Download 2005 Annual Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download 2005 Annual Review INTERNET SOCIETY 2005 ANNUAL REPORT CONNECTING THE UNCONNECTED THROUGH OPEN STANDARDS, POLICY, AND EDUCATION OUR VISION TABLE OF CONTENTS The Internet Society believes that the Internet is for everyone. FOREWORD BY FRED BAKER From its inception the mission of the Internet Society has been to CHAIR, BOARD OF TRUSTEES ..........................................................1 promote the open development, evolution, and use of the Internet FOREWORD BY LYNN ST AMOUR for the benefit of all people throughout the world. PRESIDENT AND CEO....................................................................1 People in all parts of the world can use the Internet to improve their quality of life because the standards, technologies, business ISOC IN 2005 practices, and government policies connected with the Internet A YEAR IN REVIEW......................................................................2 sustain an open, universally accessible platform for innovation, creativity, and economic opportunity. WHAT IS THE INTERNET SOCIETY? ..................................................5 Complementing its vision of the future is the Internet Society’s vision RELATED ORGANISATIONS of its role in creating that future: As the hub of a global network IETF AND PIR ............................................................................7 of individuals and organisations, the Internet Society is an effective advocate for the core values of an open and accessible Internet. PLANS FOR THE FUTURE ISOC GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ........................................................8 MEMBERS, CHAPTERS, AND PARTNERS GLOBAL PRESENCE, LOCAL STRENGTH ................................................9 FINANCIAL REPORT ..................................................................14 NOTES ON FINANCIAL INFORMATION ..............................................16 FOR MORE INFORMATION ..........................................................17 Copyright © Internet Society 2006.All rights reserved. FOREWORDS BY FRED BAKER AND LYNN ST. AMOUR FOREWORD BY FRED BAKER FOREWORD BY LYNN ST. AMOUR CHAIR, BOARD OF TRUSTEES PRESIDENT AND CEO Since its inception, the Internet blueprint that leverages the orga- I am pleased to report that in work to ensure that the Internet Society has dedicated itself to the nisation’s collective expertise, skills, all three of the Internet Society’s key remains open and accessible to all, openS development, evolution, and and influence and propels ISOC Ifocus areas—Standards, Public but also in such areas as capacity use of the Internet for the benefit of into the future. Policy, and Education—2005 was a building for developing countries, all people throughout the world. year of significant progress. The ISOC has made great strides over the multilingualisation, trust models, and Our success is due in large part to a Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) past few years. Today we are regu- the Net Neutrality issue, which sur- set of beliefs that have guided our established the IETF Administrative larly featured in global policy faced last year. Hence a significant mission and informed our actions. Support Activity within ISOC, there- forums, speaking on behalf of our portion of our work in the years to We believe the Internet is a critical by deepening ISOC’s relationship members and the Internet commu- come will be in the areas of techni- tool for the advancement of eco- with the IETF. We are now widely nity, particularly with regard to cal education and policy, where we nomic growth, community self- recognised for contributions to Internet Governance. We remain expect to work more closely than reliance, and social justice through- the global debate on Internet committed to building capacity in ever with our members, chapters, out the world. We believe in its Governance. And we have not only all corners of the world, which we and partner organisations. ability to empower individuals and expanded our efforts to educate achieve through education and train- Fred Baker to increase access to education and The successes of the past year would ing programmes that reach even policy makers across the world but opportunity. More than that, we not have been possible without con- the most remote locations. And we have also increased our training and believe it gives each and every one tinuing support by our Organisation continually work toward increasing education activities in developing of us a voice. and Individual members, Chapter support for the Internet’s premier countries. Those accomplishments Connecting those beliefs to a set of standards-making body, the Internet and the global recognition they participants, and partner organisa- strategies is where the real work of Engineering Task Force, as it works bring mean ISOC is better positioned tions, nor would they have been the Internet Society begins. In 2005, to advance its own efforts in an to advance the Internet for the possible without the leadership the Internet Society engaged in increasingly