DOCSLIB.ORG

In Plane View:A Clear Vision for the Future

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In Plane View:A Clear Vision for the Future IN PLANE VIEW: A CLEAR VISION FOR THE FUTURE City of Valparaiso | Porter County | Porter County Regional Airport DRAFT DOCUMENT 01.07.13 Appendix ‘A’ PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SQUARE FOOTAGES PORTER COUNTY AIRPORT ZONE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE 30 Year Plan 100 Year Plan Square Area Size Percentage Projected Building Site Building Hardscape Open Space Land Use Feet per Total Units Type (Acreage) of land use Jobs (SF) acreage (SF) (SF) (SF) Worker Development Zone 1 1 Residential 129.3 129 Assumes 1 unit per 1 acres 2 Light Industrial 47.7 623,344 727,234.20 727,234.20 3 Commercial, Retail 125 0.74 2,434 500 1,216,853 140 1,361,250 1,905,750.00 2,178,000.00 4 Business Park 189.9 0.54 2,228 250 557,073 51 2,068,011 2,895,215.40 3,308,817.60 5 Residential 14.4 12 Assumes 1 unit per .5 acres 6 Business Park 140.9 0.40 1,653 250 413,331 38 1,534,401 2,148,161.40 2,455,041.60 7 Residential 86.1 107 Assumes 1 unit per .5 acres 8 Commercial, Retail 44.7 0.26 870 500 435,147 50 486,783 681,496.20 778,852.80 9 Business Park 230.6 2,511,234 3,515,727.60 4,017,974.40 Development Zone 2 1 Institutional 67.3 2 Business Park 21.9 238,491 238,491.00 381,585.60 3 Commercial, Retail 35.4 385,506 539,708.40 616,809.60 4 Commercial, Retail 96.7 1,053,063 1,474,288.20 1,684,900.80 5 Open Space 189.3 6 Residential 50.8 100 Assumes 1 unit per .5 acres Development Zone 3 1 Light Industrial 607.4 0.41 1,117 750 837,413 64 7,937,503 9,260,420.40 9,260,420.40 2 Open Space 40.5 3 Residential 51.3 102 Assumes 1 unit per .5 acres 4 Institutional 76.9 Fairgrounds 5 Agriculture 82.3 8 Assumes 1 unit per 10 acres 6 Institutional 20.7 135,709 Jail 7 Light Industrial 27.5 0.02 51 750 37,914 3 359,370 419,265.00 419,265.00 Appendix DRAFT: DOCUMENT APPENDIX PORTER COUNTY AIRPORT ZONE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE 30 Year Plan 100 Year Plan Square Area Size Percentage Projected Building Site Building Hardscape Open Space Land Use Feet per Total Units Type (Acreage) of land use Jobs (SF) acreage (SF) (SF) (SF) Worker Development Zone 4 1 Heavy Industrial 654.1 1,303 1,500 1,954,500 128 9,972,409 11,397,038.40 9,972,408.60 Development Zone 5 1 Aviation 1181.7 Development Zone 6 1 Business Park 18.1 0.05 212 250 53,096 5 197,109 275,952.60 315,374.40 Multi-family Assumes 1 unit per 4,000 SF (.091 2 35.8 300 Residential Acres) 3 Light Industrial 362.8 0.24 667 750 500,187 38 4,741,070 5,531,248.80 5,531,248.80 4 Residential 40.4 4 Assumes 1 unit per 10 acres Development Zone 7 1 Medium Industrial 488.5 0.33 898 1,000 897,983 64 7,447,671 8,511,624.00 7,447,671.00 Development Zone 8 1 Residential 40.26 80 Assumes 1 unit per .5 acres 2 Agriculture 1222.1 122 Assumes 1 unit per 10 acres Conservation 3 853 42 Assumes 1 unit per 20 acres Agriculture 4 Agriculture 186.6 18 Assumes 1 unit per 10 acres 5 Agriculture 249.9 25 Assumes 1 unit per 10 acres 6 Agriculture 661.5 66 Assumes 1 unit per 10 acres Appendix DRAFT: DOCUMENT APPENDIX Appendix ‘B’ TRIP GENERATION PORTER COUNTY AIRPORT ZONE TRIP GENERATION Land Use ITE Trip Generation Code Size Unit AM Trips AM IN AM OUT PM Trips PM IN PM OUT Development Zone 1 1 Residential 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing 129 units 100 25 75 135 85 50 2 Light Industrial 110 - General Light Industrial 623.3 1000 sft 647 569 78 728 87 641 3 Commercial, Retail 814 - Specialty Retail Center 1361.3 1000 sft 0 0 0 3289 1447 1842 4 Business Park 770 - Business Park 2068.0 1000 sft 2785 2339 446 2450 564 1886 5 Residential 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing 12 units 18 4.5 13.5 16 10 6 6 Business Park 770 - Business Park 1534.4 1000 sft 2079 1746 333 1862 429 1433 7 Residential 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing 107 units 85 21.25 63.75 114 72 42 8 Commercial, Retail 814 - Specialty Retail Center 486.8 1000 sft 0 0 0 1190 524 666 9 Business Park 770 - Business Park 2511.2 1000 sft 3368 2829 539 