. 1 (2019): 1-3 Ben C. Blackwell, John K. Goodrich, and Jason Maston, Eds. Reading Mark in Context: Jesus and Second Temple Judaism (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2018), 286 pp. NICHOLAS A. ELDER [email protected] Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53233 Reading Mark in Context is a collection of thirty essays that sequentially in- terprets passages in Mark with specific reference to relevant Second Temple Jewish texts. The volume includes a foreword by N. T. Wright that notes its dual purpose, which is to (1) introduce the reader to Jewish texts from the Second Temple period and (2) provide a “running commentary” on Mark in light of those texts (pp. 14– 15). Preceding the collection’s thirty essays is an introduction from the editors that serves several functions. First, they briefly review historical Jesus scholarship in order to highlight the importance of non-canonical Second Temple Jewish texts for understanding Jesus as he is presented in the gospels. Second, they identify the kind of readers that the volume is primarily intended for, namely beginning to interme- diate students who are evangelical. Third, it offers an introduction to the Second Temple period with reference to major events and writings. As a whole, the collection of essays is well-balanced. Each contribution is ap- proximately seven pages long and is evenly divided between an introduction to a Second Temple Jewish text and an interpretation of Mark in light of that text. A broad swath of Second Temple literature is represented, including the Letter of Aristeas, the Psalms of Solomon, 4 Ezra, the Book of Jubilees, 1 Maccabees, 2 Maccabees, and various texts from Qumran, Philo, Josephus, Rabbinic literature, and the Enochic corpus.
    [Show full text]
  • Is New Moon Full Moon?
    Is New Moon Full Moon? Shalom. We should all have the unwavering desire to serve and please Alohym and keep his commandments, (Ecclesiastes 12:13) for this is the duty of Man. In this note study we have supplied Scripture as a first witness and several other witnesses of which are Historical and Scriptorial that expose the theory of New Moon being Full Moon. As we continue to Learn, Study and Pray in truth we move closer to Alohym and forward in service to him. In the book of Beginnings we can see that Alohym made the Sun & Moon with a PURPOSE in creation. The moon was created to divide the day from the night, to be a sign, to govern his appointed time of meeting, to number days and years, and to rule over the night and stars. It was called the lesser LIGHT, in comparison to the sun, the greater LIGHT. What is New Moon: In light of recent events, there seem to be somewhat of a confusion as to when New Moon is, what Chodesh is and how this relates to the appointed times of our Creator. So, to keep it very simple, let’s begin with New Moon. In Hebrew, the word for NEW is: Chadash. This word varies depending on how it’s used. When it’s used as a VERB, CHADASH H2318 is then used to describe the Verb. When this verb is used in Conjunction with the Moon, its s describing an event that’s taking place. The Moon is: REBUILDING AND/OR REPAIRNG its light.
    [Show full text]
  • Table O F Contents
    Table of Contents Preface V Abbreviations and Formal Guidelines XIII Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1. The Problem and the Task 1 1.1 The Marginalisation of Jewish Letter Writing in New Testament Scholarship 1 1.2 The Study of Ancient Jewish Letters and the Need for a New Investigation 5 1.3 The Scope and Structure of the Present Study 15 2. Some Theoretical Assumptions Regarding Letters 18 2.1 Letters as 'Form of Communication' or 'Basic Text Type' 18 2.2 Letters versus Epistles, Or: What Is a Letter? 20 2.3 A Theoretical Model for Epistolary Communication 25 Chapter 2: Ancient Jewish Documentary Letters 28 1. Aramaic Documentary Letters from Elephantine 28 1.1 Introduction 28 1.2 Formal and Formulaic Features of the Elephantine Letters 29 1.3 Letter Topics and Pragmatic Functions of Elephantine Letters 34 1.4 Conclusion 43 2. Aramaic Ostracon Letters of the 4th and 3rd Century BCE 44 3. Documentary Letters from Qumran and Jerusalem? 47 4. Aramaic Documentary Letters from Masada 54 5. Documentary Letters from the Bar Kokhba War 58 5.1 Introduction 58 5.2 Themes, Personae, and Register ofthe 'Bar Kokhba Letters' 61 5.3 Formal and Formulaic Features of the 'Bar Kokhba Letters' 72 5.4 Conclusion 78 6. Greek Documentary Letters Authored by Jews 80 6.1 Greek Documentary Letters Found at Masada 82 6.2 Greek Documentary Letters Found in Egypt 83 http://d-nb.info/1026540348 VIII Table ofContents 6.2.1 Letters Collected in CP J. 85 6.2.2 Letters from the Jewish Politeuma at Herakleopolis 92 6.3 Conclusion 95 Chapter 3: Letters in the Hebrew Bible and the Greek Scriptures 96 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wisdom of Jesus the Son of Sirach, Ecclesiasticus
