DOCSLIB.ORG

Extensions of Remarks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Extensions of Remarks 1866 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS February 5, 1979 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS INTRODUCTION OF LEGISLATION session, thereby precluding the poosibility period of time for congressional review TO IMPROVE CONGRESSIONAL of any congressional oversight or action. would be onerous bncden for the prospec­ OVERSIGHT OF ARMS SALES Only an unwritteill, unspoken assumption tive arms buyer or for the Departments that such action would violate the spirit of State or Defense. Clearly, the addition of the act prevents such a decision by the of a few days or weeks to the process of HON-. ROBERT F. ORIN AN executive to escape congressional over­ foreign military sales will not have any OF MASSACHUSETTS sight. It is time to write this assumption deleterious effect. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES into law so that we do not oonfront the Nor does anyone need to fear that the Monday, February 5, 1979 ever-present possibility that at some time additional review period might prevent in the future an admind.stration will be the United States from providing mili­ • Mr. DRINAN. Mr. Speaker, on Janu­ able to complete a major weapons sale tary supplies to an ally during an emer­ ary 15 I introduced legislation to amend which is opposed by the majority of the gency. The most recent example of such the Arms Export COilitrol Act to extend Congress and the American people by the a situation was the Middle East war of the time period for oon.gressional review simple expedient of proposing it during a 1973. At that time, Israel, under attack of major weapons sales proposals from congressional recess. on two fronts by enemies who were being 30 calendar days to 45 days in which The bill simply amends section 36 (b) supplied with massive quantities of arms Congress is in continuous session. of the Arms Export Control Act to give by the Soviet Union, needed replacement As originally adopted in 1975, the land­ the Congress 45 days during which it is equipment. This was provided in the mark Arms Export Act provided Congress in continuous session, rather than the form of grants, not sales. Thus, any with 20 calendar days in which to dis­ present 30 calendar days, within which repetition of the emergency which oc­ approve major arms sales by adoption of to consider and, if warranted, take action curred in the Middle East would result in joint resolutions of disapproval by the to disapprove by joint resolution all U.S. arms transfers totally outside the House and Senate. This time period weapons sales in excess of $25 million. scope of the Arms Export Control Act proved inadequate, and in 1976 Congress The only change is in the time period. and the oversight mechanisms contained increased the time period from 20 to 30 Forty-five days of continuous session therein. calendar days. Recent experience, how­ simply means that no days during are­ Mr. Speaker, there is simply no reason ever, indicates clearly that this marginal cess of either House of Congress of more for us to delay in taking the necessary increase is also insufficient to afford Con­ than 3 days could count against the action to improve congressional oversight gress the time necessary for careful con­ overall review period, in effect extending of major arms sales. At present, that sideration of weapons transfers which it for a corresponding amount of time. oversight responsibility is seriously com­ have major foreign policy implications. The legislative precedent for the con­ promised by a time period which is too Moreover, the time period remained one tinuous session formula is found in sec­ brief and method of computing that time of calendar rather than legislative days, tion 601 of the Arms Export Control Act period which is subject to abuse by the thereby making no distinction between of 1976. This proposed change in the Executive. In order to permit Congress to legislative sessions and recesses. language of the law would prevent a review major arms sales effectively, we Events in the closing days of the 94th situation in which an administration must amend the Arms Export Control Congress demonstrated the shortcomings could report one or several proposed Act so as to extend and revise the period of the 30-calendar day period. On Sep­ weapons sales during the August recess, of time within which Congress can act. It tember 1, 1976, just prior to the Labor for example, and thus effectively prevent is my hope that the House will act Day recess, the President submitted to congressional review and a possible veto. promptly on this measure, so that Con­ the Congress, pursuant to the terms of Increasingly, some of our Nation's most gress can assume its proper role in the the Arms Export Control Act, proposals important foreign policy decisions take oversight of all future arms sales. to sell arms to 11 separate nations at a the form of arms transfers. We have wit­ The text of the legislation follows: total cost of over $6 billion contained in nessed an alarming increase in the vol­ H .R . - 37 separate transaJctions. Starting from ume of foreign military sales and a dis­ A bill to amend the Arms Export Control Act the moment Congress received the Exec­ turbing growth of sales to developing na­ to change the method of determining the utive announcement, the clock began tions and those in very volatile parts of period of time for adopting a concurrent ticking toward the 30-day deadline. Fail­ the world. In addition, the weapons resolution of Con gress objecting to a