DOCSLIB.ORG

A Historical and Comparative Study of Human Rights Violations in Criminal Investigations in Lesotho

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Historical and Comparative Study of Human Rights Violations in Criminal Investigations in Lesotho A Historical and Comparative Study of Human Rights Violations In Criminal Investigations In Lesotho. Thamae Caswell Liphapang Lenka A Historical and Comparative Study of Human Rights Violations In Criminal Investigations In Lesotho By Thamae Caswell Liphapang Lenka Thesis Submitted In Accordance With The Requirements For The Degree of Doctor Legum In The Faculty of Law Department of Procedural Law And Law of Evidence At The University of The Free State November 2010 PROMOTER: PROF. DR. CP VAN DER MERWE FICK i Dedication To my father Letlala (Coming from World War II 1945) and mothers Mankoetla, ‘Matlelaka Lenka, and my own wives, ‘Masekake and ‘Maseapa Lenka, and of course to my own children, ‘Mampiti, Sekake, Mosothoane, Phalo, Majoele and Maletlala/Makoae Lenka who have been supportive throughout the difficult and turbulent times of my life of study from 2005 to 2010. ii Declaration I, the undersigned, hereby declare that the work contained in this study for the degree of Doctor of Laws at the University of the Free State is my own independent work and has not previously been submitted by me at another university. Thamae Caswell Liphapang Lenka iii Acknowledgements I have been a student of Criminal Law for some time now. The subject has naturally given me a special interest in the question of Human Rights violations by the Police through the use of deadly force in effecting arrest in Lesotho. A further quest for study on this topic was increased by my current occupation as a Superintendent of Police and a Senior Police Officer in the Lesotho Mounted Police Service. I humbly wish to extend my heart-felt vote of thanks to my Supervisor, Professor DR. C.P. VAN DER MERWE FICK, the former head of Procedural Law and Law of Evidence in the Faculty of Law, at the University of the Free State. He has rendered me his untiring support and guided supervision in the accomplishment of this daunting task of the thorough examination of the Police use of force in the contemporary world. I devote the entire support to Lesotho Student’s Association for electing me their Secretary General in 2005 which position culminated into my election as a Legal and Constitutional Affairs Secretary for Student Representative Council in 2005/2006 at the University of the Free State and the first Student Court Judge in 2007 and a Sub- Warden for President Steyn Residence from 2007-2009 respectively. A further vote of thanks and appreciation is forwarded to Ms Sandra Viljoen for having meticulously typed the thesis. iv Acronyms ADRD American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man AFCM African Commission on Human Rights AFR African Charter on Human and People’s Rights All ER All English Law Reports AMR American Convention on Human Rights ANC African National Congress AU African Union BAC Basutoland African Congress BCP Basutoland Congress Party BNP Basotho National Party CAT Convention Against Torture CP&E Lesotho Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act DP Democratic Party ECHR European Convention on Human Rights EHRR European Human Rights Report HER Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms HR Human Rights IACM Inter-American Commission on Human Rights IACT Inter-American Court of Human Rights ICCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights ICES International Covenant on