Wold-Newtonry: Theory and Methodology for the Literary Archeology of the Wold Newton Universe. By Dr. Peter M. Coogan (
[email protected])1 Introduction This article represents an attempt to lay out a taxonomy of the activities related to Wold-Newtonry, the practice of literary archeology that continues Philip José Farmer’s work on the Wold Newton Universe. It is intended to be descriptive, not proscriptive, that is I want to show what we do, not to tell people what to do. The value I intend for this article to have is that it foregrounds our assumptions and provides terminology to discuss our activities. This is, in essence, the first formal statement of the theory and methodology of the field of Wold-Newtonry. I want it to help to codify the field and to move the field forward toward more of a simulacrum of real scholarship. Many authors contributed to this article; in places, I act merely as an editor, so it can be regarded as a corporate statement of the field by the field’s leading practitioners. My coinage of the term literary archeology was inspired by Warren Ellis’ use of “mystery archeologists” in Planetary. As Ellis’ Planetarians investigate and map the “secret history of the twentieth century” (“Nuclear Spring” np), we map and investigate the unknown history of the universe as revealed in novels, pulps, films, comics, legend, myth, epic, and other literary and cultural texts. We treat these literary texts as archeologists treat the artifacts they dig up, as clues to a larger understanding of the world that has to be guessed at and constructed from incomplete pieces.