DOCSLIB.ORG

SEA and Integration of the Environment Into Strategic Decision- Making

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SEA and Integration of the Environment Into Strategic Decision- Making SEA and Integration of the Environment into Strategic Decision- Making European Commission Contract No. B4-3040/99/136634/MAR/B4 Volume 2 Country Reports Prepared by: Imperial College Consultants Ltd (ICON) William Sheate, Suzan Dagg, Kelli O’Donnell Babtie Allott & Lomax, UK Jeremy Richardson Wissenschaftsladen Graz/Austrian Institute for the Development of Environmental Assessment (ANIDEA) Austria Ralf Aschemann ECA, Spain Juan Palerm CESAM, University of Aarhus, Denmark Ulla Steen May 2001 SEA and Integration of the Environment into Strategic Decision-Making Final Report, Volume 2, May 2001 CEC Contract No. B4-3040/99/136634/MAR/B4 SEA and Integration of the Environment into Strategic Decision-Making Volume 2 (Country Reports) Final Report to the European Commission Contract No. B4-3040/99/136634/MAR/B4 Authors: William Sheate Suzan Dagg Jeremy Richardson Ralf Aschemann Juan Palerm Ulla Steen Kelli O’Donnell May 2001 Imperial College Consultants Ltd College House 47 Prince’s Gate Exhibition Road London SW7 2QA United Kingdom Tel: 020 7594 65465 Fax: 020 7594 6570 Email: [email protected] SEA and Integration of the Environment into Strategic Decision-Making Final Report, Volume 2, May 2001 CEC Contract No. B4-3040/99/136634/MAR/B4 SEA and Integration of the Environment into Strategic Decision-Making Final Report, Volume 2, May 2001 CEC Contract No. B4-3040/99/136634/MAR/B4 Contents – Volume 2 (Country Reports) Chapter Page No. 1. Introduction 1 EU Countries 2. Austria 3 2.1 Introduction 3 2.2 Extent to Which the Environment is Integrated into Decision -Making 3 2.3 Mechanisms Allowing for Integration of the Environment at Agenda Setting, Policy Making and Strategic Levels 4 2.4 Types of Policies, Plans and Programmes to Which SEA or Similar is Applied 6 2.5 Institutions/Organisations Responsible for SEA and Integration of the Environment into Decision-Making 6 2.6 Persons Involved in Agenda Setting Process and Their Level of Influence in Decision-Making and Integration of Environmental Considerations 6 2.7 Decision-Making Bodies and Influence of Domestic Background and Sector; Key Pieces of Legislation 7 3. Belgium 8 3.1 Introduction 8 3.2 Extent to Which the Environment is Integrated into Decision -Making 8 3.3 Mechanisms Allowing for Integration of the Environment at Agenda Setting, Policy Making and Strategic Levels 9 3.4 Types of Policies, Plans and Programmes to Which SEA or Similar is Applied 11 3.5 Institutions/Organisations Responsible for SEA and Integration of the Environment into Decision-Making 11 3.6 Persons Involved in Agenda Setting Process and Their Level of Influence in Decision-Making and Integration of Environmental Considerations 12 3.7 Decision-Making Bodies and Influence of Domestic Background and Sector; Key Pieces of Legislation 12 SEA and Integration of the Environment into Strategic Decision-Making Final Report, Volume 2, May 2001 CEC Contract No. B4-3040/99/136634/MAR/B4 4. Denmark 14 4.1 Introduction 14 4.2 Extent to Which the Environment is Integrated into Decision -Making 14 4.3 Mechanisms Allowing for Integration of the Environment at Agenda Setting, Policy Making and Strategic Levels 16 4.4 Types of Policies, Plans and Programmes to Which SEA or Similar is Applied 17 4.5 Institutions/Organisations Responsible for SEA and Integration of the Environment into Decision-Making 18 4.6 Persons Involved in Agenda Setting Process and Their Level of Influence in Decision-Making and Integration of Environmental Considerations 20 4.7 Decision-Making Bodies and Influence of Domestic Background and Sector; Key Pieces of Legislation 21 5. Finland 23 5.1 Introduction 23 5.2 Extent to Which the Environment is Integrated into Decision -Making 23 5.3 Mechanisms Allowing for Integration of the Environment at Agenda Setting, Policy Making and Strategic Levels 24 5.4 Types of Policies, Plans and Programmes to Which SEA or Similar is Applied 25 5.5 Institutions/Organisations Responsible for SEA and Integration of the Environment into Decision-Making 25 5.6 Persons Involved in Agenda Setting Process and Their Level of Influence in Decision-Making and Integration of Environmental Considerations 27 5.7 Decision-Making Bodies and Influence of Domestic Background and Sector; Key Pieces of Legislation 28 6. France 29 6.1 Introduction 29 6.2 Extent to Which the Environment is Integrated into Decision -Making 29 6.3 Mechanisms Allowing for Integration of the Environment at Agenda Setting, Policy Making and Strategic Levels 30 6.4 Types of Policies, Plans and Programmes to Which SEA or Similar is Applied 31 