Economic, Social & Cultural Rights v ICJ International Court of Human Rights ILO International Labour Organization IPROP International Optional Protocol to ICCPR LCP Lesotho Communist Party LDF Lesotho Defence Force LLJ Lesotho Law Journal LLR Lesotho Law Reports LMPS Lesotho Mounted Police Service MFP Marema Tlou Freedom Party OAS Organization of American States OAU Organization of African Unity PA Police Act PAC Pan-African Congress PACE Police and Criminal Procedure and Evidence PMU Police Mobile Unit RSA Republic of South Africa SADC Southern African Development Community SAJHR South African Journal of Human Rights SALJ South African Law Journal SAPS South African Police Service SARPCCO Southern African Regional Police Chiefs Co-operating Organization UDHR Universal Declaration of Human Rights UK United Kingdom UN United Nations vi UNCH United Nations Charter UNGA United Nations General Assembly USA United States of America vii Lesotho Table of Cases Khaketla v The Prime Minister CIV/APN/187/85. Lebona v DPP CIV/T/40/1995. Letsae v Compol 1982/1984 LLR at 49. Letsie v Commissioner of Police CIV/APN/32/82. Mabope v R 1993/1994 LLR. Mahase v Compol CIV/APN/70/82. Makakole v Commissioner of Police 54/82. Maseko v AG C of A 1990/94 CIV/APN/27/1988. Matete v Minister in Charge of Police CIV/APN/30/82. Modisane v Compol 1980 (1) LLR at 149 at 228. Mokoaleli v Compol 1982/1984 LLR at 84. Mokotso v King CIV/APN/384/187. Molapo v Rex CIV/T/138/66 at 3. Moloi v Compol CIV/APN/203/81-80 (1) LLR 158 at 159. Molupe v Rex 1980 LLR at 112. Monare v Taylor 1967/1976 LLR at 13. Mpiti Sekake v Rex 1971/1973 LLR at 296. Nkholise v Compol CIV/APN/197/80. Nkofo v R 1967/1970 LLR at 383. Petlane v R 1971/73 p. 85 at 91. Phiri v Commander LDF CIV/T/92 LAC 1990/94 at 233. R v Mofelehetsi Moerane 1974/1975 LLR 212 at 251. viii R v Phaloane 1981 (2) LLR at 246. R v Tumelo Sesing CIV/T/20/80/81. Rex v Joubert Soare 1926-53 HCTLR 179-180. Rex v Mphulanyane CIV/T/10/1977. Rex v Peroko Motjokoteli 1926-1953 HCJLR 23 C-F. Rex v Tlali CIV/T127/1974 at 17. Sekhobe Letsie and Nqoana Ntloana Lerotholi v DPP LAC 1990/1994. Sello v Commissioner of Police 1980 (1) LLR at 162 (A). Seshophe v Compol CIV/APN/175/1979 at 170. Tanki v Lebamang Ntisa CIV/T/108/76. Theko v Compol C of A CIV/APN/27/1988 \Court of Appeal 1990-1994 at 13. Tsiu Mosala v R 1974/1975 LLR at 313. ix South African Table of Cases Cooper v Minister of Police 1977 (2) SA 209 (T). Ferreira v Levin 1995 (6) BCLR (CC). Gamble v Minister of Police 1979 (4) SA 759 (A). Gosschalk v Rossouw 1966 (2) SA 476 at 492 (C.P.D.). Govender v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 (4) SCA 273. Government of Republic of South Africa v Basdeo1996 (1) SA 355 (A). Government of RSA v Grootboom 2000 (11) BCLR 1169 (CC). Grootboom v Oostenberg Municipality 2003 (3) BCLR 277 (CC). Johnson v Minister of Home Affairs 1997 (2) SA 432(CC). Key v Attorney General, Cape 1996 (6) BCLR 788 (CC). Mazeka v Minister of Justice 1956 (1) SA 312 (A). Minister of Law and Order v Parker 1989 (2) SA 633 (A). Minister of Police v Ewels 1975 (3) SA 590 (A). Minister of Police v Rabie 1986 (1) SA 117 (A). Minister of Safety and Security v Gaga 2002 SACR 26. Mkhize v Minister of Law and Order 1985 (4) SA at 147 (N). Motlou v Makhubedu 1978 (1) SA 946 (A). Orr v Minister of Law and Order 1985 ECD Unreported. President of Republic of South Africa v Hugo 1997 (6) BCLR at 708 (CC). Raslos v Wilson 1998 (2) SACR 298-306 (N). Rossouw v Sachs 1964 (2) SA 551 (A). x R v Ananias 1963 (3) SA 486 (SR). R v Barlin 1926 AD at 462. R v Becker 1929 AD 167 at 171. R v Britz 