pro­ ure to act positively would mean that the which we sell are more sophisticated and posed sale under such Act sale would go forward exactly as pro­ destructive than ever before. In contrast Be it enacted by the Senate and House posed by the President. When Congress to the days when we sold surplus stocks of Representativ es of the United States of returned from the Labor Day recess, America in Congress assembled, That the last almost exclusively and confined these sentence of section 36(b) (1) of the Arms during the extremely busy closing days sales largely to traditional allies, today Export Control Act is amended by striking of the legislative session, the House and we sell our most advanced and deadly out "thirty calendar days after receiving such Senate had but 24 days within which to military weapons systems to nations certification" and inserting in lieu thereof consider these 37 major arms sales. throughout the world, many of which "the first period of forty-five days of con­ The proposal to sell AWACS to Iran is have traditionally been hostile to the po­ tinuous session of Congress after the date another example of the need for an ex­ licies and interests of the United States. on which Congress receives such certifica­ tension of the congressional review pe­ If Congress is to exercise responsibly its tion."• riod. The debate in Congress on the sale oversight of American foreign policy, it of seven E-3A airborne warning and con­ must be able to analyze carefully and, TRIBUTE TO ANDY BIEMILLER trol system <AWACS) to Iran for $1.2 if necessary, disapprove foreign military billion raised a number of very serious sales. This is difficult if not impossible questions. Not the least of them was the under the existing 30-calendar-day re­ HON. FRANK THOMPSON, JR. ability of the Congress to be certain that view period. OF NEW JERSEY it had enough time to debate fully and It is essential to note that major weap­ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES analyze thoroughly all major arms sales. ons sales are not the subject of spur of In light of current unrest in that coun­ the moment decisions; they are dis­ Thursday, February 1, 1979 try, further consideration was clearly cussed, planned and negotiated months e Mr. THOMPSON. Mr. Speaker, I speak called for. or years in advance of the actual com­ today to honor a man who has been con­ At present, there is nothing in the mencement of the transfer. Moreover, tributing to the legislative process for as Anns Export Control Act which would arms sales contracts can extend over long as any current Member of Congress. prevent any administration from sub­ several years. There is, therefore, no rea­ For 50 years Andy Biemiller has served mitting a sale when Congress is not in son to believe that a slightly extended this country in a variety of public roles • This "bullet" symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by the Member on the floor. February 5, 1979 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 1867 including teacher, journalist, State and What speaks most highly of Andy needed for national security, and in re­ Federal law writer and lawmaker. For the Biemiller is that he was welcome all over sponse to these people the President has longest, most recent period of time Andy the Hill in offices of Congresspersons of announced to the NATO allies that America's has been the chief advocate and lobbyist every political persuasion. He managed real defense spending will rise by 3% in 1980 provided only that infiation is held in check. for the AFL-CIO and the entire labor to become almost an institution. When­ The budget cutter thus finds that this ave­ movement. ever an important social issue causes a nue to a smaller deficit is controversial as I am not eloquent enough to express need for good solid analysis, understand­ well. sufficiently the great esteem and high ing, and advocacy, his absence will be Other large budget categories, such as in­ regard I, as well as the other Members of felt.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • YDC Talks to Photojournalist Scout Tufankjian Brinda Gupta of the Crowd in All of the Photos She Snapped
    In this issue News 1–4 Lifestyle 5–7 YDC ask teens Entertainment 8–10 to suggest budget cuts Sports 12 NCAA info Viewpoints 14–15 page 16 On the Street 16 page 12 Volume 18 • Number 5 • Winter 2008 • Please display through March 7 YDC talks to photojournalist Scout Tufankjian Brinda Gupta of the crowd in all of the photos she snapped. Young D.C. YDC sat down with Tufankjian Jan. 24. She President Barack Obama has become a sym- was signing her book Yes We Can at Studio B. The bol for hope and change for people across the coun- book takes readers on a journey from Obama as a try and around the world. He gripped the attention long-shot candidate all the way to election night. of many as he traveled from town to town on the She explained the exhilaration, and, yes, even the presidential campaign trail, winning people over fatigue that came walking alongside Obama at at each stop. Some were won over by his genial campaign stops, following his campaign bus on the personality, others by his political beliefs, and still road, or even flying in his campaign’s jet. others with the belief that the country just needed a “I was sent to cover him in a book signing in new direction. Unlike many of those who followed New Hampshire, and I didn’t want to go…but they candidate Obama’s every step through the media, found someone to pay me, and I took the five to photojournalist Scout Tufankjian experienced the six hour drive to New Hampshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Shelf June2019 Debate.Indd
