SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY• 10000 ENERGY DRIVE • SPRING, TX 77389 November 8-9, 2017 SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY• 10000 ENERGY DRIVE • SPRING, TX 77389 November 8-9, 2017 Geomechanics in Unconventionals
Please join us for Geomechanicsthe Houston Geological S0ciet iny1s Upremiernco twonventionals day technical conference, focusing on geomechanical integration and advancement in the assessment of unconventional reservoirs. Please join us for the Houston Geological S0ciety1s premier two day technical conference, focusing The program will highlight field examples of geomechanical workflows, with sessions focusing on on geomechanical integration and advancement in the assessment of unconventional reservoirs. Unconventional Geology & Geophysics, and Integrated Workflows & Engineering Design. The program will highlight field examples of geomechanical workflows, with sessions focusing on Unconventional GeoWednesdaylogy & Geophysics, AM Session and In1 te -grated Geomechan Workflowsical Characterization & Engineering Design. Wednesday PM Session 2 - Engineering Applications Thursday AM Session 3 - Surveillance and Diagnostics ThursdayWednesday PM AM SessionSession 41 - -Case Geomechan Studiesical Characterization Wednesday PM Session 2 - Engineering Applications Thursday AM Session 3 - Surveillance and Diagnostics Thursday PM Session 4 - Case StudiesPlatinum Gold Silver Bronze Sponsorship Opportunities Sponsor Sponsors Sponsors Sponsor $10,000 $5,000 $2,500 $1 ,000 Platinum Gold Silver Bronze AdvertisementSponsorship in Program Opportunities Book FullSponsor Page 1/2Sponsors Page 1/4Sponsors Page 1/8Sponsor Page Complimentary Full Registrations $10,0004 $5,000 2 $2,5001 $1 ,000 AdvertisementComplimentary in Vendor Program Booth Book Full" Page 1/2" Page 1/4" Page 1/8 Page ComplimentaryRecognition in ProgramFull Registrations Book, onsite signage, HGS Bulletin "4 " 2 "1 " ComplimeRecognitionntary in conference Vendor Booth announcements and website with logo hyperlink "" "" "" " Recognition*Booths/Posters in Program Book,Assigned onsite signage,on first come, HGS Bulletinfirst serve basis with confirmation" of payment" " " Recognition in conference announcements and website with logo hyperlink " " " " *Booths/Posters Assigned on first come, first serve basis with confirmation of payment
sSouthwesternw Energy•n devon
For more information please visit: www.hgs.org or contact Andrea Peoples: [email protected] ----- sSouthwesternw Energy•n devon
For more information please visit: www.hgs.org or contact Andrea Peoples: [email protected] -----
SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY• 10000 ENERGY DRIVE • SPRING, TX 77389 November 8-9, 2017
Geomechanics in Unconventionals
Please join us for the Houston Geological S0ciety1s premier two day technical conference, focusing November o8-9,n geomec 2017 hanical integration and advancement in the assessment of unconventional reservoirs. SouthwesternThe Energy program • Spring, will highlight Texas field examples of geomechanical workflows, with sessions focusing on Unconventional Geology & Geophysics, and Integrated Workflows & Engineering Design.
ProceedingsWednesday Volume AM Session 1 - Geomechanical Characterization Wednesday PM Session 2 - Engineering Applications Thursday AM Session 3 - Surveillance and Diagnostics Table of ContentsThursday PM Session 4 - Case Studies Muster Point Locations ...... 5 Platinum Gold Silver Bronze Sponsorship Opportunities Sponsor Sponsors Sponsors Sponsor Sponsors ...... $10,0007, 9$5,000 $2,500 $1 ,000 Advertisement in Program Book Program ...... Full Page10-12 1/2 Page 1/4 Page 1/8 Page Complimentary Full Registrations 4 2 1 AbstractsComplimentary Vendor Booth " " " Orals Recognition . . . in. Program . . .Book, . onsite. . signage,. . . HGS . Bulletin...... " . 13 " " " Recognition in conference announcements and website with logo hyperlink Posters ...... " 63 " " " *Booths/Posters Assigned on first come, first serve basis with confirmation of payment Conference Committee ...... 78
sSouthwesternw Energy•n devon
For more information please visit: www.hgs.org or contact Andrea Peoples: [email protected] -----
Houston Geological Society | Applied Geoscience Conference | November 8 – 9, 2017 3 A LINE HAS BEEN DRAWN.
BETWEEN THE SAME WAY AND A NEW WAY.
BETWEEN ENERGY DEMAND AND ENERGY POTENTIAL.
BETWEEN MAINSTREAM AND FULLSTREAM.
BETWEEN THE INDUSTRIAL AND THE DIGITAL INDUSTRIAL.
BETWEEN SETTLING FOR TODAY AND DEFINING TOMORROW.
TODAY, A LINE HAS BEEN DRAWN.
AND THE PAST IS ON ONE SIDE AND WE’RE ON THE OTHER.
From the reservoir to the refinery. From the depths of the sea to the power of the cloud. BHGE is now the first and only fullstream provider to the oil and gas industry, leveraging the best minds and most intelligent machines to invent smarter ways to bring energy to the world.
Learn more at bhge.com
4 Houston Geological Society | Applied Geoscience Conference | November 8 – 9, 2017 Houston Geological Society | Applied Geoscience Conference | November 8 – 9, 2017 5 ONE COMPANY. UNLOCKING THOUSANDS OF OPPORTUNITIES.
A top producer in the oil and gas industry, Devon’s focus has always been getting the best results through integrity, innovation and teamwork. It’s the way we’ve done business for more than 45 years.
