Camping Program Update

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Camping Program Update Camping Program Update Prepared by: 2M Associates In collaboration with: Land Economics Consultants, LLC. Questa Engineering Corporation July 3, 2014 (DRAFT) Camping Goals Subject to availability of funding and specific Board action on individual elements, the proposed camping program should make available for interested East Bay residents a wide range of different and exciting camping experiences. It is intended that the camping experiences be diverse in nature, and that the camping sites be selected in a manner that assures a reasonable accessibility for East Bay residents, wherever they may live in the two-county area. Although a minimum number of improvements necessarily will be provided in order to accommodate the public, at all times the District's planning efforts will aim to retain a maximum of natural environmental setting. It is intended, also, that the camping facilities and experience will: • be of a regional nature. • occur in those selected District facilities in which the activity will not compromise or endanger the quality of the environment; all proposed individual camping programs (facilities and operations) will be subject to CEQA review and the park planning process. • be established with an awareness and participation of the neighboring communities which are in close proximity to the facility in which the camping activity is proposed. • be designed to insure appropriate access by persons with disabilities. Resolution No. 1996-4-80 The District will continue to plan and develop a balanced system of regional camping facilities, including day camps, group camps, backpack camps, family camps and residential camps. Master Plan 2013 Policy RFA9 C AMPING P ROGRAM U PDATE O VERVIEW This Camping Program Update continues the tradition of the East Bay Regional Park District providing a wide variety of overnight and recreational day camp opportunities through the District. This Camping Program Update is based on the camping program initiated by a Citizens Camping Task Force and adopted by the District Board in 1996. This Camping Program Update incorporates the perspectives and participation of a wide range of individuals and organizations that included: a comprehensive review of regional recreation providers, their facilities, and their perspectives of camping trends; focused discussions with representatives of groups that use the District’s camps; an internet survey; and discussions and review with District staff. The District currently includes three family camps, thirty-six group camps, twenty-two backpack camps, eight equestrian camps, and one residential camp. Day camp programs occur at any of the one hundred and sixty-nine group picnic sites spread throughout the District. These day camp programs include those offered by the District as well as other public agencies, non-profit organizations, and private enterprises. The demand for all types of camping is stable and is anticipated to increase with a growing population. New Camps Fifty-two opportunities for developing new camps in District lands were evaluated as part of this Camping Program Update. Of these, thirty-four camp sites were prioritized with thirteen new camps being identified for development in the next seven years. Other Camping Program Opportunities In the process of evaluating opportunities for new camps, and based on projected demand and trends in camping, a number of considerations about existing camps, operations, and reservations were identified that, if addressed, would also benefit the Camping Program. These include: • Updating Facilities - Many of the existing District camps are aging and do not meet today’s campers’ expectations. Some camps are simply in need of addressing deferred maintenance, and in some cases complete overhaul. July 3, 2014 (Draft) Overview - 1 Camping Program Update East Bay Regional Park District Outdated facilities, particularly restrooms in camps of all types, discourage use. Water and sewer infrastructure systems, including road design characteristics, limit use and expansion. The family camp at Anthony Chabot Regional Park is prime example of a facility needing an update. • Upgrading Reservation Systems and Family Camp Designs for Flexibility: Family camps could be re-organized with slight modifications to accommodate the trend of “family group camping” where small groups of campers desire to have their own tent or trailer site, but be hear each other and have available a common gathering place for meals and socializing. • Retrofitting and Managing Existing Camps for Multiple Use: There are existing backpack camps that could be modified with equestrian features without the need for an entirely separate camp with restroom and water supply. There are existing backpack camps that could be modified with equestrian features There are group overnight camps, most popular on weekends, that could be used for day camps during the week. There are some large group camps, that with some minimal