DOCSLIB.ORG

Ontario Ontario 2001 Census Divisions and Divisions De Recensement Et Subdivisions Census Consolidated Subdivisions De Recensement Unifiées, 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ontario Ontario 2001 Census Divisions and Divisions De Recensement Et Subdivisions Census Consolidated Subdivisions De Recensement Unifiées, 2001 MAP 2B CARTE 2B Ontario Ontario 2001 Census Divisions and Divisions de recensement et subdivisions Census Consolidated Subdivisions de recensement unifiées, 2001 LEGEND LÉGENDE 66 98 Census Régions agricoles Agricultural Region de recensement 71 60 Census Division Division de recensement 96 90 95 54 Census Consolidated Subdivision de 76 Subdivision recensement unifiée 51 49 46 Urban Centre Centre urbain 43 75 39 19 56 24 18 96 70 28 33 31 14 30 10 12 23 5 47 43 46 1 35 36 3 18 3 Ottawa 42 27 2 20 50 53 24 8 25 76 8 48 30 6 65 44 65 42 1 5 18 46 61 9 24 30 11 15 5 58 35 39 12 2 48 45 5 51 10 1 65 20 54 15 37 48 52 4 10 44 12 7 6 14 Census Agricultural Régions agricoles 10 15 46 35 30 36 30 40 42 Regions de recensement 11 16 23 20 17 Manitoba 15 21 70 39 26 30 3 20 14 45 10 5 1 Kingston 5 54 13 5 5 29 20 15 15 5 48 18 14 4 14 5 49 46 44 19 20 19 17 20 24 10 5 38 1 9 13 36 13 11 Quebec 28 5 5 20 Québec Toronto 3 4 2 1 Source: 2001 Census of Agriculture, Agriculture Division, Statistics Canada Source: Recensement de l'agriculture de 2001, Division de l'agriculture, Statistique Canada Map produced by Spatial Analysis and Geomatics Applications (SAGA), Agriculture Division, Statistics Canada, 2002 Carte créée par Analyse spatiale et applications géomatiques (ASAG), Division de l'agriculture, Statistique Canada, 2002 Ontario Map 2B / Carte 2B 2001 Census Divisions and Census Consolidated Subdivisions Divisions de recensement et subdivisions de recensement unifiées, 2001 Page 1 1 Stormont, Dundas and Glengarry 7 Leeds and Grenville 11 Lennox and Addington County 14 Northumberland County United Counties* United Counties 5 Loyalist 4 Brighton 5 South Glengarry 4 Edwardsburgh/Cardinal 15 Greater Napanee 14 Cramahe 11 South Stormont 6 Augusta 30 Stone Mills 19 Hamilton 12 Cornwall 14 Elizabethtown-Kitley 35 Addington Highlands 20 Port Hope and Hope 20 South Dundas 17 Front of Yonge 24 Alnwick/Haldimand 30 North Dundas 21 Leeds and the Thousand 12 Hastings County* 45 Campbellford/Seymour, 42 North Stormont Islands 1 Tyendinaga Percy, Hastings 50 North Glengarry 40 Rideau Lakes 5 Belleville 42 Athens 15 Quinte West 15 Peterborough County* 2 Prescott and Russell 52 Merrickville-Wolford 20 Stirling-Rawdon 3 Asphodel-Norwood United Counties 65 North Grenville 26 Centre Hastings 5 Otonabee-South Monaghan 1 East Hawkesbury 30 Tweed 13 Cavan-Millbrook- 10 Champlain 9 Lanark County 36 Madoc North Monaghan 23 Alfred and Plantagenet 1 Montague 46 Marmora 14 Peterborough 25 The Nation Municipality 10 Drummond/North Elmsley 48 Tudor and Cashel 15 Smith-Ennismore-Lakefield 36 Clarence-Rockland 15 Bathurst Burgess Sherbrooke 51 Limerick 23 Douro-Dummer 48 Russell 24 Beckwith 54 Wollaston 30 Havelock-Belmont-Methuen 30 Mississippi Mills 58 Faraday 37 North Kawartha 6 Ottawa Division 39 Lanark Highlands 61 Bancroft 44 Galway-Cavendish 8 Ottawa 65 Carlow/Mayo and Harvey 10 Frontenac County 76 Hastings Highlands 5 Frontenac Islands 16 Kawartha Lakes Division 10 Kingston 13 Prince Edward Division 10 Kawartha Lakes 20 South Frontenac 20 Prince Edward 35 Central Frontenac 45 North Frontenac ∗ Due to confidentiality constraints, the data for some or all of the geographic areas in this Census Division have been combined. See Geographic area amalgamations at the end of each data table for details. ∗ En raison des contraintes qu’impose le respect de la confidentialité, les données relatives à certaines ou toutes les régions géographiques pour cette division de recensement ont été combinées. Pour des renseignements détaillés, voir les Régions géographiques combinées qui apparaissent à la fin de chaque tableau. All Census Consolidated Subdivisions