@DevonEnergy
Commitment Runs Deep
6 Houston Geological Society | Applied Geoscience Conference | November 8 – 9, 2017 November 8–9, 2017
Thanks to our Sponsors
Platinum University Poster Program Baker Hughes, a GE company Conference Venue SWN Energy Gold Pioneer Natural Resources Silver BHP Excellence Logging MetaRock Laboratories FracGeo Bronze Data Log Geological Services LMKR Thunder Exploration Printing Devon Energy
Houston Geological Society | Applied Geoscience Conference | November 8 – 9, 2017 7
AAAAKKKK SASKKAAKKSAS
BHP is proud to sponsor the Applied Geoscience 666666 6666 Conference. k6kkkk6k - . bhp.com sskss6k66 g66k66g6 gk66sgk66g6 - R - l l l -S l - SSS - - - s - - s - S - - t - s 6
8 Houston Geological Society | Applied Geoscience Conference | November 8 – 9, 2017 November 8–9, 2017 Thanks to our Sponsors
Houston Geological Society | Applied Geoscience Conference | November 8 – 9, 2017 9 November 8–9, 2017 Oral Presentations – Wednesday, November 8, 2017 7:00 Registration and Coffee
8:00 - 8:10 Welcome and Opening Remarks: Robert Hurt, Pioneer Natural Resources; Umesh Prasad, Baker Hughes, a GE company; John Adamick, TGS, HGS President 2017-2018; Ron Hayden, SWN Vice President of Technology
Session 1: Geomechanical Characterization Chairs: Shihong Chi, ION E&P Advisors ; Farid Reza Mohamed, Schlumberger
8:10 - 8:45 A Novel Geomechanical Characterization Methodology for Quantifying Fine Jesse Hampton, New England Scale Heterogeneity Research
8:45 - 9:20 Brittleness and Fracability in Stimulating Shale Reservoirs Mao Bai, Independent Geomechanics Consultant
9:20 - 9:40 Coffee, Posters, Exhibits
9:40 - 10:15 The Relationship between Natural Fracture Distribution and Elastic Mechanical Ron Nelson, Broken N Consulting, Properties in the Subsurface: Measurement and Calibration Inc.
10:15 - 10:50 A Novel Method for Experimental Determination of Biot’s Coefficient in Munir Aldin, MetaRock Unconventional Formations . Laboratories
10:55 - 11:55 Open Floor Discussion & Posters 11:55 - 1:00 Lunch, Posters, Exhibits
12:15 - 1:00 Keynote: What Maintains High Pore Pressure in Gas Shale During Terry Engelder, Exhumation, Long After Thermal Maturation Ceases? The Pennsylvania State University
Session 2: Engineering Applications Chairs: See Hong Ong, Baker Hughes, a GE company; Cem Ozan, BHP Petroleum
1:05 - 1:40 Complex Fracture Network Creation in Stimulation of Uncoventional Ahmad Ghassemi, The University Reservoirs of Oklahoma
1:40 - 2:15 Hydraulic Stimulation in the Presence of Fractures Tobias Hoeink, Baker Hughes, a GE company
2:15 - 2:35 Coffee, Posters, Exhibits
2:35 - 3:10 A Holistic Approach to Geologic and Geomechanical Modeling in Ewerton Araujo, Sebastian Unconventional Reservoirs PART 1 Bayer, Marcus Wunderle, BHP Petroleum
3:10 - 3:45 A Holistic Approach to Geologic and Geomechanical Modeling in Ewerton Araujo, Sebastian Unconventional Reservoirs PART 2 Bayer, Marcus Wunderle, BHP Petroleum
3:45 - 4:45 Open Floor Discussion & Posters 5:00 - 8:00 Social Hour
10 Houston Geological Society | Applied Geoscience Conference | November 8 – 9, 2017 November 8–9, 2017 Oral Presentations – Thursday, November 9, 2017 7:00 Registration and Coffee
8:00 - 8:10 Welcome and Opening Remarks: Robert Hurt, Pioneer Natural Resources; Umesh Prasad, Baker Hughes, a GE company; John Adamick, TGS, HGS President 2017-2018
Session 3: Surveillance and Diagnostics Chairs: Robert Hurt, Pioneer Natural Resources; Kim Hlava, Statoil
8:10 - 8:45 Validating Completion Design Using Monitoring of Offset Wells Erica Coenen, Reveal Technologies
8:45 - 9:20 DAS Microseismic Monitoring and Integration with Strain Measurements in Dan Kahn, Devon Energy Hydraulic Fracture Profiling
9:20 - 9:40 Coffee, Posters, Exhibits
9:40 - 10:15 Focal Mechanism Solutions of Microseismic Events from Hydraulic Fracture Rongmao Zhou, BHP Petroleum Monitoring: A Case Study of the Eagle Ford Shale
10:15 - 10:50 Integration of DAS Fiber-Based Strain and Microseismic Data for Monitoring Rob Hull, Pioneer Natural Horizontal Hydraulic Stimulations – Midland Basin Texas Examples Resources
10:55 - 11:55 Open Floor Discussion & Posters 11:55 - 1:00 Lunch, Posters, Exhibits
12:15 - 1:00 Keynote: Optimized Recovery from Unconventional Reservoirs: How Lans Taylor, Energy and Nanophysics, the Micro-Crack Debate, and Complex Fracture Geometry Geoscience Institute (EGI) at the Impact Operations University of Utah
Session 4: Case Studies Chairs: Joel Walls, Ingrain, a Halliburton service; BJ Davis, Baker Hughes a GE company
1:05 - 1:40 Quantifying the Impact of Induced Asymmetric Fracturing from Horizontal Doug Walser, Halliburton Development Wellbores; a Geostatistical Perspective
1:40 - 2:15 Efficient Well Delivery in Shale Plays – Examples from the Marcellus and Julie Kowan, J. Kowan Consulting, Permian LLC
2:15 - 2:35 Coffee, Posters, Exhibits
2:35 - 3:10 Characterization of Fractures from Borehole Images Sandeep Mukherjee, Halliburton
3:10 - 3:45 Lateral Characterization and Fracture Optimization Solution with Case Studies Sergey Kotov, Baker Hughes, a GE company
3:45 - 4:45 Open Floor Discussion & Posters
Closing Comments and Invitation to Posters
Poster Session Invited Presentations from Graduate Students • Open during Coffee and Lunch Breaks