redesign, could be used by multiple smaller groups. • Encouraging Partnerships: The District should consider permitting cities or established non-profit organizations that have an interest in operating a small group camp or a portion of a large group camp site designed as a multi-use camp that, with philanthropic funding obtained by the organization, would provide transportation and managed overnight camping to at-risk youth from cities within the District. • Recognizing Climate: While the District is blessed with a diversity of landscapes, from a camping perspective it also is cursed with a variety of extreme microclimates. Many of the areas of the District, without shade or a water feature for comfort, are inhospitable to camping in the summer months, While this is somewhat problematic, adding shade structures to some existing camps would help. Including shade structures in new camps should be a given. Expanding Opportunities This Camping Program Update should be viewed as a living document. While some relatively new focused acquisitions in existing parks are evaluated, such as the McCosker site in Robert Sibley Volcanic Regional Preserve or the Brickyard site in the July 3, 2014 (DRAFT) Overview - 2 Camping Program Update East Bay Regional Park District Carquinez Strait Regional Shoreline, the District’s land acquisition program is dynamic. Opportunities to expand the camp system will arise and should be considered in the District’s ongoing land use planning. Examples include: • Updating the Land Use Plan for acquisitions in the north Pleasanton Ridge Regional Park area to take advantage of opportunities for a self-contained multi-day backpack trip along the Calaveras Ridge Trail. • East of Mount Diablo there is a dynamic program of land acquisitions that will benefit regional trail connectivity, outdoor recreation, and habitat conservation. These acquisitions, such as the Roddy Ranch and Smith properties, are linking developed District properties with existing camps as well as Mount Diablo State Park, that has family and group camps, and Marsh Creek State Park with planned hike-in and group camps. In the valleys and oak woodlands of these acquisitions, there are opportunities for environmentally themed backpack, group, and possibly family camps. Recommendations The table below presents a summary of priority (1 to 7 years) recommendations of the Camping Program Update. All new or upgraded camps are assumed to accommodate the U.S. Access Board’s accessibility guidelines of developed outdoor recreation areas. An asterisk (*) indicates recommended initial actions. Recommendations are presented in alphabetical order by District property. PRIORITY CAMP RECOMMENDATIONS General Consideration Reservations Facilitating reservations for self-organizing “mini-groups” of 20 to 25 people to book multiple contiguous sites for the same time periods. Reservations and Improving reservation and rule enforcement systems at Operations existing group picnic areas and considering weekday use for selected group camp areas for day camp reservations. Planning for New Camps (with environmental documentation) Ardenwood Historic Farm Resource and program evaluation to include a residential camp option and facilitate partner interest should such be expressed in the future. Briones Regional Park Minor LUP amendment to convert the Homestead Valley group camp into a backpack camp with equestrian facilities. Carquinez Strait Regional LUP amendment to: Shoreline* - include the Brickyard Site as a family camp with an July 3, 2014 (DRAFT) Overview - 3 Camping Program Update East Bay Regional Park District PRIORITY CAMP RECOMMENDATIONS ecology theme (tent camping, convenience camping1, possibly small RV camping and potential water trail camp). - allow for reserved overnight convenience camping(see note #) for access from the San Francisco Bay Water Trail. Delta Access Regional Initiate the land use planning for the site to include a family Recreation Area camp (tent camping, RV camping, possibly convenience camping* group camp, and potential water trail camp. Diablo Foothills Regional LUP amendment to include a backpack and equestrian camp Park at Castle Oaks along Shell Ridge. Sunol Wilderness Preserve* LUP amendment to convert the walk-in camp sites near the Visitor Center to a group picnic area and allow for a family, destination-oriented family convenience camp upstream from the day use area along the east side of Alameda Creek (see also below). Wildcat Canyon Regional Update the existing Land Use Plan to include a backpack and Park equestrian camp at the
Recommended publications
  • S Best Beaches South of San Francisco
