Quick viewing(Text Mode)

Mathematical Stereochemistry As the Theoretical Foundations of Organic and Inorganic Chemistry

Mathematical Stereochemistry As the Theoretical Foundations of Organic and Inorganic Chemistry

J. Comput. Chem. Jpn., Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 52–57 (2017) ©2017 Society of Computer , Japan

Mathematical as the Theoretical Foundations of Organic and

Shinsaku Fujita

Shonan Institute of Chemoinformatics and Mathematical Chemistry, Kaneko 479-7, Ooimachi, Ashigara-Kami-Gun, Kanagawa, 258-0019, Japan e-mail: [email protected]

(Received: January 8, 2017; Accepted for publication: February 8, 2017; Online publication: June 6, 2017)

Mathematical stereochemistry is discussed by surveying books written on Fujita's USCI (unit-subduced-cycle- index) approach, Fujita's proligand method, Fujita's stereoisogram approach, and related matters from a viewpoint of developing an interdisciplinary chemistry/ . Keywords: Stereochemistry, Sphericity, Enumeration, USCI, Stereoisogram

1 Introduction by digital electronic photography [6]. This book summarized the history of film-based photography from a viewpoint of syn- In 2015, I published a book entitled "Mathematical Stereo- thetic . In particular, Chapter 19 of this book chemistry" as a milestone of my interdisciplinary research for deals with the accomplishments of our research on organic linking chemistry and mathematics [1]. This book has aimed compounds for instant color photography in Fuji Photo Film at comprehensive discussions on the theoretical foundations of Co. for 25 years (1972–1997). organic and inorganic chemistry on the basis of Fujita's stereo- Through our efforts to develop dye releasers of high efficien- isogram approach [2,3]. Because this book owes many funda- cy for instant color photography, I was deeply impressed with mental ideas to a series of books I have published previously, the importance of non-bonding stereochemical effects. This is it is a meaningful task to survey these previous books from a because a steric hindrance due to a bulky substituent (e.g., a viewpoint of how their ideas are taken over to produce the new tert-butyl group) and a stereochemical assistance due to a six- book. This task would provide a succinct prospect to my "Half- membered transition state (e.g., a methoxyethoxy group) were Century Journey from Synthetic Organic Chemistry to Math- key technologies introduced into dye-releasing moieties. ematical Stereochemistry through Chemoinformatics" [4]. 2.2 Computer-Oriented Representation of 2 Serial Survey of my Books Organic Reactions [7]

I will here survey my books in the order of carrying out re- The next target of my research in Fuji Photo Film Co. was spective researches, but not in the chronological order of pub- concerned with chemoinformatics, where I aimed at the devel- lication. opment of a reaction database. I proposed imaginary transition structures (ITSs) as the computer-oriented representation of or- 2.1 Organic Chemistry of Photography [5] ganic reactions [8]. Figure 1 shows the construction of an imag-

I published a book entitled "Organic Chemistry of Photog- inary transition structure (ITS) for representing an acid-cata- raphy" (xiv + 587 pages) from Springer in 2004 [5], when lyzed hydrolysis of ethyl acetate. The resulting ITS 1 contains film-based photography was highly expected to be replaced three kinds of bonds, i.e., par-bonds (—), in-bonds (—o—), and

52 DOI: 10.2477/jccj.2017-0002 lated to Burnside's tables of marks. For the purpose of treating chiral ligands, I have developed the concepts of sphericities of orbits and chirality fittingness. Under the name Fujita's USCI approach, the four methods of symmetry-itemized enumerations were developed and their versatility was testified by using various skeletons as probes [10]. In addition to these quantitative applications, Fujita's USCI approach also enables us to develop qualitative discus- sions on prochirality and symmetric properties of various mol- ecules [11,12]. Fujita's USCI approach was summarized in a book entitled "Symmetry and Combinatorial Enumeration in Chemistry" (x + 368 pages), which was published from Springer in 1991. Figure 1. Construction of an imaginary transition structure 2.4 Diagrammatical Approach to Molecu- (ITS) for representing an acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of ethyl lar Symmetry and Enumeration of Ste- acetate [8]. reoisomers [13]