2929 674 2255 9082 7535 1547 12713 3892 8821 Development Zone 2 1 Institutional 2 Business Park 770 - Business Park 238.5 1000 sft 336 282 54 336 78 258 3 Commercial, Retail 814 - Specialty Retail Center 385.5 1000 sft 0 0 0 947 417 530 4 Commercial, Retail 814 - Specialty Retail Center 1053.1 1000 sft 0 0 0 2549 1122 1427 5 Open Space 189.3 acres 6 Residential 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing 100 units 80 20 60 108 68 40 416 302 114 3940 1684 2256 Appendix DRAFT: DOCUMENT APPENDIX City Of Valparaiso | Porter County Indiana IN PLANE VIEW: A CLEAR VISION FOR THE FUTURE PORTER COUNTY AIRPORT ZONE TRIP GENERATION Land Use ITE Trip Generation Code Size Unit AM Trips AM IN AM OUT PM Trips PM IN PM OUT Development Zone 3 1 Light Industrial 110 - General Light Industrial 7937.5 1000 sft 9277 8164 1113 11188 1343 9845 2 Open Space 40.5 acres 3 Residential 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing 102.0 units 81 20.25 60.75 110 69 41 4 Institutional - Fairgrounds 495 - Recreational Community Center 149.5 1000 sft 243 148 95 246 71 175 5 Agriculture 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing 8.0 units 16 4 12 12 8 4 6 Institutional - Jail 571 - Prison 450.0 beds 45 24 21 23 2 21 7 Light Industrial 110 - General Light Industrial 359.4 1000 sft 335 295 40 351 42 309 9997 8655 1342 11930 1535 10395 Development Zone 4 1 Heavy Industrial 120 - General Heavy Industrial 654.1 acres 1296 1063 233 1413 297 1116 Development Zone 5 1 Aviation 1181.7 acres Development Zone 6 1 Business Park 770 - Business Park 197.1 1000 sft 279 234 45 282 65 217 2 Multi-Family Residential 240 - Mobile Home Park 300 units 101 17 84 174 117 57 3 Light Industrial 110 - General Light Industrial 4741.1 1000 sft 5506 4845 661 6617 794 5823 4 Residential 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing 4 units 13 3.25 9.75 6 4 2 5899 5100 799 7079 979 6100 Appendix DRAFT: DOCUMENT APPENDIX City Of Valparaiso | Porter County Indiana IN PLANE VIEW: A CLEAR VISION FOR THE FUTURE PORTER COUNTY AIRPORT ZONE TRIP GENERATION Land Use ITE Trip Generation Code Size Unit AM Trips AM IN AM OUT PM Trips PM IN PM OUT Development Zone 7 1 Medium Industrial 130 - Industrial Park 7447.7 1000 sft 2850 2337 513 5777 1214 4563 Development Zone 8 1 Residential 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing 80 units 66 16.5 49.5 88 55 33 2 Agriculture 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing 122 units 95 23.75 71.25 129 81 48 3 Conservation Agriculture 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing 42 units 39 9.75 29.25 50 32 19 4 Agriculture 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing 18 units 23 5.75 17.25 23 14 9 5 Agriculture 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing 25 units 27 6.75 20.25 31 20 11 6 Agriculture 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing 66 units 56 14 42 74 47 27 306 77 230 395 249 146 AM Trips AM IN AM OUT PM Trips PM IN PM OUT 29846 25069 4777 43247 9851 33396 Appendix DRAFT: DOCUMENT APPENDIX Appendix ‘C’ ESTIMATED WASTEWATER AND WATER DEMANDS PORTER COUNTY AIRPORT ZONE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE (UTILITY CALCULATIONS) Water Fully Area Size Wastewater 30 year Average Fully Developed Water 30 year Land Use Units Developed Peak (Acreage) Flow Factor* Daily Flows Average Daily Flow Peak Demand Demand (gallons/day) (gallons/day) (gallons/day) (gallons/day) Development Zone 1 1 Residential 129.3 330 gallons/(day*acre) 42570 42570 200329 200329 2 Light Industrial 47.7 1149 gallons/(day*acre) 0 54812 0 257938 3 Commercial, Retail 125 1149 gallons/(day*acre) 128400 143637 604237 675938 4 Business Park 189.9 1149 gallons/(day*acre) 58781 218213 276618 1026885 5 Residential 14.4 660 gallons/(day*acre) 9240 9240 43482 43482 6 Business Park 140.9 1149 gallons/(day*acre) 43614 161907 205242 761917 7 Residential 86.1 660 gallons/(day*acre) 56760 56760 267106 267106 8 Commercial, Retail 44.7 1149 gallons/(day*acre) 45916 51365 216075 241715 9 Business Park 230.6 1149 gallons/(day*acre) 0 264981 0 1246970 Subtotal: 385,282 1,003,485 1,813,090 4,722,281 Development