DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed EU Integrated Action Programme for Life-Long Learning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposed EU Integrated Action Programme for Life-Long Learning HOUSE OF LORDS European Union Committee 17th Report of Session 2004-05 Proposed EU Integrated Action Programme for Life-long Learning Volume 2: Evidence Ordered to be printed 5 April 2005 and published 14 April 2005 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords London: The Stationery Office Limited £23.00 HL Paper 104-II CONTENTS Oral Evidence Department for Education and Skills (DfES), the British Council and the European Commission Written Evidence, DfES 1 Written Evidence, British Council 11 Oral Evidence, 19 January 2005 16 Supplementary Written Evidence, DfES 38 Supplementary Written Evidence, European Commission 58 Universities UK (UUK) and University Association for Contemporary European Studies (UACES) Written Evidence, UUK 60 Oral Evidence, 26 January 2005 65 Written Evidence, UACES 77 Oral Evidence, 26 January 2005 80 UK Socrates-Erasmus Council, Association of Colleges and the National Institute of Adult Continuing Education (NIACE) Written Evidence, UK Socrates-Erasmus Council 90 Oral Evidence, 2 February 2005 97 Written Evidence, Association of Colleges 105 Written Evidence, NIACE 108 Oral Evidence, 2 February 2005 111 Sylvia Mingay, Marguerite Hogg, Mark Cullens, ARCH, Grampus Heritage & Training Ltd and Morthyng Ltd Written Evidence, Sylvia Mingay 121 Written Evidence, Marguerite Hogg 122 Oral Evidence, 9 February 2005 125 Written Evidence, ARCH 132 Written Evidence, Grampus Heritage & Training Ltd 135 Written Evidence, Morthyng Ltd 142 Oral Evidence, 9 February 2005 145 Mr Ray Kirtley, University of Hull, Ms Jill Ritchie, Bristol Local Education Authority, Ms Julie Winyard, Benhall St Mary’s CofE Primary School, Saxmundham, Ms Sue Laffey Ounsdale High School,Staffordshire and Mr Martin Moorman, Ravenscliffe High School,Halifax Written Evidence, Ray Kirtley 153 Written Evidence, Jill Ritchie 153 Oral Evidence, 23 February 2005 154 Written Evidence, Julie Winyard 163 Written Evidence, Sue Laffey 169 Written Evidence, Martin Moorman 170 Oral Evidence, 23 February 2005 170 Learning and Skills Council Written Evidence, Learning and Skills Council 178 Oral Evidence, 24 February 2005 180 Dr Kim Howells MP, Minister of State for Lifelong Learning, Further and Higher Education, Department for Education and Skills Oral Evidence, 2 March 2005 191 Supplementary Written Evidence, DfES 202 Supplementary Written Evidence, UUK 215 Written Evidence ALG European Service 218 Bristol University 218 Letter from Baroness Thomas of Walliswood to CBI 219 Central Lancashire University 223 CILT, the National Centre for Languages 225 City & Guilds 228 Cumbria County Council Officers 229 Dr Paolo Dardanelli 230 ECOTEC 231 Educational Centres Association 233 Eurydice Unit at the National Foundation for Educational Research 234 Professor Robert Fisher 239 Glasgow University 240 Lawrence Hardy 241 Help the Aged 242 HEURO 243 The IEE (Institution of Electrical Engineers) 256 Leeds University 258 London Metropolitan University 262 Luton University 264 National Association of Language Advisers (NALA) 265 National Postgraduate Committee of the United Kingdom 265 North London Colleges European Network (NLCEN) 267 Open University 270 Liverpool John Moores University 270 Plymouth College of Further Education 271 SPRITO 273 Third Age Trust 274 David Tolliday, Projects Officer, Otley College 278 UK Erasmus Student Committee 279 Union of Industrial and Employers’ Confederation of Europe (UNICE) 282 Universities Council for the Education of Teachers (UCET) 289 University Council of Modern Languages (UCML) 290 Professor Roger Vickerman 292 Welsh Assembly Government 295 Work Foundation 300 Workers’ Educational Association (WEA) 301 NOTE: The Report of the Committee is published Volume 1, HL Paper No 104- 1. The Evidence of the Committee is published in Volume 2, HL Paper No. 104-2 Minutes of Evidence TAKEN BEFORE THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE EUROPEAN UNION (SUB-COMMITTEE G) WEDNESDAY 19 JANUARY 2005 Present Colwyn, L Howie of Troon, L Dundee, E Massey of Darwen, B Greengross, B Neuberger, B Harrison, L Thomas of Walliswood, B (Chairman) Howarth of Breckland, B Trefgarne, L Memorandum submitted by the Department for Education and Skills Subject Matter 1. The Commission’s 9 March 2004 Communication (Scrutiny Ref: 7351/04), heralded its intentions for