DOCSLIB.ORG

Constitutional Assembly Breakdown: a Study of Why Nepal’S Constitution Writing Procces Failed Evan Cooper Bates College, [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Constitutional Assembly Breakdown: a Study of Why Nepal’S Constitution Writing Procces Failed Evan Cooper Bates College, Ecooper2@Bates.Edu Bates College SCARAB Honors Theses Capstone Projects Spring 5-2015 Constitutional Assembly Breakdown: A Study of Why Nepal’s Constitution Writing Procces Failed Evan Cooper Bates College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scarab.bates.edu/honorstheses Recommended Citation Cooper, Evan, "Constitutional Assembly Breakdown: A Study of Why Nepal’s Constitution Writing Procces Failed" (2015). Honors Theses. 118. http://scarab.bates.edu/honorstheses/118 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Capstone Projects at SCARAB. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of SCARAB. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Constitutional Assembly Breakdown: A Study of Why Nepal’s Constitution Writing Process Failed A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Politics Bates College In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts by Evan Cooper Lewiston, Maine March 30, 2015 Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my Advisor, Professor Stephen Engel, without whom I could not have completed this project. I would also like to thank the Barlow Thesis Research Fund and the Bates Student Research Fund, who generously funded my travels to Nepal for the interview portion of my thesis. Finally I would like to thank all of my friends and my family who helped me through this process and were available to read my work and bounce ideas off of. ! ! ! II! Abstract! ! This thesis explores the elements that account for why Nepal has failed to draft a new constitution since the end of the civil war in 2006. This study is grounded in two main areas of existing literature. The first is the political economy of collective decision making with a focus on the challenges faced by large groups, such as legislative bodies. The second area of literature focuses more specifically on particular challenges to constitution-drafting or constituent assemblies. Predictions from these literature sources are then applied to a newspaper analysis of eKantipur headline articles from November 2006 to January 2015 to analyze which factors are present as impediments to the constitution process in Nepal. Supplemental interviews from December 2014 are also used in order to highlight how newspaper depictions of the constitutional impasse match with the reality of the Constituent Assembly process. This study finds that while numerous political problems suggested by existing scholars appear to be present in newspaper data, the root of the problem is a lack of legitimacy grounded in the leaders of the four major political parties of Nepal. This study also uses the Nepal case to theory test Andrew Arato’s model of Post Sovereign Constitution Making. Overall, Nepal’s constitution writing failure, which is due to problems of legitimacy, supports the caveats of Arato’s theory. ! ! ! ! ! III! ! ! Table&of&Contents& Introduction!..............................................................................................................................!1! Economic!Overview!of!Nepal!.........................................................................................................!3! Historical!Context!of!Nepal’s!Constitution!Process!................................................................!4! Outline!of!the!Current!Study!.......................................................................................................!15! Chapter!1:!Constitution!Writing!and!Its!Challenges:!An!Overview!of!Legal! Scholarship!..............................................................................................................................!21! Introduction!.....................................................................................................................................!21! The!Problems!of!Collective!Action!............................................................................................!23! ConstitutionLwriting!Normative!Literature!..........................................................................!27! ConstitutionLDrafting!in!practice:!Insights!from!two!Cases!.............................................!34! Post!Sovereign!Constitution!Making!........................................................................................!38! Conclusion!........................................................................................................................................!39! Chapter!2:!Media!Analysis:!Coverage!of!Constitutional!Delays!..............................!42! Introduction!.....................................................................................................................................!42! Collective!Action!Problems!.........................................................................................................!47! Lack!of!Institutions!........................................................................................................................!50! Substantive!Delays!.........................................................................................................................!53! Public!Participation!.......................................................................................................................!55! Problems!of!Legitimacy!................................................................................................................!57! Other!...................................................................................................................................................!61! Conclusion!........................................................................................................................................!61! ! Chapter!3:!Interview!Analysis:!A!Crisis!of!Power,!Trust!and!Legitimacy!............!63! Introduction!.....................................................................................................................................!63! Testing!the!Hypotheses!................................................................................................................!66! Constitutional!Delays!....................................................................................................................!72! Power!Grabs!.....................................................................................................................................!74! A!Fundamental!Lack!of!Trust!.....................................................................................................!79! A!Dearth!Of!Legitimacy!.................................................................................................................!84! Conclusion!........................................................................................................................................!88! Conclusion!................................................................................................................................!90! Bibliography!............................................................................................................................!95! Appendices!..............................................................................................................................!98! ! ! ! ! IV! Introduction In the fall of 2013, I spent the semester studying in Kathmandu, Nepal. While there, I conducted a study on the role of international actors in the constitution process and second Constituent Assembly election in November 2013. Despite the common rhetoric among political leaders that international actors were taking over and destroying the constitution process, my study, based on interview analysis, showed relatively little interference by the international community. The current study seeks to expand off of this research; since the common rhetoric is incorrect what does account for the failures of the constitution process? This study explores the factors that have led to the delay and failure of the creation of a new constitution in Nepal. This study explores an answer to the question of how might we account for why Nepal has thus far failed to draft a constitution? Chapter one begins with an examination of two literatures. The first addresses the political economy of collective decision making with emphasis on the challenges faced by large groups such as legislative bodies. The second focuses more specifically on particular challenges to constitution-drafting bodies or constituent assemblies. These bodies may be a special case insofar as the level of politics is heightened and thus collective action dilemmas may either be simply exacerbated because the stakes are higher or they may manifest themselves in a qualitatively distinct form. The level of politics in constitution making is heightened as explained by Barry Weingast in his work on self- enforcing constitutions.1 Based on an evaluation of this literature, five hypotheses were created to predict the factors that derailed the constitution process in Nepal. Hypothesis 1: Existing political institutions in Nepal are not strong enough to overcome collective action problems in the !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1 Barry Weingast. "Self-Enforcing Constitutions: With an Application to Democratic Stability In America’s First ! 1! legislative and drafting bodies. This will manifest in high transaction costs, a lack of clear committee system, or excessive negotiation time outside of the committee system. Hypothesis 2: There is a dearth of existing political institutions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Document Was Created from a File "F:\Countries\Nepal\2017\Report
    ELECTION OBSERVATION DELEGATION TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND PROVINCIAL ASSEMBLIES ELECTIONS IN NEPAL (26 November and 7 December 2017) Report by Neena Gill CBE, Head of the EP Delegation Annexes: A. List of participants and programme of the delegation B. European Parliament Election Observation Delegation Statement C. EU Election Observation Mission Preliminary findings and conclusions D. Press release by the EU EOM Introduction: Following an invitation from the Nepal authorities, the Conference of Presidents on 5 October 2017 authorised the sending of a delegation to observe the elections to the House of Representatives and provincial assemblies in Nepal. These elections were taking place in two phases on 26 November in the constituencies in the more mountainous districts and on 7 December in the remaining 45 constituencies. The European Parliament has always been a strong supporter of the process of democratic consolidation in Nepal following the civil war in the country in the early 2000s. It observed the elections in 2008 and 2013 and the sending of a further delegation was a sign of its ongoing commitment. EU financial assistance to Nepal has strengthened under the multiannual indicative programme for 2014-2020 which included support for democracy and good governance. Development aid amounts to €360 million, which is triple the amount for the previous budget period. At the constituent meeting on 19 October 2017 Ms Neena GILL CBE (S&D, UK) was elected head of the delegation that would observe both phases. For the first phase the delegation was also composed of Ivan STEFANEC (EPP, SK), Tomas ZDECHOVSKY (EPP, CZ), Norbert NEUSER (S&D, DE), Bernd LUCKE (ECR, DE), Javier NART (ALDE, ES), and Georg MAYER (ENF, AT).