Zone 2 1 Institutional 67.3 1149.094 gallons/(day*acre) 0 0 0 0 2 Business Park 21.9 1149 gallons/(day*acre) 0 25165 0 118424 3 Commercial, Retail 35.4 1149 gallons/(day*acre) 0 40678 0 191426 4 Commercial, Retail 96.7 1149 gallons/(day*acre) 0 111117 0 522906 5 Open Space 189.3 0 gallons/(day*acre) 0 0 0 0 6 Residential 50.8 660 gallons/(day*acre) 33660 33660 158400 158400 Subtotal: 33,660 210,621 158,400 991,156 *Metcalf & Eddy, 2003 Appendix DRAFT: DOCUMENT APPENDIX City Of Valparaiso | Porter County Indiana IN PLANE VIEW: A CLEAR VISION FOR THE FUTURE PORTER COUNTY AIRPORT ZONE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE (UTILITY CALCULATIONS) Water Fully Area Size Wastewater 30 year Average Fully Developed Water 30 year Land Use Units Developed Peak (Acreage) Flow Factor* Daily Flows Average Daily Flow Peak Demand Demand (gallons/day) (gallons/day) (gallons/day) (gallons/day) Development Zone 3 1 Light Industrial 607.4 1149 gallons/(day*acre) 73635 697960 346519 3284518 2 Open Space 40.5 0 gallons/(day*acre) 0 0 0 0 3 Residential 51.3 660 gallons/(day*acre) 33660 33660 158400 158400 Used 25% of Fairground site based on 4 Institutional 76.9 1149 gallons/(day*acre) 22091 22091 103959 103959 Google Earth approximation 5 Agriculture 82.3 3.3 gallons/(day*acre) 168 168.3 792 792 Used 450 Liters per inmate per day for jail gallons/ 6 Institutional 20.7 1149 53738 53738 252886 252886 (452 inmate capacity per Porter County (day*inmate) Sheriff’s Department) 7 Light Industrial 27.5 1149 gallons/(day*acre) 3334 31600 15689 148706 Subtotal: 186,627 839,218 878,245 3,949,261 Development Zone 4 1 Heavy Industrial 654.1 2993 gallons/(day*acre) 383694 1957715 1805619 9212776 Subtotal: 383,694 1,957,715 1,805,619 9,212,776 Development Zone 5 Used 15% of Airport Property as Light 1 Aviation 1181.7 1149 gallons/(day*acre) 203683 203683 958507 958507 Industrial/Commercial based on Google Earth image.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Outdoor Adventures
    1 M18 Alyea Park 2 M18 Ambler Flatwoods Nature Preserve 3 M18 American Discovery Trail 4 M18 Aukiki Wetland Conservation Area 5 M18 Bailly Homestead and Chellberg Farm 6 M18 Barker Woods 7 M18 Beverly Shores Area OUTDOOR ADVENTURES MAP 8 M18 Bicentennial Park 9 M18 Bluhm County Park 10 M18 Brincka-Cross Gardens 11 M18 Broken Wagon Bison 12 M18 Brookdale Park 13 M18 C&O Greenway 14 M18 Calumet Bike Trail 15 M18 Calumet Park 16 M18 Campbell Street Access 17 M18 Central Avenue Beach 18 M18 Central Park Plaza 19 M18 Chustak Public Fishing Area 20 M18 Coffee Creek Park A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y 21 M18 Coffee Creek Watershed Preserve 22 M18 Countryside Park and Alton Goin Museum 1 1 23 M18 Cowles Bog Trail 24 M18 Creek Ridge County Park 95 New Buffalo 25 M18 Creekside Park 2 2 26 M18 Cressmoor Prairie Nature Preserve 27 M18 239 94 Dale B. Engquist Nature Preserve 12 28 M18 Deep River County Park US BIKE ROUTE #36 3 Wilson Rd 3 29 M18 Deep River Water Trail Michiana MICHIGAN 30 M18 Deer Trail Park Michiana 77 W 10 E 1000 N ShShooresres 00 N INDIANA 31 M18 Drazer Park (Thomas S. Drazer Memorial Park) E 0 0 5 Long 94 4 N 32 M18 Dunbar Beach 4 E 900 N 77 Beach 12 US BIKE ROUTE #36 33 M18 Dune Park Station 128 44 2 Tryon Rd 39 92 d W 800 N Saugany 15 R 34 E k M18 Dune Succession Trail Lake c E i 5 W Michigan 2 w 131 0 r Blvd 4 0 Hudson a 212 3 124 N K t Lake S N Meer Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Lodged Consent Decree US Steel #2733655 (PDF)
    USDC IN/ND case 2:18-cv-00127 document 2-1 filed 04/02/18 page 1 of 59 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION __________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) and the STATE OF INDIANA, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Case No. v. ) ) Judge UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ ) CONSENT DECREE USDC IN/ND case 2:18-cv-00127 document 2-1 filed 04/02/18 page 2 of 59 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 1 II. OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................. 