complex and demanding benefit of all people than it has demonstrated by ISOC’s Board of the development of a Strategic environment. been in any time in its history. Trustees. Your support of ISOC—and Operating Plan. Those of you with your belief in the vision of the We thank all of you for your con- At ISOC we believe the quality of life similar experience can appreciate Internet that we hold—helped us tribution to the successes of 2005. for people in all parts of the world both the tangible and intangible realise many of our goals and objec- And we look forward to building is enhanced by the ability to enjoy benefits of such an endeavour. tives in 2005. I look forward to on those successes next year and the benefits of an open and global Guided by the vision and the princi- beyond. Internet. However, challenges working with all of you on the ples set by ISOC’s Board of Trustees, remain: not only in the area of challenges that lie ahead. Thank you ISOC’s dedicated staff created a Lynn St. Amour Internet Governance, where we for your support. 1 INTERNET SOCIETY 2005 ANNUAL REPORT ISOC IN 2005 A YEAR IN REVIEW During 2005, ISOC-supported by the IETF community, as well as of the IETF are expected to be a review of the previous IETF meet- programmes and projects con- appropriate ex officio members from assigned to the IETF Trust. ing, including reports from specific tributed greatly to increasing techni- the ISOC and IETF leadership—directs D The IETF Journal, published in IETF areas or Working Groups, and cal competence as well as to raising and oversees the IASA’s operations. coordination with the IETF, was spotlights a few of the hot issues awareness of policy and social issues ISOC is pleased to announce that the launched at IETF 63 in Paris. Formally being discussed at IETF meetings By the end of 2005, concerning the many facets of the IAOC successfully negotiated a con- published by ISOC, the journal pro- and in IETF mailing lists. Internet. ISOC, along with the IETF tract with NeuStar Secretariat vides a clear and comprehensive overview of what’s happening with PUBLIC POLICY and the IETF Administrative INTERNET STANDARDS Services to provide administrative ISOC’s public policy initiatives took support for the IETF for its secretariat Internet standards, with a particular Oversight Committee, A number of noteworthy achieve- and meeting requirements. The focus on the activities of the IETF on greater significance in 2005, from ments marked 2005, including completed the final elements new arrangement took effect on Working Groups. Each issue provides playing a central role in the Internet the launch of the new IETF December 15, 2005. ISOC and the of the IETF's administrative Administrative Support Activity IETF extend warmest thanks to Dr. (IASA), which was made possible restructuring. This strength- Robert Kahn and CNRI for the many through funding and support by years of support they provided and ened the relationship ISOC. The successful restructuring for their role in completing a suc- between ISOC and the of the IETF administrative functions, cessful transition. as well as the appointment of an IETF and will allow both administrative director, is designed In 2005, ISOC announced the organisations to leverage to ensure accountability and trans- creation of the IETF Trust. The trust, our respective competencies parency of the IETF administrative a private entity established under the and fiscal activities to the IETF com- laws of Virginia, allows assets, such to even greater benefit munity. It is also expected to have as intellectual property rights (IPR) for the Internet. significant impact on the Internet and other property, to be held and standards-making community as well administered for the benefit of the as on the Internet community at IETF and, by extension, the Internet large. A newly formed IETF Admin- standards process. At initial signing, istrative Oversight Committee both CNRI and ISOC put all existing (IAOC)—composed of volunteers, all IETF-related IPR into the IETF Trust. of them chosen directly or indirectly All old or new IPR created on behalf 2 ISOC IN 2005 are essential components of the EDUCATION communications infrastructure and With generous support from the available to all societies worldwide. Public Interest Registry (PIR), the ISOC changed the model of its pre- Workshop Resource Centre mier Internet policy event—INET— (WRC), a joint venture between from a global event to a regional ISOC and the Network Startup Resource Center, has successfully event, reflecting
Recommended publications
  • “The Past and Future of the Internet”