    Preface The Arms Debate: American Security or International Turmoil The United States is the world’s most prolifi c producer and distributor of arms and military equipment. Having exploded into the arms trade business after World War II, the United States has since dominated an industry worth an estimated $100 billion each year and still growing. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute ( SIPRI), weapons sales between 2013 and 2017 were 10 percent higher than from 2008 to 2012. Much of this escalation can be attributed to the on- going effort to combat radical militant organizations and the alleged need to provide weapons to war-torn regions to prevent instability. The United States accounts for 34 percent of all arms sales, an increase from 30 percent in 2012. Comparatively, the United States output of arms is 58 percent higher than that of the next most prolifi c arms dealer, Russia. America’s role in arms trading is controversial. When the United States started dealing weapons during World War I, allied lobbyists and politicians created the perception that the arms trade benefi tted the American middle and working classes. As America progressed as an arms dealer during World War II, it was argued that arms trading was a necessary feature of American foreign policy, enabling the Unit- ed States to exert indirect infl uence over allies and even potential enemy states and providing leverage for essential economic and foreign policy initiatives. Neverthe- less, America has had an active, growing anti-arms trading lobby since World War II which argues that America’s involvement in the industry is immoral and creates more problems than it solves.
    [Show full text]
  • LETTER LABOR ADVISORY BOARD APRIL 2015 Vol
    Published By AMERICAN INCOME LIFE & NATIONAL INCOME LIFE LETTER LABOR ADVISORY BOARD APRIL 2015 Vol. 47 No. 2 of living,” AFL-CIO President Richard President Leo W. Gerard in a statement. NEWS FROM THE Trumka told the news media when he an- “There was no way we would have won vast AFL-CIO, CTW, nounced formation of the commission. He improvements in safety and staffing without INTERNATIONAL & said the federation will fight racism as a it.” According to the union, the agreement key to raising wages. “Politicians are using calls for joint review on the local level of NATIONAL UNIONS coded racial language to divide us,” Trumka future staffing levels and hiring plans. The said, singling out recent remarks by now- tentative agreement calls for yearly wage The AFL-CIO announced a Fox news commentator Rudy Giuliani, the increases as well as maintaining the current “comprehensive national raising wages former mayor of New York. He said anti- health care plan cost-sharing ratio. Strikes initiative” at its winter Executive Council union groups try to divide white and Af- could continue at specific refineries if local meeting in Atlanta in late February. The rican-American workers. “We have to rec- unions cannot come to an agreement with purpose of the initiative is to fight “by rais- ognize it for what it is and fight it,” he said. employers. More than 5,000 workers at ing all workers’ wages” and “workers’ right to 15 refineries and chemical plants went on organize and bargain with our employers… The United Steelworkers strike starting February 1 with a handful without fear of reprisal or dismissal,” the (USW) March 12 reached a tentative of refineries and spread across the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating the Centenary of the Communist Party of Iran
    Celebrating the Centenary of the Communist Party of Iran Document of the Enlarged Plenary Meeting of Central Committee (Feb. 2020) Dear Comrades, June 2020 marks the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of Iran. Although the seeds of the labour and social democracy movement in our homeland were planted and grown during the Constitutional Revolution (1906) - and had a decisive impact on its development and victory - the Iranian labour and communist movement in the form of an organised and cohesive party formally began in June 1920 with the founding of the Communist Party of Iran led by the prominent figure of the Constitutional Revolution, Haydar Amo-Oghli (also known as Haydar Khan). The history of the left and Marxist ideas in Iran dates back to the late 19th century and early 20th century. With the rapid growth of industry and the development of the capitalist mode of production, Marx’s teachings found their way to Iran. The social and political arena of that period could be summarised, within the historic development of Iranian society, as the transition from feudalism to capitalism. The nascent capitalism of that time was growing, albeit sluggishly, while in parallel the birth and formation of the working class was taking shape. In the late 19th century, under the influence and impact of progressive left-wing views, the anti- dictatorship struggle grew significantly, and a growing number of people began to join the revolutionary struggle. Abdolhossein Agāhi, our martyred comrade and a prominent historian, wrote in his book, “The History of [political]Parties in Iran”, about the growth of socialism in Iran: “For the first time in Iran, in [an edition Figure 1: Haydar Amo- Ogghli, Leader of the of] the newspaper “Iran” (March 1917) an article from Communist Party of Iran, 1920 “Akhtar” newspaper (printed in Istanbul) - [originally published] on the occasion of the 9th anniversary of the Paris Commune (March 18, 1871) - [was reprinted] in which socialist ideas were introduced [to Iran].
