DOCSLIB.ORG

The Future of Marine Renewables in the UK

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Future of Marine Renewables in the UK House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee The Future of Marine Renewables in the UK Eleventh Report of Session 2010–12 Volume I Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Additional written evidence is contained in Volume II, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/ecc Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 7 February 2012 HC 1624 Published on 19 February 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Energy and Climate Change Committee The Energy and Climate Change Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Tim Yeo MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) (Chair) Dan Byles MP (Conservative, North Warwickshire) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Ian Lavery MP (Labour, Wansbeck) Dr Phillip Lee MP (Conservative, Bracknell) Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Christopher Pincher MP (Conservative, Tamworth) John Robertson MP (Labour, Glasgow North West) Laura Sandys MP (Conservative, South Thanet) Sir Robert Smith MP (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) The following members were also members of the committee during the parliament: Gemma Doyle MP (Labour/Co-operative, West Dunbartonshire) Tom Greatrex MP (Labour, Rutherglen and Hamilton West) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/parliament.uk/ecc. A list of Reports of the Committee in the present Parliament is at the back of this volume. The Report of the Committee, the formal minutes relating to that report, oral evidence taken and some or all written evidence are available in a printed volume. Additional written evidence may be published on the internet only. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Sarah Hartwell-Naguib (Clerk), Dr Richard Benwell (Second Clerk), Dr Michael H. O’Brien (Committee Specialist), Jenny Bird (Committee Specialist), Francene Graham (Senior Committee Assistant), Jonathan Olivier Wright (Committee Assistant), Julie Evans (Committee Support Assistant) and Nick Davies (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Energy and Climate Change Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 2569; the Committee’s email address is [email protected] The Future of Marine Renewables in the UK 1 Contents Report Page Summary 3 1 Introduction 5 Structure of this report 6 2 Potential benefits of wave and tidal power 7 A large domestic resource 7 Energy security 7 Carbon savings 8 Economic benefits 8 3 Attracting investment 10 Types of investor 10 Increasing investor confidence 10 4 Strategy and policy direction 12 Low-carbon technologies 12 Reducing the cost of wave and tidal energy 13 Deployment targets 14 Coordination between strategic funding bodies 15 5 Financing 18 Capital support 18 Revenue support 21 6 Other barriers to the development of marine renewables 24 Grid 24 Planning and consenting 25 Environmental monitoring requirements 26 Skills 27 Public acceptability 27 7 Conclusion 30 Annex 1: Note of the visit to Orkney 34 Recommendations 31 Formal Minutes 35 Witnesses 36 List of printed written evidence 36 2 The Future of Marine Renewables in the UK 2 List of additional written evidence 37 List of Reports from the Committee during the current Parliament 38 The Future of Marine Renewables in the UK 3 Summary Wave and tidal stream energy (marine renewables) have the potential to benefit the UK: there is an abundance of resource (potentially enough to supply 20% of current electricity demand); they can provide a more reliable and predictable source of energy than some other types of renewables; they could help cut carbon emissions; and they could provide new jobs and industries. As the current world leader in the development of marine renewables, the UK could also benefit by exporting goods and skills as other markets begin to emerge around the world. The UK should follow the example set by Denmark in the 1980s in establishing a domestic wind power industry. Adopting a similar vision for a marine industry in the UK could help to accelerate development in the sector and to secure benefits for the UK. Attracting investment will be key to the development of marine renewables technologies. Investors want a stable and consistent policy regime to give them confidence to invest. They also need to have confidence that there is a long-term, viable market for the technology that they are backing. Market signals through revenue support schemes like the Renewables Obligation are one way of providing this. Investors are unwilling to take on excessive risks. Splitting the costs between the private and public sectors may help to reduce risks, as could addressing practical barriers (such as a lack of grid connections). Marine renewables are part of a much larger landscape of low-carbon energy technologies, which includes nuclear and carbon capture and storage as well as other types of renewables, they could play an important role as part of a low-carbon energy mix in the future. But their very high cost at their present state of development means they are unlikely to make much, if any, contribution before 2020. The priority over the next decade must be to focus on reducing the cost of marine renewables. The Government should clearly set out its expectations of industry in this regard so that progress can be monitored. If cost reductions are delivered successfully, more ambitious plans for the deployment of marine renewables can then be adopted. Potential obstacles fall into three categories: bureaucratic, financial and practical. Many organisations