DOCSLIB.ORG

Protecting Virginia Snappers! SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2019 Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Protecting Virginia Snappers! SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2019 Contents SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2019 FOUR DOLLARS Inside: Protecting Virginia Snappers! SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2019 Contents New Regulations To Protect Virginia’s Snapping Turtles 5 By Jo Ann Abell Declining snapping turtle populations called for protective measures. In Pursuit of the Mystery Marsh Bird 11 By John Shtogren A kayak can offer a stealthy option when hunting for the elusive rail. 18 Virginia’s “New” Smith River By Bruce Ingram Trophy trout abound in these productive tailwaters. 22 Fox Squirrels on the Rebound By Ken Perrotte Expanding populations of fox squirrels offer new hunting opportunities around the state. 2020 Trout Program Maps 28 By Jay Kapalczynski Fisheries biologists share the latest trout fishing locations. 34 Window on the Marsh By B.I. Bell A thoughtful gift awakens memories of cherished times. DEPARTMENTS 36 Out & About • 40 Working Together • 42 Off the Leash 43 A Walk in the Woods • 44 Photo Tips 45 Let’s Grow Native • 46 Fare Game Cover: J.D. Kleopfer poses with a common snapping turtle. Page 5. © Meghan Marchetti Left: Fall is a great time to angle for trout, such as these native brookies. Page 28. © Sean Landsman/Engbretson Underwater Photography Back Cover: Clapper rails offer an exciting challenge to hunters. Page 11. © Bob Schamerhorn Virginia Wildlife magazine is ONLY $12.95 a year! To subscribe go online at www.dgif.virginia.gov/virginia-wildlife. Commonwealth of Virginia Ralph S. Northam, Governor HUNTING & FISHING LICENSE FEES Subsidized this publication s the recently named Executive Director of the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries Secretary of Natural Resources A Matthew J. Strickler New (DGIF), I would like to take the time to introduce myself to the loyal readers of Virginia Wildlife magazine who have Department of Game and Inland Fisheries helped to support this fine publication over time. Having Ryan J. Brown grown up on a family farm in central Virginia, I have his- Executive Director RegulatioNs torically spent my free time in the great outdoors and, along To Protect the way, Virginia Wildlife has been a valuable guide to some Members of the Board incredible hunting and fishing memories. Mamie A. Parker, Ph.D., Chair, Dulles Much like DGIF’s mission of conserving, connecting, John W. Daniel II, Vice­Chair, Richmond Virginia’s Snapping Turtles Ryan J. Brown Leon Boyd, Vansant Executive Director and protecting Virginia’s wildlife resources, my passion and Nicole S. Butterworth, Vinton career goals have always focused on conservation. The op- H.S. Caudill, North Tazewell portunity to rejoin the dedicated professionals of DGIF and Catherine H. Claiborne, Richmond Douglas Dear, Syria to help fulfill that mission is a dream come true. Hunting, fishing, and other wildlife-based Karen Terwilliger, Locustville recreation are not simply hobbies, but my way of life, and I look forward to working with our Brian Vincent, Farmville talented staff in conserving our resources and promoting recreational opportunities for all G.K. Washington, Dillwyn of our constituents. The face of Virginia has dramatically changed since I first stepped foot in the woods Magazine Staff with my father many years ago. With a rapidly growing population, constant pressure to Interim Editor: Lee Walker Contributing Editors: Ron Messina, Paige Pearson develop our wild places, and the expanding diversity of backgrounds and experiences of Art Director: Lynda Richardson our citizens, emphasizing the importance of education and outreach to all audiences will be Production Manager: Carol Kushlak critical to our future success. Public education needs concerning wildlife are greater than Staff Contributors: B.I. Bell, Marika Byrd, Carol Heiser, Jay