DISTRICT OF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Council Chambers – Community Centre 4450-6th Street Peachland Tuesday, April 23, 2013 at 7:00 P.M.

Page

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA

3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA

4. PRESENTATIONS & DELEGATIONS

A. 2012 Financial Statements/ Audit Report Rob Collins- Grant Thornton

5. ADOPTION OF MINUTES

A. Regular Council Meeting held April 9, 2013 5 - 11

B. Special Council Meeting held April 9, 2013 13 - 14

C. Special Council Meeting held April 17, 2013 15 - 16

6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS

7. COMMITTEE & STAFF REPORTS

A. Minutes to be received for information: 17 - 25  COTW Meeting held April 9, 2013  PEDC Meeting held March 14, 2013 Receive for Information

B. Committee of the Whole Summary 27 2 Action Items

8. ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE

A. Financial Plan Bylaw No. 2051, 2013 29 - 47 First, Second and Third Reading Consideration

B. Tax Rates Bylaw No. 2053, 2013 49 - 53 First, Second and Third Reading Consideration

Page 1 of 181 Page

C. 2013 Parcel Tax Bylaw No. 2054, 2055, 2056, 2057, 2058, 2059, 2060, 55 - 75 2061, and 2062 First, Second and Third Reading Consideration

D. Funding for Climate Change Showdown 77 - 87 Request for Decision

9. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT

A. Zoning Application from R1, Single Family to CD-10 Comprehensive 89 - 107 Development 5251 Buchanan Road, Peachland Request for Decision

B. Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmentally 109 - 143 sensitive area 5261 Buchanan Road Request for Decision

C. Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor 145 - 166 Request for Decision

D. Morrison Hershfield Renewable Energy Opportunities Study 167 - 175 Request for Decision

10. PUBLIC WORKS NIL

11. MAYOR & COUNCILLORS' REPORTS

12. NOTICE OF MOTION

13. CORRESPONDENCE

For Action:

For Information:

A. Basin Water Board 177 Re: Application Approved for Water Conservation and Quality Improvement Grant

B. Okanagan Basin Water Board Report 179 Re: Board Report dated April 4, 2013

C. BC Small Business Round Table 181 Re: Invitation to Municipalities to compete for the 2013 Open for Business Award

14. OTHER BUSINESS

Page 2 of 181 Page

15. QUESTION PERIOD

16. ADJOURNMENT

Polly Palmer Corporate Officer April 19, 2013

Page 3 of 181 Page 4 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 5.A.

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND

Regular Council Meeting Minutes Held Tuesday, April 9, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. In the Council Chambers – Community Centre

PRESENT: Mayor Fielding, Councillors Condon, Fortin, Hall, Kerbes Moberg and Schierbeck

CAO Elsie Lemke Corporate Officer Polly Palmer Director of Community Services Cheryl Wiebe

Members of the Public Members of the Media

ABSENT:

CALL TO ORDER Mayor Fielding called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA

APPROVAL OF THE MOVED by Councillor Schierbeck, SECONDED by Councillor Kerbes: AGENDA RC-04/09/13-001 THAT the agenda for the April 9, 2013 Council meeting be approved as presented CARRIED.

ADOPTION OF MINUTES

REGULAR Discussion ensued relative to: COUNCIL MEETING  Renewable Energy Opportunities - $25,000 is left in the budget for a HELD MARCH 26, more detailed feasibility study respecting a Hydropower project on 2013 Peachland Creek, only if Council decides to move forward with renewable energy after receiving the Morrison Hershfield Alternate Energy Opportunity Study

MOVED by Councillor Moberg, SECONDED by Councillor Schierbeck:

RC-04/09/13-002 THAT the minutes of the Regular Council meeting held March 26, 2013 be adopted as presented CARRIED.

UNFINISHED BUSINESS

Regular Council Meeting held April 9, 2013 Page 5 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 5.A. Regular Council Meeting Minutes April 9, 2013 Page 2

COMMITTEE & STAFF REPORTS

COMMITTEE MOVED by Councillor Kerbes, SECONDED by Councillor Condon: MEETING MINUTES FOR INFORMATION RC-04/09/13-003 THAT the following minutes be received for information:  COTW minutes of March 26, 2013  Mayor's Task Force on Climate Change minutes of February 27, 2013  Highway 97 Committee meeting minutes of February 4, 2013  Tourism Advisory Committee meeting minutes of February 26, 2013

CARRIED.

COTW RECOMMENDATIONS RESIDENTIAL WATER DEMAND MOVED by Councillor Schierbeck, SECONDED by Councillor Kerbes: CALCULATOR RC-04/09/13-004 THAT Council receive for information, the Residential Water Demand Calculator as presented by Tjaart Van den Berg, Landfill Technologies Inc. and Ramon Lawrence, Computer Science, UBC Okanagan; and

THAT Council approve the District entering into the UBC Okanagan research program that provides water use information interface for Peachland residential customers.

CARRIED. DOG OFF-LEASH AREA GUIDELINES MOVED by Councillor Schierbeck, SECONDED by Councillor Kerbes:

RC-04/09/13-005 THAT Council support the proposed dog off-leash area guidelines as well as a multi-year strategy for improving access and availability of off-leash areas in Peachland, to be considered for future budget years.

CARRIED.

MANAGEMENT MOVED by Councillor Schierbeck, SECONDED by Councillor Moberg: OPERATING AGREEMENTS FOR RC-04/09/13-006 THAT Council approve entering into the Management and THE PRIMARY Operating Agreement with the Okanagan Boys and Girls Club, replacing the SCHOOL current agreement which expires December 31, 2013; and

THAT Council approves entering into the Management and Operating Agreement with the Peachland Chamber of Commerce, subject to finalizing the annual compensation.

Regular Council Meeting held April 9, 2013 Page 6 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 5.A. Regular Council Meeting Minutes April 9, 2013 Page 3

AMENDMENT TO Discussion ensued relative to: THE MOTION  Having the management and operating agreements expire every three years so that Council’s of each term can decide if they want to renew the agreements  The importance of giving the two groups security in their location by having a five year agreement  The costs that the two groups are investing into furnishing and decorating their spaces in the Primary School

MOVED by Councillor Hall, SECONDED by Councillor Kerbes:

RC-04/09/13-007 THAT the management and operating agreements with the Okanagan Boys and Girls Club and the Chamber of Commerce be changed from a five year term to a three year term

CARRIED. Councillor Schierbeck OPPOSED. Councillor Moberg OPPOSED. Mayor Fielding OPPOSED.

MAIN MOTION AS MOVED by Councillor Schierbeck, SECONDED by Councillor Moberg: AMENDED RC-04/09/13-006 THAT Council approve entering into the Management and Operating Agreement with the Okanagan Boys and Girls Club, replacing the current agreement which expires December 31, 2013 for a period of three years; and

THAT Council approves entering into the Management and Operating Agreement with the Peachland Chamber of Commerce, subject to finalizing the annual compensation for a period of three years.

CARRIED. Councillor Schierbeck OPPOSED. Councillor Moberg OPPOSED. Mayor Fielding OPPOSED.

MANAGEMENT OPERATING MOVED by Councillor Hall, SECONDED by Councillor Fortin: AGREEMENTS FOR THE PRIMARY RC-04/09/13-008 THAT the management and operating agreements with the SCHOOL CON’T Okanagan Boys and Girls Club and the Chamber of Commerce be changed to allow for an annual budget review of the compensation amounts

DEFEATED. Councillor Schierbeck OPPOSED. Councillor Moberg OPPOSED. Councillor Kerbes OPPOSED. Mayor Fielding OPPOSED.

Regular Council Meeting held April 9, 2013 Page 7 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 5.A. Regular Council Meeting Minutes April 9, 2013 Page 4

DEPARTMENT REPORTS FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH

DEPARTMENT Discussion REPORTS FOR  Ponderosa Golf Course MARCH  Property across from the Bliss development being for sale.  Skate Park – no recent complaints, had some small tags on the site that were removed immediately.

MOVED by Councillor Schierbeck, SECONDED by Councillor Moberg:

RC-04/09/13-009 THAT Council receive the following March Department Reports for information:  Building Inspection and Bylaw Enforcement  Community Services and Recreation  Corporate Services  Fire Department  Planning and Development  Public Works CARRIED.

ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE

SEWER RATES MOVED by Councillor Kerbes, SECONDED by Councillor Condon: AMENDMENT BYLAW 2045 RC-04/09/13-010 THAT Sewer Rates Bylaw No. 1935 Amendment Bylaw No. 2045, 2013 be finally reconsidered and adopted

CARRIED.

COMMUNITY Mayor Fielding presented a report regarding amendments to the Recreation RECREATION Policy FIN-035 that allows the Director of Community Services to waive POLICY FIN-035 equipment rentals under $100.00

Discussion relative to:

 Discretion given to Community Services Director to waive amounts that exceed $100;  Different scenario with respect to rentals and use of equipment

MOVED by Councillor Kerbes, SECONDED by Councillor Schierbeck:

RC-04/09/13-011 THAT Council approves the amendments to the Community Recreation Policy, FIN-035 as outlined in the staff report dated March 2, 2013

Regular Council Meeting held April 9, 2013 Page 8 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 5.A. Regular Council Meeting Minutes April 9, 2013 Page 5

AMENDMENT TO MOVED by Councillor Kerbes, SECONDED by Councillor Hall: THE MOTION RC-04/09/13-012 THAT the motion to amend the Community Recreation Policy FIN-035 be amended to include that the Director of Community Services have the discretion to waive rental fees up to $100

DEFEATED. COUNCILLOR Schierbeck OPPOSED. COUNCILLOR Fortin OPPOSED. COUNCILLOR Moberg OPPOSED. COUNCILLOR Condon OPPOSED. COUNCILLOR Kerbes OPPOSED.

MAIN MOTION MOVED by Councillor Kerbes, SECONDED by Councillor Schierbeck:

RC-04/09/13-011 THAT Council approves the amendments to the Community Recreation Policy, FIN-035 as outlined in the staff report dated March 2, 2013

CARRIED.

PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT

SIDEWALK AND Mayor Fielding presented a report regarding the start date in the Sidewalk and RIGHT OF WAY Right of Way Policy OCCUPANCY POLICY PRO-267 MOVED by Councillor Schierbeck, SECONDED by Councillor Moberg:

RC-04/09/13-012 THAT Schedule A to policy PRO-267 be amended by replacing “May 1” in the schedule with “April 1”, subject to the start date being determined by the Director of Operations.

AMENDMENT TO MOVED by Councillor Schierbeck, SECONDED by Councillor Moberg: THE MOTION RC-04/09/13-013 THAT the Main motion include “subject to the provisions of line painting and street sweeping if required” CARRIED.

MOVED by Councillor Schierbeck, SECONDED by Councillor Moberg: MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED RC-04/09/13-014 THAT Council amend Schedule “A” of the Sidewalk and Right of Way occupancy Policy PRO-267, by replacing the “May 1” start up date with “April 1”, subject to the provisions of line painting and street sweeping if required and the start date being approved by the Director of Operations CARRIED.

MOVED by Councillor Condon, SECONDED by Councillor Moberg:

RC-04/09/13-015 THAT Council request staff to bring back an amended bylaw for next season (2014) to permit mobile vendors and food vendors to start up April 1 subject to the approval of the Director of Operations

Regular Council Meeting held April 9, 2013 Page 9 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 5.A. Regular Council Meeting Minutes April 9, 2013 Page 6

CARRIED. PUBLIC WORKS

MAYOR & COUNCILLORS' REPORTS

COUNCILLOR Councillor Schierbeck attended: BC Transit Open house – discussion included SCHIERBECK having a rapid transit station in New Monaco development; PEDC Meeting; and, Hwy 97 Committee Meeting

COUNCILLOR Councillor Fortin attended: BC Transit Open House FORTIN

COUNCILLOR HALL Councillor Hall attended: RCMP Meeting in ; Hwy 97 Committee Meeting

COUNCILLOR Councillor Kerbes attended: Council of Forest Industries and gave a report KERBES

MAYOR FIELDING Mayor Fielding attended: Mayors Task Force Meeting; BC Transit Open House; Chronicles of Peachland had their official launch of their book sales, $25 each; RDCO meeting tomorrow; looking at request to withdraw from Regional Services; Canadian Cancer Society Daffodil month April 27th Daffodil day there will be a walk at the Community Centre at 10 am

NOTICE OF MOTION

CORRESPONDENCE

CORRESPONDENCE FOR ACTION

PADDLE FEST REQUEST MOVED by Councillor Condon, SECONDED by Councillor Kerbes:

RC-04/09/13-016 THAT Council approves the request from Paddle Fest for gratis use of the Community Centre, Cousins Park, Swim Bay and related pathways and equipment, for their August 11, 2013 event CARRIED.

ROYAL CANADIAN MOVED by Councillor Schierbeck, SECONDED by Councillor Condon: LEGION REQUEST RC-04/09/13-017 THAT Council approves the request from The Royal Canadian Legion for gratis use of tables and chairs and road closure fees for their May 19, 2013 beer gardens and street dance CARRIED.

Regular Council Meeting held April 9, 2013 Page 10 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 5.A. Regular Council Meeting Minutes April 9, 2013 Page 7

FOR INFORMATION:

REGIONAL Discussion ensued relative to: DISTRICT OF THE  whether or not Centennial Walkway, Pincushion and Harold’s CENTRAL walkway can be included in the RDCO “Tracks and Walks” Program OKANAGAN;  Regional District closed the trail left of the elementary school- this is HIGHLIGHTS – part of a fire mitigation MARCH 28, 2013 MOVED by Councillor Moberg, SECONDED by Councillor Schierbeck:

RC-04/09/13-018 THAT Council receive the Regional District of the Central Okanagan Highlights of the Special Regional Board Meeting on March 28, 2013 CARRIED.

OTHER BUSINESS

QUESTION PERIOD

ADJOURNMENT

MOVED by Councillor Moberg:

RC-04/09/13-019 THAT the Regular Council meeting be adjourned at 8:03 p.m. CARRIED.

Certified Correct. Mayor Corporate Officer

Dated at Peachland, B.C.

This ______day of ______, ______.

Regular Council Meeting held April 9, 2013 Page 11 of 181 Page 12 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 5.B.

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND

Special Council Meeting Minutes Held Tuesday, April 9, 2013 at 9:50 AM In the Council Chambers – Community Centre

PRESENT: Mayor Fielding, Councillors Condon, Fortin, Hall, Kerbes, Moberg and Schierbeck

CAO Elsie Lemke Corporate Officer Polly Palmer Director of Planning Dave Smith Director of Community Services Cheryl Wiebe

Members of the Public Members of the Media

ABSENT:

CALL TO ORDER Mayor Fielding called the meeting to order at 9:50 a.m.

APPROVAL OF THE MOVED by Councillor Schierbeck, SECONDED by Councillor Kerbes: AGENDA SC-04/09/13-001 THAT the agenda for the April 9, 2013 Special Council meeting be approved as presented CARRIED.

REPORTS / DISCUSSION

A RESOLUTION TO MOVED by Councillor Schierbeck, SECONDED by Councillor Condon: HOLD A CLOSED MEETING SC-04/09/13-002 THAT an In-Camera meeting be held on April 9, 2013 following the Committee of the Whole meeting that begins at 9:00 a.m., pursuant to the following sections of the Community Charter:

 Section 90(1)(b) [Municipal Award Consideration]  Section 90(1)(c) [Labour Relations]

CARRIED.

ADJOURNMENT

MOVED by Councillor Moberg:

SC-04/09/13-003 THAT the Special council meeting scheduled for April 9, 2013 be adjourned at 9:53 a.m. CARRIED.

Special Council Meeting held April 9, 2013 Page 13 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 5.B. Special Council Meeting Minutes April 9, 2013

Certified Correct. Mayor Corporate Officer

Dated at Peachland, B.C.

This ______day of ______, ______.

Special Council Meeting held April 9, 2013 Page 14 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 5.C.

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND

Special Council Meeting Minutes Held Wednesday, April 17, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. In the Council Chambers – Community Centre

PRESENT: Mayor Fielding, Councillors Condon, Fortin, Hall, Kerbes, Moberg and Schierbeck

CAO Elsie Lemke Corporate Officer Polly Palmer Director of Community Services Cheryl Wiebe

Members of the Public Members of the Media

ABSENT: Nil

CALL TO ORDER Mayor Fielding called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.

APPROVAL OF THE MOVED by Councillor Schierbeck, SECONDED by Councillor Condon: AGENDA SC-04/17/13-001 THAT the agenda for the April 17, 2013 Special Council meeting be approved as presented. CARRIED.

ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE

MANAGEMENT In accordance to the Community Charter (section 131(1), Mayor Fielding OPERATING brought forward the matter of the Management Operating Agreements for the AGREEMENTS- Primary School that was carried at the April 9th, 2013 Regular Council meeting, PRIMARY SCHOOL At the April 9th Council meeting the Management Operating Agreements with the Okanagan Boys & Girls Club and the Chamber of Commerce for the Primary School were changed from a 5 year term to a 3 year term.

April 9th, 2013 Council Resolution:

“RC-04/09/13-006 THAT Council approve entering into the Management and Operating Agreement with the Okanagan Boys and Girls Club, replacing the current agreement which expires December 31, 2013 for a period of 3 years; and

THAT Council approves entering into the Management and Operating Agreement with the Peachland Chamber of Commerce, subject to finalizing the annual compensation for a period of three years.”

Discussion ensued relative to:  Option for additional 5 year renewal  Agreement being corrected to read 2 million insurance  Clarification of why 3 year term rather than 5 year term – in order that Council from every three year term has the opportunity to review the agreements

Special Council Meeting held April 17, 2013 Page 15 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 5.C. COTW Meeting Minutes April 17, 2013 Page 2  The anchor tenants are not prepared to invest money into the interior MANAGEMENT of the Primary School on a short term basis OPERATING  Other major contracts of the District are 5 year terms AGREEMETNS-  It was stated that in no way that the decision to change the agreement PRIMARY SCHOOL term from 5 years to 3 years was meant to reflect negatively on the CON’T either anchor tenant  Mayor Fielding explained his position on calling a special meeting – reconsideration of an item is the Mayor’s prerogative and the Community Charter states that the meeting should happen as soon as possible  Incoming council will have every opportunity at any point of their term to bring up issues of the agreements, as well as during the annual budget review

MOVED by Councillor Moberg, SECONDED by Councillor Schierbeck:

SC-04/17/13-002 THAT the Management and Operating Agreements with the Okanagan Boys & Girls Club and with the Peachland Chamber of Commerce for the Primary School, includes an additional 5 year renewable option

CARRIED. Councillor Hall OPPOSED.

MOVED by Councillor Schierbeck, SECONDED by Councillor Condon:

SC-04/17/13-003 THAT Council approve entering into the Management and Operating Agreement with the Okanagan Boys and Girls Club, replacing the current agreement which expires December 31, 2013 for a period of five years; and

THAT Council approves entering into the Management and Operating Agreement with the Peachland Chamber of Commerce, subject to finalizing the annual compensation for a period of five years. CARRIED. Councillor Hall OPPOSED.

ADJOURNMENT

MOVED by Councillor Moberg:

SC-04/09/13-004 THAT the Special Council Meeting be adjourned at 9:26 a.m.

Certified Correct. Mayor Corporate Officer

Dated at Peachland, B.C.

This ______day of ______, 2013.

Special Council Meeting held April 17, 2013 Page 16 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 7.A.

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND

Committee of the Whole Meeting Minutes Held Tuesday, April 9, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. In the Council Chambers – Community Centre

PRESENT: Mayor Fielding, Councillors Condon, Fortin, Hall, Kerbes, Moberg and Schierbeck

CAO Elsie Lemke Corporate Officer Polly Palmer Director of Planning Dave Smith Director of Community Services Cheryl Wiebe

Members of the Public Members of the Media

ABSENT:

CALL TO ORDER Mayor Fielding called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.

AMENDMENTS TO Nil AGENDA

APPROVAL OF THE MOVED by Councillor Schierbeck: AGENDA COTW-04/09/13-001 THAT the agenda for the April 9, 2013 COTW Meeting be approved as presented. CARRIED.

PRESENTATIONS AND DELEGATIONS

Nil

ADOPTION OF MINUTES

COTW MEETING MOVED by Councillor Condon: MINUTES OF MARCH 26TH, 2013 COTW-04/09/13-002 THAT the minutes of the COTW meeting held March 26, 2013 be adopted as circulated CARRIED.

REPORTS / DISCUSSION

PADDLE FEST The Director of Community Services, Cheryl Wiebe presented a report COMMUNITY regarding the community event Paddle Fest request for gratis use of the EVENT Community Centre, Cousins Park, Swim Bay and related pathways and equipment

It was noted that there will only be demonstration boats in swim bay and it should not impact the swim area

Minutes to be received for information: COTW Meeting held Ap... Page 17 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 7.A. COTW Meeting Minutes April 9, 2013 Page 2

MOVED by Councillor Condon:

COTW-04/09/13-003 THAT COTW recommends that Council approve the request from Paddle Fest for gratis use of the Community Centre, Cousins Park, Swim Bay and related pathways and equipment, for their August 11, 2013 event CARRIED.

ROYAL CANADIAN The Director of Community Services, Cheryl Wiebe presented a report LEGION regarding the Royal Canadian Legion request for gratis rental of tables and chairs and road closure fees

Discussion ensued relative to:  the Legion organizers are aware that they are allowed to only take as many tables and chairs as requested, and that they are responsible for picking up the tables and chairs

MOVED by Councillor Condon:

COTW-04/09/13-004 THAT COTW recommend Council approve the request from The Royal Canadian Legion for gratis use of tables and chairs and road closure fees for their May 19, 2013 beer gardens and street dance CARRIED.

HEALTHY Director of Community Services, Cheryl Wiebe presented a report regarding a COMMUNITIES partnership with Interior Health on the Healthy Community initiative INITIATIVE MOVED by Councillor Condon:

COTW-04/09/13-005 THAT COTW recommend Council direct staff to work in partnership with Interior Health on the Healthy Way Community Initiative:

AND FURTHER THAT the District of Peachland is committed to develop and maintain a long term partnership with Interior health Authority geared toward improving the health o the citizens of Peachland through:

 Collaboration on policy development, environmental change and grant opportunities that are related both to the District of Peachland strategic priorities and the Interior Health Authority 5 pillars of health (physical, activity, healthy eating, tobacco reduction, healthy built environments and priority populations);  Building community capacity through the recreation department and community partners (such as the Peachland Wellness Centre, the Peachland and District Retirement Society and service groups) to create environments that enable people to live healthier lives;  Support community level strategies and actions plans to address Peachland’s health and wellbeing; and  Promotion of a healthy community. CARRIED.

CIVIC AWARDS Director of Community Services, Cheryl Wiebe presented a report in respect to

Minutes to be received for information: COTW Meeting held Ap... Page 18 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 7.A. COTW Meeting Minutes April 9, 2013 Page 3 POLICY PUB-040 changing the parameters surrounding the various Municipal Awards AMENDMENT categories. It was noted that:  the amendments will update the policy to reflect historical practices  Citizen of the Year nominations will not be considered posthumously  Citizen of the Year nominations will be considered for a Peachland individual or couple, however it is only one award  Unsung Hero nominations will not be considered for individuals who have been in receipt of a previous Municipal Award

MOVED by Councillor Schierbeck:

COTW-04/09/13-006 THAT COTW recommends that Council approve the amendments to the municipal awards policy PUB-040 as attached to the staff report dated April 2, 2013. CARRIED.

SIDEWALK AND Director of Planning and Development Services, Dave Smith presented a RIGHT AWAY report in respect to changing the permitted timelines for the annual setup and OCCUPANCY usage of Seasonal Sidewalk Patios POLICY PRO-267 AMENDMENT Discussion ensued relative to:  Seasonal sidewalk patios opening April 1st upon approval of the Director of Operations  Street sweeping and line painting must be completed before the construction of sidewalk patios are approved  The possibility of Mobile Vendors being able to start up early  To provide the same starting provisions for Mobile Vendors would require a bylaw amendment

MOVED by Councillor Hall:

COTW-04/09/13-007 THAT COTW recommend that Council amend Schedule “A” of the Sidewalk and Right of Way Policy PRO-267 by replacing the “May 1st” start up date with “April 1st”, subject to the start date being approved by the Director of Operations CARRIED.

MOVED by Councillor Schierbeck:

COTW-04/09/13-008 THAT COTW recommends that Council direct staff to bring back an amended bylaw for next season 2014 to permit mobile vendors and food vendors to start up April 1 upon the approval of the Director of Operations

CARRIED.

SITE Director of Planning and Development Services, Dave Smith presented a PREPARATION report with options for different approaches to site preparation practices for PRACTICES FOR new developments. The report was requested by COTW with reference to the NEW site grading and tree removal that took place at the Lakeview subdivision DEVELOPMENTS adjacent to Victoria Street

Minutes to be received for information: COTW Meeting held Ap... Page 19 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 7.A. COTW Meeting Minutes April 9, 2013 Page 4

Discussion ensued relative to:  Sewer, underground wiring and services requires tree removal  Steep sloped areas are difficult to develop without removing trees  The requirement of landscaping after the development is built

MOVED by Councillor Condon:

COTW-04/09/13-009 THAT COTW recommends that Council request staff to include in the Terms of Reference for the Development Application Review Process, a review and recommendation of how to minimize the impact of site preparation on lands proposed for development CARRIED.

OTHER BUSINESS

ADJOURNMENT

MOVED by Councillor Moberg:

COTW-04/09/13-010 THAT the COTW meeting be adjourned at 9:50 a.m.

Certified Correct. Mayor Corporate Officer

Dated at Peachland, B.C.

This ______day of ______, ______.

Minutes to be received for information: COTW Meeting held Ap... Page 20 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 7.A.

Peachland Economic Development Committee

Minutes of Meeting held on

March 14, 2013

Present: Moe Martin, Rob Campbell, Darci Yeo, Councilor Cindy Fortin,Dave Stuart, Councilor P. Schierbeck, Gabi Haas,Tony Chadwick

Regrets: Terry Tanner, Steve Alison, Ted Worobetz, Chris Byrd

1. Call to Order Chairman Gabi Haas called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m.

2. Adoption of Agenda There were no changes or additions to the agenda as presented. Motion: That the agenda be accepted. Moved by: Peter Schierbeck Carried

3. Adoption of February 7, 2013 Minutes Moved by: Moe Martin Carried

4. Business Arising from the Minutes 4.a Letter from CAO Elsie Lemke re Chamber and Committees of Council Due to duplication of effort, role confusion and limited financial and human resources the COTW passed the following resolution on February 28th: “That the Chamber of Commerce working collaboratively with the PEDC and the Tourism Advisory Committee be asked to seek models that will deal effectively with duplication of effort to enhance efficiency, coordination and communication and improve resourcing capacity and present their findings and recommendations to Council by September 30th, 2013.”

Councilor Schierbeck indicated committee leaders had consulted with the CAO regarding resources and there was a need to understand from other jurisdictions how this issue was addressed (Summerland for example has a combination of committees but are independent). Council agreed to provide staff support to research models in other communities and to provide this information to the PEDC, the Chamber of Commerce and the Tourism Committee. A discussion followed on business licences. Rob Campbell stated there were 400 businesses in Peachland but not all were licenced and as funding models are based on this potential revenue is being lost.

Minutes to be received for information: COTW Meeting held Ap... Page 21 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 7.A.

Motion: That PEDC support the District of Peachland in enforcing the business licence by-law: Moved by: Darci Yeo Carried.

