DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix G Historical Resources Report, DPR Forms, and Native American Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix G Historical Resources Report, DPR Forms, and Native American Consultation Appendix G Historical Resources Report, DPR Forms, and Native American Consultation HISTORICAL RESOURCES IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT _______________________________________ Sacramento Entertainment and Sports Complex Project Prepared for: Environmental Science Associates (ESA) 2600 Capitol Ave, Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95816 Prepared by: JRP Historical Consulting, LLC 2850 Spafford Street Davis, California 95618 October 2013 Historical Resources Impact Analysis Report: Sacramento Entertainment and Sports Complex TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 2. RESEARCH AND METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................... 3 2.1. SACRAMENTO’S RAISED STREETS AND UNDERGROUND (HOLLOW) SIDEWALKS ........................................ 6 3. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................... 11 3.1. EARLY SACRAMENTO ................................................................................................................................ 11 3.2. THE WEST END ......................................................................................................................................... 12 3.3. WEST END DECLINE .................................................................................................................................. 15 3.4. WEST END REDEVELOPMENT .................................................................................................................... 17 3.5. COMMERCIAL REDEVELOPMENT OF THE WEST END ................................................................................. 22 3.5.1. Macy’s ................................................................................................................................................. 24 3.5.2. K Street Pedestrian Mall ...................................................................................................................... 28 3.5.3. Downtown Plaza Shopping Center ...................................................................................................... 30 4. DESCRIPTION OF RESOURCES ........................................................................................................... 46 4.1. HISTORICAL RESOURCES ........................................................................................................................... 47 4.1.1. California Fruit Building ..................................................................................................................... 47 4.1.2. Travelers’ Hotel ................................................................................................................................... 48 4.1.3. Ramona Hotel ...................................................................................................................................... 49 4.1.4. Hotel Marshall (Hotel Clayton) ........................................................................................................... 50 4.2. RESOURCES REQUIRING EVALUATION ...................................................................................................... 51 4.2.1. Macy’s ................................................................................................................................................. 51 4.2.2. Jade Apartments .................................................................................................................................. 52 4.2.3. Downtown Plaza Shopping Center ...................................................................................................... 53 5. EVALUATION OF RESOURCES ............................................................................................................ 56 5.1. EVALUATION CRITERIA ............................................................................................................................. 56 5.1.1. NRHP Criteria of Significance ............................................................................................................ 56 5.1.2. CRHR Criteria of Significance ............................................................................................................ 58 5.1.3. City of Sacramento Criteria of Significance ........................................................................................ 59 5.2. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................... 60 6. IMPACTS ANALYSIS AND MITIGATION MEASURES .................................................................... 62 6.1. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS TO HISTORICAL RESOURCES .......................................... 62 6.1.1. Criteria ................................................................................................................................................ 62 6.2. IMPACTS ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................... 