    [Show full text]
  • The Iranian Revolution, Past, Present and Future
    The Iranian Revolution Past, Present and Future Dr. Zayar Copyright © Iran Chamber Society The Iranian Revolution Past, Present and Future Content: Chapter 1 - The Historical Background Chapter 2 - Notes on the History of Iran Chapter 3 - The Communist Party of Iran Chapter 4 - The February Revolution of 1979 Chapter 5 - The Basis of Islamic Fundamentalism Chapter 6 - The Economics of Counter-revolution Chapter 7 - Iranian Perspectives Copyright © Iran Chamber Society 2 The Iranian Revolution Past, Present and Future Chapter 1 The Historical Background Iran is one of the world’s oldest countries. Its history dates back almost 5000 years. It is situated at a strategic juncture in the Middle East region of South West Asia. Evidence of man’s presence as far back as the Lower Palaeolithic period on the Iranian plateau has been found in the Kerman Shah Valley. And time and again in the course of this long history, Iran has found itself invaded and occupied by foreign powers. Some reference to Iranian history is therefore indispensable for a proper understanding of its subsequent development. The first major civilisation in what is now Iran was that of the Elamites, who might have settled in South Western Iran as early as 3000 B.C. In 1500 B.C. Aryan tribes began migrating to Iran from the Volga River north of the Caspian Sea and from Central Asia. Eventually two major tribes of Aryans, the Persian and Medes, settled in Iran. One group settled in the North West and founded the kingdom of Media. The other group lived in South Iran in an area that the Greeks later called Persis—from which the name Persia is derived.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Is Moving Further from Fostering Multilateral Restraint of Conventional Arms Sales
    Penn State International Law Review Volume 6 Article 3 Number 3 Dickinson Journal of International Law 1988 The nitU ed States Is Moving Further From Fostering Multilateral Restraint of Conventional Arms Sales William George Wentz Follow this and additional works at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Wentz, William George (1988) "The nitU ed States Is Moving Further From Fostering Multilateral Restraint of Conventional Arms Sales," Penn State International Law Review: Vol. 6: No. 3, Article 3. Available at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr/vol6/iss3/3 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Penn State Law eLibrary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Penn State International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Penn State Law eLibrary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The United States Is Moving Further From Fostering Multilateral Restraint Of Conventional Arms Sales Arms sales is the blind spot of our generation. Every gener- ation has its own blind spot which is incomprehensible to future generations - slave trade of the eighteenth century and childworkers of the nineteenth century. Like the other evils, this too shall pass.1 I. Introduction Not by itself, it will not pass. History has shown that leadership, by a particular nation and with concerted diplomatic effort, has been a principal ingredient leading to positive results from multilateral conventional arms2 transfer restraint efforts.3 In the last thirty years, arms transfer has become a national security and diplomatic instru- ment of the major powers," as the quantity of arms transferred5 and level of their technological sophistication has increased.
