DOCSLIB.ORG

DC2RVA Tier II Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DC2RVA Tier II Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(F 12 REFERENCES D.C. TO RICHMOND SOUTHEAST HIGH SPEED RAIL 7 REFERENCES 12 Amtrak. 1999. Report to Congress: Potential Improvements to the Washington-Richmond Railroad Corridor, Vol. 1. Washington, D.C. May 1999. 87 pages. 2008. Advancing Passenger Rail in the Commonwealth of Virginia: Short Term Action Plan, Part I. Washington, D.C. 28 pages. January 2008. 2008. Amtrak Fact Sheet, Fiscal Year 2007: Commonwealth of Virginia. Washington, D.C. 2 pages. 2010. PRIIA Section 210 FY10 Performance Improvement Plan: Cardinal. Washington, D.C. 34 pages. 2010 Fact Sheet: New Passenger Rail Service Comes to Richmond and Eastern Virginia. Washington, D.C. and Richmond, VA. 2 pages. 2011. PRIIA Section 210 FY11 Performance Improvement Plan: Crescent, Lake Shore Limited, Silver Service. Washington, D.C. 90 pages. 2011. Amtrak Fact Sheet, Fiscal Year 2011: Commonwealth of Virginia. Washington, D.C. 3 pages. 2012. PRIIA Section 210 FY11 Performance Improvement Plan: Auto Train, City of New Orleans, Coast Starlight, Empire Builder, Southwest Chief. Washington, D.C. 84 pages. 2012. Amtrak Fact Sheet, Fiscal Year 2012: Commonwealth of Virginia. Washington, D.C. 4 pages. 2012. The Amtrak Vision for the Northeast Corridor: 2012 Update Report. July 2012. Washington, D.C. and Richmond, VA. 2 pages. 2012. Northeast Corridor Employee Timetable No. 5. October 5, 2012. 2013. Station Program Planning Guidelines. https://spportal.my-techub.com/Sites/DC2RVA/ Project%20Communication/Reference%20Material/amtrak-station-planning-and- program-guidelines.pdf. 2013. 12-1 TIER II DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 2013. Amtrak Fact Sheet, Fiscal Year 2013: Commonwealth of Virginia. Washington, D.C. 5 pages. 2014. Amtrak Fact Sheet, Fiscal Year 2014: Commonwealth of Virginia. Washington, D.C. 4 pages. 2014. Strategic Plan FY2014-FY2018. Washington, D.C. 40 pages. 2015. Amtrak System Timetable Spring-Fall 2015: Effective April 6, 2015. Washington, D.C. 141 pages. April 6, 2015. 2015. Amtrak System Timetable: Virginia Service Connecting the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic. Washington, D.C. 5 pages. April 6, 2015. Arlington County. 2007. Master Transportation Plan: Goals and Policies Summary. Arlington, VA. 2011. Five-Year Review of Arlington County’s Comprehensive Plan: 2005-2010. Arlington, VA. 2017. Summary Report on Amendments to Arlington County’s Comprehensive Plan: A Five- Year Review July 1, 2010 - June 30, 2015 (with updates from July 1, 2015 - June 30, 2016). Arlington, VA. Association of American Railroads. 2012. Freight Railroads in Virginia–Rail Fast Facts for 2012. Washington, D.C. 2 pages. 2015. The Environmental Benefits of Moving Freight by Rail. August 2015. Beadles, Richard L. 2010. Prepared Comments of Dick Beadles for Southeast High Speed Rail Public Hearing, Richmond, VA. July 20, 2010. 6 pages. 2013. Railroad Policy in Virginia: How We Got Where We Are and Where We Might Go from Here. The Virginia News Letter, Vol. 89, No. 3. June 2013. University of Virginia Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service. 21 pages. Bird Nature. 2015. Spring and Fall Migration Timetable. http://www.birdnature.com/timetable.html. Accessed March 25, 2015. Bradley, M.J. and Associates. 2014. Updated Comparison of Energy Use and Emissions from Different Transportation Modes. Manchester, NH. Buckingham Branch Railroad (BBR). 2011. Richmond & Alleghany Division Timetable No. 1. January 24, 2011. 12-2 REFERENCES Caroline County. 2010. Caroline County Comprehensive Plan 2030. Bowling Green, VA. Chesapeake Bay Program. 1995. Guidance for Protecting Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in Chesapeake Bay from Physical Disruption. Prepared by: Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Workgroup of the Living Resources Subcommittee, Chesapeake Bay Program. EPA 903-R-95-013 CBP/TRS139/95. Printed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for the Chesapeake Bay Program. August 1995. Chesterfield County. 2012. Moving Forward: The Comprehensive Plan for Chesterfield County. Chesterfield, VA. Code of Virginia. Nd. Virginia Antiquities Act (Code of Virginia § 10.1-2300). Nd. Crossing of a railroad or public highway by another railroad; crossing of a railroad by a public highway. https://vacode.org/56-363/. Comstock, Jeffrey A., Sandra H. Azevedo, M. Frances Faure, and Suzanne M. Pierson. 