4 III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ...................................................................................... 4 IV. APPLICABILITY ............................................................................................................ 5 V. DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................. 6 VI. COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................ 12 VII. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SUBMITTALS ...................................................... 17 VIII. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................... 19 IX. PAYMENT OF NOAA COSTS ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Plan by the Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission (NIRPC) Table of Contents
    The Marquette Action Plan A Plan by the Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission (NIRPC) Table of Contents Tyson Warner, AICP 4 Introduction Executive Director 4 History of the Marquette Plan 5 Overview Kathy Luther 6 Need for an Action Plan Chief of Staff 7 Lake Michigan Shoreline Access 8 Outreach Eman Ibrahim 9 Survey Results Planning Manager 13 Regional Approach Sarah Geinosky 14 Current Regionwide Shoreline Access Former GIS Analyst 16 Accessibility for All Project Manager 18 Pedestrian and Bicycle Access 20 Canoe and Kayak Access Gabrielle Biciunas 22 Fishing Access 24 Parking Access Long-Range Planner 26 Access by Public Transit 28 Planning Coordination James Winters 30 Tourism, Marketing, and Wayfinding Coordination Transit Planner 33 Community Approach Northwest Indiana Regional 34 Hammond 38 Whiting Development Authority (RDA) 42 East Chicago Bill Hanna 46 Gary West President and CEO 50 Gary East 54 Portage and Ogden Dunes 58 Burns Harbor and Dune Acres Policy Analytics 62 Indiana Dunes State Park, the Town of Porter, and Chesterton William Sheldrake 66 Beverly Shores, the Town of Pines, and the National Lakeshore East President 70 Michigan City, Long Beach, and Michiana Shores 74 Finance and Maintenance Jason O’Neill Senior Consultant The Marquette Action Plan For more information visit http://www.rdatransformation.com/ A Plan by The Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission June 2018 www.nirpc.org Requests for alternate formats: please contact Mary Thorne at NIRPC at (219) 763-6060 extension 131 or at [email protected]. Individuals with hearing impairments may contact us through the Indiana Relay 711 service by calling 711 or (800) 743-3333.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Indiana Public Service Company (“NIPSCO” Or the “Company”), Serves Approximately 468,000 Electric Customers Across the Northern Third of Indiana
    RECEIVED October 31, 2014 INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION 2014 Integrated Resource Plan November 1, 2014 Volume I NIPSCO 2014 Integrated Resource Plan ("IRP") Overview Overview of NIPSCO Northern Indiana Public Service Company (“NIPSCO” or the “Company”), serves approximately 468,000 electric customers across the northern third of Indiana. Resources used to serve our customers include company owned generating facilities with a total Net Demonstrated Capability (“NDC”) of 3,405 megawatts (“MW”) of coal, natural gas and hydroelectric generation, as well as long-term purchases of wind generation. NIPSCO supplements these resources with short-term purchases of energy from the markets operated by the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (“MISO”), of which NIPSCO is a member. Why does NIPSCO Develop and Submit an IRP? In the normal course of business NIPSCO plans to reliably and cost-effectively meet its customers’ electricity service needs. The purpose of these planning efforts is to develop a resilient and reliable plan to meet the needs of customers in an uncertain and changing environment. As a result, NIPSCO’s long-term plan may change over time as conditions change and information is updated. In addition, according to 170 IAC 4-7-3, 170 IAC 4-7 et seq. (“Rule 7”), each public, municipally owned and cooperatively owned utility in the State of Indiana is required to submit an IRP to the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (“Commission” or “IURC”) every two years. As used in Rule 7, the IRP is the utility’s assessment of a variety of demand-side and supply-side resources to cost- effectively meet customer electricity service needs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 - 2018 Lake County Parks and Recreation Master Plan
