DOCSLIB.ORG

OPCW Conference of the States Parties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

OPCW Conference of the States Parties Eighteenth Session C-18/INF.3/Rev.1 2 – 5 December 2013 5 December 2013 ENGLISH only LIST OF PARTICIPANTS OF THE EIGHTEENTH SESSION OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE STATES PARTIES A. STATES PARTIES AFGHANISTAN Representative H.E. Mr Enayatullah Nabiel Permanent Representative to the OPCW Ambassador, Permanent Representation of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Mr Azizullah Rasoully First Secretary, Permanent Representation of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan to the OPCW, The Hague ALBANIA Representative H.E. Mr Gazmend Barbullushi Permanent Representative to the OPCW Ambassador, Permanent Representation of the Republic of Albania to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Mrs Xhulieta Keko Minister-Counsellor, Permanent Representation of the Republic of Albania to the OPCW, The Hague ALGERIA Representative H.E. Mrs Nassima Baghli Permanent Representative to the OPCW Ambassador, Permanent Representation of the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Mr Missoum Ramla Executive Secretary, National Authority of the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria, Algiers CS-2014-8335(E) distributed 16/01/2014 *CS-2014-8335.E* C-18/INF.3/Rev.1 page 2 Alternate Mr Sofiane Fernani Director, Ministry of Energy and Mining, the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria, Algiers Alternate Mr Mustapha Abbani Chief of Cabinet, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria, Algiers Alternate Mr Farouk Benmokhtar Second Secretary, Permanent Representation of the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Mr Mourad Dahmani Attaché, Permanent Representation of the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Ms Ikram Zouad Attaché, Permanent Representation of the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria to the OPCW, The Hague ANDORRA Representative H.E. Ms Eva Descarrega Garcia Permanent Representative to the OPCW Ambassador, Permanent Representation of the Principality of Andorra to the OPCW, Brussels Alternate Mr Xavier Trota Bollo Counsellor to the Ambassador, Permanent Representation of the Principality of Andorra to the OPCW, Brussels Alternate Mr Jeroni X. Estupiñán Pascual Second Secretary, Permanent Representation of the Principality of Andorra to the OPCW, Brussels ARGENTINA Representative H.E. Mr Héctor Horacio Salvador Permanent Representative to the OPCW Ambassador, Permanent Representation of the Argentine Republic to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Mr Gustavo Ainchil Minister, Permanent Representation of the Argentine Republic to the OPCW, The Hague C-18/INF.3/Rev.1 page 3 Alternate Mr Luis Pablo Maria Beltramino Minister, Permanent Representation of the Argentine Republic to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Mr Gustavo Zlauvinen Minister, Permanent Representation of the Argentine Republic to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Mr Nicolas Francisco Vidal Counsellor, Permanent Representation of the Argentine Republic to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Mr Carlos Ravazzola Ministry of Defense of the Argentine Republic, Buenos Aires ARMENIA Representative H.E. Ms Dziunik Aghajanian Permanent Representative to the OPCW Ambassador, Permanent Representation of the Republic of Armenia to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Mr Gevorg Petrossian Minister-Counsellor, Permanent Representation of the Republic of Armenia to the OPCW, The Hague AUSTRALIA Representative H.E. Mr Neil Mules Permanent Representative to the OPCW Ambassador, Permanent Representation of Australia to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Ms Anne Craig First Secretary, Permanent Representation of Australia to the OPCW, The Hague Adviser Mr Lewis Casey Research Officer, Permanent Representation of Australia to the OPCW, The Hague Adviser Ms Heather Chai Executive Officer, Arms Control Branch, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Canberra Adviser Dr Josy Meyer Director, CWC Implementation Section, Australian Safeguards and Non-Proliferation Office, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Canberra C-18/INF.3/Rev.1 page 4 Adviser Mr Robert Mathews Head, NBC Arms Control Unit, DSTO, Canberra AUSTRIA Representative H.E. Mr Werner Druml Permanent Representative to the OPCW Ambassador, Permanent Representation of the Republic of Austria to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Mr Karl Lebeda National Authority for the CWC and BTWC Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth of the Republic of Austria, Vienna Alternate Mr Robert Gerschner Minister, Head, Conventional, Chemical, and Biological Weapons, Department for Disarmament, Arms Control and Non-proliferation, Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs of the Republic of Austria, Vienna Alternate Mrs Adelheid Folie Minister, Permanent Representation of