<<

ta, Georgia USA tlan View metadata,citationandsimilarpapersatcore.ac.uk y) Smith, Jr., A

on 〉 PostScript processed by the SLAC/DESY Libraries on 22 Mar 1995. QUANT-PH-9503015 rank D. (T 1995 F c

h 1995 THEP-95-3 Marc t-ph/950301 5 l tm quan erb oard e.h k : h.edu hnology ec ysics h.edu/tsmith/hom provided byCERNDocumentServer y) Smith, Jr. erb oard mo del is constructed using a on brought toyouby k x for snail-mail eynman Chec Abstract ta, Georgia 30332 ho ol of Ph mo del describ ed in hep-ph/9501252 and 6 Sc tlan E .O.Bo A P and [email protected] ttp://www.gatec rank D. (T 5 x 430, Cartersville, Georgia 30120 USA CORE Georgia Institute of T F D e-mail: [email protected] eynman Chec 4 .O.Bo D P in 4-dimensional Spacetime WWW URL h t-ph/9503009. A generalized F Hyp erDiamond F 4-dimensional Hyp erDiamond . The resultingmo del phenomenological is the quan

Contents

1 Intro duction. 2

2 Feynman Checkerb oards. 3

3 Hyp erDiamond Lattices. 10

3.1 8-dimensional Hyp erDiamond Lattice. :: :: ::: :: :: :: 12

3.2 4-dimensional Hyp erDiamond Lattice. :: :: ::: :: :: :: 14

3.3 From 8 to 4 Dimensions. : ::: :: :: :: :: ::: :: :: :: 19

4 Internal Symmetry Space. 21

5 Protons, Pions, and Physical Gravitons. 25

5.1 3-Quark Protons. : :: :: ::: :: :: :: :: ::: :: :: :: 29

5.2 Quark-AntiQuark Pions. : ::: :: :: :: :: ::: :: :: :: 32

5.3 Spin-2 Physical Gravitons. ::: :: :: :: :: ::: :: :: :: 35 1

1 Intro duction.

The 1994 Georgia Tech Ph. D. thesis of Michael Gibbs under David Finkel-

stein [11] constructed a discrete 4-dimensional spacetime Hyp erDiamond lat-

tice, here denoted a 4HD lattice, in the course of building a physics mo del.

The 1992 MIT Ph. D. thesis of Hrvo je Hrgovcic under Tommasso To oli

[12] constructed a discrete 4-dimensional spacetime Minkowski lattice in the

course of building a simulation of solutions to the Dirac equation and other

equations.

Hrgovcic's lattice is closely related to the 4HD lattice.

Both the Gibbs mo del and the Hrgovcic simulation di er in signi cant

ways from the D D E mo del constructed from 3  3 o ctonion matrices

4 5 6

in hep-ph/9501252 and quant-ph/9503009 .

However, b oth theses have b een very helpful with resp ect to this pap er,

which generalizes the 2-dimensional Feynman checkerb oard [8, 9] to a phys-

ically realistic 4-dimensional spacetime.

In this 4-dimensional 4HD lattice generalized Feynman

Hyp erDiamond checkerb oard, the prop erties of the particles that move

around on the checkerb oard are determined by the physically

realistic D D E mo del constructed from 3  3 o ctonion matrices

4 5 6

in hep-ph/9501252 and quant-ph/9503009 .

The 4-dimensional Hyp erDiamond 4HD checkerb oard is related to

the 8-dimensional Hyp erDiamond 8HD = E in the same way

8

the 4-dimensional physical asso ciative spacetime is related to

the 8-dimensional o ctonionic spacetime in the D D E mo del,

4 5 6

so the Hyp erDiamond 4HD Feynman checkerb oard is fundamentally

the discrete version of the D D E mo del.

4 5 6

For more ab out o ctonions and lattices, see the works of Go e rey Dixon

[3, 4, 5, 6]. 2

2 Feynman Checkerb oards.

The 2-dimensional Feynman checkerb oard [8, 9] is a notably successful and

useful representation of the Dirac equation in 2-dimensional spacetime.

To build a Feynman 2-dimensional checkerb oard,

start with a 2-dimensional Diamond checkerb oard with

two future lightcone links and two past lightcone links at eachvertex.

The future lightcone then lo oks like

@I 

@

If the 2-dimensional Feynman checkerb oard is

co ordinatized by the complex plane C :

the real axis 1 is identi ed with the time axis t;

the imaginary axis i is identi ed with the space axis x; and

p p

the two future lightcone links are (1= 2 )(1 + i) and (1= 2)(1 i).