2003. Level III and IV Ecoregions of EPA Region 3 Map. United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/wed/pages/ecoregions/reg3_eco.htm. May 28, 2003. CCB (The Center for Conservation Biology). 2016. Mapping Portal-VaEagles Nest Locater. http://www.ccbbirds.org/maps/#eagles. Last updated 2016. Accessed May 2016. City of Fredericksburg, VA. 2007. Fredericksburg Comprehensive Plan. Fredericksburg, VA. 2010. Historic Preservation Plan for the City of Fredericksburg, Virginia. Prepared in conjunction with the City of Fredericksburg Comprehensive Plan by Historic Preservation Task Force, Planning Commission, and City Staff. City of Fredericksburg, VA. June 2010. 2014. Draft Comprehensive Plan. Fredericksburg, VA. City of Alexandria, VA. 2008. City of Alexandria Comprehensive Transportation Master Plan. Alexandria, VA. City of Richmond, VA. 2000. Master Plan, Richmond. Richmond, VA. 12-3 TIER II DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 2001. Wetlands digitized by the City of Richmond. GIS format. Received March 20, 2011. 2006. Richmond Main Street Statin: Track and Platform Modifications–Concept Design Study. September 2006. 66 pages. 2009. Richmond Downtown Plan. Richmond Planning Commission and Richmond Community Development Department. July 2009. http://www.ci.richmond.va.us/planninganddevelopmentreview/PlansOther.aspx#Do wntown City of Richmond Department of Economic and Community Development. 2016. Main Street Station Phase 3 Development. City of Richmond Department of Economic & Community Development Website. http://www.yesrichmondva.com/transportation- development/Main-Street-Station-Phase-3-Development. Accessed September 27, 2016. Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). 1997. Considering Cumulative Effects under the National Environmental Policy Act. Washington, D.C. 1997. 2016. Final Guidance for Federal Departments and Agencies on Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Effects of Climate Change in National Environmental Policy Act Reviews. Washington, D.C. 2016 Cowardin, Lewis M., Virginia Carter, Francis C. Golet, and Edward T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Biological Services, Washington, D.C. Jamestown, ND: Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Online. http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/ wetlands/classwet/index.htm (Version 04DEC1998). CSX Corporation. 2007. United States Department of Transportation Corridors of the Future Program Application: The Southeast I-95 Corridor. May 25, 2007. Jacksonville, FL. 72 pages. CSX Transportation (CSXT). 2009. The Peninsula Subdivision. Prepared for The Hampton Roads Partnership. July 17, 2009. 18 PowerPoint slides. 2010. Track chart: Baltimore Division–RF&P Subdivision. May 24, 2010. 25 pages. 2010. Track chart: C&O Division–Piedmont Subdivision and Peninsula Subdivision. May 24, 2010. 59 pages. 2010. Track chart: Florence Division–Bellwood/Richmond Terminal Subdivision. May 24, 2010. 1 page. 12-4 REFERENCES 2010. Track chart: Florence Division–North End/Richmond Terminal Subdivision. May 24, 2010. 1 page. 2010. Track chart: Florence Division–North End Subdivision. May 24, 2010. 25 pages. 2011. System Clearance map: 286,000 GWR. Jacksonville, FL. September 23, 2011. 1 page. 2012. Florence Division Timetable No. 7.1. May 1, 2012. 2012. Huntington Division East Timetable No. 3. August 5, 2012. 2012. System Clearance map: Multilevel Routes. Jacksonville, FL. December 6, 2012. 1 page. 2013. System Clearance map: Multilevel Routes. Jacksonville, FL. December 3, 2013. 1 page. 2014. CSX in Virginia fact sheet. Jacksonville, FL. May 15, 2014. 2 pages. 2015. Class 1 Railroad Annual Report to the Surface Transportation Board for the year ending December 26, 2014. Jacksonville, FL. March 2015. 139 pages. 2015. Baltimore Division Timetable No. 1. April 1, 2015. 2015. System Clearance map: Auto Rack. Jacksonville, FL. May 2015. 1 page. 2015. System Clearance map: Double Stack. Jacksonville, FL. May 2015. 1 page. 2015. System Clearance map: Tonnage. Jacksonville, FL. May 2015. 1 page. CSX Transportation and Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transit. 