5 New Business

5.a Kamloops Economic Development Conference Councilor Peter Shierbeck attended the conference highlighting the following learning points: • Advantages of using social media. • Economic development to include tourism. • SPOTS (Strategic Plan on the Shelf) keep it front of you. • Agri-business opportunities. • Develop strategies for business retention and expansion. • Make use of Opportunities BC website. • Develop an available land inventory. • Consider by-law changes to facilitate businesses. • Reduce red tape e.g. has reduced time required to get relevant permits from 6 months down to 2 weeks. • Incorporate PEDC website with District of Peachland website. • Remove negative signage (signage needs to be inviting). • Install way-finding signs

After further discussion the following points emerged: • There is some duplication of effort relating to the Tourism Advisory Committee and the Tourist Information Centre. • Economic development in Peachland will essentially be tourism based. • If committees amalgamate it was suggested that council representatives be ex-officio in order to keep committee at a manageable size. • First step would be to merge Tourism Advisory and PEDC followed by a review and possible models of the relationship between the Chamber and PEDC.

Additional discussion once again bought up the issue of available land for commercial and /or industrial development in Peachland. Moe Martin reported that his earlier survey confirmed that their is no suitable land zoned for commercial or light industrial in Peachland other than some that is within the ALR and therefore not available. Peter Schierbeck noted that the downtown RTE is zoned commercial including residential houses to 6th st. Motion: That PEDC requests the District of Peachland to carry out a land inventory survey of available commercial and light industrial land (if indeed available) and post it on the District website. Moved by: Gabi Haas Carried

5.b Zoning By-Law Workshop

Minutes to be received for information: COTW Meeting held Ap... Page 22 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 7.A.

There is a requirement that by-laws, particularly zoning, require revision to assist in attracting suitable developments and making it generally easier to conduct business in Peachland. Dave Stuart reported that Urban Systems have been retained to collect third party (developers, concerned citizens etc) input. Peter Schierbeck agreed to identify who took notes of the initial meeting and table them at a future PEDC meeting for discussion.

5.c Community Amenity Contribution Charges Moe Martin reported back on his survey of other communities as to their comparable charges. It was noted that no local jurisdictions have a by-law or policy regarding Amenities Charges in place (see Appendix 1). After further discussion it was agreed that the Amenities Charge was detrimental to attracting the downtown development of Peachland, however it should be recognized there maybe some flexibility in that it is a policy and not a by-law and can it only be changed following re-zoning of a property. Motion: That the PEDC and Chamber of Commerce recommend that council amend the Amenities Charge Policy to exempt commercial structures within the RTE area. Moved by: Rob Cambell Carried Against: Cindy Fortin

4.d Letter to Support Application for BC Recreation and Parks Award PEDC supports District of Peachlandʼs nomination submitting the Centennial Pathway project for this award.

6. Reports

a) District Council Peter Schierbeck reported on the new way-finding sign initiative and presented samples for comment. The initial budget of $10,000 is to be recovered from participating businesses. The District is to provide three gateway signs. Motion: That PEDC request the District of Peachland install scenic route signage to Beach Avenue be incorporated in the way-finding sign project. Moved by:Darci Yeo Carried

b) Chamber of Commerce Rob Campbell reported on progress on the Primary School renovation project. The objective is to have the front half of the building completed by Victoria Day weekend. Regarding the new signage initiative notification is to be sent to all business, tourism related or not, that signs can be available for $110 each.

c) Arts Council No report.

d) Tourism Advisory Committee No report.

Minutes to be received for information: COTW Meeting held Ap... Page 23 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 7.A.

Next Meeting: April 11, 2013 at 6:30 p.m.

Motion for Adjournment Moved by: Cindy Fortin Carried

Meeting adjourned 8:20 p.m.

Minutes to be received for information: COTW Meeting held Ap... Page 24 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 7.A.

APPENDIX

Amenities Charges - Comparison to Other Communities

City of Penticton Contact:Colleen Pennington - Economic Development Officer • Do not have a Community Amenity Contributions (CAC) bylaw / policy. • They are presently reviewing their Development Cost Charges (DCC) and Building Permit Charges. • Have been trying to cover amenities cost through their DCCs. • Indicated an interest in our findings.

District of Summerland Contact: Ian Macintosh - Director Development Services • Do not have a CAC bylaw / policy. • Fees it isnʼt a legal entity. • They review and negotiate CACs for larger developments on an individual basis that will have an impact on the community. They do not have a set formulae. • They do not charge for smaller developments.

District of West Kelowna Contact: John Perrott - Business Development Officer • Do not have a CAC bylaw / policy. • Have been trying for some time to formulate something but have nothing put together yet.

City of Kelowna Contact: Theresa Eichler - Planning Department • Do not have a CAC bylaw / policy. • They review and negotiate CACs for larger developments on an individual basis. • They do not have a problem with developers from Vancouver, Calgary etc. but have difficulty with local developers. • They have worked on this for years but find it is impossible to make one “size fits all” because of their separate communities and different DCCs and amenity requirements in them.

Peachland “Community Amenity Contribution Policy” effective January 22, 2013.

https://peachland.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentList.aspx?ID=27569

Minutes to be received for information: COTW Meeting held Ap... Page 25 of 181 Page 26 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 7.B.

Committee of the Whole Summary

The following motions were passed at a Committee of the Whole meeting. The Resolutions that need to be adopted are marked with “Action”, otherwise the resolution is for information only.

FOR DATE RESOLUTION INFORMATION OR OF ACTION MEETING

THAT Council direct staff to work in partnership with Interior Health on the Healthy Way Community Initiative:

AND FURTHER THAT the District of Peachland is committed to develop and maintain a long term partnership with Interior health Authority geared toward improving the health o the citizens of Peachland through:

 Collaboration on policy development, environmental change and grant opportunities that are related both to the District of Peachland strategic priorities and the Action April 9, 2013 Interior Health Authority 5 pillars of health (physical, activity, healthy eating, tobacco reduction, healthy built environments and priority populations);  Building community capacity through the recreation department and community partners (such as the Peachland Wellness Centre, the Peachland and District Retirement Society and service groups) to create environments that enable people to live healthier lives;  Support community level strategies and actions plans to address Peachland’s health and wellbeing; and  Promotion of a healthy community.

THAT Council request staff to include in the Terms of Reference for the Development Application Review Process, a review and Action April 9, 2013 recommendation of how to minimize the impact of site preparation on lands proposed for development.

Committee of the Whole Summary Page 27 of 181 Page 28 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.A.

District of Peachland Request for Decision

To: Mayor & Council From: Doug Pryde, Director of Finance Date: April 16, 2013 Subject: 2013 Financial Plan Recommendation: THAT Council gives three readings to 2013 Financial Plan Bylaw Number 2051, 2013.

Chief Administrative Officer’s Comments:

I support the recommendations:______

Implications of Recommendation:

General: N/A

Organizational: N/A

Financial: The proposed Financial Plan has minor tax impacts as a result of a healthy surplus in 2012, additional revenue generated by new construction assessment, and maintaining low reserve contributions in 2013. The Committee of the Whole through the budget deliberation process approved a 2.8 percent increase in general municipal property taxes for the average single family dwelling. This increase does not account for the large funding shortfall in reserve contributions required to fund the replacement of tangible capital assets within the District. This funding shortfall will be defined once the asset management plan is completed and presented to Council in 2013 for additional reserve funding consideration in the 2014 Financial Plan. This year is the first full year the District is responsible for directly funding policing services. Total 2013 policing costs in the amount of $606,655 includes four RCMP members, shared accommodation costs with the District of West Kelowna, prisoner expense shared with the City of Kelowna, equivalent to one support staff shared with the District of West Kelowna and the City of Kelowna, and a shared liaison officer. In order to mitigate the tax burden on policing, the District has budgeted a $288,573 contribution from the Policing Reserve Fund to offset policing costs. The portion of policing funded from taxation amounts to $318,082 which converts to a 2.1 percent increase in taxation to the average single family dwelling who will pay an estimated $26.13 in additional policing tax.

Financial Plan Bylaw No. 2051, 2013 Page 29 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.A.

The District of Peachland Water Master Plan identifies water capital improvements in the amount of $44,900,866 over a 17-year period. Considering development cost charge and grant funding, the District’s portion of these costs amounts to approximately $18,044,251. The District will also be responsible for approximately $3,000,000 in ongoing replacement work. On February 26, 2013, the Committee of the Whole approved a $25 increase in the Water Improvement parcel tax assessment from $300 to $325 to fund the District’s portion of the Water Master Plan construction. Effective April 1, 2013, the District is responsible for transit services estimated to cost $120,000 in 2013. This function was recently transferred from the Regional District. Therefore, the tax levy is transferred from collections from other governments to a District levy with little tax impact associated with an additional $8,000 budgeted for increased transit services to be implemented towards the end of this year. Some of the major projects identified in the 2013 capital plan include the completion of the Primary School upgrades in the amount of $339,287 funded by grants from the provincial Community Recreation Fund and the federal Enabling Accessibility Fund, and the implementation of the sidewalk master plan including sidewalk construction identified in this plan costing $377,000 funded from federal gas tax funds available for sustainable projects. The most significant water capital project includes the gravity trunk Ponderosa Interconnection project costing $1,541,038 funded entirely from the Ponderosa development. Strategic Plan: N/A

BACKGROUND: The Committee of the Whole met on January 8th and 22th, February 5th, 12th and 26th, March 12th and 26th to review in detail the operating budget, civic grant approvals, and capital works priorities. The 2013 Financial Plan will be presented in greater detail at the Regular Meeting of Council on April 23rd when an opportunity will be available for the residents of Peachland to express an opinion on the District’s Financial Plan.

REPORT/DOCUMENT: Attached: X Available: Nil:

2013 Financial Plan Bylaw Number 2051, 2013.

OPTIONS: 1. COUNCIL COULD CHOOSE TO SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION. 2. COUNCIL COULD CHOOSE TO NOT SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION. 3. COUNCIL COULD CHOOSE TO REFER THIS BYLAW TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE.

Financial Plan Bylaw No. 2051, 2013 Page 30 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.A.

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND

BYLAW NUMBER 2051

A Bylaw to Adopt the Financial Plan for The Corporation of the District of Peachland for the Current year, 2013 ______

WHEREAS Section 165(1) of the Community Charter provides that the Financial Plan shall, by bylaw, be adopted before the Annual Property Tax Bylaw is adopted;

AND WHEREAS the said Financial Plan for the year 2013 is appended hereto as Schedules ‘A,’ ‘B’ and ‘C;’

NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the District of Peachland, in open meeting assembled, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. That Schedules ‘A,’ ‘B’ and ‘C’ shall be the Financial Plan of the Corporation of the District of Peachland for the year 2013 and form an integral part of this Bylaw;

2. This Bylaw may be cited as ‘The Corporation of the District of Peachland Financial Plan Bylaw Number 2051, 2013.’

READ A FIRST TIME, this day of, 2013.

READ A SECOND TIME, this day of , 2013.

READ A THIRD TIME, this day of , 2013.

FINALLY RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED, this day of 2013.

______Mayor Corporate Officer

Dated at Peachland, B. C. This day of , 2013

Financial Plan Bylaw No. 2051, 2013 Page 31 of 181 Page 32 of 181 Financial PlanBylaw No.2051,2013

Schedule "A" Attached to and forming Part of Bylaw 2051, 2013 District of Peachland 2013 Financial Plan 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Revenues Property Taxes 3,909,072 4,049,429 4,244,040 4,530,752 4,595,510 21,328,803 Parcel Taxes 1,276,365 1,345,841 1,345,841 1,345,842 1,345,842 6,659,731 Concessions & Franchise 133,921 136,600 139,332 142,118 144,960 696,931 Sale of Services 615,284 627,590 640,143 652,945 666,004 3,201,966 User Fees 1,340,510 1,366,865 1,393,748 1,421,171 1,449,143 6,971,437 Borrowing Proceeds 0 0 2,098,876 0 0 2,098,876 Donations and Contributions 1,595,766 0 0 0 0 1,595,766 Other Revenue from Own Sources 535,108 479,183 483,341 487,585 491,909 2,477,126 Transfers from Other Governments 1,561,272 2,848,318 752,985 752,985 752,985 6,668,545 Transfers from DCC Reserve Funds 27,441 4,279,991 1,937,424 0 0 6,244,856 Transfers from Non-DCC Reserve Fund9s33,753 7,048,093 168,110 79,946 79,946 8,309,848 Transfers from Surplus 367,386 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,567,386

12,295,878 22,481,910 13,503,840 9,713,344 9,826,299 67,821,271 Expenditures

General Fund 5,918,017 5,939,164 6,050,942 6,133,643 6,218,626 30,260,392 Water System #1 Fund 710,098 722,867 735,895 749,182 762,729 3,680,771 Sewer System 521,073 531,448 542,030 552,823 563,833 2,711,207

Debt Interest 363,413 362,761 362,724 447,107 447,107 1,983,112 AGENDA ITEM#8.A. Debt Principal 229,151 191,550 178,833 230,130 230,130 1,059,794 Capital Expenditure 3,288,835 13,556,207 4,452,230 415,930 415,930 22,129,132 Page 33 of181 Transfer to Reserve Funds 1,265,291 1,177,913 1,181,186 1,184,529 1,187,944 5,996,863

12,295,878 22,481,910 13,503,840 9,713,344 9,826,299 67,821,271 Page 34 of 181 Financial PlanBylaw No.2051,2013

5  t     C   t  {     h     t  {  .  .  ! "# 

L  {     / /   5     t                 !       " "    "#

 Ç       !   %  %    "       {   &&  / /   ' Ç         ( )  % "   (     Ç    %  ! ) ) %  

C$ {  Ç            !        %   "   '*'

h • h!  %     %   (,       ( )         "         !    !  %       " 

t  • a " %    ( )  (  " .  ( )   !    " ( "  "! %  "    " "         !  • 9      "         "          "   !    %    

% !  AGENDA ITEM#8.A. • Ü  !    %  "                       "  • í     5      !   %   !   %       "     )      Page 35 of181      %    ( )  

5  t%  Ç '  Ç  '             ( )  %"   (   Ç        (  !   "       ( )  !   Ç         % "      %    %  %  (  5     !  

Financial PlanBylaw No.2051,2013

h • a             ( )  %"   (        !    !      ( 

t  • ! "       )   %"   (      %  "  %% ( Ç  %      (      " ) %    %   ( /       "  )  (  Ç ) %     !    ( /  (

t   Ç ' 9'  % Ç          %  ! ) ) %  Ç 5      )  "  %  ! ) ) %   (  "   %      !   %  ! ) ) %  Ç  "  (      %  ! ) ) %          (   "# • t!               4 • t!       "%    4 • t!   "%  5      ( (             "4 • t  !   " %   %% (   4 • t  !   ! %  ( " (  "      %% (4 • h       "%      % %% (      !   5   4 • h   !        %     %   (4 • 9)            !  6    4  • { )        %%    ! %  "  t     (     

h • Ç 5        !   %  ! ) ) %   .              )  "

 %  ! ) ) %   (4 AGENDA ITEM#8.A. • Ç  )        %%    ! %  "  t     (    4  • Ç "   ! %   " "  "        " Page 36 of181 t  • t %  ! ) ) %        "  !   #       (     %         !   5    4   !             4       !   ( 5     • w !  6  ) ) %        "   ! %   t  ,    

Financial PlanBylaw No.2051,2013

Schedule "B" (continued) Attached to and forming Part of Bylaw 2051, 2013

District of Peachland 2013 Financial Plan

Table 1: 2013 Sources of Revenue Class Amount Percentage Property Taxes 3,909,072 31.7% Parcel Taxes 1,276,365 10.4% Concessions & Franchise 133,921 1.1% Sale of Services 615,284 5.0% User Fees 1,340,510 10.9% Borrowing Proceeds 0 0.0% Donations and Contributions 1,595,766 13.0% Other Revenue from Own Sources 535,108 4.4% Transfers from Other Governments 1,561,272 12.7% Transfers from DCC Reserve Funds 27,441 0.2% Transfers from Non-DCC Reserve Funds 933,753 7.6% Transfers from Surplus 367,386 3.0% Total 12,295,878 100.0%

Table 2: Distribution of 2013 Property Taxes Class General Policing Transit Total Percentage

Residential 3,213,018 294,440 111,078 3,618,536 92.6% AGENDA ITEM#8.A. Utilities 18,646 1,709 645 21,000 0.5%

Page 37 of181 Light Industry 15,162 1,389 524 17,075 0.4% Commercial/Business 170,162 15,594 5,885 191,641 4.9% Seasonal/Recreational 52,705 4,831 1,823 59,359 1.5% Farm 1,297 119 45 1,461 0.1% Total 3,470,990 318,082 120,000 3,909,072 100.0% Page 38 of 181 Financial PlanBylaw No.2051,2013

Schedule 'B' (continued) Attached to and forming part of Bylaw 2051, 2013 Table 3: 2013 Permissive Tax Exemptions

CC Exempt Exempt Term Sec. Occupied By Use of Permissive Tax Exemption Land Improvements (years)

220(1)(h) & 224(2)(f) Peachland United Church For public worship 100% 100% N/A 220(1)(h) & 224(2)(f) St. Margaret's Anglican Church For public worship 100% 100% N/A 220(1)(h) & 224(2)(f) Peachland Baptist Church For public worship 100% 100% N/A 224(2)(b) Peachland Wellness Centre A centre to facilitate the quality of life for groups 100% 100% 1 and individuals residing in Peachland 224(2)(e) Peachland Riding Club Not-for-profit horse riding facility 24% 100% 1 224(2)(b) Peachland Community Policing Office Community crime prevention 100% 100% 1 224(2)(b) Peachland Chamber of Commerce A centre to promote of tourism within Peachland 21% Note 'A' 1 224(2)(b) Peachland District Retirement Society A centre to promote activities for seniors 100% 100% 1 224(2)(a) Maple Springs Bible Camp Bible camp 99% Note 'B' 1 224(2)(a) The Nature Trust of BC Protection of land to conserve biodiversity 100% N/A 1 Peachland Branch of the Royal A centre to promote charitable fundraising 224(2)(a) Canadian Legion Branch 69 events 78% 66% 1

Note 'A' - 100% of the improvement value of the Chamber of Commerce.

Note 'B' - 100% of the improvement value less 100% of the residential premises with garage. AGENDA ITEM#8.A. Page 39 of181 Page 40 of 181 Financial PlanBylaw No.2051,2013

Schedule "C" Attached to and forming Part of Bylaw 2051, 2013 District of Peachland 2013 Financial Plan 20 Year Capital Plan

Funding DCC Non-DCC Non-Stat Donations & Code Description Year Cost Current Reserve Reserve Reserve Borrowing Grant Contributions General Fund DCC Roads RDS Princeton Corridor Report 2013 37,841 18,164 19,677 37,841 0 18,164 19,677 0 0 0 0 Non-DCC Roads and Storm Drains RDS Highway Entrance Signs 2013 12,275 12,275 RDS Road Rehabilitation Program 2013 141,200 141,200 RDS Storm Water Infrastructure Improvements 2013 37,019 37,019 RDS Landscaping Infrastructure Construction by Treegroup 2013 50,000 50,000 RDS Storm Water Infrastructure Improvements 2013 50,000 50,000 RDS Pierce Street & Pierce Place Road Rehabilitation 2013 96,320 96,320 RDS Digital Driver Feedback Sign (subject to grant funding from ICBC) 2013 10,000 5,000 5,000 RDS LED Street Lights 2013 77,265 77,265 474,079 82,265 0 336,814 0 0 5,000 50,000 Equipment EQUIP Trailers and Mower 2013 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 Facilities FAC Fire Hall Concept 2013 35,000 35,000 FAC Webcasting of District Meetings 2013 10,000 10,000 FAC Primary School Upgrade 2013 339,287 339,287 FAC Community Centre Upgrades 2013 55,000 55,000 AGENDA ITEM#8.A. FAC Public Works Building Repair 2013 50,000 50,000 489,287 150,000 0 0 0 0 339,287 0

FPage 41 of181 ire Department EQUIP Computer Aided Dispatch 2013 10,680 10,680 EQUIP WASP Interface Fire Protection System 2013 24,700 24,700 35,380 0 0 35,380 0 0 0 0

Page 1 Financial PlanBylaw No.2051,2013

Funding DCC Non-DCC Non-Stat Donations & Code Description Year Cost Current Reserve Reserve Reserve Borrowing Grant Contributions Parks PARK Downtown Garbage and Recycling Containers 2013 12,046 12,046 PARK Walkway Ponderosa to Clements 2013 60,000 60,000 PARK Repair of Waterfront Infrastructure 2013 7,757 7,757 PARK Skate and Bike Park 2013 10,000 5,272 4,728 PARK Repair of Waterfront infrastructure 2013 27,000 27,000 PARK Implementation of Sidewalk Master Plan 2013 377,000 377,000 493,803 27,000 0 25,075 0 0 437,000 4,728 Total 2013 Capital 1,571,390 270,265 18,164 446,946 0 0 781,287 54,728

2014 Capital DCC Roads DCC-RDS Turner/Princeton Intersection Upgrade 2014 350,400 168,192 182,208 DCC-RDS 13th Street Upgrade 2014 333,450 160,056 173,394 DCC-RDS Princeton Avenue Upgrade - Ellison to Turner 2014 1,332,500 639,600 692,900 2,016,350 0 967,848 1,048,502 0 0 0 0 Non-DCC Roads and Storm Drains RDS Road Replacement Program 2014 337,430 337,430 337,430 337,430 0 0 0 0 0 0 Public Works Equipment EQUIP Public Works Equipment - Pickup 2014 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 Facilities FAC Building Improvements 2014 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Financial Services and Information Technology I Computer Replacement Program 2014 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recreation REC Recreation Equipment Replacement 2014 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2014 Capital 2,432,280 365,930 967,848 1,098,502 0 0 0 0 AGENDA ITEM#8.A. Page 42 of181

Page 2 Financial PlanBylaw No.2051,2013

Funding DCC Non-DCC Non-Stat Donations & Code Description Year Cost Current Reserve Reserve Reserve Borrowing Grant Contributions 2015 Capital DCC Roads DCC-RDS Princeton Avenue - Design and Construction - Hwy 97 to Ellison 2015 3,750,750 0 1,800,360 1,950,390 DCC-RDS Somerset/Princeton intersection Upgrade 2015 285,550 137,064 148,486 4,036,300 0 1,937,424 0 0 2,098,876 0 0 Non-DCC Roads and Storm Drains RDS Road Replacement Program 2015 337,430 337,430 337,430 337,430 0 0 0 0 0 0 Public Works Equipment EQUIP Public Works Equipment - Pickup 2015 50,000 0 50,000 50,000 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 Facilities FAC Building Improvements 2015 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Financial Services and Information Technology I Computer Replacement Program 2015 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recreation REC Recreation Equipment Replacement 2015 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2015 Capital 4,452,230 365,930 1,937,424 50,000 0 2,098,876 0 0 2016 Capital Non-DCC Roads and Storm Drains RDS Road Replacement Program 2016 337,430 337,430 337,430 337,430 0 0 0 0 0 0 Public Works Equipment EQUIP Public Works Equipment - Pickup 2016 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 Facilities FAC Building Improvements 2016 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 AGENDA ITEM#8.A. Page 43 of181

Page 3 Financial PlanBylaw No.2051,2013

Funding DCC Non-DCC Non-Stat Donations & Code Description Year Cost Current Reserve Reserve Reserve Borrowing Grant Contributions Financial Services and Information Technology I Computer Replacement Program 2016 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recreation REC Recreation Equipment Replacement 2016 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2016 Capital 415,930 365,930 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 2017 Capital Non-DCC Roads and Storm Drains RDS Road Replacement Program 2017 337,430 337,430 337,430 337,430 0 0 0 0 0 0 Public Works Equipment EQUIP Public Works Equipment - Pickup 2017 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 Facilities FAC Building Improvements 2017 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Financial Services and Information Technology I Computer Replacement Program 2017 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recreation REC Recreation Equipment Replacement 2017 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2017 Capital 415,930 365,930 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 Five Year Plan Total 9,287,760 1,733,985 2,923,436 1,695,448 0 2,098,876 781,287 54,728 2018 to 2022 Capital DCC Roads DCC-RDS Beach Avenue - Design and Construction - 13th to Todd Road 2018-2022 1,115,125 535,260 579,865 DCC-RDS Renfrew Road Upgrade 2018-2022 2,316,725 1,112,028 1,204,697 DCC-RDS Hardy Street Upgrade 2018-2022 348,450 167,256 181,194

DCC-RDS Cousins Road Upgrade 2018-2022 193,750 93,000 100,750 AGENDA ITEM#8.A. 3,974,050 0 1,907,544 1,486,641 0 0 579,865 0 Public Works Equipment EQUIP Public Works Equipment 2018-2022 300,000 300,000 Page 44 of181 300,000 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 4 Financial PlanBylaw No.2051,2013

Funding DCC Non-DCC Non-Stat Donations & Code Description Year Cost Current Reserve Reserve Reserve Borrowing Grant Contributions Fire Department FIRE Engine 21 Replacement 2018-2022 500,000 500,000 0 55,000 55,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parks DCC-PARKS Beach Avenue Waterfront Pathway - 13th Street to Todd Road 2018-2022 1,115,125 535,260 0 579,865 DCC-PARKS MacKinnon Park Improvements (total 1.93 ha) - based on baseball fields 2018-2022 500,000 260,000 240,000 1,615,125 260,000 775,260 0 0 0 579,865 0 Recreation REC Recreation Equipment Replacement 2018-2022 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2018-2022 Capital 6,466,675 637,500 2,682,804 1,986,641 0 0 1,159,730 0 2023 to 2032 Capital Public Works Equipment EQUIP Public Works Equipment 2023-2032 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fire Department FIRE Satellite Fire Hall Servicing Boundary Expansion 2023-2032 400,000 400,000 0 400,000 0 0 400,000 0 0 0 0 Financial Services and Information Technology I Computer Replacement Program 2023-2032 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parks PARK Water Park 2023-2032 100,000 100,000 PARK 13th Street Pier 2023-2032 100,000 100,000 PARK 3rd Street Pier 2023-2032 100,000 100,000 300,000 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recreation REC Recreation Equipment Replacement 2023-2032 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2023-2032 Capital 1,445,000 1,045,000 0 400,000 0 0 0 0 Grand Total - 20-Year Capital 17,199,435 3,416,485 5,606,240 4,082,089 0 2,098,876 1,941,017 54,728 AGENDA ITEM#8.A. Page 45 of181

Page 5 Financial PlanBylaw No.2051,2013

Funding DCC Non-DCC Non-Stat Donations & Code Description Year Cost Current Reserve Reserve Reserve Borrowing Grant Contributions

Water System Capital 2013 Capital DCC Water System One DCC-WS1 Gravity Trunk - Ponderosa Interconnection - Pipes 2013 1,541,038 0 1,541,038 DCC-WS1 Conceptual Site Plan and Terms of Reference - Cousins Road Reservoir 2013 27,832 9,277 18,555 1,568,870 0 9,277 18,555 0 0 0 1,541,038 Non-DCC Water System One WS1 Water Line/Service Replacements (including $18,575 carry forward) 2013 68,575 68,575 WS1 PRV Replacement - Coldham 2013 80,000 80,000 148,575 0 0 148,575 0 0 0 0 Total 2013 Capital 1,717,445 0 9,277 167,130 0 0 0 1,541,038

DCC-WS1 Increased Treated Water Storage (Subject to Grant Approval) 2014 3,143,000 523,834 523,833 2,095,333 DCC-WS1 Trepanier Reservoir (Cousins Road) 2014 4,022,427 1,340,809 2,681,618 DCC-WS1 Low Lift Pump Station 2014 1,350,000 450,000 900,000 DCC-WS1 Upper Ponderosa Tank 2014 2,416,500 805,500 1,611,000 Total 2014 Capital 10,931,927 0 3,120,143 5,716,451 0 0 2,095,333 0 Five-Year Total 12,649,372 0 3,129,420 5,883,581 0 0 2,095,333 1,541,038 2018 to 2022 Capital Water System One DCC-WS1 Peachland Creek Treatment Plant 2018-2022 16,875,000 6,075,000 3,600,000 7,200,000 Ongoing Replacement Work 2018-2022 1,000,000 1,000,000 Total 2018-2022 Capital 17,875,000 0 6,075,000 4,600,000 0 0 7,200,000 0 2023 to 2032 Capital DCC Water System One DCC-WS1 Gravity Trunk - Peachland Creek to Turner Avenue 2023-2032 4,869,518 1,623,173 3,246,345 DCC-WS1 Replace Pierce Street Booster 2023-2032 675,000 225,000 450,000 DCC-WS1 Gravity Trunk to Trepanier System 2023-2032 2,992,113 997,371 1,994,742 DCC-WS1 Double PRV Station (Ponderosa/Trepanier) 2023-2032 203,000 67,667 135,333 DCC-WS1 Pump House 2023-2032 675,000 225,000 450,000 Ongoing Replacement Work 2023-2032 2,000,000 2,000,000 AGENDA ITEM#8.A. Total 2023-2032 Capital 11,414,631 0 3,138,211 8,276,420 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 41,939,003 0 12,342,631 18,760,001 0 0 9,295,333 1,541,038 Page 46 of181

Page 6 Financial PlanBylaw No.2051,2013

Funding DCC Non-DCC Non-Stat Donations & Code Description Year Cost Current Reserve Reserve Reserve Borrowing Grant Contributions Sewer Capital 2014 Capital DCC Sewer DCC-Sewer Upgrade 50m section of 450mm pipe (between 11th and 12th) 2014 100,000 100,000 DCC-Sewer Upgrade 46m section of 525mm pipe (between Butler and Trepanier) 2014 92,000 92,000 192,000 0 192,000 0 0 0 0 0 Five-Year Total 192,000 0 192,000 0 0 0 0 0 2018 to 2022 Capital Sewer North Princeton 2018-2022 6,300,000 2,100,000 4,200,000 DCC-Sewer Pre Design Study for Flow Equalization 2018-2022 60,000 60,000 DCC-Sewer Provide Flow EQ for Princeton South Area 2018-2022 1,220,000 1,220,000 Total 2018-2022 Capital 7,580,000 0 1,280,000 0 0 2,100,000 4,200,000 0 2023 to 2032 Capital Non-DCC Sewer Sewer Phase 3 2023-2032 12,000,000 4,000,000 8,000,000 Sewer Phase 4 2023-2032 12,000,000 4,000,000 8,000,000 24,000,000 0 0 0 0 8,000,000 16,000,000 0 AGENDA ITEM#8.A. Page 47 of181

Page 7 Page 48 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.B.