in italics had no farms in 2001. Toutes les subdivisions de recensement unifiées qui n’avaient pas de fermes en 2001 sont indiquées en italiques. Ontario Map 2B / Carte 2B 2001 Census Divisions and Census Consolidated Subdivisions Divisions de recensement et subdivisions de recensement unifiées, 2001 Page 2 18 Durham Regional Municipality* 44 Muskoka District Municipality* 47 Renfrew County* 49 Parry Sound District* 1 Pickering 2 Gravenhurst 3 McNab/Braeside 3 Seguin 5Ajax 18 Bracebridge 8 Greater Madawaska 5 The Archipelago 9Whitby 27 Lake of Bays 20 Brudenell, Lyndoch 12 McMurrich/Monteith 13 Oshawa 42 Huntsville and Raglan 14 Perry 17 Clarington 53 Muskoka Lakes 30 Madawaska Valley 18 Kearney 20 Scugog 65 Georgian Bay 33 Killaloe, Hagarty 19 Armour 29 Uxbridge and Richards 24 Ryerson 39 Brock 46 Haliburton County* 35 Bonnechere Valley 28 McKellar 5 Highlands East 43 Admaston/Bromley 31 McDougall 19 York Regional Municipality* 15 Minden Hills 46 Horton 39 Whitestone 28 Vaughan 18 Sherborne, Stanhope, 56 Whitewater Region 43 Magnetawan 36 Markham McClintock, Livingstone, 70 North Algona Wilberforce 46 Strong 38 Richmond Hill Lawrence and Nightingale 75 Laurentian Valley 51 Joly 44 Whitchurch-Stouffville 24 Dysart and Others 76 Petawawa 54 Machar 46 Aurora 90 Laurentian Hills 60 Powassan 48 Newmarket 98 Head, Clara and Maria 66 North Himsworth 49 King 71 Nipissing 54 East Gwillimbury 95 Parry Sound, Unorganized, 70 Georgina North East Part 96 Parry Sound, Unorganized, 20 Toronto Division* Centre Part 5 Toronto ∗ Due to confidentiality constraints, the data for some or all of the geographic areas in this Census Division have been combined. See Geographic area amalgamations at the end of each data table for details. ∗ En raison des contraintes qu’impose le respect de la confidentialité, les données relatives à certaines ou toutes les régions géographiques pour cette division de recensement ont été combinées. Pour des renseignements détaillés, voir les Régions géographiques combinées qui apparaissent à la fin de chaque tableau. All Census Consolidated Subdivisions in italics had no farms in 2001. Toutes les subdivisions de recensement unifiées qui n’avaient pas de fermes en 2001 sont indiquées en italiques..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Indigenous Demographics, South East LHIN Calendar Year 2016
    Indigenous Demographics, South East LHIN Calendar Year 2016 Definitions and other methodology notes can be found at the end of this document. Disclaimer: Aboriginal information was obtained from the 2016 Census. In 2016, the long-form questionnaire was re-introduced to Canadians, including residents on Aboriginal Reserves and Settlements.1 While in 2011, when the National Household Survey was administered, there were 36 reserves or settlements that were incompletely enumerated, only 14 reserves were incompletely enumerated in 2016. Fortunately, the Tyendinaga Mohawk Territory in the South East LHIN was not affected in either year. As a measure of data quality, the census provides global non-response rates (GNR) for each geographic area. It combines household and item non-response. The GNR is also used as a main dissemination criterion associated with the quality of the census estimates. For example, the census estimates for any geographic area with a global non-response rate greater than or equal to 50% are not published in the standard products. The estimates for such areas have such a high level of error that they should not be released under most circumstances. In 2011, there were eleven municipalities in the South East LHIN that had global non-response rates greater than 50% and could not be published; however, in 2016, there were no municipalities in the South East LHIN that had rates higher than 50%. Information for all municipalities are available. Aboriginal Identity In 2016, 4.5% of the South East LHIN population reported an Aboriginal identity (i.e. being First Nations, Metis or Inuit and/or being a Registered or Treaty Indian).
