Shear Rate-Dependent Rheological Properties of Mine Tailings: Determination of Dynamic and Static Yield Stresses

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shear Rate-Dependent Rheological Properties of Mine Tailings: Determination of Dynamic and Static Yield Stresses applied sciences Article Shear Rate-Dependent Rheological Properties of Mine Tailings: Determination of Dynamic and Static Yield Stresses Sueng-Won Jeong Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Daejeon 34132, Korea; [email protected] Received: 9 August 2019; Accepted: 5 November 2019; Published: 7 November 2019 Abstract: In this paper, shear rate-dependent rheological properties of mine tailings taken from abandoned mine deposits prone to mass movements are examined using a commercial ball-measuring rheological system. The yield stresses (i.e., dynamic and static yield stresses) and viscosity of sand-rich materials are examined by the shear rate-controlled flow curve and time-dependent stress growth methods. Before yielding, the shear stress reaches a peak value (i.e., yield stress) observed for all flow curves. In the steady-state condition, the materials have a minimum shear stress (i.e., dynamic yield stress). The static yield stress can be determined under a constant applied shear rate with different 4 1 1 initial values ranging from 10− to 10− s− . As a result, the Bingham yield stress and viscosity can be used as a first approximation for estimating the debris flow mobility of post-failure materials. However, the Bingham yield stress is competitive with the static yield stress measured from stress growth methods. Upon comparison of the dynamic and static yield stresses, the static yield stress is approximately 35–45 times greater than the dynamic yield stress, and may be strongly related to microstructural changes (i.e., thixotropy). In this context, special attention must be paid to the determination of yield stresses in debris flow mitigation programs. Keywords: dynamic yield stress; static yield stress; initial shear rate; mine tailings; debris flow 1. Introduction The yield stress is a special property associated with non-Newtonian fluids, such as clay suspensions, concrete cements, crude oil, foams, food, paints, pastes, and polymers [1–6]. In general, the yield stress is defined as the shear stress at the point where the applied stress exceeds the critical shear rate; in this case, the material starts to flow. Materials may deform elastically due to structural changes below the yield stress, but they may deform greatly and flow like liquids above the yield stress. There are numerous methods that can be employed to determine the yield stress of non-Newtonian fluids: model fitting, a slump test, an inclined plane test, a stress ramp test, a stress growth test, oscillation amplitude sweep, and creep tests. However, the yield stress is strongly dependent on the test conditions and techniques employed [7,8]. In addition, many non-Newtonian fluids are thixotropic [9,10]. Structural changes with time are unavoidable during shear. Time-dependent rheological characteristics make it difficult to find a robust method for determining the true yield stress [11]. This subject is still under debate in cement and concrete research (such as building materials) and disaster-prevention measures (such as debris flow analysis for estimating future catastrophic hazards). The dynamic and static yield stresses can be determined by equilibrium flow curves and stress growth methods. The dynamic yield stress is the minimum shear stress in the flow curve with a steady-state flow condition, while the static yield stress is the peak shear stress measured with a constant shearing time [12]. It is also well-known that the dynamic yield stress is associated with Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4744; doi:10.3390/app9224744 www.mdpi.com/journal/applsci Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4744 2 of 11 flow stopping, but the static yield stress is associated with flow starting [13]. According to previous studies [6], the dynamic and static yield stresses are related to the state before and after microstructural changes in materials. In addition, the conception of the time depending on the value of the yield stress has been pointed out by numerous studies [14–16]. As a result, it is expected that the value of dynamic yield stress is much lower than that of static yield stress with respect to the structural states. It is well-known that the yield stress is related to the structural change, that is, thixotropy. Rheological properties are essential in the fluid industry and natural disaster-related sciences. The rheological properties are examined for various materials, such as clay suspensions, muds, sand-rich materials, and reconstituted pyroclastic debris flows [13,17–20]. Water is typically a viscous liquid, while particle-bearing liquids typically behave as non-Newtonian fluids, indicating more complex rheological characteristics. Few studies have focused on the geotechnical and rheological properties of post-failure materials in mass movements, which can result in rapid complex fluid-like behavior