Houston Geological Society | Applied Geoscience Conference | November 8 – 9, 2017 11 November 8–9, 2017 Posters – November 8-9, 2017 Poster Session Chair: Mike Effler University Student Name Poster Topic Georgia Institute of Ming Lui and Haiying Huang A Poroelastic Solution of Rigid Sphere Indentation into a Technology Compressible Half-Space Texas A&M University Anusarn Sangnimnuan and Development of an Efficient Coupled Fluid Flow and Jiawei Li, Kan Wu Geomechanics Model to Predict Stress Evolution in Unconventional Reservoirs with Complex Fracture Geometry Texas A&M University Arash Shadravan and Behrouz Geomechancal Cement Sheath Finite Element Modeling to Haghgouyan Achieve Enhanced Zonal Isolation Texas A&M University Edith Sotelo Gamboa and Fracture Compliance: Relationship with Fracture Conductivity Richard L . Gibson and effect on Wave Propagation Texas A&M University Guangjian Xu, Judith Chester Developing a Mechanical Stratigraphic Model of the Eagle Ford and Fred Chester Formation The University of Oklahoma Ishank Gupta, Carl Sondergeld Water Weakening: Case Study from Marcellus, Woodford and and Chandra Rai Eagle Ford The University of Oklahoma Alex Vachaparampil and Ahmad Failure Characteristics of Three Shales under True-Triaxial Ghassemi Compression The University of Oklahoma Zhi Ye and Ahmad Ghassemi Mechanical Properties and Permeability Evolution of Shale Fractures under Triaxial Loading The University of Texas Matthew Ramos, D N. . Espinoza, Stress-Dependent Dynamic-Static Transforms of Anisotropic C I. . Torres-Verdín, K T. . Spikes Mancos Shale and S E. . Laubach University of Calgary Bram Komaromi, Dr . Per Kent Facies-Controlled Fracture Stratigraphy in Organic-Rich Pedersen and Dr . Paul MacKay Petroleum Systems, Turonian Second White Specks Formation, Southwestern Alberta University of Houston Ismot Jahan, John Castagna, and Characterization of Faults Using Seismic Attributes From 3D Michael Murphy Seismic Data in the Bakken Formation
University of Houston Ali Rezaei Effect of Pore Pressure Depletion on Horizontal Stresses and Propagation of New Fractures during Refracturing Process
12 Houston Geological Society | Applied Geoscience Conference | November 8 – 9, 2017 November 8–9, 2017
Abstracts Oral Presentations Day One November 8, 2017 Southwestern Energy Spring, Texas Wednesday, November 8, 2017 | Session 1 | 8:10 Jesse Hampton, G. Boitnott, L. Louis New England Research White River Junction, Vermont A Novel Geomechanical Characterization Methodology for Quantifying Fine Scale Heterogeneity
Summary heterogeneity observed in a Wolfcamp core can be seen in The integration of plug and log scale characterization is key to Figure 1. generating representative engineering inputs for geomechanical models in oil and gas exploration and development . The Mechanical and Poroelastic Anisotropy importance of plug measurements is especially vital in finely It is possible to measure 4 of the 5 independent static moduli for laminated rocks where well-log scale measurements miss a single plug with the plug axis parallel to bedding . The static mechanical heterogeneities that are required for realistic elastic moduli are measured by fitting the stress versus strain mechanical models . The presence of mechanical heterogeneity response to a sequence of loading cycles . Using this method we and anisotropy under the well log resolution is commonplace measure all the static moduli except C44=1/S44=G . The static in unconventional plays and can deeply impact geomechanical test can be continued with a sequence of confining and pore assessments ranging from wellbore integrity to horizontal pressure cycles after the introduction of pore fluid to constrain stress estimates . a poroelastic model including the anisotropic Biot parameters αv and αh . The first part of the presentation will focus on a few laboratory- based inputs that are increasingly being recognized as high The horizontal samples can then be conditioned and tested impact . We will address the topics of continuous mechanical for anisotropic dynamic moduli using both axial and radial profiling, and anisotropy quantification for both poroelastic compression- and polarized shear-wave ultrasonic velocity constants including the extraction of an anisotropic stiffness transducers . A three-axis velocity test can be performed to tensor and Biot coefficients . measure the five independent stiffnesses (including C13), and thus compute all of the VTI elastic constants . In a second part, we will address the optimization aspect . To that effect, we will suggest ways to greatly increase workflow From a single horizontal plug, dynamic/static and poroelastic relevance and efficiency by relying on the use of petrophysical VTI properties are measured which greatly reduces the core scanning for screening, rock typing, and plug picking . uncertainty in multiple measurements using plugs that could New closed loop workflows allow for upscaling lab observations sample several bedding layers, if vertical or 45° can be obtained to the log scale at different stages of the process, thus providing at all . This process of using horizontal plugs lends itself well to an early option for decision making . the use of rotary sidewalls as well .
