Regu-Mate® (Altrenogest) Management Practices and Potential for Exposure in Equine Care Givers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regu-Mate® (Altrenogest) Management Practices and Potential for Exposure in Equine Care Givers Regu-Mate® (altrenogest) Management Practices and Potential for Exposure in Equine Care Givers A thesis submitted by Ariel Newman In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering TUFTS UNIVERSITY August 2013 Advisers: Anne Marie C. Desmarais, Mark Woodin and Brett Gaby DVM ABSTRACT Regu-Mate, the synthetic progesterone altrenogest, is used to control estrus in horses. Equine caregivers handling Regu-Mate may be exposed through accidental exposure or inadequate safety procedures. This exposure can result in adverse health effects including menstrual cycle changes, uterine/abdominal cramping, headaches and prolonged pregnancy. Surveys asked equine caregivers about Regu-Mate handling procedures, skin exposure to the drug, symptoms associated with exposure to the drug, and general background information. I analyzed results through descriptive statistics. Most respondents do not take sufficient safety precautions when handling Regu-Mate. Respondents most commonly use rubber/latex gloves or do not wear gloves when handling the drug and/or use a non-locking syringe to withdraw the medication. Respondents become complacent, taking fewer precautions the longer and more often they handle Regu-Mate. I developed a risk communication program that outlines the important safe handling discussion topics between veterinarians and clients and recommends a periodic check- in to evaluate a facility’s procedures. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my sincerest gratitude to Anne Marie Desmarais, Mark Woodin and Brett Gaby their wisdom and guidance through this project. Thank you to Karen Vagts for helping navigate the research process. This thesis was made possible by the veterinarians and practices that assisted in the dissemination of my survey: Anoka Equine Veterinary Services, Atlanta Equine Clinic, Battenkill Equine Clinic, Brandywine Equine Veterinary Associates, Cave Creek Equine, Clover Valley Veterinary Services, Eastampton Veterinary Service, El Sol Equine Practice, Equine Reproduction, Equine Reproduction Concepts, Equine Veterinary Services of Leelanau, Essex Equine, Dr. Tera Forbeck DVM, Fox Run Equine Center, Gas Light Equine, Dr. Carlos Gradil DVM, Dr. Paul E. Mennick DVM, Mobile Veterinary Practice, Montana Equine, Ocean State Equine, Pacific Crest Sporthorse, Panhandle Veterinary Services, Piedmont Equine Practice and Hospital, Professional Equine Therapeutics Service, Rutherford Large Animal Services, Santa Sofia Equine, South Shore Equine, Tacoma Equine Hospital, Teigland Franklin and Brokken DVM’s PA and Dr. Karen Wolfsdorf DVM. A special thank you to my family: Mom, Dad and Maris for their never-ending support in every way possible, Brady and Kaylee for “understanding” that the boring computer work truly was more important than a walk in the woods, and Ethan for his constant encouragement. You are all wonderful; thank you for being with me every step along this journey. iii Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Problem Statement .......................................................................................................... 3 2 Background ............................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Chemical Information ....................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Pharmakinetics in Horses ................................................................................................. 5 2.2.1 Testing ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Health Effects in Horses ................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Health Effects in Humans ................................................................................................. 7 2.4.1 Non-Carcinogenic Effects .......................................................................................... 7 2.4.2 Carcinogenic Effects .................................................................................................. 8 2.4.3 Sensitive Populations ................................................................................................ 8 2.4.4 Adverse Drug Experience Reports ............................................................................ 8 2.5 Levels of Human Exposure ............................................................................................. 10 2.6 Effects on Plant Life and Soils ........................................................................................ 12 2.7 Routes of Exposure for Humans .................................................................................... 