DOCSLIB.ORG

Terminal Evaluation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Terminal Evaluation Report Project Title: Lesotho National Dialogue and Stabilization Project (LNDSP) Terminal Evaluation Report Prepared by: Hindowa B. Momoh PhD, International Consultant November 2020 1 Acknowledgements The consultant wishes to acknowledge with sincere thanks the insights, inputs and contributions provided by key stakeholders met during the course of the assignment. In particular, I would like to thank the UN family particularly UNDP, UN Women, OHCHR, EU, PBF, SADC, Government of Lesotho, CSOs and beneficiaries for their time and ideas shared during the period under review. To the project implementers, the project management unit and the Basotho, I say thank you for your great contributions that helped shaped the outcome of this report. The Senior Management at UNDP and the Project Manager and staff provided priceless support, and freely shared their reports, time and thoughts on the various activities and results of the project. To them, I am indebted. Finally, as an independent Terminal Evaluation, the consultant takes responsibility for the views and opinions expressed in the report, but I hope that they reflect those of all stakeholders interviewed and encountered during the evaluation period. More significantly, it is my considered opinion that the findings and recommendations of this report will contribute to laying a solid foundation for good governance, sustainable peace and stability in Lesotho. Disclaimer This Terminal Evaluation report was prepared by one Independent Consultant: - Hindowa B. Momoh. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of UNDP and partners. 2 Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 2 List of abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 11 1.1. Background and Context ............................................................................................................ 11 1.2. Evaluation Scope and Objectives .............................................................................................. 13 2. Evaluation process and components................................................................................................... 14 2.1. Approach and Methodology ...................................................................................................... 14 2.2. Theory of Change ...................................................................................................................... 15 2.3. Risk Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 17 2.4. Limitations and Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................ 18 2.5. Performance Rating Scale ......................................................................................................... 18 3. Findings .............................................................................................................................................. 20 3.1. What factors explain the project’s performance? ............................................................................. 20 3.1.1. Portfolio coherence ............................................................................................................. 20 3.1.2. Analytical capacity ............................................................................................................. 21 3.1.3. Partnerships and Coordination ............................................................................................ 22 3.1.4. Gender and Human Rights Integration ............................................................................... 23 3.1.5. Selectivity ........................................................................................................................... 24 3.1.6. Leverage.............................................................................................................................. 25 3.1.7. Efficiency ............................................................................................................................ 25 3.2. How well has the project performed? ........................................................................................ 26 3.2.1. Relevance ............................................................................................................................ 26 3.2.2. Effectiveness ....................................................................................................................... 30 3.2.3. Sustainability ...................................................................................................................... 43 4. Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................ 45 5. Lessons Learned ................................................................................................................................. 47 6. Recommendations .............................................................................................................................. 48 Annexes ...................................................................................................................................................... 50 Annex 1: Terms of Reference ................................................................................................................. 50 Annex 2: List of documents reviewed ..................................................................................................... 63 Annex 3: List of persons interviewed ...................................................................................................... 64 Annex 4: Logical framework .................................................................................................................. 70 Annex 5: Data collection tools and instruments ...................................................................................... 71 Annex 6: Details of the evaluation team .................