as a kind of soil liquefaction. In the field of debris flows, a multiphase process in large particle-bearing debris flows is of paramount importance [21] because they are very dense and exhibit strong interactions between particles in the interstitial fluid. Rheological tests are often considered large particle-laden flows, e.g., the mean grain size of materials tested in rheometers has often been a typical sand with particle sizes from 0.075 to 2 mm in diameter. However, the change in rheological properties is significant when the solid fraction is slightly changed [13]. The disposal of mine tailings and waste rock materials involving sand- and gravel-size particles in open pits is a problem that needs to be managed. Severe erosion and mass movements in abandoned mine deposits can result in physicochemical contamination at and near the mine deposits [22]. In this case, the determination of flow properties is crucial for debris flow rheology [19] because the runout distances and speeds of debris flows are mainly estimated by yield stress and viscosity [23]. When estimating the runout distance of debris flows in coarse-grained sediments, the rheological characteristics are the decisive criteria for mitigating and managing future debris flow events in mountainous areas. However, the determination of dynamic and static yield stresses in debris flows is still poorly studied. In this study, the dynamic and static yield stresses of sand-rich materials taken from abandoned mine deposits are studied. First, the flow behaviors of the sand-rich materials are examined as a function of the shear rate (i.e., the flow curve) at the same solid volume concentration. Second, the rheological properties, i.e., yield stresses and viscosity, are determined using model fitting, including Bingham, Herschel–Bulkley, bilinear, modified Bingham, and power law models. The initial shear rate-dependent shear stress is examined. Third, under a constant applied shear rate, the stress build-up with time is monitored. The differences in dynamic and static yield stresses as a function of shear rate are highlighted. Finally, the shear strengths, including the undrained shear strength measured from fall cone tests, the Bingham yield stress, and the static yield stress in modeling the debris flow, are compared. Creep and recovery tests are not taken into account. It should also be noted that pre-shearing has an impact on the determination of yield stress with respect to the flocculation state in the materials. Therefore, only a limited situation can be discussed. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Materials The materials tested were mine tailings taken from an abandoned mine deposit site located in Busan Metropolitan City, Republic of Korea. The grain sizes were fine to coarse, and the shapes were subangular. The main mineralogical composition was quartz, pyrophyllite, pyrite, sericite, and kaolin clay [22,24]. The on-site materials are very coarse: 30% gravel, 60–70% sand, and 5% finer sizes (clay and silt particles). The natural water content is less than 10%, and the permeability (k) is very high (e.g., k 2 10 cm/s 1). In the waste rock dump with a low level of vegetation, abandoned mine deposits ≥ × − experience severe erosion. In addition, after torrential rainfall events in the summer monsoon season, several traces of mass movements (e.g., rotational slumps, slides, and debris flows) can be found on Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4744 3 of 11 natural slopes. Failed materials often flow and are deposited in a mountain stream at and near the waste rock dump. In brief, the materials can be gravelly sands; however, they are very difficult to test in conventional rheological tests because most rheometers are suitable for fine-grained sediments. To measure these materials, a series of rheometric tests was performed on the material passing through a No. 4 sieve (i.e., sand-rich materials) using a ball-penetrating torque-measured system called the “ball-measuring system (BMS)” in this study. 2.2. Methods Numerous testing methods and apparatuses have been designed for determining the soil resistance of debris flow materials in the range from microscale to macroscale measuring systems (e.g., plate-plate, cone-plate, cylinder, vane, stirrer, slump, and large-scale devices). Figure1 shows the rheometer used in this study. The commercial ball-measuring rheological system (BMS, RheolabQC, Anton Paar) consists of three balls and a container. The balls have three diameters, i.e., 10, 12, and 15 mm, whilst the container (cup) has a diameter of 115 mm with a sample volume of 500 cm3. In this system, a homogenous soil sample, the mixture of soil and water, is placed into the container and the ball is immersed into the soil sample. The depth of ball penetration is the same for all tests. The distance between the ball and the bottom of the container is 20 mm. Torques are automatically recorded when rotating the ball. The shear rate control or shear stress control mode can be applied. The measurement of shear stress and the shear rate in a ball-measuring system can be performed for 1–5 mm diameter soil samples.