6.5 Institutions/Organisations Responsible for SEA and Integration of the Environment into Decision-Making 33 6.6 Persons Involved in Agenda Setting Process and Their Level of Influence in Decision-Making and Integration of Environmental Considerations 34 6.7 Decision-Making Bodies and Influence of Domestic Background and Sector; Key Pieces of Legislation 34 SEA and Integration of the Environment into Strategic Decision-Making Final Report, Volume 2, May 2001 CEC Contract No. B4-3040/99/136634/MAR/B4 7. Germany 35 7.1 Introduction 35 7.2 Extent to Which the Environment is Integrated into Decision -Making 35 7.3 Mechanisms Allowing for Integration of the Environment at Agenda Setting, Policy Making and Strategic Levels 36 7.4 Types of Policies, Plans and Programmes to Which SEA or Similar is Applied 36 7.5 Institutions/Organisations Responsible for SEA and Integration of the Environment into Decision-Making 37 7.6 Persons Involved in Agenda Setting Process and Their Level of Influence in Decision-Making and Integration of Environmental Considerations 38 7.7 Decision-Making Bodies and Influence of Domestic Background and Sector; Key Pieces of Legislation 38 8. Greece 40 8.1 Introduction 40 8.2 Extent to Which the Environment is Integrated into Decision -Making 40 8.3 Mechanisms Allowing for Integration of the Environment at Agenda Setting, Policy Making and Strategic Levels 41 8.4 Types of Policies, Plans and Programmes to Which SEA or Similar is Applied 42 8.5 Institutions/Organisations Responsible for SEA and Integration of the Environment into Decision-Making 42 8.6 Persons Involved in Agenda Setting Process and Their Level of Influence in Decision-Making and Integration of Environmental Considerations 43 8.7 Decision-Making Bodies and Influence of Domestic Background and Sector; Key Pieces of Legislation 43 9. Ireland 44 9.1 Introduction 44 9.2 Extent to Which the Environment is Integrated into Decision -Making 44 9.3 Mechanisms Allowing for Integration of the Environment at Agenda Setting, Policy Making and Strategic Levels 45 9.4 Types of Policies, Plans and Programmes to Which SEA or Similar is Applied 46 9.5 Institutions/Organisations Responsible for SEA and Integration of the Environment into Decision-Making 46 9.6 Persons Involved in Agenda Setting Process and Their Level of Influence in Decision-Making and Integration of Environmental Considerations 47 9.7 Decision-Making Bodies and Influence of Domestic Background and Sector; Key Pieces of Legislation 47 SEA and Integration of the Environment into Strategic Decision-Making Final Report, Volume 2, May 2001 CEC Contract No. B4-3040/99/136634/MAR/B4 10. Italy 50 10.1 Introduction 50 10.2 Extent to Which the Environment is Integrated into Decision -Making 50 10.3 Mechanisms Allowing for Integration of the Environment at Agenda Setting, Policy Making and Strategic Levels 50 10.4 Types of Policies, Plans and Programmes to Which SEA or Similar is Applied 51 10.5 Institutions/Organisations Responsible for SEA and Integration of the Environment into Decision-Making 52 10.6 Persons Involved in Agenda Setting Process and Their Level of Influence in Decision-Making and Integration of Environmental Considerations 52 10.7 Decision-Making Bodies and Influence of Domestic Background and Sector; Key Pieces of Legislation 52 11. Luxembourg 53 11.1 Introduction 53 11.2 Extent to Which the Environment is Integrated into Decision -Making 53 11.3 Mechanisms Allowing for Integration of the Environment at Agenda Setting, Policy Making and Strategic Levels 53 11.4 Persons Involved in Agenda Setting Process and Their Level of Influence in Decision-Making and Integration of Environmental Considerations 53 12. The Netherlands 54 12.1 Introduction 54 12.2 Extent to Which the Environment is Integrated into Decision -Making 54 12.3 Mechanisms Allowing for Integration of the Environment at Agenda Setting, Policy Making and Strategic Levels 12.4 Types of Policies, Plans and Programmes to Which SEA or Similar is Applied 56 12.5 Institutions/Organisations Responsible for SEA and Integration of the Environment into Decision-Making 56 12.6 Persons Involved in Agenda Setting Process and Their Level of Influence in Decision-Making and Integration of Environmental Considerations 58 12.7 Decision-Making Bodies and Influence of Domestic Background and Sector; Key Pieces of Legislation 58 13. PortugaPortugal lll 60 13.1 Introduction 60 13.2 Extent to Which the Environment is Integrated into Decision -Making 60 13.3 Mechanisms Allowing for Integration of the Environment at Agenda Setting, Policy Making and Strategic Levels 60 13.4 Types of Policies, Plans and Programmes to Which SEA or Similar is Applied 62 SEA and Integration of the Environment into Strategic Decision-Making Final Report, Volume 2, May 2001 CEC Contract No. B4-3040/99/136634/MAR/B4 13.5 Institutions/Organisations Responsible for SEA and Integration of the Environment into Decision-Making 62 13.6 Persons Involved in Agenda Setting Process
