DOCSLIB.ORG

Development of the Unique Narva-Ivangorod Fortresses Ensemble As a Single Cultural and Tourist Object

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Development of the unique Narva-Ivangorod fortresses ensemble as a single cultural and tourist object 1 Development of the unique Narva-Ivangorod fortresses ensemble as a single cultural and tourist object Project period: 14 May 2012 – 31 December 2014 Grant Contract is signed 26 July 2012 2 Project budget (EUR): Partner Total Programm Partner’s budget e co- contributio financing* n Applicant 3 471 455 3 124 309 347 146 (Partner 1) Partner 2 3 400 000 3 060 000 340 000 Total 6 871 455 6 184 309 687 146 * The project is partly co-financed from the Estonian National contribution allocated to the 2007-2013 Estonia-Latvia-Russia ENPI CBC Programme. The contribution from the Estonian State budget to the project is 1 836 487 EUR. 3 Project partners: Narva City Government, Department for City Development and Economy (Lead Partner); "Museum Agency" Leningradskaya Oblast State Budget Institution of Culture. Project associated partners: Narva Museum; Ida-Viru County Government; Heritage Conservation Board of Estonia; Administration of Municipal Foundation “City Ivangorod, Kingisepp district, Leningrad oblast”; Ivangorod Museum; Committee for culture of Leningrad region. 4 Project target groups: Domestic and foreign TOURISTS (ca 177 000 tourists per year). The new tourist possibilities attract more tourists and make their stay in Narva and Ivangorod longer; LOCAL POPULATION (64 667 inhabitants in Narva ca 11 200 inh. in Ivangorod). Local population enjoys new recreation places, that attract investors and young families to work and stay in this region. TOURIST COMPANIES (more than 50) get more opportunities to expand their businesses and suggest new types of services to tourists and local population. Project partners as well as NARVA and IVANGOROD MUSEUMS get very positive impact on conservation and development of the unique Narva-Ivangorod trans-border fortresses ensemble as single cultural and tourist object. 5 Objectives: The overall objective of the project is to increase the competitiveness of the cross-border region through development of the unique Narva-Ivangorod trans-border fortresses ensemble as a single cultural and tourist object The sub-objectives of the project are: Conservation and reconstruction of Narva-Ivangorod fortifications (Narva Victoria bastion and Ivangorod fortress Small Powder Granary) Development of necessary tourism infrastructure Expanding cross-border cooperation 6 Problems to be solved: At the Estonian – Russian border there is a unique ensemble of two fortresses of great cultural and historical value, but their historical and cultural potential is not used in full; moreover the fortresses are dilapidating; The tourist infrastructure is not sufficiently developed, some fortifications in poor condition and danger of collapsing. There are no interactive expositions in Narva. There is neither possibility to visit casemates inside nor opportunity to know better history of bastions in Narva. Tourists stay in Narva for a shot time. Ivangorod fortress requires restoration and development of the territory. In addition to time-coursed damages the fortress has significant damages appeared during the World War II. 7 8 Planned investments Narva Victoria bastion external walls restoration / renewal and strengthening Victoria bastion casemate double-level galleries restoration / renewal Restoration and strengthening of external curtain wall between Honor and Victoria bastions and the former Powder cellar Arrangement of green spaces, construction of foot-paths, grounds and access roads, installation of small forms illumination Visitor centre creation in Powder cellar Creation of the exposition and opening Victoria bastion to the visitors 9 Planned investments (Ivangorod): Reconstruction of the Small Powder Granary and Visitor centre creation: - exhibition halls - welcome Centre: wardrobe, waiting area, information zone - souvenir shop - technical rooms, WC Conservation of the fortress, 1492 y.: Improvement of the yard territory Conservation of the fortress inner walls Creation of the exposition in Small Power Granary 10 10 10 10 Other project activities: Training for guides and museum staff; Marketing (including joint marketing), visibility and PR activities; Project management activities (project staff activities, expanding cross-border cooperation, partner meetings, reporting etc); External experts works (Technical design, Construction supervision control, Designer control, Archaeological control, Heritage protection supervision control, Audit, Public procurement etc). 11 Expected project results: Historical fortifications (Victoria bastion and Powder cellar, and The Small Powder Granary) reconstructed and opened for visitors; Necessary tourism infrastructure developed ( 2 expositions, 2 visitors centers, safe access roads, info-signs, recreation zones, toilets, etc); Improved quality and accessibility of tourist information (developed tourist materials, trained guides and museum staff, touch-screen-computer etc); Accessibility of Narva and Ivangorod fortresses improved; Expanded cross-border cooperation between project partners and border cities. 12 Indicators of achievement: Quality and variety of possibilities for tourists’ stay in the region increased Number of overnights tourists increased 15% Number of information receivers increased Increase on number of tourists 15% Increase of tourists’ staying time 15% 5 working places created (2 - in Narva, 3 - in Ivangorod) 13 Long-term impact: It would ensure better opportunities to guarantee the basic necessities by improving the quality of the living environment for the inhabitants of the cross-border regions. It would attract investors and business. Level of an unemployment will decrease. It will increase the revenues of local and regional budgets. Good living environment and developed business will improve image of the regions. It will attract young families to work and stay in this region. Decrease of out-migration. Increase of population in the region. Narva and Ivangorod united tourist destination will help generate additional income from tourism. It will facilitate fast and stable socio-economic development of cross-border regions. Criminality level will decrease. 14 Assumptions: Support on local, regional and national level. Available funding sources to continue the development of fortresses ensemble as a single cultural and tourist object Simplified visa regime and improved border crossing infrastructure support tourists` flow increasing State support CBC tourism development Growing demand for different tourism services, Realization of related project for the united tourist destination. 15 Thank you! http://www.forttour.net/lsp6.html 16.
Recommended publications
  • Experimental Study of Municipal Solid Waste (Msw) Landfills and Non- Authorized Waste Damps Impact on the Environment