2 2

In cylindrical co ordinates t; r with r = x ,

2 2 2 2

the Euclidian metric is t + r = t + x and

the Wick-Rotated Minkowski metric with sp eed of light c is

2 2 2 2

(ct) r =(ct) x .

For the future lightcone links to lie on

the 2-dimensional Minkowski lightcone, c =1.

Either link is taken into the other link by complex multiplication by i.

Now, consider a path in the Feynman checkerb oard.

At a given vertex in the path, denote the future lightcone link in

the same direction as the past path link by1,and

the future lightcone link in the (only p ossible) changed direction by i. 3

1

i

@I 

@



The Feynman checkerb oard rule is that

if the future step at a vertex p oint of a given path is in a di erent direction

from the immediately preceding step from the past,

then the path at the p ointofchange gets a weightof im,

where m is the mass (only massive particles can change directions),and

 is the length of a path segment.

Here I have used the Gersch [10] convention

of weighting each turn by im

rather than the Feynman [8, 9] convention

of weighting by+im, b ecause Gersch's convention gives a b etter nonrela-

tivistic limit in the isomorphic 2-dimensional Ising mo del [10].

HOW SHOULD THIS BE GENERALIZED

TO HIGHER DIMENSIONS?

22 0

The 2-dim future light-cone is the 0-sphere S = S = fi; 1g ,

with 1 representing a path step to the future in

the same direction as the path step from the past, and

i representing a path step to the future in a

(only 1 in the 2-dimensional Feynman checkerb oard lattice)

di erent direction from the path step from the past.

The 2-dimensional Feynman checkerb oard lattice spacetime can b e

represented by the complex numb ers C ,

with 1;i representing the two future lightcone directions and

1; i representing the two past lightcone directions.

Consider a given path in

the Feynman checkerb oard lattice 2-dimensional spacetime. 4

Atany given vertex on the path in the lattice 2-dimensional spacetime,

the future lightcone direction representing the continuation of the path

in the same direction can b e represented by1,and

the future lightcone direction representing the (only 1 p ossible)

change of direction can b e represented by i since either

of the 2 future lightcone directions can b e taken into the other

bymultiplication by i,

+ for a left turn and for a right turn.

If the path do es change direction at the vertex,

then the path at the p ointofchange gets a weightof im,

where i is the complex imaginary,

m is the mass (only massive particles can change directions), and

 is the timelike length of a path segment, where the 2-dimensional sp eed of

light is taken to b e 1.

Here I have used the Gersch [10] convention

of weighting each turn by im

rather than the Feynman [8, 9] convention

of weighting by+im, b ecause Gersch's convention gives a b etter nonrela-

tivistic limit in the isomorphic 2-dimensional Ising mo del [10].

For a given path, let

C b e the total numb er of direction changes, and

c b e the cth change of direction, and

i b e the complex imaginary representing the cth change of direction.

C can b e no greater than the timelikecheckerb oard distance D

between the initial and nal p oints.

The total weight for the given path is then

Y Y

C C

im =(m) ( i)= (im) (1)

0cC 0cC

The pro duct is a vector in the direction 1ori. 5

Let N (C ) b e the numb er of paths with C changes in direction.

The propagator amplitude for the particle to go from the initial vertex

to the nal vertex is the sum over all paths of the weights, that is the path

integral sum over all weighted paths:

X

C

N (C )(im) (2)

0C D

The propagator phase is the angle b etween

the amplitude vector in the complex plane and the complex real axis.

Conventional attempts to generalize the Feynman checkerb oard from

2-dimensional spacetime to k -dimensional spacetime are based on

the fact that the 2-dimensional future light-cone directions are

22 0

the 0-sphere S = S = fi; 1g.

The k -dimensional continuous spacetime lightcone directions are

k 2

the (k 2)-sphere S .

2

In 4-dimensional continuous spacetime, the lightcone directions are S .

Instead of lo oking for a 4-dimensional lattice spacetime, Feynman

0 2

and other generalizers went from discrete S to continuous S

for lightcone directions, and then tried to construct a weighting

2

using changes of directions as rotations in the continuous S , and

never (as far as I know) got any generalization that worked. 6

THE D D E MODEL 4HD HYPERDIAMOND

4 5 6

GENERALIZATION HAS DISCRETE LIGHTCONE DIRECTIONS.

If the 4-dimensional Feynman checkerb oard is co ordinatized by

the quaternions Q:

the real axis 1 is identi ed with the time axis t;

the imaginary axes i; j; k are identi ed with the space axes x; y ; z ; and

the four future lightcone links are

(1=2)(1 + i + j + k ),

(1=2)(1 + i j k ),

(1=2)(1 i + j k ), and

(1=2)(1 i j + k ).