Recommended publications
  • 10-1 CHAPTER 10 DEFORMATION 10.1 Stress-Strain Diagrams And
    EN380 Naval Materials Science and Engineering Course Notes, U.S. Naval Academy CHAPTER 10 DEFORMATION 10.1 Stress-Strain Diagrams and Material Behavior 10.2 Material Characteristics 10.3 Elastic-Plastic Response of Metals 10.4 True stress and strain measures 10.5 Yielding of a Ductile Metal under a General Stress State - Mises Yield Condition. 10.6 Maximum shear stress condition 10.7 Creep Consider the bar in figure 1 subjected to a simple tension loading F. Figure 1: Bar in Tension Engineering Stress () is the quotient of load (F) and area (A). The units of stress are normally pounds per square inch (psi). = F A where: is the stress (psi) F is the force that is loading the object (lb) A is the cross sectional area of the object (in2) When stress is applied to a material, the material will deform. Elongation is defined as the difference between loaded and unloaded length ∆푙 = L - Lo where: ∆푙 is the elongation (ft) L is the loaded length of the cable (ft) Lo is the unloaded (original) length of the cable (ft) 10-1 EN380 Naval Materials Science and Engineering Course Notes, U.S. Naval Academy Strain is the concept used to compare the elongation of a material to its original, undeformed length. Strain () is the quotient of elongation (e) and original length (L0). Engineering Strain has no units but is often given the units of in/in or ft/ft. ∆푙 휀 = 퐿 where: is the strain in the cable (ft/ft) ∆푙 is the elongation (ft) Lo is the unloaded (original) length of the cable (ft) Example Find the strain in a 75 foot cable experiencing an elongation of one inch.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary: Definitions
    Appendix B Glossary: Definitions The definitions given here apply to the terminology used throughout this book. Some of the terms may be defined differently by other authors; when this is the case, alternative terminology is noted. When two or more terms with identical or similar meaning are in general acceptance, they are given in the order of preference of the current writers. Allowable stress (working stress): If a member is so designed that the maximum stress as calculated for the expected conditions of service is less than some limiting value, the member will have a proper margin of security against damage or failure. This limiting value is the allowable stress subject to the material and condition of service in question. The allowable stress is made less than the damaging stress because of uncertainty as to the conditions of service, nonuniformity of material, and inaccuracy of the stress analysis (see Ref. 1). The margin between the allowable stress and the damaging stress may be reduced in proportion to the certainty with which the conditions of the service are known, the intrinsic reliability of the material, the accuracy with which the stress produced by the loading can be calculated, and the degree to which failure is unattended by danger or loss. (Compare with Damaging stress; Factor of safety; Factor of utilization; Margin of safety. See Refs. l–3.) Apparent elastic limit (useful limit point): The stress at which the rate of change of strain with respect to stress is 50% greater than at zero stress. It is more definitely determinable from the stress–strain diagram than is the proportional limit, and is useful for comparing materials of the same general class.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory Guide 3.39 Standard Format & Content of License
    NUREG-O010 USNRC REGULATORY J GUIDE SERIES REGULATORY GUIDE 3.39 STANDARD FORMAT AND CONTENT OF LICENSE APPLICATIONS FOR PLUTONIUM PROCESSING 2 AND FUEL FABRICATION PLANTS JANUARY 1976 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Available from National Technical Information Service Springfield, Virginia 22161 Price: Printed Copy $5.50 ; Microfiche $2.25 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION January 1976 REGULATORY GUIDE OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT REGULATORY GUIDE 3.39 1 STANDARD FORMAT AND C KEN\ OF LICENSE APPLIC 0O1 .R PLUTONIUM PROCf$ L4('I AND FUEL FABRjATI XP lTS USNRC REGULATORY GUIDES Comments should be sent to the Secretary of the Commission. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Guides are Issued to describe and make available to the public Regulatory Commission. Washington. D.C. 20555. Attention Docketing and methods ecceptable to the NRC staff of implementing specific parts of the Service Section Commission's regulations, to delineate techniques used by the staff in evelu eting specific problems or postulated accidents. or to provide guidance to appli The guides are issued In the following ten broed divisions cants Regulatory Guides are not substitutes for regulations. and compliance 1 wer Reactors 6. Products with them Is not required. Methods end solutions different from those set 2. out in Research and Test Reactors 7. Transponation the guides will be acceptable if they provide a basis for the findings requisite to 3. Fuels and Materiels Facilities I Occupational Health the issuance or continuance of apermit or license by the Commission 4. Evironmental andSiting 9.Antitrust Review Comments and suggestions for Improvements in these guides are encouraged 5. Materials and Plant Protection 10.
