DOCSLIB.ORG

Waituna Biodiversity Options and Opportunities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Waituna Biodiversity Options and Opportunities Waituna Biodiversity Options and Opportunities The attached draft biodiversity report was produced by an external consultant to aid the people and agencies in thinking about what actions may help improve the state of biodiversity across the catchment. It is a resource and not a prescription. The views in the report are not necessarily those held by the partner organisations or the Whakamana te Waituna trust itself. The report builds on previous work. The Whakamana te Waituna programme partners wish to provide this report to the community, appropriate agencies and stakeholders for their comments, feedback and input into developing a practical and achievable series of actions. To do this we will engage with the community, through a series of workshops (dates to be confirmed), focusing specifically on what might be done to help improve biodiversity. This commentary is provided as a supplement to the report to summarise, and provide input from the partner organisations, on the actions that might work. Ideas: Biodiversity Management area 1: Waituna lagoon and adjacent wetland habitats, Pg. 36-44. 1. Fencing to exclude stock from wetlands and lagoon shore: it is thought that currently there is already sufficient fencing to exclude stock from the Waituna Lagoon and adjacent wetlands. However, this could be investigated, and any deficiencies rectified if necessary. 2. Prevention of regime shift: These recommendations are based on the Strategy and Action Plan for Waituna. Partner organisations believe this is best dealt with under the contaminant intervention and landward buffer work streams. 3. Pest plant and animal control: Eradication of feral ungulates is already prioritised by the Department of Conservation’s Arawai Kakariki wetland restoration program and will continue. Further recommendations aim to implement possum control and extend mustelid control around the northern margin of Waituna lagoon. An aim of eradication is recommended for pest plant species including grey willow, Spanish heath and gorse. Currently the Department of Conservation strategically targets gorse, manages Spanish heath and grey willow is controlled for eradication on public conservation land. 4. Threatened plant monitoring: Recommendations include identifying, mapping and undertaking baseline monitoring of threatened plant species populations. 5. Migratory fish: The report recommends taking the needs of migratory fish populations into lagoon openings. This should be considered in future lagoon opening consent processes, and information could be sought on the impact of lagoon openings on migratory fish populations. Ideas: Biodiversity Management area 2: Dryland forest remnants indigenous shrublands and wetlands. Pg. 44-49 1. Fencing wetland remnants: while most areas would fall on private land, other areas such as the Waituna Scenic Reserve may benefit from upgrading of fencing 1 2. Pest control in areas with high lizard values: recommendations include working with a consultant to identify these areas. 3. Pest animal control in all remaining sites: report recommends control of possum, mustelid and rats in a co-ordinated manner 4. Pest plant control: recommendations include management of Chilean flame creeper, however, there is no fully effective herbicide method. Education could be provided to landowners to identify and manage. 5. Fencing forest remnants: identify, map, explore mechanisms/funding for fencing 6. Create ecological linkages: encouragement of retirement of marginal land by land owners, combined with investigations into potential funding for return to indigenous vegetation 7. Lizard monitoring: recommendations include monitoring lizards to provide a baseline population estimate 8. Legal protection of privately owned remnants: this idea is to engage with landowners to encourage legal protection of privately owned remnants. It is stressed that the Whakamana te Waituna programme will not, and cannot, enforce legal protection of private land. However, advice and information could be provided for those private landowners who wish to do so. Idea: Biodiversity Management area 3: All riparian margins, watercourses and drains, Pg. 49-61 1. Fencing to exclude domestic stock from riparian margins: This idea seeks fencing of all waterways including a 15m setback on main stream channels and a 5m set back on tributaries. Such setbacks, at this stage maybe unfeasible for many landowners, but encouragement and information should be provided on the environmental benefits of wider riparian buffers. The Whakamana te Waituna programme could look at providing assistance and support to landowners who wish to maintain riparian buffers at widths over and above regulation. 