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 3 List of abbreviations AfDB ................................................................................................................................. Africa Development Bank AU ........................................................................................................................................................ African Union BNP ........................................................................................................................................ Basotho National Party BCP .................................................................................................................................. Basutoland Congress Party CCJP .................................................................................................. Catholic in Commission for Justice and Peace CCL ...............................................................................................................................Christian Council of Lesotho CID ........................................................................................................................... Criminal Investigation Division CPC ....................................................................................................................... Community Policing Committees CPD .................................................................................................................................. Country Project Document CSO .................................................................................................................................. Civil Society Organization DCEO ........................................................................................... Directorate of Dispute Prevention and Resolution DIM ......................................................................................................................... Direct Implementation Modality DPE ...................................................................................................................... Development for Peace Education EU ..................................................................................................................................................... European Union FIDA ......................................................................................................................... Federation of Woman Lawyers GNU ........................................................................................................................... Government of National Unity HR ........................................................................................................................................................ Human Rights IEC ...................................................................................................................... Independent Electoral Commission JSC
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LS 991203 Mou Between the Government of Lesotho and IPA.Pdf
    Memorandum of Agreement between the Government of Lesotho and the Interim Political Authority (IPA) 3 December 1999 Preamble The Government (meaning the Executive) and the Interim Political Authority (IPA) hereinafter referred to as the contracting parties to this Agreement, Recognizing the Agreements of 2 and 4 October, 1998: Reaffirm their commitment to the rule of law, the promotion of democracy, good governance and human rights in Lesotho; Agree that the pre-eminent need of the hour is for reconciliation, peace, stability and national unity to enable -Lesotho to make the most of the opportunities of the post-apartheid Southern Africa; Further agree that it is of the utmost importance that the preparations for the forthcoming general election are thorough, transparent, fair and free of irregularities in order to make the entire electoral process credible and the eventual result a true reflection of the will of the people of Lesotho. For the achievement of these objectives, the parties have therefore agreed as follows: The Electoral-Model The parties unreservedly accept the award of the Arbitration Tribunal appointed in terms of Section 16 of the Interim Political Authority Act 1998 on the electoral model to be adopted for the forthcoming and subsequent elections. According to the award delivered on 5 October 1999, for the 2000 election only, the mix ratio of constituency seats (FPTP) to Proportional Representation (PR) shall be 80/50. Thereafter the mix ratio of FPTP and PR shall be 50% each of seats in the National Assembly. Timetable for the Next Election The SADC Extended Troika (viz Mozambique, Zimbabwe, South Africa and Botswana) and the Commonwealth will, in consultation with the parties.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical and Comparative Study of Human Rights Violations in Criminal Investigations in Lesotho
    A Historical and Comparative Study of Human Rights Violations In Criminal Investigations In Lesotho. Thamae Caswell Liphapang Lenka A Historical and Comparative Study of Human Rights Violations In Criminal Investigations In Lesotho By Thamae Caswell Liphapang Lenka Thesis Submitted In Accordance With The Requirements For The Degree of Doctor Legum In The Faculty of Law Department of Procedural Law And Law of Evidence At The University of The Free State November 2010 PROMOTER: PROF. DR. CP VAN DER MERWE FICK i Dedication To my father Letlala (Coming from World War II 1945) and mothers Mankoetla, ‘Matlelaka Lenka, and my own wives, ‘Masekake and ‘Maseapa Lenka, and of course to my own children, ‘Mampiti, Sekake, Mosothoane, Phalo, Majoele and Maletlala/Makoae Lenka who have been supportive throughout the difficult and turbulent times of my life of study from 2005 to 2010. ii Declaration I, the undersigned, hereby declare that the work contained in this study for the degree of Doctor of Laws at the University of the Free State is my own independent work and has not previously been submitted by me at another university. Thamae Caswell Liphapang Lenka iii Acknowledgements I have been a student of Criminal Law for some time now. The subject has naturally given me a special interest in the question of Human Rights violations by the Police through the use of deadly force in effecting arrest in Lesotho. A further quest for study on this topic was increased by my current occupation as a Superintendent of Police and a Senior Police Officer in the Lesotho Mounted Police Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Boundaries: Transboundary Natural Resource Management in Sub-Saharan Africa