13 2.8 Horse Physiology and the Estrous Cycle ........................................................................ 14 2.9 Altrenogest Usage in Horses and Alternatives............................................................... 15 2.9.1 Behavior Modification ............................................................................................ 16 2.9.2 Breeding Mares ....................................................................................................... 18 2.9.3 Maintaining Pregnancy ........................................................................................... 19 2.10 Administering Altrenogest ............................................................................................. 19 2.10.1 Manufacturer’s Recommendations ........................................................................ 20 2.10.2 Handling Guidelines ................................................................................................ 20 2.10.3 Safety of Recommendations ................................................................................... 21 3 Methods ................................................................................................................................ 27 3.1 Survey Design ................................................................................................................. 27 3.1.1 Languages ............................................................................................................... 27 3.1.2 Participants ............................................................................................................. 27 3.1.3 Institutional Review Board Approval ...................................................................... 28 3.2 Veterinary Professional Recruitment and Survey Distribution ...................................... 28 3.3 Data Entry ....................................................................................................................... 29 3.4 Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 30 3.5 Literature Search ............................................................................................................ 30 iv Table of Contents (continued) 4 Results ................................................................................................................................... 32 4.1 Survey Questions............................................................................................................ 32 4.1.1 Basic Demographics ................................................................................................ 32 4.1.2 Questions about Regu-Mate Interaction ................................................................ 36 4.1.3 Exposure and Symptoms ........................................................................................ 42 4.1.4 Education, learning and restrictions ....................................................................... 44 4.2 Comparisons between Questions .................................................................................. 46 4.1.5 Demographic Comparisons ..................................................................................... 46 4.1.6 Relationship with Horses Comparisons .................................................................. 54 4.1.7 Breeding Industry Comparisons .............................................................................. 68 4.1.8 Reasons for Using Regu-Mate ................................................................................ 76 4.1.9 Number of Horses Comparisons ............................................................................. 78 4.1.10 Years Handling Comparisons .................................................................................. 84 4.1.11 Frequency handling Regu-Mate.............................................................................. 91 4.1.12 Preventative Measures ........................................................................................... 96 4.1.13 Where Respondents Learned About Regu-Mate ................................................. 106 4.1.14 Regu-Mate Education from Veterinarians ............................................................ 112 4.1.15 Reported Symptoms ............................................................................................. 117 4.3 Unable to Compare ...................................................................................................... 121 5 Discussion...........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • New Rules Pertaining to the Banning of Anabolic Steroids in the Western Australian Harness Racing Industry to Be Introduced 1St September 2014