District of Peachland Request for Decision

To: Mayor & Council From: Doug Pryde, Director of Finance Date: April 17, 2013 Subject: 2013 Tax Rates Bylaw Recommendation: THAT Council gives three readings to the Corporation of the District of Peachland Tax Rates Bylaw Number 2053, 2013.

Chief Administrative Officer’s Comments:

I support the recommendations:______

Implications of Recommendation:

General: N/A

Organizational: N/A

Financial: The general tax rates reflect a 2.8 percent tax increase to the average single family dwelling who will be paying an additional $32.95 in general municipal taxes in 2013 excluding parcel tax increases. As a result of the new transit assessment explained in the 2013 Financial Plan report, a new tax rate category for transit has been established. Similar to the policing assessment, the transit levy will be shown separately on the tax notice allowing property owners to identify the transit impact on taxation. This year Council approved a further reduction in the business tax multiplier from 1.95 to 1.90 to decrease the tax burden on business owners by increasing taxation to utilities. As a result the utility tax multiplier has increased from 6.44 to 8.4826 transferring $4,500 in taxation from business to utilities with no impact on the residential tax assessment. Strategic Plan: N/A

BACKGROUND: Before May 15th Council must adopt a Tax Rates Bylaw, which establishes the general property tax rates for the current year. This bylaw also includes the tax rates established by other governments.

Tax Rates Bylaw No. 2053, 2013 Page 49 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.B.

REPORT/DOCUMENT: Attached: X Available: Nil:

2013 Tax Rates Bylaw Number 2053, 2013.

OPTIONS: 1. COUNCIL COULD CHOOSE TO SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION. 2. COUNCIL COULD CHOOSE TO NOT SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION. 3. COUNCIL COULD CHOOSE TO REFER THIS BYLAW TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE.

Tax Rates Bylaw No. 2053, 2013 Page 50 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.B.

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND

BYLAW NUMBER 2053

A Bylaw for the Levying of Rates for Municipal, Hospital, Regional District and Other Purposes for The Year 2013 ______

WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the District of Peachland, in Open Meeting assembled, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. The following rates appearing on Schedule ‘A’ attached hereto and forming a part hereof, are hereby levied for the year 2013:

a) For all lawful general purposes of the Municipality on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for general Municipal purposes.

b) For debt purposes on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for general Municipal purposes.

c) For policing purposes on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for general municipal purposes.

d) For transit purposes on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for general Municipal purposes.

e) For purposes of the Central Okanagan Regional District Sterile Insect Release Programme on the assessed value of land taxable for Regional Hospital District purposes.

f) For purposes of the Central Okanagan Regional District on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for Regional Hospital District purposes.

g) For the purposes of the Central Okanagan Regional Hospital District on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for Regional Hospital District purposes.

h) For the purposes of the B.C. Assessment Authority on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for Regional Hospital District purposes.

i) For the purposes of the Municipal Finance Authority of B.C. on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for Regional Hospital District purposes.

j) For the purposes of the Okanagan Regional Library on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for general Municipal purposes.

2. The minimum amount of taxation upon any parcel of land, with or without improvements thereon, shall be the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00.)

3. A percent addition of Ten Percent (10%) will be added to the amount remaining unpaid after the SECOND DAY OF JULY, 2013 AT FOUR O’CLOCK IN THE AFTERNOON (4:00 P.M.) and the amount unpaid, including the percentum additions, will be deemed to be the amount of the current year’s Taxes due and payable upon such Rateable Land and Improvements.

4. If the Rates and Taxes, or any part thereof, due to the Collector for the Corporation of the District of Peachland shall not be paid by the THIRTY-FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2013, the Collector

Tax Rates Bylaw No. 2053, 2013 Page 51 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.B. Tax Rates Bylaw No. 2053 – Page 2

may collect the same in the manner provided in the Community Charter and amendments thereto.

5. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “2013 Tax Rates Bylaw Number 2053, 2013”

READ A FIRST TIME, this day of , 2013.

READ A SECOND TIME, this day of , 2013.

READ A THIRD TIME, this day of , 2013.

FINALLY RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED, this day of , 2013.

______Mayor Corporate Officer

Dated at Peachland, B.C. This day of , 2013.

Tax Rates Bylaw No. 2053, 2013 Page 52 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.B.

Schedule "A" Attached to and forming Part of Bylaw #2053, 2013

Corporation of the District of Peachland 2013 Property Tax Rates

Class 1 Class 2 Class 5 Class 6 Class 8 Class 9 Business/ Recreation/ Residential Utilities Industrial Other Non-Profit Farm

General Municipal Tax Rate Multipliers 1.0000 8.4826 3.5000 1.9000 1.5000 1.0000 Tax Rates: General 2.8492 24.1686 9.9722 5.4135 4.2738 2.8492

Policing 0.2611 2.2148 0.9139 0.4961 0.3917 0.2611

Transit 0.0985 0.8356 0.3448 0.1872 0.1478 0.0985

Regional District 0.3528 1.2349 1.1996 0.8644 0.3528 0.3528

Regional District Sterile Insect 0.0456 0.1595 0.1550 0.1117 0.0456 0.0456

Central Okanagan Regional Hospital District 0.3610 1.2634 1.2273 0.8844 0.3610 0.3610

B.C.A.A. 0.0610 0.5213 0.1811 0.1811 0.0610 0.0610

M.F.A. 0.0002 0.0007 0.0007 0.0005 0.0002 0.0002

Regional Library 0.1807 1.5330 0.6325 0.3434 0.2711 0.1807

Tax Rates Bylaw No. 2053, 2013 Page 53 of 181 Page 54 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.C.

District of Peachland Request for Decision

To: Mayor & Council From: Doug Pryde, Director of Finance Date: April 17, 2013 Subject: 2013 Parcel Tax Bylaws Recommendation: THAT Council gives three readings to the 2013 Parcel Tax Bylaws by one resolution.

Chief Administrative Officer’s Comments:

I support the recommendations:______

Implications of Recommendation:

General: N/A

Organizational: N/A

Financial: The following table summarizes the original borrowing proceeds, the outstanding debts as at December 31, 2012, and the recommended 2013 parcel tax assessments. Outstanding Debt as Project Borrowing Proceeds at December 31, 2012 Parcel Tax Downtown 70,000 41,255 224.86 Revitalization RDCO Solid Waste N/A N/A 14.18 Transfer Station Water System 3 644,000 264,399 23.32 Intake Water System 2 189,000 103,549 84.87 Supply Line Water Capital N/A N/A 325.00 Improvement Sewer Force Main 1,289,925 760,231 75.00 Beach Avenue Sewer 2,710,075 1,597,211 23.17 Collection System (plus $81.88/acre) Phase 1-D and Phase 3,169,213 2,568,161 184.19 2 Sewer Collection System

2013 Parcel Tax Bylaw No. 2054, 2055, 2056, 2057, 2058, 2059... Page 55 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.C.

Changes to the parcel tax rates from 2012 are as follows:

1. RDCO Transfer Station parcel tax decreased from $15.73 to $14.18 as a result of reduction of the Regional District’s transfer station levy from $43,720 to $39,493 as well as an increase of 6 parcels within the District’s boundaries.

2. Water System Number Three parcel tax decreased from $23.59 to $23.32 as a result of an increase of 10 parcels within the Water System Three local service area.

3. Water Capital Improvement parcel tax is increased from $300 to $325 as approved at the February 26th Committee of the Whole to fund the District’s share of capital costs associated with the Water Master Plan.

4. Beach Avenue Sewage Collection Specified Area parcel tax decreased from $23.25 to $23.17 as a result of an increase of 2 parcels within the Beach Avenue Sewage Collection specified area.

5. Phase 1-D and Phase 2 Sewer Collection Specified Areas parcel tax decreased from $185.33 to $184.19 as a result of an increase of 2 parcels within the Phase 1-D and Phase 2 Sewer Collection local service areas. Strategic Plan: N/A

BACKGROUND: During 1993, Council approved construction of a major upgrading at the Deep Creek Water System Intake. That work was assisted by a provincial grant. The share to be paid by property owners in the old Water System Three Specified Area was $644,000. The borrowing for this project is to be repaid over a 25-year term.

In 1995, Council approved construction of a new Supply Main and Booster Pump Station for Water System Two. The amount borrowed is $189,000 repaid over a 25-year term.

During 1996, Council approved several Loan Authorization Bylaws for the Downtown Revitalization Project, Beach Avenue Sewer Collection Project, and Force Main Transmission Line to Westbank Sewage Treatment Plant. The amount borrowed is four million dollars repaid over a 25-year term.

In 2002, Council approved the Loan Authorization Bylaw for the Phase 1-D and Phase 2 Sewer Collection System.

In 2007, Council adopted a water master plan identifying water capital improvements in the amount of $44,900,866 over a 17-year period funded by the Water Capital Improvement parcel tax assessment.

The Regional District provided a landfill option for Peachland by having a solid waste transfer station available in West Kelowna for Peachland residents to utilize. The annual cost allocated to Peachland in 2013 is $39,493 recovered through parcel taxation at a rate of $14.18 per parcel.

The following Bylaws are being presented to Council for First, Second and Third readings:

. Downtown Revitalization Parcel Tax Bylaw #2054, 2013 . Regional District of Central Okanagan Westside Regional Transfer Station Parcel Tax Bylaw #2055, 2013 . Water System No. 3 Parcel Tax Bylaw #2056, 2013

2013 Parcel Tax Bylaw No. 2054, 2055, 2056, 2057, 2058, 2059... Page 56 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.C.

. Water System No. 2 Parcel Tax Bylaw #2057, 2013 . Water Capital Improvement Parcel Tax Bylaw #2058, 2013 . Sewage Transmission Parcel Tax Bylaw #2059, 2013 . Beach Avenue Sewage Collection Specified Area Parcel Tax Bylaw #2060, 2013 . Beach Avenue Sewage Collection Specified Area Acreage Parcel Tax Bylaw #2061, 2013  Phase 1-D and Phase 2 Sewer Collection Specified Areas Parcel Tax Bylaw #2062, 2013

REPORT/DOCUMENT: Attached: X Available: Nil:

2013 Parcel Tax Bylaws.

OPTIONS: 1. COUNCIL COULD CHOOSE TO SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION. 2. COUNCIL COULD CHOOSE TO NOT SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION. 3. COUNCIL COULD CHOOSE TO REFER THESE BYLAWS TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE.

2013 Parcel Tax Bylaw No. 2054, 2055, 2056, 2057, 2058, 2059... Page 57 of 181 Page 58 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.C.

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND

BYLAW NUMBER 2054

A Bylaw to Impose a Parcel Tax under the Provisions of the Local Government Act ______

WHEREAS certain costs have been incurred by the Corporation of the District of Peachland providing the cost of street lights, sidewalks, curbs and gutters within the Downtown Revitalization Benefiting Area;

AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable and expedient to impose and levy a Parcel Tax to meet such costs;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the District of Peachland, in Open Meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. In this Bylaw:

"Parcel" means any lot, block or other area, including lots created under the Condominium Act, in which land is held or into which it is subdivided, but does not include highways;

"Group of Parcels" means where a building or other improvement extends over more than one parcel or land, those parcels if contiguous may be treated by the Assessor as one parcel and assessed accordingly.

2. A tax shall be levied on each parcel or group of parcels of real property within the Corporation of the District of Peachland which is within the Downtown Revitalization Specified Area.

3. The annual tax for 2013 shall be in the amount of Two Hundred and Twenty-four Dollars and Eighty-six Cents ($224.86) per parcel or group of parcels.

4. That the Downtown Revitalization Parcel Tax Assessment Roll was dealt with April 14, 1999 by a Court of Revision appointed under the Local Government Act.

5. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Downtown Revitalization Parcel Tax Bylaw Number 2054, 2013."

READ A FIRST TIME, this day of , 2013.

READ A SECOND TIME, this day of, 2013.

READ A THIRD TIME, this day of, 2013.

FINALLY RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED, this day of, 2013.

______Mayor Corporate Officer

Dated at Peachland, B.C. This day of , 2013.

2013 Parcel Tax Bylaw No. 2054, 2055, 2056, 2057, 2058, 2059... Page 59 of 181 Page 60 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.C.

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND

BYLAW NUMBER 2055

A Bylaw to Impose a Parcel Tax under the Provisions of the Local Government Act ______

WHEREAS the Regional District of Central Okanagan has provided for a Solid Waste Transfer Station serving land within its boundaries;

AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable and expedient to impose and levy a Parcel Tax to meet such costs;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the District of Peachland, in Open Meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. In this Bylaw:

"Parcel" means any lot, block or other area, including lots created under the Condominium Act, in which land is held or into which it is subdivided, but does not include highways;

"Group of Parcels" means where a building or other improvement extends over more than one parcel or land, those parcels if contiguous may be treated by the Assessor as one parcel and assessed accordingly.

2. A tax shall be levied on each parcel or group of parcels of real property within the Corporation of the District of Peachland which is within the boundaries of the Corporation of the District of Peachland.

3. The annual tax for the year 2013 shall be in the amount of Fourteen Dollars and Eighteen Cents ($14.18) per parcel or group of parcels.

4. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Regional District of Central Okanagan Westside Regional Transfer Station Parcel Tax Bylaw Number 2055, 2013."

READ A FIRST TIME, this day of, 2013.

READ A SECOND TIME, this day of, 2013.

READ A THIRD TIME, this day of, 2013.

FINALLY RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED, this day of, 2013.

______Mayor Corporate Officer

Dated at Peachland, B.C. This day of , 2013.

2013 Parcel Tax Bylaw No. 2054, 2055, 2056, 2057, 2058, 2059... Page 61 of 181 Page 62 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.C.

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND

BYLAW NUMBER 2056

A Bylaw to Impose a Parcel Tax on Owners of Land under the Provisions of the Local Government Act ______

WHEREAS certain costs have been incurred by the Corporation of the District of Peachland providing water utility services to land within Water System Three Benefiting Area boundaries;

AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable and expedient to impose and levy a Parcel Tax to meet such costs;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the District of Peachland, in Open Meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. In this Bylaw, unless the context otherwise requires:

"Parcel" means any lot, block, or other area in which real property is held or into which it is subdivided;

"Group of Parcels" means where a building or other improvement extends over more than one parcel or land, those parcels if contiguous may be treated by the Assessor as one parcel and assessed accordingly.

2. A tax shall be levied on each parcel or group of parcels of real property within the Corporation of the District of Peachland which is capable of being connected to Water System No. 3, or which is deemed to abut on the said Water system.

3. The annual tax for the year 2013 shall be in the amount of Twenty Three Dollars and Thirty Two Cents ($23.32) per parcel or group of parcels.

4. That the Water System No. 3 Parcel Tax Assessment Roll was dealt with April 14, 1999 by a Court of Revision appointed under the Local Government Act.

5. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Water System No. 3 Parcel Tax Bylaw Number 2056, 2013."

READ A FIRST TIME, this day of, 2013.

READ A SECOND TIME, this day of, 2013.

READ A THIRD TIME, this day of, 2013.

FINALLY RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED, this day of, 2013.

______Mayor Corporate Officer

Dated at Peachland, B.C. This day of , 2013.

2013 Parcel Tax Bylaw No. 2054, 2055, 2056, 2057, 2058, 2059... Page 63 of 181 Page 64 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.C.

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND

BYLAW NUMBER 2057

A Bylaw to Impose a Parcel Tax under the Provisions of the Local Government Act ______

WHEREAS certain costs have been incurred by the Corporation of the District of Peachland providing water utility services to land within Water System Two Benefiting Area boundaries;

AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable and expedient to impose and levy a Parcel Tax to meet such costs;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the District of Peachland, in Open Meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. In this Bylaw, unless the context otherwise requires:

"Parcel" means any lot, block or other area in which real property is held or into which it is subdivided.

"Group of Parcels" means where a building or other improvement extends over more than one parcel of land, those parcels if contiguous may be treated by the Assessor as one parcel and assessed accordingly.

2. A tax shall be levied on each parcel or group of parcels of real property within the Corporation of the District of Peachland which is capable of being connected to Water System No. 2 or which is deemed to abut on the said Water System.

3. The annual tax for the year 2013 shall be in the amount of Eighty Four Dollars and Eighty Seven Cents ($84.87) per parcel or group of parcels.

4. The Water System No. 2 Parcel Tax Assessment Roll was considered and dealt with April 14, 1999 by a Court of Revision appointed under the Local Government Act.

5. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Water System No. 2 Parcel Tax Bylaw Number 2057, 2013."

READ A FIRST TIME, this day of, 2013.

READ A SECOND TIME, this day of, 2013.

READ A THIRD TIME, this day of, 2013.

FINALLY RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED, this day of, 2013.

______Mayor Corporate Officer

Dated at Peachland, B.C. This day of , 2013.

2013 Parcel Tax Bylaw No. 2054, 2055, 2056, 2057, 2058, 2059... Page 65 of 181 Page 66 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.C.

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND

BYLAW NUMBER 2058

A Bylaw to Impose a Parcel Tax under the Provisions of the Local Government Act ______

WHEREAS the District of Peachland will provide funding for Water System Capital Improvements identified in the District’s Financial Plan;

AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable and expedient to impose and levy a Parcel Tax to meet such costs;

NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the District of Peachland, in open meeting assembled, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. In this Bylaw:

“Parcel” means any lot, block or other area, including lots created under the Condominium Act, in which land is held or into which it is subdivided, but does not include highways;

“Group of Parcels” means, where a building or other improvement extends over more than one parcel of land, those parcels, if contiguous may be treated by the Assessor as one parcel and assessed accordingly;

2. A tax shall be levied on each parcel or group of parcels of real property within the Corporation of the District of Peachland which is within the boundaries of the Corporation of the District of Peachland.

3. The annual tax for the year 2013 shall be in the amount of Three Hundred Twenty Five Dollars ($325.00) per parcel or group of parcels.

4. The Water Capital Improvements Parcel Tax Assessment Roll was dealt with April 25th, 2007 by a Parcel Tax Review Panel appointed under the Community Charter.

5. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “Water Capital Improvements Parcel Tax Bylaw Number 2058, 2013.”

READ A FIRST TIME, this day of, 2013.

READ A SECOND TIME, this day of, 2013.

READ A THIRD TIME this day of, 2013.

FINALLY RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2013.

______Mayor Corporate Officer

Dated at Peachland, B.C. This day of , 2013.

2013 Parcel Tax Bylaw No. 2054, 2055, 2056, 2057, 2058, 2059... Page 67 of 181 Page 68 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.C.

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND

BYLAW NUMBER 2059

A Bylaw to Impose a Parcel Tax under the Provisions of the Local Government Act ______

WHEREAS the District of Peachland has provided for the financing of construction of a sewage transmission system on land within its boundaries;

AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable and expedient to impose and levy a Parcel Tax to meet such costs;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the District of Peachland, in Open Meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. In this Bylaw:

"Parcel" means any lot, block or other area, including lots created under the Condominium Act, in which land is held or into which it is subdivided, but does not include highways;

"Group of Parcels" means where a building or other improvement extends over more than one parcel or land, those parcels if contiguous may be treated by the Assessor as one parcel and assessed accordingly.

2. A tax shall be levied on each parcel or group of parcels of real property within the Corporation of the District of Peachland which is within the boundaries of the Corporation of the District of Peachland.

3. The annual tax for the year 2013 shall be in the amount of Seventy-Five Dollars ($75.00) per parcel or group of parcels.

4. That the Sewage Transmission Parcel Tax Assessment Roll was considered and dealt with April 14, 1999 by a Court of Revision appointed under the Local Government Act.

5. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Sewage Transmission Parcel Tax Bylaw Number 2059, 2013."

READ A FIRST TIME, this day of, 2013.

READ A SECOND TIME, this day of, 2013.

READ A THIRD TIME, this day of , 2013.

FINALLY RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED, this day of , 2013.

______Mayor Corporate Officer

Dated at Peachland, B.C. This day of , 2013.

2013 Parcel Tax Bylaw No. 2054, 2055, 2056, 2057, 2058, 2059... Page 69 of 181 Page 70 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.C.

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND

BYLAW NUMBER 2060

A Bylaw to Impose a Parcel Tax under the Provisions of the Local Government Act ______

WHEREAS the District of Peachland has provided for the financing of construction of a sewage collection works in the Beach Avenue Sewage Collection Specified Area;

AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable and expedient to impose and levy a Parcel Tax to meet such costs;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the District of Peachland, in Open Meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. In this Bylaw:

"Parcel" means any lot, block or other area, including lots created under the Condominium Act, in which land is held or into which it is subdivided, but does not include highways;

"Group of Parcels" means where a building or other improvement extends over more than one parcel or land, those parcels if contiguous may be treated by the Assessor as one parcel and assessed accordingly.

2. A tax shall be levied on each parcel or group of parcels of real property within the Corporation of the District of Peachland which is within the Beach Avenue Sewage Collection Specified Area.

3. The annual tax for the year 2013 shall be in the amount of Twenty Three Dollars and Seventeen Cents ($23.17) per parcel or group of parcels.

4. That the Beach Avenue Sewage Collection Specified Area Parcel Tax Assessment Roll was considered and dealt with April 14, 1999 by a Court of Revision appointed under the Local Government Act.

5. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Beach Avenue Sewage Collection Specified Area Parcel Tax Bylaw Number 2060, 2013."

READ A FIRST TIME, this day of, 2013.

READ A SECOND TIME, this day of, 2013.

READ A THIRD TIME, this day of, 2013.

FINALLY RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED, this day of, 2013.

______Mayor Corporate Officer

Dated at Peachland, B.C. This day of , 2013.

2013 Parcel Tax Bylaw No. 2054, 2055, 2056, 2057, 2058, 2059... Page 71 of 181 Page 72 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.C.

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND

BYLAW NUMBER 2061

A Bylaw to Impose a Parcel Tax under the Provisions of the Local Government Act ______

WHEREAS the District of Peachland has provided for the financing of construction of a sewage collection works in the Beach Avenue Sewage Collection Specified Area;

AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable and expedient to impose and levy a Parcel Tax to meet such costs;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the District of Peachland, in Open Meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. In this Bylaw: "Acreage" means a measure of parcel size (one (1) acre equals 0.4047 hectares).

"Parcel" means any lot, block or other area, including lots created under the Condominium Act, in which land is held or into which it is subdivided, but does not include highways;

"Group of Parcels" means where a building or other improvement extends over more than one parcel or land, those parcels if contiguous may be treated by the Assessor as one parcel and assessed accordingly.

2. A tax shall be levied on each parcel or group of parcels of real property within the Corporation of the District of Peachland which is within the Beach Avenue Sewage Collection Specified Area.

3. The annual tax for the year 2013 shall be in the amount of Two Hundred and Two Dollars and Thirty-Two Cents ($202.32) per hectare (Eighty-One Dollars and Eighty-Eight Cents [$81.88] per acre) per parcel or group of parcels.

4. That the Beach Avenue Sewage Collection Specified Area Acreage Parcel Tax Assessment Roll was dealt with April 14, 1999 by a Court of Revision appointed under the Local Government Act.

5. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Beach Avenue Sewage Collection Specified Area Acreage Parcel Tax Bylaw Number 2061, 2013.”

READ A FIRST TIME, this day of, 2013.

READ A SECOND TIME, this day of, 2013.

READ A THIRD TIME, this day of , 2013.

FINALLY RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED, this day of, 2013.

______Mayor Corporate Officer

Dated at Peachland, B.C. This day of , 2013.

2013 Parcel Tax Bylaw No. 2054, 2055, 2056, 2057, 2058, 2059... Page 73 of 181 Page 74 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.C.

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND

BYLAW NUMBER 2062

A Bylaw to Impose a Parcel Tax under the Provisions of the Local Government Act ______

WHEREAS the District of Peachland has provided for the financing of construction of a sewage collection works in the Phase 1-D and Phase 2 Sewer Collection Specified Areas;

AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable and expedient to impose and levy a Parcel Tax to meet such costs;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the District of Peachland, in Open Meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. In this Bylaw:

"Parcel" means any lot, block or other area, including lots created under the Condominium Act, in which land is held or into which it is subdivided, but does not include highways;

"Group of Parcels" means where a building or other improvement extends over more than one parcel or land, those parcels if contiguous may be treated by the Assessor as one parcel and assessed accordingly.

2. A tax shall be levied on each parcel or group of parcels of real property within the Corporation of the District of Peachland which is within the Phase 1-D and Phase 2 Sewer Collection Specified Areas.

3. The annual tax for the year 2013 shall be in the amount of One Hundred and Eighty Four Dollars and Nineteen Cents ($184.19) per parcel or group of parcels.