2. Restoration planting of waterways: funding mechanisms could be explored, and potential support could be available for those wanting to undertake maintenance of riparian margins over and above regulation 3. Pest plant and animal control: investigate pest control along riparian zones including ungulates, mustelids, rodents, feral cats, possums 4. Restore ecological functions of streams: potential to restore instream features, install artificial instream habitat structures, removal of hard engineering approaches, overhanging vegetation etc 5. Improve instream habitat management: Reshaping of banks, instream structures, improving variety of substrate, and allowing some instream vegetation to remain – while maintaining drainage capability 6. Restore hydrological function of stream and wetlands: Restoration of hydrological connectivity such as reconnection of meanders and back waters, where practical and installation of sediment traps 7. Reduce the impacts of drains on catchment hydrology: including working with landowners to explore alternative management regimes – such as flow control structures and retention ponds 8. Secure populations of Gollum Galaxias in Carrans Creek: recommendations include surveys to identify where populations of this unique, declining native fish are located, and exploring options for management 2 Ideas: Biodiversity Management area 4: Private agricultural areas (not already included in areas 1- 3), Pg. 61-65 1. Fencing wetlands: aim to support the fence all remaining wetlands by identifying, mapping and exploring funding options 2. Restoring buffer adjacent to Waituna Lagoon: this is a recommendation provided by the consultant which is consistent with the Strategy and Action Plan for Waituna (Action 4) 3. Control of pest animal species: including possums, mustelids and rats 4. Control of pest plants: explore mechanisms and funding for pest plant removal 5. Legal protection of privately owned sites: while this idea seeks to legally protect all indigenous fragments it is noted that the Whakamana te Waituna programme will not, and cannot, enforce legal protection of private land. However, advice and information could be provided for those private landowners who wish to do so, using connections with other agencies such as QE2 Trust. Prioritisation between biodiversity management areas (Pg. 66-68): The following sites are identified as the highest priority sites within the biodiversity management areas: • Waituna Lagoon • Waituna Creek • Wetlands in biodiversity management area 2 and 4 • Craws Creek The following sites were identified as moderate priority: • Carrans Creek • Moffat Creek • Smaller more isolated lowland forest fragments in biodiversity management areas 2 and 4 Next steps It is important to note that the above summarised ideas are just that. The number of recommendations clearly far exceed what we could feasibly carry out quickly. So, as a community we need to decide what should be carried out under the biodiversity work stream. To do this we would like to engage in a discussion with the community and key stakeholders. We want to know what you think of the recommendations of the report, if you agree with how actions have been prioritised, what recommendations are most important to you, and if you have any other suggestions. If you would like to attend the workshop to help inform the biodiversity workstream, or if you do not wish to attend the workshop but have feedback, please get in touch. Please email [email protected] to register for the first workshop, or to supply your written comments. Workshop dates are to be confirmed. 3 DRAFT WHAKAMANA TE WAITUNA BIODIVERSITY OPTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES R4701 DRAFT WHAKAMANA TE WAITUNA BIODIVERSITY OPTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES Wire rush rushland amongst mānuka shrubland, near Waituna Lagoon Road. Contract Report No. 4701 May 2019 Project Team: Kelvin Lloyd - Project management Nick Goldwater - Report author Carey Knox - Report author Helen McCaughan - Report author Steve Rate - Report author Fiona Wilcox - Report author Prepared for: Whakamana te Waituna Charitable Trust DUNEDIN OFFICE: 764 CUMBERLAND STREET, DUNEDIN 9016 Ph 03-477-2096, 03-477-2095 HEAD OFFICE: 99 SALA STREET, P.O. BOX 7137, TE NGAE, ROTORUA Ph 07-343-9017; Fax 07-343-9018, email [email protected], www.wildlands.co.nz DRAFT DRAFT CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. PROJECT OBJECTIVE 3 3. PROJECT SCOPE 3 4. METHODS 3 5. CULTURAL CONTEXT 4 6. ECOLOGICAL CONTEXT 5 6.1 Waituna Ecological District 5 6.2 Waterways 5 6.3 Protected Natural Areas 8 6.4 Unprotected natural areas 9 6.5 Threatened land environments 9 6.6 Vegetation and habitats 11 6.7 Overview 11 6.8 Wetland vegetation 11 6.9 Terrestrial vegetation 13 6.10 Other vegetation/habitat types 13 6.11 Naturally uncommon ecosystem types 16 7. FLORA 17 7.1 Indigenous species 17 8. FAUNA 19 8.1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Origin of the Bifurcating Style in Asteraceae (Compositae)
