2012 Nsw Architecture Awards – Jury Citations
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Campbell Housing Apartments)
Australian Capital Territory Heritage (Decision about Registration for Campbell Housing Apartments). Notice 2011 Notifiable Instrument NI 2011 - 742 made under the Heritage Act 2004 section 42 Notice of Decision about Registration 1. Revocation This instrument replaces NI 2011 – 489 2. Name of instrument This instrument is the Heritage (Decision about Registration for Campbell Housing Apartments) Notice 2011 - 3. Registration details of the place Registration details of the place are at Attachment A: Register entry for Campbell Housing Apartments . 4. Reason for decision The ACT Heritage Council has decided that the Campbell Housing Apartments meets one or more of the heritage significance criteria at s 10 of the Heritage Act 2004. The register entry is at Attachment A. 5. Date of Registration 1 December 2011 Gerhard Zatschler Secretary ACT Heritage Council 1 December 2011 Authorised by the ACT Parliamentary Counsel—also accessible at www.legislation.act.gov.au AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY HERITAGE REGISTER (Registration Details) Place No: For the purposes of s. 41 of the Heritage Act 2004, an entry to the heritage register has been prepared by the ACT Heritage Council for the following place: Campbell Housing Apartments, 6 & 8 Edmondson Street Campbell (Part) Block 15 Section 9 Campbell DATE OF REGISTRATION Notified: 1 December 2011 Notifiable Instrument: 2011/ Copies of the Register Entry are available for inspection at the ACT Heritage Unit. For further information please contact: The Secretary ACT Heritage Council GPO Box 158, Canberra, ACT 2601 Telephone: 13 22 81 Facsimile: (02) 6207 2229 IDENTIFICATION OF THE PLACE Authorised by the ACT Parliamentary Counsel—also accessible at www.legislation.act.gov.au Campbell Housing Apartments (Blamey Heights), 6 and 8 Edmondson Street, Campbell (Part) Block 15, Section 9, Campbell, Canberra Central STATEMENT OF HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCE This statement refers to the Heritage Significance of the place as required in s12(d) of the Heritage Act 2004. -
Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review
Attachment B Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Prepared for City of Sydney Issue C x January 2018 Project number 13 0581 Modern Movement in Central Sydney x Heritage Study Review EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study was undertaken to provide a contextual framework to improve understanding post World War II and Modern Movement architecture and places in Central Sydney, which is a significant and integral component of its architectural heritage. Findings x The study period (1945-1975) was an exciting and challenging era that determined much of the present physical form of Central Sydney and resulted in outstanding architectural and civic accomplishments. x There were an unprecedented number of development projects undertaken during the study period, which resulted in fundamental changes to the physical fabric and character of Central Sydney. x The buildings are an historical record of the changing role of Australia in an international context and Sydney’s new-found role as a major world financial centre. Surviving buildings provide crucial evidence of the economic and social circumstances of the study period. x Surviving buildings record the adaptation of the Modern Movement to local conditions, distinguishing them from Modern Movement buildings in other parts of the world. x The overwhelming preponderance of office buildings, which distinguishes Central Sydney from all other parts of NSW, is offset by the presence of other building typologies such as churches, community buildings and cultural institutions. These often demonstrate architectural accomplishment. x The triumph of humane and rational urban planning can be seen in the creation of pedestrian- friendly areas and civic spaces of great accomplishment such as Australia Square, Martin Place and Sydney Square. -
AIA REGISTER Jan 2015
AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS REGISTER OF SIGNIFICANT ARCHITECTURE IN NSW BY SUBURB Firm Design or Project Architect Circa or Start Date Finish Date major DEM Building [demolished items noted] No Address Suburb LGA Register Decade Date alterations Number [architect not identified] [architect not identified] circa 1910 Caledonia Hotel 110 Aberdare Street Aberdare Cessnock 4702398 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] circa 1905 Denman Hotel 143 Cessnock Road Abermain Cessnock 4702399 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1906 St Johns Anglican Church 13 Stoke Street Adaminaby Snowy River 4700508 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] undated Adaminaby Bowling Club Snowy Mountains Highway Adaminaby Snowy River 4700509 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] circa 1920 Royal Hotel Camplbell Street corner Tumut Street Adelong Tumut 4701604 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1936 Adelong Hotel (Town Group) 67 Tumut Street Adelong Tumut 4701605 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] undated Adelonia Theatre (Town Group) 84 Tumut Street Adelong Tumut 4701606 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] undated Adelong Post Office (Town Group) 80 Tumut Street Adelong Tumut 4701607 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] undated Golden Reef Motel Tumut Street Adelong Tumut 4701725 PHILIP COX RICHARDSON & TAYLOR PHILIP COX and DON HARRINGTON 1972 Akuna Bay Marina Liberator General San Martin Drive, Ku-ring-gai Akuna Bay Warringah -