In cylindrical co ordinates t; r

2 2 2 2

with r = x + y + z ,

2 2 2 2 2 2

the Euclidian metric is t + r = t + x + y + z and

the Wick-Rotated Minkowski metric with sp eed of light c is

2 2 2 2 2 2

(ct) r =(ct) x y z .

For the future lightcone links to lie on

p

the 4-dimensional Minkowski lightcone, c = 3.

Any future lightcone link is taken into any other future lightcone

link by quaternion multiplication by i, j ,ork.

For a given vertex on a given path,

continuation in the same direction can b e represented by the link 1, and

changing direction can b e represented by the

imaginary quaternion i; j; k corresp onding to

the link transformation that makes the change of direction.

Therefore, at a vertex where a path changes direction,

a path can b e weighted by quaternion imaginaries

just as it is weighted by the complex imaginary in the 2-dimensional case.

If the path do es change direction at a vertex, then

the path at the p ointofchange gets a weightof im, jm,or km

where i; j; k is the quaternion imaginary representing the change of direction, 7

m is the mass (only massive particles can change directions), and

p

3  is the timelike length of a path segment,

p

where the 4-dimensional sp eed of light is taken to b e 3.

For a given path,

let C b e the total numb er of direction changes,

c b e the cth change of direction, and

e b e the quaternion imaginary i; j; k representing the cth change of direction.

c

C can b e no greater than the timelikecheckerb oard distance D

between the initial and nal p oints.

The total weight for the given path is then

p p

Y Y

C

e m 3 =(m 3) ( e ) (3)

c c

0cC 0cC

Note that since the quaternions are not commutative,

the pro duct must b e taken in the correct order.

The pro duct is a vector in the direction 1, i, j ,or k. and

Let N (C ) b e the numb er of paths with C changes in direction.

The propagator amplitude for the particle to go

from the initial vertex to the nal vertex is

the sum over all paths of the weights,

that is the path integral sum over all weighted paths:

p

X Y

C

N (C )(m 3 ) ( e ) (4)

c

0C D 0cC

The propagator phase is the angle b etween

the amplitude vector in quaternionic 4-space and

the quaternionic real axis. 8

The plane in quaternionic 4-space de ned by

the amplitude vector and the quaternionic real axis

can b e regarded as the complex plane of the propagator phase. 9

3 Hyp erDiamond Lattices.

The name "Hyp erDiamond" was rst used byDavid Finkelstein in our dis-

cussions of these structures.

n-dimensional Hyp erDiamond structures nH D are

constructed from D lattices.

n

An n-dimensional Hyp erDiamond structures nH D is a lattice

if and only if n is even.

If n is o dd, the nH D structure is

only a "packing", not a "lattice", b ecause a nearest neighb or link

from an origin vertex to a destination vertex

cannot b e extended in the same direction

to get another nearest neighb or link.

n-dimensional Hyp erDiamond structures nH D are

constructed from D lattices.

n

The lattices of typ e D are n-dimensional checkerb oard lattices, that is,

n

n

the alternate vertices of a Z hyp ercubic lattice. A general reference on

lattices is Conway and Sloane [1].

For the n-dimensional Hyp erDiamond lattice construction from D ,

n

Conway and Sloane use an n-dimensional glue vector [1] = (0:5; :::; 0:5)

(with n 0:5's).

Consider the 3-dimensional structure 3HD.

Start with D , the fcc close packing in 3-space.

3

Make a second D shifted by the glue vector (0:5; 0:5; 0:5).

3

Then form the union D [ ([1] + D ).

3 3

That is a 3-dimensional Diamond crystal structure,

the familiar 3-dimensional thing 10

for which Hyp erDiamond lattices are named. 11

3.1 8-dimensional Hyp erDiamond Lattice.

When you construct an 8-dimensional Hyp erDiamond 8HD lattice,

you get D [([1]+D )=E , the fundamental lattice of the o ctonion structures

8 8 8

in the D D E mo del describ ed in hep-ph/9501252 [14] and quant-

4 5 6

ph/9503009. [15 ]

The 240 nearest neighb ors to the origin in the E lattice can b e written

8

in 7 di erentways using

o ctonion co ordinates with basis

f1;e ;e ;e ;e ;e ;e ;e g (5)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

One way is:

16 vertices:

 1; e ; e ; e ; e ; e ; e ; e (6)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

96 vertices:

(1  e  e  e )=2

1 2 3

(1  e  e  e )=2

2 5 7

(1  e  e  e )=2

2 4 6

(7)

(e  e  e  e )=2

4 5 6 7

(e  e  e  e )=2

1 3 4 6

(e  e  e  e )=2

1 3 5 7

128 vertices:

