Thomistic Personalism: Knowledge & Love

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Thomistic Personalism: Knowledge & Love Course Number:A PHS781 Course Title: A Thomistic Personalism: Knowledge & Love Instructor: A A Fr. Pawel Tarasiewicz, Ph.D. A 1. COURSE DESCRIPTION There are five characteristics that hold for personalism as such (see the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy): (1) an insistence on the radical difference between persons and non-persons; (2) an insistence on the irreducibility of the person to impersonal spiritual or material factors; (3) an affirmation of the dignity of persons; (4) a concern for the person’s subjectivity and self-determination; (5) a particular emphasis on the social (relational) nature of the person. The course seeks to demonstrate that personalism can be effectively grounded in the philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas. It presents Thomistic personalism as that which successfully addresses all the essential issues concerning the human person. Particular lectures undertake such topics as: When does the person begin?, Is the person a soul?, What is the difference between persons and animals? How is the person’s happiness achieved? Why are cognition, freedom and love the areas of the person’s transcendence over nature?, What are the errors of individualism and collectivism?, etc. 2. ENVISIONED LEARNING OUTCOMES The student will be able to demonstrate a familiarity with and understanding of the core teachings of Thomistic personalism, including its foundational philosophical ideas (e.g. the person’s identity, potentiality and transcendence). The student will be able to explain and discuss a variety of topics related to Thomistic personalism, including the following: a) What is the outcome if love is espoused by wisdom? b) Why is Thomistic personalism in need of phenomenology, according to Karol Wojtyła/St. John Paul II? c) What is the major contribution of Fr. W. Norris Clarke, S.J., to the development of Thomistic personalism? d) What is an argument which supports the claim that conception and ensoulment converge? e) Is the person an incarnate spirit? f) What is that which defines the range of our humanity (against the background of animal nature and “posthuman nature”)? g) Are we potential persons or persons with potential? h) Is it possible for persons’ decisions to be morally good, while contrary to natural law at the same time? i) What is wisdom and how does it differ, if at all, from knowledge and understanding? j) Why does lying undermine (deprive us of) our freedom? k) Why is it that our love for other persons is conditioned by our self-love? l) Why can the development of human persons’ potentials be regarded as a common good proper to human societies? m) Is God necessary to explain human dignity? n) What is that which makes society a communio personarum? o) What is the advantage of Thomistic personalism, if any at all, over non-Thomistic brands of personalism? 3. COURSE SCHEDULE 1 Week 1: Why Thomistic Personalism? (a) Recorded lecture discussing the following: ▪ What is personalism? ▪ What is Thomistic personalism? (Maritain’s Thomistic personalism; Wojtyła’s Thomistic personalism) ▪ What is Thomistic personalism? (Clarke’s Thomistic Personalism: Metaphysics) ▪ What is Thomistic personalism? (Clarke’s Thomistic Personalism: Metaethics; Strong Thomistic Personalism: From Metaphysics and Metaethics to Personalism) ▪ Thomistic personalism: Why knowledge and love? (b) Readings: indicated by the instructor (in handouts). (c) Assignments/Activities/Discussions: Please answer the question: ▪ What is the outcome if wisdom is espoused by love? Week 2: Thomistic Personalism: Supplementing Thomism (St. John Paul II/Karol Wojtyła) (a) Recorded lecture discussing the following: ▪ What is Thomistic personalism, according to Karol Wojtyła? ▪ Why Thomistic personalism is not enough for Karol Wojtyła? ▪ Wojtyła’s unique approach to the study of the human person (b) Readings: indicated by the instructor (in handouts). (c) Assignments/Activities/Discussions: Please answer the question: ▪ Why does Thomistic personalism need phenomenology, according to Karol Wojtyła/St. John Paul II? Week 3: Thomistic Personalism: Developing Thomism (Fr. W. Norris Clarke, S.J.) (a) Recorded lecture discussing