Airport OLS Penetrations by Existing and Planned Structures in the Sydney and Brisbane CBD
1 Airport OLS Penetrations by Existing and Planned Structures in the Sydney and Brisbane CBD It is crucial that the safety implications arising from the recent incidents involving a Qantas airbus A380 following take-off at Singapore airport on the 4th of November, 2010 and a B747 departing the same airport two days later are fully appreciated by governments at all levels. Although the problems were serious enough, they could have been a lot worse and could well have occurred at Brisbane or Sydney airports. To further illustrate what happened to the A380, the following interim list of 18 items damaged by the exploding engine was released to the media on the 11/11/2010. 1.Massive fuel leak in the left mid fuel tank (there are 11 tanks, including in the horizontal stabiliser on the tail); 2.Massive fuel leak in the left inner fuel tank; 3. A hole on the flap fairing big enough to climb through; 4 The aft gallery in the fuel system failed, preventing many fuel transfer functions; 5 Problem jettisoning fuel; 6 Massive hole in the upper wingsurface; 7 Partial failure of leading edge slats; 8 Partial failure of speed brakes/groundspoilers; 9 Shrapnel damage to the flaps; 10 Total loss of all hydraulic fluid in one of the jet'stwo systems; 11 Manual extension of landing gear; 12 Loss of one generator and associatedsystems; 13 Loss of brake anti-skid system; 14 No.1 engine could not be shut down in theusual way after landing because of major damage to systems; 15 No.1 engine could not beshut down using the fire switch, which meant fire extinguishers would not work on thatengine; 16 ECAM (electronic centralised aircraft monitor) warnings about the major fuelimbalance (because of fuel leaks on left side) could not be fixed with cross-feeding; 17 Fuelwas trapped in the trim tank (in the tail) creating a balance problem for landing; 18 Left wingforward spar penetrated by debris With so much damage to the aircraft, it’s clear that all on board were extremely lucky. -
Copyright Agency Licensing Restrictions
COPYRIGHT AGENCY LICENSING RESTRICTIONS PRIOR APPROVAL The following artists or listed artworks require prior approval before Copyright Agency can license these works. Please contact Copyright Agency for approval [email protected]. The information in this document is current as at 22 September 2018. Before relying on this information please make sure you have the latest version of the document which you can get from https://www.copyright.com.au/licences-permission/excluded-works/ or by contacting Copyright Agency at [email protected]. Agency First Name middle Surname Alias Artwork VEGAP Bárbara Allende Gil De Biedma Ouka Leele All works VEGAP Hermenegildo Anglada Camarasa Anglada Camarasa All works VEGAP Luis Alexander Apostol Ache Alexander Apóstol All works VEGAP Ignacio Arias Careaga Nacho Arias All works ADAGP Antonin Artaud All works Copyright Agency David Aspden All works ADAGP Kader Attia All works require approval for auction house licensing only Copyright Agency Susan Juliet Baker Soxy Fleming All works Copyright Agency Raluca Mihaela Ballenger Ballenger Constantin All works Copyright Agency Bronwyn Maree Bancroft All works Pro Litteris Luis Barragan All works Copyright Agency Susannah Blaxill Susannah Jenkins All works SABAM Marcel Louis Broodthaers All works VEGAP Joan Brossa I Cuervo Joan Brossa All works VEGAP Santiago Calatrava Valls Santiago Calatrava All works Valls Calder Foundation Alexander Calder All works Copyright Agency Criss Canning All works require approval for auction house licensing -
Urban Design in Central Sydney 1945–2002: Laissez-Faire and Discretionary Traditions in the Accidental City John Punter
Progress in Planning 63 (2005) 11–160 www.elsevier.com/locate/pplann Urban design in central Sydney 1945–2002: Laissez-Faire and discretionary traditions in the accidental city John Punter School of City and Regional Planning, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3WA, UK Abstract This paper explores the laissez faire and discretionary traditions adopted for development control in Central Sydney over the last half century. It focuses upon the design dimension of control, and the transition from a largely design agnostic system up until 1988, to the serious pursuit of design excellence by 2000. Six eras of design/development control are identified, consistent with particular market conditions of boom and bust, and with particular political regimes at State and City levels. The constant tensions between State Government and City Council, and the interventions of state advisory committees and development agencies, Tribunals and Courts are explored as the pursuit of design quality moved from being a perceived barrier to economic growth to a pre-requisite for global competitiveness in the pursuit of international investment and tourism. These tensions have given rise to the description of Central Sydney as ‘the Accidental City’. By contrast, the objective of current policy is to consistently achieve ‘the well-mannered and iconic’ in architecture and urban design. Beginning with the regulation of building height by the State in 1912, the Council’s development approval powers have been severely curtailed by State committees and development agencies, by two suspensions of the Council, and more recently (1989) by the establishment of a joint State- Council committee to assess major development applications. -