Fujita's USCI approach emphasizes the concept of equiva- out-bonds (—||—), which are capable of representing a reaction lence classes (orbits), which act intramolecularly and intermo- process of the acid-catalyzed hydrolysis. lecularly in a nested fashion. The nested features were formu- After I had changed my positions to Kyoto Institute of Tech- lated diagrammatically by the concept of mandala [14]. nology, I summarized the versatility of ITSs in the form of a The diagrammatical approach based on the concept of man- book entitled "Computer-Oriented Representation of Organic dala and related ideas was summarized as a book entitled Reactions" (x + 371 pages) [7], which was published from Yo- "Diagrammatical Approach to Molecular Symmetry and Enu- shioka Shoten by the financial support of Japan Society for the meration of Stereoisomers" (x + 206 pages) [13], which was Promotion of : Grant-in-Aid for Publication Research published as Volume 4 of "Mathematical Chemistry Mono- Results (No. 135305, 2001). graphs" series in 2007. Because ITSs were formulated as 2D structural formulas with three kinds of bonds, we were able to enumerate organic 2.5 Combinatorial Enumeration of Graphs, reactions by applying Pólya's theorem to ITSs in place of usual Three-Dimensional Structures, and Chemical Compounds [15] 2D structural formulas of organic compounds. This experience interested me in the application of combinatorial enumeration Fujita's USCI approach supports both symmetry-itemized to organic compounds as 3D structures. and gross enumerations of chemical compounds as 3D struc- 2.3 Symmetry and Combinatorial Enumer- tures. However, a simpler method for gross enumeration of 3D ation in Chemistry [9] structures should be developed to stand comparison with the simple procedure of Pólya's theorem. Through my research on ITSs, I became aware that Pólya's For this purpose, I have developed Fujita's proligand method theorem covered enumeration of graphs, but not 3D structures. [16]. The concept of sphericities of orbits for Fujita's USCI ap- Hence, new methods of enumerating chemical compounds as proach has been transformed into the concept of sphericities 3D structures (not as graphs) should be developed to begin with. of cycles for Fujita's proligand method, which enables us to To enumerate both graphs and 3D structures, I developed the calculate cycle indices with chirality fittingness(CI-CFs). Fu- concept of unit subduced cycle indices (USCIs), after I formu- jita's proligand method has been applied successfully to com- lated the subduction of coset representations, which was corre- binatorial enumeration of as 3D structures. This means

DOI: 10.2477/jccj.2017-0002 53 that the long-standing interdisciplinary chemistry/mathematics problem over 130 years has been solved systematically [17]. Fujita's proligand method and related tools for gross enu- meration have been summarized as a book entitled "Combina- torial Enumeration of Graphs, Three-Dimensional Structures, and Chemical Compounds" (xiv + 576 pages) [15], which was published in 2013 as Volume 15 of "Mathematical Chemistry Monographs" series. 2.6 Mathematical Stereochemistry [1]

My latest book entitled "Mathematical Stereochemistry" (xviii + 437 pages) [1], which was published in 2015 from De Figure 2. Type-I stereoisogram for characterizing a promol- Gruyter, deals with Fujita's stereoisogram approach with vari- ecule with the composition ABXY, where the letters A, B, X, ous diagrammatic tools. and Y represent achiral proligands. Fujita's stereoisogram approach provides us with methodol- ogy to clarify the roots of serious confusion in modern stereo- Heavens of Fujita" by El-Basil (Figure 35 of [18]) at the time of chemistry and to eliminate them systematically. I have proposed 2001, when barriers to access (stereochemical and mathemati- the concept of RS-stereoisomerism [2], which is an intermedi- cal barriers) have been emphasized because of the interdisci- ate concept for mediating enantiomerism and stereoisomerism. plinary methodology of Fujita's USCI approach. El-Basil has The concept of RS-stereoisomerism is formulated algebraically later discussed three main stages that led to the development by an RS-stereoisomeric group and diagrammatically by such a of a systematic study of (stereo)chemical enumeration stereoisogram as shown in Figure 2. and has referred to the "Era of Fujita" as the third stage [19]. The vertical direction of the stereoisogram (Figure 2) is El-Basil's efforts have been focused on the elimination of a concerned with chirality, while the horizontal direction is con- mathematical barrier (e.g., ) in combinatorial enu- cerned with RS-stereogenicity. The concept of RS-stereogenici- meration, because most organic are unfamiliar with ty is derived by the meaningful restriction of stereogenicity, so group theory. that we are able to determine how chirality and stereogenicity As found in the survey of the preceding section, on the other are distinct and how they interact each other. Because stereo- hand, my efforts have aimed at systematizing so-called "Heav- isograms are key devices for avoiding the conceptual defects of ens of Fujita." This course means an attempt to establish math- modern stereochemistry, this way is called Fujita's stereoiso- ematical stereochemistry, which would provide us with the gram approach. theoretical foundations of organic and inorganic chemistry. The publication of my latest book in 2015 [1] has resulted in the 3 Perspectives of Mathematical Stereo- demonstration of why organic and inorganic chemists should chemistry try access to mathematical stereochemistry (~"the Heavens