1949 (3) SA 576 (A). S v Mnanzana 1966 (3) SA 38 (T). R v Nell 1967 (4) SA 489 (S.W.A.) R v Sibanda 1965 (1) SA 236 (A). R v Zwane 1950 (3) SA 717 (O. P.D). Schermbrucker v Klindt 1965 (4) SA 606 (A) . Ex Parte Matshini 1985 (EPD) Unreported. Sibiya v Swart 1950 (4) SA 515 (A). Siqaba v Minister of Defence Police 1980 (3) SA 800. Stanton v Minister of Justice 1960 (3) SA 353 (T). Superintendent-General of Education of KwaZulu-Natal v Ngubo 1996 (3) BCLR 369 at 3751. S v Barnard 1986 (3) SA 1 (A). S v Christe 1982 (1) SA 464 (A). S v Govender 2004 (2) SACR at 381 (SCA). S v Janeke 1999 (2) SACR 360 S v January;Prokureur-Generaal,Natal v Khumalo 1994 (2) SACR 801(A). S v Mthembu 2008 Jol 21609 (SCA). S v Lebone 1965 (2) SA 837 (A). S v Madiba 1998 (1) BCLR 38. S v Makwanyane 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC). xi S v Melani 1996 (1) SACR 335 (E). S v Mkwanazi 1966 (1) SA 736 (A). S v Motloutsi 1996 (1) SACR 78 (C) . S v Moumbaris 1973 (3) SA 109 (T). S v Mpetha 1982 (2) SA 406- 576 (CPD) at 581. S v Mphala 1998 (4) BCLR at 494 (W). S v Naidoo 1998 (1) BCLR 46. S v Sampson 1989 (3) SA 239 (A). S v Sheehama 1991 (2) SA 860(A). S v Socci 1998 BCLR (3) 376 E. S v Scholtz 1974 (1) SA 124 (W.P.A). S v Swanepoel 1985 (1) SA 293 (A). S v Walters 2000 (4) SA KH 63. S v Williams 1995 (3) SA 632 (CC). S v Yelelo 1981 (1) SA 1002 (A). Tcoeib v S 1996 (7) SACR 627 (NM). Union Government v Thorne 1930 (AD) at 47. Van Heerden v S 1958 (3) SA 150 (T). Wiesner v Molomo 1983 (3) SA 151(A). xii United Kingdom Table of Cases Allen v Metropolitan Police Commissioner (1980) Crim.L.R. the Times March 24 Ballard, Steward-Park, Findlay v MPC (1983) West-Minister County Court Barbara v Home Office (1984) 134 NLJ 888 HC Bentley v Brudsinski (1982) 75 CR.APP.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LS 991203 Mou Between the Government of Lesotho and IPA.Pdf
    Memorandum of Agreement between the Government of Lesotho and the Interim Political Authority (IPA) 3 December 1999 Preamble The Government (meaning the Executive) and the Interim Political Authority (IPA) hereinafter referred to as the contracting parties to this Agreement, Recognizing the Agreements of 2 and 4 October, 1998: Reaffirm their commitment to the rule of law, the promotion of democracy, good governance and human rights in Lesotho; Agree that the pre-eminent need of the hour is for reconciliation, peace, stability and national unity to enable -Lesotho to make the most of the opportunities of the post-apartheid Southern Africa; Further agree that it is of the utmost importance that the preparations for the forthcoming general election are thorough, transparent, fair and free of irregularities in order to make the entire electoral process credible and the eventual result a true reflection of the will of the people of Lesotho. For the achievement of these objectives, the parties have therefore agreed as follows: The Electoral-Model The parties unreservedly accept the award of the Arbitration Tribunal appointed in terms of Section 16 of the Interim Political Authority Act 1998 on the electoral model to be adopted for the forthcoming and subsequent elections. According to the award delivered on 5 October 1999, for the 2000 election only, the mix ratio of constituency seats (FPTP) to Proportional Representation (PR) shall be 80/50. Thereafter the mix ratio of FPTP and PR shall be 50% each of seats in the National Assembly. Timetable for the Next Election The SADC Extended Troika (viz Mozambique, Zimbabwe, South Africa and Botswana) and the Commonwealth will, in consultation with the parties.
