Adult Depression Clinical Practice Guidelines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Adult Depression Clinical Practice Guidelines NATIONAL CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE Adult Depression Clinical Practice Guideline This guideline is informational only. It is not intended or designed as a substitute for the reasonable exercise of independent clinical judgment by practitioners, considering each patient’s needs on an individual basis. Guideline recommendations apply to populations of patients. Clinical judgment is necessary to design treatment plans for individual patients. Approved by the National Guideline Directors February 2012 Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................................................... 1 Guideline Summary...................................................................................................................... 5 Rationale Statements .................................................................................................................. 12 1. First-Line Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) .............................................. 12 2. Hypericum (St. John’s Wort) for MDD............................................................................... 38 3. Antidepressants In Patients With MDD Expressing Suicidal Ideation, Intent, Or Plan...... 44 4. Second-Line Treatment Of MDD ........................................................................................ 48 5. Length Of Treatment With Antidepressants In Patients With MDD................................... 63 6. Follow-Up For Patients In The Acute Phase of Treatment For MDD................................. 70 7. Follow-Up For Patients In The Continuation Phase of Treatment of MDD........................ 72 8. Follow-Up For Patients In Maintenance Phase of Treatment of MDD............................... 74 9. Discontinuation of Antidepressants in Patients with MDD................................................. 75 10. Treatment Preferences For MDD In Different Ethnic Groups ............................................ 77 11. Patient Self-Management Strategies for Improving Symptoms of MDD............................ 80 12. Behavioral Health Education Classes For Adults With MDD............................................. 95 13. Antidepressants To Avoid During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding.......................................... 98 Appendix A: Criteria for Grading the Evidence ................................................................... 108 Appendix B: Supporting Documentation ............................................................................... 110 1. First-Line Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) ............................................ 110 Problem Formulation 1 ......................................................................................................... 110 Search Strategy ..................................................................................................................... 111 Evidence Tables.................................................................................................................... 114 2. Hypericum (St. John’s Wort) For Treatment of MDD ...................................................... 196 Problem Formulation 2 ......................................................................................................... 196 Search Strategy ..................................................................................................................... 197 Evidence Tables.................................................................................................................... 200 3. Antidepressants In Patients With MDD Expressing Suicidal Ideation, Intent, or Plan..... 207 Problem Formulation 3 ......................................................................................................... 207 Search Strategy ..................................................................................................................... 208 Evidence Tables.................................................................................................................... 210 4. Second-Line Treatement of MDD ..................................................................................... 214 Problem Formulation 4 ......................................................................................................... 214 Search Strategy ..................................................................................................................... 215 Evidence Tables.................................................................................................................... 218 © 2012 Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program For use within Kaiser Permanente only. 02/12 i National Adult Depression Clincial Practice Guideline 5. Length of Treatment With Antidepressants In Patients With MDD.................................. 228 Problem Formulation 5 ......................................................................................................... 228 Search Strategy ..................................................................................................................... 229 Evidence Tables.................................................................................................................... 232 6. Follow-Up For Patients In The Acute Phase of Treatment For MDD............................... 239 Problem Formulation 6 ......................................................................................................... 239 Search Strategy ..................................................................................................................... 240 Evidence Table...................................................................................................................... 242 7. Follow-Up For Patients In The Continuation Phase of Treatment For MDD ................... 243 Problem Formulation 7 ......................................................................................................... 243 Search Strategy ..................................................................................................................... 244 Evidence Table...................................................................................................................... 246 8. Follow-Up For Patients In Maintenance Phase Treatment Of MDD ................................ 247 Problem Formulation 8 ......................................................................................................... 247 Search Strategy ..................................................................................................................... 248 Evidence Table...................................................................................................................... 249 9. Discontinuation of Antidepressants In Patients With MDD.............................................. 250 Problem Formulation 9 ......................................................................................................... 250 Search Strategy ..................................................................................................................... 251 Evidence Tables.................................................................................................................... 