    [Show full text]
  • R01545 0.Pdf
    Date Printed: 11/03/2008 JTS Box Number: IFES 2 Tab Number: 10 Document Title: The 1990 Bulgarian Elections: A Pre-Election Assessment, May 1990 Document Date: 1990 Document Country: Bulgaria IFES ID: R01545 ~" I •••··:"_:5 .~ International Foundation fo, Electo,al Systems I --------------------------~---------------- ~ 1101 15th STREET. NW·THIRD FLOOR· WASHINGTON. D.C. 20005·12021 828-8507·FAX 12021 452-0804 I I I I I THE 1990 BULGARIAN ELECTIONS: A PRE-ELECTION ASSESSMENT I I MAY 1990 I I Team Members Dr. John Bell Mr. Ronald A. Gould I Dr. Richard G. Smolka I I I I This report was made possible by a grant from the National Endowment for Democracy. Any person or organization is welcome to quote information from this report if it is attributed to IFES. I 8CWlD OF DIREQORS Barbara Boggs Maureen A. Kindel WilHam R. Sweeney. Jr. Randal C. Teague Counsel Charles T. Manatt Patricia Hutar Frank 1. Fahrenkopf Jr. Jean-Pierre Kingsley leon). Weir I Chairman SecretaI)' Judy Fernald Peter M(Pher~On DIREQORS EMERITI Richard W. Soudricne David R. Jones Joseph Napolitan James M. Cannon Director I Vice Chairman Treasurer Victor Kamber Sonia Picado S. Richard M Scammon I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ii I TABLE OF CONTENTS I Part I. overview I Mission 3 Executive Summary 4 I The Historical context 6 I Current Political Scene 13 I Part II. Election Law and procedures Constitutional and Legal Foundations of Electoral Law 20 I The Law on Political Parties The Election Act I Analysis of the Law I The Electoral system 30 structure and Procedures I Comments and Analysis I Electoral Needs 38 I Team Recommendations 41 I I Appendices A.
    [Show full text]
  • Limiting Terms, Not Limiting the Executive Branch
    Limiting Terms, Not Limiting the Executive Branch Rachel Star When the Framers drafted the 1787 Constitution, argument and controversy surrounded almost every issue except the election of George Washington as the first President of the United States. Washington was a great leader, so great that he was asked by Hamilton to become king and serve for life. However, after he served as president for eight years—two terms—Washington decided not to run again. In his Farewell Address published in 1796, he stated, “The disorders and miseries which result [in any country] gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.”1 In that address, Washington implicitly set the precedent for an unofficial two- term limit on all presidents to come. That precedent, often referred to as an unwritten rule, would not be broken for nearly 145 years, until the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt. In 1941, Franklin Roosevelt became the first American president to be elected for a third term and thus the first to break with the two-term tradition begun by Washington. While he was extremely popular and was even re-elected in 1944 for a fourth term, his blatant disregard of the boundaries established by all his predecessors was a significant change. Like any change, it incited a backlash. The backlash came in the form of the 22nd Amendment, which converted the two-term limit from mere tradition into a formal part of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Forces of History: American-Iranian Diplomacy 1949-1953
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2000 Forces of history: American-Iranian diplomacy 1949-1953 James H. Hippensteel The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Hippensteel, James H., "Forces of history: American-Iranian diplomacy 1949-1953" (2000). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5205. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5205 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY Hie University ofMONTANA Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. * * Please check " Yes" or "No" and provide signature * * Yes, I grant permission No, I do not grant permission Author's Signature Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's explicit consent. THE FORCES OF HISTORY: AMERICAN-IRAMAN DIPLOMACY, 1949-1953 by James H. Hippensteel B.A. The University o f Montana, 1996 presented in partial fulfillment o f the requirements for die degree o f Master of Arts The University o f Montana 2000 Approved by: DearvGraduateSc to o l 5-31- 2M«> Date UMI Number: EP40669 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The guality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS Studia Iranica Upsaliensia 28