(1  e  e  e )=2

3 4 7

(1  e  e  e )=2

1 5 6

(1  e  e  e )=2

3 6 7

(1  e  e  e )=2

1 4 7

(8)

(e  e  e  e )=2

1 2 6 7

(e  e  e  e )=2

2 3 4 7

(e  e  e  e )=2

1 2 4 5

(e  e  e  e )=2

2 3 5 6

That the E lattice is, in a sense, fundamentally 4-dimensional can b e

8

seen from several p oints of view: 12

the E lattice nearest neighbor vertices have only 4 non-zero co ordinates,

8

p

like 4-dimensional spacetime with sp eed of light c = 3 , rather than 8 non-

p

zero co ordinates, like 8-dimensional spacetime with sp eed of light c = 7, so

the E lattice light-cone structure app ears to b e 4-dimensional rather than

8

8-dimensional;

the representation of the E lattice by quaternionic icosians, as describ ed

8

by Conway and Sloane [1];

the Golden ratio construction of the E lattice from the D lattice, which

8 4

has a 24-cell nearest neighb or p olytop e (The construction starts with the

24 vertices of a 24-cell, then adds Golden ratio p oints on each of the 96

edges of the 24-cell, then extends the space to 8 dimensions by considering

p

the algebraicaly indep endent 5 part of the co ordinates to b e geometrically

indep endent, and nally doubling the resulting 120 vertices in 8-dimensional



space (by considering b oth the D lattice and its dual D ) to get the 240

4

4

vertices of the E lattice nearest neighb or p olytop e (the Witting p olytop e);

8

and

the fact that the 240-vertex Witting p olytop e, the E lattice nearest

8

neighb or p olytop e, most naturally lives in 4 complex dimensions, where it is

self-dual, rather than in 8 real dimensions.

Some more material on such things can b e found at

WWW URL http://www.gatech.edu/tsmith/home.html [13].

In referring to Conway and Sloane [1], b ear in mind that they use the

convention (usual in working with lattices) that the of a lattice distance

is the square of the length of the lattice distance. 13

3.2 4-dimensional Hyp erDiamond Lattice.

The 4-dimensional Hyp erDiamond lattice 4HD is

4HD = D [ ([1] + D ).

4 4

4

The 4-dimensional Hyp erDiamond 4HD = D [ ([1] + D )istheZ

4 4

hyp ercubic lattice with null edges.

It is the lattice that Michael Gibbs [11] uses in his Ph. D. thesis advised

byDavid Finkelstein.

The 8 nearest neighb ors to the origin in the 4-dimensional Hyp erDiamond

4HD lattice can b e written in o ctonion co ordinates as:

(1 + i + j + k )=2

(1 + i j k )=2

(1 i + j k )=2

(1 i j + k )=2

(9)

(1 i + j + k )=2

(1+ij +k)=2

(1+i+j k)=2

(1ij k)=2

Here is an explicit construction of the 4-dimensional Hyp erDiamond 4HD

lattice nearest neighb ors to the origin. 14

START WITH THE 24 VERTICES OF A 24-CELL D :

4

+1 +1 0 0

+1 0 +1 0

+1 0 0 +1

+1 1 0 0

+1 0 1 0

+1 0 0 1

1 +1 0 0

1 0 +1 0

1 0 0 +1

1 1 0 0

1 0 1 0

1 0 0 1

(10)

0 +1 +1 0

0 +1 0 +1

0 +1 1 0

0 +1 0 1

0 1 +1 0

0 1 0 +1

0 1 1 0

0 1 0 1

0 0 +1 +1

0 0 +1 1

0 0 1 +1

0 0 1 1 15

SHIFT THE LATTICE BY A GLUE VECTOR,

BY ADDING

0:5 0:5 0:5 0:5 (11)

TO GET 24 MORE VERTICES [1] + D :

4

+1:5 +1:5 0:5 0:5

+1:5 0:5 +1:5 0:5

+1:5 0:5 0:5 +1:5

+1:5 0:5 0:5 0:5

+1:5 0:5 0:5 0:5

+1:5 0:5 0:5 0:5

0:5 +1:5 0:5 0:5

0:5 0:5 +1:5 0:5

0:5 0:5 0:5 +1:5

0:5 0:5 0:5 0:5

0:5 0:5 0:5 0:5

0:5 0:5 0:5 0:5

(12)