Kapalczynski, J.D. Kleopfer, Meghan ever, and public support for future funding needs will depend upon helping each and every Marchetti, Alex McCrickard, George Palmer, Virginian develop a connection with wildlife and the recreational opportunities that DGIF Marc Puckett provides. Printing by Progress Printing Plus, Lynchburg, VA Managing our wildlife resources and meeting the demand for increased services will always be top priorities for the agency. Whether working on habitat preservation and Copyright 2019 by the Virginia Department of Game and restoration, increasing public opportunities for both traditional and newer audiences, or Inland Fisheries. All rights reserved. confronting disease and invasive species issues that threaten our wildlife, our success will Virginia Wildlife (ISSN 0042 6792) is published bimonthly by the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. depend on the support and assistance of our constituents, promoted through enhancing the Send all subscription orders and address changes to Virginia relationships that we already enjoy and forming new ones along the way. Wildlife, P. O. Box 37832, Boone, Iowa 50037. Address all other communications concerning this publication to Vir­ As I sit back and enjoy reading the latest issue of Virginia Wildlife, I am reminded of the ginia Wildlife, P. O. Box 90778, Henrico, Virginia 23228­ 0778. Subscription rates are $12.95 for one year, $23.95 for overall contributions of Virginia’s wildlife-based recreational and boating opportunities, both two years; $4.00 per each back issue, subject to availability. to the Commonwealth’s economy and to our quality of life. I am excited to see what the future e Canadian rate is $24.95 for one year and $35.95 for two years, payable in U.S. funds. No refunds for amounts holds, and with your support, look forward to addressing the many challenges before us. less than $10.00. To subscribe, call toll­free (800)710-9369. is publication is intended for general informational pur­ poses only and every effort has been made to ensure its ac­ curacy. e information contained herein does not serve as a legal representation of fish and wildlife laws or regulations. e Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries does not assume responsibility for any change in dates, regula­ tions, or information that may occur after publication. e Department of Game and Inland Fisheries shall afford to all persons an equal access to Department programs and facilities without regard to race, color, religion, disability, MISSION STATEMENT national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, political affiliation, or veteran’s status. If you believe that you Conserve and manage wildlife populations and habitat for the benefit of present and future generations. Connect have been discriminated against in any program, activity or people to Virginia’s outdoors through boating, education, fishing, hunting, trapping, wildlife viewing and other facility, please write to: Virginia Department of Game and wildlife­related activities. Protect people and property by promoting safe outdoor experiences and managing Inland Fisheries, Attn: Executive Director’s Office, P. O. Box human­wildlife conflicts. 90778, Henrico, VA 23228. www.dgif.virginia.gov SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2019 ♦ 5 VOLUME 80 NUMBER 5 Joshua Gahagan, AKM Images, Inc. AKM Images, Gahagan, Joshua Stephen David Johnson Stephen David © © The snapping turtle spends most of its time underwater only leaving to change locations, search for a mate, or lay eggs. After searching for a nesting site, this female snapping turtle lays a clutch of 25-55 eggs. By Jo Ann Abell ne day last fall, the dogs were Their bite may not be venomous like a pit the United States and in southern and 7 years of age. Female turtles lay a single were one of the few reptile groups that to be strategic to catch their next meal. To raising a ruckus in our front viper, but it can still be quite painful. eastern Canada, which is the reason clutch of 