    Beyond Boundaries: Transboundary Natural Resource Management in Sub-Saharan Africa 2001 Harry van der Linde Judy Oglethorpe Trevor Sandwith Deborah Snelson Yemeserach Tessema With contributions from Anada Tiéga and Thomas Price Publication Credits Authors: Harry van der Linde, Judy Oglethorpe, Trevor Sandwith, Deborah Snelson and Yemeserach Tessema, with contributions from Anada Tiéga and Thomas Price Publication services: Grammarians, Inc. Publication Manager: Aziz Gökdemir Copyediting/Production Editing: Aziz Gökdemir Proofreading: Grammarians, Inc. Illustrations and Design: Laura Hurst and Steve Hall Maps: WWF-US (1, 2, 4–7); BirdLife International (8); WWF-SARPO (3, 9) Cover Photos: Edward Mendell, Kate Newman, and Harry van der Linde (top, left to right); and John Griffin (bottom) Cover Design: Steve Hall and Chris Henke Desktop publishing: Laura Hurst Printing: S&S Graphics BSP Transboundary Natural Resource Management Project Director: Harry van der Linde BSP Director of Communications: Sheila Donoghue Director of BSP’s Africa & Madagascar Program and BSP Executive Director: Judy Oglethorpe Please cite this publication as: van der Linde, H., J. Oglethorpe, T. Sandwith, D. Snelson, and Y. Tessema (with contributions from Anada Tiéga and Thomas Price). 2001. Beyond Boundaries: Transboundary Natural Resource Management in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, D.C., U.S.A.: Biodiversity Support Program. About the Biodiversity Support Program The Biodiversity Support Program (BSP) is a consortium of World Wildlife Fund, The Nature Conservancy and World Resources Institute, funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). BSP’s mission is to promote conservation of the world’s biological diversity. We believe that a healthy and secure living resource base is essential to meet the needs and aspirations of present and future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Letlhogonolo Mpho Letshele
    COPYRIGHT AND CITATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR THIS THESIS/ DISSERTATION o Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. o NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. o ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. How to cite this thesis Surname, Initial(s). (2012). Title of the thesis or dissertation (Doctoral Thesis / Master’s Dissertation). Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/102000/0002 (Accessed: 22 August 2017). A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE RECURRENCE OF COUPS IN THE KINGDOM OF LESOTHO – 1970-2014 A Dissertation Submitted to the Department of Politics and International Relations of the Faculty of Humanities at the University of Johannesburg by Letlhogonolo Mpho Letshele 201417806 October 2019 In Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN POLITICS AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Johannesburg, South Africa Supervisor: Prof Annie Barbara Chikwanha Co-Supervisor: Prof Chris Landsberg 1 ABSTRACT Since its independence, the Kingdom of Lesotho has experienced the recurrence of coups (1970-2014). A process of re-democratisation was attempted in the country in 1993 but another coup succeeded the elections. The next elections in 1998 were marked by the worst political violence in the history of Lesotho. Electoral reforms were then introduced in 2002. Still, the reforms did not prevent the coup attempt in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • LESOTHO @Torture, Political Killings and Abuses Against Trade Unionists
    £LESOTHO @Torture, political killings and abuses against trade unionists Lesotho, which has been under military rule since 1986, is due to return to civilian government after multi-party elections in October 1992. The constitution which has been drafted for the transition to civilian rule contains a Bill of Rights which guarantees protection of all fundamental human rights. However, Amnesty International remains concerned about the failure of the Lesotho Government to respect human rights in a number of important respects: in particular, its failure to take adequate steps to investigate and prevent a number of cases of torture and alleged extrajudicial execution. Amnesty International is also concerned about the continuing imprisonment of 23 people arrested after the military seizure of power in 1986 who were convicted in trials which apparently did not conform to internationally accepted standards of fairness. In recent months the government has also taken a number of measures against the trade union movement, including the imprisonment of trade union officials and the use of the Internal Security Act to restrict the holding of meetings. Although the introduction of the new Constitution should increase protection of human rights in Lesotho, Amnesty International is calling on the present military government to take prompt action to end these abuses. Political imprisonment, torture and extrajudicial execution have been endemic in Lesotho under successive governments. The advent of a new civilian Constitution and Bill of Rights provides no automatic guarantee that these human rights violations will end. History and constitution Lesotho achieved independence from Britain in 1966. It is an enclave within South Africa, formed in the mid-nineteenth century when King Moshoeshoe I rallied the Basotho nation in a secure mountainous region away from the areas controlled by the Dutch and British settlers.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 22 February 2010
    United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/8/LSO/1 General Assembly Distr.: General 22 February 2010 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Eighth session Geneva, 3–14 May 2010 National report submitted in accordance with paragraph 15 (a) of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 5/1* Lesotho * The present document was not edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.10-11075 A/HRC/WG.6/8/LSO/1 I. Methodology and consultation process 1. The methodology used in compiling this Report is a combination of desk research and stakeholder consultations through a series of workshops. The Human Rights Unit of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights first developed a framework for the compilation of the Report. That was followed by consultative workshop held with all Government Ministries. A National workshop involving all stakeholders was then held to complement and validate the draft Report. II. Background: Normative and institutional framework A. Background (a) Geography 2. Lesotho is located in Southern Africa. It is landlocked and entirely surrounded by the Republic of South Africa. It covers an area of about 30555 square kilometres and has a population of about 1.88 million.1 (b) Political system 3. Lesotho is a constitutional monarchy. It gained independence from Britain on the 4th October, 1966. The King is the Head of State. There are three arms of Government, namely, the Executive, the Legislature and the Judiciary, to ensure checks and balances. The Head of Government is the Prime Minister. 4. Over the years, Lesotho’s democracy has been evolving and at times proved to be fragile.