    Annals of Botany 117: 1009–1021, 2016 doi:10.1093/aob/mcw033, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org The origin of the bifurcating style in Asteraceae (Compositae) Liliana Katinas1,2,*, Marcelo P. Hernandez 2, Ana M. Arambarri2 and Vicki A. Funk3 1Division Plantas Vasculares, Museo de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina, 2Laboratorio de Morfologıa Comparada de Espermatofitas (LAMCE), Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina and 3Department of Botany, NMNH, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C., USA *For correspondence. E-mail [email protected] Received: 20 November 2015 Returned for revision: 22 December 2015 Accepted: 8 January 2016 Published electronically: 20 April 2016 Background and Aims The plant family Asteraceae (Compositae) exhibits remarkable morphological variation in the styles of its members. Lack of studies on the styles of the sister families to Asteraceae, Goodeniaceae and Calyceraceae, obscures our understanding of the origin and evolution of this reproductive feature in these groups. The aim of this work was to perform a comparative study of style morphology and to discuss the relevance of im- portant features in the evolution of Asteraceae and its sister families. Methods The histochemistry, venation and general morphology of the styles of members of Goodeniaceae, Calyceraceae and early branching lineages of Asteraceae were analysed and put in a phylogenetic framework to dis- cuss the relevance of style features in the evolution of these families. Key Results The location of lipophilic substances allowed differentiation of receptive from non-receptive style papillae, and the style venation in Goodeniaceae and Calyceraceae proved to be distinctive.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Walks in the Invercargill Area Invercargill the in Walks Short Conditions of Use of Conditions
    W: E: www.icc.govt.nz [email protected] F: P: +64 3 217 5358 217 3 +64 9070 219 3 +64 Queens Park, Invercargill, New Zealand New Invercargill, Park, Queens Makarewa Office Parks Council City Invercargill For further information contact: information further For Lorneville Lorneville - Dacre Rd North Rd contents of this brochure. All material is subject to copyright. copyright. to subject is material All brochure. this of contents Web: www.es.govt.nz Web: for loss, cost or damage whatsoever arising out of or connected with the the with connected or of out arising whatsoever damage or cost loss, for 8 Email: [email protected] Email: responsibility for any error or omission and disclaim liability to any entity entity any to liability disclaim and omission or error any for responsibility West Plains Rd 9 McIvor Rd 5115 211 03 Ph: the agencies involved in the management of these walking tracks accept no no accept tracks walking these of management the in involved agencies the Waikiwi 9840 Invercargill While all due care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this publication, publication, this of accuracy the ensure to taken been has care due all While Waihopai Bainfield Rd 90116 Bag Private Disclaimer Grasmere Southland Environment 7 10 Rosedale Waverley www.doc.govt.nz Web: Web: www.southerndhb.govt.nz Web: Bay Rd Herbert St Findlay Rd [email protected] Email: Email: [email protected] Email: Avenal Windsor Ph: 03 211 2400 211 03 Ph: Ph: 03 211 0900 211 03 Ph: Queens Dr Glengarry Tay St Invercargill 9840 Invercargill
    [Show full text]
  • Flora Surveys Introduction Survey Method Results
    Hamish Saunders Memorial Island Survey Program 2009 45 Flora Surveys The most studied island is Sarah Results Island. This island has had several Introduction plans developed that have A total of 122 vascular flora included flora surveys but have species from 56 families were There have been few flora focused on the historical value of recorded across the islands surveys undertaken in the the island. The NVA holds some surveyed. The species are Macquarie Harbour area. Data on observations but the species list comprised of 50 higher plants the Natural Values Atlas (NVA) is not as comprehensive as that (7 monocots and 44 dicots) shows that observations for given in the plans. The Sarah and 13 lower plants. Of the this area are sourced from the Island Visitor Services Site Plan species recorded 14 are endemic Herbarium, projects undertaken (2006) cites a survey undertaken to Australia; 1 occurs only in by DPIPWE (or its predecessors) by Walsh (1992). The species Tasmania. Eighteen species are such as the Huon Pine Survey recorded for Sarah Island have considered to be primitive. There and the Millennium Seed Bank been added to some of the tables were 24 introduced species found Collection project. Other data in this report. with 9 of these being listed weeds. has been added to the NVA as One orchid species was found part of composite data sets such Survey Method that was not known to occur in as Tasforhab and wetforest data the south west of the state and the sources of which are not Botanical surveys were this discovery has considerably easily traceable.