    [Show full text]
  • LESOTHO @Torture, Political Killings and Abuses Against Trade Unionists
    £LESOTHO @Torture, political killings and abuses against trade unionists Lesotho, which has been under military rule since 1986, is due to return to civilian government after multi-party elections in October 1992. The constitution which has been drafted for the transition to civilian rule contains a Bill of Rights which guarantees protection of all fundamental human rights. However, Amnesty International remains concerned about the failure of the Lesotho Government to respect human rights in a number of important respects: in particular, its failure to take adequate steps to investigate and prevent a number of cases of torture and alleged extrajudicial execution. Amnesty International is also concerned about the continuing imprisonment of 23 people arrested after the military seizure of power in 1986 who were convicted in trials which apparently did not conform to internationally accepted standards of fairness. In recent months the government has also taken a number of measures against the trade union movement, including the imprisonment of trade union officials and the use of the Internal Security Act to restrict the holding of meetings. Although the introduction of the new Constitution should increase protection of human rights in Lesotho, Amnesty International is calling on the present military government to take prompt action to end these abuses. Political imprisonment, torture and extrajudicial execution have been endemic in Lesotho under successive governments. The advent of a new civilian Constitution and Bill of Rights provides no automatic guarantee that these human rights violations will end. History and constitution Lesotho achieved independence from Britain in 1966. It is an enclave within South Africa, formed in the mid-nineteenth century when King Moshoeshoe I rallied the Basotho nation in a secure mountainous region away from the areas controlled by the Dutch and British settlers.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 22 February 2010
    United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/8/LSO/1 General Assembly Distr.: General 22 February 2010 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Eighth session Geneva, 3–14 May 2010 National report submitted in accordance with paragraph 15 (a) of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 5/1* Lesotho * The present document was not edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.10-11075 A/HRC/WG.6/8/LSO/1 I. Methodology and consultation process 1. The methodology used in compiling this Report is a combination of desk research and stakeholder consultations through a series of workshops. The Human Rights Unit of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights first developed a framework for the compilation of the Report. That was followed by consultative workshop held with all Government Ministries. A National workshop involving all stakeholders was then held to complement and validate the draft Report. II. Background: Normative and institutional framework A. Background (a) Geography 2. Lesotho is located in Southern Africa. It is landlocked and entirely surrounded by the Republic of South Africa. It covers an area of about 30555 square kilometres and has a population of about 1.88 million.1 (b) Political system 3. Lesotho is a constitutional monarchy. It gained independence from Britain on the 4th October, 1966. The King is the Head of State. There are three arms of Government, namely, the Executive, the Legislature and the Judiciary, to ensure checks and balances. The Head of Government is the Prime Minister. 4. Over the years, Lesotho’s democracy has been evolving and at times proved to be fragile.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Biennial Report on the Implementation of the African Growth and Opportunity Act
    2016 BIENNIAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AFRICAN GROWTH AND OPPORTUNITY ACT Prepared by the Office of the United States Trade Representative June 2016 2016 BIENNIAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AFRICAN GROWTH AND OPPORTUNITY ACT Ambassador Michael B.G. Froman Office of the United States Trade Representative June 29, 2016 2016 BIENNIAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AFRICAN GROWTH AND OPPORTUNITY ACT TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword .........................................................................................................................................4 Chapter I. The U.S.-sub-Saharan Africa Trade and Investment Relationships .....................5 Trade and investment overview ...........................................................................................5 Initiatives that enhance the trade and investment relationship ...........................................6 The African Growth and Opportunity Act ...............................................................6 2015 Country Review for Eligibility in 2016 ..........................................................7 AGOA Forum ..........................................................................................................9 Trade Africa/US-EAC Trade and Investment Partnership ......................................9 Trade Africa Expansion ...........................................................................................9 Trade and Investment Framework Agreements (TIFAs) .......................................10 Bilateral Investment