2000. Capacity Study of Richmond, VA, Washington, D.C. Rail Corridor. Springfield, VA. November 2000. 63 pages. District Department of Transportation. 2014. Virginia Avenue Tunnel Reconstruction: Final Environmental Impact Statement & Section 4(f) Evaluation. Executive Summary. Washington, D.C. May 2014. 44 pages. 2015. Long Bridge Study. Washington, D.C. January 2015. Dollins, Heather 2014. Yellow Tavern Battlefield. Virginia-Cultural Resource Information System Form. Completed as part of the Lakeside Bridge Study, Henrico County, Virginia. Copy on file, Virginia Department of Historic Resources, Richmond, Virginia. Environmental Risk Information Service (ERIS). 2016. Database Report–Ashland Bypass, Ashland, VA. Order #: 20160219034. Requested by: Parsons (Parsons Transportation Group). February 24, 2016. 12-5 TIER II DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 2016. Database Report–Fredericksburg Bypass, Fredericksburg, VA. Order #: 20160211138. Requested by: Parsons (Parsons Transportation Group). February 24, 2016. 2014. Database Report–Virginia Existing Rail Project–Part 1. Richmond,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Virginia Railway Express Strategic Plan 2004-2025
    VRE STRATEGIC PLAN Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................V Current State of the Railroad ..............................................................................................................v The Strategic Planning Process..........................................................................................................vi The VRE Ridership Market................................................................................................................vii Strategic Plan Scenarios and Recommendations .............................................................................viii Core Network Needs...........................................................................................................................ix Potential Network Expansion ..............................................................................................................x Phased Service Improvement and Capital Investment Plan ..............................................................xii Financial, Institutional and Organizational Issues ..........................................................................xiii VRE Moving Forward ......................................................................................................................xiv 1. CURRENT STATE OF THE RAILROAD..........................................................................................1 VRE SYSTEM OVERVIEW .........................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Headquarters Assigned Accident Investigation Report HQ-2006-24 CSX Transportati
    Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Headquarters Assigned Accident Investigation Report HQ-2006-24 CSX Transportation (CSX) Richmond, Virginia April 22, 2006 Note that 49 U.S.C. §20903 provides that no part of an accident or incident report made by the Secretary of Transportation/Federal Railroad Administration under 49 U.S.C. §20902 may be used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT FRA File # HQ-2006-24 FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION 1.Name of Railroad Operating Train #1 1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. CSX Transportation [CSX ] CSX R000022015 2.Name of Railroad Operating Train #2 2a. Alphabetic Code 2b. Railroad Accident/Incident N/A N/A N/A 3.Name of Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance: 3a. Alphabetic Code 3b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. CSX Transportation [CSX ] CSX N/A 4. U.S. DOT_AAR Grade Crossing Identification Number 5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident Month Day Year 04 22 2006 05:19:00 AM PM 7. Type of Accident/Indicent 1. Derailment 4. Side collision 7. Hwy-rail crossing 10. Explosion-detonation 13. Other (single entry in code box) 2. Head on collision 5. Raking collision 8. RR grade crossing 11. Fire/violent rupture (describe in narrative) 3. Rear end collision 6. Broken Train collision 9. Obstruction 12. Other impacts 01 8. Cars Carrying 9. HAZMAT Cars 10. Cars Releasing 11. People 12. Division HAZMAT Damaged/Derailed HAZMAT Evacuated 0 0 0 0 FLORENCE 13. Nearest City/Town 14.