    NEW RULES PERTAINING TO THE BANNING OF ANABOLIC STEROIDS IN THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN HARNESS RACING INDUSTRY TO BE INTRODUCED 1ST SEPTEMBER 2014 Notice is hereby given that the Board of Racing and Wagering WA have resolved that the RWWA Rules of Harness Racing 2004 be amended. In accordance with section 45 (1) (b) of the Racing and Wagering Western Australia Act 2003 the Board of Racing and Wagering WA on the 10th April 2014 resolved that these amendments be adopted accordingly into the RWWA Rules of Harness Racing. The Harness Racing Board had advised of these amendments and the RWWA Board has determined that these amendments will come into effect on 1st September 2014. The details of the relevant rules pertaining to this ban of anabolic steroids for reference can be found following this advice. There are many implications arising from the introduction of these rules, and to assist trainers and veterinarians to comply with the new rules the following explanatory statement has been prepared. Which steroids are banned under these rules? The new rules ban the use of "anabolic androgenic steroids" in Standardbred horses at any time from birth until retirement. "Anabolic androgenic steroids" include those that are currently registered in Australia by the APVMA for use in horses, such as boldenone, ethylestrenol (in Nitrotain), methandriol, nandrolone, stanozolol and testosterone. Exogenous anabolic androgenic steroids that are banned also include but are not limited to those listed in the WADA prohibited list, such as 1-androstenediol; 1-androstenedione;
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Name Plate Number Well Location % Inhibition, Screen Axitinib 1 1 20 Gefitinib (ZD1839) 1 2 70 Sorafenib Tosylate 1 3 21 Cr
    Drug Name Plate Number Well Location % Inhibition, Screen Axitinib 1 1 20 Gefitinib (ZD1839) 1 2 70 Sorafenib Tosylate 1 3 21 Crizotinib (PF-02341066) 1 4 55 Docetaxel 1 5 98 Anastrozole 1 6 25 Cladribine 1 7 23 Methotrexate 1 8 -187 Letrozole 1 9 65 Entecavir Hydrate 1 10 48 Roxadustat (FG-4592) 1 11 19 Imatinib Mesylate (STI571) 1 12 0 Sunitinib Malate 1 13 34 Vismodegib (GDC-0449) 1 14 64 Paclitaxel 1 15 89 Aprepitant 1 16 94 Decitabine 1 17 -79 Bendamustine HCl 1 18 19 Temozolomide 1 19 -111 Nepafenac 1 20 24 Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) 1 21 -43 Lapatinib (GW-572016) Ditosylate 1 22 88 Temsirolimus (CCI-779, NSC 683864) 1 23 96 Belinostat (PXD101) 1 24 46 Capecitabine 1 25 19 Bicalutamide 1 26 83 Dutasteride 1 27 68 Epirubicin HCl 1 28 -59 Tamoxifen 1 29 30 Rufinamide 1 30 96 Afatinib (BIBW2992) 1 31 -54 Lenalidomide (CC-5013) 1 32 19 Vorinostat (SAHA, MK0683) 1 33 38 Rucaparib (AG-014699,PF-01367338) phosphate1 34 14 Lenvatinib (E7080) 1 35 80 Fulvestrant 1 36 76 Melatonin 1 37 15 Etoposide 1 38 -69 Vincristine sulfate 1 39 61 Posaconazole 1 40 97 Bortezomib (PS-341) 1 41 71 Panobinostat (LBH589) 1 42 41 Entinostat (MS-275) 1 43 26 Cabozantinib (XL184, BMS-907351) 1 44 79 Valproic acid sodium salt (Sodium valproate) 1 45 7 Raltitrexed 1 46 39 Bisoprolol fumarate 1 47 -23 Raloxifene HCl 1 48 97 Agomelatine 1 49 35 Prasugrel 1 50 -24 Bosutinib (SKI-606) 1 51 85 Nilotinib (AMN-107) 1 52 99 Enzastaurin (LY317615) 1 53 -12 Everolimus (RAD001) 1 54 94 Regorafenib (BAY 73-4506) 1 55 24 Thalidomide 1 56 40 Tivozanib (AV-951) 1 57 86 Fludarabine
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceuticals Appendix
    )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 3 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. Product CAS No. Product CAS No. ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ADAPALENE 106685-40-9 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ADAPROLOL 101479-70-3 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ADEMETIONINE 17176-17-9 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE 61-19-8 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ADIBENDAN 100510-33-6 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ADICILLIN 525-94-0 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9 ADIMOLOL 78459-19-5 ACAPRAZINE 55485-20-6 ADINAZOLAM 37115-32-5 ACARBOSE 56180-94-0 ADIPHENINE 64-95-9 ACEBROCHOL 514-50-1 ADIPIODONE 606-17-7 ACEBURIC ACID 26976-72-7 ADITEREN 56066-19-4 ACEBUTOLOL 37517-30-9 ADITOPRIME 56066-63-8 ACECAINIDE 32795-44-1 ADOSOPINE 88124-26-9 ACECARBROMAL 77-66-7 ADOZELESIN 110314-48-2 ACECLIDINE 827-61-2 ADRAFINIL 63547-13-7 ACECLOFENAC 89796-99-6 ADRENALONE 99-45-6 ACEDAPSONE 77-46-3 AFALANINE 2901-75-9 ACEDIASULFONE SODIUM 127-60-6 AFLOQUALONE 56287-74-2 ACEDOBEN 556-08-1 AFUROLOL 65776-67-2 ACEFLURANOL 80595-73-9 AGANODINE 86696-87-9 ACEFURTIAMINE 10072-48-7 AKLOMIDE 3011-89-0 ACEFYLLINE CLOFIBROL 70788-27-1
    [Show full text]
  • (Anti-)Androgenic Activities in Aquatic Environments?