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Sedlacek, Sabine; Schubert, Uwe Conference Paper The Impact Of Success Factors For Environmental Innovation For Regional Development Strategies - How Can Regions Benefit From Environmental Specialisation? 40th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "European Monetary Union and Regional Policy", August 29 - September 1, 2000, Barcelona, Spain Provided in Cooperation with: European Regional Science Association (ERSA) Suggested Citation: Sedlacek, Sabine; Schubert, Uwe (2000) : The Impact Of Success Factors For Environmental Innovation For Regional Development Strategies - How Can Regions Benefit From Environmental Specialisation?, 40th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "European Monetary Union and Regional Policy", August 29 - September 1, 2000, Barcelona, Spain, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la-Neuve This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/114859 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Urban Sustainability
    MEASURING URBAN SUSTAINABILITY Analysis of the European Green Capital Award 2010 & 2011 application round 1 The authors of the European Green Capital Award 2010 & 2011 report are: Maria Berrini and Lorenzo Bono, Ambiente Italia (www.ambienteitalia.it) The report has been reviewed by the following members of the European Green Capital Award 2010 & 2011 Evaluation Panel: o Birgit Georgi European Environment Agency Indicator area(s): Sustainable land use and availability of public open areas o Matthias Ketzel Danish National Environmental Research Institute Indicator area(s): Quality of local ambient air o J. Luis Bento Coelho Instituto Superior Técnico (TU Lisbon) Indicator area(s): Noise pollution o P.J. Rudden Irish consultancy RPS Group Indicator area(s): Waste production & management o Beate Werner European Environment Agency Indicator area(s): Water consumption & Waste water management o Henrik Gudmundsson Technical University of Denmark Indicator area(s): Local mobility and passenger transportation Full responsibility for the content of the report lies with Ambiente Italia (research and consultancy, Italy). May, 2010 2 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 4 2. LOCAL CONTRIBUTION TO GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE ....................................... 7 3. LOCAL MOBILITY AND PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION ..................................... 12 4. SUSTAINABLE LAND USE AND AVAILABILITY OF LOCAL PUBLIC OPEN AREAS .. 17 5. QUALITY OF LOCAL AMBIENT AIR
    [Show full text]
  • German Resource Efficiency Programme II Programme for the Sustainable Use and Conservation of Natural Resources Imprint
    German Resource Efficiency Programme II Programme for the sustainable use and conservation of natural resources Imprint Published by Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) Public Relations Division · 11055 Berlin · Germany Email: [email protected] · Website: www.bmub.bund.de/english Edited by BMUB, Division WR III 1 Design design.idee, Büro für Gestaltung, Erfurt Printed by Druck- und Verlagshaus Zarbock GmbH & Co. KG Picture credits Titelpage: Robert Kneschke/Fotolia.com Page 6: Thomas Frey/imageBROKER/OKAPIA Page 8: euroluftbild.de/Visum Page 11: Thomas Deutschmann Page 16: industrieblick/Fotolia.com Page 34: countrypixel/Fotolia.com Page 40: Schneider Foto/Fotolia.com Page 44: by-studio/Fotolia.com Page 80: alotofpeople/Fotolia.com Page 130: katatonia/Fotolia.com Date November 2016 First Print 5,000 copies Where to order this publication Publikationsversand der Bundesregierung Postfach 48 10 09 · 18132 Rostock · Germany Tel.: +49 30 / 18 272 272 1 · Fax: +49 30 / 18 10 272 272 1 Email: [email protected] Website: www.bmub.bund.de/en/service/publications Notice This publication is part of the public relations work of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety. It is distributed free of charge and is not intended for sale. Printed on recycled paper. German Resource Efficiency Programme II Programme for the sustainable use and conservation of natural resources adopted by the Federal Cabinet on 2 March 2016 German Resource
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report on European Activities 2014 Munich and Europe Munich‘S Role in Europe 3