63 6.2.1. California Fruit Building – 1000 & 1006 4th Street ............................................................................. 63 6.2.2. Travelers’ Hotel – 428 J Street & 1010 5th Street ................................................................................ 64 6.2.3. Ramona Hotel – 600 J Street & 1007 6th Street ................................................................................... 64 6.2.4. Hotel Marshall (Hotel Clayton) – 1122, 1126, 1128 7th Street ............................................................ 65 6.3. MITIGATION MEASURES .................................................................................................................... 67 6.3.1. Hotel Marshall ..................................................................................................................................... 67 7. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................ 70 8. PREPARERS’ QUALIFICATIONS ......................................................................................................... 81 APPENDICES Appendix A: Maps Appendix B: DPR 523 Forms i Historical Resources Impact Analysis Report: Sacramento Entertainment and Sports Complex SUMMARY OF FINDINGS This Historical Resources Impact Analysis report is for the Sacramento Entertainment and Sports Center (ESC) Project in Sacramento, California. Pioneer Law Group (PLG), Sacramento Basketball Holdings, JMA Ventures, and Fulcrum Properties (Project Proponents) propose to construct an arena that meets National Basketball Association (NBA) standards, along with multiple commercial, office, residential, and office buildings, at the Downtown Plaza property in Sacramento. JRP Historical Consulting, LLC (JRP) prepared this report under subcontract with Environmental Science Associates (ESA), which is preparing the environmental documentation for project compliance under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project location is depicted in Figure 1, Appendix A and the project vicinity map is shown in Figure 2, Appendix A. The study area for this report encompasses the eight-block area bounded by 3rd Street on the west, 7th Street on the east, J Street on the north, and L Street on the south that includes the property to be transferred to the Project Proponents. The study area map is shown in Figure 3, Appendix A with map reference (MR) numbers of properties studied for this report. This report identifies historic architectural resources in the study area that are considered historical resources, assesses the potential impact the Sacramento ESC Project may have on historical resources, and suggests mitigation measures to avoid or reduce the project impacts on historical resources, in accordance with Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. As defined in Section 5024.1 of the California Public Resources Code, historical resources are those properties that are properties listed in, determined eligible for listing in, or that appear eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). Properties listed in or formally determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) are automatically eligible for listing in the CRHR. Historical resources for this project also include properties that are listed in or are eligible for listing in the Sacramento Register of Historic and Cultural Resources (Sacramento Register), under the City of Sacramento Municipal Code, Chapter 17.604 (formerly Chapter 17.134). The Sacramento ESC Project study area includes four historic landmarks listed in the Sacramento Register that are adjacent to the property to be transferred to the Project Proponent. These are the California Fruit Building (MR 1) Travelers’ Hotel (MR 2), Ramona Hotel (MR 3), and the Hotel Marshall (MR 4). JRP inventoried three other properties in the study area to identify whether they are historical resources and concluded that none of these properties should be considered historical for purposes of CEQA compliance. The landmarks and inventoried properties are identified on Figure 3, Appendix
Load more

Recommended publications
  • November 20, 2017 Ms. Lisa Trifiletti Trifiletti Consulting, Inc. 1541
    233 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 150 Santa Monica, CA 90401 310.451.4488 phrn·i;:, 310.451.5279 fax November 20, 2017 Ms. Lisa Trifiletti Trifiletti Consulting, Inc. 1541 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 560 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Subject: ESA's Statement of Qualifications for the Proposed Clippers Arena in the City of Inglewood, California Dear Ms. Trifiletti: The City of Inglewood's continued revitalization is tied in part to its emerging role as a sports and entertainment destination. This transformation began with the opening of the newly renovated Forum Arena in 2014, continued by the current construction of the Rams/Chargers Stadium, soon to be the largest in the nation, and would culminate with development of the Clippers Arena. From the perspective of the Clippers, a new arena in Inglewood will eliminate the scheduling challenges posed by sharing the Staples Center with