26–55 eggs annually on average. survived the impact of a six-mile-wide surprise their prey, they bury themselves o yard. Their loud, insistent My husband, standing back a healthy they also go by the moniker “common There is a high nest failure rate, with most asteroid that struck the Earth about 65 in mud and lay in wait for their next meal barking told me they had discovered distance, tapped the turtle’s beak with a snapping turtle.” Snapping turtles are of their eggs eaten by raccoons, crows, million years ago and the nuclear winter to come along, then quickly strike and something that, at least in their minds, stout stick. The snapper instantly took the found all across the Commonwealth and hawks, skunks, coyotes, dogs, foxes, triggered by the event. snatch it. Juvenile snappers eat insects, didn’t belong there. Living in a very rural bait, clamping down and latching onto it, on some barrier islands, where they live and a host of other predators. Hatchling With their sharp beak and powerful worms, snails, small fish, and aquatic part of Rockbridge County in the foothills and even when he pulled on the stick, this in a variety of aquatic habitats including survival rate is only 6 to 9 percent in jaws, stubby legs, sharp claws, and long vegetation. Adult snappers eat larger prey of the Blue Ridge, we have a lot of ven- guy wasn’t letting go. With the business ponds, lakes, streams, rivers, swamps, Virginia, but if they make it to adulthood, Stegosaurus-like tail, snapping turtles including insects, crayfish, fish, frogs, omous snakes, and my fear was they had end of the snapper occupied, we were able and brackish marshes. Areas providing the rate of survivorship is high. have not changed much since dinosaurs salamanders, tadpoles, toads, snakes, cornered a rattlesnake or copperhead, but to lift it onto a tarp, load it in a wagon, and cover in the form of stumps, muskrat walked the Earth. In other turtles, young water birds, such as as I got closer, I saw that it was a far less move it a short distance to the creek in the lodges and burrows, overhanging ledges, A Modern-Day Link to fact, the ducklings, and plant material.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Public Comments to State Water Control Board Adequacy of NWP 12 to Ensure Compliance with State Standards
    Summary of Public Comments to State Water Control Board Adequacy of NWP 12 to Ensure Compliance with State Standards Prepared by Wild Virginia Dominion Pipeline Monitoring Coalition (DPMC) August 15, 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary . 7 I. Overall Body of Comments and Organization of the Online Records . 10 II. Waterbodies Discussed . 12 Mountain Valley Pipeline New River Basin Kimballton Branch . 14 (tributary to Stony Creek) Stony Creek . 15 (aka Big Stony Creek - tributary to New River) Little Stony Creek . 15 (tributary to New River) Doe Creek . 16 (tributary to New River) Greenbriar Branch . 17 (tributary to Sinking Creek) Unnamed Tributary to Grass Run . 17 (tributary to Grass Run) Sinking Creek . 18 (tributary to New River) James River Basin Craig Creek . 19 (tributary to James River) Roanoke River Basin Bottom Creek, Mill Creek, and Tributaries . 20 (tributary to South Fork Roanoke River) South Fork Roanoke River . 22 (tributary to Roanoke River) Mill Creek (Montogomery Co.) . 23 (tributary to North Fork Roanoke River) Bottom Spring . 24 (tributary to North Fork Roanoke River) Salmon Spring . 24 (tributary to North Fork Roanoke River) 2 Bradshaw Creek . 25 (tributary to North Fork Roanoke River) Flatwoods Branch . 25 (tributary to North Fork Roanoke River) North Fork Roanoke River . 25 (tributary to Roanoke River) North Fork Blackwater River . 26 (tributary to Blackwater River) Green Creek . 27 (tributary to South Fork Blackwater River) Teels Creek . 27 (tributary to Little Creek) Little Creek . 28 (tributary to Blackwater River) Blackwater River . 28 (tributary to Roanoke River - Smith Mtn. Lake) Pigg River . 29 (tributary to Roanoke River - Leesville Lake) Roanoke River .