    Annual Report on European Activities 2014 Munich and Europe Munich‘s role in Europe 3 City Council Commission on Europe 4 After the elections: All change in Brussels and Munich 5 Strategy In demand: Munich‘s expertise In Munich, EUROCITIES strengthens the position of large cities 7 Awards for energy efficiency and sustainable power supply 9 Setting a good example 10 Local government departments contribute their expertise to EUROCITIES working groups 11 Nantes takes over EUROCITIES presidency 12 Social Forum stands up for public participation ECOPROFIT at the Economic Development Forum 13 European cities join forces to adapt to climate change News from the networks 14 New head of the Commission‘s regional representation in Munich Network meeting: Keen interest in information about Europe 16 Air pollution control: Little movement in Brussels in 2014 City Council Commission responds to planned public transport regulation 17 TTIP must not jeopardize the quality and diversity of public services 18 EU‘s Urban Agenda must respect subsidiarity 19 Balancing the needs of mobility and the environment in the Alpine space 20 We grow together – together we grow Best-practice security 21 EU Parliament gains influence 22 Committee with extended authority Setting the points for the new parliamentary term Well prepared to apply for INTERREG funds 23 A new EU funding period begins Training and development in Europe 24 Promoting openness and tolerance Applying the UN‘s Disability Rights Convention 25 Cover: Our cover picture shows a reflection of Munich‘s
    [Show full text]
  • Eco-Innovation in Smes an In-Depth Case Analysis of Transforming Smes Through Effective Partnerships
    Eco-innovation in SMEs An in-depth case analysis of transforming SMEs through effective partnerships Johanna Klewitz and Erik G. Hansen Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM) Leuphana Universität Lüneburg Scharnhorststr. 1 D-21335 Lüneburg Fax: +49-4131-677-2186 [email protected] www.leuphana.de/csm/ November 2012 ©Johanna Klewitz and Erik G. Hansen, 2012. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means: electronic, electrostatic magnetic tapes, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the permission in writing from the copyright holders. Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM) Leuphana University of Lueneburg Scharnhorststr. 1 D-21335 Lueneburg Centrum für Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement (CNM) Leuphana Universität Lüneburg Scharnhorststr. 1 D-21335 Lüneburg Tel. +49-4131-677-2181 Fax. +49-4131-677-2186 E-mail: [email protected] www.leuphana.de/csm ISBN 978-3-942638-24-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS III TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures and Tables ...................................................................................................... IV Author Biography .................................................................................................................... V Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................. V Abstract .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 27 AUT ECOPROFIT, Graz
    Subscriber: Martha Vargas, Together Foundation Subscription Expires: 01-DEC-09 ECOPROFIT, Graz Austria Categories: Urban and Regional Planning: - consultative process -localizing Agenda 21 -regional planning -regional resource planning Technology, Tools and Methods: - management tools and systems -technology transfer Economic Development: - capital formation -cooperative opportunities -enterprise development (formal and informal sectors) -training Level of Activity: Global Ecosystem: Continental Summary ECOPROFIT is a public private partnership programme for sustainable development. The name ECOPROFIT informs you about the two main targets, to find measures for reducing environmental impacts and achieve cost-savings with these measures. The practice has shown that the economic success of the programme is about 10:1 compared with the financial inputs. At first consultants and representatives of local authorities get trained at the ECOPROFIT academy of CPC Austria on location and afterwards organise workshops for companies to transfer know-how into the economy. Simultaneously these qualified employees of the companies form an internal ECOPROFIT team and find as well as implement measures in the companies together with consultants. The programme was developed in Graz by the City of Graz - Environmental Department in cooperation with the Technical University of Graz. To let other cities and regions participate in the success of ECOPROFIT the Cleaner Production Center Austria (CPC Austria) was founded. Our task is the distribution, further development and quality assurance of ECOPROFIT. At the moment there are over 1000 companies in about 50 cities of the world participating. Narrative Situation before The city of Graz with about 250.000 inhabitants is situated in a basin shape. And Graz is an important industrial area.