    [Show full text]
  • December 07 LE&T News
    LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN DECEMBER 2007 PUBLISHED BY THENEWS BLET, A DIVISION OF THE RAIL CONFERENCE, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS Happy Holidays! Thousands turn out for annual CSX Santa Special Thousands of children and families train left Erwin, Tenn., on November 16 turned out on November 17 for the 65th and traveled to Kingsport, Tenn., where annual CSX Santa Claus Special. The the toys and food for the needy were annual train follows a 110-mile stretch loaded on the train. They then traveled in the rural mountain communities of to Shelby, Ky., for the night, and on No- Eastern Kentucky, western Virginia vember 17, the Santa Train began its and Northeast Tennessee, and is one run from Shelby, Ky. to Kingsport, Tenn. of Appalacia’s most anticipated holiday Country singer Patty Loveless was traditions. the special guest on the train this year. Santa himself rode in the caboose Brother Peoples said that including and was part of the team that distrib- Shelby, one of the 14 stops along the uted more than 15 tons of toys at 14 route caters to children with special stops along the route. needs. Another major player on the team As important as the locomotive en- was locomotive engineer Alf Peoples, a gineer is on the Santa Train, a team of CSX engineer and member of Division volunteers make sure everyone stays 781 in Erwin, Tenn. Brother Peoples safe along the route. worked as locomotive engineer of the “There are many BLET and UTU Santa Claus Special this year. members all along the 110 mile route Brother Peoples is a veteran Santa to keep the crowds out of the track as Train engineer, and involvement with the train arrives,” he said.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 MS4 Annual Report
    2016 ANNUAL REPORT: A SUMMARY OF MS4 PERMIT YEAR 2 PROGRESS Chesterfield County, Virginia VSMP Permit No. VA0088609 Prepared March 2017 Department of Environmental Engineering 9800 Government Center Parkway P.O. Box 40 Chesterfield, VA 23832 Chesterfield County, Virginia Permit No. VA0088609 2016 Annual Report Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................... I List of Tables............................................................................................................................................................... ii List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................................. iii List of Appendices....................................................................................................................................................... v SECTION 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................................................. 1 a) The Permittee and Permit Number ..................................................................................................................... 1 b) Modifications to the MS4 Program Plan ............................................................................................................. 1 c) Reporting Dates .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Commerce Corridor Study Technical Report
    Adopted Oct 5 2017 Commerce Corridor Study Technical Report Commerce Corridor Study RICHMOND REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION The Richmond Regional Transportation Planning Organization (RRTPO) is the federal and state designated metropolitan planning organization that serves as the forum for cooperative transportation decision-making in the Richmond region. The Richmond Regional Planning District Commission (RRPDC) is the contracting agent and staff for the RRTPO. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Commerce Corridor Study was prepared by Michael Baker International in cooperation with CDM Smith and the Economic Development Research Group (EDRG) on behalf of the Virginia Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment of the Secretary of Transportation and the Richmond Regional Transportation Planning Organization. The report was prepared in consultation with RRTPO staff and representatives of the City of Richmond, Chesterfield County, Henrico County, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT), and the Port of Virginia (POV). DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the analysis and findings of Michael Baker International and their consultant team. The RRTPO accepts the accuracy of this work in recognition that the contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), VDOT or DRPT. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. The Commerce Corridor Study is the result of a vision and scenario planning exercise to identify future transportation needs and solutions for a sub-regional study area. The Commerce Corridor Study is complementary to the region’s adopted metropolitan transportation plan, plan2040. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Bridge Project Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Alternatives Development Report
    Long Bridge Project Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Alternatives Development Report June 19, 2018 Long Bridge Project EIS Draft Alternatives Development Report Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. NEPA Requirements for Alternatives Development ..................................................................... 1 1.2. Purpose of this Report .................................................................................................................. 1 1.3. Project Background ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.4. Concept Screening Process ........................................................................................................... 4 1.5. Organization of this Report .......................................................................................................... 4 2.0 Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Why is the Project needed? .......................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Will the Long Bridge consider bicycle and pedestrian access? .................................................... 8 3.0 Alternatives Development Process ................................................................................ 9 3.1. Pre-NEPA Alternatives Development
    [Show full text]
  • SWAMP PINK Scientific Name: Helonias Bullata Linnaeus Other
    Common Name: SWAMP PINK Scientific Name: Helonias bullata Linnaeus Other Commonly Used Names: none Previously Used Scientific Names: none Family: Heloniadaceae (swamp pink), Melanthiaceae (bunchflower), or Liliaceae (lily) Rarity Ranks: G3/S1 State Legal Status: Threatened Federal Legal Status: Threatened Federal Wetland Status: OBL Description: Perennial herb often forming dense patches of large basal rosettes connected by underground stems. Leaves 3½ - 12 inches (9 - 30 cm) long and up to 1½ inches (4 cm) wide, glossy, evergreen, widest above the middle with pointed tips and tapering bases. Stem 1 - 2 feet (30 - 60 cm) tall while flowering, taller during fruiting, rising from the center of each rosette, stout, hollow. Flowers about inch (1 cm) wide, with 6 pink tepals (3 sepals + 3 petals) and six blue stamens, in a dense spike of 30 - 50 fragrant flowers at the top of the stem. Fruit inch long, 3-lobed, heart-shaped, papery, with many winged seeds. Similar Species: In flower, swamp pink is unmistakable. Fly poison (Amianthium muscitoxicum), which produces basal rosettes in the same habitats as swamp-pink, has white flowers and stiff, dull green leaves less than 1 inch (2.8 cm) wide, with conspicuous veins. Related Rare Species: None in Georgia. Habitat: Shady seepage swamps and sphagnum bogs with continually saturated, though not flooded, soils; often occurs with red maple, purple pitcherplant, mountain laurel, rosebay rhododendron, and tag alder. Life History: Swamp pink is a perennial herb that overwinters as a rosette of reddish-brown leaves. New leaves appear in the early spring, shortly before the flowering stalk elongates, and continue to enlarge during the spring and summer.