    [Show full text]
  • World Conference on Ecological Restoration
    THE WORLD CONFERENCE ON ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION CONFERENCE ABSTRACT ORGANIZERS Conference Secretariat Conference Scientific Secretariat di&co Pyrenean Institute of Ecology-CSIC. Paseo de Sagasta, 19. Entlo dcha Avd. Montañana, 1005, Apdo. 202 50008 Zaragoza. Spain 50. 080 - Zaragoza. Spain Phone Number: +34 976 211 748, http://www.ipe.csic.es Fax +34 976 212 959) [email protected] Chairperson: Prof. Francisco A. Comín, [email protected] Coordinator: Dr. Mercedes García, [email protected] Society for Ecological Restoration International http://www.ser.org 285 W. 18th St., #1, Tucson, AZ 85701, Ph nº: 520-622-5485, F:520-622-5491 Chair Keith Bowers, [email protected] Treasurer Suzanne Tuttle, [email protected] Steve Patterson, [email protected] Southeast us representative Secretary David Borland, [email protected] Karen rodríguez, [email protected] Western us representative Asia/pacific representative Cindy Roessler, [email protected] Kingsley Dixon, [email protected] Representative-at-large Euro-mediterranean representative George Gann, [email protected] Jim Harris, [email protected] Representative-at-large Latin america/caribbean representative Bill Halvorson, [email protected] Carolina Murcia, [email protected] Representative-at-large Midwest us representative Lucinda Jackson, [email protected] Bonnie Harper-Lore, Bonnie.Harper- Representative-at-large [email protected] Rudy van Diggelen, [email protected] Northeast us/canada representative Representative-at-large John Munro, [email protected] Al Unwin - Niagara Collage, Northwest us representative [email protected] Steve Moddemeyer, [email protected] Representative-at-large Rocky mt./great plains representative Steve Whisenant, [email protected] Executive director: Mary Kay C.
    [Show full text]
  • Surf's Up! Oil Spill Exercise in Awarua
    From left New Zealand Aluminium Smelters Limited January to March 2015 Surf’s up! Fonterra (blue) vs NZAS (red) at Oreti Beach It was a sea of red and blue t-shirts as nearly 450 NZAS see people exercising with family and friends, and most and Fonterra employees and their families participated importantly having fun on a beautiful autumn day. in this year’s annual Surf to City event. Nearly three and a half thousand Southlanders went for it either Everyone thoroughly deserved the delicious sausage sizzle running, cycling or walking the 12 km, 6 km or 2.5 km served up by the Waikiwi Lions Club when they crossed the courses. The weather was perfect with beautiful blue finish line. This gave people the opportunity to socialise and skies and a gentle breeze – couldn’t have been any relax in the sun. A wonderful day out. better. Next year let’s make sure the sea of red swamps the blue! NZAS challenged Fonterra, to see who could get the highest number of available employees to participate – The photo above is courtesy of David Russell from Southern Exposures – check out his website for other photos nothing like a little inter-industry rivalry. Congratulations to www.southernexposures.co.nz. Fonterra who were the clear winners of the challenge. However, it wasn’t all about the numbers, it was great to Other Surf to City pictures taken by HR can be found on the last page of this newsletter. Oil spill exercise in Awarua Bay Around twenty people participated in an oil spill exercise in Awarua Bay recently, including Murray Wood, John Fallow and Ray Winter from Shipping Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of Pyrmont Peninsula 1788 - 2008