    Environmental Pollution 242 (2018) 417e425 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Environmental Pollution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envpol Do progestins contribute to (anti-)androgenic activities in aquatic environments?* * Pavel Sauer , Adam Borík, Oksana Golovko, Roman Grabic, Andrea Vojs Stanov a, Olga Valentova, Alzbeta Stara, Marie Sandova, Hana Kocour Kroupova University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrocenoses, Zati sí 728/II, 389 25 Vodnany, Czech Republic article info abstract Article history: Unknown compounds with (anti-)androgenic activities enter the aquatic environment via municipal Received 21 May 2018 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Progestins are well-known environmental contaminants capable Received in revised form of interfering with androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathway. The aim of the present study was to 28 June 2018 determine if 15 selected progestins have potential to contribute to (anti-)androgenic activities in Accepted 30 June 2018 municipal wastewaters and the respective recipient surface waters. AR-specific Chemically Activated Available online 4 July 2018 LUciferase gene eXpression bioassay in agonistic (AR-CALUX) and antagonistic (anti-AR-CALUX) modes and liquid chromatography tandem atmospheric pressure chemical ionization/atmospheric photoioni- Keywords: Progestagens zation with hybrid quadrupole/orbital trap mass spectrometry operated in high resolution product scan Solid-phase extraction mode (LC-APCI/APPI-HRPS) methods were used to assess (anti-)androgenic activity and to detect the Target analysis target compounds, respectively. The contribution of progestins to (anti-)androgenic activities was Sample acidification evaluated by means of a biologically and chemically derived toxicity equivalent approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Depo-Provera Medroxyprogesterone
    DEPO-PROVERA® (MEDROXYPROGESTERONE) – Does this Medication Block Estrus in Mares? Patrick M. McCue DVM, PhD, Diplomate American College of Theriogenologists Horse owners, trainers, and veterinarians are mg of medroxyprogesterone as an intra- all looking for easy, inexpensive, and muscular injection, and then received 400 effective methods to block behavioral estrus mg once per week for an additional 5 weeks. in performance mares. Some mares are more This dose and treatment frequency were difficult to train or exhibit performance issues purposely chosen to be even higher that when in heat. A number of medications and commonly used in mares to suppress estrus. management strategies have been used over the years to prevent estrus in mares. This The goal was to compare the effect of article is the first in a series on the efficacy of medroxyprogesterone with that of a placebo medications or techniques used in mares to treatment, which should not alter the estrous suppress heat. cycle, and altrenogest, a medication known to suppress estrus. Depo-Provera® is the brand name of the synthetic progestin hormone medroxy- Mares were teased individually once per day progesterone. Depo-Provera® is used in by a stallion and the response recorded. human medicine as a method of birth control. Ultrasound examinations were performed Medroxyprogesterone has been administered three times per week and then daily when a to performance mares with the intention of follicle greater than 35 mm in diameter was blocking behavioral estrus. detected. The size of the pre-ovulatory follicle and day of ovulation was noted. In A controlled study was recently performed addition, blood samples were collected for to test the efficacy of medroxyprogesterone analysis of luteinizing hormone (LH) and in suppressing estrus in mares.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutical Appendix to the Tariff Schedule 2
    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2006) – Supplement 1 (Rev. 1) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2006) – Supplement 1 (Rev. 1) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. Product CAS No. Product CAS No. ABACAVIR 136470-78-5 ACEXAMIC ACID 57-08-9 ABAFUNGIN 129639-79-8 ACICLOVIR 59277-89-3 ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACIFRAN 72420-38-3 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ACIPIMOX 51037-30-0 ABARELIX 183552-38-7 ACITAZANOLAST 114607-46-4 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ACITEMATE 101197-99-3 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ACITRETIN 55079-83-9 ABIRATERONE 154229-19-3 ACIVICIN 42228-92-2 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ACLANTATE 39633-62-0 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ACLARUBICIN 57576-44-0 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ACLATONIUM NAPADISILATE 55077-30-0 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ACODAZOLE 79152-85-5 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9 ACONIAZIDE 13410-86-1 ACAPRAZINE 55485-20-6 ACOXATRINE 748-44-7 ACARBOSE 56180-94-0 ACREOZAST 123548-56-1 ACEBROCHOL 514-50-1 ACRIDOREX 47487-22-9 ACEBURIC
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutical Appendix to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Basic Revision 3 (2021) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Basic Revision 3 (2021) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names INN which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service CAS registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known.
