DRAFT REPORT CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING for REMOVAL of SUNOL and NILES DAMS Alameda County, California

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DRAFT REPORT CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING for REMOVAL of SUNOL and NILES DAMS Alameda County, California DRAFT REPORT CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING FOR REMOVAL OF SUNOL AND NILES DAMS Alameda County, California Prepared for: San Francisco Public Utilities Commission 1155 Market Street, 7th Floor San Francisco, California 94103 July 2003 Project No. 6959.021 July 17, 2003 Project No. 6959.021 Ms. Barbara Palacios San Francisco Public Utilities Commission 1155 Market Street, 7th Floor San Francisco, California 94103 Subject: Draft Report – Conceptual Engineering For Removal of Sunol and Niles Dams Alameda County, California Dear Ms. Palacios: Geomatrix Consultants, Inc. (Geomatrix) and HDR Engineering, Inc. (HDR) are pleased to submit the enclosed revised draft report, which presents the findings of our geologic/geotechnical assessment and presents conceptual engineering recommendations for the removal of Sunol and Niles dams. The study, conducted by Geomatrix and HDR, involved reviewing available information, conducting site-specific field investigations, laboratory testing, and developing conceptual-level engineering recommendations for the removal of both dams. Our study also involved evaluating potential socioeconomic and community issues (performed by Mara Feeney & Associates), along with potential traffic impacts on the local communities (performed by CHS Consulting Group). This revised draft report incorporates the PUC’s comments from review of our first draft report, dated June 2, 2003. Geomatrix and HDR have appreciated this opportunity to work with you. Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions about this report. We will finalize the enclosed report upon receipt of the PUC’s written review comments. Sincerely yours, GEOMATRIX CONSULTANTS, INC. Faiz Makdisi, P.E. Todd Crampton, C.E.G. Principal Engineer Senior Geologist TAC \\sf3\deptdata\Project\6000s\6959.021\draft_report_02\.doc Enclosure TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...........................................................................................................1 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................2 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ...............................................................................................2 1.2 REPORT ORGANIZATION ..........................................................................................3 1.3 PROJECT TEAM AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................3 2.0 ALAMEDA CREEK WATERSHED ...............................................................................4 2.1 PREVIOUS STUDIES..................................................................................................4 2.2 COMMUNITY ISSUES (PREPARED BY MARA FEENEY & ASSOCIATES)........................5 2.2.1 Local Parks and Wilderness Areas............................................................7 2.2.2 Community and Local Environmental Groups..........................................7 2.2.3 Other Groups .............................................................................................8 2.2.4 Roadwork Planned for Highway 84 in Sunol Area...................................9 2.2.5 Summary of Conversations .......................................................................9 2.2.6 Preferred Methods of Communication ....................................................10 2.2.7 Individuals Contacted..............................................................................10 2.3 GEOLOGY..............................................................................................................10 2.4 HISTORICAL MINING ACTIVITIES IN THE WATERSHED ............................................12 2.5 DREDGING ACTIVITES IN THE WATERSHED ............................................................13 2.6 CREEK FLOWS .......................................................................................................14 3.0 SUNOL DAM REMOVAL.............................................................................................16 3.1 DESCRIPTION OF DAM............................................................................................16 3.2 SITE INVESTIGATIONS ...........................................................................................17 3.2.1 Review of Aerial Photographs.................................................................17 3.2.2 Geologic Mapping...................................................................................18 3.2.3 Sediment Sampling..................................................................................19 3.2.4 Laboratory Testing ..................................................................................20 3.3 SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT .....................................................................................20 3.3.1 Sediment Volume Estimates....................................................................20 3.3.2 Removal Strategies..................................................................................21 3.4 PROPOSED CREEK DIVERSION AND DEWATERING SYSTEMS ...................................23 3.5 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF DEMOLITION PLAN .........................................................26 3.5.1 Extent of Dam Removal ..........................................................................26 3.5.2 Demolition Method .................................................................................27 3.5.2.1 Dam Removal..............................................................................28 3.5.2.2 Dewatering & Diversion System Installation..............................31 3.5.2.3 Sediment Removal.......................................................................31 