    1 THE WISDOM OF JESUS THE SON OF SIRACH, OR ECCLESIASTICUS The Wisdom of Jesus the Son of Sirach, also called Ecclesias- ticus, is recognized as Deuterocanonical Scripture by the Roman Catholic, Greek Orthodox, and Russian Orthodox Churches. The Prologue of the Wisdom of Jesus the Son of Sirach. WHEREAS many and great things have been delivered to us by the law and the prophets, and by the others that have followed in their steps, for which we must give Israel the praise for instruction and wisdom; and since not only the readers need to become skillful themselves, but also those who love learning must be able to profit those who are outside, both by speaking and writing; my grandfather Jesus, having much given himself to the reading of the law, and the prophets, and the other books of our fathers, and having gained great familiarity with them, was also drawn on himself to write somewhat pertaining to instruction and wisdom, in order that those who love learning, and are devoted to these things, might make progress much more by living according to the law. You are entreated therefore to read with favor and attention, and to pardon us, if in any parts of what we have labored to interpret, we may seem to fail in some of the phrases. For things originally spoken in Hebrew don’t have the same force in them when they are translated into another language. Not only these, but the law itself, and the prophecies, and the rest of the books, have no small difference, when they are spoken in their original Sirach 1:1 2 Sirach 1:9 language.
    [Show full text]
  • Temple Ideology in the Writings of Jewish Alexandria
    TEMPLE IDEOLOGY IN THE WRITINGS OF JEWISH ALEXANDRIA by PHILIP HAROLD EDWARD SCRIBER III (Under the Direction of David S. Williams) ABSTRACT This paper attempts to demonstrate the ways in which Philo and the writers of 3 Maccabees, the Letter of Aristeas and the Wisdom of Solomon used the tools of Greek philosophy and Jewish culture. After a summary of the social and literary relationship of the Alexandrian community to Jerusalem and the Temple there, a close reading of the four authors' works reveals the ways which the idea of Temple ties the Jews to their brethren in Palestine and to the Greek world which surrounded them. INDEX WORDS: Alexandria, Judaism, Temple, Jerusalem, 3 Maccabees, Philo, Aristeas, Wisdom of Solomon, Platonism, Stoicism TEMPLE IDEOLOGY IN THE WRITINGS OF JEWISH ALEXANDRIA by PHILIP HAROLD EDWARD SCRIBER III B.A., Berry College, 2003 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2009 © 2009 Philip Scriber III All Rights Reserved TEMPLE IDEOLOGY IN THE WRITINGS OF JEWISH ALEXANDRIA by PHILIP HAROLD EDWARD SCRIBER III Major Professor: David Williams Committee: Carolyn Jones-Medine Sandy Martin Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia December 2009 iv DEDICATION To J. May this be worthy of your faith in me. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • My Brothers and Sisters, Both Today's Reading from Sirach and Today's
    22nd Sunday per Annum - C Sirach 3:17-18, 20, 28-29; Hebrews 12:18-19, 22-24a; Luke 14:1, 7-14 Little Flower - 9/1/19 My Brothers and Sisters, Both today’s reading from Sirach and today’s Gospel focus on the virtue of humility. The book of Sirach is part of the Wisdom literature of the Bible. As I mentioned in last week’s homily, the Wisdom literature offers all kinds of practical insights into real life. The reading from Sirach begins, “My child, conduct your affairs with humility.” I would suggest humility is the recognition that we are not self-made men or women. It is the recognition that all that we are and all that we have are God’s gifts to us either directly or indirectly through others. As much