    Transformations: Ecology of Pyrmont peninsula 1788 - 2008 John Broadbent Transformations: Ecology of Pyrmont peninsula 1788 - 2008 John Broadbent Sydney, 2010. Ecology of Pyrmont peninsula iii Executive summary City Council’s ‘Sustainable Sydney 2030’ initiative ‘is a vision for the sustainable development of the City for the next 20 years and beyond’. It has a largely anthropocentric basis, that is ‘viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and values’(Macquarie Dictionary, 2005). The perspective taken here is that Council’s initiative, vital though it is, should be underpinned by an ecocentric ethic to succeed. This latter was defined by Aldo Leopold in 1949, 60 years ago, as ‘a philosophy that recognizes[sic] that the ecosphere, rather than any individual organism[notably humans] is the source and support of all life and as such advises a holistic and eco-centric approach to government, industry, and individual’(http://dictionary.babylon.com). Some relevant considerations are set out in Part 1: General Introduction. In this report, Pyrmont peninsula - that is the communities of Pyrmont and Ultimo – is considered as a microcosm of the City of Sydney, indeed of urban areas globally. An extensive series of early views of the peninsula are presented to help the reader better visualise this place as it was early in European settlement (Part 2: Early views of Pyrmont peninsula). The physical geography of Pyrmont peninsula has been transformed since European settlement, and Part 3: Physical geography of Pyrmont peninsula describes the geology, soils, topography, shoreline and drainage as they would most likely have appeared to the first Europeans to set foot there.
    [Show full text]
  • Selliera Radicans
    Selliera radicans COMMON NAME Selliera, remuremu, half-star, bonking grass FAMILY Goodeniaceae AUTHORITY Selliera radicans Cav. FLORA CATEGORY Vascular – Native ENDEMIC TAXON Yes ENDEMIC GENUS No ENDEMIC FAMILY No Coromandel, December. Photographer: John Smith-Dodsworth STRUCTURAL CLASS Herbs - Dicotyledons other than Composites NVS CODE SELRAD CHROMOSOME NUMBER 2n = 16 CURRENT CONSERVATION STATUS 2012 | Not Threatened PREVIOUS CONSERVATION STATUSES 2009 | Not Threatened 2004 | Not Threatened DISTRIBUTION Endemic. New Zealand: Three Kings, North, South, Stewart and Chatham Islands. HABITAT Coastal to alpine. In permanently to seasonally damp, open sites and depressions such as in sand swales, on cliff tops and on talus slopes below these, in coastal turf, in the marginal turf of lake and ponds, in salt Fruit. Makara Estuary, Wellington. Mar 2008. pans. Mostly coastal but also recorded from well inland in the South Photographer: Jeremy Rolfe Island and parts of the Central North Island (such as along the shores of Lake Taupo) FEATURES Perennial, ± succulent creeping herb forming matted patches up to 1 m or more in diameter. Stems and branches, 1-4 mm diameter, white or yellowish, procumbent (rarely with tips ascendant) held near at or just below substrate surface, widely spreading, rooting at nodes yellowish. Leaves, 1-4 borne in a fascicles along stem, alternate, appressed to ground or ascending, coriaceous, (± succulent (fleshy)), dark green to yellow-green, glabrous, glossy; petioles 4-40 mm long, slender flattened; lamina 3-50 × 1-10 mm, very variable ranging from orbicular, rhomboid through narrowly spathulate, obovate-spathulate, linear-spathulate to linear, base attenuate to truncate, apex obtuse, subacute to acute.