    [Show full text]
  • TBNRM Lessons, Conclusions and Future Needs TBNRM Lessons, Conclusions and Future Needs
    4 TBNRM Lessons, Conclusions and Future Needs TBNRM Lessons, Conclusions and Future Needs This chapter presents summary lessons and conclusions from the project analysis. It then outlines gaps in current understanding of TBNRM, and lists future priority needs to enhance natural resource management effectiveness in a transboundary context. The content of the chapter has been drawn from regional reviews, case studies, the pan-African workshop, comments from collaborators and other sources. How to Use This Chapter People considering a new transboundary initiative should find the lessons and conclusions in Section 4.1 particularly useful. People already involved in TBNRM may want to skim the headings of the lessons and conclusions in Section 4.1 and pick those most useful to them. Section 4.2 outlining gaps and future needs should be relevant; people already involved should be able to advance some of these ideas and address needs. 104 • Beyond Boundaries: Transboundary Natural Resource Management in Sub-Saharan Africa 4.1 Lessons and Conclusions from the Analysis 4.1.1 General and Ecological Aspects TBNRM Can Be an Effective Approach—Under the Right Conditions TBNRM can be an effective approach for natural resource management and biodiversity conservation, where shared threats can be tackled jointly and/or mutual benefits can be gained collaboratively. Key to success is the existence of a win-win situation for major stakeholders in each country involved, when potential benefits outweigh costs. TBNRM can work in a variety of situations, including conservation of threatened species or resources; sound use of limited resources such as water, rangeland, wildlife and forests; and ecosystem management.
    [Show full text]
  • ICT Policy and Regulation)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Wits Institutional Repository on DSPACE Name of Degree Masters of Arts (ICT Policy and Regulation) Research Report Regional economic communities influencing Policy: A study Research Title of information communications technology policy (on telecommunication) of four SADC countries. Name & Surname Godfree W Maulana Student Number 515586 Supervisor Dr Kiru Pillay 1 of 127 DECLARATION I Godfree W Maulana, as a registered student for Masters of Arts (ICT Policy & Regulations) for the 2015. I declare the following: Confirmation that this research report is my own work notwithstanding the fact that reference to the other available papers or work relevant to the topic in question was made by me. I further wish to confirm that I am aware of the APA method of referencing as recommended by the University. I am also aware of the University rules and penalties relating to plagiarism. Signature: Date: 09/03/2017 Masters of Arts (ICT Policy & Regulation) Student #: 515586 2 of 127 ABSTRACT In the last three decades’ information and communication technology (ICT) has been a catalyst for an unprecedented social and economic revolution. In part, the revolution can be accredited to the rapid change in technology over the years, while on the other hand it can be attributed to reform changes which include, but are not limited to, the liberalisation of the sector. Countries introduced reforms in the ICT sector via targeted policy changes which facilitated change in the sector. They either formulated policies with the objective to remedy specific issues in their environment or adopted policies guided by the regional bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Biennial Report on the Implementation of the African Growth and Opportunity Act
    2016 BIENNIAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AFRICAN GROWTH AND OPPORTUNITY ACT Prepared by the Office of the United States Trade Representative June 2016 2016 BIENNIAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AFRICAN GROWTH AND OPPORTUNITY ACT Ambassador Michael B.G. Froman Office of the United States Trade Representative June 29, 2016 2016 BIENNIAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AFRICAN GROWTH AND OPPORTUNITY ACT TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword .........................................................................................................................................4 Chapter I. The U.S.-sub-Saharan Africa Trade and Investment Relationships .....................5 Trade and investment overview ...........................................................................................5 Initiatives that enhance the trade and investment relationship ...........................................6 The African Growth and Opportunity Act ...............................................................6 2015 Country Review for Eligibility in 2016 ..........................................................7 AGOA Forum ..........................................................................................................9 Trade Africa/US-EAC Trade and Investment Partnership ......................................9 Trade Africa Expansion ...........................................................................................9 Trade and Investment Framework Agreements (TIFAs) .......................................10 Bilateral Investment
    [Show full text]
  • Towards an Explanation of the Recurrence of Military Coups in Lesotho