the following: ▪ Fr. Clarke’s relational metaphysics ▪ Being as dynamic act ▪ The meaning of person ▪ The structure of human nature ▪ Person and Being: Conclusion ▪ The human person as frontier being and microcosm (b) Readings: indicated by the instructor (in handouts). (c) Assignments/Activities/Discussions: Please answer the question: ▪ What is the major contribution of Fr. Clarke to the development of Thomistic personalism? Please explain your opinion. Week 4: The Identity of the Person: When Does the Person Begin? (a) Recorded lecture discussing the following: ▪ What is a person? ▪ Evidences showing that the early embryo is not a person ▪ Counter-arguments showing the zygote as a person ▪ The metaphysical arguments about personhood ▪ Conclusion about the personhood of the early embryo (b) Readings: indicated by the instructor (in handouts). (c) Assignments/Activities/Discussions: Please answer the question: ▪ What is an argument which supports the claim that conception and ensoulment converge? Week 5: The Identity of the Person: Is the Human Person a Soul? (a) Recorded lecture discussing the following: ▪ How is it that a human person exists as a unified substance? ▪ How is it that a human person exists naturally as an embodied being, while a human soul can exist without being united to a body? ▪ What accounts for the individuation of human persons as distinct members of the human species? 2 ▪ What is the principle of identity by which a human person persists through time and change? (b) Readings: indicated by the instructor (in handouts). (c) Assignment (by an e-mail to the professor): Please present a draft plan for your term paper, containing the answers to the following questions: ▪ What topic are you going to write on? ▪ Why is this topic worth to be explored? ▪ What bibliography are you going to resort to? The topic of your term paper should be approved by the professor in the fifth week of the course. Week 6: The Identity of the Person: Between Animals and “Posthumans” (a) Recorded lecture discussing the following: ▪ What is the difference between human beings and other animals? ▪ What is the difference between human beings and “posthumans”? (b) Readings: indicated by the instructor (in handouts). (c) Assignments/Activities/Discussions: Please answer the question: ▪ What is that which defines the range of our humanity (against the background of animal nature and “posthuman nature”)? Week 7: The Potentiality of the Person: Towards Happiness by Means of Vitrue (a) Recorded lecture discussing the following: ▪ Are we potential persons or rather persons with potential? ▪ What is the Thomistic approach to virtue? (b) Readings: indicated by the instructor (in handouts). (c) Assignments/Activities/Discussions: Please answer the question: ▪ Are we potential persons or persons with potential? Why? Week 8: Natural Law and Human Subjectivity: Towards the Areas of the Person’s Transcendence over Nature (a) Recorded lecture discussing the following: ▪ What do the two commandments of love have in common with natural law? ▪ Why does Aquinas think that the two commandments of love are knowable to natural human reason? ▪ Why is it plausible to regard Aquinas’ theology-based considerations as binding for natural human reason? (b) Readings: indicated by the instructor (in handouts). (c) Assignments/Activities/Discussions: Please answer the question: ▪ Is it possible for persons’ decisions to be morally good, while contrary to natural law at the same time? Please give an example. Week 9: The Areas of the Person’s Transcendence over Nature: (1) Cognition (a) Recorded lecture discussing the following: ▪ Thomas’s theory of self-knowledge: What accounts for the fact that human experience always takes place from the viewpoint of a subject? ▪ Thomas’s theory of self-knowledge: What accounts for the fact that one experiences oneself, the subject of one’s experience, as “I,” in the first person? ▪ Thomas’s theory of self-knowledge: What accounts for the continuity in this first-person viewpoint? (b) Readings: indicated by the instructor (in handouts). (c) Assignments/Activities/Discussions: Please answer the question: ▪ What is denoted by the term “I” in Thomas’s theory of self-knowledge? What is its essence? 