a new generation of Community education and training programmes after 2006. On 14 July, the Commission adopted its formal proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and the Council to establish a new integrated lifelong learning programme for the period 2007–13 (document 11587/04, COM (2004) 474 final), building on the current education and training programmes: Socrates, Leonardo da Vinci and eLearning, the Europass initiative and the various actions funded through the Community action programme to promote bodies active at European level and to support specific activities in the fields of education and training. The draft Decision is broadly consistent with the Commission’s intentions as set out in its earlier Communication and contains specific programme objectives, scope, activities, target groups, delivery mechanisms and procedures. The Commission’s EM accompanying the draft Decision also foreshadows a longer term proposal to incorporate the Erasmus Mundus programme within the integrated lifelong learning programme in 2009, after the current Erasmus Mundus programme ends. 2. The overall objective of the integrated programme is to contribute, through lifelong learning, to the Lisbon goal for the EU to become an advanced knowledge-based society with sustainable economic development, more and better jobs and greater social cohesion. It aims to support these goals through promoting the exchange of best practice, co-operation and mobility between education and training systems within the EU, while respecting national diversity. Integrating Community support for these transnational activities is aimed at meeting the need (identified via current programme evaluations and public consultations including with the Member States) for better coherence and synergy between the diVerent education and training activities to support lifelong learning approaches; for simplified, more user-friendly and flexible programme implementation; and for more coherent, structured and eYcient administration mechanisms. The draft Decision proposes: a structure of common actions and procedures across the range of constituent Community activities, with a single programme committee to ensure overall coherence; greater decentralisation; and changes to reduce bureaucracy. 3. In addition to the Commission’s EM, the proposal is accompanied by a Commission StaV Working Paper (document 11587/04ADD1, SEC (2004) 971), published on 19 July 2004, consisting of an assessment of the likely impact of the programme on education and training systems and practice in Europe and an ex ante evaluation, based on national implementation reports and external evaluations of the current Socrates and Leonardo programmes, and on the Commission’s public consultation on the future of the programmes which it undertook early last year. It examines a range of issues including programme objectives and indicators, risks and assumptions, value added, subsidiarity, proportionality and cost implications. 2 life-long learning: evidence 19 January 2005 Background 4. The current Socrates and Leonardo da Vinci programmes are financed to the end of the current EU Financial Perspective on 31 December 2006. To replace them, the draft Decision proposes four specific programmes, integrated within an overall lifelong learning framework: Comenius for general education activities concerning schools up to and including upper secondary level; Erasmus, for higher education and advanced vocational education and training activities; Leonardo da Vinci for all other aspects of vocational education and training; and Grundtvig for adult education. Common activities across these four sectoral programmes would include: mobility of individuals such as exchanges and placements for pupils, students, trainees, adult learners, teachers, employers and representatives of institutions and organisations involved in education and training; partnerships and thematic networks for exchange of best practice between, respectively, schools, higher education institutions and vocational education and training institutions and enterprises; and multilateral projects for the development and transfer of innovation and good practice. The proposal also incorporates a new “transversal” programme to allow for horizontal activities that cut across the sectoral programmes, including: support for policy development in lifelong learning at European level in the context of the Lisbon, Bologna and Copenhagen processes; provision of comparable data, statistics, research and analysis; promoting language learning; supporting development of innovative ICT-based approaches for lifelong learning; and a more substantial dissemination of results than previously. It would also support activities within the Europass initiative as part of action to support transparency and recognition of qualifications and competences. Finally, a Jean Monnet programme would be incorporated to support action related to European integration in the academic field and European institutions and associations active in education and training. 