As conclusive remarks on my ideas for advancing mathemat- of Fujita" systematized in terms of Fujita's stereoisogram ap- ical stereochemistry, I here introduce my recent works which proach). Figure 3, which is a revised version of El-Basil's cari- have been done during and after the publication of my new cature (Figure 35 of [18]), illustrates that my latest book [1] book [1]. creates a reliable bridge for giving perspectives on so-called "Heavens of Fujita" and on "Mathematical Stereochemistry" 3.1 Beyond the Situations Caricatured as (its title). "the Heavens of Fujita" As new matters added to so-called "Heavens of Fujita," Fujita's USCI approach [9] has once been caricatured as "the qualitative and diagrammatic tools derived from Fujita's USCI

54 J. Comput. Chem. Jpn., Vol. 16, No. 2 (2017) time, misleading standpoints for pro-R/pro-S-descriptors [25] have been avoided rationally by means of Fujita's stereoiso- gram approach [26]. Fujita's stereoisogram approach [1] indicates the presence of two kinds of handedness, i.e., chirality and RS-stereogenicity [27]. As a result, a stereoisogram specifies a quadruplet of RS- stereoisomers, which exhibits a net interaction between chiral- ity and stereogenicity. One of the conceptual defects of modern stereochemistry has been concluded to be the perception of chi- rality as a single kind of handedness, which means the neglect Figure 3. Mathematical barriers and stereochemical barriers of RS-stereogenicity as another kind handedness [28]. (Figure 15.2 of [1]). A reliable bridge for assuring the access to "the Heavens of Fujita" has been created by my recent book 3.3 Restructuring the Scheme of Isomer [1]. This Figure is a revision of El-Basil's caricature (Figure 35 Classification of [18]). The conventional stereochemistry adopts the following scheme of isomer classification: approach (e.g., mandalas [13]) have been developed to discuss + geometric properties of 3D structures; and discussions on ste- enantiomerism diastereoisomerism ⊆+stereoisomerism constitutional isomerism reochemistry and stereoisomerism in an integrated fashion have ⊆ (1) isomerism, been conducted by means of such qualitative and diagrammatic tools as derived by Fujita's stereoisogram approach [1]. The de- which suffers from the misleading subdivision of into velopment of these tools would reinforce the access to so-called constitutional isomers (isomers different in their constitutions) "Heavens of Fujita" and to mathematical chemistry. Moreover, and stereoisomers (isomers having the same constitution) [29] Fujita's USCI approach for symmetry-itemized enumeration as well as from the misleading subdivision of stereoisomers [9] has been simplified into Fujita's proligand method for gross into enantiomers and diastereomers. It is unfortunate for chem- enumeration [15], which has become more familiar to organic istry students and researchers that the misleading scheme (Eq. and inorganic chemists. 1) is adopted in the form of flowcharts in textbooks on organic 3.2 Restructuring the System of Stereo- chemistry as well as on organic and inorganic stereochemistry. chemical Nomenclature The misleading features of the traditional scheme (Eq. 1) stem from the neglect of equivalence relationships and equiva- The CIP system [20,21] adopts chirality as a single kind of lence classes, which is recognized to be another one of the con- handedness, so that an absolute configuration is simply linked ceptual defects of modern stereochemistry. I have established with chirality. I have pointed out three aspects of an absolute the following hierarchy of isomerism [30,31] after the introduc- configuration on the basis of the stereoisogram approach [22]. tion of isoskeletomerism as an additional intermediate concept Fujita's stereoisogram approach [1] is capable of integrating for mediating between stereoisomerism and isomerism: the three aspects of an absolute configuration in the form of a enantiomerism ⊆−RS stereoisomerism stereoisogram. Thereby, the theoretical foundations of stereo- ⊆⊆stereoisomerism isoskeletomerism chemistry and stereoisomerism have been restructured, so as to ⊆ isomerism, (2) revise the system of stereochemical nomenclature in a rational fashion [23]. where the boldfaced stages of the hierarchy are new matters, For example, misleading standpoints for R/S-stereodescrip- which have been overlooked in the traditional terminology of tors of the CIP system [20,21] have been avoided rationally organic chemistry. The respective stages of the hierarchy (Eq. by means of Fujita's stereoisogram approach [24]. At the same 2) connote the corresponding equivalence relationships, i.e.,