    [Show full text]
  • Federalism Is Debated in Nepal More As an ‘Ism’ Than a System
    The FEDERALISM Debate in Nepal Post Peace Agreement Constitution Making in Nepal Volume II Post Peace Agreement Constitution Making in Nepal Volume II The FEDERALISM Debate in Nepal Edited by Budhi Karki Rohan Edrisinha Published by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal (SPCBN) 2014 United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal (SPCBN) UNDP is the UN’s global development network, advocating for change and connecting countries to knowledge, experience and resources to help people build a better life. United Nations Development Programme UN House, Pulchowk, GPO Box: 107 Kathmandu, Nepal Phone: +977 1 5523200 Fax: +977 1 5523991, 5523986 ISBN : 978 9937 8942 1 0 © UNDP, Nepal 2014 Book Cover: The painting on the cover page art is taken from ‘A Federal Life’, a joint publication of UNDP/ SPCBN and Kathmandu University, School of Art. The publication was the culmination of an initiative in which 22 artists came together for a workshop on the concept of and debate on federalism in Nepal and then were invited to depict their perspective on the subject through art. The painting on the cover art titled ‘’Emblem” is created by Supriya Manandhar. DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in the book are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of UNDP/ SPCBN. PREFACE A new Constitution for a new Nepal drafted and adopted by an elected and inclusive Constituent Assembly (CA) is a key element of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) of November 2006 that ended a decade long Maoist insurgency.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Experiences of Conflict, Violence and Peacebuilding in Nepal
    CASE STUDY ‘Aaba Hamro Paalo’ (It’s Our Time Now): Youth experiences of conflict, violence and peacebuilding in Nepal. Informing the Progress Study on Youth, Peace and Security and the Implementation of Security Council Resolution 2250. SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 Dr. Bhola Prasad Dahal Niresh Chapagain Country Director DMEA Manager Search for Common Ground, Nepal Search for Common Ground, Nepal Phone: +977 9851191666 Phone: +977 9801024762 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Case Study: Youth Consultations on Peace & Security in Nepal Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 5 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 9 3. Methodology and Description of Research Activities ............................................................................ 10 3.1 Objectives, Population of the Study and Key Research Questions ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal One Hundred Days After Royal Takeover and Human Rights Crisis Deepens February 1– May 11, 2005
    Nepal One Hundred Days after Royal Takeover and Human Rights Crisis Deepens February 1– May 11, 2005 12 May 2005 Published by Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA) This report is a compilation of contributions coming from different organizations and individuals, both within Nepal and outside. Due to security reasons, the names of the contributors, editors and their institutional affiliations are not disclosed. 2 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION 7 1.1 General overview of the country 7 1.1.1 Socio-political development 7 1.1.2 Human rights regime 9 1.1.2.1 Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal 1990 9 1.1.2.2 International human rights instruments 12 2.0 GROSS VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS 14 2.1 An overview of the violation of human rights after the royal-military takeover 14 2.1.1 Restrictions on media 15 2.1.2 Restrictions on travel 16 2.1.3 Violations by the Maoists 16 2.2 Constitutional and legal issues 17 2.2.1. Accountability 17 2.2.2 State of emergency 17 2.2.3 Legal standing of Government 19 2.2.4. Suppression of dissent 19 2.3 State of emergency and international obligations 19 2.3.1 Pre-conditions for declaring a state of emergency 20 2.3.2 Notification under ICCPR Article 4 21 2.4 Judiciary and constitutional institutions under trial 22 2.4.1 Royal Commission for Corruption Control (RCCC) 23 2.4.2 Violation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 24 2.4.3 Torture in detention 26 2.4.4 Judicial reluctance to engage in human rights protection 26 2.4.5 Militarization of the governance system
    [Show full text]
  • F OCHA Nepal - Fortnightly Situation Overview