    [Show full text]
  • Rank of Pops
    Table 1.3 Basic Pop Trends County by County Census 2001 - place names pop_1996 pop_2001 % diff rank order absolute 1996-01 Sorted by absolute pop growth on growth pop growth - Canada 28,846,761 30,007,094 1,160,333 4.0 - Ontario 10,753,573 11,410,046 656,473 6.1 - York Regional Municipality 1 592,445 729,254 136,809 23.1 - Peel Regional Municipality 2 852,526 988,948 136,422 16.0 - Toronto Division 3 2,385,421 2,481,494 96,073 4.0 - Ottawa Division 4 721,136 774,072 52,936 7.3 - Durham Regional Municipality 5 458,616 506,901 48,285 10.5 - Simcoe County 6 329,865 377,050 47,185 14.3 - Halton Regional Municipality 7 339,875 375,229 35,354 10.4 - Waterloo Regional Municipality 8 405,435 438,515 33,080 8.2 - Essex County 9 350,329 374,975 24,646 7.0 - Hamilton Division 10 467,799 490,268 22,469 4.8 - Wellington County 11 171,406 187,313 15,907 9.3 - Middlesex County 12 389,616 403,185 13,569 3.5 - Niagara Regional Municipality 13 403,504 410,574 7,070 1.8 - Dufferin County 14 45,657 51,013 5,356 11.7 - Brant County 15 114,564 118,485 3,921 3.4 - Northumberland County 16 74,437 77,497 3,060 4.1 - Lanark County 17 59,845 62,495 2,650 4.4 - Muskoka District Municipality 18 50,463 53,106 2,643 5.2 - Prescott and Russell United Counties 19 74,013 76,446 2,433 3.3 - Peterborough County 20 123,448 125,856 2,408 2.0 - Elgin County 21 79,159 81,553 2,394 3.0 - Frontenac County 22 136,365 138,606 2,241 1.6 - Oxford County 23 97,142 99,270 2,128 2.2 - Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 24 102,575 104,670 2,095 2.0 - Perth County 25 72,106 73,675
    [Show full text]
  • Crowe Valley Conservation Authority – Municipal Brief
    Correspondence Meeting – 21 January 2016 Board Members Present • Letters from the Municipality of Marmora and Lake, Faraday Township and Chair - Suzanne Partridge Limerick Township were received for information Municipality of Highlands East Vice- Chair - Ron Gerow Township of Havelock-Belmont- 2015 Financial Statements Methuen John West of McColl Turner Chartered Accountants presented the 2015 Catherine Redden Municipality of Trent Hills Financial Statements to the Board John Taylor The statements are a clean report for 2015 Township of Limerick The Board passed a motion to receive the 20155 financial statements Irene Martin Tudor and Cashel Township Terry Clemens Delegation – Dave Demille Municipality of Marmora and Lake Dave Demille from Templeman Menninga talked to the Board about the weighted voting system for budget approval Robert Ireland Wollaston Township Weighted votes are only used if there is no provincial funding available for Edgar Storms the maintenance and capital portions of the budget Township of Stirling-Rawdon The administration and water operations portion of the budget will be a Emma Kearns one for one vote Township of Faraday Jim O’Shea Corporation of the Township of 2016 Draft Budget North Kawartha There was an intense discussion on using the weighted voting system Staff Members Present Ron Gerow stated if the Board decides to revise the budget format, a legal Tim Pidduck battle is likely to be initiated by his municipality General Manger, CVCA The draft 2016 budget was tabled until the next Board meeting Amanda Donald Recording Secretary, CVCA Sharlene Richardson Regulations Policy Manual Update Regulations Officer, CVCA Sharlene Richardson the changes being made to the policy manual Vicki Woolfrey An appendix titled Environmental Impact Study Terms of Reference and Source Protection Specialist Submission Standards is being added.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Canadian Judicial Council on Jury
    REPORT TO THE CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL ON JURY SELECTION IN ONTARIO June 2018 NOTA: The views expressed in this Report are not necessarily endorsed by the Council and are presented here for discussion purposes only. STUDY LEAVE REPORT Justice Giovanna Toscano Roccamo September 2017 to May 2018 i STUDY LEAVE REPORT Contents 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 2. Background ............................................................................................................................. 2 3. Detailed Summary of Study Leave Objectives and Activities ............................................... 2 A. University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law ............................................................................... 