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS Studia Iranica Upsaliensia 28 Traces of Time The Image of the Islamic Revolution, the Hero and Martyrdom in Persian Novels Written in Iran and in Exile Behrooz Sheyda ABSTRACT Sheyda, B. 2016. Traces of Time. The Image of the Islamic Revolution, the Hero and Martyrdom in Persian Novels Written in Iran and in Exile. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Iranica Upsaliensia 28. 196 pp. Uppsala. ISBN 978-91-554-9577-0 The present study explores the image of the Islamic Revolution, the concept of the hero, and the concept of martyrdom as depicted in ten post-Revolutionary Persian novels written and published in Iran compared with ten post-Revolutionary Persian novels written and published in exile. The method is based on a comparative analysis of these two categories of novels. Roland Barthes’s structuralism will be used as the theoretical tool for the analysis of the novels. The comparative analysis of the two groups of novels will be carried out within the framework of Foucault’s theory of discourse. Since its emergence, the Persian novel has been a scene for the dialogue between the five main discourses in the history of Iran since the Constitutional Revolution; this dialogue, in turn, has taken place within the larger framework of the dialogue between modernity and traditionalism. The main conclusion to be drawn from the present study is that the establishment of the Islamic Republic has merely altered the makeup of the scene, while the primary dialogue between modernity and traditionalism continues unabated. This dialogue can be heard in the way the Islamic Republic, the hero, and martyrdom are portrayed in the twenty post-Revolutionary novels in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Performing and Remembering Subnational Internationalism in the Age of Developed Socialism
    Asymmetries of Internationalism: Performing and Remembering Subnational Internationalism in the Age of Developed Socialism TIMOTHY NUNAN In 1976, Dushanbe’s community of some 150 Iranian socialists traveled 28 kilometers into the mountains to attend the opening of a resort for the exclusive use of the Iranian community in the Tajik SSR. The resort reflected the initiative of several members of the Tudeh Party of Iran exiled to Dushanbe.1 As one exile noted, “on Saturdays and Sundays, more than fifty to sixty Iranian emigrants gathered there with their families. This resort took on the name “Iran Zone” (Iran Zon/Mantaqah-ye Iran).”2 The opening of “Iran Zone” was but one chapter in a long history of exchange between the Persian-speaking lands of the Tajik SSR, Iran, and Afghanistan during the twentieth century. The Soviet Union had sponsored the creation of Tajikistan as a Union Republic in 1929 partly to offer Iranians and Afghans a socialist model. And against the background of the Tajik SSR’s transformation into a “laboratory of socialist development” in the 1960s, Dushanbe also become a place of refuge and education for Iranian and Afghan socialists.3 The opening of a complex like I would like to thank the Volkswagen Foundation and the German Research Foundation for their support. I am also grateful to both Siarhei Bohdan and Natasha Klimenko at the Free University of Berlin for their feedback on various iterations of this article, and to Kurt Schultz of The Russian Review for guiding this article into print. The author acknowledges support by the Freie Universität Berlin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Move to Global War Japan 1931-1941
    Timeline of Key Events - Paper 1 - The Move to Global War Japan 1931-1941 Revision Activities - Remembering the chronological order and specific dates is an ​ important skill in IBDP History and can help you to organise the flow of events and how they are connected. Studied the timeline of key events below, taken from the IBDP specification, and test yourself often. ​ Japanese Foreign Policy Events - Events related to International Cooperation and ​ ​ Collective Security - International Responses to Japanese Aggression ​ ​ 1853 July - Commodore Perry sails into Nagasaki harbour to open trade negotiations ​ ​ ​ ​ with the Japanese emperor 1854 31 March - Treaty of Kanagawa with the USA signed by Shogun Tokugawa ​ ​ ​ Yoshinobu 1868 3 January - Meiji Restoration - Restoration of Meiji rule is declared. The Boshin ​ ​ ​ ​ War breaks out between forces of the ex-Tokugawa Shogun and Imperial Court. ​ 1873 Mass conscription is introduced ​ 1874 1 February - Meirokusha (Meiji 6 Society) is formed to promote what is called ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ‘civilisation and enlightenment’ through its social-criticism journal ‘Meiroku Zasshi’ 1877 29 January - The Satsuma Rebellion of disaffected Samurai begins. By ​ ​ ​ September, its leader, Saigo Takamori, committed suicide ending the last and most serious uprising against the new Meiji government 1881 Gen'yōsha (Dark/Black Ocean Society) founded in Japan as an ultranationalist ​ secret political and social group. It used criminal means to achieve its ends, believing in Pan-Asianism and called for increasing Japanese influence over mainland Asia. 1882 4 January - The Imperial Rescript to Soldiers and Sailors is published. ​ ​ ​ Established the principle of absolute loyalty to the Emperor, and banned soldiers from expressing political opinions or comments on imperial policy 1889 11 February - The Emperor promulgates the Constitution of the Empire of Japan ​ ​ providing Japan with a constitutional monarchy on the Prussian model.
    [Show full text]