0:5 +1:5 +1:5 0:5

0:5 +1:5 0:5 +1:5

0:5 +1:5 0:5 0:5

0:5 +1:5 0:5 0:5

0:5 0:5 +1:5 0:5

0:5 0:5 0:5 +1:5

0:5 0:5 0:5 0:5

0:5 0:5 0:5 0:5

0:5 0:5 +1:5 +1:5

0:5 0:5 +1:5 0:5

0:5 0:5 0:5 +1:5

0:5 0:5 0:5 0:5 16

FOR THE NEW COMBINED LATTICE D [ ([1] + D ),

4 4

THESE ARE 6 OF THE NEAREST NEIGHBORS

TO THE ORIGIN:

0:5 0:5 0:5 0:5

0:5 0:5 0:5 0:5

0:5 0:5 0:5 0:5

(13)

0:5 0:5 0:5 0:5

0:5 0:5 0:5 0:5

0:5 0:5 0:5 0:5

HERE ARE 2 MORE THAT COME FROM

ADDING THE GLUE VECTOR TO LATTICE VECTORS

THAT ARE NOT NEAREST NEIGHBORS OF THE ORIGIN:

0:5 0:5 0:5 0:5

(14)

0:5 0:5 0:5 0:5

THEY COME, RESPECTIVELY, FROM ADDING

THE GLUE VECTOR TO:

THE ORIGIN

0 0 0 0 (15)

ITSELF;

AND 17

THE LATTICE POINT

1 1 1 1 (16)

WHICH IS SECOND ORDER, FROM

1 1 0 0

pl us (17)

0 0 0 0

FROM

1 0 1 0

pl us (18)

0 1 0 1

OR FROM

1 0 0 1

pl us

(19)

0 1 1 0 18

3.3 From 8 to 4 Dimensions.

Dimensional reduction of the 8HD = E lattice spacetime to 4-dimensional

8

spacetime reduces eachoftheD lattices in the

8

E =8HD = D [ ([1] + D )

8 8 8

lattice to D lattices.

4

Therefore, we should get a 4-dimensional Hyp erDiamond

4HD = D [ ([1] + D )

4 4

lattice.

To see this, start with E =8HD = D [ ([1] + D ).

8 8 8

We can write:

D = f(D ; 0; 0; 0; 0)g[f(0; 0; 0; 0;D )g[ f(1; 0; 0; 0; 1; 0; 0; 0) + (D ;D )g

8 4 4 4 4

(20)

The third term is the diagonal term of

an orthogonal decomp osition of D , and

8

the rst two terms are the orthogonal

asso ciativephysical 4-dimensional spacetime

and

coasso ciative 4-dimensional internal symmetry space

as describ ed in

StandardModel plus Gravity from

Octonion Creators and Annihilators,

quant-th/9503009 [15].

Now, we see that the orthogonal decomp osition of 8-dimensional space-

time into 4-dimensional asso ciativephysical spacetime plus 4-dimensional

internal symmetry space gives a decomp osition of D into D  D .

8 4 4 19

Since E = D [ ([1] + D ), and

8 8 8

since [1] = (0:5; 0:5; 0:5; 0:5; 0:5; 0:5; 0:5; 0:5) can

b e decomp osed by

[1] = (0:5; 0:5; 0:5; 0:5; 0; 0; 0; 0)  (0; 0; 0; 0; 0:5; 0:5; 0:5; 0:5) (21)

wehave

E = D [([1] + D ) (22)

8 8 8

= ((D ; 0; 0; 0; 0)  (0; 0; 0; 0;D ))

4 4

[

(((0:5; 0:5; 0:5; 0:5; 0; 0; 0; 0)  (0; 0; 0; 0; 0:5; 0:5; 0:5; 0:5))

+

((D ; 0; 0; 0; 0)  (0; 0; 0; 0;D )))

4 4

= ((D ; 0; 0; 0; 0) [ ((0:5; 0:5; 0:5; 0:5; 0; 0; 0; 0) + (D ; 0; 0; 0; 0)))

4 4



((0; 0; 0; 0;D ) [ ((0; 0; 0; 0; 0:5; 0:5; 0:5; 0:5) + (0; 0; 0; 0;D )))

4 4

Since 4HD is D [ ([1] + D ),

4 4

E =8HD =4HD  4HD (23)

8 a ca

where 4HD is the 4-dimensional asso ciativephysical spacetime and

a

4HD is the 4-dimensional coasso ciativeinternal symmetry space.

ca 20

4 Internal Symmetry Space.

4HD is the 4-dimensional coasso ciativeInternal Symmetry Space of the 4-

ca

dimensional Hyp erDiamond Feynman checkerb oard version of the D D

4 5

E mo del.

6

Physically, the 4HD Internal Space should b e thought of as a space

ca

"inside" eachvertex of the 4HD Feynman checkerb oard spacetime, sort of

a

like a Kaluza-Klein structure.