    F OCHA Nepal - Fortnightly Situation Overview Issue No. 27, covering the period 13 -28 May 2008 Kathmandu, 28 May 2008 Highlights: • Constituent Assembly convenes on 28 May, declares Nepal a democratic republic; king Gyanendra to leave the palace • Food crisis hits remote areas in hills and mountains and fuel shortages adversely affect population • Operational space restricted in some areas by security concerns, including a second attack on an IOM transport • Armed Terai groups increase level of violence, with frequent IEDs, abductions and killings • Negotiations on forming a new government face major hurdles • Bandh in Kathmandu Valley and protests following PLA killing of a Kathmandu businessman • Due to the lack of textbooks and related protests, schools close down for two weeks CONTEXT ceremonial president after the abolition of monarchy, and to amending the interim constitution so that a government can be Political situation formed and removed through a simple majority in the CA. The Terai Madhesh Democratic Party (TMDP) was also expected to Constituent Assembly convenes, republic declared join this agreement. Following a swearing in ceremony of newly elected members On 22 May Senior NC leader and former prime minister Sher on 27 May and under tight security arrangements, and after Bahadur Deuba ruled out his party's involvement in the to-be- more hours of delay, the first session of the Constituent formed government and the possibility of a working alliance Assembly (CA) convened at the Birendra International with Maoists if the latter failed to address the NC‘s seven-point Convention Centre (BICC), Naya Baneshwor, in Kathmandu in demands issued earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining Political Transitions in Nepal Prakash Adhikari
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Himalayan Research Papers Archive Nepal Study Center 10-9-2007 Pursuing Democracy: Explaining Political Transitions in Nepal Prakash Adhikari James D. Timberlake Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nsc_research Recommended Citation Adhikari, Prakash and James D. Timberlake. "Pursuing Democracy: Explaining Political Transitions in Nepal." (2007). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nsc_research/15 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nepal Study Center at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Himalayan Research Papers Archive by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pursuing Democracy: Explaining Political Transitions in Nepal Prakash Adhikari and James D. Timberlake University of New Mexico Paper prepared for presentation at the Second Annual Himalayan Policy Research Conference 36th South Asian Conference, University of Wisconsin-Madison, (October 11, 2007). This is a working paper; please do not cite or quote. Pursuing Democracy: Explaining Political Transitions in Nepal Prakash Adhikari and James D. Timberlake University of New Mexico Nepal has been struggling to consolidate a democratic political system for more than a half-century yet still does not have a working constitution. This paper is the first step in a larger research project examining regime transitions in Nepal. We review the existent comparative literature on democratization and authoritarian reversals in order to isolate some potential explanatory variables. We also focus on making valid descriptive inferences along these conceptual lines. What caused the failure of democracy in Nepal in the past? What are the future prospects for democratic consolidation? The literature has been divided along two lines, which we label as the Weberian and Neo-Marxist research programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Impunity and Political Accountability in Nepal Impunity and Political Accountability in Nepal in Accountability Political and Impunity
    Aditya Adhikari and Bhaskar Gautam and Bhaskar Adhikari Aditya Impunity and Political Accountability in Nepal Impunity and Political Accountability in Nepal Aditya Adhikari and Bhaskar Gautam with Surabhi Pudasaini and Bhadra Sharma G.P.O. Box 935 Bhat Bhateni Kathmandu, Nepal www.asiafoundation.org Technical and financial support for this publication has been provided by The Asia Foundation, with funding from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Government of Australia. Views and opinions expressed in this publication are of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of The Asia Foundation or of the Government of Australia. The Politics of Impunity i Impunity and Political Accountability in Nepal ii Impunity and Political Accountability in Nepal The Politics of Impunity iii Impunity and Political Accountability in Nepal By Aditya Adhikari and Bhaskar Gautam with Surabhi Pudasaini and Bhadra Sharma iv Impunity and Political Accountability in Nepal The