3 Week 10: The Areas of the Person’s Transcendence over Nature: (2) Freedom (a) Recorded lecture discussing the following: ▪ St. Thomas Aquinas’s understanding of the correlation between Divine causality and human freedom ▪ Six Thomistic interpretations of Aquinas’s position ▪ A Thomistic personalist model of the relationship between Divine causality and created freedom developed by Mark K. Spencer (b) Readings: indicated by the instructor (in handouts). (c) Assignments/Activities/Discussions: Please answer the question: ▪ Is there any strongest part in Mark K. Spencer’s model of the relationship between Divine causality and created freedom? Or is there any weakest part in it? Please try to explain. Week 11: The Areas of the Person’s Transcendence over Nature: (3) Love (a) Recorded lecture discussing the following: ▪ The functions and effects of love (love and its effects; love and apprehension; love and complacency; love and human acts; love and final end; love as an aptitude to an end; love as a uniting principle) ▪ The interpersonal character of human love (love for others is based on the natural love of self; self-love leads to the love of
Recommended publications
  • RELG 399 Fall2019
    McGill University School of Religious Studies RELG 399 TEXTS OF CHRISTIAN SPIRITUALITY (Late Antiquity) In the Fall Term of 2019 this seminar course will focus on Christian spirituality in Late Antiquity with close study and interpretation of Aurelius Augustine’s spiritual odyssey the Confessiones, his account of creation in De genesi ad litteram, and his handbook of hermeneutics De doctrina Christiana. We will also read Ancius Manlius Severinus Boethius’s treatment of theodicy in De consolatione philosophiae, his De Trinitate, and selections from De Musica. Professor: Torrance Kirby Office Hours: Birks 206, Tuesdays/Thursdays, 10:00–11:00 am Email: [email protected] Birks Building, Room 004A Tuesdays/Thursdays 4:05–5:25 pm COURSE SYLLABUS—FALL TERM 2019 Date Reading 3 September INTRODUCTION 5 September Aurelius Augustine, Confessiones Book I, Early Years 10 September Book II, Theft of Pears 12 September Book III, Adolescence and Student Life 17 September Book IV, Manichee and Astrologer 19 September Book V, Carthage, Rome, and Milan *Confirm Mid-Term Essay Topics (1500-2000 words) (NB Consult the Style Sheet, essay-writing guidelines and evaluation rubric in the appendix to the syllabus.) 24 September Book VI, Secular Ambitions and Conflicts 26 September Book VII, Neoplatonic Quest for the Good 1 October Book VIII, Tolle, lege; tolle, lege 3 October Book IX, Vision at Ostia 8 October Book X, 1-26 Memory *Mid-term Essays due at beginning of class. Essay Conferences to be scheduled for week of 21 October 10 October Book X, 27-43 “Late have I loved you” 15 October Book XI, Time and Eternity 17 October Book XII, Creation Essay Conferences begin this week, Birks 206.
    [Show full text]
  • Metaphysics Today and Tomorrow*
    1 Metaphysics Today and Tomorrow* Raphaël Millière École normale supérieure, Paris – October 2011 Translated by Mark Ohm with the assistance of Leah Orth, Jon Cogburn, and Emily Beck Cogburn “By metaphysics, I do not mean those abstract considerations of certain imaginary properties, the principal use of which is to furnish the wherewithal for endless dispute to those who want to dispute. By this science I mean the general truths which can serve as principles for the particular sciences.” Malebranche Dialogues on Metaphysics and Religion 1. The interminable agony of metaphysics Throughout the twentieth century, numerous philosophers sounded the death knell of metaphysics. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Rudolf Carnap, Martin Heidegger, Gilbert Ryle, J. L. Austin, Jacques Derrida, Jürgen Habermas, Richard Rorty, and, henceforth, Hilary Putnam: a great many tutelary figures have extolled the rejection, the exceeding, the elimination, or the deconstruction of first philosophy. All these necrological chronicles do not have the same radiance, the same seriousness, nor the same motivations, but they all agree to dismiss the discipline, which in the past was considered “the queen of the sciences”, with a violence at times comparable to the prestige it commanded at the time of its impunity. Even today, certain philosophers hastily spread the tragic news with contempt for philosophical inquiry, as if its grave solemnity bestowed upon it some obviousness. Thus, Franco Volpi writes: ‘Grand metaphysics is dead!’ is the slogan which applies to the majority of contemporary philosophers, whether continentals or of analytic profession. They all treat metaphysics as a dead dog.1 In this way, the “path of modern thought” would declare itself vociferously “anti- metaphysical and finally post-metaphysical”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foundations of Economic Personalism: Daniel Rush Finn Promise and Peril Saint John’S University