the Lakers, Sparks, and NHL Kings. Further, by building a state-of-the-art, privately funded arena, the Clippers can influence every aspect of the game-day experience, including parking, logistics, food, seating, commerce, broadcasting, and much more. While a new arena will have benefits to both the Clippers and the City, this project will be pursued under the extremely watchful eye of the owners of the Forum, who see th is as direct competition to their operations; nearby private business, who would be required to give up land forthe arena; and local residents, who have voiced concerns about gentrification and rising rents. Accordingly, both the City and the Clippers require an environmental consulting firm who has an unmatched portfolio of preparing Environmental Impact Reports (El Rs) for high-profile sports stadiums and arenas, and an outstanding track-record for legal defensibility.
    [Show full text]
  • LN PR Template
    JANET JACKSON ANNOUNCES 2ND NORTH AMERICAN LEG TO "UNBREAKABLE WORLD TOUR" - Due To Overwhelming Fan Demand, 27 New Cities Added - –Tickets For 2nd Leg Of Tour On Sale Starting July 20 at JanetJackson.com – LOS ANGELES (July 13, 2015) – Janet's Jackson's tour is not only UNBREAKABLE, it is now unstoppable thanks to her fans across North America. The recent BET Awards’ Ultimate Icon honoree, multiple GRAMMY® Award-winner and multi-platinum selling artist announced a 2nd North American leg to her UNBREAKABLE WORLD TOUR with an additional 27 new cities added to what has become one of the most highly-anticipated international tours. Janet has been listening to her fans and their overwhelming response to both her new music and her tour. They've asked her to bring the UNBREAKABLE WORLD TOUR to their city and now she's giving even more fans a chance to be part of this year's most exciting tour. The 2nd leg of the North American tour will kick off on January 12, 2016 in Portland, OR and will visit 27 cities including dates in New York City, Washington DC, Boston, Houston, Dallas, Philadelphia and more! A full list of dates on the 2nd leg of the UNBREAKABLE WORLD TOUR is below. All dates on the tour are being co-produced by Miss Jackson’s Rhythm Nation. Additional worldwide concerts will be announced at a later date. Fans who pre-order the album on JanetJackson.com will receive presale access for premium seating beginning July 14 at 10:00 a.m. until July 19 at 10:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleveland Cavaliers (22-20) Vs
    WED., JAN. 21, 2015 QUICKEN LOANS ARENA – CLEVELAND, OH TV: FSO RADIO: WTAM 1100 AM/100.7 WMMS/LA MEGA 87.7 FM 7:00 PM EST CLEVELAND CAVALIERS (22-20) VS. UTAH JAZZ (14-27) 2014-15 CLEVELAND CAVALIERS GAME NOTES REGULAR SEASON GAME #43 HOME GAME #22 PROBABLE STARTERS 2014-15 SCHEDULE POS NO. PLAYER HT. WT. G GS PPG RPG APG FG% MPG 10/30 vs. NYK Lost, 90-95 10/31 @ CHI WON, 114-108* F 23 LEBRON JAMES 6-8 250 14-15: 33 33 26.0 5.5 7.3 .493 37.6 11/4 @ POR Lost, 82-101 11/5 @ UTA Lost, 100-102 11/7 @ DEN WON, 110-101 F 0 KEVIN LOVE 6-10 243 14-15: 40 40 17.6 10.4 2.3 .429 35.6 11/10 vs. NOP WON, 118-111 11/14 @ BOS WON, 122-121 11/15 vs. ATL WON, 127-94 C 20 TIMOFEY MOZGOV 7-1 250 14-15: 41 40 8.7 8.0 0.4 .509 25.7 11/17 vs. DEN Lost, 97-106 11/19 vs. SAS Lost, 90-92 11/21 @ WAS Lost, 78-91 G 5 J.R. SMITH 6-6 225 14-15: 31 12 11.7 2.5 3.0 .412 27.4 11/22 vs. TOR Lost, 93-110 11/24 vs. ORL WON, 106-74 G 2 KYRIE IRVING 6-3 193 14-15: 39 39 21.1 3.1 5.3 .459 38.3 11/26 vs. WAS WON, 113-87 11/29 vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Offices of THOMAS N
    Law Offices of THOMAS N. LIPPE, APC 201 Mission Street Telephone: 415-777-5604 12th Floor Facsimile: 415-777-5606 San Francisco, California 94105 Email: [email protected] July 27, 2015 Ms Tiffany Bohee OCII Executive Director c/o Mr. Brett Bollinger San Francisco Planning Department 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103 [email protected] Re: Transportation Impacts - Comments on Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Event Center and Mixed Use Development at Mission Bay Blocks 29-32 (Warriors Arena Project); San Francisco Planning Department Case No. 2014.1441E; State Clearinghouse No. 2014112045 Dear Ms Bohee and Mr. Bollinger: This office represents the Mission Bay Alliance (“Alliance”), an organization dedicated to preserving the environment in the Mission Bay area of San Francisco, regarding the project known as the Event Center and Mixed Use Development at Mission Bay Blocks 29-32 (“Warriors Arena Project” or “Project”). The Mission Bay Alliance objects to approval of this Project and certification of this EIR for the reasons stated in this letter. This letter incorporates by reference, as comments on the DSEIR, all of the comments on the DSEIR contained in the July 23, 2015, letter report authored by traffic engineer Dan Smith (attached as Exhibit 1), and the July 21, 2015, letter report authored by traffic engineer Larry Wymer (attached as Exhibit 2). I. THE DSEIR IS NOT SUFFICIENT AS AN INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS. A. The DSEIR Fails to Assess the Project Traffic Impacts on the Entire Affected Environment. The DSEIR studies Project-induced increases in congestion and delay, for both incremental and cumulative impacts, at twenty-two (22) intersections and six (6) freeway ramps, as shown in Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of a Career Advancement Program In