3.5.3 Construction and Staging Access ............................................................32 3.5.3.1 Staging Areas...............................................................................32 3.5.3.2 Fuel Handling and Equipment Maintenance ...............................33 3.5.3.3 Temporary Power and Telephone Service ..................................33 L:\Project\6000s\6959.021\report\draft_report_v02.doc i TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) 3.5.4 Traffic Impacts ........................................................................................33 3.5.5 Other Construction Issues........................................................................33 3.5.5.1 Site Access...................................................................................33 3.5.5.2 Work Adjacent to UPRR Main Line ...........................................33 3.5.5.3 Disposal Options .........................................................................34 3.6 COST ESTIMATES AND CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE.................................................34 3.6.1 Cost Estimate...........................................................................................34 3.6.2 Construction Schedule.............................................................................35 3.7 RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................36 4.0 NILES DAM REMOVAL...............................................................................................38 4.1 DESCRIPTION OF DAM............................................................................................38 4.2 SITE INVESTIGATIONS ...........................................................................................39 4.2.1 Review of Aerial Photographs.................................................................39 4.2.2 Geologic Mapping...................................................................................40 4.2.3 Sediment Sampling..................................................................................42 4.3 SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT .....................................................................................42 4.3.1 Sediment Volume Estimates....................................................................42 4.3.2 Removal Strategies..................................................................................43 4.4 PROPOSED CREEK DIVERSION AND DEWATERING SYSTEMS ...................................44 4.5 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF DEMOLITION PLAN .........................................................45 4.5.1 Extent of Dam Removal ..........................................................................45 4.5.2 Demolition Method .................................................................................46 4.5.2.1 Dam .............................................................................................46 4.5.2.2 Dewatering & Diversion System Installation..............................46 4.5.2.3 Sediment Removal.......................................................................47 4.5.3 Construction and Staging Access ............................................................47 4.5.3.1 Staging Areas...............................................................................47 4.5.3.2 Fuel Handling and Equipment Maintenance ...............................47 4.5.3.3 Temporary Power and Telephone Service ..................................48 4.5.4 Traffic Impacts ........................................................................................48 4.5.5 Other Construction Issues........................................................................48 4.5.5.1 Site Access...................................................................................48 4.5.5.2 Discussion of Access Alternatives ..............................................51 4.5.5.3 Disposal Options .........................................................................52
Recommended publications
  • Regional in Nature Activity Guide NOVEMBER – DECEMBER 2020
    Regional in Nature Activity Guide NOVEMBER – DECEMBER 2020 Check Our Website for Information on Reopenings - Camping, Boating, and Fishing. inside • Be a Pup Pro, page 3 • Ladybugs, page 10 • Bridging the Nature Gap, page 4 • Make a Weather Station, page 12 • Salmon Migration Season, page 7 • Winter Walks, page 15 New Shoreline Park Offers Spectacular Bay Views. See page 3. • Notable Native: Soaproot, page 9 • Building Bird Habitats, page 16 Contents REGIONAL PARKS HIT BY A message from Message from the GM ........ 2 Unprecedented Number general manager Be a Pup Pro! ........................ 3 OF WILDFIRES robert e. doyle Bridging Nature Gap ....... 4-5 Ardenwood ........................... 6 his year’s fire season has effort has continued, and our Wildland Fire Fighters Big Break ................................ 7 Tbeen extreme, both locally and were dispatched not only to our own area, but also statewide. As of this writing, over to assist CalFire in surrounding counties as requested. Black Diamond ..................... 8 8,320 CalFire incidents have been I am very proud of our own EBRPD heroes. Coyote Hills .......................... 9 tracked in California. In the East Bay, During the fires, our parks benefited from our continuous the SCU Complex Fire, started by Crab Cove ........................... 10 and ongoing trails and fuels maintenance programs and lightning in mid-August, included fires grazing. In many cases, the fires stopped at properly Del Valle ............................... 11 in Round Valley, Morgan Territory, maintained fire roads and slowed down in grazed Mission Peak, Sunol Wilderness, and grasslands. Grazing cattle also play an important role in Mobile Education ............... 12 Ohlone Wilderness regional parks. It burned 396,624 acres wildfire protection as “Four-Hoofed Firefighters”, reducing Outdoor Recreation ........
