DOCSLIB.ORG

The Implementation of Open Access Oral and Written Evidence Contents 1994 Group – Written Evidence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Implementation of Open Access Oral and Written Evidence Contents 1994 Group – Written Evidence SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SELECT COMMITTEE The implementation of open access Oral and Written evidence Contents 1994 Group – Written evidence ............................................................................................................. 5 Academy of Social Sciences – Written evidence ................................................................................. 8 Association for Learning Technology (ALT) – Written evidence ................................................. 13 Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers (ALPSP) – Written evidence .... 19 Jeffrey Beall, Scholarly Initiatives Librarian, University of Colorado Denver – Written evidence ...................................................................................................................................................... 24 Dr Rick Bradford – Written evidence ................................................................................................ 25 British Academy – Written evidence .................................................................................................. 27 British Heart Foundation (BHF) – Written evidence ...................................................................... 32 British Medical Journal Group (BMJ) – Written evidence .............................................................. 34 British Psychological Society (BPS) – Written evidence ................................................................. 38 British Sociological Association (BSA) – Written evidence............................................................ 41 Abby Clobridge, Clobridge Consulting – Written evidence .......................................................... 46 Dr Stephen Curry, Imperial College London – Written evidence ............................................... 47 Dr Paola Di Maio, ISTCS.org – Written evidence ............................................................................ 51 Economic History Society – Written evidence ................................................................................. 55 Electronic Publishing Trust for Development – Written evidence .............................................. 59 Emerald Group Publishing Limited – Written evidence .................................................................. 62 Dame Janet Finch and Dr Michael Jubb, Working Group on Expanding Access to Research Publications – Written evidence ........................................................................................................... 67 Professor Dame Janet Finch – Oral evidence (QQ 1-16) ............................................................... 74 Frederick J. Friend, University College London – Written evidence ........................................... 87 Dr Rita Gardner, Steven Hall and the Publishers Association – Oral evidence (QQ 38-51) . 90 Geological Society of London (GSL) – Written evidence .............................................................. 91 Government – the Rt Hon David Willetts MP, Minister of State for Universities and Science, Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS) – Written evidence .................................. 94 Government – the Rt Hon David Willetts MP, Minister of State for Universities and Science, Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS) – Oral evidence (QQ 71-83) ............... 114 Government – the Rt Hon David Willetts MP, Minister of State for Universities and Science, Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS) – Supplementary written evidence ..... 124 1 Steven Hall, the Publishers Association and Dr Rita Gardner – Oral evidence (QQ 38-51) .................................................................................................................................................................... 133 Steve Hall, Institute of Physics (IOP) Publishing – Supplementary written evidence .............. 146 Professor Stevan Harnad, University of Southampton, Université du Québec à Montréal and McGill University – Written evidence ............................................................................................... 148 Hellenic and Roman Societies – Written evidence ........................................................................ 153 Emeritus Professor John R Helliwell, University of Manchester – Written evidence ............ 155 Professor Tony Hey, Microsoft Research – Written evidence ................................................... 160 Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) – Written evidence ........................ 172 Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) and Research Councils UK (RCUK) – Oral evidence (QQ 52-70) ............................................................................................................... 175 Human Relations – Written evidence ............................................................................................... 176 Imperial College London, University of Oxford and University of Bournemouth – Oral evidence (QQ 17-37) ............................................................................................................................ 178 Institute of Physics (IoP) – Written evidence .................................................................................. 179 International Society for First World War Studies – Written evidence ................................... 183 International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development (ISSBD) – Written evidence .................................................................................................................................................................... 