Architecture Technology and Process
Alis-Fm.qxd 5/8/04 11:25 AM Page i ARCHITECTURE, TECHNOLOGY AND PROCESS Alis-Fm.qxd 5/8/04 11:25 AM Page ii For Ursula and all the other generous friends, both near and far, professional and non-professional, who have given me so much encouragement over the years Alis-Fm.qxd 5/8/04 11:25 AM Page iii ARCHITECTURE, TECHNOLOGY AND PROCESS Chris Abel Alis-Fm.qxd 6/8/04 7:02 PM Page iv Architectural Press An imprint of Elsevier Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP 30 Corporate Drive, Burlington, MA 01803 First published 2004 Copyright © 2004, Chris Abel. All rights reserved The right of Chris Abel to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 No part of this publication may be reproduced in any material form (including photocopying or storing in any medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some other use of this publication) without the written permission of the copyright holder except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London, England W1T 4LP. Applications for the copyright holder’s written permission to reproduce any part of this publication should be addressed to the publisher Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone: (+44) 1865 843830, fax: (+44) 1865 853333, e-mail: [email protected]. -
Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review , Item 5. PDF 13 MB
Attachment B Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review 40 Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Prepared for City of Sydney Issue C x January 2018 Project number 13 0581 41 Modern Movement in Central Sydney x Heritage Study Review EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study was undertaken to provide a contextual framework to improve understanding post World War II and Modern Movement architecture and places in Central Sydney, which is a significant and integral component of its architectural heritage. Findings x The study period (1945-1975) was an exciting and challenging era that determined much of the present physical form of Central Sydney and resulted in outstanding architectural and civic accomplishments. x There were an unprecedented number of development projects undertaken during the study period, which resulted in fundamental changes to the physical fabric and character of Central Sydney. x The buildings are an historical record of the changing role of Australia in an international context and Sydney’s new-found role as a major world financial centre. Surviving buildings provide crucial evidence of the economic and social circumstances of the study period. x Surviving buildings record the adaptation of the Modern Movement to local conditions, distinguishing them from Modern Movement buildings in other parts of the world. x The overwhelming preponderance of office buildings, which distinguishes Central Sydney from all other parts of NSW, is offset by the presence of other building typologies such as churches, community buildings and cultural institutions. These often demonstrate architectural accomplishment. x The triumph of humane and rational urban planning can be seen in the creation of pedestrian- friendly areas and civic spaces of great accomplishment such as Australia Square, Martin Place and Sydney Square. -
Downloaded by [Central Uni Library Bucharest] at 03:22 26 September 2013 Concrete Slab
Encyclopedia of 20th-century architecture 428 Hopkins’s Patera system, is also exoskeletal but, in contrast with the central spine, is more restrained. Anthony Hunt Associates designed the steel structure, and the lightweight structures unit of Ove Arup and Partners designed the fabric roof. A zoned servicing strategy supports the contrasting spatial and structural characters of the central spine and flanking wings. The winter garden and test station, although weather tight, are conceived as quasi-external spaces; the labs are sealed spaces in which tightly controlled environmental conditions for research can be maintained; and the offices have opening windows and sunshading that can be adjusted by the occupants. The building works as an icon in the heroic modernist tradition and, by addressing human needs, significantly advances the idea of the workplace. Transparency—with fully glazed walls between winter garden, test station, and labs and a glazed external envelope—creates a high degree of visual interaction both within the building and between the building and the outside world. An egalitarian workplace laced together by open meeting spaces and the generosity of the winter garden integrates disparate functions—clean and dirty, quiet and noisy, front and back of house. This social and programmatic integration is reiterated in the marriage of orthogonal and curvilinear geometries, of compressive and tensile structures, and of rational Miesian discipline with more exuberant expressionism. This building for Schlumberger was Michael Hopkins’s first use of a tensile fabric structure and the first large-scale architectural use of Teflon-coated fabric in the United Kingdom. Hopkins would further explore fabric structures in subsequent projects including the Mound Stand at Lord’s Cricket Ground (1987), the amenity building and ventilation towers at Inland Revenue (1995), and the Younger Universe Pavilion in Edinburgh (1998). -