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Pleasanton Plan 2025
    2005 Pleasanton Plan 2025 7. CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Table of Contents page page BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE.................................................. 7-1 Tables SUSTAINABILITY ........................................................................ 7-1 Table 7-1 Potential Wildlife Species of Concern in the RESOURCE CONSERVATION ..................................................... 7-2 Planning Area ........................................................... 7-3 Animal Life.......................................................................... 7-2 Table 7-2 Potential Rare, Threatened, or Endangered Plants Plant Life............................................................................. 7-4 in the Planning Area .................................................. 7-6 Soil Resources ..................................................................... 7-9 Table 7-3 Historic Neighborhoods and Structures ..................... 7-15 Sand and Gravel............................................................... 7-10 Cultural Resources............................................................. 7-11 Figures OPEN SPACE LANDS............................................................... 7-18 Figure 7-1 Generalized Land Cover, 2005 .................................. 7-5 Recreational Open Space................................................... 7-18 Figure 7-2 Aggregate Resources and Reclamation ...................... 7-12 Water Management, Habitat, and Recreation...................... 7-24 Figure 7-3 Historic Neighborhoods
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Mitigated Negative Declaration Sunol Long Term Improvements Project Planning Department Case No
    SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT Written comments should be sent to: Timothy Johnston 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103 [email protected] Preliminary Mitigated Negative Declaration Sunol Long Term Improvements Project Planning Department Case No. 2012.0054E Preliminary MND Publication Date: February 18, 2015 Preliminary MND Public Comment Period: February 18, 2015–March 20, 2015 Preliminary Mitigated Negative Declaration Date: February 18, 2015 Case No.: 2012.0054E Project Title: 505 Paloma Road, Sunol, CA Sunol Long Term Improvements Project Parcel Nos.: 96-375-12-2; 96-375-14 Project Site Size: Approximately 44 acres including access and staging areas Lead Agency: San Francisco Planning Department Staff Contact: Timothy Johnston – (415) 575-9035 [email protected] PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) proposes to implement the Sunol Long Term Improvements (SLTI) Project (the “project”), which is comprised of two main elements: improvements to the existing Sunol Corporation Yard (Sunol Yard) and development of a new interpretive center, to be named “the Alameda Creek Watershed Center” (Watershed Center), in the vicinity of the Sunol Water Temple. The proposed project site is located in a primarily rural setting, south of the Town of Sunol and west of the State Route 84/Interstate 680 junction, in Alameda County, California. Adjoining the project site are gravel quarry operations, the Sunol Water Temple and Agricultural Park, Alameda Creek, Arroyo de la Laguna, SFPUC water supply facilities, and the Town of Sunol. The project would be implemented at two areas within the SFPUC property located 505 Paloma Road, in Sunol, CA.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Regional Water System Report
    San Francisco Public Utilities Commission 2018 State of the Regional Water System Report State of the Regional Water System September 2018 San Francisco Public Utilities Commission September 2018 1 San Francisco Public Utilities Commission 2018 State of the Regional Water System Report List of Contributors: Manouchehr Boozarpour Mary Ellen Carroll Jason Chen John Chester Eric Choi Jonathan Chow Fonda Davidis Andrew DeGraca Alexis Dufour Anna Fedman Stacie Feng Ed Forner Josh Gale Nancy Hom Margaret Hannaford Annie Li Nicholas Martin Adam Mazurkiewicz Chris Nelson Tim Ramirez Scott Riley Brian Rolley Ken Salmon Enio Sebastiani Eddy So Shailen Talati Dan Wade James West Mike Williams Derrick Wong San Francisco Public Utilities Commission September 2018 2 San Francisco Public Utilities Commission 2018 State of the Regional Water System Report Table of Contents 1. Overview........................................................................................................................................... 13 1.1 Purpose of this Report ............................................................................................................... 13 1.2 Value Added Under Water System Improvement Program ...................................................... 14 1.3 Continuing to Invest .................................................................................................................. 15 1.4 Recent Notable Events .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sunol-Ohlone Regional Wilderness Il Rd