4. The Phase 1-D and Phase 2 Sewer Collection Specified Area Parcel Tax Assessment Roll was dealt with April 24, 2006 by a Parcel Tax Review Panel appointed under the Community Charter.

5. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Phase 1-D and Phase 2 Sewer Collection Specified Areas Parcel Tax Bylaw Number 2062, 2013.”

READ A FIRST TIME, this day of , 2013.

READ A SECOND TIME, this day of, 2013.

READ A THIRD TIME, this day of, 2013.

FINALLY RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED, this day of , 2013.

______Mayor Corporate Officer

Dated at Peachland, B.C. This day of , 2013.

2013 Parcel Tax Bylaw No. 2054, 2055, 2056, 2057, 2058, 2059... Page 75 of 181 Page 76 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.D.

District of Peachland Request for Decision

To: Mayor & Council From: Director of Community Services Date: April 17, 2013 Subject: Climate Change Showdown Recommendation: THAT Council fund the Climate Change Showdown for $1520.00 from the Community Services Budget “Other Events”.

Chief Administrative Officer’s Comments:

I support the recommendations:______

Implications of Recommendation:

General: Project supported by the Mayors’ Task Force on Climate Change Organizational: n/a Financial: $380/per class room (4 intermediate classrooms) Can be absorbed by the Community Services Budget in 2013 Policy: The District signed the Climate Action Charter (2007) committing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Strategic Plan: Community Action Charter

BACKGROUND: The Mayors’ Task Force on Climate Change has been looking for innovative strategies to engage the community – including children – in projects that reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions. The Climate Change Show Down is a program designed for children grade 4-7 offered through the BC Sustainable Energy Association (BCSEA). In reviewing the program with the committee, it appears that this program meets the objectives of the Mayors’ Task Force on engaging the children in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. District staff is meeting with the school on Friday, April 19th to determine feasibility of implementation in this (2012-2013) school year.

The Climate Change Showdown (CCS) includes a 90 minute workshop and a 4 week home activity known as the “CCS Contest”. The workshop is delivered to grade 4-7 students in the classroom in a fun and interactive way that engages the students. The students are trained to be Climate Change Superheroes, equipping them with the skills and knowledge to reduce their carbon footprint through taking part in the contest, which encourages changing behaviours at

Funding for Climate Change Showdown Page 77 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.D.

home to reduce energy use and environmental impact. After the project, there is a final report provided which shows the estimate impact of Green House Gas Emissions (in tonnes).

Experienced environmental educators deliver the workshops to elementary students in the classroom.

REPORT/DOCUMENT: Attached: x Available: Nil: Funding proposal for Peachland 2012 Final report

OPTIONS: 1. COUNCIL MAY CHOOSE TO SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION 2. COUNCIL MAY CHOOSE NOT TO SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION 3. COUNCIL MAY REFER BACK TO COTW OR STAFF FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

Funding for Climate Change Showdown Page 78 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.D. 5 - 4217 Glanford Avenue Victoria, BC Canada V8Z 4B9 (250) 744-2720 [email protected]

April 10, 2013 Cheryl Wiebe Director of Community Services District of Peachland

Climate Change Showdown Workshops for 2012-2013

The CCS informs and engages grade 4-7 students, along with their families, in ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and embrace healthier, more sustainable lifestyles. Following previous year’s support within the province, we would like to continue to provide this education to students all over BC with better success rates and reach.

Climate Change Showdown Workshop cost

Est. Cost / work # of # of (t)/contest Contest Estimated shop wkshops Students participant return GHG's Climate Change Workshop (under 2) $420 1 25 1.8 55% 45 (t) Climate Change Workshop (over 2) $380 1 25 1.8 55% 45 (t)

We would acknowledge the funding of the District of Peachland through recognition on our website and in classrooms. BCSEA would provide a report outlining the extent of the program and the GHG reductions.

I look forward to working with you and the City on providing climate change education to elementary school students through the Climate Change Showdown as a part of your Sustainability Plan this year. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards,

Renate Sitch Program Manager-Climate Change Showdown B.C. Sustainable Energy Association 604-564-0016 [email protected]

Funding for Climate Change Showdown Page 79 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.D.

5 - 4217 Glanford Avenue

Victoria, BC Canada, V8Z 4B9

[email protected]

604-564-0016

Climate Change Showdown 2011/12 Final Report-BC Hydro

By: Renate Sitch, Program Manager 29/June/2012

Thanks to the generous support of $7,000 from BC Hydro, the BCSEA was able to deliver the Climate Change Showdown (CCS) to elementary schools in BC Hydro service areas across the province during the 2011/12 school year. The funding covered delivery of 20 workshops in a range of communities. It also attracted vital support from other funders.

The CCS program took a fun-filled 90-minute workshop into the classroom to educate students on climate change and energy conservation. Grade 4 to 7 students and their teachers were engaged with a story telling adventure traveling to the future in a time machine to imagine a positive green future that they are involved in creating, followed by a 20-minute animated video and playing the BCSEA-designed climate change quiz show and skits. After learning about climate change and brainstorming how they can reduce their own impact, the students took home the Climate Change Showdown Contest and worked with their parents for four weeks to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs).

Results The BCSEA delivered 230 Climate Change Showdown workshops to 6073 students in schools in B.C. from November 2011 to May 2012 as follows:

# Students that Estimated CCS 20011/12 # of Received GHG's City/Region Workshops Workshops (tonnes) Burnaby 15 436 322 Delta 11 294 136 Dist. Of North Vancouver 3 82 61 Esquimalt 8 227 124 Kamloops 7 191 128 Kootenays 6 161 89 New West 8 213 180 North Vancouver 13 329 121 Okanagan 24 633 418 Revelstoke 8 171 80 Richmond 48 1300 684 Surrey 41 1054 754 Terrace 9 247 105 Vancouver 7 171 165 Victoria 10 244 152 Sea to Sky 12 320 142 Totals 230 6073 3662

Funding for Climate Change Showdown Page 80 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.D.

5 - 4217 Glanford Avenue

Victoria, BC Canada, V8Z 4B9

[email protected]

604-564-0016

Climate Change Showdown Totals 2011-2012:

GHG Totals (t)

Sea to Sky Victoria Vancouver Terrace Surrey Richmond Revelstoke Okanagan North Vancouver New West Kootenays Kamloops Esquimalt Dist. Of North Vancouver Delta Burnaby

0.00 100.00 200.00 300.00 400.00 500.00 600.00 700.00 800.00

GHG Totals (t)

**For more details on contest action #’s see Appendix A. Funding for Climate Change Showdown Page 81 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.D.

5 - 4217 Glanford Avenue

Victoria, BC Canada, V8Z 4B9

[email protected]

604-564-0016

# of Workshops 11/12

Victoria Dist. Of North Vancouver 4% Sea to Vancouver 3% Burnaby Sky 1% 7% Delta 5% Esquimalt Terrace 5% 3% 4% Kamloops 3% Kootenays 3% New West 3% Surrey 18% North Vancouver 6%

Okanagan 10%

Richmond 21% Revelstoke 3%

BC Hydro funded workshops: # of BCHydro Winning Class: New Region workshops Westminster Burnaby 2 New Westminster 1 Whistler 6 Pemberton 3 Squamish 3 Okanagan 5

Total 20 Winning Class: Burnaby

For more photo’s visit: www.facebook.com/ClimateChangeShowdown

Funding for Climate Change Showdown Page 82 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.D.

5 - 4217 Glanford Avenue

Victoria, BC Canada, V8Z 4B9

[email protected]

604-564-0016

Comparison of Results

# of GHGs Students % Total Saved (t/ that Contest Classes Contest GHGs GHGs GHGs contest Annual # of Received Return Returning GHGs surveys saved saved participa Totals Workshops Workshops Rate Contests (t) (t) (t) (t/student) nt) 2011/12 230 6073 48.8% 90% 3661.71 N/A 3661.71 0.60 1.23 2010/11 298 7650 29.9% 62% 3955.75 N/A 3955.8 0.52 1.73 2009/10 340 9414 31.5% 63% 5070.00 2324 7394 0.78 N/A 2008/09 609 14,665 23.7% 53% 3944.00 7238 11230 0.77 N/A 2007/08 555 14002 20.8% N/A N/A N/A 9815.2 0.70 N/A 2006/07 77 2,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1150 0.58 N/A Program Totals 2109 53804 16631.46 37207 0.66

Measuring Green House Gas Reductions The program estimates GHG savings resulting from contest forms* and the actions within using a GHG calculator tool. For each activity it is assumed that a given saving will result from that activity over the period of the contest. It is then assumed that the students newly learned behaviour will continue for the year. Savings are measured in kWh of electricity and gas, litres of water, km traveled by car and so forth. The resulting GHG savings are calculated using emissions factors for electricity produced in BC (BC Hydro) and standard emissions factors for natural gas, and gasoline.

The GHG calculator tool was updated for the 2011-12 school year. In previous years, emissions savings per action were borrowed from the federal government’s One Tonne Challenge (2004). As the Challenge had not been revamped recently we choose to review the emissions savings for each action in house, resulting in a more detailed and transparent calculator.

We applied a BC relevant emissions factor to electricity data, which is lower than the Canadian average that was used by the One Tonne Challenge. Therefore, emissions savings from reduced electricity use are now lower on the contest. Some other actions have slightly higher savings but overall the total savings are less. The core actions now save 2.7 tonnes GHGs compared to 3.3 tonnes last year. The newly added “additional” actions are worth 0.6 tonnes (making a total possible saving of 3.33 tonnes on this year’s contest).

Other new features of the GHG calculator include the ability to measure savings per replaced light bulb, rather than assuming a bulk number of light bulbs is replaced by each student completing the action. The latest data for eating meat free meals is taken from the Environmental Working Group's Meat Eaters Guide (2012). Gasoline savings were estimated using the 2009 Canadian Vehicle Survey. Other sources included guides produced by BC Hydro and Fortis BC, the Capitol Regional District and the One Tonne Challenge.

Funding for Climate Change Showdown Page 83 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.D.

5 - 4217 Glanford Avenue

Victoria, BC Canada, V8Z 4B9

[email protected]

604-564-0016

* Contest Forms: this measurement tool is an action-based contest that awarded points to students who completed actions related to saving energy, water, fuel, reducing waste, eating locally, and trying meat free meals over a four week period (as verified by their parent’s signatures). Contest Actions and GHG Savings

The overall provincial contest participation rate was 48.8%. The percentage of classes that returned some contests was 90%. From a greenhouse gas perspective, the program reduced GHG emissions by over an estimated 3661.7 tonnes, the equivalent of taking 651 cars off the road for a year, the use of electricity for 414 homes for a year, and the equivalent of carbon sequestration of 708 acres of pine or forests.

To engage the students, there was space to write or draw their own GHG saving ideas; 1070 ideas were submitted and the best ideas will be posted to our Facebook page or can be seen below. (See Appendix B)

Rewarding Showdown Participants

For the winning classes that achieved the highest average of GHG’s in each region a Pizza Party was organized and sourced from locally owned businesses were feasible. Additional prizes for 346 top students prizes included: a tour for 4 at Grouse Mountain, 2 Casio solar watches, Green Science toys, Solar Keychain flashlights, recycled aluminum carabineers, various books related to climate change, Grow your own food kits/pods, re-usable bags, and various regional donated prizes and gift certificates. Over 230 Teachers played a key part in motivating students and those with high class participation rates (134 provincially) received thank-you cards and incentive prizes.

Looking Forward

With six successful years of the Climate Change Showdown, we are happy with our success and grateful for the funding from our supporters who have made it all possible. In an effort to ensure future success and growth the program staff and advisory committee hosted a strategic planning session on July 6th, 2011, to assess the program and prioritize some needed enhancements for the short and long term. Much of the feedback collected from stakeholders was taken into consideration while formatting this year’s program format and materials. Due to these changes we have been able to increase our return rates from 29% to 48% for participating students and from 62% to 90% per class!

The introduction of a follow-up visit to the classrooms to collect contests and recognize the students hard work as well as to ensure accountability with teachers is likely a major reason for this. We piloted the follow-up visit in most regions and, given our results, we intend to role this out to all regions next year.

We are very excited to be continuously redeveloping the program and will continue to schedule time and resources for future improvements.

Funding for Climate Change Showdown Page 84 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.D.

5 - 4217 Glanford Avenue

Victoria, BC Canada, V8Z 4B9

[email protected]

604-564-0016

Challenges:

Although we were able to increase our results this year - we had to work for it! With the BC Teacher’s strike ongoing throughout the year we had some difficulties communicating with teachers to book workshops and had to be more aggressive in our efforts. Also, due to some funding cuts as compared to last year we delivered about 70 fewer workshops in BC.

Recognition of BC Hydro’s Support

BC Hydro was acknowledged for their support of the Climate Change Showdown as follows:

 BC Hydro was featured as a funder on the Climate Change Contest form taken home by students  A BC Hydro logo (hyperlink to BC Hydro website) and name on the sponsor’s page of BCSEA website (www.bcsea.org/ccshowdown)  Students were directed to view the BC Hydro website as part of an energy saving action on the contest form  Presenters were instructed to acknowledge the BC Hydro Power Smart program

The BCSEA would like to thank BC Hydro for its partnership in achieving the shared goals of increasing awareness and making real behaviour change possible in relation to energy conservation and GHG reduction among students and their families in BC.

Thank-you, we look forward to 2012/13 and beyond!

Renate Sitch Program Manager-Climate Change Showdown B.C. Sustainable Energy Association 604-564-0016 [email protected]

Funding for Climate Change Showdown Page 85 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.D.

5 - 4217 Glanford Avenue

Victoria, BC Canada, V8Z 4B9

[email protected]

604-564-0016

Appendix A-Summary of number of students completing each Contest Actions

Total students completing Contest Actions this action Light bulbs (Number of CFL light bulbs fitted) 14012 Bonus-shower (Number of low Flow shower heads fitted) 721

Car Free Day (number of car-free journeys) 6786 Go Bio (number of biodegradable products purchased) 2908 Footprint (calculate family's ecological footprint) 1051 Turn It Off (number times electrical appliances turned off) 8675 Tire Trick (number people who checked tire pressure) 654

Local Food (number of meals) 1402 Grow your own (number of new vegetable plants grown) 1151 Idle Free (ask parents not to idle) 4904 Cool Clothes (number of people started washing on cold) 1255 Be Cool (number of students who turned the thermostat down 1763 Meat Free (number of times students had a meat-free day) 5209 Bc Hydro Fortis (number people who visited theses sights 2650 Compost (number new bins) 449 Bye-bye Standby (number power bars purchased and used) 939 Curtains closed (number of nights if not all month) 3030 Curtains closed (number students closed curtains all month) 912 Wood Stove (number students researched efficient fires) 426 Energy Saving Ideas (number of students with an idea) 1070

Funding for Climate Change Showdown Page 86 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 8.D.

5 - 4217 Glanford Avenue

Victoria, BC Canada, V8Z 4B9

[email protected]

604-564-0016

Appendix B-“Your Turn” Student contributions:

Funding for Climate Change Showdown Page 87 of 181 Page 88 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.A.

District of Peachland Request for Decision

To: Mayor & Council From: Dave Smith Director of Planning and Development Services Date: March 15, 2013

Subject: Zoning Application # Z13/1,002, Lot 2, Plan KAP 81996, DL 449 5251 Buchanan Road, Peachland

Recommendation: THAT Council pass First and Second Readings to Zoning Bylaw No. 1375, Amendment Bylaw No 2049, 2013 to change the zoning designation of Lot 2, Plan KAP 81996, DL 449, from R-1 Single Family Residential zone to CD-10 Comprehensive Development – Buchanan Road Duplex zone on the zoning map; and, THAT a Public Hearing be scheduled subject to additional information being provided as required by District staff.

Chief Administrative Officer’s Comments:

I support the recommendations:______

Implications of Recommendation:

General: The proposed recommendation will initiate the public consultation process as outlined in the Local Government Act. If Council proceeds with the recommendation, a public hearing will be scheduled.

Organizational: District process will include Council and Staff Council attending the public hearing to listen to the concerns of the community. Council could choose to waive the public hearing requirement as stated in S. 890(4) of the Local Government Act.

Financial: The applicant has submitted the full application fee. The District will be required to place two consecutive newspaper advertisements in the Peachland View.

The developer will be responsible for all “on and off-site costs” associated with the proposed development.

Policy: The proposed recommendation is consistent with the Official Community Plan and complies with the Low Density Residential Land Use Designation.

A zoning amendment is required in order for the development to proceed.

Zoning Application from R1, Single Family to CD-10 Comprehen... Page 89 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.A.

Strategic Plan: N/A

BACKGROUND: Application:

The application proposes to develop a duplex (2 family dwelling) on a site which is zoned R-1 (Single Family Residential Zone). Rezoning to CD-10 comprehensive Development District is required to accommodate this request.

The subject property comprises approximately 1,271 m2. (13,679 ft2) and is currently zoned R-1 (Single Family Residential). The property is designated as Low Density Residential within the Official Community Plan, which permits a maximum density of 15 units per hectare (6) units per acre) and a maximum height of three stories. The OCP policies encourage locating duplexes close to multiple family residential, commercial or institutional uses, in single family areas undergoing redevelopment and innovative housing forms such as cluster housing where slopes can integrate form without significant impact on the natural attributes of the proposed site.

The “Stonewater” project is located two lots North of this property where the Applicant has completed an eight units townhouse development which has received a Okanagan Building “Tommi” award in 2012.

Zoning Comparison: Bulk and Site Criteria R-1 R-2 Duplex Proposed CD-10 (Single Family) Application Site Area 830m2 830m2 1273m2 Density FAR .45 FAR .48 FAR 0.26 Max Units (site = acres); 6 UPA, 15UPA 2 40% 40% 25% Lot coverage Setbacks Front 6m Front 7.5m Front 6m Rear 7.5m Rear 7.5m Rear 35.5m Side 1.5 Side 1.5 Side 1.5 Height (from natural grade) 6.7 – 9.1m, 22- 6.7 – 9.1m, 22-30ft 9.3m , 31 ft 30ft Off street parking 2 per dwelling 2 per dwelling 3 per dwelling Landscaping abutting Hwy Yes Yes Yes

Usable Private Open Space 470m2

Servicing Issues:

This property has municipal water and sanitary sewer available to the property. The previous developer when subdividing this property in 2006 provided cash in lieu of curb, gutter and sidewalk on one side and dedication of 3m of waterfront as required. Therefore this applicant cannot be requested to contribute to these items again. Staff will still request review of street lighting and fire hydrant requirements. They will however be required to contribute Development Cost charges (DCC’) at time of subdivision approval.

The developer will be required to construct all ‘on and off–site” services that will be required in order to see the proposed development proceed. As the project will eventually be a strata development, the strata corporation will assume all maintenance responsibilities for all infrastructures within the property lines.

Zoning Application from R1, Single Family to CD-10 Comprehen... Page 90 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.A.

Project Features:

The site specific form and character of the buildings and landscaping are submitted as conceptual drawings only at this time and will be processed as part of a Development Permit which happens prior to issuance of a building permit

The land is to be developed as a stratified duplex. The two units will be slightly off-set 1.7m (5.6 ft) in front of the other. The units are shown as 2 stories from the Buchanan Road elevation and will be a 3 storey walk out from the lake side. The building height and roof line will be flat reducing the possibility of visual impact to homes of the upper side of Buchanan Road. It is anticipated that these two units will be finished similar to the “Stonewater” development which is located two lots to the north. The form and character details will be specifically addressed during the Development permit process.

A detached accessory duplex garage (48’ X 22 ft) will be constructed along the south property line, also flat roof and finished the same as the duplex units.

The general concept of the landscaping plan and proposed retaining walls have been provided indicating the trees, shrubs and groundcover that will be provided. The retaining walls will be approximately 1.5m in height and constructed of textured (natural look) interlocking stone. Photographs of the natural looking stone have been attached.

The project will assist the District in the reduction of Greenhouse gases (GHG’s). It contains a number of sustainable development features, which are listed as: High standard “E” windows with shading to reduce summer heat and save energy demand for heating and cooling Geo-thermal heating systems, with heat pump systems shall be provided. heat recovery ventilation systems low flow fixtures to reduce water use. xeriscape landscaping to reduces watering and irrigation demand. Passive solar

Land Use Regulation – CD Zoning Proposed:

A Comprehensive Development Zone is being proposed. The CD zone represents a site- specific land use regulation adopted in response to the application of a landowner whose plans cannot be accommodated by using an existing zoning category. The bylaw refers to the use, density and siting of buildings and structures that are site specific to this zone and attached as schedules to the zoning bylaw.

Additional Requirements: Before public hearing, staff will require additional information including: a Geotechnical and hydro-geotechnical report, a design brief: report on engineering matters – sanitary and storm sewer, and water.

Referral comments will be requested prior to Public Hearing. Prior to any development taking place on the proposed site a Development Permit will be required to be provided at a public meeting of Council and approved by Council resolution. The Development Permit (DP) will include detailed plans showing, proposed siting on the property, elevations of the buildings and how compatible they are with the natural attributes of the site.

Public Information meeting:

The applicant has canvassed the neighbourhood to obtain feedback and has held a public information meeting on April 15th, 2013. The results of this survey are as follows.

Zoning Application from R1, Single Family to CD-10 Comprehen... Page 91 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.A.

5270 Buchanan Road – Appreciated Mr. Moyers previous development on Buchanan Road and have no objections to this application. Councillor Condon and Kerbes attended the Public Information meeting.

The application has been circulated to the various affected technical agencies. No major concerns were identified. Their comments have been attached.

REPORT/DOCUMENT: Attached: Available: Nil:

1. Technical Comments 2. Fact Sheet 3. Zoning Bylaw # 2049

OPTIONS: 1. COUNCIL MAY CHOOSE TO SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION. 2. COUNCIL MAY CHOOSE NOT TO SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION. 3. COUNCIL MAY CHOOSE TO REFER THE MATTER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.

Zoning Application from R1, Single Family to CD-10 Comprehen... Page 92 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.A.

Technical Comments:

Agency comments:

Interior Health Region: No concerns with proposed zoning as the development will be required to be connected to municipal water and sanitary sewer.

RDCO: Westbank Sewage Specified Area DCC in the amount of $3,188 will be required. [District DCC’s also to be required.]

Peachland Building Inspection Services: Plan check for height and setbacks and no concerns.

Public Works – Engineering studies to address Peachland’s Subdivision and Development Services Bylaw regarding road frontage upgrades, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water services.

Utilities:

Telus: They are able to feed the proposal with aerial structure and a ROW easement is required.

Shaw Cable: Owner/Developer will need to install an underground conduit system per Shaw Cable drawing and specification.

Fortis Gas: Fortis BC has no concerns.

*Riparian Area Report required if changes within 30m of shoreline or for dock construction at Development Permit stage.

.

Zoning Application from R1, Single Family to CD-10 Comprehen... Page 93 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.A.

FACT SHEET

1. Application No. Z13/1,002

2. Application Type: Zoning

3. Owner: Rob Moyer

4. Applicant: New Town Planning Services

5. Address: 1450 Pandosy St, Kelowna, V1Y 1P3

6. Legal Description: Lot 2, PlanKAP81996, DL 449

7. Address of Site: 5251 Buchanan Road

8. Zoning Category: R-1 Single Family Residential

9. Proposed Zoning: CD-10 Comprehensive Development – Buchanan Road Duplex)

10. Purpose of Application: Rezoning application to permit the construction of a duplex unit.

11. Official Community Plan Low Density Residential

Zoning Application from R1, Single Family to CD-10 Comprehen... Page 94 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.A.

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND

BYLAW NUMBER 2049, 2013

A Bylaw to Amend Zoning Bylaw Number 1375, 1996 ______

WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the District of Peachland has adopted Zoning Bylaw Number 1375, 1996;

AND WHEREAS it is deemed necessary to amend Zoning Bylaw Number 1375, 1996;

NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the District of Peachland, in Open Meeting assembled,

HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. That Zoning Bylaw Number 1375, 1996, be amended by changing the zoning designations of Lot 2, Plan KAP81996, DL 449, as shown on Map ‘A’, from R-1 Single Family Residential, to CD-10 Comprehensive Development – Buchanan Road Duplex zone.

2. This Bylaw may be cited as “Zoning Bylaw No. 1375 Amendment Bylaw Number 2049, 2013.”

Zoning Bylaw Number 1375, 1996, is hereby amended by adding to Part 20 the following:

“CD-10 Comprehensive Development – Buchanan Road Duplex.

A. Intent

The zone is intended to provide residential development compatible with a residential neighbourhood and not for commercial rental purposes, and the design shall be a duplex residence based upon a comprehensive plan.

B. Permitted Uses

Land and structures shall be used for the following uses, or for a combination of uses, provided that such uses are a comprehensive design, where most of the development is not on land greater than 30% slope and where the development is located on sewered urban lots.

1. Single Family Dwelling 2. Accessory Vehicle Garage Buildings 3. Accessory Buildings

C. Conditions of Use

1. All buildings and structures shall comply with the requirements in zoning bylaw No. 1375 Amendment Bylaw No. 2049, as contained in Part 20 (Comprehensive Development) of this bylaw.

2. Notwithstanding Clause 1 above, all buildings and structures shall comply with the size, shape, and siting as designated on the Comprehensive Development plan presented by:

Zoning Application from R1, Single Family to CD-10 Comprehen... Page 95 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.A.

Site Plan by Excite Home Plan/ Jazel, and Concept and Building Elevation Plans as provided as part of this bylaw and as adopted by Council. These are included as Schedule “B – to B-5 attached to and forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 1375, Amendment Bylaw No. 2049, 2013.

3. The number of housing units is limited to two within a single structure.

4. Notwithstanding Part 4-14 in Zoning Bylaw No. 1375, 1996, requiring the minimum width of 7 metres (24 ft), the strata minimums shall be a width of 6.0m (20 ft).

5. The building form shall be constructed containing a maximum of 3 storeys and with a maximum height of 9.3 metres (31ft).

6. Accessory garages shall be developed in a manner consistent with the form and character of the primary residential dwellings. These are included as Schedule “C-1,

7. Off-street parking shall comply with the specifications contained in Zoning Bylaw No, 1375, 996, as contained in Part 5 (Off-street Parking).

8. Landscaping shall be provided as shown on the plans provided and included in this zone. These are included as Schedule “C-1.

9. A restrictive covenant shall be placed on the title of all dwellings, such that there shall be no rental of a dwelling unit for a period of less than 90 days time or for a purpose deemed to be “commercial”, which is contrary to the spirit and intent of this zone to permit zoning designation for residents.

D. Sustainable Development Features

1. High standard “E” windows with shading to reduce summer heat and save energy for heating and cooling. 2. Geo-thermal heating systems with heat pumps. 3. Heat recovery ventilation systems. 4. Low flow plumbing fixtures to reduce water use. 5. Passive solar design including favourable placement of windows to capture sunlight.

READ A FIRST TIME, this ______day of ______, 2013.

PUBLIC HEARING HELD, this ______day of ______, 2013.

READ A SECOND TIME, this ______day of ______, 2013

READ A THIRD TIME, this ______day of ______, 2013

Zoning Application from R1, Single Family to CD-10 Comprehen... Page 96 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.A.

APPROVAL RECEIVED from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this ______day of ______, 2013.

FINALLY RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED, this ______day of ______, 2013

______Mayor Corporate Officer

Dated at Peachland, B.C.

This ______day of ______, 2013.

Zoning Application from R1, Single Family to CD-10 Comprehen... Page 97 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.A.