    “The Past and Future of the Internet” presented by Dr Glenn Ricart – Ph.D Synopsis: Glenn Ricart will share some of his first-hand stories about how the ARPAnet grew into an international commercial Internet during the 1980s. Then, looking forward, Dr. Ricart will turn to the developments which he believes will need to take place in technology, economics, and politics in order to allow the Internet to continue to grow. Glitches and weaknesses which are tolerable for an entertainment medium will not be acceptable as Internets become more integral to the economy, health and safety, and national defense. Curriculum Vitae: Dr. Glenn Ricart is an Internet pioneer and entrepreneur with a broad range of technology and business leadership experience in large corporations, startups, academia, the U.S. military, and government research. His positions have included President and CEO of National LambdaRail, Managing Director at PricewaterhouseCoopers, Co-founder and Chief Technology Officer of CenterBeam, and Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer for Novell. He is known for his pioneering work in bringing the ARPAnet protocols into academic and commercial use. In the mid-1980s, while academic CIO at the University of Maryland College Park, his teams created the first implementation of TCP/IP for the IBM PC; created the first campus-wide TCP/IP network, shipped and managed the software that powered the first non-military TCP/IP national network, the NSFnet; created the first open Internet interchange point (the FIX and later MAE-EAST); and proposed and created the first operating NSFnet regional network, SURAnet. From 1995-1999 he was Novell's EVP and Chief Technology Officer responsible for its technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview Kees Neggers
    Kees Neggers, internationaal baanbrekend vanuit Surfnet ‘Het was voortdurend spitsroeden lopen’ Kees Neggers vond na een loopbaan van 16 jaar in de schaduw bij Surfnet zijn plek om op grote schaal technisch te gaan innoveren, tot en met de recente opname in de Internet Hall of Fame. Bij nagenoeg alle belangrijke internationale wetenschapsnetwerken was hij betrokken. Loopbaan 1947, 20 juli geboren te Breda 1972 Elektrotechnisch Ingenieur TU/e 1972-1973 Luchtmacht Afdeling Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1974-1975 Wetenschappelijk ambtenaar TU/e Elektrotechniek 1975-1980 Beleidsmedewerker Rekencentrum Rijksuniversiteit Groningen 1980-1984 Directielid Rekencentrum Rijksuniversiteit Groningen 1984-1988 Directielid Rekencentrum Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen 1988-2012 Directielid Surfnet 2012-heden Strategisch Adviseur Surf Verder 1984-1994 Directeur Nederland en bestuurslid EARN (European Academic and Research Network) 1986-1994 Bestuurslid RARE (Réseaux Associés pour la Recherche Européenne) 1995-2001 Bestuurslid TERENA (Trans-European Research and Education Networking Association – Opvolger RARE) 1990-2012 European Co-Chair CCIRN (Coordinating Committee for Intercontinental Research Networking) 1991-1994 Initiatiefnemer en voorzitter netwerk Ebone 1992-1998 Betrokken bij opzet Ripe NCC 1998-2000 Charter member RIPE NCC Executive Board 2000-2008 Chairman Ripe NCC Executive Board 1992-1996 Charter member Board of Trustees Internet Society 1997 Betrokken bij opzet Isoc.nl 1994-1998 Betrokken bij opzet Ams-Ix 1998-2004 Bestuur Internet Society 2001-heden Voorzitter GLIF (Global Lambda Integrated Facility) 2002 Met Boudewijn Nederkoorn ICT Personality of the Year 2002 2008-heden vertegenwoordiger e-IRG (e-Infrastructure Reflection Group) 2012 Officier in de Orde van Oranje Nassau 2013 Opgenomen in Internet Hall of Fame 1 Foto’s: Frank Groeliken Tekst: Peter Olsthoorn 2 U heeft ongeveer 30 jaar internet in Europa van nabij meegemaakt.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Magazine February 2002
    FEBRUARY 2002 CORE 3.1 A PUBLICATION OF THE COMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM WWW.COMPUTERHISTORY.ORG PAGE 1 February 2002 OUR ACTIONS TODAY COREA publication of the Computer History3.1 Museum IN THIS MISSION ISSUE TO PRESERVE AND PRESENT FOR POSTERITY THE ARTIFACTS AND STORIES OF THE INFORMATION AGE INSIDE FRONT COVER VISION OUR ACTIONS TODAY The achievements of tomorrow must be was an outstanding success, and I simply doesn’t exist anywhere else in TO EXPLORE THE COMPUTING REVOLUTION AND ITS John C Toole rooted in the actions we take today. hope you caught the impact of these the world. With your sustained help, our IMPACT ON THE HUMAN EXPERIENCE Many exciting and important events announcements that have heightened actions have been able to speak much 2 THE SRI VAN AND COMPUTER have happened since our last CORE awareness of our enterprise in the louder than words, and it is my goal to INTERNETWORKING publication, and they have been community. I’m very grateful to Harry see that we are able to follow through Don Nielson carefully chosen to strategically shape McDonald (director of NASA Ames), Len on our dreams! EXECUTIVE STAFF where we will be in five years. Shustek (chairman of our Board of 7 John C Toole David Miller Trustees), Donna Dubinsky (Museum This issue of CORE is loaded with THE SRI VAN AND EARLY PACKET SPEECH EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & CEO VICE PRESIDENT OF DEVELOPMENT 2 Don Nielson First, let me officially introduce our Trustee and CEO of Handspring), and technical content and information about Karen Mathews Mike Williams new name and logo to everyone who Bill Campbell (chairman of Intuit) who our organization—from a wonderful EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT HEAD CURATOR 8 has not seen them before.