    l Sunol-Ohlone Regional Wilderness il Rd. n SUNOL th o o d s y Rd . o a o s n F o llecit Pleasanton le a R Va Alameda i C N A Ridge Creek l ANIMALS Hikers may see bobcats, raccoons, and deer. WELCOME! am Regional Reg. Trail Old ed a C Sunol Year opened: 1962 Acres: 6,858 Canyon Vargas a Park l Campers may observe bats catching insects at night and Please enjoy the Regional Parks safely, and help Road a Plateau v e North Highlights: Old Green Barn Visitor Center, wilder- Mission C r r a hear the sounds of coyotes, owls, and foxes. Mountain protect and preserve the parklands by complying Regional e e s a k lt Park Regional Wilderness ness hiking, picnicking, backpack camping, access Pera Av. 680 R lions are uncommon, but occasionally sighted, as are with park rules and regulations. o a Paseo Padre Bl. d 012 Miles to Ohlone Wilderness Trail. reptiles, including western pond turtles and rattlesnakes. SAFETY and ETIQUETTE Blvd. FREMONT Sunol, Pleasanton, Livermore Did you know? Indian Joe Creek Trail was named ry Late summer/fall marks the emergence of male tarantulas • Stay on trails. Taking shortcuts can be dangerous and w P o kw for Joe Binoco, who worked as a ranch hand for the n y. M o lch during the mating season. Newts breed in ponds during causes erosion. s We n Washin l. Ohlone C Roa e gton B Mission re ek d Geary family and for Willis Brinker. v G e Wilderness e winter.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery Zone a World of Natural Wonders (Both New and Familiar) Awaits Visitors in the East Bay Regional Parks
    SUMMER 2017 Discovery Zone A WORLD OF NATURAL WONDERS (BOTH NEW AND FAMILIAR) AWAITS VISITORS IN THE EaST BaY REGIONAL PARKS IN THIS ISSUE: SPOTLIGht ON CAMPinG P. 4 | CONSERVAtiON EFFORts in the DistRICT P. 6 | PARK SAFetY P. 16 DID YOU PROTECTING OUR ENVIRONMENT The dedication of the Dotson Family Marsh in April KNOW? Fun facts about the celebrated one of the East Bay Regional Park District’s East Bay Regional recent restoration projects and illustrated its ongoing Park District commitment to climate change adaptation. The rise in sea level is just one of the ramifications of climate change, and the Dotson Family Marsh was designed to offset such effects through 2080. The Regional Parks Foundation shares that commitment to protecting our natural resources. One of the Foundation’s core programs, aided by generous Donors, is Environmental Restoration and Habitat Enhancement—helping to keep parklands and wildlife healthy. The creation of the Shorebird Sanctuary at Martin Luther King Jr. Regional Shoreline and cleanup efforts at Strawberry Cove and on park trails are a few of the Foundation-supported projects you’ll read about in this issue. Hours spent in the parks are not only about work, of course. There are many areas to explore and breathtaking vistas to revel in for the first (or the 50th) time. Witnessing a new wonder, or sharing 9 a secret spot with a friend, is part of what makes living in this beautiful The minimum age of volunteers and diverse region special. So smell the flowers at the Dry Creek at the Little Farm Garden, say hi to one of EBRPD’s mounted patrol horses—or find your own unique discovery in the parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting Packet
    REVISED July 20, 2021 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Board Meeting Packet SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AT THE EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, JULY 20, 2021 at 1:00 pm Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order No. N-29-20 and the Alameda County Health Officer’s Shelter in Place Orders, the East Bay Regional Park District Headquarters will not be open to the public and the Board of Directors and staff will be participating in the Board meetings via phone/video conferencing. Members of the public can listen and view the meeting in the following way: Via the Park District’s live video stream which can be found at https://youtu.be/e87Tch3yvBk Public comments may be submitted one of three ways: 1. Via email to Yolande Barial Knight, Clerk of the Board, at [email protected]. Email must contain in the subject line public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item #. It is preferred that these written comments be submitted by Monday, July 19, 2021 at 3:00 pm. 2. Via voicemail at (510) 544-2016. The caller must start the message by stating public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item # followed by their name and place of residence, followed by their comments. It is preferred that these voicemail comments be submitted by Monday, July 19, 2021 at 3:00 pm. 3. Live via zoom. If you would like to make a live public comment during the meeting this option is available through the virtual meeting platform: *Note: this virtual meeting platform link will let you into the https://zoom.us/j/98698918978 virtual meeting for the purpose of providing a public comment.