    California’s Best Beaches South of San Francisco Author’s Note: This article “California’s Best Beaches South of San Francisco” is one of 30 chapters in my book/ebook Northern California Travel: The Best Options. That book is available in English as a book/ebook and also as an ebook in Chinese. Several of my books on California can be seen on myAmazon Author Page. See also my companion article “California’s Best Beaches North of San Francisco.” By Lee Foster If headed south from San Francisco on CA Highway 1, which are the loveliest beaches at which to linger? Here are my suggestions: Montara Beach, 10 miles south Montara Beach offers a classic beach experience and is my favorite in this region. You park on a bluff overlooking the south end of the beach. Stretching in front of you are a couple miles of sand, going north. The lookout is inviting. The beach is wide and welcoming. The surf is crashing. In the hours before sunset a golden glow from the west settles on the beach and cliffs behind it. Gingerly descend the stairs to the beach. The stairs get wiped out from time to time by storms. But then they get rebuilt. Walk north along the beach. Admire the thunderous surf. Gulp in the fresh air. Accept the glow of the sun from the west. Indulge in a near-wilderness experience, yet very close to San Francisco. A very few other people will be frolicking on the beach, perhaps with their dogs fetching sticks in the surf.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Showing Seacliff Response to Climatic And
    MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES MF-2399 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY C A 123 122 30' 122 LI 38 FO Table 1. Linear extent of cliff section experiencing slope failure for each of the time periods investigated. The data is further subdivided to Concord Map RN show the type of slope failure for each occurrence, as well as the geologic units involved, if distinguishable. Area INTRODUCTION I A The coastal cliffs along much of the central California coast are actively retreating. Large storms and periodic GULF OF THE earthquakes are responsible for most of the documented seacliff slope failures. Long-term average erosion rates calculated for FARALLONES Debris Debris this section of coast (Moore and others, 1999) do not provide the spatial or temporal data resolution necessary to identify the Time Interval BlBlock k OthOther TtTotalll along-cliffliff NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY Oakland processes responsible for retreat of the seacliffs, where episodic retreat threatens homes and community infrastructure. falls flows Slumps (m) Slaking (m) San fll(falls (m) ) ()(m) filfailure per itinterval l Francisco Research suggests that more erosion occurs along the California coast over a short time scale, during periods of severe storms (m) (m) Farallon or seismic activity, than occurs during decades of normal weather or seismic quiescence (Griggs and Scholar, 1998; Griggs, Islands 1994; Plant and Griggs, 1990; Griggs and Johnson, 1979 and 1983; Kuhn and Shepard, 1979). Livermore This is the second map in a series of maps documenting the processes of short-term seacliff retreat through the 0 130130.5 5 113113.4 4 identification of slope failure styles, spatial variability of failures, and temporal variation in retreat amounts in an area that has --------- 0 0 ------------- 0 0 243.9 Pacifica (i(instantaneous) t t ) been identified as an erosion hotspot (Moore and others, 1999; Griggs and Savoy, 1985).
    [Show full text]
  • Regional in Nature Activity Guide NOVEMBER – DECEMBER 2020
    Regional in Nature Activity Guide NOVEMBER – DECEMBER 2020 Check Our Website for Information on Reopenings - Camping, Boating, and Fishing. inside • Be a Pup Pro, page 3 • Ladybugs, page 10 • Bridging the Nature Gap, page 4 • Make a Weather Station, page 12 • Salmon Migration Season, page 7 • Winter Walks, page 15 New Shoreline Park Offers Spectacular Bay Views. See page 3. • Notable Native: Soaproot, page 9 • Building Bird Habitats, page 16 Contents REGIONAL PARKS HIT BY A message from Message from the GM ........ 2 Unprecedented Number general manager Be a Pup Pro! ........................ 3 OF WILDFIRES robert e. doyle Bridging Nature Gap ....... 4-5 Ardenwood ........................... 6 his year’s fire season has effort has continued, and our Wildland Fire Fighters Big Break ................................ 7 Tbeen extreme, both locally and were dispatched not only to our own area, but also statewide. As of this writing, over to assist CalFire in surrounding counties as requested. Black Diamond ..................... 8 8,320 CalFire incidents have been I am very proud of our own EBRPD heroes. Coyote Hills .......................... 9 tracked in California. In the East Bay, During the fires, our parks benefited from our continuous the SCU Complex Fire, started by Crab Cove ........................... 10 and ongoing trails and fuels maintenance programs and lightning in mid-August, included fires grazing. In many cases, the fires stopped at properly Del Valle ............................... 11 in Round Valley, Morgan Territory, maintained fire roads and slowed down in grazed Mission Peak, Sunol Wilderness, and grasslands. Grazing cattle also play an important role in Mobile Education ............... 12 Ohlone Wilderness regional parks. It burned 396,624 acres wildfire protection as “Four-Hoofed Firefighters”, reducing Outdoor Recreation ........