the Republic of Austria to the OPCW, The Hague Adviser Mr Adolf Brückler Colonel, Federal Ministry of Defense and Sports of the Republic of Austria, Vienna Adviser Mr Erich Krumpl Colonel, Federal Ministry of Defense and Sports of the Republic of Austria, Vienna AZERBAIJAN Representative H.E. Mr Mir-Hamza Efendiyev Permanent Representative to the OPCW Ambassador, Permanent Representation of the Republic of Azerbaijan to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Mr Aliyev Sardar Chief of Chemical Service, Ministry of Internal Affairs, Baku Adviser Mr Anar Mutallimov Third Secretary, Permanent Representation of the Republic of Azerbaijan to the OPCW, The Hague C-18/INF.3/Rev.1 page 5 BAHRAIN Representative Mr Sameer Ahmed Alzayany Vice Chairman of the National Authority, Colonel Military Justice, Bahrain Defense Force, Manama Alternate Mr Ahmed Almuharraqy First Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Bahrain, Manama Alternate Mrs Fatima Abdulla AlDhaen Counsellor, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Bahrain, Manama Adviser Mr Abdulla Abdullatif Abdulla Chairman, Undersecretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Bahrain, Manama Adviser Mr Merza Khalaf Supreme Council of Environment, Manama Adviser Mr Jassim Almehza Doctor, Ministry of Health of the Kingdom of Bahrain, Manama Adviser Mr Najeeb Alboloshy Customs Officer, Customs Affairs, Manama BANGLADESH Representative Mrs Ishrat Jahan Charge d’Affaires a.i., Permanent Representation of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh to the OPCW, The Hague BELARUS Representative H.E. Mr Aleksandr Mikhnevich First Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Belarus, Minsk Alternate H.E. Mrs Elena Gritsenko Permanent Representative to the OPCW Ambassador, Permanent Representation of the Republic of Belarus to the OPCW, The Hague Adviser Mr Aleksandr Ponomarev Deputy Head of International Security and Arms Control Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Minsk C-18/INF.3/Rev.1 page 6 BELGIUM Representative H.E. Mr Willy De Buck Permanent Representative to the OPCW Ambassador, Permanent Representation of the Kingdom of Belgium to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Mr Geoffrey Eekhout First Secretary, Permanent Representation of the Kingdom of Belgium to the OPCW, The Hague BENIN Representative H.E. Mr Charles Borromée Todjinou Permanent Representative to the OPCW Ambassador, Permanent Representation of Benin to the OPCW, Brussels Alternate Mr Guy Hode Minister-Counsellor, Permanent Representation of Benin to the OPCW, Brussels BHUTAN Representative H.E. Mr Sonam Tshong Permanent Representative to the OPCW Ambassador, Permanent Representation of the Kingdom of Bhutan to the OPCW, Brussels Alternate Ms Ugen Chozom Counsellor, Permanent Representation of the Kingdom of Bhutan to the OPCW, Brussels BOLIVIA (PLURINATIONAL STATE OF) Representative H.E. Mr Eduardo Rodriguez Veltzé Permanent Representative to the OPCW Ambassador, Permanent Representation of the Plurinational State of Bolivia to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Mr Farit Rojas Tudela Minister-Counsellor, Permanent Representation of the Plurinational State of Bolivia to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Mrs Rimac B. Zubieta Gambarte First Secretary, Permanent Representation of the Plurinational State of Bolivia to the OPCW, The Hague C-18/INF.3/Rev.1 page 7 Alternate Ms Lola Sillerico Aliaga Second Secretary, Permanent Representation of the Plurinational State of Bolivia to the OPCW, The Hague Adviser Mr Lucio Orlando Tambo Cespedes Ministry of Defense of the Plurinational State of Bolivia, Sucre BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Representative H.E. Mr Ahmet Halilovic Permanent Representative to the OPCW Ambassador, Permanent Representation of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Mr Marko Knezevic Second Secretary, Permanent Representation of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the OPCW, The Hague BRAZIL Representative H.E. Mr Piragibe dos Santos Tarrago Permanent Representative to the OPCW Ambassador, Permanent Representation of the Federative Republic of Brazil to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Ms Elizabeth-Sophie Mazzella di Bosco Balsa Minister-Counsellor, Permanent Representation of the Federative Republic of Brazil to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Ms Maité de Souza Schmitz First Secretary, Permanent Representation of the Federative Republic of Brazil to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Ms Vanessa Sant’Anna Bonifácio Tavares Second Secretary, Permanent Representation of the Federative Republic of Brazil to the OPCW, The Hague Alternate Col. Mr Paolo Malizia Head, National Defense Division of the Federative Republic of Brazil, Rio de Janeiro BULGARIA Representative H.E. Mr Nikola Kolev Permanent Representative to the OPCW Ambassador, Permanent Representation of the Republic of Bulgaria to the OPCW, The
Recommended publications
  • General Assembly UNEDITED VERSION