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco San Francisco, CA 94102 T 415.554.3155 Water P Er Sewer F 415.554.3161 Operator of the Hetch Hetchy Regional Water System TTY 415.554.3488
    525 Golden Gate Avenue, 12th Floor San Francisco San Francisco, CA 94102 T 415.554.3155 Water P er Sewer F 415.554.3161 Operator of the Hetch Hetchy Regional Water System TTY 415.554.3488 Alameda Watershed East Bay Facilities Tour Itinerary Sunol CAC Wednesday, April 11, 2018 9:00 a.m. Group Meets in parking lot at Sunol Regional Trailer 8653 Calaveras Road, Sunol Board Vehicles 9:15 -10:15 a.m. Tour of Sunol Valley Water Treatment Plant 10:15-10:30 a.m . Transit to Alameda East Portal 10:30 to 11 :00 a.m. Alameda East Portal Tour 11 :00 to 11: 15 a.m. Transit to Turner Dam (San Antonio Reservoir) 11 :15 to 11 :45 a.m. Tour of Turner Dam 11 :45 to noon Transit back to Regional Trailer. Tour Ends Mark Farrell Mayor Ike Kwon President Vince Courtney Vice President Ann Moller Caen Commissioner Francesca Vietor Commissioner Anson Moran Commissioner Harlan L. Kelly, Jr. General Manager Services of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission OUR MISSION: To provide our customers with high-quality, efficient and reliable water, power and sewer services in a manner that values environmental and community interests and sustains the resources entrusted to our care. Sunol Valley Regional Projects 1 HETCH HETCHY WATER SYSTEM Fact' Bheet ~Services of !~1tSan Francisco IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Public Utilities Commission April 2018 www.sfwater.org/sunolvalley What's Happening in Sunol Valley Happy spring! 2018 has been a very dry year in the valley. The good sunny weather has allowed our Sunol Valley projects teams to continue the important work to seismically upgrade the facilities that deliver drinking water to 2.6 million Bay Area customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Peak Regional Preserve: High Sierra...Spread out Between Is the Great Plain of (510) 544-3220, Or See
    580 DUBLIN Mission Peak 580 SANTA RITA LIVERMORE Palomares ROAD F VALLEY Shadow Bridge, and eastward is Sunol Regional Wilderness. Ridge PA O HOPYARD RD. AV. Highlights: Hiking, biking, backpack camping, dog LO O Clis STANLEY BLVD. M T Mission Peak No drinking water is available along the trails. A H R Pleasanton IL E L walking, and horseback riding. S Ridge R R VINEYARD Wear sturdy hiking shoes. Keep the area free of litter O D PLEASANTON AD . BERNAL Regional Preserve AV. “Perhaps the denizens of this valley are so accus- so others may enjoy the beauty as you do. AV. The Wings of Rogallo has an agreement with the Garin tomed to the sight of Mission Peak that they fail to GARIN Reg. Park Fremont, Newark Park District to conduct hang gliding and paragliding MISSIONAV BLVD.. appreciate the dignity and individuality which it gives Dry Creek/ to the landscape. Whether the outlines, snow-capped activities at the Preserve, so while at the peak, don’t be Pioneer 84 surprised if a quiet hang glider whisks ’round the peak UNION may be, are sharp and distinct on a clear, frosty morn- CITY or overhead. You can wave to the pilot – at eye level. SUNOL VALLECITOS ROAD ing in winter, or overspread with the purple afterglow NILES RD. NILES CANYON RD. DECOTO RD. Vargas The South Bay Soaring Society (SBSS) has an CALAVERAS ROAD of a summer sunset; whether rising grim and rugged Plateau PA Quarry SEO VARGAS 680 agreement with the Park District to use R/C Hill to FREMONT P Lakes against black storm clouds, or emerging into sunlight A D R MISSION BLVD.RD.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordinance 38 Table of Contents Chapter I