    [Show full text]
  • CSX Huntington East Timetable
    HUNTINGTON EAST DIVISION DRAFT EFFECTIVE SATURDAY, JANUARY 1, 2005 AT 0001 HOURS CSX STANDARD TIME G.M. Williams, III General Manager HUNTINGTON DIVISION EAST TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL INFORMATION SUBDIVISION PAGE NAME CODE DISP PAGE Table of Contents i Timetable Legend ii Alleghany AG AM Sample Subdivision iii Big Coal BX BJ Telephone Numbers iv Big Marsh Fork BM BJ Emergency Assistance v Bridgeport PU CJ Train Dispatchers vi Buffalo BF BJ Cabin Creek C0 BJ Cincinnati ZE CR SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS Coal River CR BJ Columbus CS CR INST DESCRIPTION Columbus Line QE IF 1 Instructions Relating to Operating Rules Cowen CJ CI Fairmont FT CI 2 Instructions Relating to Safety Rules G&E GE BJ 3 Instructions Relating to Company Policies and Gauley GU BJ Practices Georges Creek GK CI Instructions Relating to Equipment Handling Island Creek IC BJ 4 Rules James River JR AL Instructions relating to Air Brake and Train Jarrolds Valley JV BJ 5 Handling Rules Kanawha KW AN Laurel Fork LU BJ 6 Instructions relating to Equipment Restrictions Logan LG BJ 7 Instructions Relating to Miscellaneous Items Logan and Southern LS BJ Marietta MV CJ Mountain MT CI New River NR AM Northern NO CR Ohio River OR CJ Peninsula PS AL Pickens PK CI Pine Creek P7 BJ Piney Creek PC BJ Pomeroy PV CJ Pond Fork PF BJ Raleigh Southwestern & Winding Gulf RZ BJ Rivanna RV AL Rupert RT BJ Russell RS CR Scottslawn Secondary QT IE Seth S5 BJ Sewell Valley SY BJ Short Line SO CJ Stony River SR CI Thomas TM CI West Fork WF BJ CSX Transportation Effective January 1, 2005 Huntington Division East Timetable No.
    [Show full text]
  • CSX Baltimore Division Timetable
    NORTHERN REGION BALTIMORE DIVISION TIMETABLE NO. 4 EFFECTIVE SATURDAY, JANUARY 1, 2005 AT 0001 HOURS CSX STANDARD TIME C. M. Sanborn Division Manager BALTIMORE DIVISION TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL INFORMATION SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DESCRIPTION PAGE INST DESCRIPTION PAGE 1 Instructions Relating to CSX Operating Table of Contents Rules Timetable Legend 2 Instructions Relating to Safety Rules Legend – Sample Subdivision 3 Instructions Relating to Company Policies Region and Division Officers And Procedures Emergency Telephone Numbers 4 Instructions Relating to Equipment Train Dispatchers Handling Rules 5 Instructions Relating to Air Brake and Train SUBDIVISIONS Handling Rules 6 Instructions Relating to Equipment NAME CODE DISP PAGE Restrictions Baltimore Terminal BZ AV 7 Miscellaneous Bergen BG NJ Capital WS AU Cumberland CU CM Cumberland Terminal C3 CM Hanover HV AV Harrisburg HR NI Herbert HB NI Keystone MH CM Landover L0 NI Lurgan LR AV Metropolitan ME AU Mon M4 AS Old Main Line OM AU P&W PW AS Philadelphia PA AV Pittsburgh PI AS.AT Popes Creek P0 NI RF&P RR CQ S&C SC CN Shenandoah SJ CN Trenton TN NI W&P WP AT CSX Transportation Effective January 1, 2005 Albany Division Timetable No. 5 © Copyright 2005 TIMETABLE LEGEND GENERAL F. AUTH FOR MOVE (AUTHORITY FOR MOVEMENT) Unless otherwise indicated on subdivision pages, the The authority for movement rules applicable to the track segment Train Dispatcher controls all Main Tracks, Sidings, of the subdivision. Interlockings, Controlled Points and Yard Limits. G. NOTES STATION LISTING AND DIAGRAM PAGES Where station page information may need to be further defined, a note will refer to “STATION PAGE NOTES” 1– HEADING listed at the end of the diagram.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity in Fruit and Seed Characters of Chamaelirium and Chionographis (Melanthiaceae)
    Taiwania 62(1): 67‒74, 2017 DOI: 10.6165/tai.2017.62.67 Diversity in fruit and seed characters of Chamaelirium and Chionographis (Melanthiaceae) Noriyuki TANAKA 98-11 Otsuka, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0352 Japan. Email: [email protected] (Manuscript received 22 August 2016; accepted 26 January 2017; online published 22 February 2017) ABSTRACT: Phenotypic characters of fruits and seeds of two closely allied genera Chamaelirium and Chionographis (Melanthiaceae) are reexamined. The results show that the two genera differ mainly in the number of ovules per locule, the shape of seeds, and the arrangement of seeds within the locule and of a seed body within the testa. Evidence also shows that in Chionographis a Chinese species (C. chinensis) significantly differ from three species from Japan and Korea (e.g. C. japonica) chiefly by the seeds acutely