253 10. Treatment Preferences For MDD In Different Ethnic Groups .......................................... 255 Problem Formulation 10 ....................................................................................................... 255 Search Strategy ..................................................................................................................... 256 Evidence Table...................................................................................................................... 258 11. Patient Self-Management Strategies For Improving Symptoms of MDD......................... 259 Problem Formulation 11 ....................................................................................................... 259 Search Strategy ..................................................................................................................... 260 Evidence Tables.................................................................................................................... 262 12. Behavioral Health Education Classes For Adults With MDD........................................... 276 Problem Formulation 12 ....................................................................................................... 276 Search Strategy ..................................................................................................................... 277 Evidence Tables.................................................................................................................... 279 13. Antidepressants To Avoid During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding........................................ 283 Problem Formulation 13 ....................................................................................................... 283 Search Strategy ..................................................................................................................... 284 Evidence Tables.................................................................................................................... 285 References.................................................................................................................................. 298 © 2012 Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program For use within Kaiser Permanente only. 02/12
Recommended publications
  • Prozac and Prozac Weekly (Fluoxetine Hcl)
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH Approval Package for: APPLICATION NUMBER: NDA 18-936/S-093 NDA 21-235/S-016 Trade Name: Prozac and Prozac Weekly Generic Name: fluoxetine HCl Sponsor: Lilly Approval Date: April 4, 2011 ,QGLFDWLRQ Revisions to the following section 8.1 of the label. CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: NDA 18-936/S-093 NDA 21-235/S-016 CONTENTS Reviews / Information Included in this NDA Review. Approval Letter X Other Action Letters X Labeling Summary Review X Officer/Employee List Office Director Memo Cross Discipline Team Leader Review Medical Review(s) X Chemistry Review(s) Pharmacology Review(s) Statistical Review(s) Clinical Pharmacology/Biopharmaceutics Review(s) Other Reviews X Proprietary Name Review(s) Administrative/Correspondence Document(s) X CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: NDA 18-936/S-093 NDA 21-235/S-016 APPROVAL LETTER DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring MD 20993 NDA 018936/S-091/S-093/S-095 NDA 021235/S-015/S-016/S-017 SUPPLEMENT APPROVAL Eli Lilly & Company Attention: Kevin C. Sheehan, MS, Pharm.D. Manager, Global Regulatory Affairs - US Lilly Corporate Center Indianapolis, IN 46285 Dear Dr. Sheehan: Please refer to your Supplemental New Drug Applications (sNDA) dated and received May 21, 2009 (018936/S-091 and 021235/S-015), November 6, 2009 (018936/S-093 and 021235/S-016), and April 14, 2010 (018936/S-095 and 021235/S-017), submitted under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) for Prozac (fluoxetine hydrochloride) 10 mg, 20 mg, and 40 mg capsules and Prozac Weekly (fluoxetine hydrochloride) 90 mg delayed-release capsules.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Major Depressive Disorder Clinical Practice Guidelines May 2014
    Federal Bureau of Prisons Management of Major Depressive Disorder Clinical Practice Guidelines May 2014 Table of Contents 1. Purpose ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Natural History ................................................................................................................................. 2 Special Considerations ...................................................................................................................... 2 3. Screening ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Screening Questions .......................................................................................................................... 3 Further Screening Methods................................................................................................................ 4 4. Diagnosis ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Depression: Three Levels of Severity ............................................................................................... 4 Clinical Interview and Documentation of Risk Assessment...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Q 2: How Long Should Treatment with Antidepressants Continue in Adults with Depressive Episode/Disorder?
    Duration of antidepressant treatment Q 2: How long should treatment with antidepressants continue in adults with depressive episode/disorder? Background Short-term therapy with antidepressant medication is considered standard treatment for acute treatment of moderate to severe depressive episode/disorder. However, because of the long-term nature of depressive disorders, with many patients at substantial risk of later recurrence, there is a need to establish how long, in general, such patients should stay on antidepressants if they have responded to the treatment. Population/Intervention(s)/Comparison/Outcome(s) (PICO) Population: individuals with depressive episode/disorder Interventions: antidepressant medications: tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) and related, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) Comparison: placebo Outcomes: o treatment effectiveness in terms of reduction symptoms o treatment effectiveness in terms of improvement in functioning o acceptability profile List of the systematic reviews identified by the search process INCLUDED IN GRADE TABLES OR FOOTNOTES Deshauer D et al (2008). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for unipolar depression: a systematic review of classic long-term randomized controlled trials. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 178:293-1301. 1 Duration of antidepressant treatment Geddes JR et al (2003). Relapse prevention with antidepressant drug treatment in depressive disorders: a systematic review. Lancet, 361:653-61. Hansen R et al (2008). Meta-analysis of major depressive disorder relapse and recurrence with second-generation antidepressants. Psychiatric Services, 59:1121-30. Kaymaz N et al (2008). Evidence that patients with single versus recurrent depressive episodes are differentially sensitive to treatment discontinuation: a meta- analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 69:1423-36.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Repurposing for the Management of Depression: Where Do We Stand Currently?