    Experimental Study of Municipal Solid Waste (Msw) Landfills and Non- Authorized Waste Damps Impact on the Environment

    Linnaeus ECO-TECH ´10 Kalmar, Sweden, November 22-24, 2010 EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE (MSW) LANDFILLS AND NON- AUTHORIZED WASTE DAMPS IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT Veronica Tarbaeva Dmitry Delarov Committee on Natural Resources of Leningrad region, Russia ABSTRACT A purpose was an analysis of waste disposal sites existing in the Leningrad region and a choice of facilities potentially suitable for the removal and utilization of greenhouse- and other gases. In order to achieve the purpose in view, data were collected on the arrangement of non-authorized landfills and waste dumps within the Leningrad region. The preliminary visual evaluation and instrumental monitoring were carried out for 10 facilities. The evaluation of greenhouse- and other gas emissions into the atmosphere as well as of ground water pollution near places of waste disposal was performed. A databank was created for waste disposal sites where it could be possible to organize the work on removing and utilizing of greenhouse gas. The conducted examination stated that landfills exert negative influence on the environment in the form of emissions into the atmosphere and impurities penetrating underground and surface water. A volume of greenhouse gas emissions calculated in units of СО2 – equivalent from different projects fluctuates from 63.8 to 8091.4 t in units of СО2 – equivalent. Maximum summarized emissions of greenhouse gases in units of СО2 – equivalent were stated for MSW landfills of the towns of Kirishi, Novaya Ladoga and Slantsy, as well as for MSW landfills near Lepsari residential settlement and the town of Vyborg. KEYWORDS Non-authorized waste dumps, MSW landfills, greenhouse gases, atmospheric air pollution, instrumental monitoring.
  • Here in 2017 Sillamäe Vabatsoon 46% of Manufacturing Companies with 20 Or More Employees Were Located

    Here in 2017 Sillamäe Vabatsoon 46% of Manufacturing Companies with 20 Or More Employees Were Located