    [Show full text]
  • Präsentation ÖKOPROFIT – Eine Grazer Erfogsgeschichte
    16. Mai 2018 / Zürich ÖKOPROFIT – Zukunft mit verAnworten Eine Grazer Erfolgsgeschichte Mag. Julia Wild, MSc - Stadt Graz Umweltamt Mag. Christoph Holzner, CPC Austria / bit management Stadt Graz Umweltamt | Schmiedgasse 26/IV | 8011 Graz Foto: Schiffer Foto: Stadt Graz/Harry ÖKOPROFIT – eine Grazer Erfolgsgeschichte Smog-Winter 1988/1989: Foto: Stadt Graz, Umweltamt ÖKOPROFIT-Start 1991/92: . Über 200 Unternehmen . Unterschiedliche Branchen . Rund 13.000 Beratungsstunden mit ExpertInnen . Über 11.000 Umweltmaßnahmen 2 Einsparungen durch ÖKOPROFIT-Maßnahmen Programm-Jahr 2017: . Strom: 3.670 MWh . Wasser: 12.859 m³ . Wärme: 8.065 MWh 3 ÖKOPROFIT – Die Module (am Bsp. Graz) ÖKOPROFIT ÖKOPROFIT Basis Klub ÖKOPROFIT ÖKOPROFIT Mikro Mikro-Klub ÖKOPROFIT ÖKOPROFIT Tourismus Tourismus-Klub 4 ÖKOPROFIT – Der Ablauf (am Bsp. Graz) Basis-Programme (Einsteiger) Klub-Programme (Fortsetzung) . Akquise . Akquise . Workshops . Workshops . Individuelle Beratung . Arbeitsgruppen . Kommission vor Ort . Individuelle Beratung . Auszeichnung . Kommission vor Ort(alle 3 Jahre) bzw. Verkürztes Verfahren . Firmen-Insights, Netzwerk-Aktivitäten . Auszeichnung 5 ÖKOPROFIT – Die Auszeichnung Foto: Stadt Graz, Foto Fischer Grazer Orpheum, 2018 6 ÖKOPROFIT – eine österreichische Erfolgsgeschichte . Wien, Ober- u Niederösterreich, Vorarlberg, Kärnten, Burgenland und Steiermark . Mehr als 500 zertifizierte Unternehmen . Ca. 300 Zertifizierungen im Jahr 2017 (inkl. Re-Zertifizierungen) . Einsparungen im Jahr 2017 ca. € 8 Mio EUR 7 ECOPROFIT – eine weltweite Erfolgsgeschichte . Deutschland (z.Zt. ca. 50 aktive Programme) Aachen, Augsburg, Lkr. Aichach-Friedberg/Lkr.Augsburg, Region Bayrischer Untermain, Bielefeld, Bonn, Kr. Borken, Darmstadt-Dieburg, Lkr. Dillingen, Donau-Ries, Dortmund, Duisburg, Kr. Düren, Erfurt, Essen, Hamm, Hamburg, Hannover, Hildesheim, Stadt Kaiserslautern und Lkr. Kaiserslautern, Köln, Lkr. Lüneburg, Kelheim, Mainz, Minden- Lübbecke, Mülheim/Ruhr, München, Münster, Osnabrück, Kreis Recklinghausen, Lkr.