    life Review Drug Repurposing for the Management of Depression: Where Do We Stand Currently? Hosna Mohammad Sadeghi 1,†, Ida Adeli 1,† , Taraneh Mousavi 1,2, Marzieh Daniali 1,2, Shekoufeh Nikfar 3,4,5 and Mohammad Abdollahi 1,2,* 1 Toxicology and Diseases Group (TDG), Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center (PSRC), The Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (TIPS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran; [email protected] (H.M.S.); [email protected] (I.A.); [email protected] (T.M.); [email protected] (M.D.) 2 Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran 3 Personalized Medicine Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran; [email protected] 4 Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center (PSRC) and the Pharmaceutical Management and Economics Research Center (PMERC), Evidence-Based Evaluation of Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Group, The Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (TIPS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran 5 Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, School of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran * Correspondence: [email protected] † Equally contributed as first authors. Citation: Mohammad Sadeghi, H.; Abstract: A slow rate of new drug discovery and higher costs of new drug development attracted Adeli, I.; Mousavi, T.; Daniali, M.; the attention of scientists and physicians for the repurposing and repositioning of old medications. Nikfar, S.; Abdollahi, M. Drug Experimental studies and off-label use of drugs have helped drive data for further studies of ap- Repurposing for the Management of proving these medications.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment Considerations for Depression in Patients with Significant Medical Comorbidity
    Treatment Considerations for Depression in Patients with Significant Medical Comorbidity David M. McCoy, MD Nashville, Tennessee In addition to being a strong psychological stressor in favors the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors itself, medical illness is associated with risk factors that and other new antidepressants because they have fewer predispose patients to develop coexisting depression. anticholinergic, cardiac, or cognitive adverse effects. Patients with conditions such as cancer, cardiovascular Depressed medically ill patients clearly benefit from anti­ disease, and neurologic disorders are particularly prone depressant therapy. Because mental health influences to depression because these illnesses are severe, prognosis and treatment outcome, primary care physi­ chronic, and often fatal. Because an antidepressant may cians should maintain a high index of suspicion for exacerbate an underlying illness, leading to more seri­ depression in patients with significant medical illness ous side effects, agents with a poor tolerability profile or and aggressively treat the condition when indicated. that act at multiple receptor sites should be avoided. In many cases, this precludes the use of tricyclic antide­ KEY WORDS. Depression; comorbidity; drug therapy. J pressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and Fam Pract 1996; 43(suppl):S35-S44 ajor depression is responsible for and treatment of depression in the family medicine more days in nonpsychiatric hospitals setting. and more days home from work than any other chronic illness except for RISK FACTORS severe, unstable coronary artery dis­ ease.1M Even though at least 8 million people in the Some medical disorders have clearly been associat­ United States become depressed in any given year,2 ed with higher incidences of depression.
    [Show full text]
  • Double-Blind Switch Study of Imipramine Or Sertraline Treatment of Antidepressant-Resistant Chronic Depression
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Double-blind Switch Study of Imipramine or Sertraline Treatment of Antidepressant-Resistant Chronic Depression Michael E. Thase, MD; A. John Rush, MD; Robert H. Howland, MD; Susan G. Kornstein, MD; James H. Kocsis, MD; Alan J. Gelenberg, MD; Alan F. Schatzberg, MD; Lorrin M. Koran, MD; Martin B. Keller, MD; James M. Russell, MD; Robert M. A. Hirschfeld, MD; Lisa M. LaVange, PhD; Daniel N. Klein, PhD; Jan Fawcett, MD; Wilma Harrison, MD Background: Although various strategies have been pro- verse effects. Although sertraline treatment also re- posed to treat antidepressant nonresponders, little con- sulted in significantly higher response rates in the intent- trolled research has been published that examines pro- to-treat samples (60% in the sertraline group and 44% spectively the use of switching to an alternate antidepressant. in the imipramine group), neither the intent-to-treat re- mission rates nor the response and remission rates among Methods: This was a multisite study in which outpa- study completers differed significantly. Moreover, after tients with chronic major depression (with or without considering the effect of attrition, there were no signifi- concurrent dysthymia), who failed to respond to 12 weeks cant treatment effects on the more comprehensive gen- of double-blind treatment with either sertraline hydro- eralized estimating equation analyses of the continuous chloride (n=117) or imipramine hydrochloride (n=51), dependent measures. were crossed over or switched to 12 additional weeks of double-blind treatment with the alternate medication. Conclusions: More than 50% of chronically depressed Outcome measures included the 24-item Hamilton Rat- antidepressant nonresponders benefited from a switch ing Scale for Depression and the Clinical Global Impres- from imipramine to sertraline, or vice versa, despite a high sions–Severity and Improvement scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Affective Disorders and Antidepressant Drugs