beaked proximally and in the narrowly obovoid, proximally cuneate fruits (capsules) that ripen in May to June (vs. autumn) and have a carpo-gynophore and locules mutually free, acute, and indehiscent in the proximal part. Data obtained is discussed from taxonomical and evolutionary aspects. KEY WORDS: Carpo-gynophore, Chamaelirium, Chionographis, Fruits, Diversity, Evolution, Melanthiaceae, Seeds, Taxonomy. INTRODUCTION length, and accordingly, they are taxonomically inseparable in this respect. Chionographis Maxim. (Melanthiaceae) is a genus of As for their fruits and seeds, the two genera approximately eight species distributed in Vietnam, Laos, reportedly differ in the number of ovules per locule and China, Japan and Korea (Tanaka, 2016a, b; Wu, 2016). It in the shape of seeds, as aforementioned. Previous is regarded as most closely allied to a monotypic genus reports also indicate that the size of capsules and the Chamaelirium Willd.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington, DC to Richmond Third Track Feasibility Study HOUSE
    REPORT OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Washington, DC to Richmond Third Track Feasibility Study TO THE GOVERNOR AND THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF VIRGINIA HOUSE DOCUMENT NO. 78 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND 2006 Third Track Feasibility Study December 2006 WASHINGTON, D.C. TO RICHMOND THIRD TRACK FEASIBILITY STUDY PREFACE This study was requested by the 2006 General Assembly session in HB 5012. In addition to an analysis of the feasibility of constructing a third track, this study responds to the General Assembly’s direction to expand the scope to: (i) Identify needed right-of-way parallel to existing tracks, including right-of-way owned by CSX or by other parties; (ii) Identify major environmental issues; (iii) Develop an implementation plan based on the most optimal options, including the schedules for each phase of the project as well as financing for the project; (iv) Review legal and regulatory issues; and (v) Estimate the cost of powering passenger trains by electricity for a Third Track from Washington, D.C. to Richmond. The Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) is charged with ensuring that the Commonwealth of Virginia achieves the highest public benefit for the dollars invested in our rail programs. There is no doubt that this is a high priority freight and passenger rail corridor that will require significant investment in order to maintain and improve mobility for people and goods. DRPT is taking a strategic approach in studying this high priority corridor. Our new approach is based on establishing public benefits, identifying public/private partnership opportunities, and providing realistic cost estimates based on a comprehensive plan that identifies all of the improvements and issues that need to be addressed in the provision of reliable, sustainable, expandable, and efficient freight and passenger rail operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Control Point Virginia Tower
    GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC LANDMARK OR HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGNATION New Designation __X___ Amendment of a previous designation _____ Please summarize any amendment(s) _______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ Property name _Control Point (CP) Virginia Tower_______________________________________ If any part of the interior is being nominated, it must be specifically identified and described in the narrative statements. Address __Southeast Corner of 2nd Street SW and Virginia Avenue SW, Washington, DC_________ Square and lot number(s) __0582 0856_________________________________________________ Affected Advisory Neighborhood Commission ______ANC 6D_____________________________ Date of construction __1904-1906____ Date of major alteration(s) __1930s___________________ Architect(s) __Unknown______________ Architectural style(s) ____________________________ Original use _Railroad Interlocking Control Tower_ Present use ___Railroad Infrastructure Property owner _CSX Transportation, Inc._____________________________________________ Legal address of property owner _500 Water Street, Jacksonville, Florida 32202 ________________ NAME OF APPLICANT(S) _CSX Transportation, Inc.____________________________________ If the applicant is an organization, it must submit evidence that among its purposes is the promotion of historic preservation in the District of Columbia.
    [Show full text]