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Mansions in the Early Han (C
    Cosmologies of Change The Inscapes of the Classic of Change Stephen Karcher Ph.D. 1 2 Sections Cosmologies of Change Yellow Dragon Palace Azure Dragon Palace Vermillion Bird Palace Black Turtle Palace The Matrix of Change 3 Cosmologies of Change The tradition or Way of the Classic of Change is like a great stream of symbols flowing back and forth through the present moment to connect the wisdom of ancient times with whatever the future may be. It is a language that everything speaks; through it everything is always talking to everything else. Things are always vanishing and coming into being, a continual process of creation that becomes knowable or readable at the intersection points embodied in the symbols of this language. These symbols or images of Change open a sacred cosmos that has acted as a place of close encounter with the spirit world for countless generations. Without this sort of contact our world shrinks and fades away, leaving us in a deaf and dumb wasteland, forever outside of things. 31:32 Conjoining and Persevering displays the process through which spirit enters and influences the human world, offering omens that, when given an enduring form, help the heart endure on the voyage of life. This cosmos has the shape of the Numinous Turtle, swimming in the endless seas of the Way or Dao. Heaven is above, Earth and the Ghost River are below, the Sun Tree lies to the East, the Moon Tree is in the far West. The space between, spread to the Four Directions, is the world we live in, full of shrines and temples where we talk with the ghosts and spirits, hidden winds, elemental powers and dream animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Log of the Geology of Frederick County, Virginia W
    Vol. 17 MAY, 1971 No. 2 ROAD LOG OF THE GEOLOGY OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA W. E. Nunan The following road log is a guide to geologic The user of this road log should keep in mind features along or near main roads in Frederick that automobile odometers vary in accuracy. Dis- County, Virginia. Distances and cumulative mile- tances between stops and road intersections ages between places where interesting and repre- should be checked frequently, especially at junc- sentative-lithologies, formational contacts, struc- tions or stream crossings immediately preceding tural features, fossils, and geomorphic features stops. The Frederick County road map of the occur are noted. At least one exposure for nearly Virginia Department of Highways, and the U. S. each formation is included in the log. Brief dis- Geological Survey 7.5-minute topographic maps cussions of the geological features observable at are recommended for use with this road log. the various stops is included in the text. Topographic maps covering Frederick County include Boyce, Capon Bridge, Capon Springs, A comprehensive report of the geology of the Glengary, Gore, Hayfield, Inwood, Middletown, Mountain Falls, Ridge, Stephens City, Stephen- County is presented in "Geology and Mineral Re- son, Wardensville, White Hall, and Winchester. sources of Frederick County" by Charles Butts The route of the road log (Figure 1) shows U. S. and R. S. Edmundson, Bulletin 80 of the Virginia and State Highways and those State Roads trav- Division of Mineral Resources. The publication eled or needed for reference at intersections. has a 1:62,500 scale geologic map in color, which Pertinent place names, streams, and railroad is available from the Division for $4.00 plus sales crossings are indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • TỨ ĐẠI Vs. NGŨ HÀNH Nguyễn Quốc Bảo
    LẠI ĂN TỤC NÓI PHÉT ĐŨA VÀ NGUYÊN LÍ NHỊ NGUYÊN PHẦN II: TỨ ĐẠI vs. NGŨ HÀNH Nguyễn Quốc Bảo Thou hast as chiding a nativity As fire, water, earth and heaven can make To herald thee from the womb PERICLES, Shakespeare, Pericles Prince of Tyre. Trong bài Ăn Tục Nói Phét Đũa và Nguyên lí Nhị Nguyên Phần I, có đoạn viết: … Hệ Từ Thượng Truyện viết nguồn gốc của Vũ Trụ: Vô Cực sinh Thái Cực, Thái Cực sinh Luỡng Nghi, Lưỡng Nghi sinh Tứ Tượng Ngũ Hành, Ngũ Hành sinh Bát Quái, Bát Quái là gốc của 64 quẻ Kinh dịch. … Thành thử Âm Dương đi 2 lối khác nhau, Tam Tài Ngũ Hành (Dương, với Số lẻ) và Tứ Tượng Bát Quái (Âm, với Số chẵn). … Âm Dương chuyển hóa theo chu kỳ Ngũ Hành Kim Mộc Thủy Hỏa Thổ, để quy định những quy luật tự nhiên trong xã hội loài người. Trời cao đất rộng, năm qua tháng lại, thời tiết lúc nhập Xuân ấm áp, nên rảnh rang lại xin chư vị bằng hữu cho phép nổi cơn ATNP, để mạn bàn thêm một chuyện vớ vẩn: từ văn hóa Đũa, chủng Bách Việt đã nhận thức lý luận nhị nguyên và vượt đến nguyên lí vĩnh cửu Âm Dương, rồi Âm Dương sinh Tứ Tượng Ngũ Hành. Trong khi đó, Văn hoá Phương Tây trong tiến trình phát triển, nhận thức ra khái niệm Tứ Đại (và Ngũ Đại). Nay xin so sánh Tứ Đại Hoả Địa Khí Thuỷ vs. Ngũ Hành Kim Thủy Mộc Hỏa Thổ, thử tìm hiểu xem hai Văn hóa Đông Tây trong lãnh vực này có điểm trùng hợp hay tương xứng, để có thể đi tới kết luận có một Chân Lý Toàn Năng, giống như đã thảo luận trước đây với Đũa Nguyên lí Nhị Nguyên (Xin xem Đũa phần I).