Zoning Application from R1, Single Family to CD-10 Comprehen... Page 98 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.A.

Zoning Application from R1, Single Family to CD-10 Comprehen... Page 99 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.A.

Zoning Application from R1, Single Family to CD-10 Comprehen... Page 100 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.A.

Zoning Application from R1, Single Family to CD-10 Comprehen... Page 101 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.A.

Zoning Application from R1, Single Family to CD-10 Comprehen... Page 102 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.A.

Zoning Application from R1, Single Family to CD-10 Comprehen... Page 103 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.A.

Zoning Application from R1, Single Family to CD-10 Comprehen... Page 104 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.A.

Zoning Application from R1, Single Family to CD-10 Comprehen... Page 105 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.A.

Zoning Application from R1, Single Family to CD-10 Comprehen... Page 106 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.A.

Zoning Application from R1, Single Family to CD-10 Comprehen... Page 107 of 181 Page 108 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B.

District of Peachland Request for Decision

To: Mayor & Council From: Dave Smith, Director of Planning and Development Services

Date: March 25, 2013

Subject: Development Permit DP13/10,003 – 5261 Buchanan Road Lot 3, Plan KAP37515, DL 449

Recommendation: THAT Council approve Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmentally sensitive area on Lot 3, Plan KAP37515, DL 449

Chief Administrative Officer’s Comments:

I support the recommendations:______

Implications of Recommendation:

General: The Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) Development Permit will protect and minimize the impact of development within the riparian area of 30m from a high water mark.

Organizational: N/A

Financial: N/A

Policy: Provincial Riparian Areas Regulation (RAR) requires a Qualified Environmental Professional (QEP) report for any works within 30m of a stream or lake

BACKGROUND: The owner of the property located at 5261 Buchanan Road wishes to construct a pool and associated landscaping e.g. retaining walls, patios, ornamental planting etc. The need for a Development Permit for this project is due to the proximity of the property to Okanagan Lake. When any work is proposed 30m from a stream or lake an Environmentally Sensitive Areas Development Permit is triggered. This is in direct compliance with Provincial Riparian Area Regulations (RAR) which requires a Qualified Environmental Professional (QEP) report regarding any proposed development within that 30m buffer zone. As is required with all Development Permits a letter requesting comments or concerns was sent to property owners within a 100m radius of the above noted properties.

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 109 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B.

The Specified Streamside Protection and Enhancement Area (SPEA) width for the subject property equals 15m from the high water level (HWL). The encroachment area will be enhanced with native riparian plantings. The proposed development consists of a pool construction and landscaping within 30m of the HWL of Okanagan Lake, the proposed works are detailed on the landscaping plan attached to this report. Works include installation of a pool, hot tub, pizza oven and patio/decking construction all greater than 15m from the HWL. The only works within the SPEA include the minor grading, removal of a wooden boardwalk and concrete stairs from within 15m of the HWL which will be replace with flagstone steps and bordered with drystack retaining wall which will have a smaller footprint than the existing concrete steps. Plantings are also proposed at the subject property with only native species being planted within 15m of the HWL. The report indicates that the majority of the SPEA is associated with the lake foreshore has been altered from its natural character by previous construction on the site over many years. The Applicant will be required to provide security/bonding for the landscaping as part of the Development Permit requirement.

DISCUSSION: RAR Report The RAR report as submitted by a QEP regarding this project has some very specific recommendations regarding: 1. Encroachment 2. Sediment and Erosion Control 3. Stormwater Management 4. Environmental Monitoring

It is very important to note that a QEP will be required to monitor the project as it is required by the report. (See RAR Report Attachment) Staff has placed the recommendations of the RAR report into the draft Development Permit attached. Neighbourhood Notification Letters were mailed to all surrounding property owners within 100m. Any responses received will be provided at the Council meeting. Earthworks If Council approves this DP the applicant will need to obtain an Earthworks Permit for the works to be conducted on the site(s). The Earthworks Permit will include the requirements as necessitated by the RAR report and the DP.

REPORT/DOCUMENT: Attached: X Available: Nil:

1. Reference Plan 2. Landscape Plan 3. Development Permit DP 13/10,003 ( 6 pages) 4. RAR Report ( 22 pages) 5. Landscape Bonding Letter

OPTIONS: 1. COUNCIL MAY CHOOSE TO APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATION 2. COUNCIL MAY CHOOSE NOT TO APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATION 3. COUNCIL MAY CHOOSE TO REFER THE MATTER BACK TO STAFF FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 110 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B.

SUBJECT PROPERTY

District of Peachland

Civic Addresses: 5261 Buchanan Road Application: DP13/1,0003 – Development Permit for Pool and Landscape in Riparian Area. Legal Description: Lot 3, Applicant(s): Jazel Homes Ltd. Plan 37515, DL 449 Owner(s): Perry and Jacqueline Shivak

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 111 of 181 Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen...

0 5 10 15 20 M

206 - 1889 Spall Road Kelowna, BC V1Y 4R2 T (250) 868-9270 www.outlanddesign.ca

TURF AREA (REFER NOTES) TYP. TYPICAL ALL WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS & SUPERSEDE SCALED DIMENSIONS. P.A. PLANTING AREA (REFER PLANTING PLAN) (N) NEW THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO GIVE THE SITE INSPECTOR 48 HOURS NOTICE BEFORE ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. R.P.A. RIPARIAN PLANTING AREA (REFER PLANTING PLAN) (E) EXISTING X UNIT PAVERS MIN. MINIMUM ALL WORK OF THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK SHOWN ON THE DRAWING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LX VERIFY THE LIMIT OF WORK ON SITE WITH THE SITE INSPECTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CREATE UNIT PAVER BAND X MAX. MAXIMUM ROAD X FENCE COLUMN LX MINIMAL DISTURBANCE WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK WHERE WORK IS NOT REQUIRED. ANY DISTURBANCE TO THESE AREAS SHALL LX (TYP. OF 8) CONCRETE PAVING X TS / BS TOP / BOTTOM OF STAIRS LX BE RESTORED TO A CONDITION GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE EXISTING CONDITION. X X CONC. PAVING CONTROL JOINT TW / BW TOP / BOTTOM OF WALL LX LX THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE SUPERIMPOSED ON A BASE SHEET. THIS BASE SHEET IS X ASPHALT PAVING 471.90 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION LX COMPILED FROM THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, OTHER ARCHITECTURAL AND/OR ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS, AND OTHER DATA X AS MADE AVAILABLE TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL NOT BE HELD LIABLE FOR CHANGES, COBBLE MULCH (471.90) REFERENCED SPOT ELEVATION LX INACCURACIES, OMISSIONS, OR OTHER ERRORS ON THESE DOCUMENTS. THE COMPOSITE BASE SHEET IS PROVIDED AS AN AID BUCHANAN HDR HEADERBOARD X 2% PROPOSED SLOPE / DIRECTION OF FLOW LX ONLY AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING THESE DOCUMENTS AND INCORPORATING/INTEGRATING X ALL CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE SAME. WOOD FENCE LX X METAL RAIL FENCE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING THE UTILITY COMPANIES INVOLVED AND (E) DECIDUOUS TREE (TO LX X REQUESTING A VISUAL VERIFICATION OF THE LOCATIONS OF THEIR UNDERGROUND FACILITIES. MOST UTILITY COMPANIES ARE BE REMOVED) (TYP. OF 5) GLASS RAIL FENCE LX MEMBERS OF THE UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 'CALL BEFORE YOU DIG' PROGRAM. THE CONTRACTOR OR ANY HDR SUBCONTRACTOR FOR THIS CONTRACT SHALL NOTIFY MEMBERS 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF PERFORMING EXCAVATION WORK BY CALLING THE TOLL-FREE NUMBER (800) 474-6886. EXCAVATION IS DEFINED AS BEING 18 OR MORE INCHES IN DEPTH BELOW THE EXISTING SURFACE. THE CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT ONLY EXCAVATION WILL REVEAL THE TYPES, EXTENT, SIZES, LOCATION, AND DEPTHS OF HDR (E) CONIFEROUS TREE (TO BE SUCH UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. HOWEVER, THE CONSULTANT CAN ASSUME NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPLETENESS OR REMOVED) (TYP. OF 3) ACCURACY OF ITS DELINEATION OF SUCH UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, NOR FOR THE EXISTENCE OF OTHER BURIED OBJECTS OR TURF TURF (E) CONC. RETAINING WALL UTILITIES WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. AREA AREA (TO REMIAN) INSTALL EXPANSION JOINTS AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS, AS WELL AS BETWEEN CONCRETE FLATWORK AND BANDS, CURBS, AND EXISTING FLATWORK OR STRUCTURES. P.A.

P.A. ALL CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE CLEAN, STRAIGHT & PERPENDICULAR TO THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT. CONTROL JOINTS PER DETAIL.

REFER TO IRRIGATION PLAN FOR REQUIREMENTS OF SLEEVING UNDER PAVING. TW (355.23) ALL PROPOSED SITE FEATURES SHALL BE STAKED IN FIELD FOR REVIEW BY THE OWNER'S INSPECTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. TW 353.99 ALL CURVES SHALL BE SMOOTH AND CONTINUOUS WITH CAREFULLY MATCHED TANGENTS. BW 352.39

ALL PROPOSED PAVING, TURF AREAS & PLANTING AREAS SHALL SMOOTHLY CONFORM TO EXISTING ADJACENT FEATURES. P.A. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE ON ALL PAVING AND THROUGHOUT ALL PLANTING AREAS. GARAGE TW 351.75 352.39m BW 351.15 REFER PLANTING PLAN N P.A. X CONC. SCULPTURE REFER PLANTING PLAN 1% LX BASE PROPERTY TW (354.66) HEADERBOARD EXCAVATED MATERIAL NOT SUITABLE FOR BACKFILLING SHALL BE REMOVED AND LEGALLY DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE. X X DRYSTACK BOULDER LX (352.19) LX RETAINING WALL (TYP.)

WOOD FENCE X LINE 352.00 TW (351.68) LX 1% PROJECT TITLE / P.A. LIMIT TW 352.50 OF 351.00 P.A. SHIVAK RESIDENCE WORK TW 351.50 TW (350.32) P.A. P.A. TW 351.00 350.00 5261 Buchanan Road P.A. Peachland, BC P.A. P.A. AGL 2 ACER GLABRUM VAR. DOUGLASII DOUGLAS MAPLE #15 CONT. P.A. TW 350.50 TW (349.06) X ASPHALT PAVING DRAWING TITLE HDI 4 HOLODISCUS DISCOLOR OCEANSPRAY #01 CONT. TW 350.00 LX TW (348.29) MAQ 12 MAHONIA AQUIFOLIUM TALL OREGON GRAPE #01 CONT. CUT STONE X TW 349.04 349.00 X GLASS RAIL PFR 17 POTENTILLA FRUITICOSA SHRUBBY CINQUEFOIL #01 CONT. CURB LX LX FENCE LAYOUT & GRADING BW 346.78 TW (347.47) RLA 15 RIBES LACUSTRE BLACK GOOSEBERRY #01 CONT. UNIT PAVERS 346.82m RNU 2 ROSA NUTKANA NOOTKA ROSE #01 CONT. X HDR (E) CONC. RETAINING PLAN (TYP.) LX P.A. UNIT PAVING X 348.00 RWO 8 ROSA WOODSII WOODS ROSE #01 CONT. 352.50m P.A. WALL (TO REMIAN) (TYP.) LX SAL 27 SYMPHORICARPOS ALBA SNOWBERRY #01 CONT. UNIT PAVER 1% X P.A. (E) ASPHALT DRIVEWAY BAND (TYP.) LX RESIDENCE (TO REMIAN) ISSUED FOR / REVISION HDR TW 348.04 1 13.04.09 Review 347.00 P.A. BW 346.66 TW (345.16) 2 HOT TUB 346.69 3 HDR SWIMMING POOL PROPERTY 346.79m 346.73 3% P.A. 4 ROOF OVERHANG (TYP.) 1% 346.54 R.P.A.

HDR 5 TW 346.65 346.00 LINE COBBLE MULCH X TS 346.73 BS 345.83 BW 345.02 (TYP.) LX / (6) RISERS 1% TS 346.70 LIMIT CONC. SLAB PATH 346.73 BS 345.68 X OF PROJECT NO 12-017 LX WORK WOOD FENCE X P.A. DESIGN BY FB LX BOAT DRAWN BY SS P.A. (345.00) P.A. P.A. CHECKED BY FB 346.73 HOUSE R.P.A. DATE APR 9, 2013 1% 346.73 345.76 TS 345.46 TILE DECKING (BY OTHERS) 38% BS (343.92) SCALE 1:200 P.A. TW 346.73 (8) RISERS STRUCTURAL COLUMN (TYP.) P.A. BW 346.28 P.A. TW 346.28 TURF PRE-FABRICATED SAUNA BW 345.83 (343.11) (BY OTHERS) P.A. HDR AREA SEAL 345.76 5% CONC. STAIRS X (TYP.) LX TW 346.50 HDR WOOD TRELLIS BW 345.80 X 38% (343.70) LX P.A. X METAL RAIL LX FENCE TW 346.00 BW 345.76 X DRYSTACK STONE BENCH LX WALL X R.P.A. LX X FLAGSTONE OUTDOOR KITCHEN LX STEPS (BY OTHERS)

(E) WOOD DECK (TO AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FLAGSTONE PAVING REMAIN) X DRAWING NUMBER

Page 112 of 181 LX

FIRE PIT X (E) WOOD BOARDWALK OKANAGAN LX (TO BE REMOVED) LAKE (E) WOOD DOCK (TO BE REMOVED) L1 7

ISSUED FOR REVIEW ONLY Copyright Reserved. This drawing is the property of Outland Design Landscape Architecture Limited and shall not be reproduced, resold, or tendered without permission. AGENDA ITEM # 9.B.

DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND

APPROVED ISSUANCE OF A:

[X] Development Permit No. ____DP13/10,003____ [ ] Development Variance Permit No. ______

EXISTING ZONING DESIGNATION: _R-1 Single Family Residential

WITHIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREA: Environmentally Sensitive Area

ISSUED TO: Perry Shivak (Zeleznik)______

LOCATION OF SUBJECT SITE: 5261 Buchanan Road______

LEGAL LOT # BLOCK PLAN DISTRICT DISTRICT DESCRIPTION LOT

3 KAP37515 449

SCOPE OF APPROVAL

[X] This Permit applies to and only to those lands within the Municipality as described above, and any and all buildings, structures and other development thereon.

[X] This Permit is issued subject to compliance with all of the Bylaws of the Municipality applicable thereto, except as specifically varied or supplemented by this Permit noted in the Terms and Conditions below.

[X] Applicants for Development and Development Variance Permit should be aware that the issuance of a Permit limits the applicant to be in strict compliance with regulations of the Zoning Bylaw or Subdivision Control Bylaw unless specific Variances have been authorized by the Permit. No implied Variances from Bylaw provisions shall be granted by virtue of drawing notations which are inconsistent with Bylaw provisions and which may not have been identified as required Variances by the applicant or District staff.

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 113 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B.

1. TERMS AND CONDITIONS:

The applicant intends to construct a pool, and associated landscaping, retaining walls, patio, ornamental planting within the 30 m. Riparian Regulation Assessment Area which triggers the requirement for an Environmentally Sensitive Development Permit. The Qualified Environmental Professional (QEP) should be retained to be on site to document compliance with the proposed mitigation measures and to provide guidance during the proposed works adjacent to Okanagan Lake. The detailed recommendations are attached as part of the Riparian Area Regulations Assessment Report Schedule “A”. The following requirements summarize the requirements to mitigate the impact of this encroachment.

(a) A Silt fence should be installed along the SPEA boundary to mitigate the risks to aquatic resources associated with potential runoff and sediment transport. Silt fences should be staked into the ground and trenched a minimum of 15 cm to prevent flow beneath. Silt fencing should be monitored on a regular basis and any damages or areas where the Silt fence must remain in place until all demolition and/or construction activities are complete.

(b) All construction debris must be kept outside the 15m SPEA and should be removed from the property on a regular basis.

(c) Stockpiling of fill material within the 15m SPEA must not occur. Any fill material, if required for construction, must be located outside the SPEA beyond the silt fence. If material will be stockpiled near or adjacent to the SPEA for an extended period of time, it must be covered with polyethylene sheeting or similar material to prevent the stockpile from eroding and carrying sediment laden runoff into the lake.

(d) Sediments, debris concrete, concrete fines, or wash water associated with pouring of the concrete must not come into contact with Okanagan Lake or be discharged within the 15m SPEA. The concrete cast in place must remain inside sealed formed structures until cured and any runoff associated with cast in place concrete must be controlled so that is does not flow into the lake.

(e) No equipment refuelling or servicing should be undertaken within 30 m of Okanagan Lake. A staging location for equipment maintenance and fuelling should be established at least 30 m from Okanagan Lake and used for the duration of construction activities.

(f) A spill containment kit should be kept readily available onsite during construction in case of the accidental release of a deleterious substance to the environment. Any spills of a toxic substance should be immediately reported to the Provincial Emergency Program 24 hour hotline at 1-800-663-3456

(g) No beach grooming, additional of sand, removal of cobble/boulders, or removal of

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 114 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B.

riparian vegetation should occur at any time. No dredging or placement of fill below the lake high water level (343m geodetic) should occur at any time.

(h) Stormwater will not be discharged to Okanagan Lake as part of the proposed development. Also there should be no discharge of pool water to Okanagan Lake. Alternatively, pool water must be de-chlorinated, prior to slow release to a vegetated area in order to avoid the potential for surface runoff entering Okanagan Lake or erosion within the SPEA.

(i) Recommendations with respect to the proposed plantings as shown on plan prepared by Outline Design landscape Architecture dated December 14, 2012 and attached as Schedule “B” include the following;

a. Temporary irrigation should be installed, with watering occurring for the first 2 growing seasons until plans are established, hand watering or drip irrigation are acceptable; b. Survival criteria of 80% of the native plants over a 2 year period should be required. c. Any tree removals within the SPEA are subject to tree replacement criteria and compensation plantings would be required. d. Upon completion of the proposed works, invasive plant species should be removed from the disturbed area and the SPEA without the use of chemical pesticides/herbicides and fertilisers. Invasive species should be pulled by hand.

(j) Proposed works will be conducted beyond the Okanagan Lake floodplain.

(k) Ecoscape Environmental Consultants Ltd. will ensure that all required notifications are filed with the appropriate regulatory agencies.

(l) An environment monitor (EM should be retained to provide documentation and guidance during construction activities and during implementation of erosion and sediment control measures. In the event that greater disturbance occurs due to unforeseen circumstances, the monitor should recommend further measures (3e.g., erosion and sediment control) to protect/restore the natural integrity of the site. The EM should also be authorized to halt construction activities should an incident arise that is causing undue harm (unforeseen or from lack of due care) to terrestrial, aquatic or riparian resource values. The EM duties and schedule will include as a minimum the following:

i. A pre-construction meeting will be held prior to implementation of works. During this visit, best management practices and erosion and sediment control measures will be reviewed;

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 115 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B.

ii. Visits should be conducted monthly during construction and will target higher risk activities. The EM should be notified prior to concrete works associated with the pool construction so they can schedule visits accordingly. The EM should be contracted prior to initiating landscaping to review plant species and placement prior to implementation.

iii. Environmental monitoring reports will be generated for each monitoring visit and submitted to the client, contractor(s), the District of Peachland and relevant regulator(s); and

iv. Following completion of the project, a substantial completion report will be submitted to the client, the District of Peachland and regulator(s).

(m) Development of this site shall not commence until an Earthworks permit has been approved and issued by the District. The Earthworks permit must reflect the intent of the recommendation set out in the geotechnical and RAR assessment.

(n) Development of this site will require building permits to be issued pursuant to BC Building Code and the District’s Building Bylaw.

(o) Any retaining wall(s) proposed to be built within the rear yard setback will require the Director of Planning and Development Services to approve the aesthetic nature of that wall(s) prior to a building permit for such works being issued.

2. The development shall commence by and in accordance with an approved building Permit within ONE YEAR of the date of the Municipal Council authorization resolution.

3. PERFORMANCE SECURITY:

As a condition of the issuance of this Permit, Council is holding the security set out below to ensure that development is carried out in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Permit. Should any interest be earned upon the security, it shall accrue to the Permittee and be paid to the Permittee if the security is returned. The condition of the posting of the security is that should the Permittee fail to carry out the development hereby authorized, according to the terms and conditions of this Permit within the time provided, the Municipality may use the security to carry out the work by its servants, agents or contractors, and any surplus shall be paid over to the Permittee, or should the Permittee carry out the development Permitted by this Permit within the time set out above, the security shall be returned to the Permittee. There is filed accordingly:

(a) Cash in the amount of $___NIL______.

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 116 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B.

(b) A Certified Cheque in the amount of $ 4,701.50 .

(c) An Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $____NIL______.

Before any bond or security required under this Permit is reduced or released, the Developer will provide the District with a statutory declaration certifying that all labour, material, workers' compensation and other taxes and costs have been paid.

4. DEVELOPMENT;

The land described herein shall be developed strictly in accordance with the terms and conditions and provisions of this Permit and any plans and specifications attached to this Permit which shall form a part hereof.

If the Permittee does not commence the development Permitted by this Permit within one year of the date of this Permit, this Permit shall lapse. This Permit is not transferrable unless specifically Permitted by the Municipality. The Authorization to transfer the Permit shall, if deemed acceptable, be granted by Council resolution.

THIS Permit IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT.

5. APPLICANT'S AGREEMENT:

I hereby declare that all the above statements and the information contained in the material submitted in support of this Permit are to the best of my belief, true and correct in all respects. Upon issuance of the Permit for me by the Municipality, then in such case, I covenant and agree to save harmless and effectually indemnify the Municipality against:

(a) All actions and proceedings, costs, damages, expenses, claims, and demands whatsoever and by whomsoever brought, by reason of the Municipality granting to me the said Permit.

(b) All costs, expenses, claims that may be incurred by the Municipality if the construction by me of engineering or other types of works as called for by the Permit results in damages to any property owned in whole or in part by the Municipality or which the Municipality by duty or custom is obligated, directly or indirectly in any way or to any degree, to construct, repair, or maintain.

I further covenant and agree that should I be granted a Development Permit or Development Variance Permit, the Municipality may withhold granting of any occupancy Permit for the occupancy and/or use of any building or part thereof constructed upon the hereinbefore referred to land until all of the engineering works or other works called for by the Permit have been

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 117 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B.

completed to the satisfaction of the Municipal Engineer and Director of Planning and Development Services.

Should there be any changes in ownership or legal description of the property, I undertake to notify the Planning and Development Services Department immediately to avoid any unnecessary delay in processing the application.

I HEREBY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE TO ALL THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED IN THIS PERMIT.

______Signature of Owner/Authorized Agent Date

______Print Name in Bold Letters Telephone No.

Personal information collected on this form is collected for the purposes of processing this application and for administration and enforcement. The personal information is collected under the authority of the B.C. Municipal Legislation, and the District of Peachland's bylaws. If you have any questions about this collection, contact the District Clerk, Municipality of Peachland, 5806 Beach Avenue, Peachland, B.C. V0H 1X7, 1-250-767-2647.

6. APPROVALS:

AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION PASSED BY THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THE ______DAY OF ______2013.

ISSUED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND THE ______DAY OF ______2013.

______Dave Smith, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning & Development Services

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 118 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FORM 1 Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report

Riparian Areas Regulation: Assessment Report Please refer to submission instructions and assessment report guidelines when completing this report. Date 2012-12-17

I. Primary QEP Information First Name Angela Middle Name G. Last Name Cormano Designation RPF, RPBio Company Ecoscape Environmental Consultants Ltd Registration # RPF #4328, Email [email protected] RPBio #1900 Address #102-450 Neave Court City Kelowna V1V 2M2 Phone # 250-491-7337 ext 214 Prov/state BC Country Canada

II. Secondary QEP Information (use Form 2 for other QEPs) First Name Middle Name Last Name Designation Company Registration # Email Address City Postal/Zip Phone # Prov/state Country

III. Developer Information First Name Perry and Jackie Middle Name Last Name Shivak Company NA Phone # NA Email: [email protected] Address 5261 Buchanan Road City Peachland Postal/Zip V0H1X1 Prov/state BC Country Canada

IV. Development Information Development Type Landscaping Area of Development (ha) 0.31 Riparian Length (m) ~32 m Lot Area (ha) 0.05 Nature of Development Redevelopment Proposed Start Date ASAP Proposed End Date 12/31/2013 (12/21/2012)

V. Location of Proposed Development Street Address (or nearest town) Lot 3, Plan 37515 Local Government District of Peachland City Peachland Stream Name Okanagan Lake Legal Description (PID) 005-594-251 Region Okanagan Stream/River Type Lake DFO Area BC Interior Watershed Code 310 Latitude 49° 47’ 33.68” N Longitude 119° 42’ 01.71” W

Completion of Database Information includes the Form 2 for the Additional QEPs, if needed. Insert that form immediately after this page.

Form 1 Page 1 of 20 Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 119 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FORM 1 Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report

Table of Contents for Assessment Report Page Number

1. Description of Fisheries Resources Values ……………………………….3

2. Results of Riparian Assessment (SPEA width) …………………………...6

3. Site Plan ……………………………………………………………………….8 (also refer to Landscape Plan – Appendix B).

4. Measures to Protect and Maintain the SPEA (detailed methodology only). 1. Danger Trees…………………………………………………………………9 2. Windthrow………………………………………………………………….....9 3. Slope Stability…………………………………………………………...……9 4. Protection of Trees………………………………………………….……….9 5. Encroachment …………………………………………………………….…9 6. Sediment and Erosion Control………………………………………..……10 7. Floodplain………………………………………………………………..…...11 8. Stormwater Management………………………………………….……12

5. Environmental Monitoring ……………………………………………….….13

6. Photos …………………………………………………………………….…...14

7. Assessment Report Professional Opinion ……………………………………18

Form 1 Page 2 of 20 Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 120 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FORM 1 Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report

Section 1. Description of Fisheries Resources Values and a Description of the Development proposal

Background and Proposed Development

The subject property is legally described as Lot 3, Plan 37515 (Figure 1). A survey of the site has been completed and is attached as Appendix A. House construction is currently occurring at the subject property; however, this work was not within 30m of the high water level (HWL) of Okanagan Lake, and it is understood that the District of Peachland did not require a Riparian Areas Regulation assessment to be completed. The proposed development consists of a pool construction and landscaping within 30m of the HWL of Okanagan Lake; the proposed works are detailed on the landscaping plan attached as Appendix B. Details of the proposed works include installation of a pool, hot tub, pizza oven and patio/decking construction (all greater than 15m from the HWL). In addition, the proposed works involve the removal of a wooden boardwalk and concrete stairs from within 15m of the HWL. It is proposed the stairs will be replaced with flagstone steps (and bordered with dry stack wall) which will have a smaller footprint than the existing concrete steps. Plantings are also proposed at the subject property with only native species being planted within 15m of the HWL. It is understood that the existing dock will be removed and reconstructed along the eastern side of the subject property. A separate report is being prepared and a Development Permit (through the District of Peachland) and Section 9 application will be submitted for the proposed dock removal and construction.

The subject property, occurs along the western shoreline of Okanagan Lake and is within the District of Peachland. Therefore the District of Peachland Official Community Plan (OCP) is applicable at this site (November, 2011). This OCP requires a Foreshore Areas Development Permit and Riparian Areas Regulation (RAR) submission as the subject property is within 30 m of a watercourse.