are involved in providing funding and support to the sector. A more streamlined approach may reduce duplication and inefficiency in funding schemes. The formation of the Low Carbon Innovation Group is a step in the right direction, but we would like to see further action to simplify the funding landscape. We also hope that the Department will minimise bureaucracy for applicants to the £20m fund that is available for testing arrays, potentially by developing a joint pre- qualification process with the £18m fund that is available from the Scottish Government. The proposal to increase revenue support to five Renewables Obligation Certificates (ROCs) per MWh has been widely welcomed by the industry and it will encourage investors. However, there is still a great deal of uncertainty about the level of revenue support that will be provided beyond 2017 and how levels are likely to change over time. The Department must provide clarity on these matters as soon as possible. It must also consider how to prevent costs to consumers beyond 2017 from becoming excessive. Practical obstacles include access to grid connections, the planning and consenting 4 The Future of Marine Renewables in the UK process and accessing a suitably skilled workforce. It is important to address these issues now to ensure that the development of the sector is not blocked in the future. Gaining acceptance from members of the public is also important . Although it is still early days for marine renewables, the potential longer-term benefits associated with developing a thriving wave and tidal industry in the UK are significant. An overly cautious approach may allow other countries to steal the UK’s lead. It is vital that DECC continues to support the development of these technologies so that the UK can retain its leadership position. The Future of Marine Renewables in the UK 5 1 Introduction 1. The seas and oceans represent a large potential source of renewable energy but, unlike wind turbines and solar panels, technologies that can achieve the Holy grail and “turn sea water into electricity” are still in their infancy1. If captured effectively, the energy contained in waves and the flow of the tides could provide a clean and reliable source of electricity. With the largest wave and tidal resource in Europe, the UK could gain substantial benefits from marine renewables. 2. The UK is currently the world leader in the development of wave and tidal stream technologies.2 Of the eight full-scale prototype devices installed worldwide, seven are in the UK.3 This success is the result of a number of factors: an abundant natural resource, a long history of academic research on wave and tidal power, world-class testing facilities and a strong skills base in other maritime industries.4 3. Our inquiry was prompted by DECC’s decision to close the £50m Marine Renewables Deployment Fund and to replace it with a £20m innovation fund but it has not been limited to it. We have also examined the opportunities for the UK in developing wave and tidal energy and assessed the effectiveness of the Government’s broader policy measures in this area. 4. In this report, we use the phrase “tidal energy” to refer to tidal stream energy (unless otherwise stated). While we recognise that tidal range technologies (such as tidal barrages and tidal lagoons) could also make a significant contribution to the UK’s energy system, we have not looked in detail at this family of technologies. This is because this group of technologies is more mature (La Rance tidal barrage in France has been operational since 19665) and therefore faces a very different set of challenges around deployment and support than those faced by nascent technologies such as wave and tidal stream.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identification of Pressures and Impacts Arising Frm Strategic Development
    Report for Scottish Environment Protection Agency/ Neil Deasley Planning and European Affairs Manager Scottish Natural Heritage Scottish Environment Protection Agency Erskine Court The Castle Business Park Identification of Pressures and Impacts Stirling FK9 4TR Arising From Strategic Development Proposed in National Planning Policy Main Contributors and Development Plans Andrew Smith John Pomfret Geoff Bodley Neil Thurston Final Report Anna Cohen Paul Salmon March 2004 Kate Grimsditch Entec UK Limited Issued by ……………………………………………… Andrew Smith Approved by ……………………………………………… John Pomfret Entec UK Limited 6/7 Newton Terrace Glasgow G3 7PJ Scotland Tel: +44 (0) 141 222 1200 Fax: +44 (0) 141 222 1210 Certificate No. FS 13881 Certificate No. EMS 69090 09330 h:\common\environmental current projects\09330 - sepa strategic planning study\c000\final report.doc In accordance with an environmentally responsible approach, this document is printed on recycled paper produced from 100% post-consumer waste or TCF (totally chlorine free) paper COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary Report No: Contractor : Entec UK Ltd BACKGROUND The work was commissioned jointly by SEPA and SNH. The project sought to identify potential pressures and impacts on Scottish Water bodies as a consequence of land use proposals within the current suite of Scottish development Plans and other published strategy documents. The report forms part of the background information being collected by SEPA for the River Basin Characterisation Report in relation to the Water Framework Directive. The project will assist SNH’s environmental audit work by providing an overview of trends in strategic development across Scotland. MAIN FINDINGS Development plans post 1998 were reviewed to ensure up-to-date and relevant information.