    [Show full text]
  • Reef Fish Fishing Under the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan (RFFMP) and Proposed Amendment 23
    _______________________________________________________ Endangered Species Act - Section 7 Consultation Biological Opinion Action Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Southeast Regional Office (SERO), Sustainable Fisheries Division (F/SER2). Activity: The Continued Authorization of Reef Fish Fishing under the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan (RFFMP) and Proposed Amendment 23. Consulting Agency: NO NMFS, SERO, Protected Resources Division (F/SER3). Approved by: ‘ RofE. Crabtree, Ph.D., Regional Administrator. Date Issued: I / Contents: 1.0 Consultation History 2 2.0 Description of the Proposed Action 4 3.0 Status of the Species 21 4.0 Environmental Baseline 45 5.0 Effects of the Proposed Action 54 6.0 Cumulative Effects 86 7.0 Jeopardy Analysis 87 8.0 Conclusion 93 9.0 Incidental Take Statement 93 10.0 Conservation Recommendations 96 11.0 Reinitiation Statement 97 12.0 Literature Cited 98 Introduction Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq.), requires each federal agency to ensure any action they authorize, fund, or carry out is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered or threatened species or to result in the destruction or adverse modification of any designated critical habitat of such species. When the action of a federal agency may affect a species protected under the ESA, that agency is required to consult with either the NMFS or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, depending on the protected species that may be affected. Formal consultations on most listed marine species are conducted between the action agency and NMFS.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 660—Fisheries Off West Coast States and in the West- Ern Pacific
    Pt. 660 50 CFR Ch. VI (10–1–05 Edition) PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST 660.48 Gear restrictions. 660.49 At-sea observer coverage. COAST STATES AND IN THE WEST- 660.50 Harvest limitation program. ERN PACIFIC 660.51 Monk seal protective measures. 660.52 Monk seal emergency protective Subpart A—General measures. 660.53 Framework procedures. Sec. 660.54 Five-year review. 660.1 Purpose and scope. 660.2 Relation to other laws. Subpart E—Bottomfish And Seamount 660.3 Reporting and recordkeeping. Groundfish Fisheries Subpart B—Western Pacific Fisheries— 660.61 Permits. General 660.62 Prohibitions. 660.63 Notification. 660.11 Purpose and scope. 660.64 Gear restrictions. 660.12 Definitions. 660.65 At-sea observer coverage. 660.13 Permits and fees. 660.66 Protected species conservation. 660.14 Reporting and recordkeeping. 660.67 Framework for regulatory adjust- 660.15 Prohibitions. ments. 660.16 Vessel identification. 660.68 Fishing moratorium on Hancock Sea- 660.17 Experimental fishing. mount. 660.18 Area restrictions. 660.69 Management subareas. Subpart C—Western Pacific Pelagic Subpart F—Precious Corals Fisheries Fisheries 660.81 Permits. 660.21 Permits. 660.82 Prohibitions. 660.22 Prohibitions. 660.83 Seasons. 660.23 Notifications. 660.84 Quotas. 660.24 Gear identification. 660.85 Closures. 660.25 Vessel monitoring system. 660.86 Size restrictions. 660.26 Longline fishing prohibited area man- 660.87 Area restrictions. agement. 660.88 Gear restrictions. 660.27 Exemptions for longline fishing pro- 660.89 Framework procedures. hibited areas; procedures. 660.28 Conditions for at-sea observer cov- Subpart G—West Coast Groundfish erage.