    General Assembly UNEDITED VERSION

    United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/33/L.6 General Assembly Distr.: Limited 10 May 2019 Original: English UNEDITED VERSION Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty-third session Geneva, 6-17 May 2019 Draft report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review* Bhutan * The annex is being circulated without formal editing, in the language of submission only. GE. A/HRC/WG.6/33/L.6 Introduction 1. The Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, established in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 5/1, held its thirty-third session from 6 to 17 May 2019. The review of Bhutan was held at the 6th meeting, on 8 May 2019. The delegation of Bhutan was headed by Minister for Foreign Affairs, Mr. Tandi Dorji. At its 10th meeting, held on 10 May 2019, the Working Group adopted the report on Bhutan. 2. On 15 January 2019, the Human Rights Council selected the following group of rapporteurs (troika) to facilitate the review of Bhutan: Argentina, Austria and Bahrain. 3. In accordance with paragraph 15 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 5/1 and paragraph 5 of the annex to Council resolution 16/21, the following documents were issued for the review of Bhutan: (a) A national report submitted/written presentation made in accordance with paragraph 15 (a) (A/HRC/WG.6/33/BTN/1); (b) A compilation prepared by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in accordance with paragraph 15 (b) (A/HRC/WG.6/33/BTN/2); (c) A summary prepared by OHCHR in accordance with paragraph 15 (c) (A/HRC/WG.6/33/ BTN/3).
  • State Responsibilities in Combating Trafficking in Persons in Central Asia, 27 Loy

    State Responsibilities in Combating Trafficking in Persons in Central Asia, 27 Loy

    Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review Volume 27 Number 2 Article 1 3-1-2005 State Responsibilities in Combating Trafficking inersons P in Central Asia Mohamed Y. Mattar Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Mohamed Y. Mattar, State Responsibilities in Combating Trafficking in Persons in Central Asia, 27 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 145 (2005). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol27/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. State Responsibilities in Combating Trafficking in Persons in Central Asia MOHAMED Y. MATAR* I. INTRODUCTION Since the early 1990s, trafficking in persons has been among the major human rights problems in the transition countries of Central and Eastern Europe. In more recent years, however, "the focus of human traffickers ha[s] shifted to... Central Asia, a region fraught with social, political, and economic tension."' Existing research on the issue suggests that the fastest growth rates of trafficking are currently observed in the former Soviet Union, including Central Asia,2 and estimates that the region "is becoming the most important geographical source of trafficking in women in Asia."3 Further, trafficking in persons is a significant problem in the Central Asian countries of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, * Mohamed Y.
  • A/HRC/42/8 General Assembly