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Pleasanton Plan 2025
    2005 Pleasanton Plan 2025 7. CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Table of Contents page page BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE.................................................. 7-1 Tables SUSTAINABILITY ........................................................................ 7-1 Table 7-1 Potential Wildlife Species of Concern in the RESOURCE CONSERVATION ..................................................... 7-2 Planning Area ........................................................... 7-3 Animal Life.......................................................................... 7-2 Table 7-2 Potential Rare, Threatened, or Endangered Plants Plant Life............................................................................. 7-4 in the Planning Area .................................................. 7-6 Soil Resources ..................................................................... 7-9 Table 7-3 Historic Neighborhoods and Structures ..................... 7-15 Sand and Gravel............................................................... 7-10 Cultural Resources............................................................. 7-11 Figures OPEN SPACE LANDS............................................................... 7-18 Figure 7-1 Generalized Land Cover, 2005 .................................. 7-5 Recreational Open Space................................................... 7-18 Figure 7-2 Aggregate Resources and Reclamation ...................... 7-12 Water Management, Habitat, and Recreation...................... 7-24 Figure 7-3 Historic Neighborhoods
    [Show full text]
  • Pitch Canker Kills Pines, Spreads to New Species and Regions
    Pitch canker kills pines, Page 1 of 8 Return to Previous Page Pitch canker kills pines, spreads to new species and regions Andrew J. Storer o Thomas R. Gordon o Paul L. Dallara o David L. Wood California Agriculture, Vol. 48, No. 6, pages 9-13 The host and geographic range of the pitch canker pathogen has greatly increased since it was first discovered in California in 1986. Most significantly, it now affects many pine species, including native stands of Monterey pine, and has made a transgeneric jump to Douglas fir. Isolated occurrences of the disease have been found as far north as Mendocino County. Insects are strongly implicated as vectors of the pathogen, and long term management appears to be dependent on the development of resistant tree varieties. In infested regions, the planting of Monterey pine and other pine tree species should be undertaken with caution. Pitch canker disease was first identified in California at New Brighton State Beach, Santa Cruz County, in 1986. By the beginning of 1992, it was recorded as far north as San Francisco and as far south as San Diego County. Most records were from Monterey pine, but occasional infections of bishop, Coulter, Italian stone, Aleppo, ponderosa and Canary Island pine were reported. The most extensive infestations were in Santa Cruz and southern Alameda counties. In Southern California, with the exception of an isolated infestation in Santa Barbara County, only Monterey pine Christmas tree plantations were affected. Pitch canker disease, caused by the fungus Fusarium subglutinans f. sp. pini, is characterized by a resinous exudation on the surface of Trees with advanced pich canker symptoms have significant crown shoots, branches, exposed roots and boles of dieback due to the large number of infested trees.