    [Show full text]
  • Employing Hypothesis Testing and Data from Multiple Genomic Compartments to Resolve Recalcitrant Backbone Nodes in Goodenia S.L. T (Goodeniaceae) ⁎ Rachel S
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 127 (2018) 502–512 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Employing hypothesis testing and data from multiple genomic compartments to resolve recalcitrant backbone nodes in Goodenia s.l. T (Goodeniaceae) ⁎ Rachel S. Jabailya,b, , Kelly A. Shepherdc, Pryce S. Michenerb, Caroline J. Bushb, Rodrigo Riverod,e, Andrew G. Gardnerf, Emily B. Sessad,g a Department of Organismal Biology & Ecology, Colorado College, Colorado Springs, CO 80903, USA b Department of Biology, Rhodes College, Memphis, TN 38112, USA c Western Australian Herbarium, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, WA 6151, Australia d Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA e Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, University of Hawaii– Mānoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA f Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Stanislaus, One University Circle, Turlock, CA 95382, USA g Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Goodeniaceae is a primarily Australian flowering plant family with a complex taxonomy and evolutionary Chloroplast genome history. Previous phylogenetic analyses have successfully resolved the backbone topology of the largest clade in Conserved ortholog set (COS) the family, Goodenia s.l., but have failed to clarify relationships within the species-rich and enigmatic Goodenia Genome skimming clade C, a prerequisite for taxonomic revision of the group. We used genome skimming to retrieve sequences for Goodeniaceae chloroplast, mitochondrial, and nuclear markers for 24 taxa representing Goodenia s.l., with a particular focus on Mitochondrial genome Goodenia clade C. We performed extensive hypothesis tests to explore incongruence in clade C and evaluate Phylogeny Rapid radiation statistical support for clades within this group, using datasets from all three genomic compartments.
    [Show full text]
  • Southland Conservancy
    A Directory of Wetlands in New Zealand SOUTHLAND CONSERVANCY Te Anau Basin Wetland Complex (71) Location: 45o27'S, 167o46'E. To the east and southeast of Lake Te Anau, Southland, South Island. Area: c.2,400 ha. Altitude: 180-360 m. Overview: The Te Anau Basin Wetland Complex consists of seven distinct and isolated wetlands within the Te Anau Basin. These sites are the Dome Mire and Dismal Swamp area, Kepler Mire, Amoeboid Mire, Kakapo Swamp, Dunton Bog and two areas within the Snowdon Forest. The Dome Mire and Dismal Swamp area and Kepler Mire are described in greater detail as Sites 71a and 71b, respectively. All of the wetlands have a similar glacial origin; however, individual sites vary as a consequence of their history, drainage (water table, amounts of ponded water), fertility, topography etc. The complex of peatlands contains a rich variety of plant communities which include several significant plant distributions and provide important habitat for wildlife. Physical features: The Te Anau Basin lies on the eastern margin of Fiordland, a gneiss/schist/granite massif uplifted by the Alpine Fault on its western margin and carved by extensive glaciation through the Quaternary. On its eastern flank, down-faulting in the Te Anau Basin area has contributed to the preservation of soft Tertiary sedimentary rocks, and the deposition of glacial gravels. During the last glaciation, glaciers occupied much of the basin. Depressions and areas of limited drainage developed in the moraines, tills and outwash gravels as the glaciers retreated. Wetlands have developed on these glacial outwash deposits of last glacial to post-glacial age.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban and Industry
    The Southland Economic Project URBAN AND INDUSTRY SOUTHLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL Cover photo: Matāura looking south across the Matāura River Source: Emma Moran The Southland Economic Project: Urban and Industry Technical Report May 2018 Editing Team: Emma Moran – Senior Policy Analyst/Economist (Environment Southland) Denise McKay – Policy and Planning Administrator (Environment Southland) Sue Bennett – Principal Environmental Scientist (Stantec) Stephen West – Principal Consents Officer (Environment Southland) Karen Wilson – Senior Science Co-ordinator (Environment Southland) SRC Publication No 2018-17 Document Quality Control Environment Policy, lanning and egulatory ervices Southland Division Report reference Title: The outhland conomic roject: Urb an ndustry No: 2018-17 Emma Moran, enio olicy nalyst/Economist, nvironment outhland Denis McKay, licy d anning Administrator, nvironment outhland Prepared by Sue ennett, Principal nvironmental cientist, tantec Stephen est, Principal onsents fficer, Environment Southland Karen ilson, enio cience o-ordinator, nvironment Southland Reviewed by: Ke urray, RMA anner, Departmen f onservation Approved for issue by The overnance ro or he outhlan conomic roject Date issued ay 2018 Project Code 03220.1302 Document History Version Final Status: Final Date May 2018 Doc ID: 978-0-909073-41-1 municipal fi i thi reproduced from consultants’ outputs devel wi territorial authoriti Southl Distri Council Southl Distri Council Invercargill Ci Council l reasonabl nformati withi thi incl esti cul average concentrations over four years Disclaimer multiplied by the annual flows. This is a ‘broad brush’ calculati i may di Envi Southl accounti contami National Poli val thi i system’s existing performance (the base) and its upgrade scenarios. Citation Advice Moran, ., McKay D., Bennett, ., West, ., an Wilson, .