    A/HRC/42/8 General Assembly

    United Nations A/HRC/42/8 General Assembly Distr.: General 3 July 2019 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty-second session 9–27 September 2019 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review* Bhutan * The annex is being circulated without formal editing, in the language of submission only. GE.19-11259(E) A/HRC/42/8 Introduction 1. The Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, established in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 5/1, held its thirty-third session from 6 to 17 May 2019. The review of Bhutan was held at the 6th meeting, on 8 May 2019. The delegation of Bhutan was headed by the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Tandi Dorji. At its 10th meeting, held on 10 May 2019, the Working Group adopted the report on Bhutan. 2. On 15 January 2019, the Human Rights Council selected the following group of rapporteurs (troika) to facilitate the review of Bhutan: Argentina, Austria and Bahrain. 3. In accordance with paragraph 15 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 5/1 and paragraph 5 of the annex to Council resolution 16/21, the following documents were issued for the review of Bhutan: (a) A national report submitted/written presentation made in accordance with paragraph 15 (a) (A/HRC/WG.6/33/BTN/1); (b) A compilation prepared by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in accordance with paragraph 15 (b) (A/HRC/WG.6/33/BTN/2); (c) A summary prepared by OHCHR in accordance with paragraph 15 (c) (A/HRC/WG.6/33/BTN/3).
  • RUSSIA and CHINA and Central Asia Programme at ISPI

    RUSSIA and CHINA and Central Asia Programme at ISPI

    RUSSIA AND CHINA. ANATOMY OF A A PARTNERSHIP OF AND RUSSIA CHINA. ANATOMY Aldo Ferrari While the “decline of the West” is now almost taken is Head of the Russia, Caucasus for granted, China’s impressive economic performance RUSSIA AND CHINA and Central Asia Programme at ISPI. and the political influence of an assertive Russia in the international arena are combining to make Eurasia a key Founded in 1934, ISPI is Eleonora Tafuro Ambrosetti Anatomy of a Partnership hub of political and economic power. That, certainly, an independent think tank is a Research Fellow committed to the study of is the story which Beijing and Moscow have been telling at the Russia, Caucasus and international political and Central Asia Centre at ISPI. for years. edited by Aldo Ferrari and Eleonora Tafuro Ambrosetti economic dynamics. Are the times ripe for a “Eurasian world order”? What It is the only Italian Institute exactly does the supposed Sino-Russian challenge to introduction by Paolo Magri – and one of the very few in the liberal world entail? Are the two countries’ worsening Europe – to combine research clashes with the West drawing them closer together? activities with a significant This ISPI Report tackles every aspect of the apparently commitment to training, events, solidifying alliance between Moscow and Beijing, but also and global risk analysis for points out its growing asymmetries. It also recommends companies and institutions. some policies that could help the EU to deal with this ISPI favours an interdisciplinary “Eurasian shift”, a long-term and multi-faceted power and policy-oriented approach made possible by a research readjustment that may lead to the end of the world team of over 50 analysts and as we have known it.
  • Russia's Foreign Policy: Key Regions and Issues

    Russia's Foreign Policy: Key Regions and Issues

    Forschungsstelle Osteuropa Bremen Arbeitspapiere und Materialien No. 87 – November 2007 Russia's Foreign Policy: Key Regions and Issues Edited by Robert Orttung, Jeronim Perovic, Heiko Pleines, Hans-Henning Schröder Forschungsstelle Osteuropa an der Universität Bremen Klagenfurter Straße 3, D-28359 Bremen Tel. +49 421 218-3687, Fax +49 421 218-3269 http://www.forschungsstelle.uni-bremen.de Arbeitspapiere und Materialien – Forschungsstelle Osteuropa, Bremen Working Papers of the Research Centre for East European Studies, Bremen No. 87: Robert Orttung, Jeronim Perovic, Heiko Pleines, Hans-Henning Schröder (eds.): Russia’s Foreign Policy: Key Regions and Issues November 2007 ISSN: 1616-7384 All contributions in this Working Paper are reprints from the Russian Analytical Digest. About the Russian Analytical Digest: The Russian Analytical Digest is a bi-weekly internet publication which is jointly produced by the Research Centre for East European Studies [Forschungsstelle Osteuropa] at the University of Bremen (www.forschungsstelle.uni-bremen.de) and the Center for Security Studies (CSS) at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zurich) (www.css.ethz.ch). It is supported by the Otto-Wolff-Foundation and the German Association for East European Studies (DGO). The Digest draws from contributions to the German-language Russlandanalysen, the CSS analytical network Russian and Eurasian Security Network (RES) and the Russian Regional Report. For a free subscription and for back issues please visit the Russian Analytical Digest website at www.res.ethz.ch/analysis/rad Technical Editor: Matthias Neumann Cover based on a work of art by Nicholas Bodde Opinions expressed in publications of the Research Centre for East European Studies are solely those of the authors.
  • List of Participants