3 (i) New Course & Directed Research Project ........................................................................ 3 (ii) Summaries of Student Papers .......................................................................................... 4 The Conscience of a Community Other Than Our Own: A Métis Critique on the Jury Selection Process in Canada ........................................................................................ 4 Whose Peers Are They Anyway? Examining Juror Ineligibility in Canada .......................... 4 Addressing Indigenous Underrepresentation on Juries: Challenging the Ontario Juries Act ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Council Meeting Agenda
    Page 1 of 105 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Audio Broadcast to Township's Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/SouthFrontenacTwp TIME: 7:00 PM, DATE: Tuesday, December 15, 2020 PLACE: Electronic Participation/Council Chambers. 1. Call to Order/Roll Call a) Resolution 2. Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof 3. Approval of Agenda a) Resolution 4. Announcements/Statements by Councillors - Christmas Greetings 5. Scheduled Closed Session (at the end of the meeting) 6. Recess - not applicable 7. Delegations - not applicable 8. Public Meeting - not applicable 9. Approval of Minutes a) November 10, 2020 Committee of the Whole Meeting (5:00 pm) 4 - 9 b) November 10, 2020 Special Committee of the Whole Meeting (7:00 10 - 11 pm) 10. Business Arising from the Minutes a) By-law 2020-54 - Open Air Burning By-law - Reconsideration 12 - 23 11. Reports Requiring Action a) 2020 Frontenac Community Arena Levy 24 b) Frontenac Community Arena - Loan Extension 25 c) Agreement between the Frontenac Townships for the Delivery of 26 - 40 Part 8 (On-site Sewage System) Services Page 2 of 105 d) Zoning By-law Amendment - Z-20-09 - Barry and Susan Johnston, 41 - 42 Part Lot 7, Concession 11 (Portland) Silver Rock Lane - See By-law 2020-72 e) Zoning By-law Amendment - Z-20-10 - Duncan and Mary Southall, 43 - 44 3708 Stage Coach Road (Loughborough) - See By-law 2020-73 f) Agreement to Encroach on a Township Road Allowance - 45 - 47 Concession 8, Part Lot 1 (Portland) - See By-law 2020-74 g) Hinchinbrooke Road Reconstruction - Land Purchase - See By-law 48 - 53 2020-75 h) Road Closing Application - RC-20-03 - Part of Rideau Crescent 54 - 58 adjoining Lots 16-20 on Plan 1316 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Safety & Well-Being Plan
    June 2021 Community Safety & Well-Being Plan Townships of Central Frontenac, North Frontenac, South Frontenac and Frontenac Islands Jane Torrance Stephanie Gray Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction to Community Safety and Well-being 6 1.2 Environmental Scan 7 1.3 Objectives 12 1.4 Approach and Methodology 13 2. Risks to Community Safety and Well-Being 15 2.1 Rural Economic and Community Development 15 Poverty 16 Income 17 Employment 20 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 23 Housing and Homelessness 26 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 30 Transportation 32 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 34 First Nations Indigenous Culture 35 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 37 Rural Community Development 38 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 40 2.2 Health, Mental Health and Substance Use 40 Health 41 Youth 42 Seniors 45 Special Needs/Services 45 Primary Care 46 Substance Use and Mental Health 46 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 51 2.3 Violence Against Persons (physical, emotional, sexual, domestic) 56 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 60 3. Outcomes and Actions and Implementation 63 References 66 Appendix 1 – Draft Implementation Plan 69 CSWB – Frontenac North, Central, South, Islands 2 Executive Summary The Townships of Central Frontenac, North Frontenac, South Frontenac and Frontenac Islands have been working with their community partners since October of 2019 to develop a Community Safety and Well-being Plan, as mandated by legislation under the Police Services Act. More than 80 individuals, groups, organisations and agencies have been consulted in this process. The Ministry of Solicitor General has provided a framework to help municipalities undertaking the community safety and well-being planning process.