Continuous Mechanical Profiling Optimization and Upscaling NER’s Core AutoScan is a unique measurement platform There arises two large core to log integration problems when developed for the detailed quantitative and efficient description fine scale heterogeneity data is not available or used, (1) of core properties . It is capable of scanning at the millimeter plugs typically chosen based on well-log scale information scale slabbed whole core or plugs for gas permeability, in unconventionals are often consisting of several rock types resistivity, ultrasonic compressional- and shear-wave velocities, (mechanical, compositional, petrophysical) which makes composition, mechanical strength, and elastic stiffness individual plug interpretation cumbersome at best and (Impulse Hammer) . The Impulse Hammer was originally impossible at worst, and (2) if one is able to interpret plug data developed to provide a non-destructive method to measure the coming from a sample consisting of several rock types, how mechanical profile along a core . The Impulse Hammer captures is this data then integrated back into the log scale? To this the physics of the impact by measuring the force-time function end, the mm scale measurements made with the AutoScan as the indenter is free falling onto the sample surface, and thus apparatus can provide enough information for rock typing two independent parameters can be extracted, reduced Young’s using composition, mechanical, or petrophysical properties at modulus and an impulse hardness . An example of fine scale several scales, and thus provide detailed estimations of where
14 Houston Geological Society | Applied Geoscience Conference | November 8 – 9, 2017 Figure 1. Small section (three feet) of the large Wolfcamp dataset showing fine scale heterogeneity information and comparison between mechanical properties and composition, separated by mudstone type. plugs are required, and where traditional plugging plans may Biographical Sketch provide redundant or no information on several rock types . The Jesse Hampton joined New optimized plug sample scheme typically requires fewer total England Research, Inc . samples, and provides a more intuitive interaction between the as a Principal Scientist in plug and log scale . 2015 . His specialties include experimental rock mechanics Upscaling workflows using these datasets can generally take and non-destructive evaluation three paths depending on what data is available (1) plug (NDE) for the purpose of information applied directly to logs, (2) plugs plus AutoScan reservoir rock and fracture upscaling using core only, and (3) core calibrated upscaled characterization . He has transforms, from (2), applied to logs . The full presentation will previously been involved discuss these aspects in more detail and compare/contrast the with development of several results of each using the Wolfcamp shale as an example . NDE analysis techniques and Figure 1 shows some of the Wolfcamp dataset consisting of fine equipment design aimed at scale model testing of microfracture scale heterogeneity information from the AutoScan, as well as generation and coalescence . Jesse has also developed multiple the rock types determined at the log and sub-log resolution patents related to material characterization, both downhole (far right column) . ■ and in the laboratory, as well as downhole fracture generation methods for enhanced hydrocarbon recovery . He presently helps NER in the development and anal¬ysis of geomechanics and petrophysics testing programs to aid in reservoir rock characterization and model generation . His current research involves the development of methodologies suited for contact measurements to determine elastic and inelastic rock properties and strength . He holds a PhD from Colorado School of Mines in Civil Engineering .
Houston Geological Society | Applied Geoscience Conference | November 8 – 9, 2017 15 Wednesday, November 8, 2017 | Session 1 | 8:45 Mao Bai Geomechanics Consultant Brittleness and Fracability in Stimulating Shale Gas Reservoirs
Summary material under load, a brittle material has a relatively shorter In the present study of stimulating unconventional shale plastic deformation and responds dominantly by the elastic reservoirs, brittleness index profiling along the reservoir deformation . With respect to fracability, it is about the rock payzone to identify the most desirable perforated intervals has failure under the ultimate rock strength in either a brittle or become a common practice . The profile is considered as an ductile formation . In comparison, the higher fracable formation indispensable geomechanics component in the approaches should have smaller formation strength than the lower fracable in the petrophysical domain . However, this paper challenges formation . In consequence, it is not certain that the brittle the validity of the brittleness index profiling method . With formation is easier to fracture than the ductile formation since objective review and sensible definition of brittleness used a brittle formation may have greater strength than a ductile in the present petrophysical field to identify the desirable formation even though the exceptions may exist . fracturing intervals, the paper presents the ambiguities of using brittleness to define the formation fracability, and points out More complications arise when evaluating the responses that the formation brittleness can be unrelated to the formation of subsurface formations at great depth than the formation fracability . As an alternative approach, this paper provides types (e .g . brittle formation or ductile formation) . Under an effective method to define the most fracable formation this condition, the impact of confinement on the fracability intervals in designing the hydraulic fracturing in tight shale cannot be ignored . In general, a formation subject to higher gas formations . confinement pressure is more difficult to fracture as the formation strength is greater . Conversely, a formation subject Content to lower confinement pressure is easier to fracture since the With respect to brittleness, it is about the type of material formation strength is smaller . and its related strength . In comparison with a ductile
Figure 1 Example yield point is the cutoff value in the transition failure between brittle (lower confinement) and ductile (higher confinement) rock failures in a Mohr-Coulomb chart.
16 Houston Geological Society | Applied Geoscience Conference | November 8 – 9, 2017 In view of efficient stimulation of shale gas reservoirs, it is References unclear whether we should choose the brittle interval or the Bai, M . (2016), Why are brittleness and fracability not ductile interval to fracture as the strength of either interval is equivalent in designing hydraulic fracturing in tight shale gas unknown . However, it is apparent that we should choose the reservoirs, Petroleum, Vol . 2, 1-19, ISSN 2405-6561, SwPU, formation interval with a higher fracability, which is equivalent Elsevier . to the lower formation strength . Under similar confinements, the lower formation strength may be indicated by a smaller Biographical Sketch unconfined compressive strength (UCS) . As a result, it is Mao Bai received the Ph .D . advisable that the most fracable interval is the one with degree in mineral engineering lowest UCS . in 1991 from Pennsylvania State University . Afterwards, When evaluating present technology, the formation brittleness he worked as a senior should no longer be the associated subject matter as we are research associate at the unclear about its role to improve the fracability of a tight Rock Mechanics Institute formation . Disassociating the brittleness from fracability (University of Oklahoma) enables us to focus on identifying the true mechanisms for between 1991 and 2000; as a efficient fracturing of tight shale reservoirs . senior engineer at TerraTek (a Schlumberger company) Conclusions between 2000 and 2007; as a Formation brittleness and ductility are not related to formation senior geomechanics specialist at Geomechanics International mechanical properties such as Young’s modulus and Poisson’s (a Baker Hughes company) between 2007 and 2008; as a ratio, as commonly used in brittleness index profiling . Instead, principal consultant/senior advisor at global consulting formation brittleness and ductility are related to the rock division of Halliburton between 2008 and 2013; and as a staff strength such as unconfined compressive strength (UCS) or geomechanics specialist at BHP Billiton between 2013 and fracture toughness . 2015 . He is currently a geomechanics consultant .