    List of Participants

    GC(42)/INF/13/Rev. 3 International Atomic Energy Agency 25 September 1998 GENERAL Distr. GENERAL CONFERENCE ENGLISH only Forty-second regular session Vienna, 21-25 September 1998 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Information received by 7 .00 p.m. on 24 September 1998 CONTENTS 1. MEMBER STATES 1-70 2. REPRESENTATION OF STATES NOT MEMBERS OF THE AGENCY AND OF OTHER ORGANISATIONS 71-81 An asterisk following a name indicates that the participant's spouse is present in Vienna. PLEASE NOTE THAT TITLES PROVIDED IN FRENCH AND SPANISH HAVE BEEN INFORMALLY TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH BY THE SECRETARIAT. 1. MEMBER STATES AFGHANISTAN Delegate: Mr. Farid A. AMIN Acting Resident Representative to the Agency ALBANIA Delegate: Mr. Spiro KOÇI First Secretary Alternate to the Resident Representative Alternate: Mr. Robert KUSHE Director Institute of Nuclear Physics, Tirana ALGERIA Delegate: Mr. Abderrahmane KADRİ Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission Head of the Delegation Advisers: Mr. Mokhtar REGUIEG Ambassador to Austria Resident Representative to the Agency Mr. El Arbi ALIOUA Counsellor Atomic Energy Commission Mr. Mohamed CHIKOUCHE Counsellor Atomic Energy Commission Mr. Salah DJEFFAL Director Center for Radiation Protection and Security (CRS) Mr. YoussefTOUIL Director Center for Development of Nuclear Technologies (CDTN) Mr. Ali AISSAOUI Counsellor Atomic Energy Commission Mr. Abdelmadjid DRAIA Counsellor Permanent Mission in Vienna Mr. Boualem CHEBIHI Counsellor, Ministry of Foreign Affairs ARGENTINA Delegate: Mr. Juan Carlos KRECKLER Ambassador to Austria Designated Resident Representative to the Agency Alternates: Mr. Dan BENINSON President of the Board Nuclear Regulatory Authority (ARN) Alternate to the Governor Mr. Pedro VILLAGRA DELGADO Director, International Security Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Trade and Worship Alternate to the Governor Mr.
  • High Treason: Essays on the History of the Red Army 1918-1938, Volume II

    High Treason: Essays on the History of the Red Army 1918-1938, Volume II

    FINAL REPORT T O NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARCH TITLE : HIG H TREASON: ESSAYS ON THE HISTORY OF TH E RED ARMY 1918-193 8 VOLUME I I AUTHOR . VITALY RAPOPOR T YURI ALEXEE V CONTRACTOR : CENTER FOR PLANNING AND RESEARCH, .INC . R . K . LAURINO, PROJECT DIRECTO R PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : VLADIMIR TREML, CHIEF EDITO R BRUCE ADAMS, TRANSLATOR - EDITO R COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 626- 3 The work leading to this report was supported in whole or i n part from funds provided by the National Council for Sovie t and East European Research . HIGH TREASO N Essays in the History of the Red Army 1918-1938 Volume I I Authors : Vitaly N . Rapopor t an d Yuri Alexeev (pseudonym ) Chief Editor : Vladimir Trem l Translator and Co-Editor : Bruce Adam s June 11, 198 4 Integrative Analysis Project o f The Center for Planning and Research, Inc . Work on this Project supported by : Tte Defense Intelligence Agency (Contract DNA001-80-C-0333 ) an d The National Council for Soviet and East European Studies (Contract 626-3) PART FOU R CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE RKK A Up to now we have spoken of Caligula as a princeps . It remains to discuss him as a monster . Suetoniu s There is a commandment to forgive our enemies , but there is no commandment to forgive our friends . L . Medic i Some comrades think that repression is the main thing in th e advance of socialism, and if repression does not Increase , there is no advance . Is that so? Of course it is not so .
  • Kazakh President Addresses Global Issues in Astana Club Speech AIFC, Green Tech Centre and IT Start-Up Hub to Begin Operating