    Baltic Loop People and freight moving – examples from Estonia Final Conference of Baltic Loop Project / ZOOM, Date [16th of June 2021] Kaarel Kose Union of Harju County Municipalities Baltic Loop connections Baltic Loop Final Conference / 16.06.2021 Baltic Loop connections Baltic Loop Final Conference / 16.06.2021 Strategic goals HARJU COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY 2035+ • STRATEGIC GOAL No 3: Fast, convenient and environmentally friendly connections with the world and the rest of Estonia as well as within the county. • Tallinn Bypass Railway, to remove dangerous goods and cargo flows passing through the centre of Tallinn from the Kopli cargo station; • Reconstruction of Tallinn-Paldiski (main road no. 8) and Tallinn ring road (main highway no. 11) to increase traffic safety and capacity • Indicator: domestic and international passenger connections (travel time, number of connections) Tallinn–Narva ca 1 h NATIONAL TRANSPORT AND MOBILITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2021-2035 • The main focus of the development plan is to reduce the environmental footprint of transport means and systems, ie a policy for the development of sustainable transport to help achieve the climate goals for 2030 and 2050. • a special plan for the Tallinn ring railway must be initiated in order to find out the feasibility of the project. • smart and safe roads in three main directions (Tallinn-Tartu, Tallinn-Narva, Tallinn-Pärnu) in order to reduce the time-space distances of cities and increase traffic safety (5G readiness etc). • increase speed on the railways to reduce time-space distances and improve safety; shift both passenger and freight traffic from road to rail and to increase its positive impact on the environment through more frequent use of rail (Tallinn-Narva connection 2035 1h45min) GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF CLIMATE POLICY UNTIL 2050 / NEC DIRECTIVE / ETC.
  • Common Heritage Совместное Наследие

    Common Heritage Совместное Наследие

    COMMON HERITAGE СОВМЕСТНОЕ НАСЛЕДИЕ The multicultural heritage of Vyborg and its preservation Мультикультурное наследие Выборга и его сохранение COMMON HERITAGE СОВМЕСТНОЕ НАСЛЕДИЕ The multicultural heritage of Vyborg and its preservation Proceedings of the international seminar 13.–14.2.2014 at The Alvar Aalto library in Vyborg Мультикультурное наследие Выборга и его сохранение Труды мeждународного семинара 13.–14.2.2014 в Центральной городской библиотеке А. Аалто, Выборг Table of contents Оглавление Editor Netta Böök FOREWORD .................................................................6 Редактор Нетта Бёэк ПРЕДИСЛОВИЕ Graphic design Miina Blot Margaretha Ehrström, Maunu Häyrynen: Te dialogical landscape of Vyborg .....7 Графический дизайн Мийна Блот Маргарета Эрстрëм, Мауну Хяйрюнен: Диалогический ландшафт Выборга Translations Gareth Grifths and Kristina Kölhi / Gekko Design; Boris Sergeyev Переводы Гарет Гриффитс и Кристина Кëлхи / Гекко Дизайн; Борис Сергеев Publishers The Finnish National Committee of ICOMOS (International Council for Monuments and Sites) and OPENING WORDS The Finnish Architecture Society ..........................................................12 Издатели Финляндский национальный комитет ИКОМОС (Международного совета по сохранению ВСТУПИТЕЛЬНЫЕ СЛОВА памятников и достопримечательных мест) и Архитектурное общество Финляндии Maunu Häyrynen: Opening address of the seminar ............................15 Printed in Forssa Print Мауну Хяйрюнен: Вступительное обращение семинара Отпечатано в типографии Forssa Print
  • This Is the Published Version of a Chapter