    2014 - 2018 LAKE COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN FINAL PLAN April 2014 This publication has been prepared by the Lake County Parks and Recreation Department. For clariication or additional information, please contact the following: Robert Nickovich, Chief Executive Oficer Lake County Parks and Recreation Department 8411 East Lincoln Highway Crown Point, Indiana 46307 219-769-7275 Craig Zandstra, Special Projects Coordinator Lake County Parks and Recreation Department 8411 East Lincoln Highway Crown Point, Indiana 46307 219-769-7275 All information contained herein is expressly the property of the Lake County Parks and Recreation Department. Should any or all of this publication be duplicated elsewhere, we request appropriate attributions for such usage. Prepared By: Lake County Parks and Recreation Department 8411 East Lincoln Highway Crown Point, Indiana 46307 219-945-0543 www.lakecountyparks.com Prepared August 2013 - April 2014 2014 - 2018 LAKE COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN PREFACE 4 LAKE COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLAN 2014 - 2018 PREFACE IDNR Acceptance Letter Michael R. Pence, Governor Cameron F. Clark, Director Division of Outdoor Recreation DNR Indiana Department of Natural Resources 402 W. Washington Street W271 Indianapolis, IN 46204-2782 317-232-4070 Fax: 317-233-4648 www.IN.gov/dnr/outdoor James W. Tonkovich January 9th, 2015 Park Board President Lake County Park and Recreation Board 8411 East Lincoln Highway Crown Point, IN 46307 Dear Mr. Tonkovich, The DNR Division of Outdoor Recreation planning staff has reviewed the final draft of the 2015-2019 Lake County Five Year Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The plan meets the Department of Natural Resources’ minimum requirements for local parks and recreation master plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Porter County, Indiana a Coastal Community Smart Growth Case Study Author: Rebecca Pearson Editor: Victoria Pebbles, Great Lakes Commission
    Porter County, Indiana A Coastal Community Smart Growth Case Study Author: Rebecca Pearson Editor: Victoria Pebbles, Great Lakes Commission Porter County is one contributed to a of Indiana’s three regional waterfront coastal counties that plan in 2005 and hug the shores of streamlined its codes Lake Michigan and and regulations to is located about 50 position the county miles east of to better achieve the Chicago. During the goals set forth in late 1900s and early both plans. 2000s housing boom, Porter County Comprehensive experienced pressure Plan to convert its The 2001Porter farmland and open County Land Use & spaces to urbanized Thoroughfare Plan development. guides the county’s Between 1990 and growth into the 2000, nearly 45 future by creating a percent of residential framework for unit constructed in communities to the county were in implement smart unincorporated areas. growth elements related to mixed land uses and compact building Around the same time, residential and commercial design as well as preserving and protecting the development strained the county’s transportation county’s existing character. The comprehensive infrastructure as traffic volumes on the region’s plan was developed with significant public and highways rose by 50 percent from 1980 to 20001. In stakeholder input. Five focus groups representing 2006, nearly 33.6 percent of the county residents— economic, development, agricultural and about 35,000 people--commuted outside the county environmental interests in the community, met to for work. Of that, 6.5 percent (6,800) commuted determine the strengths, weaknesses, daily to Illinois, and 21 percent (21,900) commuted opportunities and threats (SWOT) within Porter to neighboring Lake County, Indiana.