    EVALUATION OF A CAREER ADVANCEMENT PROGRAM IN PROFESSIONAL SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT A Project Presented to the faculty of the Department of Psychology California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in Industrial-Organizational Psychology by Taylor Dianne Wolgamott FALL 2020 © 2020 Taylor Dianne Wolgamott ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii EVALUATION OF A CAREER ADVANCEMENT PROGRAM IN PROFESSIONAL SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT A Project by Taylor Dianne Wolgamott Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Dr. Oriel Strickland __________________________________, Second Reader Dr. Gregory Hurtz ____________________________ Date iii Student: Taylor Dianne Wolgamott I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and this project is suitable for electronic submission to the library and credit is to be awarded for the project. __________________________, Graduate Coordinator ___________________ Dr. Lisa M. Bohon Date Department of Psychology iv Abstract of EVALUATION OF A CAREER ADVANCEMENT PROGRAM IN PROFESSIONAL SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT by Taylor Dianne Wolgamott The purpose of this action research project is to evaluate and provide recommendations for an existing career advancement program at the Sacramento Kings organization. The Career Advancement Program (CAP) has been in the organization for many years but was revamped to accommodate members from all departments in the organization. A program evaluation is needed to determine what changes need to be made to ensure its effectiveness. Twenty team members were recruited to participate in the program and a survey was developed to determine areas of the program that need improvement. Analyses show increased training and workshops, increased knowledge of the organization, and mentorship are areas for improvement.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento Case Study Paper
    BIGGER THAN BASKETBALL: Mayor Kevin Johnson and the Fight to Save the Sacramento Kings Athen Moore, Erika Resnick, Koba Sebiskveradze and Orin Wexler NYU Tisch Center For Hospitality, Tourism, and Sports Management Final Project for Consulting Strategies Course | Lee Igel, Professor Client: Kunal Merchant, Think BIG Sacramento December 2012 1 Acknowledgments We would like to express our deepest appreciation and thanks to the following people who provided the useful information and insights utilized throughout this case study: Mayor Kevin Johnson, Mayor of Sacramento Kunal Merchant, Executive Director of Think BIG Tom McClimon, Managing Director at U.S. Conference of Mayors Greg Nickels, Former Mayor of Seattle Blake Ellington, Co-Founder of Here We Stay campaign Bob Graswich, Mayoral aide & former Sacramento Bee columnist Kevin Nagle, Local business owner Steve Hammond, President & CEO of Sacramento CVB Tim Romani, President & CEO of ICON Venue Group Dave Taylor, Sacramento Developer 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................. 1 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Sacramento Kings: The Early Years ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oracle Arena from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Coordinates: 37°45′1″N 122°12′11″W Oracle Arena From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Oracle Arena (originally Oakland­Alameda County Coliseum Arena, formerly The Arena in Oakland and Oracle Arena Oakland Arena and commonly Oakland Coliseum Arena) is an indoor arena located in Oakland, California. It is the home of the Golden State Warriors. It has a capacity of 19,596, making it the largest of the three NBA arenas in California by capacity, with the Staples Center in Los Angeles (the current home of both the Lakers and Clippers) second and the Sleep Train Arena in Sacramento third. It is the oldest arena in the NBA. Contents 1 History Former Oakland­Alameda County Coliseum names Arena (1966–96) 1.1 Home franchises The Arena in Oakland (1997–2005) 1.2 Renovation Oakland Arena (2005–06) Location 7000 Coliseum Way 1.3 The Oracle Oakland, CA 94621 Coordinates 37°45′1″N 122°12′11″W 1.4 Attendance records Public Oakland Coliseum Station 2 The Future transit Owner Oakland­Alameda County Coliseum 3 Seating capacity Authority Operator AEG 3.1 Notable events Capacity Basketball: 19,596 4 See also Concert: 20,000 Ice hockey: 13,601 (1966–1997), 5 References 17,200 (1997–2018) Construction 6 External links Broke April 15, 1964 ground November 9, 1966 History Opened Renovated 1996–97 Home franchises Construction $25 million (original) cost ($191 million in 2015 dollars[1])[2] The arena has been the home to the Golden State $121 million (1996–97 renovation) [3] Warriors since 1971, except the one­year hiatus while the ($183 million in 2015 dollars[1]) arena was undergoing renovations.