    This Is the Published Version of a Chapter

    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a chapter published in Conflict and Cooperation in Divided Towns and Cities. Citation for the original published chapter: Lundén, T. (2009) Valga-Valka, Narva – Ivangorod Estonia’s divided border cities – cooperation and conflict within and beyond the EU. In: Jaroslaw Jańczak (ed.), Conflict and Cooperation in Divided Towns and Cities (pp. 133-149). Berlin: Logos Thematicon N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published chapter. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-21061 133 Valga-Valka, Narva-Ivangorod. Estonia’s Divided Border Cities – Co-operation and Conflict Within and beyond the EU Thomas Lundén Boundary Theory Aboundary is a line, usually in space, at which a certain state of affairs is terminated and replaced by another state of affairs. In nature, boundaries mark the separation of different physical states (molecular configurations), e.g. the boundary between water and air at the surface of the sea, between wood and bark in a tree stem, or bark and air in a forest. The boundaries within an organized society are of a different character. Organization means structuration and direction, i.e. individuals and power resources are directed towards a specific, defined goal. This, in turn, requires delimitations of tasks to be done, as well as of the area in which action is to take place. The organization is defined in a competition for hegemony and markets, and with the aid of technology. But this game of definition and authority is, within the limitations prescribed by nature, governed by human beings.
  • Narva Power Plants, Eesti Energia, Estonia Nox Reduction Installations During 2013–2015

    Narva Power Plants, Eesti Energia, Estonia Nox Reduction Installations During 2013–2015

    Narva power plants, Eesti Energia, Estonia NOx reduction installations during 2013–2015 Fortum eNext reduced NOx emissions at Eesti Energia’s power plants in Narva by 50% Fortum eNext supplied low-NOx technology to Eesti Energia,to enable them to meet the European Union’s NOx emission limit of 200 mg/Nm3 that came to effect on January 1st 2016. Fortum’s delivery contained low-NOx technology installations for Narva power plants’ four units and eight boilers in total. Located near the city of Narva in Eastern Estonia, the Narva plants (Narva Elektrijaamad) consist of two of the world’s biggest oil shale fired power plants, responsible for over 90% of Estonia’s total electricity production. Fortum eNext delivery Customer gains • Modification of 4 units with 8 boilers • Meeting EU’s environmental regulation • New OFA system and wall corrosion • NOx reduction with primary methods protection system brought emission levels down to • Low-NOx combustion system control 180 mg/Nm3 • One boiler delivered with SNCR system, • Extremely small increase in operational the rest with primary methods only costs • Warranty value for NOx < 200 mg/Nm3, • No need for secondary NOx reduction actual daily average < 180 mg/Nm3 methods for majority of the boilers FACTS "We chose Fortum's low-NOx solution as a result of a European- • Customer: Eesti Energia, wide bidding competition. Fortum's Estonia’s biggest energy company clear strengths were its broad and • Oil shale-fired combusting long international experience in power plants in Narva, Estonia 1 combustion technologies. Now we • 8 units (320 t/h) with two boilers can continue energy production at and one steam turbine, and the power plants also after the EU's electric output of 200 MW each new emissions norms have taken • Low-NOx system for boiler 3A installed in 2013.
  • Town Twinning 5 of the Modern Gdańsk Shares Its Knowledge After EURO 2012 6 Twinning Areas

    Town Twinning 5 of the Modern Gdańsk Shares Its Knowledge After EURO 2012 6 Twinning Areas