5. The Commission indicates that the mobility of participants in the current programmes has a clear positive impact, not only on them, but also on the institutions with which they are involved. This helps to contribute
Load more

Recommended publications
  • England LEA/School Code School Name Town 330/6092 Abbey
    England LEA/School Code School Name Town 330/6092 Abbey College Birmingham 873/4603 Abbey College, Ramsey Ramsey 865/4000 Abbeyfield School Chippenham 803/4000 Abbeywood Community School Bristol 860/4500 Abbot Beyne School Burton-on-Trent 312/5409 Abbotsfield School Uxbridge 894/6906 Abraham Darby Academy Telford 202/4285 Acland Burghley School London 931/8004 Activate Learning Oxford 307/4035 Acton High School London 919/4029 Adeyfield School Hemel Hempstead 825/6015 Akeley Wood Senior School Buckingham 935/4059 Alde Valley School Leiston 919/6003 Aldenham School Borehamwood 891/4117 Alderman White School and Language College Nottingham 307/6905 Alec Reed Academy Northolt 830/4001 Alfreton Grange Arts College Alfreton 823/6905 All Saints Academy Dunstable Dunstable 916/6905 All Saints' Academy, Cheltenham Cheltenham 340/4615 All Saints Catholic High School Knowsley 341/4421 Alsop High School Technology & Applied Learning Specialist College Liverpool 358/4024 Altrincham College of Arts Altrincham 868/4506 Altwood CofE Secondary School Maidenhead 825/4095 Amersham School Amersham 380/6907 Appleton Academy Bradford 330/4804 Archbishop Ilsley Catholic School Birmingham 810/6905 Archbishop Sentamu Academy Hull 208/5403 Archbishop Tenison's School London 916/4032 Archway School Stroud 845/4003 ARK William Parker Academy Hastings 371/4021 Armthorpe Academy Doncaster 885/4008 Arrow Vale RSA Academy Redditch 937/5401 Ash Green School Coventry 371/4000 Ash Hill Academy Doncaster 891/4009 Ashfield Comprehensive School Nottingham 801/4030 Ashton
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire Standing Advisory Council on Religious Education
    Staffordshire Standing Advisory Council on Religious Education 24th Annual Report September 2013 - September 2014 1 From the Chair of SACRE SACREs (Standing Advisory Councils on Religious Education) are unusually distinctive in their composition, duties and procedures. They also vary considerably from one Local Authority to another, depending on such factors as which faith communities are represented, how well the SACRE is resourced, and how the SACRE itself has evolved over the last two decades. In the case of Staffordshire SACRE, for instance, there is a marked difference between the formal, tightly controlled character of SACRE meetings in the early 1990’s, and the participative, interactive nature of meetings in more recent years. I am sure this latter style enables each of the stakeholder groups in the SACRE better to “own” and identify with our SACRE’s work. In terms of Local Authority support, we are fortunate in Staffordshire SACRE to enjoy both the ongoing active involvement of County Council representatives and also the stability and encouragement provided by a ring-fenced level of resourcing carried over into the agreement with Entrust, together with the continuing and very welcome administrative services provided by the County Council. In these times of austerity, many SACREs are not so well placed. The exact composition of a SACRE is determined by its parent Local Authority, which will have due regard to the faith groups present in the area as well as to the broader picture of faiths and beliefs nationally and globally. The faith group composition of Staffordshire SACRE has remained largely static, even if the actual faith representatives change, but it is worth highlighting the addition to Group A of the Humanist representative, after some years technically as an observer.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Year 11 School Leavers Going Into Higher Education in 2010
