Ethnicized Citizenship As Illegitimate Citizenship. the Case of Mapuches in Chile and Northeasterners in India
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Ethnicized citizenship as illegitimate citizenship. The Case of Mapuches in Chile and Northeasterners in India Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor philosophiae (Dr. phil.) eingereicht an der Kultur-, Sozial- und Bildungswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin von Diplom Soziologin Andrea Catalina Silva-Tapia Präsidentin der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr. Sabine Kunst Dekanin der Kultur-, Sozial- und Bildungswissenschaftlichen Fakultät Prof. Dr. Julia von Blumenthal Gutachter: 1. Prof. Dr. Boike Rehbein 2. Prof. Dr. Klaus Eder Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 05.Februar 2016 Abstract This thesis tackles the commonly overlooked issue of ethnic groups that have suffered a delegetimization of their citizenship. They are not considered as the ideal citizens of a nation-state because they do not conform ethnically to the definition of the nation. Citizenship emerges with the formation of the nation-state in a modern world system characterized by a still operating coloniality. The legitimacy of this global colonial idea of nation-state was based on the cultural concept of a nation; an illusion of a homogenous shared past, customs and language where differences were suppressed. This is the common pattern of nation-state formation and the rise of the idea of a legitimate citizen. Illegitimate citizenship is another way of naming a colonial citizenship inserted in a Eurocentric patriarchal/white and Christian-centered world-system. Citizenship is a concept referring to individuals, however, and when it is racialized or ethnicized, the individuality of the person is taken away. The racialized citizen, the illegitimate citizen is always described as part of a group; the “immigrants”, the “Muslims”, the “indigenous”, the “northeastern Indians”. They are never described as an autonomous individual subject. This individuality is reserved for white European or European- descendant people and has been coined as “white privilege”. This research describes how illegitimate citizenship empirically operates in a very similar way in two ethnic groups within two different countries that have in common a colonial subordinated position in the world system. Therefore, Mapuches in Chile and Northeastern Indians suffer a double colonization in two different scales; one regarding the position of Chile and India in the world-system and one regarding their own position within the nation-state. Keywords: ethnic groups, citizenship, coloniality, nation-state Zusammenfassung Diese Dissertation befasst sich mit dem oft vernachlässigten Problem ethnischer Gruppen, die eine Delegitimierung ihrer Staatsbürgerschaft erfahren haben. Sie gelten nicht als „richtige“ Staatsbürger eines Nationalstaates, da sie nicht der ethnischen Definition der Nation entsprechen. Staatsbürgerschaft entsteht im Zuge der Bildung von Nationalstaaten in einem modernen Weltsystem, das nach wie vor kolonial geprägt ist. Die Legitimität dieser globalen kolonialen Idee des Nationalstaates basierte auf dem kulturellen Konzept einer Nation; der Illusion einer homogenen gemeinsamen Vergangenheit, gemeinsamer Gebräuche und einer gemeinsamen Sprache, in der Unterschiede unterdrückt werden. Auf diesem Modell basiert die Idee eines legitimen Bürgers. Illegitime Staatsbürgerschaft ist eine andere Art und Weise, eine koloniale Staatsbürgerschaft zu benennen, die in ein eurozentrisches, patriarchalisch/weiß und christlich zentriertes Weltsystem eingebettet ist. Staatsbürgerschaft ist ein Konzept, das sich auf Individuen bezieht. Durch Rassializierung und Ethnisierung wird dem Mensch seine Individualität genommen. Der rassifizierte - illegitime Bürger wird stets als Teil einer Gruppe beschrieben; die "Einwanderer", die "Muslime", die "Indigenen", die "Inder des Nordostens". Sie werden nie als autonomes individuelles Subjekt beschrieben. Diese Individualität ist den weißen europäischen oder europäischen Nachkommen vorbehalten und wird als "weißes Privileg" bezeichnet. Diese Dissertation beschreibt, wie ähnlich die illegitime Staatsbürgerschaft in zwei unterschiedlichen Ländern empirisch operiert, die beide eine koloniale, untergeordnete Position im Weltsystem einnehmen. Die untersuchten Gruppen – die Mapuche in Chile und die Menschen im Nordosten Indiens – leiden unter einer doppelten Kolonialisierung. Zum einen aufgrund der Position von Chile und Indien im Weltsystem, zum anderen bezüglich der geringen Wertschätzung innerhalb des Nationalstaates. Schlagwörter: ethnische Gruppen, Staatsbürgerschaft, Kolonialität, Nationalstaat Berlin, 11.12.2017 Acknowledgments “-Blumenfeld: Don´t you have any love for your own people? (…) -Arendt: Ohh Kurt! You know me, I have never loved any people, so why should I love a folk in particular? I love my friends… this is the only love I am able to feel…” (Excerpt from the movie Hannah Arendt) This dissertation is dedicated to all the people who suffer injustice because of their belonging to a particular nation or ethnic group; those who suffer discriminations and even sometimes atrocities for belonging to the “wrong” nation, ethnicity, culture or citizenship. At the time of concluding my dissertation, the number of refugees arriving to Europe has increased enormously and many nationalist reactions have arisen. As a critical person and researcher who stands against nationalist and racist manifestations, I would especially like to dedicate this thesis to the refugees suffering discrimination and racism, in addition to the pain they carry within them. I could not have achieved this dissertation without the support of my friend, colleague and life partner Sebastian Drescher, and the support of my family. Sebastian not only supported me emotionally, but also reviewed my work and ideas, and helped me improve them. My family – mother, father and brother – were a big emotional support throughout my PhD research and have always lovingly encouraged me to achieve my goals. This research would not have been possible without the support of my two scholarship institutions: DAAD and CONICYT. I am enormously grateful to both of these institutions and their supportive staff who provided me with all the help and assistance I needed. I would especially like to thank both my supervisors. To Professor Boike Rehbein for his inspiration, critiques and patience, as well as his support and guidance for my trips to India. To Professor Klaus Eder, thank you for your engaged and rigorous critiques, which led me to revise parts of my present dissertation. In addition, I would like to thank Professor Aldo Mascareño from Adolfo Ibanez University in Chile for his unconditional help since the beginning of my academic life. During these years of lonely research, I have been inspired by many professors, early-stage researchers and PhD students who helped me through discussions and shared information or simply listened to me and commented on my ideas. I would like to thank Professor Jessé Souza from Brasil, Professor Anand Kumar and Professor Surinder Jodhka from India, for their comments and inspirations. I extend this gratitude to my colleagues in the research colloquiums of Professor Rehbein: Simin Fadaee, Janina Myrczik, Tamer Soyler, Christian Schneickert, Benjamin Baumann, Luzia Costa, Karina Maldonado and Michael Kleinod. I also extend my gratitude to many other students who inspired me in India, Chile and Germany, during discussions over lunch, coffee, conferences or even online chatting. I am very grateful to all the people I interviewed in Chile and India. Thank you for trusting me and making this research possible. Finally, I have to thank all the friends and colleagues who helped me with the tiring and difficult work of reviewing different parts of my thesis, editing the English language and giving me some valuable comments. Diana Kallas, Satish Thalla, Janina Myrczik, Debashree Roy and Michelle Bolourchi: Thank you again and again! Ethnicized citizenship as illegitimate citizenship. The Case of Mapuches in Chile and Northeasterners in India Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 PART I: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................ 12 CHAPTER 1: THE CONSTITUTION OF PEOPLE IN A STILL COLONIAL WORLD-SYSTEM: THE FORMATION OF ILLEGITIMATE CITIZENSHIP ............................................................................................................. 13 Section 1: Situating the concepts in a still colonial World-System ........................................................... 13 1) The concept of power in the decolonial turn .......................................................................................................14 2) Decolonization: A point of inflection and not only a legal-political Independence ............................................14 3) The formation of colonial subjects: ethnicized citizenship as illegitimate citizenship........................................16 Section 2: Racism ..................................................................................................................................... 17 1) Balibar: Racism goes beyond race .........................................................................................................................17 2) Weiss: Racism as symbolic capital .........................................................................................................................18