    [Show full text]
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile
    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Progress Report Full Version 02 12.Indd
    CALIFORNIA RECREATIONAL TRAILS PLAN Providing Vision and Direction for California Trails Tahoe Rim Trail Tahoe Rim Trail TahoeTTahhoe RRiRimm TrailTTrail Complete Progress Report 2011 California State Parks Planning Division Statewide Trails Section www.parks.ca.gov/trails/trailsplan Message from the Director Th e ability to exercise and enjoy nature in the outdoors is critical to the physical and mental health of California’s population. Trails and greenways provide the facilities for these activities. Our surveys of Californian’s recreational use patterns over the years have shown that our variety of trails, from narrow back-country trails to spacious paved multi-use facilities, provide experiences that attract more users than any other recreational facility in California. Th e increasing population and desire for trails are increasing pressures on the agencies charged with their planning, maintenance and management. As leaders in the planning and management of all types of trail systems, California State Parks is committed to assisting the state’s recreation providers by complying with its legislative mandate of recording the progress of the California Recreational Trails Plan. During the preparation of this progress report, input was received through surveys, two California Recreational Trails Committee public meetings and a session at the 2011 California Trails and Greenways Conference. Preparation of this progress Above: Director Ruth Coleman report included extensive research into the current status of the 27 California Trail Corridors, determining which of these corridors need administrative, funding or planning assistance. Research and public input regarding the Plan’s twelve Goals and their associated Action Guidelines have identifi ed both encouraging progress and areas where more attention is needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Cruz County Parks Strategic Plan Appendix 1
    SANTA CRUZ COUNTY PARKS STRATEGIC PLAN APPENDIX 1 ParkScore® Index for the County of Santa Cruz, California Prepared by the Trust for Public Land November, 2017 As the leading U.S. organization that works to analyze and determine the value of urban parks, The Trust for Public Land has created a methodology to give a general rating of every major U.S. city’s park system through its proprietary program called ParkScore®. Santa Cruz County has a total population of 274,780 in 2017.1 It is located in the mid-coast of California at the north end of the Monterey Bay. The county is 285,522 acres2 making the density a little under 1 person per acre (0.96 people/acre). Of that acreage, 51,776 acres, or 18.1%, of Santa Cruz County are publically accessible parks, parkland, or open space. The county includes four incorporated municipalities. These are the cities of Capitola, Santa Cruz, Scotts Valley, and Watsonville (Table 1). Table 1. Incorporated cities of Santa Cruz County and populations City Population3 Capitola 10,180 Santa Cruz 64,465 Scotts Valley 11,928 Watsonville 53,796 Each of these municipalities operate parks, recreation Table 2. Parks, recreation, and open space amenities provided in facilities, or open space of their own. In addition, there Santa Cruz County are four special recreation and park districts in unincorporated areas that provide different combinations of these services (Table 2). These are independent of city and county governments and are governed by a board of directors.4 Parkland in the unincorporated part of the county is managed by the Santa Cruz County Department of Parks, Open Space, and Cultural Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Seacliff & New Brighton State Beaches
    Our Mission Seacliff & The mission of California State Parks is to provide for the health, inspiration and ong stretches of bluff- education of the people of California by helping L to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological New Brighton diversity, protecting its most valued natural and backed sandy beaches cultural resources, and creating opportunities State Beaches for high-quality outdoor recreation. invite visitors to play on the beach, watch a glorious sunset, or stroll peacefully along the shore. California State Parks supports equal access. Prior to arrival, visitors with disabilities who need assistance should contact the park at (831) 685-6500. If you need this publication in an alternate format, contact [email protected]. CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 For information call: (800) 777-0369 (916) 653-6995, outside the U.S. 711, TTY relay service www.parks.ca.gov Seacliff State Beach 201 State Park Drive, Aptos, CA 95003 (831) 685-6500 New Brighton State Beach Park Avenue off Hwy. 1, Capitola, CA 95010 (831) 464-6329 © 2002 California State Parks (Rev. 2016) A t Seacliff State Beach, a thwarting future plans for mile-long expanse of soft sand expansion. Today, the stripped, connects this popular recreation abandoned SS Palo Alto is unsafe spot with New Brighton State Beach, and closed to the public, as is where wooded bluffs provide part of the pier near the ship. unparalleled views of Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary. NEW BRIGHTON STATE BEACH SS Palo Alto In the 1850s, Thomas Fallon AREA HISTORY acquired part of Rancho Soquel years, beachfront camping, picnicking, The Ohlone Indians thrived for thousands and turned it into a resort he named New fishing, and interpretive walks have been of years on the area’s natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.4 Biological Resources
    Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail Network Master Plan EIR Section 4.4 Biological Resources 4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section addresses biological resources issues related to the proposed MBSST Network project described in Section 2.0, Project Description. A variety of terrestrial and aquatic habitats are present along the three distinct trail reaches (northern, central and Watsonville reaches) of the proposed MBSST Network. The proposed MBSST Network ranges in elevation from sea level to approximately 30 to 40 feet above sea level throughout the corridor. Portions of the proposed project are located within the Coastal Zone of Santa Cruz County. Rincon Consultants, Inc. biologists visited the site on December 3, 11, and 12, 2012 and conducted reconnaissance-level floral and wildlife surveys along the proposed MBSST Network. To support the field investigation, data on biological resources were collected from numerous sources, including relevant literature, maps of natural resources, and data on special- status species and sensitive habitat information obtained from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW, formerly the California Department of Fish and Game), California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) (2003; queried August 2012), the California Native Plant Society online Inventory of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Plants of California (2012), and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information, Planning and Conservation System (IPaC) (2012b). The USFWS Critical Habitat Mapper (2012a) and National Wetlands Inventory (NWI; 2012c) were also queried. 4.4.1 Setting a. Habitats. The proposed MBSST Network contains 12 habitats mapped by the CDFW California Wildlife Habitat Relationships (CWHR) habitat classification system (Table 4.4-1).