    [Show full text]
  • World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps
    ISSN 0532-0488 WORLD SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS 106 World reference base for soil resources 2014 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 Cover photographs (left to right): Ekranic Technosol – Austria (©Erika Michéli) Reductaquic Cryosol – Russia (©Maria Gerasimova) Ferralic Nitisol – Australia (©Ben Harms) Pellic Vertisol – Bulgaria (©Erika Michéli) Albic Podzol – Czech Republic (©Erika Michéli) Hypercalcic Kastanozem – Mexico (©Carlos Cruz Gaistardo) Stagnic Luvisol – South Africa (©Márta Fuchs) Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: SALES AND MARKETING GROUP Information Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (+39) 06 57053360 Web site: http://www.fao.org WORLD SOIL World reference base RESOURCES REPORTS for soil resources 2014 106 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2015 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SOIL MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING This paper was downloaded from the Online Library of the International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE). The library is available here: https://www.issmge.org/publications/online-library This is an open-access database that archives thousands of papers published under the Auspices of the ISSMGE and maintained by the Innovation and Development Committee of ISSMGE. 1/18 Liquefaction of Saturated Sandy Soils Liquéfaction de sols sableux saturés by V. A. F lorin , Professor, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Member of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Institute of Mechanics of the USSR Academy of Sciences, and P. L. I vanov , Docent, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Leningrad Polytechnic Institute. Summary Sommaire The authors give results obtained from theoretical and Le présent rapport contient quelques résultats des études experimental research on the liquefaction of saturated sandy théoriques et expérimentales des phénomènes de liquéfaction soils undertaken by them, in the Laboratory of Soil Mechanics de sols sableux saturés qui ont été effectuées aux Laboratoires of the Institute of Mechanics of the U.S.S.R. Academy of Sciences de Mécanique des sols de l’institut de Mécanique de l’Académie and in the Leningrad Polytechnic Institute. des Sciences de l’U.R.S.S. et de l’institut Polytechnique de Laboratory investigations have been carried out on various Leningrad. kinds of disturbances affecting saturated sandy soils and causing Les auteurs décrivent des études de Laboratoire de la liqué­ their liquefaction. The authors also give the results of studies faction de sols sableux soumis à diverses influences.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Rheological Nomenclature: Measurements in Ceramic Particulate Systems
    NfST Nisr National institute of Standards and Technology Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce NIST Special Publication 946 Guide to Rheological Nomenclature: Measurements in Ceramic Particulate Systems Vincent A. Hackley and Chiara F. Ferraris rhe National Institute of Standards and Technology was established in 1988 by Congress to "assist industry in the development of technology . needed to improve product quality, to modernize manufacturing processes, to ensure product reliability . and to facilitate rapid commercialization ... of products based on new scientific discoveries." NIST, originally founded as the National Bureau of Standards in 1901, works to strengthen U.S. industry's competitiveness; advance science and engineering; and improve public health, safety, and the environment. One of the agency's basic functions is to develop, maintain, and retain custody of the national standards of measurement, and provide the means and methods for comparing standards used in science, engineering, manufacturing, commerce, industry, and education with the standards adopted or recognized by the Federal Government. As an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department's Technology Administration, NIST conducts basic and applied research in the physical sciences and engineering, and develops measurement techniques, test methods, standards, and related services. The Institute does generic and precompetitive work on new and advanced technologies. NIST's research facilities are located at Gaithersburg, MD 20899, and at Boulder, CO 80303.