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Inequality in Lesotho: the Right of Succession to Chieftainship
    Gender Inequality in Lesotho: The Right of Succession to Chieftainship by NTHATISI E. METSING Student number: 28312725 Mini‐dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the MPhil: Multidisciplinary Human Rights, the Faculty of Law at the University of Pretoria Supervisor Professor M HANSUNGULE April 2015 DECLARATION I, the undersigned, hereby declare that the work contained in this dissertation is my own original work and has not previously in its entirety or in part been submitted at any other university for a degree. Signature……………………………………………. Date…………………………………… i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to dedicate this paper to my parents, my late father Mr Mokutlane Metsing & my mother Mrs. ‘Mateboho Metsing and all of my family members for their undying support and encouragement. I would like to thank the Almighty God for the strength to complete the paper, a special thank you to my supervisor Prof. M Hansungule for accepting the task of supervising this paper and for his invaluable contribution. I would also like to thank and acknowledge the encouragement from all my friends and colleagues ‐ A sincere thank you to you all and may God’s grace and love abound to you all. ii ABSTRACT Like many other African countries, the system of traditional leadership and chieftainship in Lesotho is strongly embraced and deeply embedded. Under customary law chiefs have been regarded as and served as “governors” of their societies with power over different aspects of life. However the traditional leadership systems have been and continue to be predominantly male. The study therefore will examine the institution of chieftainship in Lesotho under both the Constitution and customary and; how this has led to gender inequality and infringement of international human rights law.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Lesotho Mounted Police Service Performance in Terms of the Southern African Police Chiefs Cooperation Organisation (SARPCCO) Code of Conduct
    THETHE POLICEPOLICE ASAS FRIENDFRIEND ANDAND HHELELPPERER TTOO TTHEHE PEOPEOPPLELE Assessing the Lesotho Mounted Police Service performance in terms of the Southern African Police Chiefs Cooperation Organisation (SARPCCO) Code of Conduct Amanda Dissel, Themba Masuku, Marosa Tshelo and Sean Tait APCOF AFRICAN POLICING CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT FORUM Transformation Resource Centre © 2011 African Policing Civilian Oversight Forum (APCOF) ISBN: 978-1-920355-75-3 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form, or by any means, without the prior permission of the publisher. Published by: African Policing Civilian Oversight Forum 2nd Floor, The Armoury Buchanan Square 160 Sir Lowry Road Woodstock Cape Town South Africa www.apcof.org Layout and printing: COMPRESS.dsl, South Africa | www.compressdsl.com iii Contents Introduction 1 SARPCCO Code of Conduct 2 Methodology for the Study 5 Overview of the Lesotho Mounted Police Service 7 Assessing the LMPS against the SARPCCO Code of Conduct 9 Article 1: Respect for Human Rights 9 Article 2: Non-discrimination 16 Article 3: Use of Force 18 Article 4: Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment 21 Article 5: Protection of Persons in Custody 25 Article 6: Victims of Crime 27 Article 7: Respect for the Rule of Law and Code of Conduct 29 Article 9: Corruption and Abuse of Power 30 Articles 8, 10 & 11: Trustworthiness, Performance of Duties and Professional Conduct 32 Article 12: Confidentiality 37 Article 13: Property Rights 39 Recommendations 41 Conclusion 45 References 47 Annexure A: Indicators, measures and means of verification for articles of the SARPCCO Code of Conduct 50 iv Acknowledgements This report would not have been possible without the assistance of a number of people and organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • LCN Milestones Summary ...Details from Previous Edition