    [Show full text]
  • Tordess Oeeupiedi
    THE SCOTTISH CAMPAIGN TO RESIST THE ATOMIC MENACE,2 AINSLIE PLACE,E~INBURGH.031-2?5 7752 ISSN 0140- 7340 No 8 October/November 1978 lOp TORDESS OEEUPIEDI ---protesters rebuild cottage---- On 30th September the date on which the tenant farmers on the Torness site gave up their land to the SSEB, the 15 members of the Torness Alliance moved on. Supported by a group of similar size outwith the site; they immediately began to rebuild the derilict 'Half Moon' cottage, which is seen as a base for the occupation. This m·ove, to non-violent direct action and civil disobedience, was not taken without careful thought and planning.Clearly Mr. Millan, the Secretary of State, has decided to turn a deaf ear to any objections to Torness - whether they come from anyi- nuclear groups or the Labour · controlled Lothian Regional Council~ Thus, in the spirit of the Torness declaration, non-violent direct action is the only option availabl e if the power sta!on is to be stopped. DE COMMISSIONING FRIENDLY THE HIDDEN PROBLEMS Those participating (from all over Britain) British nuclear This statement, however, carefully planned this companies have deliberately flies i n the face of action; and of necessit y played down the difficulties evidence , both from t he trained in non-violent involved in scrapping atomic United States and the A. E.A's techniques. This planning pl ant. own sc-ientists. Their has paid off the l ocal report s claim t hat outworn community has rallied round According to a r.ecent plants are highly radioact ive in support and materials for 'Guardian' repor.t the Atomic and should be l eft for the reconstruction of the Ener gy Authority "is certain 100- 150 years for the cottage have been readily · that i t could demolish a r adi at ion t o " cool down" ma.de available; and the· nuclear react or local police have been comprehensivel y enough to b efoo=~=~]J univer sally friendly.
    [Show full text]
  • A Scoping Study On: Research Into Changes in Sediment Dynamics Linked to Marine Renewable Energy Installations
    A Scoping Study on: Research into Changes in Sediment Dynamics Linked to Marine Renewable Energy Installations Laurent Amoudry3, Paul S. Bell3, Kevin S. Black2, Robert W. Gatliff1 Rachel Helsby2, Alejandro J. Souza3, Peter D. Thorne3, Judith Wolf3 April 2009 1British Geological Survey Murchison House West Mains Road Edinburgh EH9 3LA [email protected] www.bgs.ac.uk 2Partrac Ltd 141 St James Rd Glasgow G4 0LT [email protected] www.partrac.com 3Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory Joseph Proudman Building 6 Brownlow Street Liverpool L3 5DA, www.pol.ac.uk 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study scopes research into the impacts and benefits of large-scale coastal and offshore marine renewable energy projects in order to allow NERC to develop detailed plans for research activities in the 2009 Theme Action Plans. Specifically this study focuses on understanding changes in sediment dynamics due to renewable energy structures. Three overarching science ideas have emerged where NERC could provide a significant contribution to the knowledge base. Research into these key areas has the potential to help the UK with planning, regulation and monitoring of marine renewable installations in a sustainable way for both stakeholders and the environment. A wide ranging consultation with stakeholders was carried out encompassing regulators, developers, researchers and other marine users with a relevance to marine renewable energy and/or sediment dynamics. Based on this consultation a review of the present state of knowledge has been produced, and a relevant selection of recent and current research projects underway within the UK identified to which future NERC funded research could add value. A great deal of research has already been done by other organisations in relation to the wind sector although significant gaps remain, particularly in long term and far-field effects.