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Northern California's Potential
    Automated Template B: Created by James Nail 2011V2.1 Analysis of Northern California's potential geotourist sites for effective informal geoscience education that address the Earth Science Literacy Initiative's big ideas By Kimberlie Robin Theis A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Geoscience in the Department of Geosciences, Mississippi State, Mississippi May 2015 Copyright by Kimberlie Robin Theis May 2015 Analysis of Northern California's potential geotourist sites for effective informal geoscience education that address the Earth Science Literacy Initiative's big ideas By Kimberlie Robin Theis Approved: ____________________________________ Renee M. Clary (Major Professor) ____________________________________ John C. Rodgers III (Committee Member) ____________________________________ Darrel W. Schmitz (Committee Member) ____________________________________ Michael E. Brown (Graduate Coordinator) ____________________________________ R.Gregory Dunaway Professor and Dean College of Arts & Sciences Name: Kimberlie Robin Theis Date of Degree:May 9, 2015 Institution: Mississippi State University Major Field: Geoscience Major Professor:Dr. Renee M. Clary Title of Study: Analysis of Northern California's potential geotourist sites for effective informal geoscience education that address the Earth Science Literacy Initiative's big ideas Pages in Study:235 Candidate for Degree of Master of Science Geotourism is becoming more popular and can play a critical role in creating literacy in communities. Moreover, the Big Ideas of the Earth Science Literacy Initiative can be used within signage to address literacy. Because all citizens should have a basic knowledge of Earth Science in order to make informed decisions that relate to Earth Science, geotourism can be used as a way to increase Earth Science knowledge, along with other positive outcomes related to communities' increased well-being.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT REPORT CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING for REMOVAL of SUNOL and NILES DAMS Alameda County, California
    DRAFT REPORT CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING FOR REMOVAL OF SUNOL AND NILES DAMS Alameda County, California Prepared for: San Francisco Public Utilities Commission 1155 Market Street, 7th Floor San Francisco, California 94103 July 2003 Project No. 6959.021 July 17, 2003 Project No. 6959.021 Ms. Barbara Palacios San Francisco Public Utilities Commission 1155 Market Street, 7th Floor San Francisco, California 94103 Subject: Draft Report – Conceptual Engineering For Removal of Sunol and Niles Dams Alameda County, California Dear Ms. Palacios: Geomatrix Consultants, Inc. (Geomatrix) and HDR Engineering, Inc. (HDR) are pleased to submit the enclosed revised draft report, which presents the findings of our geologic/geotechnical assessment and presents conceptual engineering recommendations for the removal of Sunol and Niles dams. The study, conducted by Geomatrix and HDR, involved reviewing available information, conducting site-specific field investigations, laboratory testing, and developing conceptual-level engineering recommendations for the removal of both dams. Our study also involved evaluating potential socioeconomic and community issues (performed by Mara Feeney & Associates), along with potential traffic impacts on the local communities (performed by CHS Consulting Group). This revised draft report incorporates the PUC’s comments from review of our first draft report, dated June 2, 2003. Geomatrix and HDR have appreciated this opportunity to work with you. Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions about this report. We will finalize
    [Show full text]