The RAR indicates that the proximity of the subject property to Okanagan Lake requires a detailed assessment by a Qualified Environmental Professional (QEP) to determine the Streamside Protection and Enhancement Area (SPEA) setbacks from the HWL of Okanagan Lake (Figure 2). A site assessment of the subject property was completed by Katrina Gousmett, B.Sc., B.I.T., Natural Resource Biologist with Ecoscape on October 19, 2012.

The subject property currently contains a new house (being constructed out of the 30 m RAR assessment area), a patio area and landscaped garden (Photos 1 and 2). Within the riparian/foreshore area there is an existing boat house (and ramp to the lake), boat launch, concrete retaining wall and stairs, deck area and dock (Photos 3 and 4).

The determined SPEA for the subject property is 15 m (setback from the HWL of Okanagan Lake) based on the Litter Fall and Insect Drop and Large Woody Debris zones of sensitivity. The proposed development covers an area of approximately 571 m2 and the SPEA has an area of approximately 481 m2 (Figure 2 and Appendix B). The only works within the SPEA include minor regrading, removal of a wooden boardwalk (approximately 34 m2), removal of concrete stairs accessing the foreshore and replacement with a smaller set of flagstone steps (bordered by a dry stack wall) and native plantings. Proposed native plantings will encompass a total area of 93m2 and will include 3 native trees and 62 native shrubs

Form 1 Page 3 of 20

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 121 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FORM 1 Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report

(detailed on the Landscape Plan attached as Appendix B). In addition, the proposed works includes planting out of the SPEA with non-native plants. The existing dock will also be removed and reconstructed along the eastern side of the subject property, below the HWL.

Timelines

Timelines for the completion of the project are dependent upon permitting and approvals from the District of Peachland and the Province. Ecoscape understands that the Development Permit (DP) application process typically ranges between 4-6 weeks, and the contractor will begin works as soon as the appropriate approvals are in place. It is our understanding that the pool construction and restoration works will not take more than approximately 6 months.

Riparian Condition

The riparian vegetation at the subject property consisted predominantly of turf with ornamental shrubs including cedar species (Photo 2).

The subject property occurs along Okanagan Lake Foreshore Inventory and Mapping (FIM) Segment 272 and is described as coniferous forest with a high level of impact (Schleppe, 2010). Land use at the time of the FIM survey was described as single family with disturbance occurring over 80% of this 495 m segment (Schleppe, 2010). The shore type along the segment is described as a gravel and substrates in the nearshore area were reported as 45% gravel, 50% sand and 5% boulder, while the littoral zone width was documented as moderate (10-50m) (Schleppe, 2010). The dock density along this segment was documented at a density of 20.2 docks/km (Schleppe, 2010). The FIM description is generally consistent with the condition of the subject property, although the subject property is largely landscaped and does not consist of coniferous forest. The condition of the riparian area of the subject property is generally consistent with properties to the north and south. During the site visit, the foreshore substrates at the subject property were recorded as 25% gravel and 75% sand (Photo 5).

Fisheries Values

Kokanee (Oncorhynchus nerka) are the fish species of primary management concern with respect to shoreline development and aquatic habitat alteration along Okanagan Lake. A review of zoning information for Okanagan Lake, as of November, 2012, revealed that the majority of the subject property is located within a Provincial foreshore protocol No Colour Zone, (BC MoE, 2009) (Figure 1). The No Colour Zone indicates that there has been no recent or historic observed kokanee shore spawning activity within this area (BC MoE, 2009).

The subject property is located approximately 2.9 kilometres from the nearest documented kokanee shore spawning location; this was recorded as being an area with approximately 400 shore spawning kokanee in 1979 (BC MoE, 2012).

The current Aquatic Habitat Index (AHI) rating along this shoreline segment is described as low with the potential AHI rating described as moderate (Schleppe, 2010). The AHI criteria described juvenile rearing potential as moderate, with no migration or staging occurring

Form 1 Page 4 of 20

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 122 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FORM 1 Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report

(Schleppe, 2010). While shore spawning kokanee have not previously been documented along the subject property, substrates may provide suitable spawning, foraging and general living habitat for a number of fish species. Table 1 details the fish species documented to occur in Okanagan Lake.

Table 1. Fish Species found in Okanagan Lake (BC MFLNRO, 2012). Common Name Scientific Name Eastern Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis Burbot Lota lota Carp Cyprinus carpio Chiselmouth Acrocheilus alutaceus Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus clarki lewisi Kokanee Oncorhynchus nerka Lake Trout Salvelinus namaycush Lake Whitefish Coregonus clupeaformis Largescale Sucker Catostomus macrocheilus Leopard Dace Rhinichthys falcatus Longnose Dace Rhinichthys cataractae Longnose Sucker Catostomus catostomus Mountain Whitefish Prosopium williamsoni Northern Pikeminnow Ptychocheilus oregonensis Peamouth Chub Mylocheilus caurinus Prickly Sculpin Cottus asper Pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus Pygmy Whitefish Prosopium coulteri Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss Redside Shiner Richardsonius balteatus Slimy Sculpin Cottus cognatus Steelhead Oncorhynchus mykiss Smallmouth Bass Micropterus dolomieu Yellow Perch Perca flavescens

Form 1 Page 5 of 20

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 123 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FORM 1 Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report

2. Results of Detailed Riparian Assessment Refer to Chapter 3 of Assessment Methodology Date: 2012-12-17 Description of Water bodies involved (number, type) Okanagan Lake Stream Wetland Lake X Ditch Number of reaches 1 Reach # 1

Channel width and slope and Channel Type (use only if water body is a stream or a ditch, and only provide widths if a ditch) Channel Width(m) Gradient (%) starting point I, Angela Cormano , hereby certify that: upstream a) I am a qualified environmental professional, as defined in the Riparian Areas Regulation made under the Fish Protection Act; b) I am qualified to carry out this part of the assessment of the development proposal made by the developer, Perry and Jackie Shivak; c) I have carried out an assessment of the development proposal downstream and my assessment is set out in this Assessment Report; and d) In carrying out my assessment of the development proposal, I have followed the assessment methods set out in the Schedule to the Riparian Areas Regulation.

Total: minus high /low mean R/P C/P S/P Channel Type

Site Potential Vegetation Type (SPVT) Yes No SPVT Polygons X Tick yes only if multiple polygons, if No then fill in one set of SPVT data boxes I, Angela Cormano, hereby certify that: a) I am a qualified environmental professional, as defined in the Riparian Areas Regulation made under the Fish Protection Act; b) I am qualified to carry out this part of the assessment of the development proposal made by the developer, Perry and Jackie Shivak; c) I have carried out an assessment of the development proposal and my assessment is set out in this Assessment Report; and d) In carrying out my assessment of the development proposal, I have followed the assessment methods set out in the Schedule to the Riparian Areas Regulation. Polygon No: 1 Method employed if other than TR LC SH TR SPVT Type X

Polygon No: Method employed if other than TR LC SH TR SPVT Type

Polygon No: Method employed if other than TR

Form 1 Page 6 of 20

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 124 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FORM 1 Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report

SPVT Type

Zone of Sensitivity (ZOS) and resultant SPEA Segment 1 If two sides of a stream involved, each side is a separate segment. For all water No: bodies multiple segments occur where there are multiple SPVT polygons LWD, Bank and Channel 15 Stability ZOS (m) Litter fall and insect drop 15 ZOS (m) Shade ZOS (m) max 30 South bank Yes No X Ditch Justification description for classifying as a ditch (manmade, no significant headwaters or springs, seasonal flow) Ditch Fish Yes No If non-fish bearing insert no fish Bearing bearing status report SPEA maximum 15 m (For ditch use table3-7)

I, Angela Cormano, hereby certify that: a) I am a qualified environmental professional, as defined in the Riparian Areas Regulation made under the Fish Protection Act; b) I am qualified to carry out this part of the assessment of the development proposal made by the developer, Perry and Jackie Shivak ; c) I have carried out an assessment of the development proposal and my assessment is set out in this Assessment Report; and d) In carrying out my assessment of the development proposal, I have followed the assessment methods set out in the Schedule to the Riparian Areas Regulation.

Comments The RAR utilizes a number of factors to determine setbacks based on the site potential vegetation type (SPVT) including large woody debris (LWD), bank and channel stability, shade and litter fall and insect drop. As determined during the site visit, the SPVT for the subject property is “Treed”. The resulting zone of sensitivity (ZOS) for LWD, bank and channel stability is 15 metres. The ZOS for litter fall and insect drop for lakes with a SPVT of treed is 15 metres. The shade setback for lakes with a SPVT of treed is 30 metres offset due south. The greatest or most conservative zone of sensitivity offset results in the SPEA. In this case, the specified SPEA width equals 15 m from the present natural boundary of Okanagan Lake. The ZOS and SPEA are shown on Figure 2.

Form 1 Page 7 of 20

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 125 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FORM 1 Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report

Section 3. Site Plan (Figures)

Figure 1-Site Location and Fisheries Information Figure 2-Riparian Areas Regulation (RAR) Assessment

Form 1 Page 8 of 20

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 126 of 181 Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen...

Cent ral Ok an ag an J Cent ral 1:5,000 1:250,000 Ok an ag an Traders

d Ellison s R e Cr Cove n ell e rn d o L y r D Kelowna Rutland d son Pl Westside R Robin 33 d ShawRd n la r e h t 97 d u R S Shaw Rd Ke lo w na h Glenrosa c n 271 e We st Westbank B 97C r Ke lo w na ie Clarence Rd !( n a p e r Greata Rd T Okanagan Mission

Huston Rd Peachland Subject Property Lang Rd Ta ilyo u Braeloch r e L a m n P e a c h l a n d a e n

o Highway 97 n

d O R n a n 272 k a h a c n u B a g a n Eyre Rd F L u a lt o k n e P Location of l Okanagan-Similkameen E Proposed Works Koo te nay

!( Okanagan-Similkameen F Bo un dary E

d R

h Summerland c

n Naramata

e B Pe n t ic t o n Sum m e rla n d

r 1 e i 273 n

a

p

e FIGURE 1

r T Okanagan Site Location and Fisheries Information Beach Ave Lake Project: Environmental Assessment Location: District of Peachland Project No.: 12-998 Prepared for: Perry and Jackie Shivak AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. Kokanee Prepared by: Ecoscape Environmental Consultants Ltd. !( Yellow Drawn by: Robert Wagner Page 127 of 181 Checked by: Katrina Gousmett Zo ne Projection: NAD83-UTM Zone 11 Date: October 22, 2012 LEGEND · Places Subject Property !( Segment Break Municipal Boundary Foreshore Inventory and Mapping (FIM) Regional Location of Subject Property DISCLAIMER274 District of Peachland Ministry of Environment - Kokanee Yellow Zone The data displayed is for conceptual purposes only and Major Highway should not be interpreted as a legal survey or for legal Streams and Rivers Ministry of Environment - Kokanee Red Zone purposes. If discrepancies are found between the data Major Roads Lake Ministry of Environment - Kokanee Black Zone portrayed in this report and that of a legal survey, the legal survey will supersede any data presented herein. Cadastre

!(

!( Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen...

305570 305580 305590 305600 305610 305620 305630 305640 305650 305660 305670 305680 305690 305700 305710 305720 305730 305740 305750 305760 5235 5519160 5519160 5270

5247 5519150 5519150

Buchanan Rd 5255 5251 5519140 5519140

5261 5519130 5519130 5519120 5519120 Okanagan 30 Metre Riparian Areas Streamside Protection and Lake 5519110 Regulation Assessment Area 5519110 Enhancement Area (SPEA) (481 Square Metres) 5519100 5519100

5265 5519090 5519090 FIGURE 2 Setback Assessment

Project: Environmental Assessment Location: District of Peachland 5519080 5519080 Project No.: 12-998 Prepared for: Perry and Jackie Shivak Zone of Sensitivity - Large Prepared by: Ecoscape Environmental Consultants Ltd. Woody Debris (15 Metres) Drawn by: Robert Wagner Checked by: Katrina Gousmett

5519070 Projection: NAD83-UTM Zone 11 5519070 Date: October 22, 2012

Zone of Sensitivity - Litter Fall · AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. LEGEND and Insect Drop (15 Metres) Subject Property Boundary Page 128 of 181 Present Natural 5271 Zone of Sensitivity - Shade Cadastre 5519060 Boundary 5519060 (30 Metres Due South) Present Natural Boundary 30 Metre Riparian Areas Regulation Assessment Area Zone of Sensitivity - Large Woody Debris (15 Metres) Zone of Sensitivity - Litter Fall and Insect Drop (15 Metres)

5519050 Zone of Sensitivity - Shade (30 Metres Due South) 5519050 DISCLAIMER Streamside Protection and Enhancement Area (SPEA) The data displayed in this figure is for conceptual purposes 10 5 0 10 20 30 Meters only and should not be interpreted as a legal survey or for legal5275 purposes. If discrepancies are found between the data portrayed in this report and that of a legal survey, the legal 5519040 survey will supersede any data presented herein. 1:500 5519040

305570 305580 305590 305600 305610 305620 305630 305640 305650 305660 305670 305680 305690 305700 305710 305720 305730 305740 305750 305760 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FORM 1 Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report

Section 4. Measures to Protect and Maintain the SPEA

1. Danger Trees A danger tree assessment was not conducted within the subject property. No mature trees are located within the SPEA. There is a willow located to the east of the existing boat shed, however, this is located on the neighbouring property.

I, Angela Cormano , hereby certify that: e) I am a qualified environmental professional, as defined in the Riparian Areas Regulation made under the Fish Protection Act; f) I am qualified to carry out this part of the assessment of the development proposal made by the developer, Perry and Jackie Shivak; g) I have carried out an assessment of the development proposal and my assessment is set out in this Assessment Report; and In carrying out my assessment of the development proposal, I have followed the assessment methods set out in the Schedule to the Riparian Areas Regulation 2. Windthrow Windthrow is not considered to be a significant concern on the subject property as there are no mature trees within the SPEA.

I, Angela Cormano, hereby certify that: a. I am a qualified environmental professional, as defined in the Riparian Areas Regulation made under the Fish Protection Act; b. I am qualified to carry out this part of the assessment of the development proposal made by the developer, Perry and Jackie Shivak; c. I have carried out an assessment of the development proposal and my assessment is set out in this Assessment Report; and In carrying out my assessment of the development proposal, I have followed the assessment methods set out in the Schedule to the Riparian Areas Regulation 3. Slope Stability The subject property has a relatively low gradient and there is an existing concrete retaining wall located at the subject property. No field indicators are present that would identify issues associated with slope stability.

I, Angela Cormano, hereby certify that: a. I am a qualified environmental professional, as defined in the Riparian Areas Regulation made under the Fish Protection Act; b. I am qualified to carry out this part of the assessment of the development proposal made by the developer, Perry and Jackie Shivak; c. I have carried out an assessment of the development proposal and my assessment is set out in this Assessment Report; and In carrying out my assessment of the development proposal, I have followed the assessment methods set out in the Schedule to the Riparian Areas Regulation 4. Protection of Trees Removal of existing trees is not proposed within the SPEA, it is understood that some existing ornamental cedars that create a hedge along the western property boundary may be removed; however these are located out of the SPEA. In addition, the proposed works involves restoration through removal of hardscaping and planting of native plants and some deciduous trees (Douglas maple) within the SPEA that will result in an improvement to the natural condition of the SPEA.

I, Angela Cormano, hereby certify that: a. I am a qualified environmental professional, as defined in the Riparian Areas Regulation made under the Fish Protection Act; b. I am qualified to carry out this part of the assessment of the development proposal made by the developer, Perry and Jackie Shivak ; c. I have carried out an assessment of the development proposal and my assessment is set out in this Assessment Report; and In carrying out my assessment of the development proposal, I have followed the assessment methods set out in the Schedule to the Riparian Areas Regulation 5. Encroachment The majority of the proposed works occur outside of the SPEA, this is with the exception of minor regrading, removal of a wooden boardwalk (approximately 34 m2), removal of concrete stairs accessing the foreshore and replacement with a smaller set of flagstone steps (and bordered by a dry stack wall) and native plantings. The proposed works are detailed in the Landscape Plan

Form 1 Page 9 of 20

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 129 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FORM 1 Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report

(Appendix B). Plantings include a total of 3 native trees and 62 native shrubs over an area of 93m2 within the SPEA and additional non-native plantings occurring out of the SPEA. Due to the removal of existing hardscaping within the SPEA and proposed native plantings within the SPEA and additional plantings at the site, it is considered that upon completion of the proposed works there will be an overall net gain in habitat condition within the SPEA resulting in an improvement to the natural conditions at the subject property.

The following details recommendations for the proposed plantings:

 Temporary irrigation should be installed, with watering occurring for the first 2 growing seasons, until plants are established. Hand watering and drip irrigation are both acceptable methods. Care should be taken during watering to ensure that overland flows do not result in sedimentation to Okanagan Lake.

 A survival criteria of 80% of the native plants over a 2 year period should be required. Plant stock grown within the Thompson-Okanagan region and grown from seed found within the region (i.e. local source) is recommended to help facilitate and promote plant growth and survival.

 Any tree removals within the SPEA are subject to tree replacement criteria, and compensation plantings would be required. However, there are no mature trees currently within the SPEA.

 Upon the completion of the proposed works, invasive plant species should be removed from any disturbed areas and the SPEA. Given the proximity to Okanagan lake, chemical pesticides/herbicides and fertilizers should not be used. Furthermore, it is recommended that invasive species are pulled by hand.

 Any changes to the attached landscape plan (Appendix B) must be reviewed and approved by Ecoscape prior to implementation.

I, Angela Cormano, hereby certify that: a. I am a qualified environmental professional, as defined in the Riparian Areas Regulation made under the Fish Protection Act; b. I am qualified to carry out this part of the assessment of the development proposal made by the developer, Perry and Jackie Shivak; c. I have carried out an assessment of the development proposal and my assessment is set out in this Assessment Report; and In carrying out my assessment of the development proposal, I have followed the assessment methods set out in the Schedule to the Riparian Areas Regulation 6. Sediment and Erosion Control The following recommendations address minimizing the potential for the introduction of deleterious substances to Okanagan Lake. These recommendations must be adhered to throughout all stages of the proposed works at the subject property including restoration plantings.

 The 15 m SPEA boundary must both be marked in the field by a land surveyor and clearly delineated in the field prior to initiating construction works. Snow fence, flagging or a similar, suitable barrier must be installed along the length of the setback throughout the duration of construction and restoration works. This will ensure that no unnecessary encroachment/disturbance occurs within the setback. It is understood that works will be occurring within the SPEA, however, delineation of the setback should be provided.

 The release of fine sediments, concrete-laden water or other substances deleterious to the environment (e.g., gasoline) must be prevented.

Form 1 Page 10 of 20

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 130 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FORM 1 Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report

 Silt fence/filter fabric must be installed between the proposed works and Okanagan Lake, it is recommended that the silt fence is installed immediately adjacent to limit of disturbance (along the top of the existing concrete retaining wall). Silt fence is required to mitigate the risks to aquatic resources associated with runoff and sediment transport. Silt fence must be staked into the ground and trenched a minimum of 15 centimetres to prevent flow underneath the fence and must remain taut to prevent material from moving over the fence. Silt fencing should contain sufficient storage capacity to collect runoff and sediment deposition during storm events. Ongoing monitoring and maintenance of the silt fence must occur on a regular basis to ensure adequate function.

 All construction debris must be kept outside of the 15 m SPEA and should be removed from the property on a regular basis.

 Stockpiling of fill material within the 15 m SPEA must not occur. Any fill material, if required for construction, must be located outside of the SPEA beyond the silt fence. If material will be stockpiled near or adjacent to the SPEA for an extended period of time, it may need to be covered with polyethylene sheeting or a similar material to prevent the stockpile from eroding and carrying sediment laden runoff into the lake.

 Ensure that on-site machinery is in good operating condition, clean, and free of leaks, excess oil or grease. No equipment refueling or servicing should be undertaken within 30 m of Okanagan Lake.

 Spill containment kits should be kept readily available if any equipment (ie. excavator) is used during construction in case of the accidental release of a deleterious substance to the environment. The number of spill kits on site will be dependent on the amount of machinery. Any spills of a toxic substance of a reportable quantity as defined by the Spill Reporting Regulation should be immediately reported to the Provincial Emergency Program 24 hour hotline at 1-800-663-3456 and the District of Peachland.

 Sediments, debris, concrete, concrete fines, or wash water associated with pouring of the concrete must not come into contact with Okanagan Lake or be discharged within the 15 m SPEA. The concrete cast in place must remain inside sealed formed structures until cured and any runoff associated with cast in place concrete must be controlled so that it does not flow into the lake.

 Equipment and tools used in construction must be washed off site away from any watercourses. Concrete waste water must not be washed into any watercourse or the storm water system (i.e. must not be poured in a location that drains into municipal catch basins and subsequently into watercourses).

 No beach grooming, addition of sand, removal of cobbles/boulders, or removal of riparian vegetation should occur at any time. No dredging or placement of fill below the lake high water level (343 m geodetic) should occur at any time.

I, Angela Cormano, hereby certify that:  I am a qualified environmental professional, as defined in the Riparian Areas Regulation made under the Fish Protection Act;  I am qualified to carry out this part of the assessment of the development proposal made by the developer, Perry and Jackie Shivak;  I have carried out an assessment of the development proposal and my assessment is set out in this Assessment Report; and In carrying out my assessment of the development proposal, I have followed the assessment methods set out in the Schedule to the Riparian Areas Regulation

Form 1 Page 11 of 20

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 131 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FORM 1 Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report

7. Stormwater Management There will be no change to the discharge of stormwater to Okanagan Lake from the proposed works. However, it is critical to note that there should also be no discharge of pool water to Okanagan Lake. Alternatively, pool water must be de-chlorinated, prior to a slow release to a vegetated area in order to avoid the potential for surface runoff entering Okanagan Lake or erosion within the SPEA.

I, Angela Cormano, hereby certify that: a. I am a qualified environmental professional, as defined in the Riparian Areas Regulation made under the Fish Protection Act; b. I am qualified to carry out this part of the assessment of the development proposal made by the developer, Perry and Jackie Shivak; c. I have carried out an assessment of the development proposal and my assessment is set out in this Assessment Report; and In carrying out my assessment of the development proposal, I have followed the assessment methods set out in the Schedule to the Riparian Areas Regulation 8. Floodplain Concerns (highly mobile channel) The major proposed works will occur above the active floodplain elevation of Okanagan Lake, and therefore, floodplain concerns are not applicable.

I, Angela Cormano, hereby certify that: a. I am a qualified environmental professional, as defined in the Riparian Areas Regulation made under the Fish Protection Act; b. I am qualified to carry out this part of the assessment of the development proposal made by the developer, Perry and Jackie Shivak ; c. I have carried out an assessment of the development proposal and my assessment is set out in this Assessment Report; and In carrying out my assessment of the development proposal, I have followed the assessment methods set out in the Schedule to the Riparian Areas Regulation

Form 1 Page 12 of 20

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 132 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FORM 1 Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report

Section 5. Environmental Monitoring

An environmental monitor (EM) should be retained to be on site to document compliance with proposed mitigation measures and to provide guidance during the proposed works adjacent Okanagan Lake, particularly in reference to the implementation of erosion and sediment control measures. In the event that greater disturbance occurs due to unforeseen circumstances, the EM should recommend further measures to protect/restore the natural integrity of the site. The environmental monitor should also document the substantial completion of the project and provide a brief report to the client and District of Peachland for their records.

The monitor’s duties and schedule would include, as a minimum, the following:

1. Pre-construction meeting prior to the implementation of works. During this visit, best management practices and erosion and sediment control measures will be reviewed.

2. Visits should be conducted monthly during construction and will target higher risk activities. The EM should be notified prior to concrete works associated with the pool construction, so they can schedule site visits accordingly. The EM should also be contacted prior to initiating landscaping to review plant species and placement prior to implementation.

3. Environmental monitoring reports will be generated for each visit and submitted to District of Peachland; submission to Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations will occur if necessary.

4. Following completion of the project, a substantial completion report will be prepared. The District of Peachland may wish to ensure completion of monitoring by collection of a monitoring or performance bond and may wish to include this schedule as a condition of their development permit to ensure that these activities are carried out.

Form 1 Page 13 of 20

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 133 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FORM 1 Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report

Photos

Photo 1: View of the subject property and new house being constructed out of the RAR assessment area (October 19, 2012). The concrete steps in the photograph are proposed to be removed and replaced with flagstone steps that will be bordered by a dry stack rock wall.

Photo 2: View of the existing patio and vegetation at the subject property (October 19, 2012).

Form 1 Page 14 of 20

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 134 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FORM 1 Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report

Photo 3: View of the riparian area and foreshore, the existing boat house (and ramp to the lake), boat launch, concrete retaining wall and stairs, deck area and dock are all visible (October 19, 2012).

Photo 4: View of the existing boat house, ramp to the lake and existing dock (October 19, 2012). The boat house and ramp will be grandfathered as part of the development.

Form 1 Page 15 of 20

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 135 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FORM 1 Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report

Photo 5: View of the substrates along the foreshore at the subject property which were recorded as 25% gravel and 75% sand (October 19, 2012).

Form 1 Page 16 of 20

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 136 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FORM 1 Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report

References:

BC Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations. 2012. Fisheries Inventory Data Queries. Online: http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/fidq/fissSpeciesSelect.do Accessed online: December 10, 2012.

British Columbia Ministry of Environment. 2011. Kokanee shore spawning data. (GIS Database)

British Columbia Ministry of Environment. 2009. Okanagan Region Large Lakes Foreshore Protocol. May 2009.

Schleppe, J. 2010. Okanagan Lake Foreshore Inventory and Mapping. Prepared for: Okanagan Collaborative Conservation Program. Prepared by: Ecoscape Environmental Consultants Ltd. Project File: 10-596.

Form 1 Page 17 of 20

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 137 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FORM 1 Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report

Section 7. Professional Opinion

Assessment Report Professional Opinion on the Development Proposal’s riparian area.

Date 2012-12-17

1. I/We Angela Cormano

Please list name(s) of qualified environmental professional(s) and their professional designation that are involved in assessment.)

hereby certify that: a) I am/We are qualified environmental professional(s), as defined in the Riparian Areas Regulation made under the Fish Protection Act; b) I am/We are qualified to carry out the assessment of the proposal made by the developer Perry and Jackie Shivak , which proposal is described in section 3 of this Assessment Report (the “development proposal”), c) I have/We have carried out an assessment of the development proposal and my/our assessment is set out in this Assessment Report; and d) In carrying out my/our assessment of the development proposal, I have/We have followed the assessment methods set out in the Schedule to the Riparian Areas Regulation; AND

2. As qualified environmental professional(s), I/we hereby provide my/our professional opinion that: a) if the development is implemented as proposed by the development proposal there will be no harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of natural features, functions and conditions that support fish life processes in the riparian assessment area in which the development is proposed, OR (Note: include local government flex letter, DFO Letter of Advice, or description of how DFO local variance protocol is being addressed)

b) X if the streamside protection and enhancement areas identified in this Assessment Report are protected from the development proposed by the development proposal and the measures identified in this Assessment Report as necessary to protect the integrity of those areas from the effects of the development are implemented by the developer, there will be no harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of natural features, functions and conditions that support fish life processes in the riparian assessment area in which the development is proposed.

[NOTE: "qualified environmental professional" means an applied scientist or technologist, acting alone or together with another qualified environmental professional, if (a) the individual is registered and in good standing in British Columbia with an appropriate professional organization constituted under an Act, acting under that association's code of ethics and subject to disciplinary action by that association, (b) the individual's area of expertise is recognized in the assessment methods as one that is acceptable for the purpose of providing all or part of an assessment report in respect of that development proposal, and (c) the individual is acting within that individual's area of expertise.]