DOI: 10.2477/jccj.2017-0002 55 Figure 4. Isomer-classification diagram for isomers having the molecular formula C6H4X2, which are derived from Kekulé's benzene and prismane (Ladenburg's benzene). A pair of square brackets contains a pair of (self)-enantiomers as an equivalence class, a pair of parentheses with a subscript (I or IV) contains a quadruplet of RS-stereoisomers as an equivalence class, a pair of angle brackets contains an equivalence class of stereoisomers, and a pair of braces contains an equivalence class of isoskeletomers. A pair of self- enantiomers means an achiral promolecule as a single-membered orbit (e.g., [4]). This Figure is a modification of Figure 2 of [30]. enantiomeric relationships, RS-stereoisomeric relationships, archy (Eq. 3) [32]. stereoisomeric relationships, isoskeletomeric relationships, and 3.5 Toward the Spread of Mathematical isomeric relationships. Each of these equivalence relationships Stereochemistry produces a definite set of promolecules as an equivalence class (orbit). The inclusion behavior among the resulting sets (as To popularize mathematical stereochemistry, organic mole- orbits) is demonstrated diagrammatically by an isomer-classi- cules which attract interests of organic chemists should be sys- fication diagram [30,31]. For example, Figure 4 illustrates an tematically examined by a serial application of Fujita's USCI isomer-classification diagram for isomers having the molecu- approach [9], Fujita's proligand method [15], and Fujita's ste- reoisogram approach [1]. According to this guideline, I have lar formula C6H4X2. Note that the introduction of the concept of isoskeletomers (Eq. 2) is capable of differentiating between conducted systematic enumeration of cubane derivatives and Kekulé's benzenes and prismanes (Ladenburg's benzenes). And discussed their symmetries [33]. note that the traditional "positional isomerism" among 4, 5, and Finally, such a stereoisogram as Figure 2 is regarded as a uni- 6 is characterized as an inequivalence relationship within an fied representation of stereoisomerization as a kind of organic equivalence class of isoskeletomers {…}. reaction, because the horizontal direction is recognized to show stereoisomerization (racemization, epimerization) between 2 3.4 Systematic Enumeration under the Group and 3. Imagine a (real) transition state of the Walden inversion Hierarchy [29], i.e., Y + 2 → 3 + Y, in accord with the horizontal direction The hierarchy of isomerism shown by equation 2 can be of Figure 2; and at the same time, imagine an imaginary transi- transformed into the following hierarchy of groups: tion structure (ITS) for this process. The unified feature of a stereoisogram is parallel to the unified feature of the ITS shown point groups⊆− RS stereoisomeric groups ⊆⊆ (3) in Figure 1. This resemblance would be a guideline to future stereoisomeric groups isoskeletal groups. research on mathematical stereochemistry. Fujita's USCI approach and Fujita's proligand method, which have originally supported symmetry-itemized enumeration and gross enumeration under point groups, can be extended to be applicable to the respective groups contained in the group hier-