The 4 dimensions of the 4HD Internal Symmetry Space are:

ca

electric charge;

red color charge;

green color charge; and

blue color charge.

Eachvertex of the 4HD lattice has 8 nearest neighb ors, connected by

ca

lightcone links. They have the algebraic structure of the 8-element quaternion

group < 2; 2; 2 >. [2]

Eachvertex of the 4HD lattice has 24 next-to-nearest neighb ors, con-

ca

nected bytwo lightcone links. They have the algebraic structure of the

24-element binary tetrahedral group < 3; 3; 2 > that is asso ciated with the

24-cell and the D lattice. [2]

4 21

The 1-time and 3-space dimensions of the 4HD spacetime can b e repre-

a

sented by the 4 future lightcone links and the 4 past lightcone links as in the

following pair of "Square Diagrams" of the 4 lines connecting the future ends

of the 4 future lightcone links and of the 4 lines connecting the past ends of

the 4 past lightcone links:

Z 1ij +k Y 1i+j k

T 1+i+j +k X 1+ij k

X 1i+j +k T 1ij k

Y 1+ij +k Z 1+i+j k

The 8 links fT ; X; Y ; Z; T; X; Y; Zg corresp ond to the 8 ro ot vec-

tors of the S pin(5) de Sitter gravitation gauge group, which has an 8-element

2

Weyl group S  S .

2

2

The of the 4 links of the future lightcone is S , the Weyl

4

group of the 15-dimensional Conformal group SU (4) = S pin(6).

10 of the 15 dimensions make up the de Sitter S pin(5) subgroup, and

the other 5 x the "symmetry-breaking direction" and scale of the Higgs

mechanism (for more on this, see [14] and

WWW URL http://www.gatech.edu/tsmith/cnfGrHg.html). 22

Similarly, the E-electric and RGB-color dimensions of the 4HD Internal

ca

Symmetry Space can b e represented by the 4 future lightcone links and the

4 past lightcone links.

However, in the 4HD Internal Symmetry Space the E Electric Charge

ca

should b e treated as indep endent of the RGB Color Charges.

As a result the following pair of "Square Diagrams" lo ok more like"Tri-

angle plus Point Diagrams".

B 1ij +k G 1i+j k

@I

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

E 1+i+j +k R 1+ij k

R 1i+j +k E 1ij k

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

G 1+ij +k B 1+i+j k 23

The 2+6 links fE; E; R; G; B ; R; G; B g corresp ond to:

the2rootvectors of the weak force SU (2), which has a 2-elementWeyl

group S ; and

2

the 6 ro ot vectors of the color force SU (3), which has a 6-elementWeyl

group S .

3 24

5 Protons, Pions, and Physical Gravitons.

In his 1994 Georgia Tech Ph. D. thesis under David Finkelstein, Spacetime as

a Quantum Graph, Michael Gibbs [11 ] describ es some 4-dimensional Hyp er-

Diamond lattice structures, that he considers likely candidates to represent

physical particles.

The terminology used by Michael Gibbs in his thesis [11] is useful with

resp ect to the mo del he constructs. Since his mo del is substantially di erent

from my Hyp erDiamond Feynman checkerb oard in some resp ects, I use a

di erent terminology here. However, I wanttomake it clear that I have

b orrowed these particular structures from his thesis.

Three useful Hyp erDiamond structures are:

3-link Rotating Propagator, useful for building a proton out of 3 quarks;

2-link Exchange Propagator, useful for building a pion out of a quark and

an antiquark; and

4-link Propagator, useful for building a physical spin-2 physical graviton

out of S pin(5) Gauge b osons..

In the 2-dimensional Feynman checkerb oard, there is only one massive

particle, the electron.

What ab out the D D E mo del, or any other mo del that has di erent

4 5 6

particles with di erent masses?

In the context of Feynman checkerb oards, mass is just the amplitude for

a particle to haveachange of direction in its path.

More massive particles will change direction more often.

In the D D E mo del, the 4HD Feynman checkerb oard fundamental

4 5 6

path segment length  of any particle the Planck length L .

PL

However, in the sum over paths for a particle of mass m, 25

it is a useful approximation to consider the path segment length to b e the

Compton wavelength L of the mass m,

m

L = h=mc

m

That is b ecause the distances b etween direction changes in the vast bulk

of the paths will b e at least L , and

m

those distances will b e approximately integral multiples of L ,

m

so that L can b e used as the e ective path segment length.

m

This is an imp ortant approximation b ecause the Planck length L is

PL

33

ab out 10 cm,

while the e ective length L for a particle of mass 100 GeV is ab out

100GeV

16

10 cm.