Expanded Architecture
Expanded Architecture Temporal 1 Spatial Practices 2 Edited by Claudia Perren and Sarah Breen Lovett 3 Cover Images 1. Harry Seidler & Associates, Australia Square, floor plan, designed 1964 (diagram date ca. 1969). 2. Harry Seidler & Associates, Grosvenor Place, typical office floor plan for I.E.L. tenancy Level 44, 1987. 3. Harry Seidler & Associates, Capita Centre, 9 Castlereagh Street, plan of top executive floor Level 31, 1984–89. Endpaper Images (Prolog) 1.1 Australia Square, tower as viewed from AWA Tower with Sydney Opera House in rear, Photo: Max Dupain, 1968. 1.2 Australia Square in construction, 1965. 1.3 Australia Square tower “keyhole shot”, viewed through the opening from stairs from plaza level, Photo: Max Dupain, 1968. Endpaper Images (Epilog) 2.1 Grosvenor Place, tower and Sydney Harbour in rear, Photo: Eric Sierins, 1989. 1.4 Alexander Calder, Crossed Blades, Australia Square, 1967, Photo: Max Dupain, date unknown. 2.2 Grosvenor Place, tower and north plaza entry from George St. March, Photo: Max Dupain, 1990. 1.5 Australia Square, Photo: Max Dupain, 1968. 2.3 Grosvenor Place, tower as seen from the curved screen wall of the north plaza, Photo: Eric Sierins, 1992. 2.4 Grosvenor Place, Photo: Max Dupain, 1990. 3.1 Capita Centre, executive roof terrace, Photo: Max Dupain, 1990. 2.5 Grosvenor Place, Photo: Max Dupain, 1990. 3.2 Lobby of Capita Centre, showing porcelain mural by Lin Utzon, Photo: Max Dupain, 1990. 3.4 Capita Centre, 9 Castlereagh Street, Photo: Max Dupain, 1990. 3.3 Façade of Capita Centre, 9 Castlereaght Street, Photo: Max Dupain, 1990. -
Australian Institute of Architects Register of Significant Buildings in Nsw Master
AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS REGISTER OF SIGNIFICANT BUILDINGS IN NSW MASTER O A & K HENDERSON / LOUIS HENDERSON A & K HENDERSON OF MELBOURNE, rear by circa 1935 1940 1991, 1993, 1994, T&G Building 555 Dean Street Albury Albury City 4703473 Card LOUIS HARRISON 2006, 2008 H [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1912 Wilton House 105-109 Katoomba Street Katoomba Blue Mountains 4700146 Card S [architect not identified] [architect not identified] undated Korvette Store Katoomba Street Katoomba Blue Mountains 4700147 Card S [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1909 1940 (1925 Interior of The Paragon Cafe 63-69 Katoomba Street Katoomba Blue Mountains 4700148 Card Nos 65-67 H&E Sidegreaves) C [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1905 Kanowna Hostel 26 Wascoe Street Leura Blue Mountains 4700152 Card MM [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1938 Kingsford Smith Memorial Park Gates Katoomba Blue Mountains 4700153 Card S [architect not identified] [architect not identified] undated Shop Buildings 33-44 Katoomba Street Katoomba Blue Mountains 4700154 Card B [architect not identified] [architect not identified] undated Commonwealth Bank 68-72 Katoomba Street Katoomba Blue Mountains 4700155 Card S [architect not identified] [architect not identified] undated Shop Building 98 Katoomba Street Katoomba Blue Mountains 4700156 Card S [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1921 Soper Chambers 118-120 Katoomba Street Katoomba Blue Mountains 4700157 Card S [architect not -
06. Architecture Technology and Process 0750637927.Pdf
Alis-Fm.qxd 5/8/04 11:25 AM Page i ARCHITECTURE, TECHNOLOGY AND PROCESS Alis-Fm.qxd 5/8/04 11:25 AM Page ii For Ursula and all the other generous friends, both near and far, professional and non-professional, who have given me so much encouragement over the years Alis-Fm.qxd 5/8/04 11:25 AM Page iii ARCHITECTURE, TECHNOLOGY AND PROCESS Chris Abel Alis-Fm.qxd 6/8/04 7:02 PM Page iv Architectural Press An imprint of Elsevier Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP 30 Corporate Drive, Burlington, MA 01803 First published 2004 Copyright © 2004, Chris Abel. All rights reserved The right of Chris Abel to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 No part of this publication may be reproduced in any material form (including photocopying or storing in any medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some other use of this publication) without the written permission of the copyright holder except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London, England W1T 4LP. Applications for the copyright holder’s written permission to reproduce any part of this publication should be addressed to the publisher Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone: (+44) 1865 843830, fax: (+44) 1865 853333, e-mail: [email protected].