    ORDINANCE 38 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I - DEFINITIONS Section 100 General 1 Section 101 District Defined 1 Section 102 Person Defined 1 Section 103 Permission Defined 1 Section 104 Board Defined 1 Section 105 Headings and Divisions 1 CHAPTER II - REGULATIONS Section 200 General Regulations 2 200.1 All persons shall abide by the rules and regulations 2 200.2 Exemptions; employees and concessionaires 2 Section 201 Special Regulations 2 CHAPTER III - GENERAL RULES Section 300 Authority 3 Section 301 Violations Infraction or Misdemeanor 3 Section 302 Severability 3 Section 303 Amendment or Repeal 3 (M) Section 304 False Information To a Peace Officer 3 CHAPTER IV - PARK USES GENERAL Section 400 Camping 4 400.1 No person shall camp after closing 4 (M) 400.2 No person shall operate a generator or sound amplification device 4 (M) 400.3 No person shall exceed the following family campground restrictions 4 a) Maximum number of vehicles 4 b) Maximum occupants 4 c) Maximum length of stay 4 (M) 400.4 No juvenile shall camp except 4 a) When accompanied by parent 4 b) Who has parent’s written consent 4 c) Who is part of a group 4 d) Juvenile defined 4 Section 401 Swimming 4 (I) 401.1 General 4 401.2 Definition 4 401.3 Incontinent Individuals 4 (M) Section 402 Drowning: False Reports 5 Section 403 Firearms and Dangerous Weapons (M) = Misdemeanor (T-1) (I) = Infraction (M) 403.1 Restriction 5 403.2 Exception 5 a) Unloaded firearms 5 b) At a place of residence or business 5 c) Firearms ranges and transportation to and from 5 d) The use of a bow and arrow
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Adopted Project and Program Budget
    2020 Short Michael Photo: Adopted Project and Program Budget Miller/Knox Regional Shoreline, Richmond Board of Directors L – R: Ayn Wieskamp, Ward 5; Dee Rosario, Ward 2; Elizabeth Echols, Ward 1; Ellen Corbett, Ward 4; Beverly Lane, Ward 6; Dennis Waespi, Ward 3; Colin Coffey, Ward 7 Robert E. Doyle, General Manager Budget Team Robert E. Doyle, General Manager Ana Alvarez, Deputy General Manager Debra Auker, Assistant General Manager, Finance and Management Services Division Deborah Spaulding, Assistant Finance Officer Mary Brown, Acting Budget Manager 2020 Adopted Project and Program Budget This page intentionally left blank PROJECT & PROGRAM BUDGET TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT MAP OF 2020 PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS .............. 322 INTRODUCTORY MESSAGE & GUIDE TO THE PROGRAM & PROJECT BUDGET .......... 325 PROJECTS DEFINED ................................................................................................. 326 PROGRAMS DEFINED ............................................................................................... 329 PROJECT PRIORITIZATION PROCESS .................................................................... 332 GUIDE TO PROJECT & PROGRAM FUNDING SOURCES ....................................... 332 SUMMARY FUNDING CHARTS ................................................................................. 339 PROJECTS BY PARK LOCATION ALAMEDA POINT (NAVAL AIR STATION) REGIONAL SHORELINE ......................... 345 ANTHONY CHABOT REGIONAL PARK ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • "In the Past Decade, the Center for Biological Diversity Has Become the East Bay's Most Aggressive and Prominent Environmental Group "
    "In the past decade, the Center for Biological Diversity has become the East Bay's most aggressive and prominent environmental group " From eastbayexpress.com Originally published by East Bay Express 2006-04-12 ©2005 New Times, Inc. All rights reserved. We're Outta Here! A massive mining operation near the Sunol-Ohlone wilderness will send the East Bay's coveted elk and eagles fleeing, to say nothing of the hikers. By Robert Gammon Galen Rowell To developer Ed DeSilva, the rocks are worth more than the elk standing on them. Justin Page This map shows Ed DeSilva's quarry plan. Robert Gammon An estimated 123 million tons of rock will be blasted from Apperson Ridge in the coming 2 decades. Oakland Tribune "Big Ed" DeSilva David Gregoire After the mine opens, says a golden eagle expert, the birds will likely stop reproducing. Chris Duffey This photo of DeSilva's almost-spent Dumbarton quarry shows the scope of such an operation. The white speck near bottom right is a pickup. From 1984 Environmental Impact Report Apperson Ridge before mining. From 1984 Environmental Impact Report Apperson Ridge after (artist's rendition) completion of the mining operation. Who / What: Ed DeSilva Sunol-Ohlone tule elk golden eagle Apperson Ridge News Category: Environment Throughout the year, visitors to Sunol and Ohlone Regional Wilderness parks can spot black-tailed deer darting in and out of the oak-studded brush or watch red-tailed hawks soar high above the grassy ridge lands. In spring, waterfalls in Sunol's "Little Yosemite" gush with winter runoff, and wildflowers blanket the rolling hillsides in orange, yellow, and blue.
    [Show full text]