    [Show full text]
  • Vvyx Network Connectivity Owned Network Leased Network
    Vyvx Availability at North American Sports Venues Vvyx Network connectivity Edmonton Owned Network Leased Network Calgary ANAHEIM, CA Angel Stadium SACRAMENTO, CA Honda Center Sleep Train Arena Winnipeg ARLINGTON, TX Vancouver ST. LOUIS, MO AT&T Stadium Busch Stadium Globe Life Park in Arlington Scottrade Center ATLANTA, GA ST. PAUL, MN Georgia Dome Xcel Energy Center Turner Field Seattle Philips Arena ST. PETERSBURG, FL McCamish Pavilion Tropicana Field Bobby Dodd Stadium SALT LAKE CITY, UT AUSTIN, TX Vivint Smart Home Arena D K Royal - Texas Memorial Stadium Rio Tinto Stadium Ottawa Montreal Portland Huntsman Center BALTIMORE, MD Minneapolis St. Paul Rice Eccles Stadium M&T Bank Stadium Green Bay Oriole Park at Camden Yards Corvalis SAN ANTONIO, TX Eugene AT&T Center BATON ROUGE, LA Toronto Alamodome Alex Box Stadium Tiger Stadium Milwaukee SAN DIEGO, CA Maravich Center Buffalo Qualcomm Stadium Boston Petco Park BOSTON, MA Detroit Fenway Park Hartford SANTA CLARA, CA Iowa City Chicago Providence Gillette Stadium Omaha Levi’s Stadium Cleveland TD Garden South Bend East Rutherford Uniondale Lincoln SAN FRANCISCO, CA BOULDER, CO Salt Lake City Newark AT&T Park Columbus State College New York Folsom Field Boulder Indianapolis Coors Event Center Pittsburgh SAN JOSE, CA Philadelphia SAP Center Denver Kansas City BUFFALO, NY Cincinnati Baltimore Avaya Stadium Ralph Wilson Stadium Sacramento First Niagara Center Washington, D.C. SEATTLE, WA St. Louis Louisville San Francisco CenturyLink Field CALGARY, ALBERTA Oakland Charlottesville Safeco Field
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 YEAR END Worldwide Ticket Sales TOP 200 ARENA VENUES 1-10 0
    2015 YEAR END Worldwide Ticket Sales TOP 200 ARENA VENUES 1-10 0 1 1,819,487 The O2 - London London, UNITED KINGDOM 51 325,171 Allphones Arena Sydney, AUSTRALIA 2 1,130,794 Manchester Arena Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM 52 319,344 Talking Stick Resort Arena Phoenix, AZ 3 1,021,038 The SSE Hydro Glasgow, UNITED KINGDOM 53 316,073 Tempodrom Berlin, GERMANY 4 1,013,453 Madison Square Garden Arena New York, NY 54 313,835 Qantas Credit Union Arena Darling Harbour, AUSTRALIA 5 821,475 Ziggo Dome Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS 55 310,569 Oracle Arena Oakland, CA 6 802,031 Arena Ciudad De Mexico Mexico City, MEXICO 56 309,569 KFC Yum! Center Louisville, KY 7 733,433 Lanxess Arena Cologne, GERMANY 57 296,226 Target Center Minneapolis, MN 8 671,092 Barclays Center Brooklyn, NY 58 296,123 Rogers Arena Vancouver, CANADA 9 643,845 Air Canada Centre Toronto, CANADA 59 293,870 BOK Center Tulsa, OK 10 632,878 Allstate Arena Rosemont, IL 60 283,773 Valley View Casino Center San Diego, CA 11 627,613 Forum Inglewood, CA 61 278,217 Moda Center Portland, OR 12 614,557 Bridgestone Arena Nashville, TN 62 267,194 Vector Arena Auckland, NEW ZEALAND 13 610,387 Staples Center Los Angeles, CA 63 265,725 Pepsi Center Denver, CO 14 605,667 AmericanAirlines Arena Miami, FL 64 261,471 Amway Center Orlando, FL 15 591,423 3Arena Dublin, IRELAND 65 256,081 Forest National Brussels, BELGIUM 16 570,018 Arena Monterrey Monterrey, MEXICO 66 248,470 Canadian Tire Centre Ottawa, CANADA 17 554,612 Philips Arena Atlanta, GA 67 235,542 Brisbane Entertainment Centre Boondall, AUSTRALIA 18
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical by Facility NAME Food Facility Award of Excellence Recipient List for 2014