    Tracking Progression: 2008 Year 11 school leavers going into Higher Education in 2010 Staffordshire & Stoke-on-Trent March 2011 Introduction Analysis of entry to Higher Education (HE) by Local Authority, district and mainstream, maintained high school This report shows the proportion of all 2008 Year 11 high school students who went on to enter Higher Education (HE) at age 18 in 2010 (i.e. after two years of further education). Figures include those who have an unconditional place offer and are taking a 'gap year'. This study includes those who have entered HE from both the school and college sectors. The report sub-divides the Year 11 cohort into quintiles based on where they live. So Quintile 1 represents those areas in the County/City that are among the 20% most deprived in the country and identifies how many learners in the cohort come from this quintile, and how many of those subsequently applied to higher education. Quintile 5 represents those from areas in the 20% least deprived in the country. The deprivation of an area is based on the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) which is described below (see*). To provide some comparison year on year, data for 2008 entry to HE has been included in the analysis. * The Index of Multiple Deprivation 2007 (IMD 2007) is based on the small area of geography known as Lower Super Output Areas (LSOAs). LSOAs have a population between 1,000 and 3,000 people, with an average of 1,500 people. In most cases, these are smaller than wards, thus allowing the identification of small pockets of deprivation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Admissions Cycle
    Applications, Offers & Acceptances by UCAS Apply Centre 2009 UCAS Apply Centre School Name Postcode School Sector Applications Offers Acceptances 10001 Ysgol Syr Thomas Jones LL68 9TH Maintained <4 0 0 10002 Ysgol David Hughes LL59 5SS Maintained 4 <4 <4 10008 Redborne Upper School and Community College MK45 2NU Maintained 5 <4 <4 10010 Bedford High School MK40 2BS Independent 7 <4 <4 10011 Bedford Modern School MK41 7NT Independent 18 <4 <4 10012 Bedford School MK40 2TU Independent 20 8 8 10014 Dame Alice Harpur School MK42 0BX Independent 8 4 <4 10018 Stratton Upper School, Bedfordshire SG18 8JB Maintained 5 0 0 10020 Manshead School, Luton LU1 4BB Maintained <4 0 0 10022 Queensbury Upper School, Bedfordshire LU6 3BU Maintained <4 <4 <4 10024 Cedars Upper School, Bedfordshire LU7 2AE Maintained 7 <4 <4 10026 St Marylebone Church of England School W1U 5BA Maintained 8 4 4 10027 Luton VI Form College LU2 7EW Maintained 12 <4 <4 10029 Abingdon School OX14 1DE Independent 15 4 4 10030 John Mason School, Abingdon OX14 1JB Maintained <4 0 0 10031 Our Lady's Abingdon Trustees Ltd OX14 3PS Independent <4 <4 <4 10032 Radley College OX14 2HR Independent 15 7 6 10033 The School of St Helen & St Katharine OX14 1BE Independent 22 9 9 10035 Dean College of London N7 7QP Independent <4 0 0 10036 The Marist Senior School SL57PS Independent <4 <4 <4 10038 St Georges School, Ascot SL5 7DZ Independent <4 0 0 10039 St Marys School, Ascot SL5 9JF Independent 6 <4 <4 10041 Ranelagh School RG12 9DA Maintained 8 0 0 10043 Ysgol Gyfun Bro Myrddin SA32 8DN Maintained
    [Show full text]
  • Ounsdale High School Ounsdale Road, Wombourne, Wolverhampton, West Midlands WV5 8BJ
    School report Ounsdale High School Ounsdale Road, Wombourne, Wolverhampton, West Midlands WV5 8BJ Inspection dates 13–14 March 2018 Overall effectiveness Requires improvement Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement 16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a school that requires improvement Pupils do not make enough progress in a Teachers do not consistently set hard enough number of curriculum areas, including work for pupils, particularly those with middle mathematics and humanities. or low prior attainment. As a result, these pupils make less progress than their more-able Disadvantaged pupils do less well than other peers. pupils in the school and nationally. Progress towards diminishing the differences between A new assessment system is in place across the disadvantaged pupils and their peers is too trust but it is not yet fully understood by staff, slow. pupils and parents. As a result, it is not effective enough in setting challenging targets, Leaders have a good understanding of the accurately tracking progress and identifying weaknesses of the school but their actions underachievement. have not had enough impact on improving outcomes for all pupils. The sixth form requires improvement. There is too much variation in the progress made by In some lessons pupils’ learning slows because students in different subject areas and too few they spend time on undemanding activities. students achieve the highest grades. The school has the following strengths Pupils are well cared for and feel safe.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Eligible Schools for Website 2019.Xlsx