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Mansion Names in South-West China
    Onoma 51 Journal of the International Council of Onomastic Sciences ISSN: 0078-463X; e-ISSN: 1783-1644 Journal homepage: https://onomajournal.org/ Lunar mansion names in South-West China: An etymological reconstruction of ancestral astronomical designations in Moso, Pumi, and Yi cultures compared with Chinese and Tibetan contexts DOI: 10.34158/ONOMA.51/2016/6 Xu Duoduo National University of Singapore (NUS), Asia Research Institute (ARI), Singapore [email protected] To cite this article: Xu Duoduo. 2016. Lunar mansion names in South-West China: An etymological reconstruction of ancestral astronomical designations in Moso, Pumi, and Yi cultures compared with Chinese and Tibetan contexts. Onoma 51, 113–143. DOI: 10.34158/ONOMA.51/2016/6 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.34158/ONOMA.51/2016/6 © Onoma and the author. Lunar mansion names in South-West China: An etymological reconstruction of ancestral astronomical designations in Moso, Pumi, and Yi cultures compared with Chinese and Tibetan contexts Abstract: The present study aims at an etymological reconstruction of lunar mansion designations of the Moso, Pumi, and Yi people from South-West China. Those lunar mansions are generally named after animals. A systematic examination on these astronomical names reveals frequent borrowing processes among these cultures, extended to Tibetan and Chinese contexts. Three patterns of direct borrowing of the lunar mansion names can be highlighted in addition to compatible morphological structures in some designation. This comparative research also provides innovative 114 XU DUODUO solutions to several issues still unsolved from the current studies on lunar mansions focused on specific ethnic groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Mean Long-Term Hydrologic Budget Components For
    urren : C t R gy e o s l e o r a r d c Sanford et al., Hydrol Current Res 2015, 6:1 y h H Hydrology DOI: 10.4172/2157-7587.1000191 Current Research ISSN: 2157-7587 Research Article Open Access Estimating Mean Long-term Hydrologic Budget Components for Watersheds and Counties: An Application to the Commonwealth of Virginia, USA Ward E Sanford1*, David L Nelms2, Jason P Pope2 and David L Selnick3 1Mail Stop 431, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, 20171, USA 2U.S. Geological Survey, Richmond, Virginia, USA 3U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, USA Abstract Mean long-term hydrologic budget components, such as recharge and base flow, are often difficult to estimate because they can vary substantially in space and time. Mean long-term fluxes were calculated in this study for precipitation, surface runoff, infiltration, total evapotranspiration (ET), riparian ET, recharge, base flow (or groundwater discharge) and net total outflow using long-term estimates of mean ET and precipitation and the assumption that the relative change in storage over that 30-year period is small compared to the total ET or precipitation. Fluxes of these components were first estimated on a number of real-time-gaged watersheds across Virginia. Specific conductance was used to distinguish and separate surface runoff from base flow. Specific-conductance (SC) data were collected every 15 minutes at 75 real-time gages for approximately 18 months between March 2007 and August 2008. Precipitation was estimated for 1971-2000 using PRISM climate data. Precipitation and temperature from the PRISM data were used to develop a regression-based relation to estimate total ET.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 MS4 Permit Year 2 Annual Report
    GENERAL PERMIT FOR SMALL MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS PERMIT NUMBER: VAR040053 Permit Year 2 Annual Report Reporting Period: July 1, 2014 - June 30, 2015 City of Winchester, Virginia Rouss City Hall Public Services Department 15 North Cameron Street Winchester, VA 22601 October 1, 2015 City of Winchester, Virginia Permit Year 2 Annual Report Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 Background Information ......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Status of Permit Condition Compliance .................................................................................. 2 2.1. Assessment of BMP Appropriateness .................................................................................... 2 2.2. Required MS4 Program Plan Updates ................................................................................... 2 2.3. Measureable Goals Progress ................................................................................................. 3 3.0 Results of Collected Data ..................................................................................................... 18 4.0 Future Stormwater Activities ................................................................................................ 18 5.0 Changes in BMPs and Measurable Goals ............................................................................ 18 5.1. Changes in BMPs/Program Elements .................................................................................. 19 5.2. Changes in Measureable