Form 1 Page 18 of 20

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 138 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FORM 1 Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report

Appendix A – Site Survey

Form 1 Page 19 of 20 Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 139 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B.

CIVIC ADDRESS

SCALE 1 : 500

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 140 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. FORM 1 Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report

Appendix B – Landscape Plan (Outland Design)

Form 1 Page 20 of 20 Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 141 of 181 Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen...

0 5 10 15 20 M

206 - 1889 Spall Road Kelowna, BC V1Y 4R2 T (250) 868-9270 www.outlanddesign.ca

TURF AREA (REFER NOTES) TYP. TYPICAL ALL WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS & SUPERSEDE SCALED DIMENSIONS. P.A. PLANTING AREA (REFER PLANTING PLAN) (N) NEW THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO GIVE THE SITE INSPECTOR 48 HOURS NOTICE BEFORE ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. R.P.A. RIPARIAN PLANTING AREA (REFER PLANTING PLAN) (E) EXISTING X UNIT PAVERS MIN. MINIMUM ALL WORK OF THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK SHOWN ON THE DRAWING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ROAD X FENCE COLUMN LX VERIFY THE LIMIT OF WORK ON SITE WITH THE SITE INSPECTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CREATE LX (TYP. OF 8) UNIT PAVER BAND X MAX. MAXIMUM LX MINIMAL DISTURBANCE WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK WHERE WORK IS NOT REQUIRED. ANY DISTURBANCE TO THESE AREAS SHALL CONCRETE PAVING X TS / BS TOP / BOTTOM OF STAIRS LX BE RESTORED TO A CONDITION GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE EXISTING CONDITION. X CONTROL JOINT TW / BW TOP / BOTTOM OF WALL LX THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE SUPERIMPOSED ON A BASE SHEET. THIS BASE SHEET IS X ASPHALT PAVING 471.90 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION LX COMPILED FROM THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, OTHER ARCHITECTURAL AND/OR ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS, AND OTHER DATA BUCHANAN X AS MADE AVAILABLE TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL NOT BE HELD LIABLE FOR CHANGES, COMPACTED AGGREGATE PAVING (471.90) REFERENCED SPOT ELEVATION LX INACCURACIES, OMISSIONS, OR OTHER ERRORS ON THESE DOCUMENTS. THE COMPOSITE BASE SHEET IS PROVIDED AS AN AID COBBLE MULCH X 2% PROPOSED SLOPE / DIRECTION OF FLOW LX ONLY AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING THESE DOCUMENTS AND INCORPORATING/INTEGRATING HDR ALL CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE SAME. HEADERBOARD X LX PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING THE UTILITY COMPANIES INVOLVED AND P.A. REQUESTING A VISUAL VERIFICATION OF THE LOCATIONS OF THEIR UNDERGROUND FACILITIES. MOST UTILITY COMPANIES ARE MEMBERS OF THE UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 'CALL BEFORE YOU DIG' PROGRAM. THE CONTRACTOR OR ANY SUBCONTRACTOR FOR THIS CONTRACT SHALL NOTIFY MEMBERS 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF PERFORMING EXCAVATION WORK BY CALLING THE TOLL-FREE NUMBER (800) 474-6886. EXCAVATION IS DEFINED AS BEING 18 OR MORE INCHES IN DEPTH BELOW THE EXISTING SURFACE. THE CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT ONLY EXCAVATION WILL REVEAL THE TYPES, EXTENT, SIZES, LOCATION, AND DEPTHS OF SUCH UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. HOWEVER, THE CONSULTANT CAN ASSUME NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF ITS DELINEATION OF SUCH UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, NOR FOR THE EXISTENCE OF OTHER BURIED OBJECTS OR UTILITIES WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. (E) CONC. RETAINING WALL INSTALL EXPANSION JOINTS AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS, AS WELL AS BETWEEN CONCRETE FLATWORK AND BANDS, CURBS, AND EXISTING FLATWORK OR STRUCTURES.

ALL CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE CLEAN, STRAIGHT & PERPENDICULAR TO THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT. CONTROL JOINTS PER DETAIL. TW (355.23) X CONC. SCULPTURE REFER TO IRRIGATION PLAN FOR REQUIREMENTS OF SLEEVING UNDER PAVING. LX BASE TW 343.02 ALL PROPOSED SITE FEATURES SHALL BE STAKED IN FIELD FOR REVIEW BY THE OWNER'S INSPECTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. BW 352.12 ALL CURVES SHALL BE SMOOTH AND CONTINUOUS WITH CAREFULLY MATCHED TANGENTS. P.A. GARAGE TW 352.95 ALL PROPOSED PAVING, TURF AREAS & PLANTING AREAS SHALL SMOOTHLY CONFORM TO EXISTING ADJACENT FEATURES. 352.39m BW 352.05 PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE ON ALL PAVING AND THROUGHOUT ALL PLANTING AREAS. P.A. P.A. REFER PLANTING PLAN PROPERTY N 1% TW (354.66) WOOD FENCE REFER PLANTING PLAN X X LINK BLOCK RETAINING LX LINE (352.19) LX WALL (TYP.) EXCAVATED MATERIAL NOT SUITABLE FOR BACKFILLING SHALL BE REMOVED AND LEGALLY DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE. / LIMIT 352.00 TW (351.68) 1% P.A. OF TW 352.50 PROJECT TITLE WORK 351.00 P.A. TW 351.50 TW (350.32) P.A. SHIVAK RESIDENCE P.A. P.A. TW 351.00 350.00 P.A. P.A. P.A. TW 350.50 TW (349.06) 5261 Buchanan Road Peachland, BC ASPHALT PAVING X AGL 3 ACER GLABRUM DOUGLAS MAPLE #15 CONT. TW 350.00 (TYP.) LX TW (348.29) DRAWING TITLE UNIT PAVERS X TW 349.04 349.00 CST 5 CORNUS STOLONIFERA RED OSIER DOGWOOD #01 CONT. (TYP.) LX BW 346.78 TW (347.47) HDI 10 HOLODISCUS DISCOLOR OCEANSPRAY #01 CONT. MAQ 5 MAHONIA AQUIFOLIUM TALL OREGON GRAPE #01 CONT. UNIT PAVER 346.82m (E) CONC. RETAINING LAYOUT & GRADING X 348.00 PFR 10 POTENTILLA FRUITICOSA SHRUBBY CINQUEFOIL #01 CONT. P.A. UNIT PAVING X BAND (TYP.) LX 352.50m P.A. WALL (TO REMIAN) (TYP.) LX RLA 10 RIBES LACUSTRE BLACK GOOSEBERRY #01 CONT. PLAN 1% P.A. RNU 5 ROSA NUTKANA NOOTKA ROSE #01 CONT. RWO 5 ROSA WOODSII WOODS ROSE #01 CONT. RESIDENCE SAL 12 SYMPHORICARPOS ALBA SNOWBERRY #01 CONT. TW 348.04 HDR 347.00 ISSUED FOR / REVISION BW 346.66 P.A. TW (345.16) HOT TUB 1 12.12.14 70% Review 346.69 PROPERTY SWIMMING POOL 3% 2 COBBLE MULCH X 346.79m 346.73 (TYP.) LX 1% 346.54 R.P.A. 3

HDR ROOF OVERHANG (TYP.) 346.00 TW 346.65 LINE 4 TS 346.73 BW 345.02 BS 345.83 / 5 1% TS 346.70 LIMIT 346.73 BS 345.68 346.83 OF P.A. WORK 345.43 345.32 BOAT PROJECT NO 12-017 P.A. (345.00) DESIGN BY FB P.A. 346.73 HOUSE DRAWN BY SS 346.43 R.P.A. 346.73 345.76 TS 345.46 CHECKED BY FB TILE DECKING (BY OTHERS) 1% 38% BS (343.92) P.A. (8) RISERS DATE DEC. 14, 2012 STRUCTURAL COLUMN (TYP.) P.A. P.A. TURF SCALE 1:200 PRE-FABRICATED SAUNA HUT (343.11) P.A. AREA HDR 345.76 CONC. STAIRS X 5% (TYP.) LX SEAL GARAGE WOOD BENCH HDR GLOBE SCULPTURE P.A. 38% (343.70) LINK BLOCK RETAINING WALL X DRYSTACK STONE BOXWOOD HEDGE LX WALL X FLAGSTONE PIZZA OVEN X R.P.A. LX STEPS LX WOOD TRELLIS X (E) WOOD DECK (TO LX REMAIN) FLAGSTONE PAVING X

LX AGENDA ITEM # 9.B. 2769 OKANAGAN DRAWING NUMBER Page 142 of 181 (E) WOOD BOARDWALK (TO BE REMOVED) LAKE (E) WOOD DOCK (TO BE 900 REMOVED) L1 4 1 Globe Sculpture - Elevation Scale: 1:50 L1 ISSUED FOR REVIEW ONLY Copyright Reserved. This drawing is the property of Outland Design Landscape Architecture Limited and shall not be reproduced, resold, or tendered without permission. AGENDA ITEM # 9.B.

Development Permit DP13/10,003 for work within an environmen... Page 143 of 181 Page 144 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.C.

District of Peachland Request for Decision

To: Mayor & Council From: Planning and Development Services Department, Paul Dupuis, Planning Technician Date: April 15, 2013 Subject: Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor

Recommendation: THAT Council approve entering into a 3 year Licensing and Encroachment Agreement for the use of the location at the corner of 13th Street and Beach Avenue with the Beach Ride Rental Company in accordance with the District’s Sidewalk and Right of Way Occupancy Policy PRO-267; and,

THAT Council approve the temporary placement of a trailer at the mobile vending location (13th Street and Beach Avenue) in accordance with the attached drawings for a temporary period of 1 year; and,

THAT Council direct staff to provide a report assessing the the proposal and it’s outcomes after the 2013 mobile vending season.

Chief Administrative Officer’s Comments:

I support the recommendations:______

Implications of Recommendation:

General: The Beach Ride Rental Company will provide services to tourists via the mobile vending location at the corner of 13th Street and Beach Avenue.

Organizational: N/A

Financial: A monthly fee will be paid by the proponent to the District in accordance with the Sidewalk and Right of Way Occupancy Policy PRO-267($300 per month + applicable taxes).

Policy: Sidewalk and Right of Way Occupancy Policy PRO-267

Strategic Plan: N/A

BACKGROUND: The Beach Ride Rental Company has provided rental services within Peachland at the corner of 13th Street and Beach Avenue for 2 years. In 2011, District Council approved an application for

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 145 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.C.

the use of the site through the Seasonal Business Concessions Policy FIN-190. In the Spring of 2012 Council approved a Sidewalk and Right of Way Occupancy Policy PRO-267 which allows for both mobile and food vending services to be located within Peachland at specified locations. The Beach Ride Rental Company signed a Licensing and Encroachment Agreement for operation of the site in accordance with the Sidewalk and Right of Way Occupancy Policy PRO-267 for the 2012 tourist season.

District Staff had a pre-application meeting with the proponent of the Beach Ride Rental Company on Wednesday, February 27, 2013. The meeting was to discuss a proposal for a trailer to be put at the site on a semi-permanent (May 1st to October 31st) basis for the mobile vending season(s). In addition the proponent expressed that there is interest in procuring the longest term licensing and encroachment agreement available as found within the Sidewalk and Right of Way Occupancy Policy PRO-267 (3-years).

Staff received a formal application for the proposed works on April 4, 2013. The proponent’s application includes a letter to Council, a letter of support for the operation from a Gateway resident and design drawings for the area including representation of the location of the trailer and how the trailer will look (the painting of the trailer). The application is attached to this report.

DISCUSSSION:

The Beach Ride Rental Company has been an ideal vendor and has been very responsible in the operation of the services provided over the past 2 years. The site is orderly and well kept. Moreover, the proponents are reliable and provide services on a daily basis, weather permitting. To date there have been no formal complaints regarding the operations at the site. In fact, staff has received mostly positive feedback from both business and residents regarding the operations over the past 2 years.

The proposal calls for a 29ft long trailer (Full Size – usable space = 212 ft²) to be placed at the mobile vending site. The applicant has expressed that it would be preferable if the trailer could be left at the site on a semi-permanent basis. A number of factors have been considered relating to the application. These include:

Assessment of the proposal in relation to the Sidewalk and Right of Way Occupancy Policy PRO-267 Impact on site maintenance (Public Works) Impact on view and site lines.

Sidewalk and Right of Way Occupancy Policy PRO-267

As noted the trailer proposed is 24 ft. long and will have a total square footage of 192 ft². The policy currently states under Section D Mobile and Food Vendors,

“4. Mobile and food vending carts must not exceed 1.5m (5 ft) in width and 1.8m (6 ft) in length.”

Due to the size of the site being used and the fact that it is not located on the Beach where views may be impacted staff is of the opinion that allowing the trailer will have minimal impact compared to the use that has been occurring over the past 2 years. Therefore, to facilitate this request an amendment has been made to the policy whereby a Subsection under Section D has been created for the location at 13th and Beach Avenue that specifies that a trailer of the size proposed may be used on the site. (See attached policy – with amendment).

Another aspect of the proposal that must be considered in relation to the policy is the display of graphics on the trailer (signage). In essence the painting of the trailer does become a form of signage for the Beach Ride Rental Company. For this reason this aspect of the proposal must be

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 146 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.C.

assessed in relation to both the Sidewalk and Right of Way Occupancy Policy PRO-267 and Sign Bylaw No. 1853, 2007. Sign Bylaw No. 1853, 2007 states under Part 15 – Prohibited Signs,

“15.14 Signs attached to or located on any vehicle or trailer parked on a public right-of-way or public property or on private property so as to be visible from a public right-of-way which provide advertisement or products or directs people to a business or an activity on the same lot or on any other lot.”

Although, this may be the case within the Sidewalk and Right of Way Occupancy Policy under Section D Mobile and Food Vending it states,

“14. All signs advertising the sale of goods or services must be an integral part of the vending cart/mobile vehicle.”

Therefore, this becomes somewhat of a grey area in terms of this proposal. The depicted graphics as shown by the proposal of signage to be painted on the trailer is an integral part of the vending cart/mobile vehicle.” The intent of the sign bylaw is to stop signage from being mobile throughout the District thereby making it difficult to regulate. The District through the policy has a position that signage as part of the vending vehicles is an integral part of doing business in the leased areas as delineated. In this case, it is staff’s opinion that the proposed signage as part of the trailer is in accordance with the intent of both the policy and the bylaw and for this reason should be considered by Council for approval.

Impact on Site Maintenance (Public Works)

The applicant has expressed willingness to pay for any costs that may be incurred to make the site available for the use of the trailer as proposed. Through discussion with Public Works it has been found that the sprinklers may have to be diverted but that this could be easily done and at relatively low cost. In addition, if the trailer is to be parked semi-permanently it was suggested that to minimize the need to move the trailer for lawn maintenance either a concrete pad or concrete pavers may need to be installed. Therefore, based on these discussions with Public Works it is staff’s recommendation that the sprinklers be re-routed at the cost of the applicant and that arrangements be discussed with the applicant regarding installation of some form of base for the trailer. If approved by Council the applicant and Public Works will work closely to assess the needed improvements and the applicant will pay the costs of any proposed works as agreed upon by the applicant and the Director of Operations. It must be noted that the applicant will also be responsible for the cost of remediation of the site in the event that this may not be supported by Council in the future. For this a security deposit in addition to the $200.00 within the policy will be requested from the applicant. This security deposit for remediation will be set by the Director of Operations.

Impact on View and Site Lines

The proposal for the site shows that the trailer will be placed just in front of an existing garage on the adjacent property. This placement minimizes the impact on the view. Moreover, the trailer is placed far enough from the intersection so that traffic safety is not a concern. It is staff’s recommendation that the placement of the trailer in the location specified be approved since the impact on view and site lines has been minimized.

Other Discussion:

As previously noted the vendor has been responsible in the maintenance and operation of the specified site over the past 2 years. The applicant in conjunction with this proposal has asked that they be granted a 3-year Licencing and Encroachment Agreement the longest term allowable under the Sidewalk and Right of Way Occupancy Policy PRO-267. It is staff’s recommendation

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 147 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.C.

that the District enter into this term with the applicant. This provides certainty for both the District and the applicant in relation to their business operations. However, staff also suggests that the proposal currently put forth to Council only be granted on a 1 year temporary basis. This will allow for an assessment at the end of the season as to whether or not Council is pleased with the outcome of the proposal as recommended by staff. If it is found that Council is pleased with the outcomes, then staff will amend the agreement in 2014 to extend the proposal for the additional 2 years of the agreement term. Therefore, staff will provide a report to Council at the end of the mobile vending season October 31, 2013 (report early in 2014).

Consideration of Options:

1) That Council approve entering into a 3 year lease with a provision for the temporary 1 year placement of a trailer as proposed by the applicant. Staff will provide a report re- assessing the placement of the trailer at the end of the 2013 mobile vending season (Recommended) The particulars of staff’s recommendation have been provided herein. The Beach Ride Rental Company has been a responsible vendor and provides quality service within the District. There have been no formal complaints regarding the applicants operations over the past couple of years. It is staff’s recommendation that the proposal be granted for a temporary one year term and that the outcomes of the proposal be revisited at the end of the season for consideration of Council in 2014.

2) Council denies the proposal as put forth by the Beach Ride Rental Company (Not Recommended) Based on the proposal as assessed and the operational history of the applicant it is not recommended that Council deny the proposal. Staff has suggested a temporary one year term so that the proposal and its outcomes can be re-assessed and Council can make a decision relating this issue again in 2014.

3) Council may revise the proposal to address things of concern (Not Recommended) Council may wish to revise the proposal to address concerns that Council may have regarding the proposal. Staff has recommended a one year temporary term so that Council may re-assess this proposal at the end of the 2013 mobile vending season. With a report expected back to Council in early 2014.

REPORT/DOCUMENT: Attached: X Available: Nil:

1. Proposal package from applicant 2. Amended Sidewalk and Right of Way Occupancy Policy PRO-267

OPTIONS: 1. COUNCIL MAY CHOOSE TO SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION. 2. COUNCIL MAY CHOOSE NOT TO SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION. 3. COUNCIL MAY CHOOSE TO REFER THE MATTER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 148 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.C.

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 149 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.C.

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 150 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.C.

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 151 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.C.

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 152 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.C.

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 153 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.C.

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 154 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.C. PRO-267

The Corporation of the District of Peachland Policy

SIDEWALK AND RIGHT OF WAY OCCUPANCY POLICY

Effective Date: Authorized By: Replaces:

March 27, 2012 Council – Regular Meeting New Policy

PURPOSE:

To establish guidelines for the orderly establishment and use of public sidewalks, parking spaces, property and right of way for sidewalk cafes, merchant displays and mobile and food vendors

AUTHORITY TO ACT

Delegated to the Building Inspector and the Director of Planning and Development Services.

PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTATION

The use of public sidewalks, parking spaces, and road right of way in the Beach Avenue corridor may be permitted for restaurants, bakeries, delicatessens, merchant displays, mobile and food vending at the discretion of the District of Peachland.

A. DEFINITIONS

Sidewalk Cafés: (Outdoor Patio, Sidewalk Patio) directly adjacent spatial accessory use to a restaurant or licensed establishment located on the main floor of a building occupying portions of Public Space, typically for the purpose of serving food and beverages in an outdoor setting to seated patrons.

Merchant Displays: (Racks, Displays, Outdoor Tables, etc.) A directly adjacent spatial accessory use to a business located on the main floor of a building, occupying portions of public space for the purpose of displaying merchandise in an outdoor environment.

Mobile Vendors: (Street Stands and Recreational Rentals) An independently operated vehicle, structure, or mobile apparatus occupying public space, typically for the purpose of providing retail products or services for commercial sale by a business entity, in an outdoor setting to passers-by.

Food Vendors: (Food Trucks and Mobile Food Carts) An independently operated vehicle, structure or mobile apparatus occupying public space, typically for the purpose of providing food and beverage for commercial sale by a business entity, in an outdoor setting to passers-by.

B. SIDEWALK CAFES

A Sidewalk Café is defined as: (Outdoor Patio, Sidewalk Patio) directly adjacent spatial accessory use to a restaurant or licensed establishment located on the main floor of a building occupying portions of Public Space, typically for the purpose of serving food and beverages in an outdoor setting to seated patrons.

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 155 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.C. PRO-267

1. All sidewalk cafes located on public sidewalks, parking stalls, and road right of ways are required to sign sidewalk Cafe License and Encroachment Agreement with the municipality which will be valid for a 3 year term.

2. Sustainable green practices in the operation of the business are encouraged.

3. Sidewalk cafes are limited to the use of a portion of a sidewalk or parking stall or both to a maximum sidewalk seating area of 350 ft² (excluding sidewalk and access areas).

4. The occupancy load of a sidewalk café must not exceed regulation requirements of the Provincial Liquor Licensing, Regional Health Authority or the BC Building Code (e.g. 12.9 ft² per person).

5. All sidewalk cafes proposed by a business to be located on the public sidewalk or in the area containing public parking stalls must be located directly adjacent to the existing business. A maximum of 3 parking stalls may be used. Where the remaining depth of the stall permits the stall will be posted for use as “small car parking only”. The size of the small parking stalls will be in accordance with the minimum size requirements in the zoning bylaw. No post barricades will be placed at the head of each of the parking stalls used. The placement of the no post barricades will be done by the District of Peachland Public Works Department at the cost of the applicant.

6. Sidewalk cafes shall not extend onto the sidewalk or onto parking spaces which are within the frontage of adjacent businesses without the written consent and the agreement of those adjacent businesses. This information is to be considered by the Licensing Inspector in the evaluation of the application.

7. No table or chairs shall be placed within 1.2m (4 ft) of a bus stop, taxi stand, fire hydrant, or counter service window or within .6m (2 ft) of any building entrance and exit.

8. The sidewalk cafe must provide an unobstructed access of a minimum .6m (2 ft) on either side of the entrance of the building for the width of the cafe.

9. A sidewalk café must leave a minimum of 1.8m (6 ft) of public walkway which shall remain unobstructed, unused and clear for pedestrian traffic. Where the sidewalk café projects into an area currently occupied by parking stalls, turns in direction along the walkway must be at an angle consistent with that of the adjoining parking spaces (e.g. 45 degrees). There must be no changes in elevation between the top of the sidewalk/curb and the top of the constructed walkway, and any stairs or steps along the length of the walkway shall not be permitted. The walkway surface must provide a non-slip surface. The walkway must be constructed of pressure treated Spruce, Pine or Fir that is of No. 1 or No. 2 Grade as per Canadian Standards and the spacing of the boards must not exceed 0.6 cm (0.25”).

10. Either a fence or concrete planters must separate the public walkway from the roadway and any adjoining parking stalls (See Schedule “D” Design Drawings).

11. Fencing enclosures will be a minimum height of .92m (36”) and a maximum height of 1.02m (40”) to allow visibility to the street patrons. Enclosures will be discreet in colour, design, material and finishes to reduce visual clutter. Dark painted ornamental iron, steel, stainless steel and aluminum fencing is preferred. The width of access opening in the perimeter fence accessing the sidewalk cafe will not be less than 1.5m (5ft) and no greater than 2m (6.5 ft)

12. A sidewalk café fenced enclosure will have post spacing between 1.2m (48”) to 1.5m (60”) to provide structural stability. A top rail should allow planter boxes to be mounted

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 156 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.C. PRO-267

on the enclosure, as encouraged in the Beach Avenue Neighbourhood Plan. Planter boxes shall not protrude into the width of the walkway and any planter boxes bought or constructed shall not exceed 3.5m (12”) in width by 3.5m (12”) in depth. Pickets above the top railing are not permitted. A kick rail should be positioned .15 m (6”) from the finished grade of the sidewalk to guide the visually impaired. Retractable awnings and pergolas will be considered by the District on a case by case basis and subject to review and approval of the Licensing Inspector.

13. Posts should be anchored to generate significant strength yet allow easy removal. The preferred attachment method is to employ connectors, which retain a stable shape when anchored to base, railing and/or buildings. Pinning, or drilling screws or lag bolts into the sidewalk is not permitted. However, flush inserts that are capped annually may be considered by the licensing inspector at the application stage and may be given approval.

14. Concrete planters must be a minimum of 1.2m (4 ft) in length and 0.6m (2 ft.) in height.

15. No cooking, storage, cooling or refrigeration or other equipment is to be located in the sidewalk café area without written consent of the District.

16. A sidewalk café will not use paper or plastic plates or cups in providing food services in the café area unless such plates or cups are used for the sole purpose of takeout orders not to be consumed on the café site.

17. No signage will be permitted in sidewalk cafes to display any commercial advertisements for goods, products or companies other than the name of the business, unless otherwise permitted by the Municipality’s sign bylaw. Third party advertizing is not permitted except upon pre-printed umbrellas.

18. One menu board no larger than 0.7m2 (7.6 ft²) with a maximum height of 1.09m (3.6ft.) and a maximum width of 0.64m (2.1ft) will be allowed within the café site, and a “No food, beverages allowed beyond railing” sign must be posted

19. The sidewalk café area and the immediately surrounding area will be cleaned each day, before and after closure of the sidewalk café business, and any waste, discarded debris and refuse container that belongs to the business shall be removed.

20. A license will not be permitted where it may interfere with safe vehicle and pedestrian movement including within 6m (20 ft) of a stop sign or a location where visibility or safety is a deciding issue. Unless appropriate traffic control measurements and 3rd party approvals are in place.

21. All sidewalk cafes that utilize public parking stalls shall utilize a wooden platform that conforms to the Districts specifications outlined in Schedule “B” and enter into a 3year License. The applicant will bear all costs of construction and maintenance and must have all required permits required for working in the District of Peachland Right of Way prior to construction beginning.

22. Sidewalk cafes must provide proof of insurance to the satisfaction of the District of Peachland in the amount of $2,000,000.00 for establishments that do not have a liquor license and $3,000,000.00 for establishments that have a valid liquor license. Sidewalk cafés must indemnify, save harmless, release and forever discharge the municipality from any and all damages, injuries or claims arising from the use of the sidewalk.

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 157 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.C. PRO-267

23. The District retains the right to revoke any permission granted to use the sidewalk for such purposes at any time where it is found that the use and operation taking place is deemed unacceptable to the District.

24. The District retains the right to limit the number of sidewalk café permits issued per city block and the number of parking stalls used for a café area. A sidewalk café must not interfere with District of Peachland utilities, infrastructure or services.

25. Every sidewalk café shall be temporary in nature and designed so that the entire café structure and its appurtenances including but not limited to chairs, tables, fencing, bollards, and planters can be easily removed during periods of non use. Furthermore the District reserves the right to require the user to remove the sidewalk café if and when it is determined necessary within 48 hours, or immediately, in the event of an emergency, for regular scheduled utility or service installation maintenance or repair.

26. All sidewalk cafes are required to pay an established annual fee for the use of the public space as set by Council in Schedule “A”.

27. Sidewalk cafes must obtain the necessary licensing from the District, the Regional Health Authority and other relevant or applicable licensing or regulatory agencies.

28. Applications for sidewalk cafes must include the following information: a) Letter of intent that includes the hours of operation b) A photograph of the existing building c) Plot plan to scale, which includes the number of tables and chairs, location of flower planter’s umbrellas, etc. d) Plan submitted must include public walkways, parking stalls, existing municipal features such as trees, fire hydrants, benches, garbage receptacles, bike racks. e) Plans submitted must extend 5m (16 ft) on either side of proposed area; clearly indicate location of front and side property and entrances. Colour photos or drawings of all accessories to be located within the permit area. f) Materials and colour proposed to be used for fence enclosures, decking, and additional structural details.