    Kazakh President Addresses Global Issues in Astana Club Speech AIFC, Green Tech Centre and IT Start-Up Hub to Begin Operating

    0° / -6°C WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2017 No 22 (136) www.astanatimes.com Kazakh President addresses global Nazarbayev, Putin discuss issues in Astana Club speech developing human capital at interregional forum “Experts forecast that by 2030, By Aigerim Seisembayeva about 60 professions in various spheres will vanish, and more than ASTANA – A number of inter- 180 new ones will emerge. Accord- state, intergovernmental, regional ing to the Human Development and commercial documents were Report, in the next five years, more signed Nov. 9 at the 14th Forum of than a third of knowledge and skills Interregional Cooperation between necessary for work will change. Kazakhstan and Russia in Chely- This is a serious challenge, and its abinsk. Visiting Kazakh President solution should become one of our Nursultan Nazarbayev and his cooperation’s top priorities,” he Russian counterpart Vladimir Pu- said, adding that it is important to tin also signed a joint statement develop human capital in educa- devoted to the 25th anniversary of tion, health and social protection. diplomatic relations between the “To date, more than 30 Ka- two states (Oct. 22, 1992). zakh universities conduct joint “Our interregional cooperation is scientific research with Russian the basis of economic interaction, universities. I propose to create President Nursultan Nazarbayev (C) speaks to the politicians and experts in Astana on Nov. 13, flanked by Parliament Senate Chairman Kassym-Jomart Tokayev (L) and Institute of World Economy and Politics Director Yerzhan Saltybayev. which, despite all the difficulties, is Kazakh-Russian scientific con- growing. In the past nine months, our sortiums in promising areas, such trade turnover grew 31 percent.
  • Osce Conflict Management in Central Asia Fighting Windmills Like Don Quixote

    Osce Conflict Management in Central Asia Fighting Windmills Like Don Quixote

    security and human rights 27 (2016) 479-497 brill.com/shrs osce Conflict Management in Central Asia Fighting Windmills like Don Quixote Pál Dunay Professor of nato and European Security Issues, George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies in Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany Abstract Conflicts and their management in Central Asia have never been prioritised by the osce although five states of the region are among its participating states. This has been due to that unlike in some other parts of the post-Soviet space most of the con- flicts did not threaten with military escalation, and the intensity of strategic rivalry is less noticeable in this distant part of the osce area than closer to the heart of E urope. The fact Russia is not a direct party to the conflicts in Central Asia also reduces the interests of many participating states. There was one high intensity conflict in the re- gion, the Tajik civil war that came too early for the osce. Lower intensity conflicts, ranging from border skirmishes, disputes about access to water, violation of rights of national minority groups, rigged elections are monitored and their resolutions are fa- cilitated by the organisation. Some of them, like the 2010 Kyrgyz-Uzbek conflict had such short shelf-life internationally that no consensus-based inter-governmental organisation could have effectively intervened into it. The osce has been successful in conflict management when the party or parties also wanted to break the stale-mate that the Organization could facilitate. Domestic change in some Central Asian states is essential for advancing the osces cooperative security approach.
  • RUSSIAN SOCIALIST FEDERATIVE SOVIET REPUBLIC Quadrumvirate: Anatolian Wars, 1919 Chaired by Amy Guo

    RUSSIAN SOCIALIST FEDERATIVE SOVIET REPUBLIC Quadrumvirate: Anatolian Wars, 1919 Chaired by Amy Guo