    Open Access Library Journal Affective Disorders and Antidepressant Drugs Marc Fakhoury Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada Email: [email protected] Received 4 June 2014; revised 10 July 2014; accepted 18 August 2014 Copyright © 2014 by author and OALib. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Affective disorders are a group of psychiatric diseases that can affect an individual at any given age. Also called mood disorders, they can be distinguished into two different types: major depres- sive disorder, also called major depression, and bipolar disorder, which is known as manic de- pression. People affected by major depression most often have a low mood, and are consistently in a state of unhappiness. Although it was shown that genetics play a role in the predisposition of depression, this disease most often occurs in response to a variety of external factors such as a stressful life event, the loss of a loved one, and following drug or substance abuse. A variety of an- tidepressant drugs, such as the monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), the tricyclic antidepres- sants (TCAs), and the second-generation antidepressants are able to provide significant relief for people suffering from affective disorders like depression. However, several of these pharma- ceutical agents can cause serious side effects to the patients. Therefore, there is a need to identify novel antidepressant therapies that are more efficient and that present minimal side effects. A better understanding of the neurobiology of depression will definitively help scientists develop new therapeutic ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hypericum Extract in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms in Outpatients: an Open Study
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2010 A Hypericum extract in the treatment of depressive symptoms in outpatients: an open study Melzer, J ; Brignoli, R ; Keck, M E ; Saller, R Abstract: Background: Extracts of Hypericum perforatum have demonstrated in randomized trials (RCTs) to be effective in mild to moderate depressive episodes, However, as their use in dailyprac- tice may differ from that in RCTs we have conducted a study to achieve a better estimate oftherange and frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADR) and the efficacy. Patients and Methods: In an obser- vational study in Germany, adult outpatients with depressive syndrome were treated with an extract of St. John’s Wort. Study duration was 12 weeks, with control visits every 4 weeks, Besides anamnestic data, the variables assessed were: evolution of ICD-l0 derived sympscore, Global Clinical Impression scale (GCI), and toleraoility, Results: 1,778 patients from 304 centers participated in the study (mean duration of disorder 7.3 ± 18.9 months), and 1,541 patients completed it. At the last control visit the ICD-l0 sum score had dropped by 63.1 % and the proportion of patients described as ’normal to mildly ill’ (GCI-s) had increased from 21 .6% at admission to 72.4%. Regarding the GCI-i, 77% of the patients had improved ’very much’ or ’much’ at the last visit. This was consistent with their self-assessment (76%). Lower age and shorter duration of the disorder were associated with significantly better outcomes, The incidence of ADRs was 3,54% and had been decreasing continuously fram the first contra I visit onwards; serious ADRs did not occure, Conclusions: The herbai drug was weil tolerated, and no new or serious ADR were identified.
    [Show full text]
  • DBSA Uni Bipolar.V2:DBSA Findadocfinal
    Mood Disorders and Different Kinds of Depression We’ve been there. We can help. n any given year, nearly one in 10 American I adults will suffer from a mood disorder. These ill- nesses involve changes in mood that affect daily life. They include major depres- sive disorder, dysthymia (persistent, low-grade depression) and bipolar disorder (episodes of “low” mood that alternate with episodes of “high” mood or unusual levels of energy or activity). People with mood disorders might have trouble with work life, family life and social life, or they might have difficulty simply get- ting through the day. While most mood disorders have depression in common, only in bipolar disorder are there mood swings of depression and periods of hypo- mania (if the bipolar disorder is mild) or mania (if severe). It’s important to know the difference between the different types of depression, because different types require different treatments. What is Depression? Depression is more than just feeling sad. It’s a seri- ous—but treatable—medical illness characterized by an imbalance of brain chemicals called neurotransmitters and neuropeptides. It’s not a character flaw or a sign of personal weakness. Just like you can’t “wish away” dia- betes, heart disease or any other physical illness, you can’t make depression go away by trying to “snap out of it” or “pull yourself up by your boot straps.” Early in people’s experience of a mood disorder, their episodes of depression often follow stressful events like marital problems or the death of a loved one. While depression sometimes runs in families, many with the illness have no family history of depression.