Politics of Impunity v Contents Preface ix Chapter 1: The Politics of Impunity 1 Chapter 2: The Ministry of Peace and Reconstruction 20 Chapter 3: The Commission for the Investigation of Abuse of Authority 29 Chapter 4: Politics and Criminality in Biratnagar 40 Chapter 5: Transitional Justice 57 Conclusion 79 Annex 84 References 97 vi Impunity and Political Accountability in Nepal The Politics of Impunity vii Foreword “Impunity and Political Accountability in Nepal” is the fourth of a series of reports published by The Asia Foundation since 1999 that document impunity in Nepal. Prior reports provided analyses of the causes and scale of impunity in the context of conflict and political instability during the late 1990s; political corruption and violation of human rights during 2004 - 2006; and the state of impunity prior to and immediately after Jana Anadolan II during 2006 -2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Revolution and End of the Cultural Institution In
    RESEARCHER I II JULY- DECEMBER 2013 11 MASS REVOLUTION AND END OF THE CULTURAL INSTITUTION IN NEPAL Apar Kumar Lamsal Tribhuvan University [email protected] Abstract From 6th April to 24th April of 2006, parliamentary political parties along with the ten years long strafing underground Nepal Communist Party (Maoists) stage a mass revolution against the Royal takeover of 2002 AD for the establishment of republican state. This mass movement gained much impetus then trailed by various organizations, trade unions, students, professional employees and the general mass throughout the kingdom of Nepal. Ultimately, the age-long monarchical institution was finished from the political and cultural scenario of Nepal. This article outlines the main events and outcomes of this revolution and analyzes it. This article is based on secondary sources along with event observation. Key words: mass revolution, monarchy, political parties Background of the Mass Revolution After the restablishment of parliamentary democracy system in 1990AD, the people of Nepal had a hope and trust in peoples participation and more freedom. The also had hoped that the people's representatives government would give freedom, relief, peace, development and security but due to political instability, corruption, lack of understanding among major political parties, failure to maintain law and order and security, the political parties failed to secure the trust and support of the people. At this crucial moment, the Royal massacre of Birendra's family and enthronement of a king RESEARCHER I II JULY- DECEMBER 2013 12 Gyanendra abruptly dismissed the people's elected „House of Representative‟ on May 22, 2002 and the Government on Oct 4, 2002 and took the country's rule by appointing the council of minister according to his own will.
    [Show full text]
  • The Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist): Transformation from an Insurgency Group to a Competitive Political Party
    The Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist): Transformation from an Insurgency Group to a Competitive Political Party Krishna Hachhethu Our party has adopted a resolution on the ‘development of democracy in the 21st century’ and put forward some new theses. Among others, the most important thesis has been to accept and organize a multiparty competition within a stipulated constitutional framework even in the future socialist state. This idea of multiparty competition within a socialist state is a big step forward in the revitalization and the development of a socialist democracy. Prachanda, Chairman of the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)1 Introduction The April 2006 movement was remarkable not only because it ended monarchical rule in Nepal but also because it marked the beginning of the transformation of the Communist Party of Nepal, Maoist or CPN (Maoist) from an insurgent group to a competitive political party. The transformation started when the CPN (Maoist) made a categorical commitment to the multiparty system and peaceful politics, a commitment that was documented in the 12-point understanding reached between the Seven Party Alliance (SPA) and the CPN (Maoist) in November 2005. This understanding provided the basis for an unprecedented 19-day- long mass movement, Jana Andolan II, in which four to five million people participated, and which led to a series of important political developments: the reinstatement of the dissolved House of Representatives (HOR) on 24 April; the declaration on 18 May, which called for the election of a Constituent Assembly (CA); the temporary suspension of the monarchy; the formation of the SPA government on 27 April, with G.P.