It is ambiguous to relate formation brittleness to formation fracability, since a brittle formation may have greater rock strength under higher confinement, making it more difficult to fracture, and vice versa .
The formation fracability is about the ultimate rock failure defined by the formation breakdown pressure . The breakdown pressure can be identified in unrestricted fracturing using the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) as a benchmark value . However, it is difficult or sometimes impossible to identify the breakdown pressure in restricted fracturing since the fracturing treatment is limited in size and is often localized, while the extended free fracture propagation is not apparent from the bottom hole pressure response . Under this condition, the formation fracability may be determined from the fracture toughness based dynamic fracturing process .
Disassociating formation brittleness from formation fracability allows us to correctly determine the most fracable formation intervals to perforate .
This presentation proposes an effective approach to select the desirable intervals to stimulate, i e. ,. select the weak spots determined from a formation UCS profile to establish the perforated intervals . The proposed method is supported by many early experimental studies . ■
Houston Geological Society | Applied Geoscience Conference | November 8 – 9, 2017 17 Wednesday, November 8, 2017 | Session 1 | 9:40 Ron A. Nelson, Broken N Consulting Cat Spring, Texas The Relationship Between Natural Fracture Distribution and Elastic Mechanical Properties in the Subsurface: Measurement and Calibration
Natural and completion-related fractures are very important Young’s Modulus and, alternately, Rigidity Modulus at the time in production of oil and gas reservoirs around the world . The of fracturing, Figure 3 . development of both types of fractures is the result of applied forces and the mechanical properties of the reservoir rock Multiple periods of natural fracturing may have been related materials as measured statically or dynamically, per Figure 1. with varying mechanical properties due to diagenetic alteration of the reservoir occurring between fracturing periods . The Material properties of the rocks such as Young’s Modulus (E), same mechanical property control occurs for hydraulic fracture Poisson’s Ratio (γ), and a combined version called Rigidity or completions in low permeability reservoirs, especially for the Shear Modulus (G), have been used to define the mechanical initiation of hydraulic fractures, fracture propagation, as well as stratigraphy of the reservoir section, Figure 2. hydraulic fracture containment
Quantitative work on many reservoirs around the world has This presentation will focus on how subsurface natural fracture highlighted this relation with different classes of relations for distributions are properly quantified from core observations different rock types . The presentation will show these relations and analysis of interpreted Borehole Image Logs . In addition, and attempt to quantify the relationship and how it might vary these same sections are quantified mechanically using with gross rock type and scale of observation . mechanical properties logs (eg . shear sonic logs) . Lastly, the predictability of natural fracture distributions directly from In general, natural fracture intensity or fracture density mechanical properties logs will be discussed . ■ increases with decreasing Poisson’s Ratio and increasing
Figure 1. Rock mechanic properties are measured in the laboratory (Static) or in the subsurface via shear logs (Dynamic). The two methods result in different values which are appropriately applied in different situations.
18 Houston Geological Society | Applied Geoscience Conference | November 8 – 9, 2017 Figure 2. Shown is an example of use of dynamically obtained mechanical data to define the mechanical stratigraphy of a reservoir section.
Figure 3. Shown is an example of the relationship between core-based Natural Fracture Intensity (FI) and Rigidity Modulus (G) in a Bakken well. Relatively higher G equates to relatively higher FI.
Biographical Sketch “Geologic Analysis of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs” . He has Dr. Ronald A. Nelson has lectured on the subjects of structural geology and fractured worked with fractured reservoirs to Geological Societies, Universities, and National reservoirs for over 40 years Oil Companies in over 20 countries and has been an AAPG with Amoco, BP Amoco and Distinguished Lecturer twice and an SPE Distinguished now Broken N Consulting, Author . He has served as President of the Houston Geological Inc . He has taught numerous Society, Vice President of the AAPG and Councilor at large courses on fractured reservoirs for the Tulsa Geological Society . He was awarded the AAPG for the AAPG, SEG, and NExT, Robert R . Berg Outstanding Research Award in 2013 . and has authored over 100 publications on the subject, including the 1985 and 2001 editions of his textbook entitled
Houston Geological Society | Applied Geoscience Conference | November 8 – 9, 2017 19 A Novel Method for Experimental Determination of Biot’s coefficient in Unconventional Formations. Munir Aldin, Deepak Gokaraju, Abhijit Mitra, Sudarshan Govindarajan, Samuel Aldin, Metarock Laboratories Inc.
Abstract
Biot’s coefficient () is one of the key parameters in determining the anisotropic minimal horizontal stress which is crucial to managing borehole stability, landing zones hydraulic fracturing design and reservoir compaction issues. In this study we propose a new time efficient method to characterize by monitoring the P-wave first arrival time using a high precision device with a resolution of 1 nanosecond. This method only uses acoustic velocity as a gauge while directly quantifying the poro-elastic constant. This method was applied to multiple samples from different shales across North America. Mineralogical data is used to evaluate and analyze the poro-elastic behavior of a few shale samples.
Introduction The efforts related to the unconventional reservoir studies have been increasing to determine the amount of hydrocarbon in place and develop techniques to produce it. Among the items of interest is the understanding of the field in-situ stresses which influence the well stability, landing zones and hydraulic fracturing design and managing reservoir compaction issues. Additionally, adds a significant contribution to field development and economic success.