    Journal of Markets & Morality Volume 6, Number 2 (Fall 2003): 599–615 Copyright © 2003 The Foundations of Economic Personalism: Daniel Rush Finn Promise and Peril Saint John’s University The Acton Institute’s three-volume series on the Foundations of Economic Personalism contributes much to the dialogue between theology and economics. This article, however, identifies a number of shortcomings. These include an overly individualistic bias and a reliance on the Austrian school of economics that are not consonant with Christian and especially Catholic social thought on economic life. There is a certain naiveté about the philosophy of science and an artificial bifurcation between “economic” life (where values are assumed to be subjective) and the rest of life (where objective values are endorsed). The dia- logue between theology and economics is badly needed, but it requires a strong dose of self-criticism from all its participants. Introduction It is all too rare for theologians and economists to work seriously together. In an effort to overcome this unfortunate tendency, the Center for Economic Personalism at the Acton Institute commissioned and published a three- volume work titled Foundations of Economic Personalism. The first volume is entitled Beyond Self Interest: A Personalist Approach to Human Action, by Gregory R. Beabout, Ricardo F. Crespo, Stephen J. Grabill, Kim Paffenroth, and Kyle Swan. The second volume is Human Nature and the Discipline of Economics: Personalist Anthropology and Economic Methodology, by Patricia Donohue-White, Stephen J. Grabill, Christopher Westley, and Gloria Zúñiga. The third volume is entitled The Free Person and the Free Economy: 599 The Foundations of Economic Daniel Rush Finn Personalism: Promise and Peril A Personalist View of Market Economics, by Anthony J.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Ways Theology Uses Philosophy
    Six Ways Theology The Context Since I teach philosophy to seminarians,the UsesPhilosophy questionwhich is often raisedis "how is philosophy used by theology?" My answers,at first, did not David Foster. Ph.D. move pastthe generalitiesthat philosophy is the in- strumentof theologyor that philosophytaught you to Yote: This paper wasfirst presentedin Venice,April, 1996 at think logically. Realizing the inadequacyof those 'he International Conferenceon Preparation for Priesthood answers,I began to study the relationship. with the support of the Wethersfield Institute. As a result,this paperaims to describein betterr detail how theology usesphilosophy. Its main con- tributionsare 1) a descriptionof the instrumentaluses of philosophy,2) the identification of the intrinsic role of philosophy as material to theology. Becauseof the focus on the theologicaluses of philosophy,I will leave aside other contributionsof philosophyto theology students,such as, helping them to understandthe modern world, disciplining their thinking, stimulatingcreative thought, and providing order for a complex world. These contributions of philosophyare important, but are not unique to the- ology. The Traditional Ways Theology UsesPhilosophy Four main uses quickly emergedas a working hypothesis:philosophy serves theology as a preamble, a tool, a bridge, and a shield.2 Theseare the more traditional ways of describing how theology uses philosophy.The list eventually grew to six. Philosophyis a preamblein thatit preparespeople for understandingthe Faith. It is a tool in that it is usedas an instrumentto better understandthe Faith. It is a bridge in that it provides common principles where believer and nonbeliever can meet. It is a shieldin thatit can be usedto defendthe Faith against argumentsof nonbelievers3.The seconduse, as a tool, is the most commonand the most importantto articulatefor theologystudents.