    [Show full text]
  • Population, Housing and Employment Projections Study County of Frontenac ______
    Population, Housing and Employment Projections Study County of Frontenac ________________________ Final Report Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 905-272-3600 January 20, 2020 [email protected] Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... i 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Terms of Reference ................................................................................ 1-1 2. Approach .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 What Drives Population Growth .............................................................. 2-1 2.2 Long-term Permanent Population and Housing Forecast Approach ....... 2-5 3. Overview of Macro-Economic Employment and Demographic Trends ...... 3-1 3.1 Ontario Economic Outlook within the Canadian Context ........................ 3-1 3.1.1 Outlook for Ontario’s Manufacturing Sector ............................... 3-2 3.2 Regional Economic Trends ..................................................................... 3-3 3.2.1 Regional Labour Force Trends, Kingston C.M.A., 2001 to 2016 ........................................................................................... 3-3 3.2.2 Frontenac County Economic Trends .......................................... 3-5 3.3 Observations ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UN the UNCITRAL ARBITRATION B 11 JM LONGYEAR, LLC Claimant
    UN THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION B 11 J. M. LONGYEAR, LLC Claimant/ Investor V. GOVERNMENT OF CANADA ("CANADA") Party REDACTED REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION Pursuant to Article 1117 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), JM Longyear, LLC, (the "Investor") submits this request for arbitration under the UNCITRAL Rules of Arbitration (Resolution 31/98 Adopted by the General Assembly on 15 December 1976) on behalf of J.M. LongyearCanada, ULC (the "Enterprise"). A. DEMAND THAT THE DISPUTE BE REFERRED TO ARBITRATION Pursuant 1 11 written notice the intention submit a claim to 14, more 2 B. NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF THE PARTIES INVESTOR: J. M. LONGYEAR, LLC 210 N. FRONT 1ST MARQU Ml49855 ENTERPRISE: J.M. LONGYEAR CANADA, ULC 2401 TD TOWER, 10088 102 UE, EDMONTON ALBERT A, RESPONDENT: GOVERNMENT OF CANADA Office of the Deputy Attorney General of Canada Justice Building 239 Wellington Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A OH8 address for service of the Investor and Enterprise is: Charles M. Gastle BENN GASTLE P.C. Barristers and Solicitors 27 Old Kingston Road Toronto, Ontario M 1E 3J6 PH: (4 16) 36 1-3319 Ext. 222 FX: (416) 361-1530 cgastle@bennettgastle .em Mr. Gordon Acton Mr. Steven Shoemaker 3 and: Todd Weiler Barrister & Solicitor # 19- 14 Valleyrun Blvd. London, ON N6G 5N8 Canada PH: {202) 684-6840 FX: (877) 887-7840 todd@treatylaw .com C. THE GENERAL NATURE OF THE CLAIM AND AN INDICATION OF THE AMOUNT INVOLVED The Government of Ontario has engaged, and continues to engage, in conduct inconsistent with the following provisions of NAFT A Chapter 11: (i) Article 1102, National Treatment; and (ii).
    [Show full text]
  • Community Safety and Well-Being Report
    June 2021 Community Safety & Well-Being Plan Townships of Central Frontenac, North Frontenac, South Frontenac and Frontenac Islands Jane Torrance Stephanie Gray Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction to Community Safety and Well-being 6 1.2 Environmental Scan 7 1.3 Objectives 12 1.4 Approach and Methodology 13 2. Risks to Community Safety and Well-Being 15 2.1 Rural Economic and Community Development 15 Poverty 16 Income 17 Employment 20 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 23 Housing and Homelessness 26 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 30 Transportation 32 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 34 First Nations Indigenous Culture 35 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 37 Rural Community Development 38 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 40 2.2 Health, Mental Health and Substance Use 40 Health 41 Youth 42 Seniors 45 Special Needs/Services 45 Primary Care 46 Substance Use and Mental Health 46 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 51 2.3 Violence Against Persons (physical, emotional, sexual, domestic) 56 Strategies to Mitigate the Risk 60 3. Outcomes and Actions and Implementation 63 References 66 Appendix 1 – Draft Implementation Plan 69 CSWB – Frontenac North, Central, South, Islands 2 Executive Summary The Townships of Central Frontenac, North Frontenac, South Frontenac and Frontenac Islands have been working with their community partners since October of 2019 to develop a Community Safety and Well-being Plan, as mandated by legislation under the Police Services Act. More than 80 individuals, groups, organisations and agencies have been consulted in this process. The Ministry of Solicitor General has provided a framework to help municipalities undertaking the community safety and well-being planning process.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of a Regular Meeting of Council for the Corporation of The