Methods upon the utilization of sonic logs along with core data to determine anisotropic minimal horizontal stress are well published and found in the literature. Generally, the methods require the understating of mechanical properties and Poroelastic constant (BIOT). Due to the difficulties experienced to access the pore space in ultralow permeability formations (shale) to determine the grain modulus value, supercritical fluids was used while measuring compressional and shear ultrasonic velocity. Measurement confirms relationship between stress and ultrasonic velocity during pore Wednesday, November 8, 2017 | Sessionpressure 1 | 10:15 inflation and hydrostatic pressure deflation. This implies the real-time ultrasonic velocity Munir Aldin, Deepak Gokaraju, Abhijit Mitra, Sudarshan Govindarajan, Samuel Aldin MetaRock Laboratories measurement can be used a gauge to control the required amount of stress. The effective stress law essentially asserts that there are multiple combinations of pore pressure and confining pressure which yield equivalent effective stress states through a simple linear coefficient α. A Novel Method for Experimental Determination of The Biot’s coefficient (α) is a poro-elastic coefficient that defines the relationship between rock matrix Biot’s coefficientframework inand fluids Unconventional in a porous rock. The concept of Formations.effective stress was introduced by Terzaghi (1934, Abstract 1937) by observing the principleshearing by resistance including theof saturatedBiot’s coefficient soils. Biot as shown (1941) below: extended the effective stress Biot’s coefficient (α) is one of the key parametersprinciple byin determiningincluding the Biot’s coefficient as shown below: the anisotropic minimal horizontal stress which is crucial to managing borehole stability, landing zones hydraulic fracturing ′ 𝑃𝑃 design and reservoir compaction issues . In this study we σ' is the effective stress, 𝜎𝜎σ is= the 𝜎𝜎 total stress, −𝛼𝛼𝑃𝑃 α is the Biot’s propose a new time efficient method to characterize is the effecti e α by stress coefficient is the total and stress PP is the ispore the pressure Biot’s . Basedcoefficient on the and concept is the pore pressure Based is the effecti e stress is the total stress is the Biot’s coefficient and is the pore pressure Based monitoring the P-wave first arrival time onusing′ isthe the a concepthigh effecti e precision of stress effecti e of effective is stress the total stress, ultiple stress multiple ethods is themethods Biot’s ha e have coefficient been been presented presented and toto is the easure pore pressure or characteri e Based device with a resolution of 1 nanosecond σon . This′ the methodconcept only of effecti emeasureσ stress or characterize ultiple ethodsα Biot’s coefficient ha e been . The presentedfirst methodPP to easure or characteri e Biot’sσon′ the coefficient. concept of The effecti e firstσ method stress ultipleinvolves calculating ethodsα ha e a Biot’s been coefficient presentedP Pby to uantifying easure or the characteri e grain and uses acoustic velocity as a gauge while directlyBiot’sσ quantifying coefficient. The firstinvolvesσ method calculating involves a Biot’s calculatingα coefficient a Biot’s by quantifyingcoefficient Pthe Pby grain uantifying the grain and bul Biot’s co pressibilit coefficient. They g first and method b respecti ely involves calculating or the grain a Biot’sand bul coefficient odulus by g uantifying and b respecti ely the grain and as the poro-elastic constant . This method bul was applied co pressibilit to y gand and bulk b compressibilityrespecti ely or (Cg the and grain Cb respectively) and bul odulus or the grain g and b respecti ely as multiple samples from different shales acrossshownbul co pressibilitNorth below America ee uddin . y gand and bulk b modulusrespecti ely i pro ed (Kg and orthis Kbthe techni ue respectively) grain and by bul as easuring shown odulus below g . and and b with respecti ely “static” and as shown below ee uddin i pro ed this techni ue by easuring and with “static” and shown below ee uddin i pro ed this techni ue by easuring and with “static” and Mineralogical data is used to evaluate and“dynamics”' analyze the poro-methods. Azeemuddin (2002) improved this technique by measuring𝑏𝑏 Kb 𝑔𝑔 “dynamics”' methods. 𝐾𝐾𝑏𝑏 𝐾𝐾𝑔𝑔 elastic behavior of a few shale samples . “dynamics”' methods. and Kg with “static” and “dynamics”' methods . 𝐾𝐾 𝐾𝐾 𝐾𝐾𝑏𝑏 𝐾𝐾𝑔𝑔
Introduction 𝐶𝐶𝑔𝑔 𝐾𝐾𝑏𝑏 𝛼𝛼 =1− 𝐶𝐶𝑔𝑔 = 1 − 𝐾𝐾𝑏𝑏 The efforts related to the unconventional reservoir studies have 𝐶𝐶𝑔𝑔𝑏𝑏 𝐾𝐾𝑔𝑔𝑏𝑏 𝛼𝛼 =1− 𝐶𝐶𝑏𝑏 = 1 − 𝐾𝐾𝑔𝑔 ran uet and bass proposed measuring𝛼𝛼 Biot’s coefficient =1− 𝐶𝐶𝑏𝑏 = 1 − by 𝐾𝐾 𝑔𝑔measuring the e pelled fluid olu e is been increasing to determine the amount ran uet of hydrocarbon and bass in proposedFranquet measuring and Abass Biot’sproposed coefficient𝐶𝐶 measuring by𝐾𝐾 Biot’s measuring coefficient the e pelled by fluid olu e is place and develop techniques to produce the ran uetit . Among ratio ofandthe ariation items bass proposed inmeasuring pore olu e measuring the expelled Biot’s and fluid coefficienttotal volume roc . α olu ebyis the measuring ratio of variation with the e pelledchange in fluid stress olu e as shown is the ratio of ariation in pore olu e and total roc olu e with change in stress as shown of interest is the understanding of the fieldbelow:the in-situ ratio stressesof ariation inin pore pore olu e volume (Δ Vp) and and total total rock roc volume olu e (ΔV ) with withchange change in stress as shown below: Δ𝑉𝑉𝑃𝑃 Δ𝑉𝑉 which influence the well stability, landingbelow: zones and hydraulic in stress as shownΔ𝑉𝑉 below:𝑃𝑃 Δ𝑉𝑉 Δ𝑉𝑉𝑃𝑃 Δ𝑉𝑉 fracturing design and managing reservoir compaction issues . Additionally, adds a significant contribution to field 𝑃𝑃 Δ𝑉𝑉𝑃𝑃 development and economic success . 