    [Show full text]
  • 6269 South Asia 070104.Indd
    Political Parties in South Asia: Th e Challenge of Change South Asia Regional Report Based on research and dialogue with political parties Political Parties in South Asia: Th e Challenge of Change South Asia Regional Report Based on research and dialogue with political parties Lead Author: K. C. Suri Nagarjuna University India International IDEA Research and Dialogue Coordination: Roger Hällhag Head of the Political Parties Programme Sakuntala Kadirgamar-Rajasingham Head of the South Asia Programme Maja Tjernström Programme Offi cer, Political Parties Programme James Gomez Programme Offi cer, Political Parties Programme About this report Political parties are indispensable for making democracy work and deliver. Finding the proper conditions for the better internal functioning and effective legal regulation of political parties is of key importance anywhere. This report is the result of worldwide research and dialogue with political parties. Together with national and regional research partners, International IDEA is improving insight and comparative knowledge. The purpose is to provide for constructive public debate and reform actions helping political parties to develop. For more about the Political Parties programme, please visit http://www.idea.int/parties. Political Parties in South Asia: The Challenge of Change © International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance 2007 This is an International IDEA publication. International IDEA publications are independent of specifi c national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA, its Board or its Council members. Applications for permission to reproduce or translate all or any part of this publication should be made to: Publications Offi ce International IDEA SE 103 34 Stockholm Sweden International IDEA encourages dissemination of its work and will promptly respond to requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study on Nepal Observations and Reflections on the Peace and Constitution-Making Process
    Case Study on Nepal Observations and Reflections on the Peace and Constitution-Making Process Bishnu Raj Upreti, Research Director, Nepal Centre for Contemporary Research (NCCR), Kathmandu/Nepal Bishnu Sapkota, Founding General Secretary and Member of Board of Directors, Nepal Transition to Peace (NTTP) Institute, Kathmandu/Nepal Imprint Acknowledgement from the authors We would like to extend our sincere appreciation to all the interviewees, without whom this study would not have been possible. The list is too long to include here but we would like to thank all of them for their valuable time, openness during the discussion/interactions, and for sharing precious information and insights with us for this study. Similarly, we owe special thanks to two of our research colleagues: Ms Sharmila Shivakoti (former Research Officer at the NCCR and final year Master's student in Gender Studies) for supporting Bishnu Raj Upreti in collecting and scanning literature, making appointments, accompanying him to many of the meetings and taking notes, transcribing them, arranging transport and formatting the report. Similar support was provided by Mr. Lokendra KC, researcher at the NTTP Institute, who assisted Bishnu Sapkota in making interviews and provided other general research support. We would also like to thank Mr. Suman Babu Paudel (Peace Researcher at NCCR) for his review and assistance in design and formatting. Last but not least, we express our sincere thanks to Dr Andrea Iff, who connected us to this study, and Ms Corinne von Burg, coordinator of this study, who was flexible and open not only to ideas but also to the time schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Violence in South and Southeast Asia
    United Nations University Press is the publishing arm of the United Nations University. UNU Press publishes scholarly and policy-oriented books and periodicals on the issues facing the United Nations and its peoples and member states, with particular emphasis upon international, regional and transboundary policies. The United Nations University was established as a subsidiary organ of the United Nations by General Assembly resolution 2951 (XXVII) of 11 December 1972. It functions as an international community of scholars engaged in research, postgraduate training and the dissemination of knowledge to address the pressing global problems of human survival, development and welfare that are the concern of the United Nations and its agencies. Its activities are devoted to advancing knowledge for human security and development and are focused on issues of peace and governance and environment and sustainable development. The Univer- sity operates through a worldwide network of research and training centres and programmes, and its planning and coordinating centre in Tokyo. Political violence in South and Southeast Asia Political violence in South and Southeast Asia: Critical perspectives Edited by Itty Abraham, Edward Newman and Meredith L. Weiss © United Nations University, 2010 The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not neces- sarily reflect the views of the United Nations University. United Nations University Press United Nations University, 53-70, Jingumae 5-chome, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 150-8925, Japan Tel: +81-3-5467-1212 Fax: +81-3-3406-7345 E-mail: [email protected] general enquiries: [email protected] http://www.unu.edu United Nations University Office at the United Nations, New York 2 United Nations Plaza, Room DC2-2062, New York, NY 10017, USA Tel: +1-212-963-6387 Fax: +1-212-371-9454 E-mail: [email protected] United Nations University Press is the publishing division of the United Nations University.
    [Show full text]