    [Show full text]
  • PET and Sustainability – a Contradiction in Terms? Sustainability Report for 2015/2016 Sustainability Report for 2015/2016
    PET and sustainability – a contradiction in terms? Sustainability report for 2015/2016 Sustainability report for 2015/2016 Sustainability report for 2015/2016 Many challenges still lie ahead, but the successes already achieved show that we are on the right path. Numerous directional milestones have already been estab- lished on the market, selected awards confirm our actions. Award-winningly German Design Award Switch to green electricity innovative honors sustainability Since 2016 the entire KHS Group has been using only hydroelectric KHS subsidiary NMP Systems wins In 2015 we had the great honor of power at all of its German the 2016 German Design Award being named one of the most production sites. This enabled us to for outstanding communication June 2015 innovative companies in Germany. November 2015 January 2016 cut our CO emissions by around design and sustainable packaging 2 At the German SME Summit we 9,000 metric tons in 2016. This for its Nature MultiPack™ und were presented with the Top 100 significant reduction also has a Direct Print Powered by KHS™ Award for our successful innovati- positive impact on the carbon packaging systems. on management. This award pays footprint left by products manufac- homage to the great importance tured by KHS GmbH. we attach to innovative ideas and developments – and here particu- larly from initial employee develop- ment to the launch of the matured product to market. 2 Sustainability report for 2015/2016 Sustainable mobility Line optimization winner Management expertise ensured In 2016 we were distinguished by At the 2016 Enterprise Mobility German minster for the environ- Summit KHS won a prize in the ment Barbara Hendriks for our Business Process Mobilization In 2016 we set down the terms participation in the Mobil.Pro.Fit category for its successful digitizati- governing the development of our September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 sustainability campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • IMPEL Workshop on the Use of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Industrial Plants March 13 to 16, 2000, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria
    ,03(/ 1(7:25. European Union Network for the Implementation and Enforcement of Environmental Law IMPEL Workshop on the Use of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Industrial Plants March 13 to 16, 2000, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria ),1$/5(3257 Edited by: Bruno WACHTER CENTRIC AUSTRIA - Carinthian Environmental Training and Infrastructure Center and Wolfgang HAFNER Government of Carinthia .ODJHQIXUW-XQH IMPEL Workshop on the Use of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Industrial Plants March 13-16, 2000, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria IMPEL Workshop on the Use of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Industrial Plants March 13 to 16, 2000, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria ),1$/5(3257 (GLWRUV Bruno WACHTER, CENTRIC AUSTRIA and Wolfgang HAFNER; Government of Carinthia 3URMHFW0DQDJHUV Wolfgang HAFNER and Karin MIKLAUTSCH, Government of Carinthia 0DLQ2UJDQLVHUV Gerhard WEIHS, CENTRIC AUSTRIA &RQWUDFW1XPEHU Subv. 99/66788 7KLVSURMHFWUHIHUVWR IMPEL – European Network for the Implementation and Enforcement of Environmental Law 6XSSRUWE\ European Commission Austrian Federal Ministry of Environment, Youth and Family Affairs Austrian Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs Government of the Province of Carinthia .ODJHQIXUW-XQH Any technical enquires relating to this project should be referred to: • Wolfgang HAFNER; Government of Carinthia, Dept 15 - Environment; A-9020 Klagenfurt, Flatschacherstrasse 70; Tel.: +43/463/536/31546; Fax: +43/463/536/31500; Email: [email protected] • Karin MIKLAUTSCH; Government of Carinthia, Dept 8W; A-9020 Klagenfurt, Miesstalerstrasse 1; Tel.:
    [Show full text]
  • Gebr. Heinemann 2017 / 2018 Inspire Performance