    ASPJ Africa & Francophonie - 3rd Quarter 2017 Towards an Explanation of the Recurrence of Military Coups in Lesotho EVERISTO BENYERA, PHD* esotho’s history is littered with military coups, with the latest one—with questionable authenticity—complicating the already complicated role of the military in the South African country’s politics. This article un- packs what it terms a dangerous mix in Lesotho’s politics which pits the military against the monarch.1 This will be achieved by first exploring the history of monarch–military relations using the coloniality of power as the theoretical L 2 framework. This relationship is here cast as one of legitimisation, delegitimisa- tion, and relegitimisation.3 Some authors characterise the relationship as perpetu- ally antagonistic and maintain that it was never meant to work.4 Accordingly, the two institutions tend to have a love–hate relationship, at times opposing each other while also reinforcing one another on another level. In this relationship, tensions occur when the military delegitimises the monarch and the state, leading in turn to the monarchy seeking to relegitimise itself. The extent of these tensions is expressed—among other things—through the various military coup d’états that have rocked the kingdom in the clouds for decades. In Lesotho, the latest version of military coups occurred on 1 September 2014 and was the sixth successful coup in the country since 1970. Unlike other coups before it, this one was very different because it was disputed by many, in- cluding Lesotho’s powerful and influential only neighbour, South Africa, and the *Dr Everisto Benyera is a senior lecturer in the Department of Political Sciences at the University of South Africa in Pretoria, South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Inequality in Lesotho: the Right of Succession to Chieftainship
    Gender Inequality in Lesotho: The Right of Succession to Chieftainship by NTHATISI E. METSING Student number: 28312725 Mini‐dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the MPhil: Multidisciplinary Human Rights, the Faculty of Law at the University of Pretoria Supervisor Professor M HANSUNGULE April 2015 DECLARATION I, the undersigned, hereby declare that the work contained in this dissertation is my own original work and has not previously in its entirety or in part been submitted at any other university for a degree. Signature……………………………………………. Date…………………………………… i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to dedicate this paper to my parents, my late father Mr Mokutlane Metsing & my mother Mrs. ‘Mateboho Metsing and all of my family members for their undying support and encouragement. I would like to thank the Almighty God for the strength to complete the paper, a special thank you to my supervisor Prof. M Hansungule for accepting the task of supervising this paper and for his invaluable contribution. I would also like to thank and acknowledge the encouragement from all my friends and colleagues ‐ A sincere thank you to you all and may God’s grace and love abound to you all. ii ABSTRACT Like many other African countries, the system of traditional leadership and chieftainship in Lesotho is strongly embraced and deeply embedded. Under customary law chiefs have been regarded as and served as “governors” of their societies with power over different aspects of life. However the traditional leadership systems have been and continue to be predominantly male. The study therefore will examine the institution of chieftainship in Lesotho under both the Constitution and customary and; how this has led to gender inequality and infringement of international human rights law.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Lesotho Mounted Police Service Performance in Terms of the Southern African Police Chiefs Cooperation Organisation (SARPCCO) Code of Conduct
    THETHE POLICEPOLICE ASAS FRIENDFRIEND ANDAND HHELELPPERER TTOO TTHEHE PEOPEOPPLELE Assessing the Lesotho Mounted Police Service performance in terms of the Southern African Police Chiefs Cooperation Organisation (SARPCCO) Code of Conduct Amanda Dissel, Themba Masuku, Marosa Tshelo and Sean Tait APCOF AFRICAN POLICING CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT FORUM Transformation Resource Centre © 2011 African Policing Civilian Oversight Forum (APCOF) ISBN: 978-1-920355-75-3 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form, or by any means, without the prior permission of the publisher. Published by: African Policing Civilian Oversight Forum 2nd Floor, The Armoury Buchanan Square 160 Sir Lowry Road Woodstock Cape Town South Africa www.apcof.org Layout and printing: COMPRESS.dsl, South Africa | www.compressdsl.com iii Contents Introduction 1 SARPCCO Code of Conduct 2 Methodology for the Study 5 Overview of the Lesotho Mounted Police Service 7 Assessing the LMPS against the SARPCCO Code of Conduct 9 Article 1: Respect for Human Rights 9 Article 2: Non-discrimination 16 Article 3: Use of Force 18 Article 4: Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment 21 Article 5: Protection of Persons in Custody 25 Article 6: Victims of Crime 27 Article 7: Respect for the Rule of Law and Code of Conduct 29 Article 9: Corruption and Abuse of Power 30 Articles 8, 10 & 11: Trustworthiness, Performance of Duties and Professional Conduct 32 Article 12: Confidentiality 37 Article 13: Property Rights 39 Recommendations 41 Conclusion 45 References 47 Annexure A: Indicators, measures and means of verification for articles of the SARPCCO Code of Conduct 50 iv Acknowledgements This report would not have been possible without the assistance of a number of people and organisations.
    [Show full text]