    • AALBORG • AARHUS • ARENDAL • BERGEN • BOTKYRKA • CĒSIS • CHOJNICE • ELBLĄG • ELVA • ESPOO • FALUN • GARGŽDAI • GÄVLE • GDAŃSK • GDYNIA • GREIFSWALD • GULDBORGSUND • HAAPSALU • HALMSTAD • HELSINKI • HIIU • JĒKABPILS • JELGAVA • JÕGEVA • JÕHVI • JŪRMALA • JYVÄSKYLÄ • KALININGRAD • KALMAR • KARLSKRONA • KARLSTAD • KAUNAS • KEILA • KEMI • KIEL • KLAIPĖDA • KØGE • KOLDING • KOSZALIN • KOTKA • KRISTIANSAND • KRISTIANSTAD • KRYNICA M. • KURESSAARE • LAHTI • LIEPĀJA • LINKÖPING • LÜBECK • LULEÅ • ŁEBA • MAARDU • MALBORK • MALMÖ • MARIEHAMN • MIĘDZYZDROJE • MIELNO • NARVA • NÆSTVED • ÖREBRO • OSKARSHAMN • PALANGA • PALDISKI • PANEVĖŽYS • PÄRNU • PORI • PORVOO • PRUSZCZ GD. • RAKVERE • REDA • RIGA • ROBERTSFORS • ROSTOCK • ŠIAULIAI • SILLAMÄE • SŁUPSK • SÖDERHAMN • SOPOT • ST. PETERSBURG • SZCZECIN • TALLINN • TAMPERE • TARTU • TIERP • TRELLEBORG • TUKUMS • TURKU • UMEÅ • USTKA • VAASA • VÄSTERVIK • VÄXJÖ • VILJANDI • VILNIUS • VISBY • VORDINGBORG • VÕRU in the Baltic SeaRegion Baltic the in Town T winning winning Baltic Cities Bulletin Dear UBC Friends, The Union of the Baltic Cities is the biggest organisation grouping EDITOR IN CHIEF local authorities in the region. The potential is even greater if we add Paweł Żaboklicki all twin cities within the network and in the whole Baltic Sea Region. The majority of the UBC cities have at least two twin towns, many * have even several. This makes our organization a far larger network, with an enormous capabilities. But here many questions come up. Is EDITING & LAYOUT twinning fully exploited? Is it
  • Lake Peipsi/Chudskoe Basin – Lessons Learned

    Lake Peipsi/Chudskoe Basin – Lessons Learned

    Lake Peipsi/Chudskoe Lake Peipsi/Chudskoe Basin – Lessons Learned Gulnara Roll, Aija Kosk, Estonian Agricultural University Peeter Unt, Natalia Alexeeva, Peipsi Center for Transboundary Cooperation Introduction Lake Peipsi/Chudsko-Pskovskoe, sometimes called Peipus (further Peipsi), is the fourth largest and the biggest transboundary lake in Europe. Its three names originated from three languages historically used in the region – Peipsi came from Estonian, Chudsko-Pskovskoe from Russian and Peipus has German roots. Lake Peipsi belongs to the water basin of the Narva River (or Narova), a 77 km long watercourse, which connects Lake Peipsi with the Gulf of Finland of the Baltic Sea. Estonian and Russia share the Lake Peipsi and three countries, including Estonia, Russia and Latvia, share Narva River basin. Latvia has only 5% of the water basin and pollution from its territory is very small in the overall pollution load in the basin. What makes the Lake Peipsi specific and different from other great lakes of the world is that it is located on the future European Union border with Russia and is shared by countries in transition. Estonia regained its independence from the Soviet Union in 1991. Before that Lake Peipsi was an internal big lake in the northwest of the Soviet Union where the same legislation, procedures, environmental standards were applied for the whole lake basin and therefore it is a new transboundary lake. With these radical political changes at the beginning of the 1990s, the socio-economic context of water management also changed drastically as existed earlier economic contacts across the lake were disrupted with the establishment of border customs control on the border between Russia and Estonia.
  • Support for Development of a Salmon Management Plan in the Luga River