In this section, the 4HD lattice is given quaternionic co ordinates.

The orgin 0 designates the b eginning of the path.

The 4 future lightcone links from the origin are given the co ordinates

1+i+j +k,1+ijk,1i+jk,1ij+k

The path of a "Particle" at rest in space, moving 7 steps in time, is

denoted by

P ar ticl e

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

p p

Note that since the 4HD sp eed of lightis 3, the path length is 7 3. 26

The path of a "Particle" moving along a lightcone path in the 1 + i + j + k

direction for 7 steps with no change of direction is

P ar ticl e

0

1+i+j +k

2+2i+2j +2k

3+3i+3j +3k

4+4i+4j +4k

5+5i+5j +5k

6+6i+6j +6k

7+7i+7j +7k

At each step in either path, the future lightcone can b e represented bya

"Square Diagram" of lines connecting the future ends of the 4 future lightcone

links leading from the vertex at which the step b egins.

1ij +k 1i+j k

1+i+j +k 1+ij k

In the following subsections, protons, pions, and physical gravitons will

b e represented bymultiparticle paths.

The multiple particles representing protons, pions, and physical gravitons will

b e shown on sequences of such Square Diagrams, as well as by a sequence of co ordinates.

The co ordinate sequences will b e given only for a representative sequence of

timelike steps, with no space movement, b ecause

the notation for a timelike sequence is clearer and

it is easy to transform a sequence of timelike steps into a sequence of lightcone

link steps, as shown ab ove.

Only in the case of gravitons will it b e useful to explicitly discuss a path

that moves in space as well as time. 28

5.1 3-Quark Protons.

In this 4HD Feynman checkerb oard version of the D D E mo del,

4 5 6

protons are made up of 3 valence rst generation quarks, (two up quarks and

one down quark), with one Red, one Green, and one Blue in color.

The proton b ound state of 3 valence quarks has a soliton structure (see

WWW URL http://www.gatech.edu/tsmith/SolProton.html [13 ]).

The complicated structure of the sea quarks and binding gluons can b e

ignored in a 4HD Feynman checkerb oard approximation that uses the R, G,

and B valence quarks and path length L that is the Compton wave-

313GeV

length of the rst generation quark constituent mass.

The 4HD structure used to approximate the proton is the 3-link Rotating

Propagator of the thesis of Michael Gibbs [11]. 29

Here is a co ordinate sequence representation of the approximate 4HD

Feynman checkerb oard path of a proton:

R Quar k G Quar k B Quar k

1+ij k 1i+j k 1 ij +k

2i+j k 2ij +k 2+ij k

3ij +k 3+ij k 2 i+j k

4+ij k 4i+j k 4 ij +k

5i+j k 5ij +k 5+ij k

6ij +k 6+ij k 6 i+j k

7+ij k 7i+j k 7 ij +k

The following page contains a Square Diagram representation of the ap-

proximate 4HD Feynman checkerb oard path of a proton: 30

R 1 ij +k G 1i+j k

1+i+j +k B 1+ij k

B 1 ij +k R 1i+j k

1+i+j +k G 1+ij k

G 1ij +k B 1i+j k

1+i+j +k R 1+ij k

R 1 ij +k G 1i+j k

31

1+i+j +k B 1+ij k

5.2 Quark-AntiQuark Pions.

In this 4HD Feynman checkerb oard version of the D D E mo del, pions

4 5 6

are made up of rst generation valence Quark-AntiQuark pairs.

The pion b ound state of valence Quark-AntiQuark pairs has a soliton struc-

ture that would, pro jected onto a 2-dimensional spacetime, b e a Sine-Gordon

breather (see WWW URL http://www.gatech.edu/tsmith/SnGdnPion.html

[13]).

The complicated structure of the sea quarks and binding gluons can b e

ignored in a 4HD Feynman checkerb oard approximation that uses the va-

lence Quark and AntiQuark and path length L that is the Compton

313GeV

wavelength of the rst generation quark constituent mass.