    [Show full text]
  • Glenn Ricart Founder, US Ignite Adjunct Professor, University of Utah
    Glenn Ricart Founder, US Ignite Adjunct Professor, University of Utah Brief Bio Glenn Ricart is the Founder and Chief Technology Officer of US Ignite, a nonprofit organization with a mission to create an ecosystem of innovative applications in smart and connected communities leveraging emerging technologies. Technologies of special interest include wired and wireless gigabit to the end user, software-defined locavore infrastructure, software-defined performance engineering, and privacy and security through virtual infrastructure slicing. Dr. Ricart is also Adjunct Professor in the School of Computing at U. of Utah. Previously, Ricart was CEO of National LambdaRail, Managing Director of PricewaterhouseCoopers, Executive Vice President and CTO of Novell during its heyday in the 1990s, Assistant Vice Chancellor and academic CIO of the University of Maryland, and Program Manager at DARPA. He has also founded or co-founded five startups. His early work on the Internet has led to his induction into the Pioneer’s Circle of the Internet Hall of Fame. Research US Ignite will be coordinating the implementation of a Metropolitan SDX in at Directions and least 15 American Cities as part of its recent NSF grant, and can contribute sets of Related pragmatic issues that need to be resolved in the construction of the Metropolitan Testbed SDXes and suggestions for research directions that would improve the SDXes. Infrastructure These include: Requirements - Matching or translating or emulating or transforming characteristics across connections made by
    [Show full text]
  • NSFNET: the Partnership That Changed the World
    NSFNET: The Partnership that Changed the World Celebrating 20 Years of Internet Innovation and Progress November 29-30, 2007 Crystal Gateway Marriott, Arlington, Virginia Contents: Event Supporters 2 Program at a Glance 3 Detailed Agenda 4 - 8 Speaker Biographies 9 - 16 NSFNET: The Partnership that Changed the World 1 The organizers wish to thank the following organizations for supporting this event: Advanced Network & Services, Inc. www.advanced.org Cisco Systems, Inc. www.cisco.com IBM www.ibm.com Internet2 www.internet2.edu Juniper Networks www.juniper.net Merit Network, Inc. www.merit.edu National Science Foundation www.nsf.gov 2 Program at a Glance (see pages 4 - 8 for detailed program) Thursday, November 29, 2007 - General Program 7:30 - 8:30 a.m. Registration and Continental Breakfast 8:30 - 9:15 Welcome Speakers: Eric M. Aupperle and Jane Caviness The Internet History Archive Speaker: Doug Gale Introductory Comments Speaker: John H. Marburger, III Keynote - NSFNET: The Phenomenon Speaker: Douglas E. Van Houweling 9:20 - 10:35 Panel - NSFNET: The Beginnings Moderator: Lawrence Landweber 10:35 - 11:00 Break 11:00 - 11:55 Panel - NSFNET: The Solicitation & The Merit Partnership Moderator: Jane Caviness 11:55 - 12:45 Lunch 12:45 - 1:45 Panel - NSFNET: The T1—The Internet Comes of Age Moderator: Eric M. Aupperle 1:50 - 2:50 Panel - NSFNET: The T3 Backbone Service—The Internet Matures Moderator: Allan H. Weis 2:50 - 3:15 Break 3:15 - 4:35 Panel - NSFNET: The Community Moderator: Doug Gale 4:40 - 5:30 Panel - NSFNET: The Impact on Research and Science Moderator: George O.
    [Show full text]
  • Number 3, December 2019
    December 2019 Volume 22, Number 3 A Quarterly Technical Publication for From The Editor Internet and Intranet Professionals In This Issue “A major design feature of the Internet Protocol (IP) is its ability to run over a variety of underlying network technologies. If you look through the Request For Comments (RFC) document series, you will From the Editor ...................... 1 find numerous specifications of the form “IP over xxx,” where “xxx” is anything from Ethernet to X.25, Frame Relay, Bluetooth, WiFi, MSS Values of TCP ................ 2 and even “Avian Carriers” (pigeons), the latter being one of the more famous April Fools RFCs. Because each of these technologies has different capabilities in terms of how much data can be carried in a 50 Years of the Internet ........ 12 “packet” or datagram, IP employs the concept of fragmentation and reassembly in cases where the originating datagram is larger than what the underlying network medium can support.” Book Review......................... 15 That paragraph is a quote from our June 2016 issue (Volume 19, Letter to the Editor ............... 17 No. 2) in which Geoff Huston described various aspects of IPv4 and IPv6 fragmentation. In this issue he explains how the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and its concept of a Maximum Segment Size Fragments ............................. 18 (MSS) might interact with IP fragmentation even if this interaction is technically a “layer violation.” His article presents measurement data on TCP MSS handshakes recorded by APNIC in August 2019. Thank You! .......................... 24 The Internet has its origins in the Advanced Research Projects Agency Network (ARPANET), which began operation just over 50 years Call for Papers .....................