189 John Innes Centre and the Sainsbury Laboratory – Written evidence ...................................... 192 Dr Michael Jubb and Dame Janet Finch, Working Group on Expanding Access to Research Publications – Written evidence ......................................................................................................... 193 Dr Paul Kirby, University of Sussex and Dr Meera Sabaratnam, University of Cambridge – Written evidence ................................................................................................................................... 194 London Higher ‘Research Excellence Group’ – Written evidence ............................................ 200 London Mathematical Society – Written evidence ........................................................................ 202 Dr Peter J. Matthews, National Museum of Ethnology, Japan – Written evidence ................ 206 Dr Heather Morrison – Written evidence ...................................................................................... 209 Ross Mounce, PhD student, University of Bath – Written evidence ......................................... 213 Dr Tom Olijhoek – Written evidence .............................................................................................. 219 Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA) – Written evidence ....................... 221 Open Book Publishers CIC Ltd – Written evidence ..................................................................... 227 Open Humanities Press – Written evidence ................................................................................... 230 Operational Research Society (ORS) – Written evidence ........................................................... 233 PLOS – Written evidence .................................................................................................................... 235 Political Studies Association of the UK – Written evidence ........................................................ 243 The Publishers Association – Written evidence ............................................................................. 248 2 The Publishers Association, Dr Rita Gardner and Steven Hall – Oral evidence (QQ 38-51) .................................................................................................................................................................... 255 Reed Elsevier – Written evidence ...................................................................................................... 256 Regional Studies Association (RSA) – Written evidence .............................................................. 260 Research Libraries UK (RLUK) – Written evidence ...................................................................... 264 Research Councils UK (RCUK) – Written evidence ..................................................................... 269 Research Councils UK (RCUK) and Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) – Oral evidence (QQ 52-70) ............................................................................................................... 281 Research Councils UK (RCUK) – Supplementary written evidence ......................................... 299 Royal Astronomical Society – Written evidence ............................................................................ 318 Royal Historical Society of the UK (RHS) – Written evidence ................................................... 322 The Royal Society – Written evidence ............................................................................................. 327 Royal Statistical Society (RSS) – Written evidence ........................................................................ 330 Dr Meera Sabaratnam, University of Cambridge and Dr Paul Kirby, University of Sussex – Written evidence ..................................................................................................................................
Load more
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

414 pages remaining, click to load more.

Recommended publications
  • Metabolic Footprinting and Systems Biology: the Medium Is the Message
    Nature Reviews Microbiology | AOP, published online 10 June 2005; doi:10.1038/nrmicro1177 REVIEWS METABOLIC FOOTPRINTING AND SYSTEMS BIOLOGY: THE MEDIUM IS THE MESSAGE Douglas B. Kell*, Marie Brown*, Hazel M. Davey‡, Warwick B. Dunn*, Irena Spasic* and Stephen G. Oliver§ Abstract | One element of classical systems analysis treats a system as a black or grey box, the inner structure and behaviour of which can be analysed and modelled by varying an internal or external condition, probing it from outside and studying the effect of the variation on the external observables. The result is an understanding of the inner make-up and workings of the system. The equivalent of this in biology is to observe what a cell or system excretes under controlled conditions — the ‘metabolic footprint’ or exometabolome — as this is readily and accurately measurable. Here, we review the principles, experimental approaches and scientific outcomes that have been obtained with this useful and convenient strategy. The METABOLOME is defined as the quantitative comple- either the transcriptome or proteome. This is because ment of low-molecular-weight metabolites present in the activities of metabolic pathways are reflected a cell under a given set of physiological conditions1–9. more accurately in the concentrations of pools of It lends itself readily to functional genomic and other metabolites than in the concentrations of the relevant analyses, as changes in a cell’s physiology as a result of enzymes (or indeed the concentrations of the mRNAs gene deletion or overexpression are amplified through encoding them). the hierarchy of the TRANSCRIPTOME and the PROTEOME, Metabolomics is therefore considered to be, in *School of Chemistry, and are therefore more easily measurable through the many senses, more ‘useful’ (that is, ‘discriminatory’) University of Manchester, metabolome, even when changes in metabolic fluxes than transcriptomics and proteomics, for the following Faraday Building, are negligible1,10–12.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Fellows of the Royal Society