    [Show full text]
  • An Offshore Renewables Capacity Study for Dorset Dorset C-SCOPE Project
    An Offshore Renewables Capacity Study for Dorset Dorset C-SCOPE Project Dorset Coast Forum 1 April 2010 Final Report 9V5867 Stratus House Emperor Way Exeter, Devon EX1 3QS United Kingdom +44 (0)1392 447999 Telephone Fax [email protected] E-mail www.royalhaskoning.com Internet Document title An Offshore Renewables Capacity Study for Dorset Dorset C-SCOPE Project Document short title Offshore Renewables Capacity Study Status Final Report Date 1 April 2010 Project name Offshore Renewables Capacity Study Project number 9V5867 Client Dorset Coast Forum Reference 9V5867/R/303424/Exet Drafted by J. Trendall, G. Chapman & P. Gaches Checked by Peter Gaches Date/initials check …………………. …………………. Approved by Steve Challinor Date/initials approval …………………. …………………. This report has been produced by Haskoning UK Ltd. solely for Dorset Coast Forum in accordance with the terms of appointment for Dorset Offshore Renewables Capacity Study dated 01.02.2010 and should not be relied upon by third parties for any use whatsoever without express permission in writing from Haskoning UK Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, including photocopying or, transmitted by electronic means, or stored in an electronic retrieval system without express permission in writing from Haskoning UK Ltd. CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Study Overview 2 2 CURRENT TECHNOLOGIES REVIEW 2 2.1 Offshore Wind Technology Overview 2 2.2 Offshore Tidal Stream Technology Overview 9 2.3 Offshore Wave Technology Overview 9 2.4 Wave
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Trust 2020
    Acknowledgments This summary report has been produced by the Carbon Trust, with specific sections informed by studies delivered by the following external technical contractors: • Turbine requirements and foundation scaling: Ramboll • Heavy lift offshore operations: Seaway 7 • Dynamic export cable development: BPP Cable Solutions • Monitoring and inspection: Oceaneering Study results are based on an impartial analysis of primary and secondary sources, including expert interviews. The Carbon Trust would like to thank everyone who has contributed their time and expertise during the preparation and completion of these studies. Special thanks to the following organisations: ABS, AeroDyn, Boskalis, BV, ClassNK, DEIF, DEME Offshore, DNV GL, Glosten, GustoMSC, Ideol, Lloyd's Register, LM Wind Power Blades, MESH Engineering, MHI Vestas, NREL, Principle Power, Royal IHC and Offshore Wind Logistics / Saipem, SBM Offshore, Senvion, Siemens Gamesa, SSB, SwissRe, TheSwitch, Timken, TÜV Nord, Valmont SM Disclaimer The key findings presented in this report represent general results and conclusions that are not specific to individual floating wind concepts. Caution should therefore be taken in generalising findings to specific technologies. It should be noted that information and findings do not necessarily reflect the views of the supporting industry partners but are based on independent analysis undertaken by the Carbon Trust and respective external technical contractors. Published: July 2020 The Carbon Trust’s mission is to accelerate the move to a sustainable, low carbon economy. It is a world leading expert on carbon reduction and clean technology. As a not-for-dividend group, it advises governments and leading companies around the world, reinvesting profits into its low carbon mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Coasts and Seas of the United Kingdom. Region 4 South-East Scotland: Montrose to Eyemouth
    Coasts and seas of the United Kingdom Region 4 South-east Scotland: Montrose to Eyemouth edited by J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson, S.S. Kaznowska, J.P. Doody, N.C. Davidson & A.L. Buck Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY UK ©JNCC 1997 This volume has been produced by the Coastal Directories Project of the JNCC on behalf of the project Steering Group. JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team Project directors Dr J.P. Doody, Dr N.C. Davidson Project management and co-ordination J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson Editing and publication S.S. Kaznowska, A.L. Buck, R.M. Sumerling Administration & editorial assistance J. Plaza, P.A. Smith, N.M. Stevenson The project receives guidance from a Steering Group which has more than 200 members. More detailed information and advice comes from the members of the Core Steering Group, which is composed as follows: Dr J.M. Baxter Scottish Natural Heritage R.J. Bleakley Department of the Environment, Northern Ireland R. Bradley The Association of Sea Fisheries Committees of England and Wales Dr J.P. Doody Joint Nature Conservation Committee B. Empson Environment Agency C. Gilbert Kent County Council & National Coasts and Estuaries Advisory Group N. Hailey English Nature Dr K. Hiscock Joint Nature Conservation Committee Prof. S.J. Lockwood Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Sciences C.R. Macduff-Duncan Esso UK (on behalf of the UK Offshore Operators Association) Dr D.J. Murison Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment & Fisheries Department Dr H.J. Prosser Welsh Office Dr J.S. Pullen WWF-UK (Worldwide Fund for Nature) Dr P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Energy River: Realising Energy Potential from the River Mersey