    [Show full text]
  • (Tricyclic Antidepressants (TCA) and Selective Serotonin Reuptake
    Antidepressants (Tricyclic Antidepressants and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors) in treatment of adults with depression Q 1: Are antidepressants (Tricyclic Antidepressants (TCA) and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI)) better (more effective than/as safe as) than treatment as usual (placebo) in adults with depressive episode/disorder? Background The relative merits of antidepressants versus placebo for depression have been given considerable scientific attention in recent years. This document covers the use of TCAs and SSRIs as acute phase treatment for depressive episode/disorder. Population/Intervention(s)/Comparison/Outcome(s) (PICO) Population: adults with depressive episode/disorder Interventions: antidepressant medicines: TCAs, SSRIs Comparison: placebo Outcomes: o treatment effectiveness in terms of reduction of symptoms o treatment effectiveness in terms of improvement in functioning o acceptability profile o suicide related outcomes List of the systematic reviews identified by the search process INCLUDED IN GRADE TABLES OR FOOTNOTES 1 Antidepressants (Tricyclic Antidepressants and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors) in treatment of adults with depression Arroll B et al (2005). Efficacy and tolerability of tricyclic antidepressants and SSRIs compared with placebo for treatment of depression in primary care: a meta- analysis. Annals of Family Medicine, 3:449-56. Barbui C et al. (2007).Treatment discontinuation with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) versus tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3):CD002791. Furukawa TA, McGuire H, Barbui C (2002). Meta-analysis of effects and side effects of low dosage tricyclic antidepressants in depression: systematic review. British Medical Journal, 325:991. Geddes JR et al (2007). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) versus other antidepressants for depression. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3):CD001851.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of Atypical Depression with Cognitive Therapy Or Phenelzine a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Treatment of Atypical Depression With Cognitive Therapy or Phenelzine A Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Robin B. Jarrett, PhD; Martin Schaffer, MD; Donald McIntire, PhD; Amy Witt-Browder, MA; Dolores Kraft, PhD; Richard C. Risser, MS Background: Patients with atypical depression are more Results: With the use of an intention-to-treat strategy, likely to respond to monoamine oxidase inhibitors than the response rates (21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for De- to tricyclic antidepressants. They are frequently offered pression score, #9) were significantly greater after cog- psychotherapy in the absence of controlled tests. There nitive therapy (58%) and phenelzine (58%) than after pill are no prospective, randomized, controlled trials, to our placebo (28%). Phenelzine and cognitive therapy also re- knowledge, of psychotherapy for atypical depression or duced symptoms significantly more than placebo accord- of cognitive therapy compared with a monoamine oxi- ing to contrasts after a repeated-measures analysis of co- dase inhibitor. Since there is only 1 placebo-controlled variance and random regression with the use of the blind trial of cognitive therapy, this trial fills a gap in the lit- evaluator’s final Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score. erature on psychotherapy for depression. The scores between cognitive therapy and phenelzine did not differ significantly. Supplemental analyses of other Methods: Outpatients with DSM-III-R major depres- symptom severity measures confirm the finding. sive disorder and atypical features (N = 108) were treated in a 10-week, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial Conclusions: Cognitive therapy may offer an effective comparing acute-phase cognitive therapy or clinical man- alternative to standard acute-phase treatment with a agement plus either phenelzine sulfate or placebo.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Relapse After Antidepressant Withdrawal – a Systematic Review
    Psychological Medicine (2017), 47, 426–437. © Cambridge University Press 2016 REVIEW ARTICLE doi:10.1017/S0033291716002580 Predicting relapse after antidepressant withdrawal – a systematic review I. M. Berwian1,2*, H. Walter3, E. Seifritz1 and Q. J. M. Huys1,2 1 Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Zurich, Lenggstrasse 31, 8032 Zürich, Switzerland 2 Translational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Wilfriedstrasse 6, 8032 Zürich, Switzerland 3 Mind and Brain, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany A substantial proportion of the burden of depression arises from its recurrent nature. The risk of relapse after antidepres- sant medication (ADM) discontinuation is high but not uniform. Predictors of individual relapse risk after antidepressant discontinuation could help to guide treatment and mitigate the long-term course of depression. We conducted a system- atic literature search in PubMed to identify relapse predictors using the search terms ‘(depress* OR MDD*) AND (relapse* OR recurren*) AND (predict* OR risk) AND (discontinu* OR withdraw* OR maintenance OR maintain or con- tinu*) AND (antidepress* OR medication OR drug)’ for published studies until November 2014. Studies investigating predictors of relapse in patients aged between 18 and 65 years with a main diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD), who remitted from a depressive episode while treated with ADM and were followed up for at least 6 months to assess relapse after part of the sample discontinued their ADM, were included in the review. Although relevant in- formation is present in many studies, only 13 studies based on nine separate samples investigated predictors for relapse after ADM discontinuation.
    [Show full text]