    Think and rethink Corporate Responsibility initiatives at Gebr. Heinemann 2017 / 2018 EDITORIAL 102 -14 GRI 3 Page 8 1 / Think and rethink: The many facets of sustainability In a key milestone for Gebr. Heinemann, our company is about to make, for the first time in its 140-year history, a number of major, organisation-wide structural changes aimed at further increasing our global agility. The compa- ny is co-managed by members of the Heinemann fami- Responsibility Report Heinemann Corporate 2017 Gebr. ly, with Claus Heinemann and Gunnar Heinemann as owners, and Max Heinemann, the son of Gunnar Heinemann, as Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Together, they represent the fourth and fifth generations, respec- tively, of family members at the helm. The other members of the company’s executive management are Chief Operating Officer (COO) Raoul Spanger, Chief Commercial Officer (CCO) Kay Spanger and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Stephan Ernst. Whatever changes the company makes, the strategic foundations of our success will continue to be global growth, smart synergies and that quint- essential expression of our family company’s DNA: sustainability, in all of its many facets. Our aim is to be even more responsive to the market, fast- er and more efficient, and to be the preferred travel retail alternative wher- ever sustainability matters. Owning and mastering the global challenges of tomorrow is going to require a complete rethink of how we do business, as we reinvent ourselves and renew our approach to sustainability. The title of this Corporate Responsibility Report is therefore “Think and rethink”. The multiple facets of our business, which brings together more than 70 differ- ent cultures in Germany alone and includes Duty Free shops in around 40 countries, represent a wealth of opportunities while, at the same time, posing special challenges in terms of corporate responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • World's 1St in Green Tech
    st World's 1 in Green Tech Leading technologies from the Green Tech Cluster, Austria RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT Biomass technology (BIOENERGY 2020+, p21) Energy systems (Graz University of Technology, p25; FH JOANNEUM, p24; Montanuniversität Leoben, p28) Solar energy (AEE INTEC, p20; JOANNEUM RESEARCH, p27; PCCL, p29) PRODUCTION Battery storage systems (AccuPower, p35; E2T, p68; Ökosolar, p129) BioDiesel plants (BDI, p47; Christof Industries, p55) Biogas additives (IPUS, p106; Schaumann BioEnergy, p148) Biogas plants (BDI, p47) Biomass boilers (BINDER, p50; KWB, p113; Perhofer, p131) Biomass plants (ANDRITZ, p40; Christof Industries, p55) Control systems for biomass, biogas & district heating (AEt Rebernegg, p39; CTB, p59) Gas storage membrane (Sattler, p151) Hydro power plants (ANDRITZ, p40; doro turbinen, p64) Hydrogen production (Rouge H2, p145) Infrared heating (Green Tech Solutions, p98; Redwell, p140) Mobile photovoltaic systems (HBT Energietechnik, p101; PV-Styria, p138) Photovoltaic modules (PVP Photovoltaic, p137; SFL, p155) Photovoltaics backsheets (Isovoltaic, p109) Smart grids (Siemens, p159) Solar thermal systems (MSG MySolar, p120; Pink, p132; S.O.L.I.D., p161) Surface heating systems (ATT, p45) GREEN ENERGY GREEN Transformers (Siemens, p159) Wind generators (ELIN, p75) ENGINEERING & SERVICE Biomass combustion technology (BIOS, p51; Combustion Bay One, p56) District heating power plants (nahwaerme.at, p124) Energy service provider (Energie Graz, p79; Energie Steiermark, p80) Photovoltaic systems installation (E1, p65; eco-tec.at,
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Report North Rhine - Westphalia
    TPM Territorial Performance Monitoring Annexes Regional Report North Rhine - Westphalia Targeted Analysis 2013/02/13 Draft final Report | Version 27 February 2012 This report presents the interim results of a Targeted Analysis conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2013 Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The partnership behind the ESPON Programme consists of the EU Commission and the Member States of the EU27, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. Each partner is represented in the ESPON Monitoring Committee. This report does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the Monitoring Committee. Information on the ESPON Programme and projects can be found on www.espon.eu The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This basic report exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON & IGEAT, 2012 Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON Coordination Unit in Luxembourg. ESPON Territorial Performance Monitoring (TPM) Regional Report Project Partner 5 North Rhine-Westphalia Index List of abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................... iii List of figures .................................................................................................................................................... iv List of
    [Show full text]