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Approach for Tunnel Support Design Through Q and Rmi Systems in Fractured Rock Mass
    applied sciences Article An Empirical Approach for Tunnel Support Design through Q and RMi Systems in Fractured Rock Mass Jaekook Lee 1, Hafeezur Rehman 1,2, Abdul Muntaqim Naji 1,3, Jung-Joo Kim 4 and Han-Kyu Yoo 1,* 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, 55 Hanyangdaehak-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan 426-791, Korea; [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (H.R.); [email protected] (A.M.N.) 2 Department of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Baluchistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences (BUITEMS), Quetta 87300, Pakistan 3 Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Baluchistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences (BUITEMS), Quetta 87300, Pakistan 4 Korea Railroad Research Institute, 176 Cheoldobangmulgwan-ro, Uiwang-si, Gyeonggi-do 16105, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-31-400-5147; Fax: +82-31-409-4104 Received: 26 November 2018; Accepted: 14 December 2018; Published: 18 December 2018 Abstract: Empirical systems for the classification of rock mass are used primarily for preliminary support design in tunneling. When applying the existing acceptable international systems for tunnel preliminary supports in high-stress environments, the tunneling quality index (Q) and the rock mass index (RMi) systems that are preferred over geomechanical classification due to the stress characterization parameters that are incorporated into the two systems. However, these two systems are not appropriate when applied in a location where the rock is jointed and experiencing high stresses. This paper empirically extends the application of the two systems to tunnel support design in excavations in such locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Navier-Stokes-Equation
    Math 613 * Fall 2018 * Victor Matveev Derivation of the Navier-Stokes Equation 1. Relationship between force (stress), stress tensor, and strain: Consider any sub-volume inside the fluid, with variable unit normal n to the surface of this sub-volume. Definition: Force per area at each point along the surface of this sub-volume is called the stress vector T. When fluid is not in motion, T is pointing parallel to the outward normal n, and its magnitude equals pressure p: T = p n. However, if there is shear flow, the two are not parallel to each other, so we need a marix (a tensor), called the stress-tensor , to express the force direction relative to the normal direction, defined as follows: T Tn or Tnkjjk As we will see below, σ is a symmetric matrix, so we can also write Tn or Tnkkjj The difference in directions of T and n is due to the non-diagonal “deviatoric” part of the stress tensor, jk, which makes the force deviate from the normal: jkp jk jk where p is the usual (scalar) pressure From general considerations, it is clear that the only source of such “skew” / ”deviatoric” force in fluid is the shear component of the flow, described by the shear (non-diagonal) part of the “strain rate” tensor e kj: 2 1 jk2ee jk mm jk where euujk j k k j (strain rate tensro) 3 2 Note: the funny construct 2/3 guarantees that the part of proportional to has a zero trace. The two terms above represent the most general (and the only possible) mathematical expression that depends on first-order velocity derivatives and is invariant under coordinate transformations like rotations.