    The Energy River: Realising Energy Potential from the River Mersey June 2017 Amani Becker, Andy Plater Department of Geography and Planning, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZT Judith Wolf National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool L3 5DA This page has been intentionally left blank ii Acknowledgements The work herein has been funded jointly by the University of Liverpool’s Knowledge Exchange and Impact Voucher Scheme and Liverpool City Council. The contribution of those involved in the project through Liverpool City Council, Christine Darbyshire, and Liverpool City Region LEP, James Johnson and Mark Knowles, is gratefully acknowledged. The contribution of Michela de Dominicis of the National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool, for her work producing a tidal array scenario for the Mersey Estuary is also acknowledged. Thanks also to the following individuals approached during the timeframe of the project: John Eldridge (Cammell Laird), Jack Hardisty (University of Hull), Neil Johnson (Liverpool City Council) and Sue Kidd (University of Liverpool). iii This page has been intentionally left blank iv Executive summary This report has been commissioned by Liverpool City Council (LCC) and joint-funded through the University of Liverpool’s Knowledge Exchange and Impact Voucher Scheme to explore the potential to obtain renewable energy from the River Mersey using established and emerging technologies. The report presents an assessment of current academic literature and the latest industry reports to identify suitable technologies for generation of renewable energy from the Mersey Estuary, its surrounding docks and Liverpool Bay. It also contains a review of energy storage technologies that enable cost-effective use of renewable energy. The review is supplemented with case studies where technologies have been implemented elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for Scotland's Electricity and Gas Networks
    A vision for Scotland’s electricity and gas networks DETAIL 2019 - 2030 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 2 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM 03 The policy context 04 Supporting wider Scottish Government policies 07 The gas and electricity networks today 09 CHAPTER 2: DEVELOPING THE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE 13 Electricity 17 Gas 24 CHAPTER 3: COORDINATING THE TRANSITION 32 Regulation and governance 34 Whole system planning 36 Network funding 38 CHAPTER 4: SCOTLAND LEADING THE WAY – INNOVATION AND SKILLS 39 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 3 CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 4 SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM Our Vision: By 2030… Scotland’s energy system will have changed dramatically in order to deliver Scotland’s Energy Strategy targets for renewable energy and energy productivity. We will be close to delivering the targets we have set for 2032 for energy efficiency, low carbon heat and transport. Our electricity and gas networks will be fundamental to this progress across Scotland and there will be new ways of designing, operating and regulating them to ensure that they are used efficiently. The policy context The energy transition must also be inclusive – all parts of society should be able to benefit. The Scotland’s Energy Strategy sets out a vision options we identify must make sense no matter for the energy system in Scotland until 2050 – what pathways to decarbonisation might targeting a sustainable and low carbon energy emerge as the best. Improving the efficiency of system that works for all consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Flood Greenhouse Effect Plutonium Flights of Fancy Ministry
    ., Th~ Safe Energy ,J - Journal - July I August 19 88 75p Before the Flood Greenhouse Effect Plutonium Fl ights of Fancy Ministry of Truth - Chernobyl Lies CONTENTS COMMENT Flights of Fancy? 3 In the words of Or Tom Wheldon, at the Fourth STEVE MARTIN reviews the regulatory Annual Low Level Radiation and Health Conference log-jam in the US over planned held in Stirling, to say that radiation has existed in plutonium flights from Europe to Japan. the environment since the dawn of humankind and News 4-7 is therefore not a problem is just as daft as saying Ministry of Truth 8-9 that crocodiles have been around since the begin­ PATRICK GREEN accuses MAFF of ning with no perceived adverse effects - they will trying to rewrite history in their evidence to the Agriculture Com­ still bite your leg off, given half a chance. mittee. The Irresistible Force 10-11 The second report on the incidence of childhood meets the Immovable Object leukaemia near Dounreay from COMARE, of which ANDREW HOLMES asks what will Or Wheldon is a member, is a valuable contribution happen to nuclear research after privatisation. to the debate; but don't forget what happened to Snug as a Bug ••• 12 the 1976 Flowers Report. For the uninitiated, DON ARNOTT assesses the evidence Flowers recommended, among other things, that no that bacteria have been found in the large scale nuclear power ordering programme be burned-out core of the Three Mile Is­ land reactor. embarked on until the nuclear waste problem had Milk of Human Kindness? 14-15 been solved.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Technology Yearbook