C. MERCHANT DISPLAYS

A Merchant Displays is defined as: (Racks, Displays, Outdoor Tables, etc.) A directly adjacent spatial accessory use to a business located on the main floor of a building, occupying portions of public space for the purpose of displaying merchandise in an outdoor environment.

1. Merchant Displays located on public sidewalk must be located directly adjacent to the existing business that has applied for such use.

2. No signage will be permitted to display any commercial advertisements for goods, products or companies other than the name of the business, unless otherwise permitted by the Municipality’s sign bylaw. Third party advertizing is not permitted.

3. A license will not be permitted where it may interfere with safe vehicle and pedestrian movement including within 6m (20 ft) of a stop sign or a location where visibility or safety is a deciding issue. Unless appropriate traffic control measurements and 3rd party approvals are in place.

4. Merchants Displays must ensure that a minimum of 2m (6 ft) of sidewalk remains unused and clear for pedestrian traffic.

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 158 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.C. PRO-267

5. All merchant displays are required to pay an established annual fee for the use of the public sidewalk space as set by Council in Schedule “A”.

6. Applications for merchant displays must include the following information: a. Letter of intent that includes the hours of operation b. A photograph of the existing building c. Plot plan to scale, which includes the number of displays, tables etc. d. Plan submitted must include public walkways, parking stalls, existing municipal features such as trees, fire hydrants, benches, garbage receptacles, bike racks. e. Plans submitted must extend 5m (16 ft) on either side of proposed area; clearly indicate location of front and side property and entrances. Colour photos or drawings of all accessories to be located within the permit area.

7. Merchants must obtain the necessary licensing from the District, the Regional Health Authority and other relevant or applicable licensing or regulatory agencies prior to conducting any business in the subject area.

8. Merchants must provide proof of $2,000,000.00 insurance to the satisfaction of the District of Peachland that indemnifies, saves harmless, releases, and forever discharges the municipality from any and all damages, injuries or claims arising from the use of the sidewalk.

9. The District retains the right to revoke any permission granted to use the sidewalk for such purposes at any time where it is found that the use and operation is deemed unacceptable to the District.

10. All Merchant Displays are required to sign a Merchant Display Encroachment Agreement which will be valid for a three year term with the municipality.

11. All equipment must be removed from the site by 11:00 p.m. daily.

D. MOBILE AND FOOD VENDORS

A Mobile Vendor is defined as: (Street Stands and Recreational Rentals) An independently operated vehicle, structure, or mobile apparatus occupying public space, typically for the purpose of providing retail products or services for commercial sale by a business entity, in an outdoor setting to passers-by.

A Food Vendor is defined as: (Food Trucks and Mobile Food Carts) An independently operated vehicle, structure or mobile apparatus occupying public space, typically for the purpose of providing food and beverage for commercial sale by a business entity, in an outdoor setting to passers-by.

1. A maximum of 4 mobile vending licenses and 1 food vending license to be located north of 14th Street will be available within the District annually.

2. Location of sites open for mobile and food vending licenses are shown on attached Schedule ‘C’. Attached to and forming part of this policy.

3. The District will receive applications for mobile and food vending licenses from January 1st to February 28th Annually. Licenses will be granted to the winning applicant(s) by April 30th annually.

4. Mobile and food vending carts must not exceed 1.5m (5 ft) in width and 1.8m (6ft) in length

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 159 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.C. PRO-267

5. Any sun/rain shelters must be supported by the cart and shall have a minimum canopy height of 2.0m (6.5 ft) and a maximum length, width or diameter of 2.5m (8 ft).

6 All operators must ensure that a minimum of 2m (6 ft) of sidewalk remains unused and clear for pedestrian traffic.

7. Mobile and food vendors must obtain the necessary licensing from the District, the Regional Health Authority and other relevant or applicable licensing or regulatory agencies prior to conducting any business in the subject area.

8. Mobile and food vendors must provide proof of $2,000,000.00 insurance to the satisfaction of the District of Peachland that indemnifies, saves harmless, releases, and forever discharges the municipality from any and all damages, injuries or claims arising from the use of the sidewalk.

9. The District retains the right to revoke any permission granted to use the sidewalk for such purposes at any time where it is found that the use and operation is deemed unacceptable to the District.

10. All mobile and food vendors are required to pay an established annual fee for use of the public sidewalk, parking spaces public road ends or road right of ways as set by Council in Schedule ‘A’. Attached to and forming part of this policy.

11. All mobile and food vendors are required to sign a Mobile and Food Vending License and Encroachment Agreement which will be valid for a 1 year. The municipality retains the right to continue to renew the license for a further 1 year term or the District may enter into a maximum term of 3 years with a vendor.

12. Applications for vending carts must also include: a. Letter of intent that includes the hours of operation b. A photograph or drawing of the cart or table

13. No third party signage will be permitted, except upon pre-printed umbrellas.

14. All signs advertising the sale of goods or services must be an integral part of the vending cart/mobile vehicle.

15. The owner/operator of the business shall keep the space and surrounding area clean and clear of all waste, discarded debris and food stains.

16. Any food vending operation located within a residential neighbourhood will be required to consult as part of the application process those residents adjacent to the operation that may be affected by its operations.

Mobile Vending Location 13th Street and Beach Avenue

1. In 2013 a mobile trailer may be permitted provided the size of that trailer does not exceed a width of 2.6m (8.5 ft) and a length of 8.9m (29 ft.)

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 160 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.C. PRO-267

SCHEDULE ‘A’

Fees for the use of public sidewalk and right of way areas:

1. Application fee: $50.00

2. Sidewalk Cafes (May 1st to October 31st):

(a) Use of Sidewalk (Liquor License)

Seasonal Sidewalk Cafes – fee schedule (Liquor Licensed)

Size of Cafe Annual Fee

Up to 116 ft² $300.00

117 ft² to 233 ft² $500.00

234 ft ² to 350 ft² $700.00

+ all applicable taxes

(b) Use of Sidewalk (No Liquor License)

Seasonal Sidewalk Cafes – fee schedule (No Liquor License)

Size of Cafe Annual Fee

Up to 116 ft² $225.00

117 ft² to 233 ft² $375.00

234 ft ² to 350 ft² $525.00

+ all applicable taxes

(c) Security Deposit – Municipal Property $200.00

The square footage will be calculated to include only the area used for the seasonal sidewalk café area operation (See drawing below). The calculation is not to include area used for pedestrian access or egress from the establishment or any space used for the public walkway.

From November 1st to April 30th Those that have a signed licensing and encroachment agreement with the District and wish to have a temporary patio for a special event will pay a $50.00 application. Upon approval from the licensing inspector no other fees or charges will be required.

3. Merchant Displays (Year Round):

a) Application Fee Only $50.00

4. Mobile Vendors and Food Vendors (May 1st to October 31st):

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 161 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.C. PRO-267

a) Monthly Fee $300.00 per month, + applicable taxes

b) Security Deposit – Municipal Property $200.00

5. Post dated cheques are required at the beginning of each season.

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 162 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.C. PRO-267

Public Parking

Fence

Pedestrian Pathway 6’ D Fence Fence

Fence Municipal Sidewalk E B C A B 4’ Entrance Entrance

Tenant Space

Sidewalk Café Area: Means the area calculated by multiplying the length and the width of the areas used for sidewalk café. Seating for Sidewalk Café Area: The total sidewalk café area divided by 12.9 ft² per person as per the BC Building Code will determine the occupancy to be approved within a sidewalk café.

The following is an example of how total square footage for the seasonal sidewalk café and occupancy would be calculated for this illustration: A - 8’ X 8’ = 64ft². B – 8’ X 10’ = 80ft² C – 8’ X 10‘ = 80ft² Total ft² = 224 ft² divided by 12.9 ft² = 17.4 people (occupancy)

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 163 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.C. PRO-267

SCHEDULE “B”

(Wooden Platform Specifications)

1. The minimum width of the travelled portion of the wooden platform is to be a minimum of 1.8m (6 ft.). 2. There must be no change in elevation from the top of the sidewalk/curb and the constructed public walkway (wooden platform). 3. The walkway surface must provide a non-slip surface and be constructed from pressure treated Spruce, Pine or Fir that is of No. 1 or No. 2 Grade as per Canadian Standards. 4. The spacing of any boards used to construct the walkway must not exceed 0.6 cm (.25”).

.

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 164 of 181 Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor

Schedule “C” (Location for proposed Vending Licenses)

AGENDA ITEM # 9.C.

Page 165 of 181 Mobile Vending License Locations

Food Vending License Location (North of 14th Street)

AGENDA ITEM # 9.C. Schedule “D” (Design Drawings of Railings and Concrete Planters)

For reference and information only

Beach Ride Rental Company – Mobile Vendor Page 166 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.D.

District of Peachland Request for Decision

To: Mayor & Council From: Dave Smith, Director of Planning and Development Services Date: April 12, 2013 Subject: Renewable Energy Opportunities Study Recommendation: THAT the Renewable Energy Opportunities Study dated April 15, 2013 be adopted by the District of Peachland; and, THAT the report also be forwarded to the Mayor’s Task Force on Climate Change for their information and recommendations.

Chief Administrative Officer’s Comments:

I support the recommendations:______

Implications of Recommendation:

General: The final Morrison Hershfield report highlights those renewable technologies that the District may wish to pursue in furthering energy reduction and GHG reduction in the District. Hydropower is not considered feasible in this report.

Organizational: N/A

Financial: The Morrison Hershfield Study was paid for by Gas Tax Funding and was not a cost to the municipal tax base. If the District decides to pursue alternate / clean energy options, there may be short term municipal costs required, but substantial energy cost savings will accrue over the long term, in addition to anticipated reductions in GHG emissions and energy consumption. Policy: This study will supplement a number of District Bylaws including the OCP, CEEP and Water Master Plan and Municipal policies. Strategic Plan: N/A

BACKGROUND: History April 2012 the District was successful in receiving $36,000.00 Gas Tax grant funding for the Alternative Energy Opportunities Study. The study was funded 100% by grant funding.

May/June 2012 the Terms of Reference (TOR) for the study were on the agenda of the MTFCC, and were reported on and discussed at 2 MTFCC meetings. A

Morrison Hershfield Renewable Energy Opportunities Study Page 167 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.D.

Request for Proposals (RFP) followed. The Study was to look at the “high level feasibility” of renewable energy technologies and if they are feasible within Peachland context.).

July 2012 Morrison Hershfield Ltd. was chosen as the most appropriate proposal from 16 submissions based on the TOR criteria as set out in the RFP and as assessed by staff.

September 4, 2012 Urban Systems Ltd. presented the Peachland Lake Direct Transmission Main Conceptual Study to Committee of the Whole. Main emphasis of the study related to water supply issues and deferral of a filtration plant in water treatment, although there was reference to the transmission line having the potential for hydropower potential. This report was considered by Morrison Hershfield as part of their research.

October 29, 2012 Morrison Hershfield presented their preliminary findings to the Mayor’s Task Force on Climate Change on October 31, 2012. The preliminary analysis suggested the micro-hydro generation would not be cost effective. This professional opinion varies from the opinion expressed in the Urban Systems Ltd.

March 12, 2013 Council passed a resolution stating;

“THAT Morrison Hershfield be requested to proceed with the completion of the Renewable Energy Opportunities Study (Option 1).

THAT upon completion of the Renewable Energy Opportunities Study, that Council considers whether or not to proceed with a more detailed feasibility study respecting a Hydropower project on Peachland Creek.”

April 12, 2013 After a discussion with Urban Systems Ltd., the following process was forwarded respecting reviewing the potential for a micro-hydro energy proposal in Peachland:

Urban Systems review of raw water pipeline per micro- $1,200 hydro energy potential

Joint round table meeting between District, Urban $3,200 Systems Ltd. ($1,600) and Morrison Hershfield Ltd. (($1,600) Council workshop session $5,000 TOTAL COST $9,400

DISCUSSION:

The Alternate Energy Opportunity Study included a thorough and professional analysis of all alternative energy alternatives. This will be of considerable assistance to Council and the Mayor’s Task Force on Climate Change in moving forward. Areas of the study included: - Geo-exchange - Solar Hot Water - Solar PV - Biomass

Morrison Hershfield Renewable Energy Opportunities Study Page 168 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.D.

- Wind Power - Hydro Power - District Energy considerations - Heat demand - Business models and funding considerations Geo-exchange and Biomass were identified as having the most apparent feasibility at this time. Any options to be pursued will need to have further research and analysis undertaken and a more detailed business case formulated. It is recommended the study be received by Council. With respect to the research, analysis and recommendation on the feasibility of a micro-hydro energy project, staff had a discussion with Urban Systems Ltd. on the subject and a proposal was put forward which would cost $9,400. It is suggested this be referred back to the Mayor’s Task Force on Climate Change for further analysis and recommendations to Council.

REPORT/DOCUMENT: Attached: X Available: Nil:

1. Renewable Energy Opportunities Study – Executive Summary: Morrison Hershfield, April 15, 2013.

2. Letter from Urban Systems Ltd. respecting Peachland Lake Raw Water Transmission Line Micro Hydro Potential – Clarification dated April 12, 2013. OPTIONS: 1. COUNCIL MAY CHOOSE TO SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION. 2. COUNCIL MAY CHOOSE NOT TO SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION. 3. COUNCIL MAY CHOOSE TO REFER THE MATTER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.

Morrison Hershfield Renewable Energy Opportunities Study Page 169 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.D.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The District of Peachland retained Morrison Hershfield in collaboration with JDQ Engineering and the Community Energy Association to carry out screening level analyses of potential renewable energy sources that could contribute to the District’s greenhouse gas reduction commitments. Adoption or renewable energy sources in both existing and new developments may provide many other community benefits including: local economic development, potential new revenue streams for the municipality, local capacity building in the renewable energy field, energy security, insulation from fluctuating fuel prices, and community recognition.

The scope of the study included three heat production sources: geoexchange, solar thermal, and biomass; and, three electrical production sources: wind, run of river hydro, and solar photovoltaic.

For thermal energy technologies, five heat/cooling demand scenarios were developed to characterise the resource requirements and economics at various scales and applications. The scenarios include future developments planned within the District and provide reference points for the financial comparison among renewable technology options for similar developments. Three of the scenarios were for single buildings, while two were for district heating applications.

Thermal Energy Scenarios Scenarios Single-Family Multi-Family Commercial Mixed-Use 6th Street District Heating Cluster District Heating Description Detached House 5-Storey, 40 3-Storey Office 3 Multi-Family Community Unit Building & 2 Commercial Centre, 50+ Condominium Centre, Old Primary School, New Seniors Housing Total Floor Space (m2) 210 3,500 2,000 14,500 13,700 Total Annual Heating 69 1,150 428 4,310 4,800 Load (GJ) Total Annual Cooling 19 284 230 1,310 1,220 Load (GJ)

The technology assessments of each energy source follow a sequential framework that builds the basis for the rating summary presented at the end of each technology assessment section. Technical and economic feasibility of the technologies is assessed both under current conditions and through sensitivity analyses, potential future conditions related to energy purchase price, fuel source price, and capital grant incentives or price reductions as technologies mature.

i

Morrison Hershfield Renewable Energy Opportunities Study Page 170 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.D.

Technology Assessment Framework

The technology assessments show that the greatest renewable energy opportunities within the District from a resource perspective are geoexchange, solar thermal, biomass and solar PV. Nearby wind study areas by independent power producers could provide the District with an opportunity to support such projects and obtain economic benefits such as employment, and secondary benefits to the retail and service industries. However, wind and hydro power generation within the District were found to be limited from a resource perspective and therefore, did not proceed further in the financial analysis.

Based on the current economic assumptions, geo-exchange and biomass (particularly the proposed new Seniors Complex Building) offer the best economic viability; however, both solar thermal and solar PV could provide positive business cases if their capital costs continue to decline or if new incentive programs become available. Potential greenhouse gas emission savings were also quantified for all technologies and scenarios. The total greenhouse emissions displaced depends on how widely these technologies are adopted. Generally, renewable energy heating projects yield greater greenhouse gas savings since the emission factor of natural gas is eight times greater per unit of energy displaced than the same unit of primarily hydro powered BC Hydro grid electricity.

The business case for heating technologies (geoexchange, solar thermal, and biomass) is compared with natural gas heating systems. With natural gas prices at almost historically low levels, the overall competitiveness of alternatives to natural gas is reduced. Expansion of markets for North American natural gas could increase the future price of gas thus improving the business case for the alternatives assessed. For both geoexchange and biomass, the economic viability of the projects increases with scale.

The business case for electrical generation projects is hindered by the relatively low prices offered by BC Hydro through energy purchase agreements and net metering. Given the high costs of any new generation technology, prices offered for power could become attractive in the near future which could make solar PV more viable.

Capital costs of solar PV panels have reduced so significantly that installation costs now have a dominating impact on the business case. These costs however, could provide value added benefits through local employment and could also be potentially reduced through collaboration with local colleges or organizations such as contractors within the community.

ii

Morrison Hershfield Renewable Energy Opportunities Study Page 171 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.D.

Summary of Technology Assessment Ratings Geo- Solar Biomass Wind Hydro Solar PV exchange Thermal Energy Generation Opportunity Medium Medium High Low Low Medium Current Financial Viability Medium Low Medium Low Low Low Environmental Responsibility High High High High Medium High Local Benefits Medium Medium High Medium Medium High Risk Aversion Medium High Medium High Low High

Overall Rating Medium Medium Medium Low Low Medium

The report also includes an assessment of project implementation paths and case studies from 14 municipal renewable energy projects. They provide the following key lessons learned: . Conserve energy first; innovate second. . Project and utility developers emphasized the importance of leadership, communication and accountability. Partnerships and good relationships between partners are critical. Project leads should stand firm on essential program elements; be flexible otherwise. . Local capacity and experience, including suppliers, are an advantage for any project. Local equipment suppliers can sometimes offer reduced prices. Local fuel sources lead to economic benefit; however ensuring that fuel sources are reliable is absolutely essential. . Do your homework, but do not overdo it. While feasibility studies are essential, they cannot predict everything. Several case study participants noted that both good and bad luck on timing had significant impacts on projects, particularly in relation to market downturns and upturns. . When dealing with multiple funding partners, hitting milestones during project development can be challenging. Subsidies and incentives have been essential to almost all projects profiled, however identifying relevant programs is difficult and programs tend to come and go. . Develop an informed, confident community, especially youth members. . Project scale affects both affordability of the system and extent of benefits. Scalability – the ability to expand a system in the future – should be taken into consideration. Often one successful project leads to another. Projected profits help increase comfort about risks. . Both developing and operating a system involves steep learning curves for staff. Local sources of expertise are a significant benefit. Setting customer rates is complex.

iii

Morrison Hershfield Renewable Energy Opportunities Study Page 172 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.D.

Based on the results of the assessment the following next steps for the District of Peachland were identified: . Champion public education in energy conservation and encourage and invest in energy efficiency both in building design and in urban planning to reduce both building and transportation energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. . Identify specific opportunities to pursue the most promising technologies identified in this report (biomass and geoexchange) and identify champions and partnerships to pursue the next stage – the feasibility study. The business case analysis suggests that the proposed Seniors Complex could offer the most financially viable renewable energy opportunity and is worth pursuing to a more detailed feasibility study. . Review the sequence of steps presented in Section 5.1 for developing a renewable energy project . Conduct a thorough analysis of the engineering, legal and economic viability of any projects the District chooses to pursue by itself or in partnership with other organisations. . Engage with other municipalities interested in renewable energy generation and collaborate in developing specific technology projects in each community to reduce costs and risk, and to encourage BC Hydro to provide energy purchase programs that are more suitable to encourage small scale municipal renewable energy projects < 50kW. . Confirm assumptions associated with the hydro generation opportunity. . Review bylaws and planning regulations such that they can facilitate the development of renewable energy technologies, particularly solar and district energy. . Explore utility company partnerships for proceeding with any district energy options, as they may pay feasibility study and all other costs (review governance and financing information in this report prior to making a decision). . Provide non-monetary incentives to encourage development of renewable energy systems within the district, e.g. through planning and policy measures. . Identify partnerships with Okanagan College to develop renewable energy projects such as solar thermal or solar power within the District. . Monitor funding opportunities and Energy Purchase Programs from FCM, SolarBC, FortisBC, and BC Hydro that would enhance the financial viability of a project. . Review the financial analyses in this report for specific technologies as economic conditions change to determine if economic viability improves. . Distribute report within the community to enhance overall understanding of the opportunities within Peachland and encourage their development.

iv

Morrison Hershfield Renewable Energy Opportunities Study Page 173 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.D.

Morrison Hershfield Renewable Energy Opportunities Study Page 174 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # 9.D.

Morrison Hershfield Renewable Energy Opportunities Study Page 175 of 181 Page 176 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # A.

1450 KLO Road, Kelowna, BC V1W 3Z4 P 250.469.6270 F 250.762.7011 www.obwb.ca

04 April 2013

5806 Beach Ave Peachland, B.C. V0H 1X7

Re: Okanagan Basin Water Board, Water Conservation and Quality Improvement Grant

Dear Mirjam Glass

Congratulations! The Okanagan Basin Water Board has approved your application for a grant in the amount of $24,000 under our Water Conservation and Quality Improvement grant program. We are very pleased to support your Improved Water Management Using WEAP project and to join with the District of Peachland in promoting sustainable management of our ecosystems.

Please refer to the enclosed Contribution Agreement for the full terms of this grant. The OBWB is pleased to offer a number of grant payment options—please review these, select the option best suited to your organization’s needs, sign and return the Contribution Agreement to the address above by April 30, 2013.

Please note that each grant recipient is required to put out a news release to the media regarding their project. The OBWB’s Communications Director, Corinne Jackson, is available to consult if needed. Please ensure that a copy of the news release is forwarded to Ms. Jackson.

Please keep in touch throughout the course of your project. We may also contact you around the mid-point of your project to arrange a site visit.

Once again, we look forward to assisting the District of Peachland in advancing water conservation and quality improvements in the Okanagan Valley.

Sincerely,

K. James Littley Anna Warwick Sears Office & Projects Manager Executive Director

Phone: 250-469-6270 Phone: 250-469-6251 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected]

1

Okanagan Basin Water Board Page 177 of 181 Page 178 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # B.

Photo by Shaun Talbot BOARD REPORT: April 4, 2013

Okanagan Basin Water Board Meeting Highlights OBWB Directors

Stu Wells - Chair, Okanagan Water Stewardship Council wins national award: Board of Directors Regional District of Okanagan- recognized the work of its technical advisory body the Okanagan Water Stewardship Similkameen Council (WSC) and its recent win of the “Award of Excellence in Water Stewardship” by the Council of the Federation. The award was established by the council – a Rick Fairbairn - Vice Chair, collaboration of Canada’s provincial and territorial premiers – to recognize outstanding Regional District of North achievement, innovative practice and leadership in water stewardship. The WSC was chosen from 16 B.C. nominations. In presenting the award, the council noted the WSC is Okanagan “bringing about demonstrable change through leading-edge research, decision-making

Bernie Bauer, Okanagan tools and plan development. All of this is done in a highly collaborative environment with a broad spectrum of interests.” Water Stewardship Council Projects awarded grants to protect and conserve water: The board approved Michael Brydon, Regional $300,000 in funding from its Water Conservation and Quality Improvement Grant District of Okanagan- Program to 29 projects in the valley. Five projects will receive funding in the North Similkameen Okanagan worth a total of $57,300. Another 9 in the Central Okanagan will receive $177,300, and $65,400 has been awarded to five projects in the South Okanagan. Juliette Cunningham, Projects include support for an invasive mussel prevention program, the Kalamalka Regional District of North demonstration garden showcasing smart rainwater capture and water conservation Okanagan practices, creek restoration work by Ecole KLO Middle School, and a waterwise landscaping project by Summerland Ornamental Gardens. Doug Dirk, Regional District of North Okanagan Stop zebra mussel campaign picking up steam: Directors were provided an update on efforts to keep the Okanagan zebra and quagga mussel free. Efforts include a public Keith Fielding, Regional meeting in Osoyoos April 4, 7-9 p.m. at the Sonora Community Centre (details: District of Central Okanagan www.okwaterwise.ca). Meetings are also being held with Okanagan and Similkameen Invasive Species Society and Invasive Species Council of BC to ensure strong Doug Findlater, Regional collaboration and prevent duplication of efforts. A committee, led by the OBWB’s District of Central Okanagan Okanagan WaterWise program, has been created to help launch an Okanagan-specific campaign and includes representatives from the local tourism and business community. James Pepper, Okanagan Presentations are being given to local governments in the valley and other interested groups. Those interested in such a presentation can contact staff at 250-469-6271. Nation Alliance Annual state of Okanagan water supply webinar planned: The OBWB’s annual water Toby Pike, Water Supply supply webinar is set for April 23, 10-11 a.m. This free online seminar will review current Association of B.C. Okanagan water supplies and provide weather forecasting. Farmers, water utility managers and others will be provided up-to-date information to help plan and prepare for Tom Siddon, Regional District the upcoming growing and irrigation season. Past speakers have included of Okanagan-Similkameen representatives from Environment Canada, B.C.’s Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations, and the OBWB. Details available Gerry Zimmermann, Regional soon at www.obwb.ca. District of Central Okanagan OBWB’s Water Supply and Demand Project receives national recognition: The The next regular meeting of Water Board was recently recognized for “Leadership in Collaboration” for its Water Supply and Demand Project in this year’s edition of Waters Next – an annual publication the OBWB is 10 a.m., of Water Canada which highlights Canadian water achievements. Each year, 12 industry May 7, 2013 at Regional leaders are chosen by a selection committee of Canadian water experts. More District of Central Okanagan, information can be found at: http://watercanada.net/waters-next/. KelownaOkanagan. Basin Water Board Report Page 179 of 181 For more information, please visit: www.OBWB.ca Page 180 of 181 AGENDA ITEM # C.

Ref: 97492

Dear Mayor and Councillors:

As Co-Chairs of the B.C. Small Business Roundtable (Roundtable), we are pleased to invite your government to compete for the 2013 Open for Business Award.

Small business plays a vital role in developing both the economic and social fabric of our province, and their owners are the heart and soul of our communities. These awards recognize communities that are undertaking initiatives and partnerships to reduce the cost and complexity of doing business in British Columbia. As an incentive, the Province is providing awards of $10,000 each to communities best demonstrating planned initiatives that are within the spirit of the B.C. Small Business Accord. A maximum of 20 awards are available.

An award application is included with this email, and is also available on the Small Business Roundtable website at www.smallbusinessroundtable.ca. Please note that the deadline for submitting an application is June 21, 2013. Finalists will be selected in August, and the winners announced in September during the week of the Union of British Columbia Municipalities Annual Convention in Vancouver.

Your community’s participation will help the Roundtable capture and share best practices that reduce regulatory overlap, and leverage partnerships to improve government interactions with small business.

The Roundtable Secretariat is available to support the preparation of your application and can be contacted by telephone at (250) 387-9083 or by email to [email protected].

We look forward to receiving your submission.

Sincerely,

Naomi Yamamoto Kevin Krueger, MLA Minister of State for Small Business Kamloops-South Thompson

Minister of State for Small Office of the Minister Mailing Address: Location: Business PO Box 9054 Stn Prov Govt Room 133 Victoria BC V8W 9E2 Parliament Buildings Phone: 250 356-0946 Victoria BC V8V 1X4 Fax: 250 356-0948

BC Small Business Round Table Page 181 of 181