56 J. Comput. Chem. Jpn., Vol. 16, No. 2 (2017) References [17] S. Fujita, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 83, 1 (2010). DOI:10.1246/ bcsj.20090008 [1] S. Fujita, "Mathematical Stereochemistry", De Gruyter, [18] S. El-Basil, "Combinatorial Organic Chemistry: An Edu- Berlin (2015). cational Approach", Nova Science, Huntington, New [2] S. Fujita, J. Org. Chem., 69, 3158 (2004). PMID:15104457, York (2000). DOI:10.1021/jo030393v [19] S. El-Basil, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 46, [3] S. Fujita, Tetrahedron, 60, 11629 (2004). DOI:10.1016/j. 7–23 (2002). tet.2004.09.068 [20] R. S. Cahn, C. K. Ingold, V. Prelog, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. [4] S. Fujita, Iranian, J. Math. Chem., 7, 155 (2016). Engl., 5, 385 (1966). DOI:10.1002/anie.196603851 [5] S. Fujita, "Organic Chemistry of Photography", Springer- [21] V. Prelog, G. Helmchen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 21, Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg (2004). 567 (1982). DOI:10.1002/anie.198205671 [6] S. Fujita, Yuki Gosei Kagaku Kyokai-Shi, J. Synth. Org. [22] S. Fujita, J. Math. Chem., 52, 1514 (2014). DOI:10.1007/ Chem. Jpn., 67, 1286 (2009). DOI:10.5059/yukigosei- s10910-014-0326-0 kyokaishi.67.1286 [23] S. Fujita, Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 25, 1153 (2014). [7] S. Fujita, "Computer-Oriented Representation of Organic DOI:10.1016/j.tetasy.2014.07.009 Reactions", Yoshioka-Shoten, Kyoto (2001). [24] S. Fujita, Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 25, 1169 (2014). [8] S. Fujita, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 26, 205 (1986). DOI:10.1016/j.tetasy.2014.07.008 DOI:10.1021/ci00052a009 [25] K. R. Hanson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 88, 2731 (1966). [9] S. Fujita, "Symmetry and Combinatorial Enumeration in DOI:10.1021/ja00964a022 Chemistry", Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg (1991). [26] S. Fujita, Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 25, 1190 (2014). [10] S. Fujita, Chem. Rec., 2, 164 (2002). PMID:12112868 DOI:10.1016/j.tetasy.2014.07.010 [11] S. Fujita, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112, 3390 (1990). [27] S. Fujita, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 89, 987 (2016). DOI:10.1021/ja00165a021 DOI:10.1246/bcsj.20160108 [12] S. Fujita, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 75, 1863 (2002). [28] S. Fujita, Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 28, 1 (2017). DOI:10.1246/bcsj.75.1863 DOI:10.1016/j.tetasy.2016.11.012 [13] S. Fujita, "Diagrammatical Approach to Molecular Sym- [29] iuPAC Organic Chemistry Division, Pure Appl. Chem., metry and Enumeration of Stereoisomers", University of 68, 2193 (1996). Kragujevac, Faculty of Science, Kragujevac (2007). [30] S. Fujita, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 87, 1367 (2014). [14] S. Fujita, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 55, DOI:10.1246/bcsj.20140190 5–38 (2006). [31] S. Fujita, Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 27, 43 (2016). [15] S. Fujita, "Combinatorial Enumeration of Graphs, Three- DOI:10.1016/j.tetasy.2015.11.005 Dimensional Structures, and Chemical Compounds", [32] S. Fujita, J. Math. Chem., 53, 1010 (2015). DOI:10.1007/ University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Science, Kragujevac s10910-014-0467-1 (2013). [33] S. Fujita, Chem. Rec., 16, 1116 (2016). PMID:27027497, [16] S. Fujita, Theor. Chem. Acc., 113, 73 (2005). DOI:10.1007/ DOI:10.1002/tcr.201500234 s00214-004-0605-0

DOI: 10.2477/jccj.2017-0002 57