    Offshore Technology Yearbook 2 O19 Generation V: power for generations Since we released our fi rst offshore direct drive turbines, we have been driven to offer our customers the best possible offshore solutions while maintaining low risk. Our SG 10.0-193 DD offshore wind turbine does this by integrating the combined knowledge of almost 30 years of industry experience. With 94 m long blades and a 10 MW capacity, it generates ~30 % more energy per year compared to its predecessor. So that together, we can provide power for generations. www.siemensgamesa.com 2 O19 20 June 2019 03 elcome to reNEWS Offshore Technology are also becoming more capable and the scope of Yearbook 2019, the fourth edition of contracts more advanced as the industry seeks to Wour comprehensive reference for the drive down costs ever further. hardware and assets required to deliver an As the growth of the offshore wind industry offshore wind farm. continues apace, so does OTY. Building on previous The offshore wind industry is undergoing growth OTYs, this 100-page edition includes a section on in every aspect of the sector and that is reflected in crew transfer vessel operators, which play a vital this latest edition of OTY. Turbines and foundations role in servicing the industry. are getting physically larger and so are the vessels As these pages document, CTVs and their used to install and service them. operators are evolving to meet the changing needs The growing geographical spread of the sector of the offshore wind development community. So is leading to new players in the fabrication space too are suppliers of installation vessels, cable-lay springing up and players in other markets entering vessels, turbines and other components.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability in the Power Sector 2010 Update Europe
    Sustainability in the Power Sector 2010 Update - Europe Tim Steinweg, Albert ten Kate & Kristóf Rácz November 2010 Sustainability in the Power Sector 2010 Update - Europe Sustainability in the Power Sector 2010 update: Europe Tim Steinweg, Albert ten Kate & Kristóf Rácz (SOMO) Amsterdam, November 2010 1 Colophon Sustainability in the Power Sector 2010 Update - Europe November 2010 Authors: Tim Steinweg, Albert ten Kate & Kristóf Rácz Cover design: Annelies Vlasblom ISBN: 978-90-71284-63-2 Funding This publication has been produced with the financial assistance of Greenpeace Nederland. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of SOMO and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of Greenpeace Nederland. Published by Stichting Onderzoek Multinationale Ondernemingen Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations Sarphatistraat 30 1018 GL Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel: + 31 (20) 6391291 Fax: + 31 (20) 6391321 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.somo.nl This document is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivateWorks 2.5 License. 2 Sustainability in the Power Sector 2010 Update - Europe Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................... 3 List of Figures................................................................................................................. 5 List of Tables .................................................................................................................. 5 Abbreviations
    [Show full text]
  • The Design Studio Brief in Architecture's
    Charrette:essay Tales and tools: the Design Studio Brief in Architecture’s expanded field. Suzanne Ewing. Edinburgh School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, University of Edinburgh. ABSTRACT This essay argues that the Design Studio Brief establishes tacit disciplinary practices of architecture, as well as more explicit pursuit of topics of formulated relevance or concern. A series of tales of Design Studio Briefs from the fourth year of study at one UK Architecture School are sampled at dates which coincide with significant moments in Scotland’s recent constitutional history: the 1979 devolution Referendum, the 1997/1999 establishment of the Scottish Parliament, and the 2014 Independence Referendum. The tales are followed by a discussion on tools: towards means and practices which might inform the re-tooling of the Design Studio Brief and its ends. KEYWORDS design studio brief, disciplinary practices, architectural education Over the past forty years the field of global Higher Education economy. Allied to Architecture has expanded in scope and in the funding conditions which redefine national and potential of architectural design as subject and transnational educational responsibilities, what practice.1 Focus has shifted from site to field, educational capital is and what it is for, from static object to moving project.2 requires a refreshed ethical position.5 Preoccupations of Design Studios in architectural education have shifted from Euro- Architectural Design Studios are often known centric sites and artefacts deemed worthy
    [Show full text]