    [Show full text]
  • AMRI India Pvt
    WE’VE GOT API DEVELOPMENT AND MANUFACTURING DOWN TO AN EXACT SCIENCE API Commercial Product Catalogue PRODUCT CATALOGUE API Commercial US EU Japan US EU Japan API Name Site CEP India China API Name Site CEP India China DMF DMF DMF DMF DMF DMF Rozzano Quinto de Adenosine Betaine Citrate Anhydrous Bon Encontre, France A Stampi, Italy • Betametasone-17,21- Alcaftadine Valladolid, Spain Valladolid, Spain • Dipropionate Sterile • Alclometasone-17,21- Valladolid, Spain Betamethasone Acetate Valladolid, Spain Dipropionate • • • Altrenogest Valladolid, Spain • • Betamethasone Base Valladolid, Spain Aminobisamide HCl Rensselaer, US Betamethasone Benzoate Valladolid, Spain Amphetamine Aspartate Betamethasone Valerate Rensselaer, US Valladolid, Spain Monohydrate Milled • Acetate Betamethasone-17,21- Amphetamine Sulfate Rensselaer, US Valladolid, Spain • Dipropionate • • • • Rozzano Quinto de Argatroban Betamethasone-17-Valerate Valladolid, Spain Stampi, Italy • • • • Betamethasone-21- Atenolol Aurangabad, India Valladolid, Spain • • • Phosphate Disodium Salt • • Rozzano Quinto de Bromfenac Monosodium Atracurium Besylate Lodi, Italy Stampi, Italy • Salt Sesquihydrate • • Rozzano Quinto de Atropine Sulfate Grafton, US Bromocriptine Mesylate • Stampi, Italy • • • Rozzano Quinto de Azelastine HCl Budesonide Valladolid, Spain Stampi, Italy • • • • • Rozzano Valleambrosia, Aztreonam (not sterile) Budesonide Sterile Valladolid, Spain Italy • • • • B Bamifylline HCl Bon Encontre, France • C Capecitabine Lodi, Italy • • Beclomethasone-17,21- Valladolid, Spain
    [Show full text]
  • Residues of Medroxyprogesterone Acetate Detected in Sows at A
    This article was downloaded by: [Cirad-Dist Bib Lavalette] On: 22 November 2013, At: 10:04 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tfac20 Residues of medroxyprogesterone acetate detected in sows at a slaughterhouse, Madagascar Vincent Porphyrea, Michel Rakotoharinomeb, Tantely Randriamparanyc, Damien Pognona, Stéphanie Prévostd & Bruno Le Bizecd a Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement – CIRAD, Réunion, France b Direction of Veterinary Services, Ministry of Livestock Production, Antananarivo, Madagascar c National Laboratory of Veterinary Diagnostic, Antananarivo, Madagascar d Laboratoire d’Etude des Résidus et Contaminants dans les Aliments (LABERCA), Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire, Agroalimentaire et de l’Alimentation Nantes Atlantique (ONIRIS), Nantes, France Accepted author version posted online: 24 Sep 2013.Published online: 20 Nov 2013. To cite this article: Vincent Porphyre, Michel Rakotoharinome, Tantely Randriamparany, Damien Pognon, Stéphanie Prévost & Bruno Le Bizec , Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A (2013): Residues of medroxyprogesterone acetate detected in sows at a slaughterhouse, Madagascar, Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2013.848293 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2013.848293 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • Stembook 2018.Pdf
    The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances FORMER DOCUMENT NUMBER: WHO/PHARM S/NOM 15 WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1 © World Health Organization 2018 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 (WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCI Uniform Classification Guidelines for Foreign Substances, Or Similar State Regulatory Guidelines, Shall Be Assigned Points As Follows