as adolescents and young adults try to be independent and self-sufficient, the truth is that human beings are interdependent. Sirach advises, “Humble yourself the more, the greater you are.” There is practical wisdom in this advice. The more we are rich, famous, attractive, intelligent, athletic, or successful, the more we are tempted to think we are self-made. It is often much harder for gifted people and high achievers to be humble. True humility requires gratitude and generosity. I have told this story before, but it is worth telling again. One time I was talking to a minister who was the father of that year’s Brownsburg High School valedictorian. When I congratulated him and his wife on their daughter’s achievements and valedictory address, he said, “My wife and I are humbly grateful.” He went on to explain that both he and his wife recognized how many people contributed to their daughter’s success.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudepigrapha Bibliographies
    0 Pseudepigrapha Bibliographies Bibliography largely taken from Dr. James R. Davila's annotated bibliographies: http://www.st- andrews.ac.uk/~www_sd/otpseud.html. I have changed formatting, added the section on 'Online works,' have added a sizable amount to the secondary literature references in most of the categories, and added the Table of Contents. - Lee Table of Contents Online Works……………………………………………………………………………………………...02 General Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………...…03 Methodology……………………………………………………………………………………………....03 Translations of the Old Testament Pseudepigrapha in Collections…………………………………….…03 Guide Series…………………………………………………………………………………………….....04 On the Literature of the 2nd Temple Period…………………………………………………………..........04 Literary Approaches and Ancient Exegesis…………………………………………………………..…...05 On Greek Translations of Semitic Originals……………………………………………………………....05 On Judaism and Hellenism in the Second Temple Period…………………………………………..…….06 The Book of 1 Enoch and Related Material…………………………………………………………….....07 The Book of Giants…………………………………………………………………………………..……09 The Book of the Watchers…………………………………………………………………………......….11 The Animal Apocalypse…………………………………………………………………………...………13 The Epistle of Enoch (Including the Apocalypse of Weeks)………………………………………..…….14 2 Enoch…………………………………………………………………………………………..………..15 5-6 Ezra (= 2 Esdras 1-2, 15-16, respectively)……………………………………………………..……..17 The Treatise of Shem………………………………………………………………………………..…….18 The Similitudes of Enoch (1 Enoch 37-71)…………………………………………………………..…...18 The
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Deuterocanon Deny Its Own
    “The Books Themselves Do Not Claim Inspiration” Objection #1: “The Deuterocanon never claims to be inspired. Therefore, they cannot be part of the sacred canon of Scripture.” Answer: Must every inspired text claim inspiration? A quick perusal of the Protocanon of the Old and New Testament reveals that only a few texts do so. In fact, most of the Protocanondo not show any hint that they were written under the influence of the Holy Spirit. The claim of inspiration, therefore, is not an essential prerequisite for inspiration. Otherwise, most of the books in our Bible would be rejected. What about those books that do claim inspiration? The claim of inspiration does not mean that a document is inspired. Both the Muslim Koran and the Book of Mormon claim inspiration. Should Christians consider them inspired? Is the Book of Baruch (which many early Christians believe to be part of the Book of Jeremiah) really less likely to be Scripture than the Book of Mormon because of the claim alone? If we take this objection seriously, we are forced to admit just that. No one can seriously entertain this objection as a legitimate test for canonicity. Rather, it is usually used as tag-on argument to other more worthy objections. The “claim of inspiration” objection is more of an insinuation than an argument. It makes Catholics and Orthodox look as if they are claiming something more for these books then the books do for themselves. Which is true, but the same can be said for most of the Protocanon! Indeed, if we are looking at the numbers, the Deuterocanon (without its claim of inspiration) is more like the Protocanon whose majority of text do not claim inspiration.
    [Show full text]