    Female Fellows of the Royal Society Professor Jan Anderson FRS [1996] Professor Ruth Lynden-Bell FRS [2006] Professor Judith Armitage FRS [2013] Dr Mary Lyon FRS [1973] Professor Frances Ashcroft FMedSci FRS [1999] Professor Georgina Mace CBE FRS [2002] Professor Gillian Bates FMedSci FRS [2007] Professor Trudy Mackay FRS [2006] Professor Jean Beggs CBE FRS [1998] Professor Enid MacRobbie FRS [1991] Dame Jocelyn Bell Burnell DBE FRS [2003] Dr Philippa Marrack FMedSci FRS [1997] Dame Valerie Beral DBE FMedSci FRS [2006] Professor Dusa McDuff FRS [1994] Dr Mariann Bienz FMedSci FRS [2003] Professor Angela McLean FRS [2009] Professor Elizabeth Blackburn AC FRS [1992] Professor Anne Mills FMedSci FRS [2013] Professor Andrea Brand FMedSci FRS [2010] Professor Brenda Milner CC FRS [1979] Professor Eleanor Burbidge FRS [1964] Dr Anne O'Garra FMedSci FRS [2008] Professor Eleanor Campbell FRS [2010] Dame Bridget Ogilvie AC DBE FMedSci FRS [2003] Professor Doreen Cantrell FMedSci FRS [2011] Baroness Onora O'Neill * CBE FBA FMedSci FRS [2007] Professor Lorna Casselton CBE FRS [1999] Dame Linda Partridge DBE FMedSci FRS [1996] Professor Deborah Charlesworth FRS [2005] Dr Barbara Pearse FRS [1988] Professor Jennifer Clack FRS [2009] Professor Fiona Powrie FRS [2011] Professor Nicola Clayton FRS [2010] Professor Susan Rees FRS [2002] Professor Suzanne Cory AC FRS [1992] Professor Daniela Rhodes FRS [2007] Dame Kay Davies DBE FMedSci FRS [2003] Professor Elizabeth Robertson FRS [2003] Professor Caroline Dean OBE FRS [2004] Dame Carol Robinson DBE FMedSci
    [Show full text]
  • Are We Losing Our Ability to Think Critically?
    news Society | DOI:10.1145/1538788.1538796 Samuel Greengard Are We Losing Our Ability to Think Critically? Computer technology has enhanced lives in countless ways, but some experts believe it might be affecting people’s ability to think deeply. OCIETY HAS LONG cherished technology alters the way we see, hear, the ability to think beyond and assimilate our world—the act of the ordinary. In a world thinking remains decidedly human. where knowledge is revered and innovation equals Rethinking Thinking Sprogress, those able to bring forth Arriving at a clear definition for criti- greater insight and understanding are cal thinking is a bit tricky. Wikipedia destined to make their mark and blaze describes it as “purposeful and reflec- a trail to greater enlightenment. tive judgment about what to believe or “Critical thinking as an attitude is what to do in response to observations, embedded in Western culture. There experience, verbal or written expres- is a belief that argument is the way to sions, or arguments.” Overlay technolo- finding truth,” observes Adrian West, gy and that’s where things get complex. research director at the Edward de For better or worse, exposure to technology “We can do the same critical-reasoning Bono Foundation U.K., and a former fundamentally changes how people think. operations without technology as we computer science lecturer at the Uni- can with it—just at different speeds and versity of Manchester. “Developing our formation can easily overwhelm our with different ease,” West says. abilities to think more clearly, richly, reasoning abilities.” What’s more, What’s more, while it’s tempting fully—individually and collectively— it’s ironic that ever-growing piles of to view computers, video games, and is absolutely crucial [to solving world data and information do not equate the Internet in a monolithic good or problems].” to greater knowledge and better de- bad way, the reality is that they may To be sure, history is filled with tales cision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Models of Biological Regulation
    Models of Biological Regulation by Moritz Emanuel Beber A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Bioinformatics Approved Dissertation Committee: Prof. Dr. Marc-Thorsten Hütt (chair), Jacobs University Bremen Prof. Dr. Georgi Muskhelishvili, Jacobs University Bremen Prof. Dr.-Ing. Katja Windt, Jacobs University Bremen Prof. Dr. Stefan Bornholdt (external), Universität Bremen Date of Defense: April 17, 2015 Department of Life Sciences & Chemistry iii Statutory Declaration I, Moritz Emanuel Beber, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury, that I am aware of the consequences of a deliberately or negligently wrongly submitted affidavit, in particular the punitive provisions of § 156 and § 161 of the Criminal Code (up to 1 year imprisonment or a fine at delivering a negligent or 3 years or a fine at a knowingly false affidavit). Furthermore I declare that I have written this PhD thesis independently, unless where clearly stated otherwise. I have used only the sources, the data and the support that I have clearly mentioned. This PhD thesis has not been submitted for the conferral of a degree elsewhere. Bremen, July 11, 2017 .................................................................................. Moritz Beber iv Preface The following people deserve my sincerest thanks, more so than I can express in words. There are others whom I do not mention here but also deserve my thanks, please know that you are appreciated nonetheless. First and foremost, I thank my family for showing me, time and again, their unconditional love. Without you I simply would not be here! In particular, I thank my mother Katinka and father Thomas for being calm and analytical when I needed them to but otherwise placing their complete trust in me to go my own way.