    DRUG TESTING STANDARDS AND PRACTICES PROGRAM. Uniform Classification Guidelines for Foreign Substances And Recommended Penalties Model Rule. January, 2019 (V.14.0) © ASSOCIATION OF RACING COMMISSIONERS INTERNATIONAL – 2019. Association of Racing Commissioners International 2365 Harrodsburg Road- B450 Lexington, Kentucky, USA www.arci.com Page 1 of 66 Preamble to the Uniform Classification Guidelines of Foreign Substances The Preamble to the Uniform Classification Guidelines was approved by the RCI Drug Testing and Quality Assurance Program Committee (now the Drug Testing Standards and Practices Program Committee) on August 26, 1991. Minor revisions to the Preamble were made by the Drug Classification subcommittee (now the Veterinary Pharmacologists Subcommittee) on September 3, 1991. "The Uniform Classification Guidelines printed on the following pages are intended to assist stewards, hearing officers and racing commissioners in evaluating the seriousness of alleged violations of medication and prohibited substance rules in racing jurisdictions. Practicing equine veterinarians, state veterinarians, and equine pharmacologists are available and should be consulted to explain the pharmacological effects of the drugs listed in each class prior to any decisions with respect to penalities to be imposed. The ranking of drugs is based on their pharmacology, their ability to influence the outcome of a race, whether or not they have legitimate therapeutic uses in the racing horse, or other evidence that they may be used improperly. These classes of drugs are intended only as guidelines and should be employed only to assist persons adjudicating facts and opinions in understanding the seriousness of the alleged offenses. The facts of each case are always different and there may be mitigating circumstances which should always be considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Randlabspring 2018 Newsletter Spring 2018 Newsletter
    RANDLABSPRING 2018 NEWSLETTER SPRING 2018 NEWSLETTER ALTRENOGEST has been used in performance fillies and mares for over 20 years. So why is its use now being restricted? In no mood to work. Mares behaving badly. Randlab’s Global Technical Veterinarian, Dr Michael Robinson, presents the facts behind the current Altrenogest debate KEY POINTS Altrenogest is still able to be used in performance mares that are: · Racing in NSW (oral only and not within one clear day of racing). · Not competing in official Equestrian Australia/FEI events · Non-competition fillies and mares · Pleasure/recreational fillies and mares · Breeding mares Under the Australian Rules of Racing and FEI Clean Sport For Horses Regulations, it is illegal to use Altrenogest in male horses. Altrenogest injection delivers a peak concentration that is approximately seven times that achieved by daily oral administration of Altrenogest. All current formulations of Altrenogest contain a low level of background impurities including trenbolone and trendione. The higher peaks obtained with Altrenogest injection may also result in higher peaks of any impurities and may lead to a positive swab. Altrenogest injections maintain plasma levels above those of daily oral Altrenogest for a period of 5-7 days following injection. This may be compounded by repeated weekly injections which results in plasma levels that are sustained for longer. Nothing has changed with the oral formulations of Altrenogest as there was one clear day between administration and racing (ie Thursday for over 20 years. However, its use has recently been brought administration for a Saturday race). into question by racing authorities. So why the change? Racing NSW continues to allow the use of oral Altrenogest up until one clear As most veterinarians are now aware, Racing Victoria issued a notice on 19 day from racing.
    [Show full text]