    [Show full text]
  • Invercargill CITY COUNCIL
    Invercargill CITY COUNCIL NOTICE OF MEETING Notice is hereby given of the Meeting of the Infrastructure and Services Committee to be held in the Council Chamber, First Floor, Civic Administration Building, 101 Esk Street, Invercargill on Monday 22 August 2011 at 4.00 pm His Worship the Mayor Mr T R Shadbolt JP Cr C G Dean (Chair) Cr I R Pottinger (Deputy Chair) Cr R L Abbott Cr N D Boniface Cr T J Buck Cr A G Dennis Cr N J Elder Cr J Kruger EIRWEN TULETT MANAGER, SECRETARIAL SERVICES Finance and Corporate Services Directorate Civic Administration Building • 101 Esk Street • Private Bag 90104 Invercargill • 9840 New Zealand DX No. YA90023 • Telephone 03 211 1777 Fax 03 211 1433 AGENDA Page APOLOGIES PUBLIC FORUM MONITORING OF SERVICE PERFORMANCES 3.1 LEVELS OF SERVICE 3.1.1 Parks and Reserves 2 3.1.2 Public Toilets 2 3.1.3 Roading 3 3.1.4 Sewerage 12 3.1.5 Solid Waste Management 15 3.1.6 Stormwater 17 3.1.7 Water Supply Activity 20 ACTIVITY PLAN REVIEW 4.1 REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF WORKS AND SERVICES 4.1.1 Asset Management Plan, Core Buildings and Public Toilets 25 Outcomes from Workshop 4.1.2 Sewerage Asset Management Plan 2011 − Outcomes From 29 Workshop 4.1.3 Stormwater Asset Management Plan 2011 − Outcomes from 33 Workshop 4.1.4 Water Asset Management Plan 2012 − 2015 Outcomes from 37 Activity Workshop OTHER BUSINESS 5.1 REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF WORKS AND SERVICES 5.1.1 Clifton Wastewater Treatment Plant − Monfforing of Estuary 41 Sediments Appendix 1 43 Page 5.1.2 Stormwater Discharge Consent Applications 45 Appendix 1 49 5.1.3 Provision
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Extinction of Mutualistic Species – an Analysis of Ornithophilous Angiosperms in New Zealand
    DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES CO-EXTINCTION OF MUTUALISTIC SPECIES An analysis of ornithophilous angiosperms in New Zealand Sandra Palmqvist Degree project for Master of Science (120 hec) with a major in Environmental Science ES2500 Examination Course in Environmental Science, 30 hec Second cycle Semester/year: Spring 2021 Supervisor: Søren Faurby - Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences Examiner: Johan Uddling - Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences “Tui. Adult feeding on flax nectar, showing pollen rubbing onto forehead. Dunedin, December 2008. Image © Craig McKenzie by Craig McKenzie.” http://nzbirdsonline.org.nz/sites/all/files/1200543Tui2.jpg Table of Contents Abstract: Co-extinction of mutualistic species – An analysis of ornithophilous angiosperms in New Zealand ..................................................................................................... 1 Populärvetenskaplig sammanfattning: Samutrotning av mutualistiska arter – En analys av fågelpollinerade angiospermer i New Zealand ................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 2. Material and methods ............................................................................................................... 7 2.1 List of plant species, flower colours and conservation status ....................................... 7 2.1.1 Flower Colours .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]