𝛼𝛼 = Δ𝑉𝑉𝑃𝑃 𝛼𝛼 = Δ𝑉𝑉Δ𝑉𝑉 He and Ling (2014) and Qiao𝛼𝛼 (2012) = Δ𝑉𝑉 proposed a method to estimate Biot’s coefficient usingΔ𝑉𝑉 changes in permeability Methods upon the utilization of sonic logs along with core with variation of stresses . Both methods assume that the data to determine anisotropic minimal horizontal e and ing stress are and iao proposed a method to estimate Biot’s coefficient using changes in well published and found in the literature e . Generally, and ing the andpermeability iao and proposed strain follow a method the effective-stress to estimate lawBiot’s . coefficient using changes in per eability e and ing with ariation and iao of stresses proposed Both ethods a method assu e to estimate that the Biot’s per eability coefficient andusing strain changes follow in methods require the understating of mechanicalper eability properties with and ariation According of stresses to the methods, Both ethods Biot’s coefficient assu e thatis the the ratio per eability of the and strain follow theper eability effecti e stresswith ariation law. According of stresses to the Both methods, ethods Biot’s assu e coefficient that theis the per eability ratio of the and variation strain followof the Poroelastic constant (BIOT) . Due to the difficultiesthe effecti e experienced stress law. variation According of the to confiningthe methods, pressure Biot’s to thecoefficient variation isof thethe ratiopore of the variation of the to access the pore space in ultralow permeabilityconfiningthe effecti e formations pressure stress to law. thepressure According ariation while ofto maintaining thethe poremethods, pressure constant Biot’s while strain coefficient aintaining(He and is Ling) the constant ratioor of strainthe variation e and of ing the confining pressure to the ariation of the pore pressure while aintaining constant strain e and ing (shale) to determine the grain modulus value,orconfining studying supercritical pressure the change to the instudying per eability ariation the ofchange the iao porein permeability which pressure is while(Qiao), aintaining which is constant strain e and ing or studying the change in per eability iao which is fluids was used while measuring compressionalor studying and shearthe change in per eability iao which is ultrasonic velocity . Measurement confirms relationship 𝑝𝑝 between stress and ultrasonic velocity during pore pressure Δ𝜎𝜎 Δ𝑘𝑘 Δ𝜎𝜎 Δ𝑘𝑘𝑝𝑝 where Δkp is the changewhere of permeability Δkp is the change with𝛼𝛼 theof permeability = Δ𝑃𝑃 ariationΔ𝜎𝜎𝑃𝑃 = Δ𝑘𝑘𝑝𝑝𝑐𝑐 of with the the pore variation pressure of while confining stress is inflation and hydrostatic pressure deflation . This implies the Δ𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 Δ𝑘𝑘𝑐𝑐 where Δkp is the change of permeability with𝛼𝛼 the = ariation𝑃𝑃 = 𝑐𝑐 of the pore pressure while confining stress is real-time ultrasonic velocity measurementkeptwhere can constant, be Δkp used is athe gaugeand change Δkc isthe ofthe pore permeability change pressure of per eabilitywhile with 𝛼𝛼confining the = Δ𝑃𝑃 ariation with= stressΔ𝑘𝑘 the of is ariation thekept pore constant, ofpressure the and confining while confining stress while stress pore is kept constant, and Δkc is the change of per eability with the ariation of the confining stress while pore to control the required amount of stress . pressurekeptThe effectiveconstant, is aintained stress and Δkc isΔkc constant the is changethe change nof per eabilitylowof permeability per eability with with theformations the ariation variation likeof thethe shale’s confining or tight stress sandstones, while pore pressure is aintainedconfining constant stress n lowwhile per eabilitypore pressure isformations maintained likeconstant shale’s . or tight sandstones, law essentially asserts that there are multiple easupressure combinationsring is ariations aintained of in per eabilityconstant n or lowin pore per eability olu e using formations the abo e like ethods shale’s are or tightdifficult sandstones, and ti e pore pressure and confining pressure which easu yieldring equivalent ariations in Inper eability low permeability or in formations pore olu e like shale’susing theor tight abo e sandstones, ethods are difficult and ti e consu ing easuring ariations sage of insupercritical per eability gas or instead in pore of olu e fluid in using tight the for ations abo e ethods will increase are difficult ti e efficiencyand ti e effective stress states through a simple linearconsu ing coefficient sage α . of supercriticalmeasuring variations gas instead in permeability of fluid in ortight in pore for ations volume using will increase ti e efficiency whileconsu ing a oiding sage slippage of supercritical lin enberg gas effect instead owe er of fluid inper eability tight for ations e peri ents will increase with supercritical ti e efficiency gas while a oiding slippage the lin enberg above methods effect are difficult owe er and per eability time consuming e peri ents . Usage with supercritical gas The Biot’s coefficient (α) is a poro-elasticarewhile coefficient prone a oiding to gas that slippage lea age defines of lin enberg supercritical gas effect instead owe er of fluid inper eability tight formations e peri ents will with supercritical gas are prone to gas lea age the relationship between rock matrix frameworkare prone and to fluids gas lea age in increase time efficiency while avoiding slippage (Klinkenberg) a porous rock . The concept of effective stress was introduced effect . However, permeability experiments with supercritical by Terzaghi (1934, 1937) by observing theMethod shearing resistance gas are prone to gas leakage . of saturated soils . Biot (1941) extended theMethod effective stress The proposed ethod in ol es using wa e arri al ti e as a gauge to measure Biot’s coefficient alue 20 The proposedHouston ethod Geological in ol es Society using | Applied wa e Geoscience arri al Conferenceti e as a gauge| November to measure 8 – 9, 2017 Biot’s coefficient alue insteadThe proposed of per eability ethod in ol es as suggested using by wa e iao arri al ti e t is co onas a gauge to touse measure ultrasonic Biot’s elocity coefficient to calculate alue instead of per eability as suggested by iao t is co on to use ultrasonic elocity to calculate elasticinstead properties of per eability such as suggested oung s odulus by iao and hear t is odulus co on of to lasticity use ultrasonic and oisson s elocity to ratio calculate The elastic properties such as oung s odulus and hear odulus of lasticity and oisson s ratio The assu ptionelastic properties in ol ed such in thisas oung s ethod odulusis that the and change hear in odulus wa e elocity of lasticity follows and the oisson s effecti e stressratio Thelaw assu