    [Show full text]
  • Securing BGP with Bgpsec by Geoff Huston, APNIC and Randy Bush, IIJ
    June 2011 Volume 14, Number 2 A Quarterly Technical Publication for From The Editor Internet and Intranet Professionals The process of adding security to various components of Internet architecture reminds me a little bit of the extensive seismic retrofit- In This Issue ting that has been going on in California for decades. The process is slow, expensive, and occasionally intensified by a strong earthquake after which new lessons are learned. Over the past 13 years this jour- From the Editor ...................... 1 nal has carried many articles about network security enhancements: IP Security (IPSec), Secure Sockets Layer (SSL), Domain Name Securing BGP .......................... 2 System Security Extensions (DNSSEC), Wireless Network Security, and E-mail Security, to name but a few. In this issue we look at rout- ing security again, specifically the efforts underway in the Secure IPv6 Site Multihoming .......... 14 Inter-Domain Routing (SIDR) Working Group of the IETF to provide a secure mechanism for route propagation in the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). The article is by Geoff Huston and Randy Bush. Reflecting on World IPv6 Day .................... 23 Our second article discusses Site Multihoming in IPv6. Multihoming is a fairly common technique in the IPv4 world, but as part of the devel- opment and deployment of IPv6, several new and improved solutions Letters to the Editor ............. 25 have been proposed. Fred Baker gives an overview of these solutions and discusses the implications of each proposal. Call for Papers ...................... 29 By all accounts, World IPv6 Day was a successful demonstration and an important step toward deployment of IPv6 in the global Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • La Historia Oculta De Internet a Través De Sus Personajes
    PARTE VIII LA HISTORIA OCULTA DE INTERNET A TRAVÉS DE SUS PERSONAJES LA HISTORIA OCULTA DE INTERNET..................................... 1 A TRAVÉS DE SUS PERSONAJES ............................................... 1 -Introducción y Objetivos- ........................................................... 1 -¿Metodología de realización?- .................................................... 1 -Algunas magnitudes del trabajo realizado- ................................. 4 -¿A Quién?-.................................................................................. 5 -Criterios de Selección- ................................................................ 5 -Idiomas- ...................................................................................... 5 -¿Cuáles han sido las preguntas?-................................................. 5 -A tener en cuenta- ....................................................................... 6 PARTE VIII: La Historia Oculta de Internet a Través de sus Personajes PARTE VIII: LA HISTORIA OCULTA DE INTERNET A TRAVÉS DE SUS PERSONAJES -Introducción y Objetivos- El apartado que aquí se presenta es el fruto de un proyecto, que tiene como objetivo principal, el dejar un registro escrito de las actividades de personas fundamentales en el desarrollo de la red; Que de manera a veces notoria y otras más veces discreta, contribuyeron decisivamente a la creación de internet y a su posterior difusión. Para focalizar el estudio, se ha profundizado en el contexto de la conectividad a internet, dejando de lado otros ámbitos
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of the Internet II
    The Future of the Internet II A survey of technology thinkers and stakeholders shows they believe the internet will continue to spread in a “flattening” and improving world. There are many, though, who think major problems will accompany technology advances by 2020 September 24, 2006 Janna Quitney Anderson, Elon University Lee Rainie, Director PEW INTERNET & AMERICAN LIFE PROJECT 1615 L STREET, NW – SUITE 700 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036 202-419-4500 http://www.pewinternet.org/ Summary of findings Technology thinkers and stakeholders assess the future social, political, and economic impact of the internet. Hundreds of internet leaders, activists, builders and commentators were asked about the effect of the internet on social, political and economic life in the year 2020. The views of the 742 respondents who completed this survey were varied; there is general agreement about how technology might evolve, but there is less agreement among these respondents about the impact of this evolution. Reacting to several scenarios constructed by the Pew Internet & American Life Project, the respondents struck on several themes and emergent problems in their answers: The deployment of a global network: A majority of respondents agreed with a scenario which posited that a global, low-cost network will be thriving in 2020 and will be available to most people around the world at low cost. And they agreed that a tech-abetted “flattening” of the world will open up opportunities for success for many people who will compete globally. Still, a vocal and sizeable minority of respondents say they are unsure that the policy climate will be favorable for such internet expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • Download 2006 Annual Review