    [Show full text]
  • Setting Aside Naturalism in Favor of Personhood in Extreme Cases
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2011 Restoring the Balance: Setting Aside Naturalism in Favor of Personhood in Extreme Cases Brian Joseph Buckley Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Buckley, Brian Joseph, "Restoring the Balance: Setting Aside Naturalism in Favor of Personhood in Extreme Cases" (2011). Dissertations. 216. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/216 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2011 Brian Joseph Buckley LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO RESTORING THE BALANCE: SETTING ASIDE NATURALISM IN FAVOR OF PERSONHOOD IN EXTREME CASES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN PHILOSOPHY BY BRIAN JOSEPH BUCKLEY CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MAY 2011 Copyright by Brian J. Buckley, 2011 All rights reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER TWO: TAYLOR AND HABERMAS ON NATURALISM AND THE IMPORTANCE OF THE HUMAN SCIENCES 11 Introduction 11 Charles Taylor and Naturalism 14 Scenarios 40 Habermas and the Concerns for The Future of
    [Show full text]
  • The Theological and Pastoral Influences of St. Bonaventure's Critical Retrieval of Joachim of Fiore on Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI
    Providence College DigitalCommons@Providence Theology Graduate Theses Theology Spring 2013 Loving in the Present: The Theological and Pastoral Influences of St. Bonaventure's Critical Retrieval of Joachim of Fiore on Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI William L. Patenaude Providence College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.providence.edu/theology_graduate_theses Part of the Religion Commons Patenaude, William L., "Loving in the Present: The Theological and Pastoral Influences of St. Bonaventure's Critical Retrieval of Joachim of Fiore on Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI" (2013). Theology Graduate Theses. 1. https://digitalcommons.providence.edu/theology_graduate_theses/1 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theology at DigitalCommons@Providence. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theology Graduate Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Providence. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Graduate Thesis Submission Loving in the Present: The Theological and Pastoral Influences of St. Bonaventure’s Critical Retrieval of Joachim of Fiore on Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI. Submitted by: William L. Patenaude Providence College April 24, 2011 Loving in the Present William Patenaude Introduction The influences of St. Bonaventure on Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI1 have been noted in studies by Fr. Aidan Nichols O.P., Tracey Rowland, Fr. Maximilian Heinrich Heim, and others.2 A dedicated overview of Bonaventurian thought within the writings of the current Holy Father, however, is necessary to more fully appreciate the roots of Ratzinger/Benedict XVI’s theology and its imprint on (and implications for) Catholic theology, anthropology, and pastoral practices. The present work intends to demonstrate that Joseph Ratzinger’s 1957 thesis on St.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Aquinas College Newsletter Fall 2018
    quinas A C s o a l Thomas Aquinas College Newsletter m l e o g h e T Fall 2018 Volume 46, Issue 3 1971 Eastward Bound! College Receives Approval for New England Campus ulminating a rigorous process that campus and, thanks be to God, that day Cbegan in the spring of 2017, Thomas has arrived.” Aquinas College has received approval Notably, the College’s need for expan- from the Massachusetts Board of Higher sion counters a 50-year trend in higher Education to operate a branch campus education, in which more than a quarter in Western Massachusetts, where it will of the country’s small liberal arts schools award the degree of Bachelor of Arts in have either closed, merged, or abandoned Liberal Arts. The decision sets the stage their missions. “At a time when more for Thomas Aquinas College, New Eng- than a few liberal arts colleges have had land, to open its doors in fall 2019. to close,” says R. Scott Turicchi, chairman The Board’s approval comes as the of the College’s Board of Governors, “it is result of a thorough and