    RUSSIAN SOCIALIST FEDERATIVE SOVIET REPUBLIC Quadrumvirate: Anatolian Wars, 1919 Chaired by Amy Guo Session XXII Russian Socialist Federative Soviet Republic Quadrumvirate: Anatolian Wars, 1919 Topic A: Securing National Stability and Combating Anti­Communist Sentiment Topic B : Reforming the Russian State as a Dominant Global Power Committee Overview The security of the country and the Communist party will be determined by It is the year 1919, and the Russian your successes or failures as a committee. Empire is in great disorder following the aftermath of World War I. While other Allied powers are thriving both politically Parliamentary Procedure and economically, the monarchy entered Standard MUN parliamentary the war at a time when it was unprepared procedure will be adhered to in this and unstable, ultimately leading to the committee, but may be altered at the downfall of Soviet Russia. Under the discretion of the chair. Delegates in this leadership of Vladimir Lenin and his committee have certain abilities and powers Bolshevik revolutionaries, the Russian that can greatly affect debate, and Empire has now disintegrated to become subsequently, the course of events. This the Russian Socialist Federative Soviet committee will be following procedures Republic. However, opposing forces pose similar to that of the General Assemblies, significant threats to the first socialist which includes maintaining a speaker’s list republic. and having moderated and unmoderated This committee, composed of caucuses. However, there will be a variety twenty­one of Lenin’s trusted officials and of crises that will require the use of comrades, must work diligently and directives, communiqués, press releases, strategically to retain the power in the and portfolio requests.
  • Eurasianism and the Concept of Central Caucaso-Asia

    Eurasianism and the Concept of Central Caucaso-Asia

    Eurasianism and the Concept of Central Caucaso-Asia The Current State of the Eurasianist Trend of the Russian Geopolitical School Eurasianism as a geopolitical theory developed back in the 1920s, but it has even deeper historical roots in Russia.1 The Eurasianist trend of the Russian geopolitical school helps to justify Russia’s historically developed imperial ambitions2 of dominating the center of the geographical continent, Eurasia. For the Eurasianists, Russia should either be a “Eurasian nation,”3 a “great nation,” that is, “an empire,” or nothing at all.4 For them “Russia is inconceivable without an empire.”5 It comes as no surprise that despite their disparagement of Marxist dogmas, atheism, and materialism, Eurasianists welcomed the establishment of the Soviet system. The Soviet system significantly augmented Russia’s power and territory,6 which made possible for them to propose ways for the Soviet Union to evolve7 into a Eurasian 1 For example, G. Gloveli, “Geopoliticheskaia ekonomia v Rossii” [Geopolitical Economy in Russia], Voprosy ekonomiki [Economic Affairs], No. 11 (2000), pp. 46-63; Igor’ Panarin, Informatsionnaia voyna, pp. 34-64. 2 For example, Philip Longworth, Russia’s Empires. Their Rise and Fall: From Prehistory to Putin (London: John Murray, 2005). 3 L.N. Gumilev, “Skazhu vam po sekretu, chto esli Rossiia budet spasena, to tol’ko kak evraziyskaia derzhava” [To Tell You a Secret, Russia Can Only Be Saved As a Eurasian Nation], in А. Dugin, ed., Osnovy Evraziystva, p. 482; Gumilev, Ritmy Evrazii, p. 30. 4 A.G. Dugin, “Rossiia mozhet byt’ ili velikoy ili nikakoy” [Russia Can Either Be Great or Nothing At All], in А.
  • Uzbekistan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests

    Uzbekistan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests

    Order Code RS21238 Updated August 27, 2008 Uzbekistan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests Jim Nichol Specialist in Russian and Eurasian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary Uzbekistan is a potential Central Asian regional power by virtue of its relatively large population, energy and other resources, and location in the heart of the region. It has failed to make progress in economic and political reforms, and many observers criticize its human rights record. This report discusses U.S. policy and assistance. Basic facts and biographical information are provided. This report may be updated. Related products include CRS Report RL33458, Central Asia: Regional Developments and Implications for U.S. Interests. U.S. Policy According to the Administration, “it is in the U.S. and Uzbekistan’s interest to promote democracy, respect for human rights, territorial integrity, and the transition to a market-based economy in order to bolster greater social and political stability.” However, the Uzbek government’s continued “repression of civil society, religious groups, and political opposition [decreases] options for U.S. assistance.”1 Cumulative U.S. assistance budgeted for Uzbekistan in FY1992-FY2007 was $845.5 million (FREEDOM Support Act and agency budgets). In FY2008, estimated budgeted assistance was $10.19 million, and the Administration has requested $7.94 million for FY2009 (FREEDOM Support Act and other Function 150 foreign aid, excluding Defense and Energy Department funds). The main priorities of U.S. assistance requested for FY2009 are planned to be democratization, healthcare, and agricultural reforms. Plans for FY2009 include support for local groups, lawyers, and 1 U.S.