    England LEA/Establishment Code School/College Name Town 873/4603 Abbey College, Ramsey Ramsey 860/4500 Abbot Beyne School Burton‐on‐Trent 888/6905 Accrington Academy Accrington 202/4285 Acland Burghley School London 307/6081 Acorn House College Southall 931/8004 Activate Learning Oxford 307/4035 Acton High School London 309/8000 Ada National College for Digital Skills London 919/4029 Adeyfield School Hemel Hempstead 935/4043 Alde Valley School Leiston 888/4030 Alder Grange School Rossendale 830/4089 Aldercar High School Nottingham 891/4117 Alderman White School Nottingham 335/5405 Aldridge School ‐ A Science College Walsall 307/6905 Alec Reed Academy Northolt 823/6905 All Saints Academy Dunstable Dunstable 916/6905 All Saints' Academy, Cheltenham Cheltenham 301/4703 All Saints Catholic School and Technology College Dagenham 879/6905 All Saints Church of England Academy Plymouth 383/4040 Allerton Grange School Leeds 304/5405 Alperton Community School Wembley 341/4421 Alsop High School Technology & Applied Learning Specialist College Liverpool 358/4024 Altrincham College Altrincham 868/4506 Altwood CofE Secondary School Maidenhead 825/4095 Amersham School Amersham 380/4061 Appleton Academy Bradford 341/4796 Archbishop Beck Catholic Sports College Liverpool 330/4804 Archbishop Ilsley Catholic School Birmingham 810/6905 Archbishop Sentamu Academy Hull 306/4600 Archbishop Tenison's CofE High School Croydon 208/5403 Archbishop Tenison's School London 916/4032 Archway School Stroud 851/6905 Ark Charter Academy Southsea 304/4001 Ark Elvin Academy
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Times All Schools
    Financial Times All Schools - March 2010 Based on 2009 A level results FT Rank 08 Rank FT FT Rank 09 Rank FT 07 Rank FT School Town School type score FT candidate level Points/A 09 exams) (core 09 entry level A Points/core 08 entry level A Points/core candidates Number of 09 exmas) (all 09 only level A taking Pupils 09 candidates) level % girls (A 09 entries/candidate level A Core 09 entries/candidate level A All 09 exams) (all Points/candidate 08 exams) (all Points/candidate 09 (Points/cand) rank Gov/DCSF 08 (Points/cand) rank Gov/DCSF 07 (Points/cand) rank Gov/DCSF exams) method (all 09 - FT Rank exams) method (all 08 - FT Rank exams) method (all 07 - FT Rank 09 subjects) (core grade/entry A % 08 subjects) (core grade/entry A % 09 subjects) (core AB/candidate No 09 AB rank AAB % cands at least 09 subjects) (core AAB % cands at least 08 subjects) (core Bedfordshire Bedford College Bedford Other 388 201 202 373 72 78 1.9 2.5 586 576 14 10 0.6 3 5 351 229 285 Bedford High School (IB) Bedford Ind 1.99 562 243 245 120 96 100 2.3 2.8 878 900 440 371 406 410 385 315 51 47 1.7 374 28 32 282 407 329 Bedford Modern School Bedford Ind 2.43 591 248 241 139 139 14 2.4 3.1 858 827 527 669 596 221 341 336 49 39 1.9 284 29 19 260 219 178 Bedford School (IB) Bedford Ind 2.55 655 241 241 142 94 0 2.7 3.2 946 906 239 352 324 311 404 285 45 44 2.0 252 31 32 768 Biddenham Up Sch & Sp Coll Bedford Comp 389 210 209 110 109 57 1.9 2.6 677 676 941 21 21 0.8 6 6 Cardinal Newman Cath Sch Luton Comp 342 205 201 95 83 57 1.7 2.6 666 672 16 14 0.6 5 1 Cedars Upper
    [Show full text]
  • 200326 Staffordshire Pension Fund 31 March 2019 Valuation Final
    Staffordshire Pension Fund Actuarial valuation as at 31 March 2019 Valuation report 26 March 2020 Staffordshire Pension Fund | Hymans Robertson LLP Contents Valuation report Page 1 Introduction 1 2 Valuation approach 3 3 Valuation results 5 4 Sensitivity analysis 10 5 Final comments 13 Appendices Appendix 1 – Data Appendix 2 – Assumptions Appendix 3 – Rates and Adjustments certificate Appendix 4 – Section 13 dashboard March 2020 Staffordshire Pension Fund | Hymans Robertson LLP 1 Introduction Background to the actuarial valuation Reliances and Limitations We have been commissioned by Staffordshire County Council (“the This report has been prepared for the sole use of Staffordshire County Council Administering Authority”) to carry out an actuarial valuation of the in its role as Administering Authority of the Fund to provide an actuarial Staffordshire Pension Fund (“the Fund”) as at 31 March 2019 as required valuation of the Fund as required