rigorous appli- a testament to the excellence of Thomas cation process conducted by its legal Aquinas College’s unique program of and academic affairs staff at the Massa- Catholic liberal education and to its good chusetts Department of Higher Educa- stewardship that the school has received tion. Its grant of authority is subject to school in Northfield, Massachusetts, course, friends’ donations to cover the approval to operate a second campus.” stipulations, the most important of which which has been shuttered since 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Kreeft BOSTON COLLEGE Faith and Reason: the Philosophy of Religion Professor Peter Kreeft Boston College
    FAITH AND REASON: THE PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION COURSE GUIDE Professor Peter Kreeft BOSTON COLLEGE Faith and Reason: The Philosophy of Religion Professor Peter Kreeft Boston College Recorded Books™ is a trademark of Recorded Books, LLC. All rights reserved. Faith and Reason: The Philosophy of Religion Professor Peter Kreeft Executive Producer John J. Alexander Executive Editor Donna F. Carnahan RECORDING Producer - David Markowitz Director - Matthew Cavnar COURSE GUIDE Editor - James Gallagher Design - Edward White Lecture content ©2005 by Peter Kreeft Course guide ©2005 by Recorded Books, LLC 72005 by Recorded Books, LLC Cover image: Ceiling of the Sistene Chapel, The Vatican, Rome © Clipart.com #UT064 ISBN: 978-1-4193-4767-2 All beliefs and opinions expressed in this audio/video program and accompanying course guide are those of the author and not of Recorded Books, LLC, or its employees. Course Syllabus Faith and Reason: The Philosophy of Religion About Your Professor...................................................................................................4 Introduction...................................................................................................................5 Lecture 1 What Is Religion? Why Is It Worth Thinking About? .............................6 Lecture 2 Atheism................................................................................................12 Lecture 3 The Problem of Evil .............................................................................17 Lecture 4 Arguments for God’s Existence
    [Show full text]
  • A Thomistic Understanding of Happiness
    The University of Notre Dame Australia ResearchOnline@ND Theses 2013 A Thomistic Understanding of Happiness Christian Stephens University of Notre Dame Australia Follow this and additional works at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses Part of the Religion Commons COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 WARNING The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further copying or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Do not remove this notice. Publication Details Stephens, C. (2013). A Thomistic Understanding of Happiness (Master of Philosophy (MPhil)). University of Notre Dame Australia. https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses/79 This dissertation/thesis is brought to you by ResearchOnline@ND. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@ND. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Thomistic Understanding of Happiness Master of Philosophy Thesis Christian Stephens th 8 August 2013 Feast of St Mary of the Cross I am deeply grateful to the Fathers at the Seminary of the Good Shepherd, especially Fr Bernard Gordon, for helping me to discover the genius of St. Thomas. I would also like to thank the Staff at the School of Philosophy and Theology, Notre Dame, Sydney, for their constant support. Most especially, Dr Angus Brook, whose wisdom, patience and encouragement forged my love of St Thomas and made this work possible. To Chloe, whose faith, hope and love sustained the man behind this work so that it could come to completion. Finally, to St.
    [Show full text]
  • Faith and Reason 1 Completed = Test Question on Diocesan Religion Test