    Food Facility Award of Excellence Recipient List for 2014 for Most Recent 3 Regular Inspections during Period of Eligibility 7/1/2011 - 6/30/2014 Alphabetical by Facility NAME County of Sacramento Environmental Health Division Environmental Management Department (916) 875-8440 10590 Armstrong Avenue www.emd.saccounty.net Facility Facility Mather, CA 95655 Census Supervisor Program Category: Name Addess Tract District Award Category 16 ST DONUTS 1601 F ST, SACRAMENTO 95814 05.00 1 1622: Full Food Preparation 25 MAIN STREET DELI 25 MAIN ST, ISLETON 95641 98.00 5 1623: Limited Food Preparation 524 RESTAURANT #3 2377 NORTHGATE BLVD, SACRAMENTO 95833 70.07 1 1622: Full Food Preparation 7 ELEVEN #2365-34677 6035 SAN JUAN AVE, CITRUS HEIGHTS 95610 81.19 4 1623: Limited Food Preparation 7 ELEVEN #2365-35351 6955 WALERGA RD, SACRAMENTO 95842 74.02 3 1623: Limited Food Preparation 7-ELEVEN FOOD STORE #23615-C2235 348 ELKHORN BLVD, RIO LINDA 95673 72.08 4 1623: Limited Food Preparation 99 CENTS ONLY STORES #0233 9415 MADISON AVE, ORANGEVALE 95662 82.06 4 1613: Retail Market 99 RANCH MARKET 4220 FLORIN RD, SACRAMENTO 95823 49.04 2 1622: Full Food Preparation 99 RANCH MARKET 4220 FLORIN RD, SACRAMENTO 95823 49.04 2 1652: Limited Food Preparation ABOUT A BITE BAKERY 11353 PYRITES WAY #1, RANCHO CORDOVA 95670 87.03 4 1622: Full Food Preparation AFC SUSHI @ BEL AIR #524 2760 E BIDWELL ST, FOLSOM 95630 85.10 4 1622: Full Food Preparation AFC SUSHI @ RALEY'S #409 715 E BIDWELL ST, FOLSOM 95630 84.03 4 1623: Limited Food Preparation AFC SUSHI @ RALEY'S
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Ticket Sales TOP 200 ARENA VENUES 1-100
    2015 3Q YTD Worldwide Ticket Sales TOP 200 ARENA VENUES 1-100 1 1,235,033 The O2 - London London, UNITED KINGDOM 51 207,229 Allphones Arena Sydney, AUSTRALIA 2 824,381 Manchester Arena Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM 52 204,932 Amway Center Orlando, FL 3 667,322 The SSE Hydro Glasgow, UNITED KINGDOM 53 204,782 Target Center Minneapolis, MN 4 595,954 Arena Ciudad De Mexico Mexico City, MEXICO 54 197,865 Oracle Arena Oakland, CA 5 576,768 Madison Square Garden Arena New York, NY 55 192,872 Moda Center Portland, OR 6 504,153 Bridgestone Arena Nashville, TN 56 190,192 Qantas Credit Union Arena Darling Harbour, AUSTRALIA 7 483,820 Ziggo Dome Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS 57 189,131 Chesapeake Energy Arena Oklahoma City, OK 8 468,622 Lanxess Arena Cologne, GERMANY 58 187,699 Vector Arena Auckland, NEW ZEALAND 9 431,754 Staples Center Los Angeles, CA 59 185,561 United Center Chicago, IL 10 423,709 Forum Inglewood, CA 60 178,302 Tempodrom Berlin, GERMANY 11 418,436 Allstate Arena Rosemont, IL 61 177,989 Brisbane Entertainment Centre Brisbane, AUSTRALIA 12 417,431 Barclays Center Brooklyn, NY 62 177,979 Antwerps Sportpaleis Merksem, BELGIUM 13 405,448 American Airlines Center Dallas, TX 63 177,976 Ticketpro Dome Johannesburg, SOUTH AFRICA 14 404,094 Bell Centre Montreal, CANADA 64 175,255 TD Garden Boston, MA 15 365,693 Sprint Center Kansas City, MO 65 165,758 Ericsson Globe Stockholm, SWEDEN 16 363,383 Arena Monterrey Monterrey, MEXICO 66 164,986 Honda Center Anaheim, CA 17 357,636 Philips Arena Atlanta, GA 67 163,406 AmericanAirlines Arena Miami, FL 18
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Evolution of Urban Multipurpose Facilities
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School July 2019 Examining the Evolution of Urban Multipurpose Facilities: Applying the Ideal-Type to the Facilities of the National Hockey League and National Basketball Association Benjamin Downs Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Other Kinesiology Commons, and the Sports Studies Commons Recommended Citation Downs, Benjamin, "Examining the Evolution of Urban Multipurpose Facilities: Applying the Ideal-Type to the Facilities of the National Hockey League and National Basketball Association" (2019). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 4989. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/4989 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. EXAMINING THE EVOLUTION OF URBAN MULTIPURPOSE FACILITIES: APPLYING THE IDEAL-TYPE TO THE FACILITIES OF THE NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE AND NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Kinesiology by Benjamin Downs B.A., The College of Wooster, 2008 M.S., Mississippi State University, 2016 August 2019 This dissertation is dedicated to my daughter Stella Corinne. Thank you for being my source of inspiration and provider of levity throughout this process. I love you Birdie. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my doctoral advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]