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Adventures
    OUTDOOR ADVENTURES R E D N A W ∙ L E D D P A ∙ E H I K S H ∙ B I K E ∙ B I R D ∙ F I INDIANA DUNES OUTDOOR ADVENTURES Lace up your hiking boots. Tie down the kayaks. Pack the fishing poles. And don’t forget your binoculars. It’s time for a new outdoor adventure—Indiana Dunes style. While you may be familiar with Lake Michigan’s Whether you prefer your adventures on land southern shoreline, you may not realize that or in the water, the Indiana Dunes is the there’s far more to discover beyond the place to take a chance on a new trek. Go beaches of the Indiana Dunes. The Indiana beyond the beaches and discover where Dunes area is a birding mecca in the spring, your Indiana Dunes journey takes you. a kayaker’s oasis on a hot summer day, and an angler’s dream on a crisp fall morning. Accessible Camping Equestrian Fee Gift Shop/ Trails Sales Hunting Pet-Friendly Restrooms/ Swimming Picnicking Portable Beach Indiana Department Indiana Dunes Porter County Shirley Heinze of Natural Resources National Park Parks & Recreation Land Trust (DNR) (NPS) Northwest Indiana Regional Planning Commission (NIRPC) Greenways + Blueways “The dunes are to the Midwest what the Grand Canyon is to Arizona…They constitute a signature of time and eternity.” —poet Carl Sandburg Discover #BeachesandBeyond outdoor adventures on social media! 2 beachoutdooradventures.com TABLE OF CONTENTS ADVENTURES HIKING HIKING SAFETY TIPS 35 AT-A-GLANCE TOP 15 TRAILS 36 THE 3 DUNE CHALLENGE 41 BICYCLING BICYCLING SAFETY TIPS 9 PADDLING BICYCLE RENTALS 9 PADDLING SAFETY TIPS 43 BICYCLING
    [Show full text]
  • Bailly Generating Station, NIPSCO, January 1991
    Environmental Monitoring Plan Advanced Flue Gas Desulfurization Project Bailly Generating Station January 1991 FINAL , , Pure Air on the Lake, timitedpartnership FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN WI FOR BAILLY GENERATING STATION ADVANCED FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION PROJECT SUBMIllED TO U.S. DEPARTMENTOF ENERGY PITTSBURGH ENERGY TECHNOLOGYCENTER P.O. BOX 10940 PIllSBURGH. PA 15236-0940 BY PURE AIR ON THE LAKE, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP C/O AIR PRODUCTSAND CHEMICALS, INC. 7201 HAMILTON BOULEVARD ALLENTOWN, PA 18195-1501 NORTHERNINDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY 5265 HOHf44NAVE. HAMMOND. IN 46320 JANUARY, 1991 PURE AIR, NORTHERNINDIANA BAILLY GENERATING STATION ADVANCED FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN (Ew) TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 PURPOSE OF EMP l-l 1.2 SCOPE l-l 1.2.1 CATEGORIES OF ENVIRONMENTAL MON1TORING l-l 1.2.2 DURATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 1-2 1.2.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA AND PARAMETERS l-2 1.2.4 DATA COLLECTION l-5 1.3 ORGANIZATION OF EMP l-5 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2-l 2.1 PROJECT PROPONENTS, PURPOSE AND LOCATION 2-1 2.2 PROJECT PHASES 2-5 2.3 PROJECT SCHEDULE 2-5 2.4 PROCESS DESCRIPTION 2-6 2.5 EMISSIONS AND DISCHARGES 2-a 2.5.1 ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS 2-a 2.5.2 WASTEWATERDISCHARGES 2-a 2.5.3 SOLID WASTES 2-a 2.6 EMISSIONS AND DISCHARGES CONTROL 2-9 2.6.1 ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS CONTROL 2-10 2.6.2 WASTEWATERDISCHARGES CONTROL 2-10 2.6.3 SOLID WASTES CONTROL 2-11 5125T -i- l/91 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTD) SECTION PAGE 3.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 3-l 3.1 ATMOSPHERIC RESOURCES 3-l 3.1.1
    [Show full text]
  • ASSESSMENT PLAN for the NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT of the EAST BRANCH LITTLE CALUMET RIVER / BURNS WATERWAY and ASSOCIATED LAKE MICHIGAN ENVIRONMENTS
    ASSESSMENT PLAN for the NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT of the EAST BRANCH LITTLE CALUMET RIVER / BURNS WATERWAY AND ASSOCIATED LAKE MICHIGAN ENVIRONMENTS February 2021 Prepared by: U.S. Department of the Interior State of Indiana U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Department of Environmental Management and and National Park Service Department of Natural Resources TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT A NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT ........................................... 1 PURPOSE OF THE ASSESSMENT PLAN .................................................................................................... 2 DECISION TO PERFORM A TYPE B ASSESSMENT .................................................................................... 4 PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF DAMAGES ................................................................................................ 4 COORDINATION WITH OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES ................................................................. 5 PARTICIPATION IN THE ASSESSMENT BY NON-TRUSTEE PARTIES ......................................................... 5 ORGANIZATION OF THE ASSESSMENT PLAN.......................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ......................................................................... 7 GEOLOGIC SETTING OF THE ASSESSMENT AREA AND THE SOUTHERN LAKE MICHIGAN DUNES ...........