    Support for Development of a Salmon Management Plan in the Luga River

    BASE Project - Implementation of the Baltic Sea Action Plan in Russia Final report: Support for development of a Salmon management plan in the Luga River Pilot Activity ‘Support for development of a salmon management plan in the Luga River’ Implemented by (Main Consultant) All-Russian Social Organisation “All-Russian Society of Nature Protection”, Leningrad Region office (ARSoNP) Support provided by (EU Expert) Piotr Dębowski Inland Fisheries Institute in Gdansk/Poland. Authors of the report Sergey Titov, Dmitry Sendek, Sergey Mikhelson, Margarita Barabanova, Anton Uspensky, Olga Semenova and Sergey Rezvyi Compilation of this report State Research Institute on Lake and River Fisheries (GosNIORKh), St. Petersburg, RUSSIA For bibliographic purposes this document should HELCOM 2014, BASE project 2012-2014: be cited as ‘Support for development of a salmon management plan in the Luga River’ Design of cover Johanna Laurila, HELCOM Cover photo State Research Institute on Lake and River Fisheries (GosNIORKh), St. Petersburg, RUSSIA Back cover Johanna Laurila, HELCOM English editing (Executive summary and Introduction) Howard McKee, Key Image Ltd Implemented in the framework of: Project Implementation of the Baltic Sea Action Plan in Russia (BASE) Funded by EU Implemented by HELCOM Secretariat and St. Petersburg Public Organisation ‘Ecology and Business’ This report does not necessarily represent the views of HELCOM. HELCOM does not assume responsibility for the content of the report. Information included in this publication or extracts thereof are free for citation on the condition that the complete reference of the publication is given as stated above. Copyright 2014 Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission HELCOM CONTENTS Executive summary 4 1.
  • Technical-Economic Substantiation of The

    Technical-Economic Substantiation of The

    PROJECT PART-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Technical-economic substantiation of the development of tourist route(-s) in the section: Ivangorod (The Narova River) – The Rosson River (Children sanitary centre) – Silent Lake Saint-Petersburg January 2008 The Leningrad regional state institution «Information – Tourist Center» - 1 - PROJECT PART-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Plan 1. Studying the present situation 1.1. Development of water tourism in Leningrad region 1.1.1. General situation 1.1.2. Present infrastructure 1.1.3. Existent routes 1.1.3.1. Camp routes 1.1.3.2. Cruise lines 1.1.3.3. Regular communication 1.1.4. Sail-motor tourism development 1.1.5. Sports fishing in the region 1.1.6. Perspectives for the development of water tourism in Leningrad region 1.2. Investigation of potentially suitable places for water tourism along the route 1.2.1. Description of the rivers 1.2.2. Present recreation areas and parking places on the banks of the Narova River, Rosson River and lake Silent (Vaikne) 1.2.3. Historical places upon the Narova and the Rosson rivers. 1.2.4. History of navigation along the Narova and Rosson Rivers, Silent lake. 1.2.5. Existent mooring constructions along the route 1.2.6. Existent ships on the rivers that. 1.2.7. Approaches to Parking places 1.2.8. Resume concerning apt places for water tourism 1.3. Legal regulations of the development of the route(-s) along the rivers Narova, Rosson and lake Silent 1.3.1. Boundary regime rules. 1.3.2. Rules of the use of ships of small size and constructions for their berthing 1.3.3.
  • BR IFIC N° 2654 Index/Indice

    BR IFIC N° 2654 Index/Indice

    BR IFIC N° 2654 Index/Indice International Frequency Information Circular (Terrestrial Services) ITU - Radiocommunication Bureau Circular Internacional de Información sobre Frecuencias (Servicios Terrenales) UIT - Oficina de Radiocomunicaciones Circulaire Internationale d'Information sur les Fréquences (Services de Terre) UIT - Bureau des Radiocommunications Part 1 / Partie 1 / Parte 1 Date/Fecha 06.10.2009 Description of Columns Description des colonnes Descripción de columnas No. Sequential number Numéro séquenciel Número sequencial BR Id. BR identification number Numéro d'identification du BR Número de identificación de la BR Adm Notifying Administration Administration notificatrice Administración notificante 1A [MHz] Assigned frequency [MHz] Fréquence assignée [MHz] Frecuencia asignada [MHz] Name of the location of Nom de l'emplacement de Nombre del emplazamiento de 4A/5A transmitting / receiving station la station d'émission / réception estación transmisora / receptora 4B/5B Geographical area Zone géographique Zona geográfica 4C/5C Geographical coordinates Coordonnées géographiques Coordenadas geográficas 6A Class of station Classe de station Clase de estación Purpose of the notification: Objet de la notification: Propósito de la notificación: Intent ADD-addition MOD-modify ADD-ajouter MOD-modifier ADD-añadir MOD-modificar SUP-suppress W/D-withdraw SUP-supprimer W/D-retirer SUP-suprimir W/D-retirar No. BR Id Adm 1A [MHz] 4A/5A 4B/5B 4C/5C 6A Part Intent 1 109078651 ARG 7233.0000 PICHANAL ARG 64W13'34'' 23S19'09'' FX 1 ADD 2 109078654
  • Russian Balticbaltic Nationalnational Trendstrends && Hothot Spotsspots