    Date Comments and edits Faith and Reason 1 Completed ∆ = Test question on Diocesan Religion Test Faith and Reason as found in the Nicene Creed I. “I believe…” A. Students will articulate the relationship between faith and reason. 1. Faith (CCC 878) a. Heb 11:1 “Faith is the realization of what is hoped for and evidence of things not seen.” ∆ b. Belief is only possible through continuous grace and the Holy Spirit, CCC153 ∆ c. We will be saved by God’s grace if we cooperate with it d. Truly a human act, CCC 154 ∆ e. In faith the human intellect and will cooperate with divine grace, CCC 155 (relationship between faith and freedom is any act of Faith must be made freely) f. There are external proofs of God’s revelation that join the internal helps of the Holy Spirit, CCC 156 g. We profess this revelation in the creed, celebrate it in the sacraments, live by right conduct, and respond to it in prayer. h. Distinction between Fides Quae and Fides Qua : The faith that we believe with (theological virtue) and the faith that we believe in (objective content) 2. Reason and its relationship with faith (see teachings of John Paul II and St. Thomas Aquinas) ∆ 3. Faith is reasonable B. The learner will be able to dialogue regarding challenges about the Catholic Faith through use of the Magisterium, Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition and reason. 1. Introduction ∆ a. 1 Pet 3:15-16 “Always be ready to give an explanation to anyone who asks you for a reason for your ∆ hope but do it with gentleness and reverence.” ∆ b.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2012-2013 Electives
    FALL 2012-2013 ELECTIVES COURSE # CR LV COURSE TITLE SCHEDULE INSTRUCTOR PL11601 3 1 MEDIEVAL RELIGION&THOUGHT T TH 9* BROWN CULTURAL DIVERSITY *ALTID 3 U TH11601: MEDIEVAL RELIGION&THOUGHT T TH 9* BROWN CULTURAL DIVERSITY PL16001 3 1 CHALLENGE OF JUSTICE T TH 3* POPE *ALTID 3 U TH16001: CHALLENGE OF JUSTICE T TH 3* POPE PL16002 3 1 CHALLENGE OF JUSTICE M W 3* SWEENEY *ALTID 3 U TH16002: CHALLENGE OF JUSTICE M W 3* SWEENEY PL23301 3 1 VALUES/SOC SERV/HLTH CARE TH 4 30-6 50 MANZO PL25901 3 1 PERSP:WAR/AGGRESSION T TH 12* MULLANE *ALTID 3 U TH32701: PERSPECT:WAR/AGGRES I T TH 12* MULLANE *ALTID 3 U SC25001: PERSP:WAR/AGGRESSION T TH 12* MULLANE PL26101 3 1 TELLING TRUTHS I W 3-4 50 HIRSCH PL26401 3 1 LOGIC M W F 2 SARCA PL26402 3 1 LOGIC M W F 3 SARCA PL26403 3 1 LOGIC M W F 12 ANDERSON PL29101 3 1 PHILOS OF COMMUNITY I T 4 30-6 20 MC MENAMIN PL31401 3 1 MIND AND BODY M W F 11 TACELLI PL37701 3 1 ETHICAL THEORY T TH 12* GARCIA PL40301 3 1 DOES GOD EXIST? M W 3* TACELLI PL40501 3 1 GREEK PHILOSOPHY M W F 11 BYERS PL40601 3 1 MODERN PHILOSOPHY T TH 10 30* SOLERE PL44201 3 1 ROMANTICISM & IDEALISM T TH 1 30* RUMBLE PL47001 3 1 PHIL OF WORLD RELIGIONS T TH 3* KREEFT CULTURAL DIVERSITY PL49301 3 1 BIOETHICS:ISS/HEALTHCARE M W F 2 STAN PL50001 3 3 PHILOSOPHY OF LAW T TH 1 30* TREJO-MATHYS *ALTID 3 G LL66901: PHILOSOPHY OF LAW T TH 1 30* TREJO-MATHYS PL51201 3 3 PHILOSOPHY OF EXISTENCE T TH 3* KEARNEY PL51701 3 3 KANT&KANTIANS MORAL LAW T TH 3* LOTT PL53101 3 3 DISC&METAPHYSICS ETHICS T TH 4 30* GARCIA PL55001 3 1 CAPSTONE:BUILDING A LIFE M 3-5
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Angelic Order and Human Growth
    Volume XXI - (2020) Angelic Order and Human Growth PANDASITES 2 • Burton, Kathleen Journal of Unification Studies Vol. 21, 2020 - Pages 77-88 Why does Divine Principle place little emphasis on the topic of angels, yet the course of restoration history was based on the failure of a human-angelic relationship? The Principle of Creation gives no guidelines for ideal interactions between the two worlds. True Mother (Mrs. Hak Ja Han) expects Heavenly Parent's Holy Community[1] to be the harbinger of world peace and God's ideal, yet the contingency of that reality must manifest not only in our human world but in the angelic one; for that is God's Original Design. We are not meant to have all the answers, yet Heavenly Parent does not usually use divine revelation in these matters. True Father had to work hard to understand the Fall. The same is expected of us. In this post- Foundation Day[2] reality when Unificationists believe that the ideal world beyond the Fall should be unfolding, we must work hard to ask the questions that lead to the "what should have been" in the first human- angelic relationship. Yet the Unification Church lacks expertise on angels. Those members that do are largely in the West. Nora Spurgin's Circles of Angels[3] may be the best work on angels that the church has produced, yet it remains untranslated and hence unavailable to our Asian membership. The West has the great advantage of the Judeo- Christian foundation; there are over 300 references to angels in the Bible.
    [Show full text]