The 4HD structure used to approximate the pion is the 2-link Exchange

Propagator. 32

Here is a co ordinate sequence representation of the approximate 4HD

Feynman checkerb oard path of a pion:

Quar k AntiQuar k

0 0

1+i+j +k 1i+j k

2 2

3+ij k 3 ij +k

4 4

5i+j k 5+i+j +k

6 6

7ij +k 7+ij k

8 8

9+i+j +k 9i+j k

10 10

11 + i j k 11 i j + k

12 12

13 i + j k 13 + i + j + k

14 14

15 i j + k 15 + i j k

16 16

The following page contains a Square Diagram representation of the ap-

proximate 4HD Feynman checkerb oard path of a pion: 33



1ij +k Q 1i+j k

Q 1+i+j +k 1+ij k



Q 1ij +k 1i+j k

1+i+j +k Q 1+ij k

1ij +k Q 1i+j k



Q 1+i+j +k 1+ij k

Q 1ij +k 1i+j k

34



1+i+j +k Q 1+ij k

5.3 Spin-2 Physical Gravitons.

In this 4HD Feynman checkerb oard version of the D D E mo del, spin-2

4 5 6

physical gravitons are made up of the 4 translation spin-1 gauge b osons of

the 10-dimensional S pin(5) de Sitter subgroup of the 15-dimensional S pin(6)

Conformal group used to construct Einstein-Hilb ert gravityintheD D

4 5

E mo del describ ed in hep-ph/9501252 and quant-ph/9503009 .

6

These spin-2 physical gravitons are massless, but they can have energy

up to and including the Planck mass.

The Planck energy spin-2 physical gravitons are really fundamental struc-

tures with 4HD Feynman checkerb oard path length L .

P lanck 35

Here is a co ordinate sequence representation of

the 4HD Feynman checkerb oard path of a fundamental

Planck-mass spin-2 physical graviton,

where T; X; Y; Z represent the 4 translation

generator of the S pin(5) de Sitter group:

T X Y Z

0 0 0 0

1+i+j +k 1+ij k 1 i+j k 1ij +k

2 2 2 2

3+i+j +k 3+ij k 3 i+j k 3ij +k

4 4 4 4

5+i+j +k 5+ij k 5 i+j k 5ij +k

6 6 6 6

7+i+j +k 7+ij k 7 i+j k 7ij +k

8 8 8 8

The following is a Square Diagram representation of the 4HD Feynman

checkerb oard path of a fundamental Planck-mass spin-2 physical graviton:

Z 1ij +k Y 1i+j k

T 1+i+j +k X 1+ij k

The representation ab ove is for a timelike path at rest in space. 36

With resp ect to gravitons, we can see something new and di erentby

letting the path move in space as well.

Let T and Y represent time and longitudinal space, and

X and Z represent transverse space.

Then, as discussed in Feynman's Lectures on Gravitation, pp. 41-42 [7],

the Square Diagram representation shows that our spin-2 physical graviton

is indeed a spin-2 particle.

transverse Z 1 i j + k longitudinal Y 1 i + j k

@ 

@

@

@

@R

@I

@

@

@

@

time T 1+i+j +k transverse X 1+ij k

Spin-2 physical gravitons of energy less than the Planck mass are more

complicated comp osite gauge b oson structures with approximate 4HD Feyn-

man checkerb oard path length L .

g r av itonener g y

They can b e deformed from a square shap e, but retain their spin-2 nature

as describ ed byFeynman [7]. 37

References

[1] J. Conway and N. Sloane, Sphere Packings, Lattices, and Groups, 2nd

ed, Springer-Verlag (1993).

[2] H. Coxeter, Regular Complex Polytopes, 2nd ed, Cambridge (1991).

[3] G. Dixon, Division algebras: , quaternions, complex numbers,

and the algebraic design of physics, Kluwer (1994).

[4] G. Dixon, X-product Orbits, hep-th/9410202 .

[5] G. Dixon, Octonion X-product and

Octonion E Lattices, hep-th/9411063.

8

[6] G. Dixon, Octonions: E Latticeto  , hep-th/9501007.

8 16

[7] R. Feynman, Lectures on Gravitation, 1962-63, Caltech (1971).

[8] R. Feynman, Notes on the Dirac Equation, Caltech archives, b ox 13,

folder 6 (1946).

[9] R. Feynman and Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals,

McGraw-Hill (1965).

[10] H. Gersch, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 20 (1981) 491.

[11] M. Gibbs, Spacetime as a Quantum Graph, Ph. D. thesis of J. Michael

Gibbs, with advisor David Finkelstein, Georgia Tech (1994).

[12] H. Hrgovcic, Quantum mechanics on space-time lattices using path in-

tegrals in a Minkowski metric, MIT Ph. D. thesis under T. To oli, July

1992.

[13] F. Smith, WWW URL http://www.gatech.edu/tsmith/home.html.

[14] F. Smith, Gravity and the StandardModel with 130 GeV Truth Quark

from D D E Model using 3  3 Octonion Matrices, preprint:

4 5 6

THEP-95-1; hep-ph/9501252.

[15] F. Smith, StandardModel plus Gravity from Octonion Creators and An-

nihilators, preprint: THEP-95-2; quant-th/9503009. 38