    Russian Balticbaltic Nationalnational Trendstrends && Hothot Spotsspots

    RussianRussian BalticBaltic NationalNational TrendsTrends && HotHot SpotsSpots VeraVera OvcharenkoOvcharenko,, OlegOleg BodrovBodrov GreenGreen World,World, RussiaRussia CCB seminar “Coastal protection and development policy in the Baltic Sea Region” October 17-18, Jurmala, Latvia BalticBaltic RussiaRussia isis anan areaarea ofof crossingcrossing manymany interestinterest NiceNice NatureNature withwith GoodGood andand bigbig AreaArea forfor manymany NaturalNatural ValuesValues IndustrialIndustrial TheThe mostmost bigbig DevelopmentDevelopment biodiversitybiodiversity inin BalticBaltic TheThe newnew transporttransport SeaSea RegionRegion corridorcorridor acrossacross thethe 55 NatureNature ProtectedProtected BalticBaltic SeaSea forfor exportexport Areas/Areas/ RamsarRamsar SitesSites (logs,(logs, coal+oilcoal+oil,, liquefied gas) and PeoplePeople andand oldold liquefied gas) and traditionstraditions importimport (cars,(cars, RadRad waste).waste). DirectionDirection ofof developmentdevelopment isis unsustainableunsustainable DisintegrationDisintegration ofof thethe USSRUSSR andand joinjoin ofof BalticBaltic StatesStates EastEast EuropeanEuropean countriescountries toto EuropeanEuropean UnionUnion mademade thethe RussianRussian partpart ofof thethe GulfGulf ofof FinlandFinland aa borderborder territoryterritory betweenbetween RussiaRussia andand EU.EU. ThisThis stimulatedstimulated thethe developmentdevelopment ofof industryindustry andand transporttransport infrastructureinfrastructure inin thethe region.region. TheThe newnew transporttransport
  • Russians in Estonia: Is Narva the Next Crimea?

    Russians in Estonia: Is Narva the Next Crimea?

    Eurasian Geography and Economics ISSN: 1538-7216 (Print) 1938-2863 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rege20 Russians in Estonia: Is Narva the next Crimea? David J. Trimbach & Shannon O’Lear To cite this article: David J. Trimbach & Shannon O’Lear (2015): Russians in Estonia: Is Narva the next Crimea?, Eurasian Geography and Economics, DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2015.1110040 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2015.1110040 Published online: 11 Nov 2015. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rege20 Download by: [University of Kansas Libraries] Date: 11 November 2015, At: 09:04 Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2015.1110040 Russians in Estonia: Is Narva the next Crimea? David J. Trimbach* and Shannon O’Lear Department of Geography, University of Kansas, 1475 Jayhawk Blvd., 213 Lindley Hall, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA (Received 31 May 2015; accepted 15 October 2015) Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea and involvement in Ukrainian border regions pose serious consequences and questions. The precedence of Russian military intervention illustrates the porosity and potential for conflicts in other post-Soviet border regions. The Estonian borderland city of Narva, populated predominantly by Russian-speakers, is one such potential site of tension. Based on preliminary findings and data collected in Narva in 2013, this article provides an overview of citizenship, identity, and geographic affiliation issues among Narva’s Russian-speaking commu- nity in an effort to generate insights as to how any Russian overtures and potential intervention might be received in Narva.