    Minutes of a Regular Meeting of Council for The Corporation of the Township of North Frontenac, held July 5, 2019 in the Council Chambers, 6648 Road 506, Plevna, Ontario. Present: Mayor Ron Higgins; Deputy Mayor Fred Perry and Councillor Wayne Good – Ward 1; Councillor Vernon Hermer and Councillor Gerry Martin – Ward 2; and Councillor John Inglis and Councillor Fred Fowler – Ward 3. Also Present: Tara Mieske, Clerk/ Planning Manager; Corey Klatt, Manager of Community Development/CAO Back-up (MCD); Eric Korhonen, Director of Emergency Services/Fire Chief (DESFC); and Brooke Drechsler, Deputy Clerk/Assistant to the Planning Manager. 1. Call To Order The Mayor called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. 2. Approval of Agenda Moved by Councillor Hermer, Seconded by Councillor Martin #376-19 Be It Resolved That Council approves the Agenda for the Regular Meeting of Council dated July 5, 2019, as circulated. Carried 3. Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof None declared. 4. Business Introductions None. 5. Presentations a) Debra Murphy, CIP, Regional Manager, for Frank Cowan – Receipt of Spring 2019 Home Town Initiative from Frank Cowan Company and Cowan Foundation. Moved by Councillor Martin, Seconded by Councillor Hermer #377-19 Be It Resolved That Council receives for information the presentation from Debra Murphy, CIP, Regional Manager, Frank Cowan and Megan Schooley, Arthur J. Gallagher Canada Limited regarding receipt of a $5000 donation for the painting of the interior of the Barrie Community Hall through the Spring 2019 Home Town Initiative from Frank Cowan Company and Cowan Foundation and thanks them for their time spent today.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 County of Hastings Community and Human Services Department
    County of Hastings www.hastingscounty.com Community and Human Services Department Housing Services 228 Church Street, Belleville, ON K8N 5E2 1 Phone: 613-966-1311 Message from the Warden, Rick Phillips The 5 year Housing Homelessness Plan has served as a guiding document to plan for and address the need for affordable housing, and this update will ensure that Hastings County remains strategically focused on the addressing the need for affordable housing. It is our commitment to continue to advocate to senior levels of government for optimum levels of funding, as well continue to work with our community partners to develop innovative strategies to secure, maintain, and support those who require housing in our communities. Supporting People and our Communities remains the focus of our work at Hastings County, and this Plan helps to ensure that we continue to work towards providing this basic life support for our residents. Conclusion _____56-57 References___________________________________58 Table of Contents Appendices Message from Community & Human Services Director_ _ 3 A: Municipality Consultations____________ _59-71 Introduction ____________ 4-6 B: Low Income Cut-Offs__________________ __72 C: Core Housing Need by Methodology for the 5-Year Review __ 7-8 Municipality and Across Canada 73-74 Needs Assessment and Data Review D: Housing Profiles by Municipality__________ City of Belleville CMA_____________ 75 Population and Age 9-10 City of Belleville (only)_____________76 Income and Housing Affordability_ _11-16 City of Quinte West_______________77
    [Show full text]
  • OPP-Quinte-West
    4.1(b)-(h) Police Services Belleville Police Service 8 Wing Military Police Squadron Ontario Provincial Police Bancroft Ontario Provincial Police Central Hastings Ontario Provincial Police Prince Edward County Ontario Provincial Police Quinte West Stirling-Rawdon Police Service Purpose: To ensure that there are standardized procedures and a process in place for undertaking and managing police investigations into domestic violence and sexual violence occurrences. Commitment: This agreement involves the Bancroft, Central Hastings, Prince Edward County, and Quinte West detachments of the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP), Belleville Police Service, 8 Wing Military Police Squadron and the Stirling- Rawdon Police Service. These police services are members of the Quinte Coordinating Committee Against Violence (QCCAV). All police services will investigate incidents of domestic and sexual violence. They will provide support to victims through a coordinated community response with victim service agencies. In accordance with the Provincial Adequacy Standards, the police services will work in partnership with the appropriate community agencies and service providers to establish a domestic violence review committee to manage high risk individuals. The police services will, within the mandate of our services, be inclusive and provide equal treatment for all people accessing our service, while being sensitive to issues related to race, culture, ethnicity, religion, language, gender, age, sexual orientation, socio-economic status and/or abilities of individuals. The police services will respond to all calls for a domestic incident including those received from third party that may or may not identify themselves. The police services will also respond if the call is disconnected or the caller indicates that the police are no longer required.
    [Show full text]