    TA B L E OF CONTENTS FOREWORD BY DANIEL KARRENBERG OUR VISION CHAIR , BOARD OF TRUSTEES 1 From its inception the mission FOREWORD BY LYNN ST . AMOUR of the Internet Society has been PRESIDENT AND CEO 2 to promote the open develop- ment, evolution, and use of the ISOC IN 2006 Internet for the benefit of all A YEAR OF GROWTH , INFLUENCE , AND LEADERSHIP 3 people throughout the world. WHAT IS THE INTERNET SOCIETY ? 7 We believe the standards, tech- nologies, business practices, and RELATED ORGANISATIONS government and community- IETF AND PIR 9 driven policies connected with the Internet must sustain an open, MEMBERS , CHAPTERS , AND PARTNERS universally accessible platform GLOBAL PRESENCE , LOCAL STRENGTH 10 for innovation, creativity, and economic opportunity. In this PLANS FOR THE FUTURE way, the Internet can improve GROWTH , REFINEMENT , AND ONGOING IMPROVEMENT 16 the quality of life for people in all parts of the world. FOR MORE INFORMATION 17 Complementing its vision of the future is the Internet Society’s FINANCIAL REPORT 18 vision of its role in creating that future: As the hub of a global NOTES ON FINANCIAL INFORMATION 20 network of individuals and organisations, the Internet Society is an effective advocate for the core values of an open and accessible Internet. Copyright © Internet Society 2007. All rights reserved. FOREWORD FOREWORD BY DANIEL KARRENBERG , CHAIR , BOARD OF TRUSTEES In countless ways, 2006 was sible to engineers worldwide and and its partners worked diligently a turning point, both for ISOC and to make the work of the IETF more to increase Internet education and Ifor the Internet community at large.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) F. Baker, Ed. Request for Comments: 7567 Cisco Systems BCP: 197 G
    Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) F. Baker, Ed. Request for Comments: 7567 Cisco Systems BCP: 197 G. Fairhurst, Ed. Obsoletes: 2309 University of Aberdeen Category: Best Current Practice July 2015 ISSN: 2070-1721 IETF Recommendations Regarding Active Queue Management Abstract This memo presents recommendations to the Internet community concerning measures to improve and preserve Internet performance. It presents a strong recommendation for testing, standardization, and widespread deployment of active queue management (AQM) in network devices to improve the performance of today’s Internet. It also urges a concerted effort of research, measurement, and ultimate deployment of AQM mechanisms to protect the Internet from flows that are not sufficiently responsive to congestion notification. Based on 15 years of experience and new research, this document replaces the recommendations of RFC 2309. Status of This Memo This memo documents an Internet Best Current Practice. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on BCPs is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7567. Baker & Fairhurst Best Current Practice [Page 1] RFC 7567 Active Queue Management Recommendations July 2015 Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust’s Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Download 2008 Annual Review
    the internet society vision internet society annual review 2008 From its inception, the mission of the Internet Society has been to promote the open develop- table of contents ment, evolution, and use of the Internet for the benefit of all people throughout the world. We believe the standards, technologies, business practices, and government and community- foreword daniel karrenberg, chair, board of trustees ............................................1 driven policies connected with the Internet must sustain an open, universally accessible foreword lynn st. amour, president and ceo............................................................2 platform for innovation, creativity, and economic opportunity. In this way, the Internet can improve the quality of life for people in all parts of the world. internet society vision and operating model ................................................3 Join the Internet Society today by visiting http://InternetSociety.org/Join. partnerships and community ......................................................4 strategic initiatives....................................................................10 supporting programmes ............................................................12 for more information ................................................................21 Copyright © Internet Society 2009. All rights reserved. foreword daniel karrenberg, chair, board of trustees Not long ago we witnessed a turning point when the Internet crossed the 1-billion-user threshold. That accomplishment is more
    [Show full text]