ption in ol ed in this ethod is that the change in wa e elocity follows the effecti e stress law assertassu ptioning that in ol ed there inare this ultiple ethod co binations is that the change of pore in pressurewa e elocity and confining follows the pressure effecti e which stress yield law asserting that there are ultiple co binations of pore pressure and confining pressure which yield e ui alentasserting that effecti e there stressare ultiple states through co binations a si ple of linerpore coefficient pressure and hile confining introducing pressure a s all which pressure yield e ui alent effecti e stress states through a si ple liner coefficient hile introducing a s all pressure stepe ui alent change effecti e psi stress the stateschange through in wa e a si ple elocity liner is coefficient s all hile ft sec introducing re uiring a s allhigh precisionpressure step change psi the change in wa e elocity is s all ft sec re uiring a high precision step change psi the change in wa e elocity is s all ft sec re uiring a high precision Method The proposed method involves using P-wave arrival time as a gauge to measure Biot’s coefficient value instead of permeability as suggested by Qiao (2012) . It is common to use ultrasonic velocity to calculate elastic properties such as Young's Modulus and Shear Modulus of Elasticity, and Poisson's ratio . The assumption involved in this method is that the change in P-wave velocity follows the effective stress law asserting that there are multiple combinations of pore pressure and confining pressure which yield equivalent effective stress states through a simple liner coefficient . Figure 2. Biot's Experiment
While introducing a small pressure pressure (red curve) . The ratio of the confining pressure change i re Biot s Experiment step change (~300psi) the change in P-wave velocity is small during the first half of the experiment and the pore pressure (200 ft/sec) requiring a high precision device for first arrival change during second half of the experiment is the Biot’s time (ITT ) detection with a resolution of 1 nanosecond to p eferences coefficient . device for first arrival timemonitor real time detection change within ultrasonic a resolution velocity of . This nano methodsecond to monitor real time only uses acoustic velocity as a gauge while . directly ranquet quantifying . . . and . . The ass. paper . quantifies xperimental and e aluation compares of Biot s Biot’s poroelastic coefficient parameter for three change in ultrasonic velocity. This method only uses acousticdifferent velocity methods. as n thea gauge th . . mposiumwhile direct on oc ly Mechanics M une ail olorado. the poro-elastic𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝑝𝑝 constant . Since it is done real time, the multiple samples . Mineralogical data is available for a select few . Ter aghi . . The shearing resistance of saturated soil. n roceeding of the irst nternational uantifying the poro elasticconfining constant. stress inceis then it increased is done untilreal thetime, ΔITT the returns confining to 0 . stress is then increased onferencep in oil Mechanics samples pp which. . are analyzed and compared along with Biot’s until the returns to . Biot’s coefficient can then be uantified using n Biot’s coefficient can then be quantified . using: Ter aghi . . Theoreticalcoefficient soil mechanics. and .other ile poro-elastic ons nc. mechanical properties . . Biot M. . . eneral theor of three dimensional consolidation. . appl. h sics ancaster a. Δ𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝑝𝑝 p. . References device for first arrival time detection with aΔ𝜎𝜎 resolution . of eertsma nanosecond . . toThe monitor effect1 . F ofranquet, real fluid time pressure J .A .S decline . and H on .H olumetric . Abass . 1999changes . Experimental of porous roc s. The proposed method can𝛼𝛼 increase = accuracy mericanin the experiment nstitute of Mining Metallurgical and etroleum ngineers change in ultrasonic velocity. This𝑝𝑝 method only uses𝑃𝑃 acoustic velocity as a gauge whileevaluation directly of Biot's poroelastic parameter three different 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 Δ𝑃𝑃 6. e . and . ing. . e Method to etermine Biot oefficients of Ba en amples. In the 48th US uantifying the porobecause elastic of constant.the significant ince it differenceis done real in time, the resolutionthe confining stress is thenmethods increased . In the 37th U .S . Symposium on Rock Mechanics Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium in Minneapolis, MN, USA, 1-4 June 2014. The proposeduntil themethod returnscanbetween increase to . permeability Biot’s accuracy coefficient measurements in can the then e periment be and uantified acoustic because using velocity of the significant(USRMS), difference 7-9 June, in Vail, Colorado . . iao . . . . . ong . guilera and . ant as. . etermination of Biot s effecti e stress measurements . The proposed method is also significantly the resolution between𝑝𝑝 permeability measurements and acousticcoefficient velocity for measurements.permea ilit of i anassin The sandstone.proposed ournal of anadian etroleum Technolog . . Δ𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 method is also significantlyquicker uic er. . . ousleiman . ui . .2 .T erzaghi, oroelastic K ,. solutions1936 . The in trans ersel shearing resistance isotropic mediaof saturated for ell ore soil . and Δ𝜎𝜎 c linder. nternational ournalIn of Proceeding olids and tructures of the First olume International ssues – Conference ecem er in Soil ages 𝛼𝛼 = 𝑃𝑃 Figure 2 shows preliminary test Δ𝑃𝑃results of an experiment– Mechanics, V1: pp . 54--56 . The proposed methodconducted can increase using theaccuracy proposed in the method e periment . Figure because 2 shows of the significant difference in the resolution betweenthe increase permeability in arrival measurements time (Green and curve) acoustic with velocity increasing measurements. 3 The .T erzaghi, proposed K ,. 1943 . Theoretical soil mechanics . J . Wiley & method is also significantlyconfining uic er. pressure during the first halfB of the experiment . The Sons, Inc . second half shows decrease in arrival time with increasing Pore
4 .B iot, M . A ,. 1941 . General theory of three-dimensional