under the Regulations. It has not been under Regulation 62 of the Local Government Pension Scheme Regulations prepared for any other third party or for any other purpose. We make no 2013 (“the Regulations”). representation or warranties to any third party as to the accuracy or completeness of this report, no reliance should be placed on this report by any The actuarial valuation is a risk management exercise with the purpose of third party and we accept no responsibility or liability to any third party in reviewing the current funding plans and setting contribution rates for the Fund’s respect of it. participating employers for the period from 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2023. This report summarises the outcomes of the valuation and the underlying advice Hymans Robertson LLP is the owner of all intellectual property rights in this provided to the Administering Authority throughout the valuation process.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Aston Ready School and College List
    School/College Name Postcode The Marlborough Science Academy AL1 2QA Townsend CofE School AL3 6DR Oaklands College AL4 0JA Sir Frederic Osborn School AL7 2AF Small Heath School B10 9RX George Dixon Academy B16 9GD Lordswood Girls' School and Sixth Form Centre B17 8QB Holte School B19 2EP Nishkam High School B19 2LF Hamstead Hall Academy B20 1HL King Edward VI Handsworth Wood Girls' Academy B20 2HL Broadway Academy B20 3DP Shenley Academy B29 4HE Central Academy B3 1SJ Greenwood Academy B35 7NL Smith's Wood Academy B36 0UE Park Hall Academy B36 9HF WMG Academy for Young Engineers (Solihull) B37 5FD John Henry Newman Catholic College B37 5GA Grace Academy Solihull B37 5JS CTC Kingshurst Academy B37 6NU Cadbury Sixth Form College B38 8QT Birmingham Metropolitan College B4 7PS Birmingham Ormiston Academy B4 7QD Q3 Academy B43 7SD North Birmingham Academy B44 0HF Great Barr Academy B44 8NU Waseley Hills High School B45 9EL The Coleshill School B46 3EX South and City College Birmingham B5 5SU North Bromsgrove High School B60 1BA Halesowen College B63 3NA Windsor High School and Sixth Form B63 4BB Ormiston Forge Academy B64 6QU Shireland Collegiate Academy B66 4ND Holly Lodge High School College of Science B67 7JG Perryfields High School Specialist Maths and Computing College B68 0RG Oldbury Academy B68 8NE Ormiston Sandwell Community Academy B69 2HE Aston University Engineering Academy B7 4AG Heartlands Academy B7 4QR Sandwell College B70 6AW Health Futures UTC B70 8DJ Sandwell Academy B71 4LG John Willmott School B75 7DY Fairfax B75 7JT Landau
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Summary of September 2017 Admissions to Secondary
    SUMMARY OF SEPTEMBER 2017 ADMISSIONS TO SECONDARY SCHOOLS Please note that this information was correct as at 24 February 2017. Changes may have taken place between the date this information was compiled and the date you are viewing it. OVERALL 1st PREFERENCE FIGURES 100% of 1st Preferences made for Admission to High School at Year 9 were successful. 92.5% of 1st Preferences made for Admission to Secondary School at Year 7 were successful. The % of 1st Preference Applications agreed within each area is as follows: Area % 1st Pref Area % 1st Pref Area % 1st Pref Agreed Agreed Agreed Biddulph 100% Blythe Bridge 98.8% Burntwood 83.2% Burton on Trent 87.15% Cannock 100% Cheadle 88.59% Cheslyn Hay / Great Wyrley 90.51% Codsall 100% Endon 97.14% Kidsgrove 100% Kinver / Wombourne 99.25% Leek 100% Lichfield 89.54% Newcastle under Lyme 92.81% Penkridge 100% Rugeley 100% Stafford 96.83% Stone 100% Tamworth 95.66% Uttoxeter 100% Werrington 80.65% Key to Headings First Preferences: The total number of 1st preference applications for admission to the school Published Admission Number: The published number used to determine the maximum number of places available for admission. Number Allocated: Total number of children due to be admitted to the school in September 2017 Number Refused: The total number of unsuccessful applicants Children in Care: Includes those children currently in public care and formerly in public care as defined within school admissions regulations. Statement of SEN/EHCP: Children with a statutory statement or Education Health Care allocated places Furthest Distance: Indicates the distance of the last child admitted under the distance criteria where applicable School First Published Number Number Children SEN/ Catchment Siblings Major Medical/ Distance Furthest Preferences Admission Allocated Refused in Care EHCP Contrib.