    [Show full text]
  • 8Th Conference AM.Pdf
    Measuring the interplay between uptake and loss processes of xenobiotics 13th June 2019 Maddalena Bronzato Physical Chemistry Chemical Technologies & Operations Group Chemical Research, Jealott’s Hill Understanding losses from a foliar surface Volatilisation 2 Why is pesticide volatility so important? ● Environmental fate (loss and persistence) ● Registrability ● Activity (vapour activity and volatility as a benefit) Vapour activity on Aphids Powdery mildew on Fruit Environmental fate 3 Understanding losses from a foliar surface Volatilisation Photodegradation 4 Why is pesticide photodegradation important? ● Activity (photodegradation is one of most destructive post-application pathways) ● Environmental fate (product and persistence) ● Marketability ● Registrability Pesticide sprayed on leaf surface 5 In lab test for volatility and photodegradation Photodegradation Suntest Volatilisation Wind Tunnel 6 Testing for photodegradation - Suntest ● Atlas XLS+ Suntest ● UV-filtered xenon lamp ● Mimics sunlight intensity & spectrum ● Irradiance set to 750W/m2 ● Thermostated baseplate (circulating water @ 15ºC → baseplate ≈ 20 ± 3ºC) 7 Test for volatility- The Wind Tunnel ● Very sample-efficient means of estimating vapour pressure (typically <100µg)] ● Studies are normally run at 40C with a standard wind speed of 1m/s (no control of the R.H.) 8 Photodegradation and volatility test – glass as substrate Pros: ● Good proxy for foliar surface ● Uniform, clean substrate to use for the tests ● High-throughput test ● Worst case scenario ● Indicative but imperfect Limitations: ● Different polarity and morphology between glass and leaves–> differences in redistribution mechanism and deposit shape? 9 SEM images of leaf and glass surfaces Glass 10 Surface redistribution mechanisms Volatilisation Photodegradation Vapour Phase Redistribution 11 Different deposit – effect on photodegradation and volatility Crystalline Amorphous A highly crystalline deposit The larger the deposit area, the faster the compound volatilises.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 32 (2008) 825{877 Submitted 06/07; published 08/08 Qualitative System Identification from Imperfect Data George M. Coghill g.coghill@abdn.ac.uk School of Natural and Computing Sciences University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3UE. UK. Ashwin Srinivasan ashwin.srinivasan@in.ibm.com IBM India Research Laboratory 4, Block C, Institutional Area Vasant Kunj Phase II, New Delhi 110070, India. and Department of CSE and Centre for Health Informatics University of New South Wales, Kensington Sydney, Australia. Ross D. King rdk@aber.ac.uk Deptartment of Computer Science University of Wales, Aberystwyth, SY23 3DB. UK. Abstract Experience in the physical sciences suggests that the only realistic means of under- standing complex systems is through the use of mathematical models. Typically, this has come to mean the identification of quantitative models expressed as differential equations. Quantitative modelling works best when the structure of the model (i.e., the form of the equations) is known; and the primary concern is one of estimating the values of the param- eters in the model. For complex biological systems, the model-structure is rarely known and the modeler has to deal with both model-identification and parameter-estimation. In this paper we are concerned with providing automated assistance to the first of these prob- lems. Specifically, we examine the identification by machine of the structural relationships between experimentally observed variables. These relationship will be expressed in the form of qualitative abstractions of a quantitative model. Such qualitative models may not only provide clues to the precise quantitative model, but also assist in understand- ing the essence of that model.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebecca Darley, Daniel Reynolds and Chris Wickham Open Access Journals in Humanities and Social Science a British Academy Research Project
    OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS IN HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCE Rebecca Darley, Daniel Reynolds and Chris Wickham Open access journals in Humanities and Social Science A British Academy Research Project Rebecca Darley, Daniel Reynolds and Chris Wickham The British Academy 2014 THE BRITISH ACADEMY 10–11 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AH Website: www.britac.ac.uk Registered Charity, No. 233176 © 2014 the contributors This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. ISBN 978-0-85672-614-9 Contents Open access journals in Humanities and Social Science: summary 4 1. Introduction and context 10 2. UK Humanities and Social Science journal publishing and its international face 24 3. The open access policies of journals outside the UK 36 4. Journal half-lives and their implications 49 5. The viability of journals in an open-access context 67 6. Who should pay for publishing? 78 7. Conclusions 88 Appendix A 95 Appendix B 100 Appendix C 103 4 Open access journals in Humanities and Social Science Open access journals in Humanities and Social Science: summary Open access journals in Humanities and Social Science, published 2014 by the British Academy Open access journals in Humanities and Social Science: summary 5 Introduction • This British Academy research project on the effects of current UK open access policies was funded by the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) and was overseen by a Steering Committee set up by the Academy to manage the project. The project was led by Professor Chris Wickham, FBA (British Academy Vice-President, Publications), with support and co-writing from Dr Rebecca Darley and Dr Daniel Reynolds.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey on Scientific Data Management
    A Survey on Scientific Data Management References [1] Ilkay Altintas, Chad Berkley, Efrat Jaeger, Matthew Jones, Bertram Ludascher,¨ and Steve Mock. Kepler: An extensible system for design and execution of scientific workflows. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM’04), pages 21– 23, 2004. [2] Alexander Ames, Nikhil Bobb, Scott A. Brandt, Adam Hiatt, Carlos Maltzahn, Ethan L. Miller, Alisa Neeman, and Deepa Tuteja. Richer file system metadata using links and attributes. In Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE / 13th NASA Goddard Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST’05), pages 49–60, 2005. [3] Bill Anderson. Mass storage system performance prediction using a trace-driven simulator. In MSST ’05: Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE / 13th NASA Goddard Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies, pages 297–306, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society. [4] Phil Andrews, Bryan Banister, Patricia Kovatch, Chris Jordan, and Roger Haskin. Scaling a global file system to the greatest possible extent, performance, capacity, and number of users. In MSST ’05: Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE / 13th NASA Goddard Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Tech- nologies, pages 109–117, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society. [5] Grigoris Antoniou and Frank van Harmelen. A Semantic Web Primer. The MIT Press, 2004. [6] Scott Brandt, Carlos Maltzahn, Neoklis Polyzotis, and Wang-Chiew Tan. Fusing data management services with file systems. In PDSW ’09: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Workshop on Petascale Data Storage, pages 42–46, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. [7] Peter Buneman, Adriane Chapman, and James Cheney.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review 2014.Qxp Layout 1 15/01/2015 12:10 Page 1
    M1251 Annual Review 2014.qxp_Layout 1 15/01/2015 12:10 Page 1 AnnuAl Review 2013/14 M1251 Annual Review 2014.qxp_Layout 1 15/01/2015 12:10 Page 2 Review of the yeAR is was a year in which we took significant steps towards achieving some of our strategic goals. At the same time, we were able to identify those areas where we need to do more work to meet our very ambitious targets. Contents News 2 Feature 6 Research 8 Culture and community 10 People 12 Facts and figures 16 Professor Dame Nancy Rothwell NEWS FEATURE RESEARCH Alan Gilbert Learning Commons Global challenges, Graphene paints a 2 scoops Guardian University Award 6 Manchester solutions 8 corrosion-free future M1251 Annual Review 2014.qxp_Layout 1 15/01/2015 12:10 Page 1 Annual Review 2013/14 01 It was very pleasing that we generated an therefore, that the number of students in positive initiative to help local unemployed people to operating surplus for the year of £45 million. graduate destinations has increased. prepare for and return to work, either with the Generating an operating surplus is crucial for the University or with local employers, has been huge. University in order to invest in our priority activities. There remains work to do to reach our targeted We made 773 appointments, putting us ahead of position in the upper quartile of NSS results of the our two-year target with a year still to go and In terms of the research agenda, 2013/14 was Russell Group. I was delighted that one of our bringing the number of new appointments since dominated by preparing our submission for the largest investments in the student experience, the programme’s launch to 1,931.