    [Show full text]
  • FHWA/TX-07/0-5202-1 Accession No
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-07/0-5202-1 Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Determination of Field Suction Values, Hydraulic Properties, August 2005; Revised March 2007 and Shear Strength in High PI Clays 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jorge G. Zornberg, Jeffrey Kuhn, and Stephen Wright 0-5202-1 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin 0-5202 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report Research and Technology Implementation Office September 2004–August 2006 P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Project Title: Determination of Field Suction Values in High PI Clays for Various Surface Conditions and Drain Installations 16. Abstract Moisture infiltration into highway embankments constructed by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) using high Plasticity Index (PI) clays results in changes in shear strength and in flow pattern that leads to recurrent slope failures. In addition, soil cracking over time increases the rate of moisture infiltration. The overall objective of this research is to determine the suction, hydraulic properties, and shear strength of high PI Texas clays. Specifically, two comprehensive experimental programs involving the characterization of unsaturated properties and the shear strength of a high PI clay (Eagle Ford clay) were conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Soil Dilatancy
    The Influence of Grain Shape on Dilatancy Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Cox, Melissa Reiko Brooke Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 24/09/2021 03:25:54 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/195563 THE INFLUENCE OF GRAIN SHAPE ON DILATANCY by MELISSA REIKO BROOKE COX ________________________ A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MECHANICS In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WITH A MAJOR IN CIVIL ENGINEERING In the Graduate College THE UNIVERISTY OF ARIZONA 2 0 0 8 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Melissa Reiko Brooke Cox entitled The Influence of Grain Shape on Dilatancy and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: October 17, 2008 Muniram Budhu ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: October 17, 2008 Achintya Haldar ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: October 17, 2008 Chandrakant S. Desai ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: October 17, 2008 John M. Kemeny Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • Slope Stability 101 Basic Concepts and NOT for Final Design Purposes! Slope Stability Analysis Basics
    Slope Stability 101 Basic Concepts and NOT for Final Design Purposes! Slope Stability Analysis Basics Shear Strength of Soils Ability of soil to resist sliding on itself on the slope Angle of Repose definition n1. the maximum angle to the horizontal at which rocks, soil, etc, will remain without sliding Shear Strength Parameters and Soils Info Φ angle of internal friction C cohesion (clays are cohesive and sands are non-cohesive) Θ slope angle γ unit weight of soil Internal Angles of Friction Estimates for our use in example Silty sand Φ = 25 degrees Loose sand Φ = 30 degrees Medium to Dense sand Φ = 35 degrees Rock Riprap Φ = 40 degrees Slope Stability Analysis Basics Explore Site Geology Characterize soil shear strength Construct slope stability model Establish seepage and groundwater conditions Select loading condition Locate critical failure surface Iterate until minimum Factor of Safety (FS) is achieved Rules of Thumb and “Easy” Method of Estimating Slope Stability Geology and Soils Information Needed (from site or soils database) Check appropriate loading conditions (seeps, rapid drawdown, fluctuating water levels, flows) Select values to input for Φ and C Locate water table in slope (critical for evaluation!) 2:1 slopes are typically stable for less than 15 foot heights Note whether or not existing slopes are vegetated and stable Plan for a factor of safety (hazards evaluation) FS between 1.4 and 1.5 is typically adequate for our purposes No Flow Slope Stability Analysis FS = tan Φ / tan Θ Where Φ is the effective
    [Show full text]
  • Using Lenterra Shear Stress Sensors to Measure Viscosity
    Application Note: Using Lenterra Shear Stress Sensors to Measure Viscosity Guidelines for using Lenterra’s shear stress sensors for in-line, real-time measurement of viscosity in pipes, thin channels, and high-shear mixers. Shear Stress and Viscosity Shear stress is a force that acts on an object that is directed parallel to its surface. Lenterra’s RealShear™ sensors directly measure the wall shear stress caused by flowing or mixing fluids. As an example, when fluids pass between a rotor and a stator in a high-shear mixer, shear stress is experienced by the fluid and the surfaces that it is in contact with. A RealShear™ sensor can be mounted on the stator to measure this shear stress, as a means to monitor mixing processes or facilitate scale-up. Shear stress and viscosity are interrelated through the shear rate (velocity gradient) of a fluid: ∂u τ = µ = γµ & . ∂y Here τ is the shear stress, γ˙ is the shear rate, µ is the dynamic viscosity, u is the velocity component of the fluid tangential to the wall, and y is the distance from the wall. When the viscosity of a fluid is not a function of shear rate or shear stress, that fluid is described as “Newtonian.” In non-Newtonian fluids the viscosity of a fluid depends on the shear rate or stress (or in some cases the duration of stress). Certain non-Newtonian fluids behave as Newtonian fluids at high shear rates and can be described by the equation above. For others, the viscosity can be expressed with certain models.
    [Show full text]