    The NGO Web INSIDE THIS ISSUE About LCN The Lesotho Council of Non-Governmental Organisations (LCN) is an umbrella organizations for NGOs in Lesotho. It was established in May 1990 with an objec- Editorial 2 tive of providing supportive services to the NGO Community. The Council imple- ments this through networking and leadership training and development, information Manpower Woes Lies in its Structural dissemination, capacity building, coordination, advocacy and representation when Setting 3 dealing with the government and the international community. Vision On being Gay and Lesbian 5 An effective and vibrant civil society within a democratic, peaceful and sustainable Lesotho. Do Commissions of Inquiries help our Mission Statement Democracy or just serve the Interest of the To stimulate, promote and build capacity within Lesotho NGOs so that, they are elite few? 7 stable, democratic, transparent, skilled, empowered, sustainable and responsive to their beneficiaries needs and those of the voiceless and marginalized. UN tells Lesotho to establish Human Structure of LCN: Rights Commission 11 The organization is led by a nine-member board of directors. There are officer posi- tions (President, Vice-President, Treasure) and six positions for sectoral representa- tives associated with LCN Commissions. The board of directors and the Commis- Children’s Protection and Welfare Bill 13 sions are supported by a National Secretariat headed by the Executive Director who is also Ex-officio member to the board. LCN Milestones in the years 1997-2000 17 Commissions The membership and sectoral engagement of LCN is clustered into 6 sector com- Public Meetings and Processions Act: missions based on mandates and programmatic orientation of members.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Women's Role in Local Government In
    VOLUME 11 NO 2 93 TRANSFORMING WOMEN’S ROLE IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN LESOTHO THROUGH A WOMEN’S QUOTA Sofonea Shale Sofonea Shale is the Coordinator of Development for Peace Education in Lesotho e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Lesotho introduced a quota for women in local government in 2005 amid different interpretations of the concept and the general preparations for elections. The phase II era of decentralisation, after the quota for women was introduced, was marked by the October 2011 local government elections. In both instances a deliberate effort was made to reserve one-third representation for women, though each time in a different way. This article analyses the way in which the government’s efforts to use a legal framework to challenge traditional and patriarchal tendencies have evolved. It argues that while the introduction of a quota is a good development it was not properly institutionalised in 2005, nor have the changes introduced in 2011 improved the situation. The article argues that insufficient dialogue has led the government and civil society to miss a valuable opportunity to use a women’s quota in local government to change women’s political, social and economic status. INTRODUCTION The post-colonial state in Africa, itself a product of authoritarianism, exploitation and oppression, has been struggling to find a power-sharing formula in polarised and fragmented societies. Although democracy was expected to replace the colonial state as well as oppressive customary and patriarchal rule with a Bill of Rights guaranteeing rights to every citizen, the new dispensation seems to have built upon existing disparities.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Report of the Joint Promotion Mission to the Kingdom of Lesotho
    1 MISSION REPORT OF THE JOINT PROMOTION MISSION TO THE KINGDOM OF LESOTHO By Commissioner Pansy Tlakula & Commissioner Med S.K Kaggwa 3 – 7 September 2012 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the Commission) would like to express its gratitude to the Government of the Kingdom of Lesotho (Lesotho) for authorizing this Promotion Mission, and for putting at the disposal of its delegation all the necessary facilities and personnel to ensure the success of the Mission. The Commission also wishes to thank all the non-governmental organizations (NGOs), independent statutory institutions and other individuals and civil society organizations (CSOs) that found time to meet with its delegation. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover page ………………………………………………………………..........................1 Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………………...2 Acronyms and abbreviations............................................................................................4 Introduction……………………………………………………….....................................5 Terms of Reference of the Mission……………………………………………………...6 Composition of the delegation……………………………………………………...…..7 General Information on Lesotho……………………………………..............................7 Conduct of the Mission ………………………………………………………………….9 Observations and Analysis of the Commission…………………………...………….39 Recommendations……………………………………………………………………….43 4 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ABC : All Basotho Convention Party ACC : Anti-Corruption Commission ACSA : African Correctional Services Association ARV : Anti
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in Botswana, Lesotho, Swaziland and Malawi