    [Show full text]
  • Scholarly Open Access
    10/4/13 LIST OF PUBLISHERS | Scholarly Open Access Scholarly Open Access Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing LIST OF PUBLISHERS Beall’s List: Potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open- access publishers This is a list of questionable, scholarly open-access publishers. We recommend that scholars read the available reviews, assessments and descriptions provided here, and then decide for themselves whether they want to submit articles, serve as editors or on editorial boards. The criteria for determining predatory publishers are here (http://wp.me/p280Ch-g5). We hope that tenure and promotion committees can also decide for themselves how importantly or not to rate articles published in these journals in the context of their own institutional standards and/or geocultural locus. We emphasize that journal publishers and journals change in their business and editorial practices over time. This list is kept up-to-date to the best extent possible but may not reflect sudden, unreported, or unknown enhancements. o Abhinav (http://www.abhinavjournal.com/index.aspx) o A M Publishers (http://ampublisher.com/index.html) o Academe Research Journals (http://www.academeresearchjournals.org) o Academia Publishing (http://academiapublishing.org/index.htm) o Academic and Business Research Institute (http://www.aabri.com/) o Academic and Scientific Publishing (http://acascipub.com/) o Academic Journals (http://www.academicjournals.org/) o Academic Journals and Research ACJAR (http://www.acjar.org/index.html) o Academic Journals,
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Multi-Discipline Network Perspective
    Manifesto from Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 12182 Towards A Multi-Discipline Network Perspective Edited by Matthias Häsel1, Thorsten Quandt2, and Gottfried Vossen3 1 Otto Group – Hamburg, DE, Matthias.Haesel@otto.de 2 Universität Hohenheim, DE, thorsten.quandt@uni-hohenheim.de 3 Universität Münster, DE, vossen@uni-muenster.de Abstract This is the manifesto of Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 12182 on a multi-discipline perspective on networks. The information society is shaped by an increasing presence of networks in various manifestations, most notably computer networks, supply-chain networks, and social networks, but also business networks, administrative networks, or political networks. Online networks nowadays connect people all around the world at day and night, and allow to communicate and to work collaboratively and efficiently. What has been a commodity in the private as well as in the enterprise sectors independently for quite some time now is currently growing together at an increasing pace. As a consequence, the time has come for the relevant sciences, including computer science, information systems, social sciences, economics, communication sciences, and others, to give up their traditional “silo-style” thinking and enter into borderless dialogue and interaction. The purpose of this Manifesto is to review where we stand today, and to outline directions in which we urgently need to move, in terms of both research and teaching, but also in terms of funding. Perspectives Workshop 02.–04. May, 2012 – www.dagstuhl.de/12182 1998 ACM Subject Classification A.0 General, A.2 Reference, H. Information Systems, J.4 So- cial and Behavioral Sciences, K.4 Computers and Society Keywords and phrases Networks, network infrastructure, network types, network effects, data in networks, social networks, social media, crowdsourcing Digital Object Identifier 10.4230/DagMan.2.1.1 Executive Summary The information society is shaped by an increasing presence of networks in various mani- festations.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton
    University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk Bibliography E. J. Aarseth. Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1997. Annette Adler, Anuj Gujar, Beverly L. Harrison, Kenton O’Hara, and Abigail Sellen. A diary study of work-related reading: Design implications for digital reading de- vices. In Proceedings of CHI ’98 Human Factors in Computing Systems, Los Angeles, California, USA, pages 241–248, 1998. M.J. Adler and C. van Doren. How to Read a Book. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY, 1972. Janet Adshead-Lansdale, editor. Dancing texts: intertextuality in interpretation. Dance Books, London, 1999. Maristella Agosti and James Allan. Methods and tools for the construction of hypertext. Information Processing and Management, 33(2):129–271, 1997. R. Akscyn, D. McCracken, and E. Yoder. KMS: A distributed hypermedia system for managing knowledge in organizations.
    [Show full text]