    [Show full text]
  • Eligible If Taken A-Levels at This School (Y/N)
    Eligible if taken GCSEs Eligible if taken A-levels School Postcode at this School (Y/N) at this School (Y/N) 16-19 Abingdon 9314127 N/A Yes 3 Dimensions TA20 3AJ No N/A Abacus College OX3 9AX No No Abbey College Cambridge CB1 2JB No No Abbey College in Malvern WR14 4JF No No Abbey College Manchester M2 4WG No No Abbey College, Ramsey PE26 1DG No Yes Abbey Court Foundation Special School ME2 3SP No N/A Abbey Gate College CH3 6EN No No Abbey Grange Church of England Academy LS16 5EA No No Abbey Hill Academy TS19 8BU Yes N/A Abbey Hill School and Performing Arts College ST3 5PR Yes N/A Abbey Park School SN25 2ND Yes N/A Abbey School S61 2RA Yes N/A Abbeyfield School SN15 3XB No Yes Abbeyfield School NN4 8BU Yes Yes Abbeywood Community School BS34 8SF Yes Yes Abbot Beyne School DE15 0JL Yes Yes Abbots Bromley School WS15 3BW No No Abbot's Hill School HP3 8RP No N/A Abbot's Lea School L25 6EE Yes N/A Abbotsfield School UB10 0EX Yes Yes Abbotsholme School ST14 5BS No No Abbs Cross Academy and Arts College RM12 4YB No N/A Abingdon and Witney College OX14 1GG N/A Yes Abingdon School OX14 1DE No No Abraham Darby Academy TF7 5HX Yes Yes Abraham Guest Academy WN5 0DQ Yes N/A Abraham Moss Community School M8 5UF Yes N/A Abrar Academy PR1 1NA No No Abu Bakr Boys School WS2 7AN No N/A Abu Bakr Girls School WS1 4JJ No N/A Academy 360 SR4 9BA Yes N/A Academy@Worden PR25 1QX Yes N/A Access School SY4 3EW No N/A Accrington Academy BB5 4FF Yes Yes Accrington and Rossendale College BB5 2AW N/A Yes Accrington St Christopher's Church of England High School
    [Show full text]
  • School Name POSTCODE AUCL Eligible If Taken GCSE's at This
    School Name POSTCODE AUCL Eligible if taken GCSE's at this AUCL Eligible if taken A-levels at school this school City of London School for Girls EC2Y 8BB No No City of London School EC4V 3AL No No Haverstock School NW3 2BQ Yes Yes Parliament Hill School NW5 1RL No Yes Regent High School NW1 1RX Yes Yes Hampstead School NW2 3RT Yes Yes Acland Burghley School NW5 1UJ No Yes The Camden School for Girls NW5 2DB No No Maria Fidelis Catholic School FCJ NW1 1LY Yes Yes William Ellis School NW5 1RN Yes Yes La Sainte Union Catholic Secondary NW5 1RP No Yes School St Margaret's School NW3 7SR No No University College School NW3 6XH No No North Bridge House Senior School NW3 5UD No No South Hampstead High School NW3 5SS No No Fine Arts College NW3 4YD No No Camden Centre for Learning (CCfL) NW1 8DP Yes No Special School Swiss Cottage School - Development NW8 6HX No No & Research Centre Saint Mary Magdalene Church of SE18 5PW No No England All Through School Eltham Hill School SE9 5EE No Yes Plumstead Manor School SE18 1QF Yes Yes Thomas Tallis School SE3 9PX No Yes The John Roan School SE3 7QR Yes Yes St Ursula's Convent School SE10 8HN No No Riverston School SE12 8UF No No Colfe's School SE12 8AW No No Moatbridge School SE9 5LX Yes No Haggerston School E2 8LS Yes Yes Stoke Newington School and Sixth N16 9EX No No Form Our Lady's Catholic High School N16 5AF No Yes The Urswick School - A Church of E9 6NR Yes Yes England Secondary School Cardinal Pole Catholic School E9 6LG No No Yesodey Hatorah School N16 5AE No No Bnois Jerusalem Girls School N16
    [Show full text]