    [Show full text]
  • GAME FISH STREAMS and RECORDS of FISHES from the POTOMAC-SHENANDOAH RIVER SYSTEM of VIRGINIA
    ) • GAME FISH STREAMS AND RECORDS OF FISHES FROM THE POTOMAC-SHENANDOAH RIVER SYSTEM Of VIRGINIA Robert D. Ross Associate Professor of Biology Technical Bulletin 140 April 1959 Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station Virginia Polytechnic Institute Blacksburg, Virginia ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer is grateful to Eugene S. Surber, Robert G. Martin and Jack M. Hoffman who directed the survey and gave their help and encouragement. A great deal of credit for the success of the Survey is due to all game wardens who rendered invaluable assistance. Special thanks are due to many sportsmen and assistant game wardens who helped the field crew. Personnel of the Commission of Game and Inland Fisheries, who helped in the work from time to time were William Fadley, William Hawley, Max Carpenter and Dixie L. Shumate. The Virginia Academy of Science gener- ously donated funds for the purchase of alcohol in which the fish collection was preserved. GAME FISH STREAMS AND RECORDS OF FISHES FROM THE SHENANDOAH-POTOMAC RIVER SYSTEMS OF VIRGINIA Robert D. Ross Associate Professor of Biology Virginia Polytechnic Institute INTRODUCTION From June 15 to September 15, 1956, the Commission of Game and Inland Fisheries, Division of Fisheries, Richmond, Virginia, undertook a survey of a major part of the Shenandoah-Potomac River watershed in Virginia. This work was done as Federal Aid Project No. F-8-R-3, in cooperation with Vir- ginia Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, under the direction of Robert G. Martin, Dingell-Johnson Coordinator, and Jack M. Hoffman, Leader. Robert D. Ross, Crew Leader, and David W. Robinson and Charles H. Hanson worked in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E – Development and Refinement of Hydrologic Model
    Appendix E – Development and Refinement of Hydrologic Model Contents Hydrologic modeling efforts for the MPRWA project had multiple components. Detailed descriptions about the hydrologic modeling methodology are provided in the files on the attached disc. The file names listed below are identical to the file names on the disc. Disc Contents Documents (PDF files) AppendixE_HydrologicModel.pdf (74 KB) – this file FutureScenarios_110712.pdf (1,891 KB) Describes the development of the five future scenarios in the CBP HSPF modeling environment. It also spatially presents the resulting hydrologic alteration in seven selected flow metrics. Watershed_delineation_011712.pdf (537 KB) Describes how biological monitoring points were selected from the Chessie BIBI database and, once selected, how the watersheds draining to those locations were delineated. Resegmentation_at_Impoundments_011712.pdf (376 KB) Describes the methodology utilized to re-segment the CBP HSPF model at “significant” impoundments in the study area. Pot-Susq_CART_analysis_011712.pdf (486 KB) Describes how thresholds of flow alteration risk were identified by a CART analysis of the Potomac-Susquehanna dataset of gaged watersheds. Baseline_Landuse_011212.pdf (143 KB) Describes the calculation of land uses in the baseline model scenario. Baseline_Scenario_011212.pdf (580 KB) Describes the development of the baseline scenario in the CBP HSPF modeling environment including the removal of impoundments, withdrawals, and discharges, and conversion of current to baseline land uses. Select results of the baseline scenario are also presented. WOOOMM_Inputs_011012.pdf (525 KB) Describes the inputs needed to establish the ELOHA watersheds in the VADEQ WOOOMM environment and documents how those inputs were developed. Application_of_ModelingTools_011312.pdf (619 KB) Describes the evaluation of the CBP Phase 5 model and VADEQ WOOOMM module for use in the Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment.
    [Show full text]