    [Show full text]
  • Marquette Greenway Trail Sub - Area Plan
    Marquette Greenway Trail Sub - Area Plan Summary Report june 2009 Acknowledgement Contents Burns Harbor Town Council Acknowledgements Jim McGee, President i Toni Biancardi, Vice-President Louis Bain II Introduction 1 T. Clifford Fleming Robert M. Perrine Process 3 Burns Harbor Clerk-Treasurer Community Engagement 3 Jane Jordan Draft Alternatives 4 Burns Harbor Plan Commission Jeff Freeze, President Background 5 Terry Swanson, Vice-President The Marquette Vision 5 Louis Bain II Prior Studies 6 Virginia Bain Ongoing Initiatives 7 T. Clifford Fleming Jim McGee Opportunities & Constraints 9 Jim Meeks Suitability Analysis 9 Stakeholders Market Analysis 11 Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Costa Dillon, Superintendent Preferred Plan 13 Garry Traynham, Assistant Superintendent Guiding Principles 13 Eric Ehn, Landscape Architect The Composite Plan 13 Indiana Department of Natural Resources Trail Experience 15 Mike Molnar Trail Character Zones 15 Jenny Orsburn Bridges & Underpasses 19 Sergio Mendoza Edge Development 21 Joe Exl Trailheads & Nodes 23 Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission Trail Standards 25 (NIRPC) John Swanson, Executive Director Implementation 27 Mitch Barloga, Planner Trail Standards 27 City of Portage Next Steps 28 Joe Csikos, Director – Community Planning and Development Clarke Johnson, Superintendent –Parks and Recreation Craig Hendrix, Director – Public Works Town of Porter Mike Genger, Councilman Bruce Snyder, Porter Redevelopment Commission Holladay Properties Tim Healy, Vice-President Mike Micka American Planning
    [Show full text]
  • National Park Service U.S
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Evaluation of Reference Conditions for Coastal Sand Habitats of Southern Lake Michigan at Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore GLRI #94 Task Agreement #J 6300100405 Final Report ON THE COVER Lake Michigan and Mt. Baldy view from the east looking west along the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore coastal shoreline. Photograph used with permission from National Park Service, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Evaluation of Reference Conditions for Coastal Sand Habitats of Southern Lake Michigan at Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore GLRI #94 Task Agreement #J 6300100405 Thomas P. Simon, PhD The School of Public and Environmental Affairs 1315 E. Tenth Street, Room 341 Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405 Charles C. Morris, PhD National Park Service Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore 1100 N. Mineral Springs Road Porter, Indiana 47468 March 2012 The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • One Region 2016 Indicators Report
    THE 2016 ONE REGION INDICATORS REPORT Quality of Place in Northwest Indiana One Region www.oneregionnwi.org 09/20/16 TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter from President & CEO ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Achieving Social Change Through Collective Impact ................................................................................................... 10 Domain 1: People ........................................................................................................................................................ 12 Driving the Region Forward ......................................................................................................................................... 27 Domain 2: Economy ..................................................................................................................................................... 29 Breathing a Little Easier Regionwide ........................................................................................................................... 45 Domain 3: Environment ............................................................................................................................................... 47 Propelling Quality of Life Forward ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]