    The African e-Journals Project has digitized full text of articles of eleven social science and humanities journals. This item is from the digital archive maintained by Michigan State University Library. Find more at: http://digital.lib.msu.edu/projects/africanjournals/ Available through a partnership with Scroll down to read the article. Human Rights in Botswana, Lesotho, Swaziland and Malawi R. Wiesfelder INTRODUCTION Discussion of human rights patterns within the black- ruled states of Southern Africa generates two kinds of reactions among concerned observers.2 Many individuals presume that almost all African states have a poor record with respect to human rights. This perception leads to insistence that the United States and other western nations demand the same standards from independent black governments that they seek to promote in the white minority-ruled countries. In contrast, other commentators seem offended that human rights issues should even be raised when examining the po- litical situation of impoverished black enclave states which are dependent on South Africa. According to this line of argument, any repression within South Africa's black neighbours is of such a minimal and reactive nature that it does not belong in the same frame of reference as the flagrant crimes of the Pretoria and Salisbury regimes. Beyond the obvious dangers of hypocrisy, they allege that President Carter's concern with human rights viola- tions has weighed most heavily on the least developed countries. 5 Only recipients of economic and security supporting assistance have had their dirty linens aired in American public documents. Moreover, proponents of this perspective point with alarm to the emergence in the United States of an odd alliance of Congressi- onal liberals and conservatives whose preoccupation with a frau- dulent "even-handedness" on human rights matters precludes flexibility, creativity and "progressive commitments" within the Southern African region.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Spaces for LGBTI Activism in Lesotho COUNTRY REPORT Canaries in the Coal Mines an Analysis of Spaces for LGBTI Activism in Lesotho COUNTRY REPORT
    canaries in the coal mines An analysis of spaces for LGBTI activism in Lesotho COUNTRY REPORT canaries in the coal mines An analysis of spaces for LGBTI activism in Lesotho COUNTRY REPORT © The Other Foundation 2017 Postnet Suite 209, Private Bag X31, Saxonwold, 2132, Johannesburg, South Africa www.theotherfoundation.org Follow us on Twitter @OtherFoundation contents Summary ..............................................................................................................2 Rural vs Urban Dimensions............................................................... 23 1 Country Context .......................................................................................4 Traditional Leaders and Community Engagement ............... 23 2 Legislative and Policy Environment ...........................................6 Film Screenings ....................................................................................... 23 Transnational Influence ..........................................................................7 Counselling Services ............................................................................ 24 Religion ...........................................................................................................7 Police Protection ..................................................................................... 24 Legislative and Policy Environment .................................................8 6 Needs and Experiences of LGBTI People ............................. 25 > Criminal Procedure and Evidence
    [Show full text]
  • Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 73 of the Convention Pursuant to the Simplified Reporting Procedure
    United Nations CMW/C/LSO/1 International Convention on the Distr.: General 15 December 2015 Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Original: English English, French and Spanish only Members of Their Families Committee on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 73 of the Convention pursuant to the simplified reporting procedure Initial reports of States parties due in 2007 Lesotho* [Date received: 1 December 2015] * The present document is being issued without formal editing. GE.15-21850(E) *1521850* CMW/C/LSO/1 Part I A. General information 1. Domestic Legal Framework Regarding the Convention (a) Rank of the Convention in Domestic Law 1. In Lesotho, treaties are not invoked directly in domestic courts, that is, they are not self-executing. They have to be domesticated into national laws and administrative regulations in order to be enforced with the exception of International Labour Organization agreements. (b) Description of the national legislation under the Convention regarding the protection of migrant workers and members of their families 2. Although Lesotho has ratified the Convention, there is no comprehensive implementing legislation as yet. A number of various laws enacted before ratification of the Convention and post-ratification, do address issues of migrant workers and members of their families as covered by the Convention. 3. The Constitution of Lesotho, 1993 provides for equal rights between all people without any form of discrimination. Section 4 stipulates that “every person in Lesotho is entitled, whatever his race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status to fundamental human rights and freedoms”.
    [Show full text]